Open Access

Simultaneous quantification of salivary 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate, and 2-hydroxybutyrate as possible markers of amino acid and fatty acid catabolic pathways by LC–ESI–MS/MS

  • Teruo Miyazaki1Email author,
  • Akira Honda1, 2,
  • Tadashi Ikegami2,
  • Junichi Iwamoto2,
  • Tadakuni Monma2,
  • Takeshi Hirayama2,
  • Yoshifumi Saito2,
  • Kouwa Yamashita3 and
  • Yasushi Matsuzaki2Email author
SpringerPlus20154:494

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1304-0

Received: 16 July 2015

Accepted: 2 September 2015

Published: 15 September 2015

Abstract

We have developed a highly sensitive and specific method for quantification of salivary 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB), 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB), 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate (3HMB) and 2-hydroxybutyrate (2HB), which could be new non-invasive biomarkers for catabolic pathways of fatty acids/ketogenic amino acids, valine, leucine, and methionine/threonine/α-ketobutyrate, respectively. The four hydroxybutyrates (3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB) were extracted from 5 µl of saliva, converted to 2-pyridylmethyl (2PM) ester derivatives, and measured by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in positive electrospray ionization mode. [13C4]3HB was used as an internal standard. The detection limits for the 2PM esters were <1 pg (7.9–9.6 fmol) on-column (signal-to-noise ratio = 3). Reproducibilities and recoveries of the hydroxybutyrates were validated according to one-way layout and polynomial equation, respectively. The variances between sample preparations and between measurements were calculated to be 0.45–5.28 and 0.54–3.45 %, respectively. Experiments performed using 5 µl of saliva spiked with 3.8–154.4 pmol of the four hydroxybutyrates gave recoveries of 98.5 to 108.8 %, with a mean recovery of 104.1 %. In vitro experiments in hepatocytes or skeletal muscle cells showed that addition of palmitic acid, valine, leucine or α-ketobutyrate to culture medium markedly increased the targeted hydroxybutyrate concentrations. The salivary concentration of each targeted hydroxybutyrate was positively correlated with that in serum, and the salivary levels were elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis, which is characterized by upregulated catabolism of lipids and amino acids. The proposed method is useful for quantification of salivary 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB for monitoring of catabolic activities of amino acids and fatty acids.

Background

Energy sources fluctuate among carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acids depending on nutritional and metabolic status, such as feeding, fasting, and exercise. Under conditions of fasting, endurance exercise, malnutrition or metabolic disorders including diabetes mellitus (Gaster 2009; Adams et al. 2009) and chronic liver diseases (Syed et al. 2010), catabolism of fatty acids and amino acids in the liver and skeletal muscles is stimulated to compensate for the lack of glucose supply. Fatty acids are oxidized to acetyl-CoA in the mitochondrion (β-oxidation) and used in the TCA cycle, and excess acetyl-CoA in the liver is further metabolized to ketone bodies to supply energy to non-hepatic tissues, mainly brain and skeletal muscles (Fig. 1) (Laffel 1999). Amino acids are also an important energy source under conditions lacking glucose, and ketone bodies could be produced from ketogenic amino acids in the liver in such metabolic status (Fig. 1). Because 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) is the most stable ketone body in blood, serum 3HB concentration reflects fatty acid β-oxidation as well as ketogenic amino acids catabolism in the liver (Robinson and Williamson 1980).
Fig. 1

Productive pathways of 3HB from fatty acids and ketogenic amino acids. Acyl-CoA derived from fatty acids is metabolized to Ac-CoA through β-oxidation pathway in the mitochondria. Ac-CoA in the liver is further metabolized to ketone bodies (acetoacetate, 3HB, and acetone) to supply energy to non-hepatic tissues when blood glucose level is low. Ketone bodies can be also metabolized from ketogenic amino acids, which are metabolized to intermediates in fatty acids β-oxidation, Ac-CoA or HMG-CoA via the respective catabolic pathway. 3HB is the most stable in blood among the ketone bodies. 3HB 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3HBDH 3HB dehydrogenase, Ac-CoA acetyl-CoA, AcetoAc-CoA acetoacetyl-CoA, FFA fatty acids, HMG-CoA 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA, HMGCL HMG-CoA lyase, HMGCS HMG-CoA synthase, ILE isoleucine, Inner m. mitochondria inner membrane, LEU leucine, LYS lysine, Outer m. mitochondrial outer membrane, Plasma m. plasma membrane, THR threonine, TRP tryptophan, TYR tyrosine

In humans, branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), valine (VAL), leucine (LEU) and isoleucine (ILE), are metabolized to succinyl-CoA or acetyl-CoA exclusively in skeletal muscle mitochondria and used in the TCA cycle (Shimomura et al. 2006; Platell et al. 2000; Rennie et al. 2006; Kong et al. 2012). The first two steps of the BCAA metabolic pathways are conversion of BCAAs to their CoA-derivatives, catalyzed by common mitochondrial enzymes. The CoA-derivatives of BCAAs are finally metabolized to succinyl-CoA or acetyl-CoA by their own pathways, but CoA is released from 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA only in the VAL catabolic pathway (Fig. 2). CoA-free 3-hydroxyisobutyrate (3HIB) is then released from mitochondria into extracellular fluid (Letto et al. 1986). Therefore, 3HIB is a possible biomarker of VAL catabolism in skeletal muscle (Avogaro and Bier 1989). LEU is transaminated to α-ketoisocaproate (KIC) in the first step of the mitochondrial catabolic pathway, and approximately 5 % of KIC is transferred to cytoplasm and metabolized to 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate (3HMB) by KIC dioxygenase (Fig. 2) (Sabourin and Bieber 1983). The synthesis of 3HMB is not directly associated with energy production (Zanchi et al. 2011), but this molecule can also pass through the plasma membrane and may be a biomarker for LEU catabolism in skeletal muscle.
Fig. 2

Productive pathways of 3HIB from VAL and 3HMB from LEU in BCAA metabolism. BCAAs are metabolized in the mitochondrion and the first two steps are catalyzed by common enzymes; first, BCAAs are deaminated to the respective BCKA by BCAT, and then the BCKAs are converted to the respective CoA-derivatives by the BCKDH complex, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in BCAA catabolism. The respective CoA derivatives are finally metabolized to Ac-CoA and/or Suc-CoA. 3HIB is an intermediate of VAL catabolism that is released from 3HIB-CoA by HIBCH in the mitochondrion. The small molecule 3HIB leaks into extracellular fluid. 3HMB is synthesized from KIC by KICDO in the cytoplasm as a BCKA derived from LEU. 3HMB is also detectable in extracellular fluid. 3HIB 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, 3HIB-CoA 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA, α-Kg α-ketoglutaric acid, Ac-CoA acetyl-CoA, BCAA branched-chain amino acid, BCAT branched-chain aminotransferase, BCKA branched-chain α-keto acid, BCKDH complex BCKA dehydrogenase complex, GLU glutamate, KIC α-ketoisocaproic acid, KICDO KIC dioxygenase, KMV α-keto-β-methylvaleric acid, KIV α-ketoisovaleric acid, HIBCH 3HIB-CoA hydrolase, IB-CoA isobutyryl-CoA, ILE isoleucine, Inner m. mitochondria inner membrane, IV-CoA isovaleryl-CoA, LEU leucine, MB-CoA α-methylbutyryl-CoA, MC-CoA methacrylyl-CoA, MMS methylmalonate semialdehyde, Outer m. mitochondrial outer membrane, Plasma m. plasma membrane, PP-CoA propionyl-CoA, Suc-CoA succinyl-CoA, VAL valine

In addition to production in the VAL and LEU catabolic pathways, succinyl-CoA is produced from α-ketobutyrate (αKB), which is generated when cysteine is synthesized from cystathionine by γ-cystathionase (CTH) in the methionine (MET) pathway or from threonine (THR) by serine/threonine dehydratase (SDH) (Fig. 3) (Stipanuk 2004; Greenberg et al. 1967; Yang and Roth 1985). In this pathway, some cytoplasmic αKB is further reduced to 2-hydroxybutyrate (2HB) and this compound is released into extracellular fluid. It is uncertain if increased serum 2HB directly reflects upregulated catabolism of MET/THR, but metabolome analyses have shown that 2HB is a significant biomarker associated with early stage insulin resistance (Syed Ikmal et al. 2013; Gall et al. 2010; Ferrannini et al. 2013; Tripathy et al. 2015).
Fig. 3

Productive pathway of 2HB from αKB in the sulfur-containing amino acid metabolic pathway. Cystathionine, a metabolite of homocysteine, is metabolized to αKB and CYS. αKB is transported into the mitochondrion and converted to PP-CoA, a precursor of Suc-CoA, and is also reversibly converted to 2HB by 2HBDH. 2HB leaks into extracellular fluid. 2HB 2-hydroxybutyrate, 2HBDH 2HB dehydrogenase, αKB α-ketobutyrate, αKADH α-keto acid dehydrogenase, CYS cysteine, GSH glutathione, HCY homocysteine, Inner m. mitochondrial inner membrane, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, MET methionine, Outer m. mitochondrial outer membrane, PDH pyruvate dehydrogenase, Plasma m. plasma membrane, PP-CoA propionyl-CoA, SAM S-adenosyl methionine, SAH S-adenosyl homocysteine, SER serine, SDH serine/threonine dehydrase, Suc-CoA succinyl-CoA, THR threonine

Non-invasive evaluation of metabolic status is increasingly important. Saliva has been used as a non-invasive sample in clinical examination, therapy and sport because it contains various metabolites and can be self-collected easily and safely. Plasma 3HB, 3HIB and 3HMB are measured by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Des Rosiers et al. 1988; Avogaro and Bier 1989; Nissen et al. 1990) and plasma 2HB, 3HB, and 3HMB by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) in negative electrospray ionization (N-ESI) mode (Deshpande et al. 2013; Sorensen et al. 2013; Gall et al. 2010; Ferrannini et al. 2013). However, these methods are not sufficiently sensitive for measurement of 2HB, 3HB, and 3HMB in saliva. We have previously converted another organic acid, malonic acid, into a di-(1-methyl-3-piperidinyl)malonic acid derivative for measurement by LC–MS/MS in positive electrospray ionization (P-ESI) mode (Honda et al. 2009). The introduction of a tertiary amine moiety in malonate promoted protonation and markedly increased the sensitivity. Derivatization has also been used to quantify salivary 3HB (Tsutsui et al. 2012). In the current study, we converted salivary 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB into 2-pyridylmethyl (2PM) ester derivatives for simultaneous quantification using LC-P-ESI–MS/MS. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that the levels of salivary 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB reflect their serum concentrations, which indicates that these molecules could be useful biomarkers for monitoring of catabolic pathways of amino acids and fatty acids.

Methods

Chemicals

Sodium 3HIB, sodium D-3HB, 3HMB, αKB, fenofibrate and fatty acid-free BSA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium DL-3HB-13C4 was obtained from Taiyo Nippon Sanso Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and sodium DL-2HB, 2-pyridinemethanol and 2-methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride were from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo (Tokyo, Japan). VAL, LEU, ILE, L-carnitine, palmitic acid and 4-dimethylaminopyridine were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Amino acid-free medium (Zero medium) was kindly supplied by Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). All other reagents for cell culture experiments were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Gibco®, Waltham, MA, USA). Solvents used for analysis were of analytical grade.

Sample collection

Saliva was collected from healthy volunteers (n = 15) and patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 22) by passive drool into a collection tube after mouth was washed out with water several times, and was immediately frozen at −20 °C until analysis. Blood and saliva were simultaneously collected from three healthy volunteers several times on different days to compare the concentrations of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB in saliva and serum. Blood samples were coagulated and centrifuged at 1500×g for 10 min, and serum was stored at −20 °C until analysis. In addition, to examine the influence of standing sample at room temperature (RT) on stability of four examined hydroxybutyrates, collected saliva samples from healthy volunteers (n = 4) were aliquoted into a microcentrifuge tube (1.5 mL, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and kept in incubator set at 25 °C for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 h, and then, transferred at −20 °C.

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center (#12–34).

Sample preparation

Before analysis, saliva was thawed at RT and centrifuged at 3000×g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove denatured mucins and food particles (Tsutsui et al. 2012). Five µL of the supernatant of saliva, serum, or culture medium was placed in the microcentrifuge tube, and 769 pmol (100 ng) of sodium DL-3HB-13C4 in 100 μL of acetonitrile–water (19:1, v/v) was added as an internal standard. The sample tube was vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 2000×g for 1 min. After centrifugation, deproteinized clear liquid phase was collected and evaporated to dryness at 55 °C under a nitrogen stream. Conversion of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB into 2PM ester derivatives was performed with some modifications of Shiina’s method for synthesis of carboxylic esters (Shiina et al. 2002). The reagent mixture consisted of 2-methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride (67 mg), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (20 mg), pyridine (900 μL) and 2-pyridinemethanol (100 μL). The freshly prepared reagent mixture (50 μL) was added to the sample extracts and the resulting mixture was allowed to stand at RT for 30 min. After addition of 1 mL of diethyl ether, the mixture was vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 700×g for 1 min. The clear supernatant was collected and evaporated at 55 °C under nitrogen. The residue was redissolved in 100 μL of 1 % formic acid in water and centrifuged again at 700×g for 1 min. The supernatant was collected and a 2-µL aliquot was injected into the LC–MS/MS system.

Determination of 2PM-3HB/3HIB/3HMB/2HB by LC-P-ESI–MS/MS

The LC–ESI–MS/MS system consisted of a TSQ Vantage triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an HESI-II probe and a Prominence ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UFLC) system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Chromatographic separation was performed using a Hypersil GOLD aQ column (150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 40 °C. Initially, the mobile phase was acetonitrile–water (1:19, v/v) containing 0.2 % formic acid and was used at a flow rate of 300 µL/min for 5 min. After 5 min, the mobile phase was switched to 0.2 % formic acid in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 300 μL/min for an additional 7 min. The general MS/MS conditions were as follows: spray voltage, 3000 V; vaporizer temperature, 450 °C; sheath gas (nitrogen) pressure, 50 psi; auxiliary gas (nitrogen) flow, 15 arbitrary units; ion transfer capillary temperature, 220 °C; collision gas (argon) pressure, 1.0 mTorr; collision energy, 15 V; and ion polarity, positive; and selected reaction monitoring (SRM), m/z 196 → m/z 110 for 2PM-3HB, 2PM-3HIB and 2PM-2HB, m/z 210 → m/z 192 for 2PM-3HMB, and m/z 200 → m/z 110 for 2PM-[13C4]3HB.

Calibration curves

Stock solutions of sodium D-3HB (40 ng/20 μL), sodium 3HIB (40 ng/20 μL), 3HMB (40 ng/20 μL) and sodium DL-2HB (40 ng/20 μL) for construction of calibration curves were prepared in acetonitrile–water (19:1, v/v). These solutions were further diluted with the same solvent to give a series of working standard solutions (1–200 ng/100 μL for 3HB, 0.1–40 ng/100 μL for 3HIB, 0.1–20 ng/100 μL for 3HMB and 2HB). Sodium DL-3HΒ-13C4 (100 ng) was added as an internal standard to each standard solution and the mixture was evaporated to dryness, derivatized and quantified, as described above.

Cell culture

Differentiated, nontransformed AML12 cells from transforming growth factor α-overexpressing transgenic mice (Wu et al. 1994) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used as a non-tumor mouse hepatocyte cell line. AML12 cells were cultured on a 24-well plate until confluent (Honda et al. 2011a). For evaluation of hepatic β-oxidation, the growth medium was replaced by DMEM containing 1.0 g/L glucose, 1 mM l-carnitine and 200 µM palmitic acid dissolved in 10 % (w/v) fatty acid-free BSA with or without 100 µM fenofibrate, a synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) ligand. After 24 h, the 3HB level in the culture medium was measured. Confluent cells seeded on a 24-well plate were also exposed to 20 mM MET, cystathionine, THR or αKB in Zero medium containing 925 mg/L NaHCO3, 4.5 g/L glucose and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Honda et al. 2011b) for 24 h. Serine (20 mM) was also added to the medium containing MET. After exposure, the 2HB level in the culture medium was measured.

Growth of human primary skeletal muscle myoblasts isolated from the rectus abdominus muscle (ZenBio, Inc., NC, USA) and differentiation into myotubes were carried out on a 6-well plate following the recommended procedure of the manufacturer (ZenBio, Inc.). The differentiation medium was replaced by Zero medium containing 2 mM VAL, LEU or ILE (Honda et al. 2011b). 3HIB and 3HMB levels in the medium were measured after 24 h. All cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5 % CO2 and 95 % air.

Statistics

The linearity of calibration curves was analyzed by simple linear regression. Reproducibility was analyzed by one-way ANOVA. The estimated amount ± 95 % confidence limit was obtained as an index of precision (Taguchi 1986). To calculate these values, orthogonal regression analysis was performed in a recovery study. The significance of differences between the results in different groups was evaluated by unpaired Student two-tailed t test or non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. For all analyses, significance was accepted at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using JMP software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

MS, MS/MS and SRM

Typical P-ESI mass spectra for the 2PM esters of 3HB and 3HMB are shown in Fig. 4b, d. 2PM-3HB and 2PM-3HMB exhibited [M + H]+ ions at m/z 196 and m/z 210, respectively, as the base peaks. In MS/MS spectra using these base peaks as precursor ions, the [C5H4NCH2OH + H]+ ion was observed at m/z 110 as the most prominent peak (Fig. 4a, c). The [M-H2O + H]+ ion at m/z 192 was the second most prominent peak for 2PM-3HMB (Fig. 4c). The mass spectra and MS/MS spectra for 2PM-3HIB and 2PM-2HB were similar to those for 2PM-3HB. SRM chromatograms obtained for m/z 210 → m/z 110 and m/z 210 → m/z 192 were compared for determination of 2PM-3HMB, and the latter showed a better signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) for biological samples. The detection limits of the 2PM esters of the four hydroxybutyrates by SRM were <1 pg (7.9–9.6 fmol) on-column (S/N = 3).
Fig. 4

Typical P-ESI mass spectra (b, d) and product ion mass spectra (a, c) for 2PM-3HB (m/z 196) and 2PM-3HMB (m/z 210). The mass spectra of 2PM-3HIB and 2PM-2HB were almost the same as 2PM-3HB. The LC–MS/MS conditions are described in the “Methods”. P-ESI positive electrospray ionization, 2PM 2-pyridylmethyl. See legends of Figs. 1, 2, and 3 for other abbreviations

Calibration curves

Calibration curves were established for 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB and 2HB (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Different amounts of authentic hydroxybutyrates (0–200 ng for 3HB, 0–40 ng for 3HIB, 0–20 ng for 3HMB and 2HB) were mixed with 100 ng (769 pmol) of [13C4]3HB as internal standard. The amount of each hydroxybutyrate and the peak-area ratio to the internal standard measured by SRM were plotted on the abscissa and ordinate, respectively. Good linearity was found based on simple linear regression: 3HB: y = 0.0092x + 0.0020, n = 8, r2 = 0.9998, P < 0.0001; 3HIB: y = 0.0211x + 0.0032, n = 7, r2 = 0.9998, P < 0.0001; 3HMB: y = 0.0298x + 0.0043, n = 6, r2 = 0.9991, P < 0.0001; 2HB: y = 0.0322x + 0.0038, n = 6, r2 = 0.9993, P < 0.0001.

Representative SRM chromatograms

Selected reaction monitoring chromatograms of 2PM esters of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, 2HB and [13C4]3HB obtained with 5 μL of saliva from a healthy human subject are shown in Fig. 5. The peak-area ratio of each 2PM ester to 2PM-[13C4]3HB was calculated from the chromatograms and the amount was determined using this ratio on the calibration curve. The peaks for 2PM-3HB, 2PM-3HIB, 2PM-2HB and 2PM-3HMB on the chromatogram correspond to ~650 fmol (6.5 µM), ~350 fmol (3.5 µM), ~450 fmol (4.5 µM) and ~70 fmol (0.7 µM), respectively.
Fig. 5

Representative SRM chromatograms of 2PM-derivatized 3HB, 2HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB in 5 µL of saliva from a healthy human. a m/z 196 g m/z 110 for 2PM-3HB, 2PM-3HIB and 2PM-2HB. b m/z 210 g m/z 192 for 2PM-3HMB. c m/z 200 g m/z 110 for 2PM-[13C4]3HB. The peaks for 3HB, 3HIB, 2HB and 3HMB in chromatograms correspond to 650 fmol (6.5 µM), 350 fmol (3.5 µM), 450 fmol (4.5 µM) and 70 fmol (0.7 µM), respectively. The numbers above the SRM ion pair represent the full scale of the chromatogram. SRM selected reaction monitoring; and see legends of Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 for other abbreviations

Precision and accuracy of the method

The following studies were performed to determine the precision and accuracy of the method using saliva from a healthy human subject. Reproducibility was investigated by analysis of quadruplicate samples by LC-P-ESI-SRM in triplicate (Table 1, Additional file 2: Tables S1, S2). The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, in which analytical errors were divided into two sources: sample preparation and SRM measurement. Variances were not considered to be attributable to the sample preparation because the errors during sample preparation were not significantly larger than those between the measurements. The inter-assay coefficients of variation for between- and within-sample variations of the four hydroxybutyrates were 0.45–5.28 and 0.54–3.45 %, respectively.
Table 1

Reproducibility of the quantification of each hydroxybutyrate in human saliva

Hydroxybutyrate

Mean ± SD (n = 12) (pmol)

Relative SD

Sample preparation (%)

Error (SRM) (%)

3HB

56.0 ± 0.30

0.48

0.54

3HIB

49.0 ± 0.36

0.45

0.79

3HMB

3.7 ± 0.10

1.70

2.98

2HB

19.5 ± 0.84

5.28

3.45

Each butyrate was quantified in 5 µL of saliva collected from healthy subjects. Four samples were prepared and quantified in triplicate by HPLC–MS/MS. The results were analyzed by a one-way layout, in which the analytical errors were divided into two sources: sample preparation and SRM measurement

3HB 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3HIB 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, 3HMB 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate, 2HB 2-hydroxybutyrate

In recovery experiments, known amounts of each targeted hydroxybutyrate (a, 2a, 3a; a = 51.2 pmol for 3HB, 50.0 pmol for 3HIB, 3.8 pmol for 3HMB, and 19.2 pmol for 2HB) were spiked into 5-μL aliquots of saliva samples (n = 2). After clean-up and derivatization, SRM was conducted in triplicate for each sample. The mean recoveries were 103.7 % for 3HB (102.1–104.6 %), 99.6 % for 3HIB (98.5–100.7 %), 106.3 % for 3HMB (104.8–107.9 %), and 106.8 % for 2HB (108.7–118.8 %) (Table 2). The amount of each endogenous hydroxybutyrate found in unspiked 5-μL saliva aliquots was within the 95 % confidence limit for the respective estimated amount calculated by orthogonal regression analysis, which also constituted an index for the precision and accuracy of the method.
Table 2

Recovery of each hydroxybutyrate from human saliva

Hydroxybutyrate

Amount added (pmol)

Average recoverya [mean ± SD (n)] (%)

3HB

51.2

103.4 ± 3.6 (6)

103.2

104.6 ± 1.6 (6)

154.4

102.1 ± 1.1 (6)

3HIB

50.0

98.5 ± 2.0 (6)

100.0

99.7 ± 1.0 (6)

150.0

100.7 ± 1.1 (6)

3HMB

3.8

104.8 ± 1.5 (6)

7.6

107.7 ± 0.6 (6)

11.4

107.9 ± 0.9 (6)

2HB

19.2

108.8 ± 5.4 (6)

38.4

118.8 ± 2.2 (6)

57.6

108.7 ± 2.5 (6)

Known amounts of each hydroxybutyrate were spiked into 5 µL of human saliva collected from healthy subjects before sample preparation

aRecovery (%) = (amount found − \(\bar{X}_{0}\))/amount added × 100; \(\bar{X}_{0}\) value was obtained from Table 1

Cell culture experiments

3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB levels in culture medium were measured following treatment of cells with different compounds. The level of 3HB, a possible marker of hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation, was significantly increased when hepatocytes were exposed to palmitic acid (Fig. 6a). Addition of fenofibrate with palmitic acid stimulated accumulation of 3HB in the medium. Treatment of myotubes with VAL and LEU caused significant elevation of the concentrations of 3HIB and 3HMB, respectively, in the medium compared with untreated myotubes or treatment with other BCAAs (Fig. 6b). Addition of other amino acids to the medium did not cause a significant change in the 3HIB or 3HMB level in the culture medium (data not shown). In exposure of hepatocytes to αKB or its precursors (MET, THR or cystathionine), only αKB led to accumulation of 2HB in the medium (Fig. 6c).
Fig. 6

Concentrations of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB in cell culture media after addition of precursor compounds. a AML12 cells were treated with 200 µM palmitic acid or 200 µM palmitic acid plus 100 µM fenofibrate for 24 h. 3HB concentrations were compared with that in untreated cells. b Myotubes were treated with 2 mM VAL, LEU or ILE for 24 h. 3HIB and 3HMB concentrations were compared with those in untreated cells. c AML12 cells were treated with 2 mM MET plus SER, cystathionine, THR or αKB for 24 h, and 2HB concentrations were compared among these conditions. Palmitic A palmitic acid. See legends of Figs. 1, 2, and 3 for other abbreviations. Data are from four independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA multiple comparison and a post hoc Bonferroni multiple comparison test. P < 0.001. All ANOVA P values were <0.0001

Human studies

Saliva collected from healthy volunteers was stood at RT (25 °C) for various times, and then, stored at −20 °C until analysis. After standing at RT, 3HB and 3HIB concentrations in saliva were unchanged for up to 24 h (Fig. 7). Similarly, 3HMB concentration in saliva was mostly kept for up to 24 h, although some variations were observed. On the other hand, 2HB concentration in saliva begun to decrease from an hour after standing at RT, and decreased significantly over one-third fold after four hours (Fig. 7). Therefore, saliva samples were stored at −20 °C immediately after collection in all other experiments.
Fig. 7

Influence of standing saliva samples at RT on stability of 3HB (a), 3HIB (b), 3HMB (c), and 2HB (d). Saliva samples collected from healthy volunteers (n = 4) were aliquoted into seven microcentrifuge tubes and standing at RT for various times (0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 h). Thereafter, the saliva samples were stored at −20 °C until analysis. RT room temperature. See legends of Figs. 1, 2, and 3 for other abbreviations. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA multiple comparison and a post hoc Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. ANOVA P values are a P = 0.9949, b P = 0.9968, c P = 0.7058, and d P < 0.0001. *P < 0.05, P < 0.0001 vs. 0-time control

Serum and saliva were collected from three healthy subjects repeatedly on different days. Significant correlations of the serum and saliva concentrations were found for all four hydroxybutyrates (3HB: r2 = 0.7034, P < 0.0001; 3HIB: r2 = 0.6930, P < 0.0001; 3HMB: r2 = 0.2088, P < 0.05; and 2HB: r2 = 0.4599, P < 0.001) (Fig. 8). These results suggest that the salivary levels reflect the serum levels of these examined hydroxybutyrates. The levels of 3HB, 3HIB, and 3HMB in saliva were significantly higher in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with healthy controls (Fig. 9); and that of 2HB tended to be higher in liver cirrhosis, but the difference was not significant.
Fig. 8

Correlation of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB concentrations between serum and saliva. a 3HB 3-hydroxybutyrate, y = 10.8x − 13.6 (r2 = 0.7034, P < 0.0001), b 3HIB 3-hydroxyisobutyrate, y = 15.4x − 1.2 (r2 = 0.6930, P < 0.0001), c 3HMB 3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate, y = 4.2x − 0.8 (r2 = 0.2088, P < 0.05), d 2HB 2-hydroxybutyrate, y = 8.7x − 18.2 (r2 = 0.4599, P < 0.001)

Fig. 9

Concentrations of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB in saliva from patients with liver cirrhosis and healthy controls. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis by unpaired Student t test or non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, P < 0.0001. See legends of Figs. 1, 2, and 3 for abbreviations

Discussion

We established a sensitive and specific new LC-P-ESI–MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of four hydroxybutyrates (3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB) in human saliva, serum, and cell culture medium. Several methods for quantification of some hydroxybutyrates using LC-N-ESI–MS/MS have been developed (Deshpande et al. 2013; Sorensen et al. 2013). However, these methods have detection limits for 3HMB and 3HB of 0.3 µM (Deshpande et al. 2013) and 3 µM (Sorensen et al. 2013), respectively, and a >100-µL blood sample is required for quantification. The concentrations of the four examined hydroxybutyrates in saliva are 0.7–6.5 µM (Fig. 5) and quantification of these compounds in a small volume of saliva is difficult. Indeed, our preliminary study showed that only trace amounts of the four hydroxybutyrates in saliva were detected by LC-N-ESI–MS/MS without derivatization.

Conversion of the four hydroxybutyrates into 2PM ester derivatives gave excellent peak shapes, [M + H]+ ions as base peaks in P-ESI–MS, and detection limits by SRM that were approximately 50 times lower than those for underivatized hydroxybutyrates in N-ESI mode (data not shown). Using this method, the four hydroxybutyrates in saliva were easily quantified. Recently, Tsutsui et al. determined 3HB in human saliva by LC-P-ESI–MS/MS after derivatizing with (S)(+)-1-(2-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-pyrrolidine (Tsutsui et al. 2012). This method is also sensitive and enantiomeric separation of d- and l-3HB was achieved. However, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB that are derived from amino acids were not quantified and 100 µL of saliva was used. Our method requires only 5 µL of saliva and can be applied to determination of the four hydroxybutyrates in lachrymal fluid collected with filter paper. Saliva and lachrymal fluid can be obtained non-invasively from humans and the concentrations of our four targeted hydroxybutyrates were significantly correlated among serum, saliva, and lachrymal fluid (data not shown). We chose saliva to monitor amino acids and lipid catabolic pathways because this can be more easily collected compared to lachrymal fluid. In addition, this high sensitive method can be applied to quantify the four hydroxybutyrates in other biological samples including serum, plasma, and urine that contain higher levels of them. Indeed, serum levels of 3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB were quantified in the present study (Fig. 8). In saliva, 3HB, 3HIB, and 3HMB concentrations were stabile at RT for at least 24 h (Fig. 7). However, 2HB concentration in saliva was decreased soon in several hours by standing at RT. The reason is unclear why salivary 2HB is unstable at RT, but saliva sample needs to freeze immediately after collection until analysis.

Our cell culture experiments confirmed that the four targeted hydroxybutyrates are metabolites of lipid and amino acids; i.e. 3HB was synthesized by hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation, 3HIB and 3HMB by skeletal muscular BCAA catabolism, and 2HB in the MET/THR/αKB pathways. In low nutritional states such as fasting, metabolic disorders and endurance exercise, 3HB serves as an excellent fuel for non-hepatic tissues and the serum level of 3HB is increased by stimulated hepatic β-oxidation as well as ketogenic amino acids catabolism (Laffel 1999). Elevation of serum 3HIB has also been found in fasted and diabetic subjects because BCAAs are utilized as another energy fuel in a low nutritional state (Avogaro and Bier 1989). The early steps in catabolism of the three BCAAs are thought to be concurrent reactions because the first two steps share the same enzymes: branched-chain aminotransferase and rate-limiting branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (BCKDH) complex (Shimomura et al. 2006). Therefore, the VAL metabolite 3HIB is thought to be a common biomarker for BCAA catabolism in skeletal muscle. Indeed, our data show that salivary levels of 3HB, 3HIB and 3HMB increased in parallel in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with those in healthy controls. Liver cirrhosis causes an imbalance of whole body energy metabolism, including impaired glucose tolerance, ketoacidosis and insulin resistance (Moriwaki et al. 2004). In skeletal muscles, BCAAs are used for compensatory energy production, and consequently protein breakdown and muscle atrophy develop in patients with liver cirrhosis (Shimomura et al. 2006; Platell et al. 2000; Moriwaki et al. 2004).

2HB is synthesized from αKB by a NADH-dependent 2-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (2HBDH) in cytosol, and αKB is metabolized to propionyl-CoA and then to succinyl-CoA in mitochondria. Therefore, an elevated 2HB concentration appears to reflect increased activity of 2HBDH and/or decreased mitochondrial metabolism of αKB (Fig. 3). 2HBDH is an isozyme of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and production of 2HB from αKB is analogous to that of lactate from pyruvate (Landaas and Pettersen 1975). Metabolism of αKB to propionyl-CoA in mitochondria is thought to be catalyzed by a specific NAD+-dependent αKB dehydrogenase complex or other α-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes, including pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and BCKDH (Linn et al. 1969b; Bremer 1969; Johnson and Connelly 1972). This activity is inhibited by phosphorylation of the E1 component of the complexes by enzymes such as pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase and BCKDH kinase (Kerbey et al. 1976). Gene expression of these kinases is upregulated by an elevated mitochondrial NADH/NAD ratio (Johnson and Connelly 1972; Linn et al. 1969a; Bremer 1969). Thus, elevation of this ratio increases the cellular αKB concentration through inhibition of αKB and α-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes, and an elevated cytosolic NADH/NAD ratio stimulates 2HB production through activation of 2HBDH.

αKB and pyruvate are structurally similar monocarboxylic keto acids and both are substrates of PDH; therefore, αKB may interfere with glucose metabolism by competitive inhibition of PDH (Lapointe and Olson 1985; Bremer 1969). αKB also inhibits transport of pyruvate into mitochondria (Paradies and Papa 1975). Brass showed that αKB significantly inhibited 14CO2 generation and [14C]glucose formation from [14C]pyruvate in rat hepatocytes, which implies that αKB reduces synthesis of acetyl-CoA and gluconeogenesis (Brass 1986). Early literature showed increased urinary and serum levels of 2HB in patients with various clinical disorders combined with ketoacidosis and lactic acidosis (Landaas and Pettersen 1975), but more recent studies suggest that serum 2HB is a significant biomarker associated with insulin sensitivity, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases (Syed Ikmal et al. 2013; Gall et al. 2010). In the current study, the salivary 2HB concentration in cirrhotic patients tended to be higher than that in healthy subjects. In cell culture, 2HB was produced by cultured hepatocytes when αKB, but not its precursors (MET, cystathionine or THR), was added. Therefore, increased 2HB levels in blood and saliva may reflect decreased mitochondrial metabolism of αKB, rather than increased catabolism of MET, cystathionine or THR. Serum 2HB might be an indicator of insulin resistance because accumulation of αKB results in elevation of 2HB and disturbance of mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism.

Conclusion

In this study, four hydroxybutyrates (3HB, 3HIB, 3HMB, and 2HB) were converted to 2PM esters and measured by LC-P-ESI–MS/MS. This highly sensitive method made it possible to quantify concentrations of the four hydroxybutyrates in a small volume of human saliva, which can be conveniently used in place of serum. The four targeted hydroxybutyrates are intermediates in amino acid and fatty acid catabolic pathways that produce acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA in liver and skeletal muscles. Therefore, these four hydroxybutyrates are possible biomarkers for metabolic profiling of amino acids and lipids. This non-invasive method is applicable in clinical diagnosis, early detection of metabolic diseases, and evaluation of drug therapy; in nutritional support for patients and athletes; and in the anti-aging field.

Abbreviations

2HB: 

2-hydroxybutyrate

2HBDH: 

2-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase

2PM: 

2-pyridylmethyl

3HB: 

3-hydroxybutyrate

3HBDH: 

3HB dehydrogenase

3HIB: 

3-hydroxyisobutyrate

3HIB-CoA: 

3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA

3HMB: 

3-hydroxy-3-methylbutyrate

αKADH: 

α-keto acid dehydrogenase

αKB: 

α-ketobutyrate

α-Kg: 

α-ketoglutaric acid

Ac-CoA: 

acetyl-CoA

AcetoAc-CoA: 

acetoacetyl-CoA

BCAA: 

branched-chain amino acid

BCAT: 

branched-chain aminotransferase

BCKA: 

branched-chain α-keto acid

BCKDH complex: 

branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase complex

CTH: 

γ-cystathionase

CYS: 

cysteine

FFA: 

fatty acids

GC–MS: 

gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

GLU: 

glutamate

GSH: 

glutathione

HCY: 

homocysteine

Inner m.: 

mitochondrial inner membrane

KIC: 

α-ketoisocaproic acid

KICDO: 

KIC dioxygenase

KMV: 

α-keto-β-methylvaleric acid

KIV: 

α-ketoisovaleric acid

HIBCH: 

3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase

HMG-CoA: 

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA

HMGCL: 

HMG-CoA lyase

HMGCS: 

HMG-CoA synthase

IB-CoA: 

isobutyryl-CoA

ILE: 

isoleucine

Inner m.: 

mitochondria inner membrane

IS: 

internal standard

IV-CoA: 

isovaleryl-CoA

LC–MS/MS: 

liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

LDH: 

lactate dehydrogenase

LEU: 

leucine

LYS: 

lysine

MET: 

methionine

MB-CoA: 

α-methylbutyryl-CoA

MC-CoA: 

methacrylyl-CoA

MMS: 

methylmalonate semialdehyde

N-ESI: 

negative electrospray ionization

Outer m.: 

mitochondrial outer membrane

Palmitic A: 

palmitic acid

PDH: 

pyruvate dehydrogenase

P-ESI: 

positive electrospray ionization

Plasma m.: 

plasma membrane

PPARα: 

peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α

PP-CoA: 

propionyl-CoA

RT: 

room temperature

SAM: 

S-adenosyl methionine

SAH: 

S-adenosyl homocysteine

SER: 

serine

SDH: 

serine/threonine dehydrase

S/N: 

signal-to-noise ratio

SRM: 

selected reaction monitoring

Suc-CoA: 

succinyl-CoA

THR: 

threonine

TRP: 

tryptophan

TYR: 

tyrosine

UFLC: 

ultra-fast liquid chromatography

VAL: 

valine

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

T Miyazaki and AH entirely contributed to this manuscript including significant manuscript writer, concept and design, data acquisition, and data analysis and interpretation. TI, JI, T Monma, TH, and YS contributed for collection and preparation of clinical sample from the liver cirrhotic patients and controls. KY was an advisor for sample preparation and analysis by HPLC–ESI–MS/MS. YM has contributed as significant manuscript reviewer/reviser and to clinical sample collection.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Kakenhi Grants [21790633 (Miyazaki 2009–11), 23590992 (Matsuzaki 2011–14), 25750334 (Miyazaki 2013–15), 25461013 (Ikegami 2013–15), 26461022 (Honda 2014–16), 15K00849 (Iwamoto 2015–17) and 15K09026 (Matsuzaki 2015–17)] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We grateful thank to Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., LTD. (Tokyo) for kindly gift of an amino acid-free medium (ZERO medium).

Competing interests

The authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interest to declare.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Joint Research Center, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center
(2)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center
(3)
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Kampo Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy

References

  1. Adams SH, Hoppel CL, Lok KH, Zhao L, Wong SW, Minkler PE, Hwang DH, Newman JW, Garvey WT (2009) Plasma acylcarnitine profiles suggest incomplete long-chain fatty acid beta-oxidation and altered tricarboxylic acid cycle activity in type 2 diabetic African–American women. J Nutr 139(6):1073–1081. doi:10.3945/jn.108.103754 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Avogaro A, Bier DM (1989) Contribution of 3-hydroxyisobutyrate to the measurement of 3-hydroxybutyrate in human plasma: comparison of enzymatic and gas-liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry assays in normal and in diabetic subjects. J Lipid Res 30(11):1811–1817Google Scholar
  3. Brass EP (1986) Effect of alpha-ketobutyrate on palmitic acid and pyruvate metabolism in isolated rat hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 888(1):18–24. doi:10.1016/0167-4889(86)90065-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremer J (1969) Pyruvate dehydrogenase, substrate specificity and product inhibition. Eur J Biochem 8(4):535–540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Des Rosiers C, Montgomery J, Desrochers S, Garneau M, David F, Mamer O, Brunengraber H (1988) Interference of 3-hydroxyisobutyrate with measurements of ketone body concentration and isotopic enrichment by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 173(1):96–105. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(88)90165-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Deshpande P, Jie Z, Subbarayan R, Mamidi VK, Chunduri RH, Das T, Shreeram S (2013) Development and validation of LC–MS/MS method for the estimation of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. Biomed Chromatogr 27(2):142–147. doi:10.1002/bmc.2758 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrannini E, Natali A, Camastra S, Nannipieri M, Mari A, Adam KP, Milburn MV, Kastenmuller G, Adamski J, Tuomi T, Lyssenko V, Groop L, Gall WE (2013) Early metabolic markers of the development of dysglycemia and type 2 diabetes and their physiological significance. Diabetes 62(5):1730–1737. doi:10.2337/db12-0707 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gall WE, Beebe K, Lawton KA, Adam KP, Mitchell MW, Nakhle PJ, Ryals JA, Milburn MV, Nannipieri M, Camastra S, Natali A, Ferrannini E (2010) α-Hydroxybutyrate is an early biomarker of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in a nondiabetic population. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010883 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaster M (2009) Reduced lipid oxidation in myotubes established from obese and type 2 diabetic subjects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382(4):766–770. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.102 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg DM, Vogel HJ, Hokin LE (1967) Metabolic pathways, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Honda A, Yamashita K, Hara T, Ikegami T, Miyazaki T, Shirai M, Xu G, Numazawa M, Matsuzaki Y (2009) Highly sensitive quantification of key regulatory oxysterols in biological samples by LC–ESI-MS/MS. J Lipid Res 50(2):350–357. doi:10.1194/jlr.D800040-JLR200 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Honda A, Miyazaki T, Ikegami T, Iwamoto J, Maeda T, Hirayama T, Saito Y, Teramoto T, Matsuzaki Y (2011a) Cholesterol 25-hydroxylation activity of CYP3A. J Lipid Res 52(8):1509–1516. doi:10.1194/jlr.M014084 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Honda M, Takehana K, Sakai A, Tagata Y, Shirasaki T, Nishitani S, Muramatsu T, Yamashita T, Nakamoto Y, Mizukoshi E, Sakai Y, Nakamura M, Shimakami T, Yi M, Lemon SM, Suzuki T, Wakita T, Kaneko S (2011b) Malnutrition impairs interferon signaling through mTOR and FoxO pathways in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 141(1):128–140. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.051 (140 e121–122) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson WA, Connelly JL (1972) Studies on the mutual influences of substrates on bovine -keto acid metabolism. Biochemistry 11(13):2416–2421View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerbey AL, Randle PJ, Cooper RH, Whitehouse S, Pask HT, Denton RM (1976) Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase in rat heart. Mechanism of regulation of proportions of dephosphorylated and phosphorylated enzyme by oxidation of fatty acids and ketone bodies and of effects of diabetes: role of coenzyme A, acetyl-coenzyme A and reduced and oxidized nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide. Biochem J 154(2):327–348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong B, Wang L, Chiang JY, Zhang Y, Klaassen CD, Guo GL (2012) Mechanism of tissue-specific farnesoid X receptor in suppressing the expression of genes in bile-acid synthesis in mice. Hepatology 56(3):1034–1043. doi:10.1002/hep.25740 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Laffel L (1999) Ketone bodies: a review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 15(6):412–426. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-7560(199911/12)15:6<412:AID-DMRR72>3.0.CO;2-8 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Landaas S, Pettersen JE (1975) Clinical conditions associated with urinary excretion of 2-hydroxybutyric acid. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 35(3):259–266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lapointe DS, Olson MS (1985) alpha-Ketobutyrate metabolism in perfused rat liver: regulation of alpha-ketobutyrate decarboxylation and effects of alpha-ketobutyrate on pyruvate dehydrogenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 242(2):417–429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Letto J, Brosnan ME, Brosnan JT (1986) Valine metabolism. Gluconeogenesis from 3-hydroxyisobutyrate. Biochem J 240(3):909–912View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Linn TC, Pettit FH, Hucho F, Reed LJ (1969a) Alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes. XI. Comparative studies of regulatory properties of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes from kidney, heart, and liver mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64(1):227–234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Linn TC, Pettit FH, Reed LJ (1969b) Alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes. X. Regulation of the activity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from beef kidney mitochondria by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 62(1):234–241View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Moriwaki H, Miwa Y, Tajika M, Kato M, Fukushima H, Shiraki M (2004) Branched-chain amino acids as a protein- and energy-source in liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 313(2):405–409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nissen S, Van Koevering M, Webb D (1990) Analysis of beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl butyrate in plasma by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 188(1):17–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Paradies G, Papa S (1975) The transport of monocarboxylic oxoacids in rat liver mitochondria. FEBS Lett 52(1):149–152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Platell C, Kong SE, McCauley R, Hall JC (2000) Branched-chain amino acids. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(7):706–717View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rennie MJ, Bohe J, Smith K, Wackerhage H, Greenhaff P (2006) Branched-chain amino acids as fuels and anabolic signals in human muscle. J Nutr 136(1 Suppl):264S–268SGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson AM, Williamson DH (1980) Physiological roles of ketone bodies as substrates and signals in mammalian tissues. Physiol Rev 60(1):143–187Google Scholar
  29. Sabourin PJ, Bieber LL (1983) Formation of beta-hydroxyisovalerate by an alpha-ketoisocaproate oxygenase in human liver. Metabolism 32(2):160–164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shiina I, Ibuka R, Kubota M (2002) A new condensation reaction for the synthesis of carboxylic esters from nearly equimolar amounts of carboxylic acids and alcohols using 2-methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride. Chem Lett 3:286–287View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shimomura Y, Yamamoto Y, Bajotto G, Sato J, Murakami T, Shimomura N, Kobayashi H, Mawatari K (2006) Nutraceutical effects of branched-chain amino acids on skeletal muscle. J Nutr 136(2):529S–532SGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorensen LK, Rittig NF, Holmquist EF, Jorgensen KA, Jorgensen JO, Moller N, Johannsen M (2013) Simultaneous determination of beta-hydroxybutyrate and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate in human whole blood using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Biochem 46(18):1877–1883. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.08.011 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Stipanuk MH (2004) Sulfur amino acid metabolism: pathways for production and removal of homocysteine and cysteine. Annu Rev Nutr 24:539–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132418 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Syed Ikmal SI, Zaman Huri H, Vethakkan SR, Wan Ahmad WA (2013) Potential biomarkers of insulin resistance and atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Endocrinol 2013:698567. doi:10.1155/2013/698567 Google Scholar
  35. Syed GH, Amako Y, Siddiqui A (2010) Hepatitis C virus hijacks host lipid metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 21(1):33–40. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2009.07.005 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and process. Asian Productivity Organization, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  37. Tripathy D, Cobb JE, Gall W, Adam KP, George T, Schwenke DC, Banerji M, Bray GA, Buchanan TA, Clement SC, Henry RR, Kitabchi AE, Mudaliar S, Ratner RE, Stentz FB, Reaven PD, Musi N, Ferrannini E, DeFronzo RA (2015) A novel insulin resistance index to monitor changes in insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance: the ACT NOW Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3824 Google Scholar
  38. Tsutsui H, Mochizuki T, Maeda T, Noge I, Kitagawa Y, Min JZ, Todoroki K, Inoue K, Toyo’oka T (2012) Simultaneous determination of DL-lactic acid and DL-3-hydroxybutyric acid enantiomers in saliva of diabetes mellitus patients by high-throughput LC–ESI-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 404(6–7):1925–1934. doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6320-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu JC, Merlino G, Fausto N (1994) Establishment and characterization of differentiated, nontransformed hepatocyte cell lines derived from mice transgenic for transforming growth factor alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(2):674–678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang W, Roth KS (1985) Defect in α-ketobutyrate metabolism: a new inborn error. Clin Chim Acta 145(2):173–182View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zanchi NE, Gerlinger-Romero F, Guimaraes-Ferreira L, de Siqueira Filho MA, Felitti V, Lira FS, Seelaender M, Lancha AH Jr (2011) HMB supplementation: clinical and athletic performance-related effects and mechanisms of action. Amino Acids 40(4):1015–1025. doi:10.1007/s00726-010-0678-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Miyazaki et al. 2015