- Open Access
Factors affecting RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry: empirical evidence from China
© The Author(s) 2016
- Received: 29 October 2015
- Accepted: 21 November 2016
- Published: 28 November 2016
We conducted an exploratory investigation of factors influencing the adoption of radio frequency identification (RFID) methods in the agricultural product distribution industry. Through a literature review and field research, and based on the technology–organization–environment (TOE) theoretical framework, this paper analyzes factors influencing RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry in reference to three contexts: technological, organizational, and environmental contexts. An empirical analysis of the TOE framework was conducted by applying structural equation modeling based on actual data from a questionnaire survey on the agricultural product distribution industry in China. The results show that employee resistance and uncertainty are not supported by the model. Technological compatibility, perceived effectiveness, organizational size, upper management support, trust between enterprises, technical knowledge, competitive pressure and support from the Chinese government, which are supported by the model, have significantly positive effects on RFID adoption. Meanwhile, organizational size has the strongest positive effect, while competitive pressure levels have the smallest effect. Technological complexities and costs have significantly negative effects on RFID adoption, with cost being the most significantly negative influencing factor. These research findings will afford enterprises in the agricultural products supply chain with a stronger understanding of the factors that influence RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry. In addition, these findings will help enterprises remain aware of how these factors affect RFID adoption and will thus help enterprises make more accurate and rational decisions by promoting RFID application in the agricultural product distribution industry.
- Technology adoption
- Agricultural product distribution industry
- Structural equation modeling (SEM)
- Technology–organization–environment (TOE)
The safety of agricultural products has become a central societal issue, as safety not only affects consumer health but can also devastate agricultural produce enterprises and the entire agricultural supply chain, seriously affecting the sustainable development of agricultural product industries and societal stability. As an important aspect of food safety management, the traceability of agricultural products plays a key role. China in particular is becoming the world’s largest food producer and consumer. Related policies that involve setting up uniform tracing information platforms and enacting standards are promoted widely. However, owing to the lengthy and dynamic nature of supply chains, traditionally wired sensor technologies can barely address agricultural product monitoring needs. With the rapid development of the Internet of things (IOT) industry, radio frequency identification (RFID) has been applied extensively around the world, and some developed countries have achieved favorable results by using RFID to manage agricultural supply chain safety, in turn attracting interest from academics. Most studies on agricultural products based on RFID technologies have focused on their applications, while the introduction of new technologies typically requires rigorous and scientific analysis to satisfy industry development requirements. Factors influencing RFID adoption have not yet been studied. By studying these issues, China can begin to promote agricultural information management systems.
Many scholars have studied the applications of RFID for agricultural product management by exploring applications of RFID for agricultural products (Sahin et al. 2002; Regattieri et al. 2007; Amador et al. 2009; Abad et al. 2009), the construction of agricultural product information systems (Gras 2006; Bernardi et al. 2007; Liu and Tang 2010), and the quality management of agricultural products based on RFID (Bernardi et al. 2007; Xie et al. 2007; Jedermanna et al. 2009). While it is worthwhile to study applications of RFID in the agricultural product distribution industry, few studies have examined factors that influence RFID adoption in agricultural product supply chains. In practice, RFID technologies have been implemented widely in some developed countries through governmental and business projects (e.g., Wal-Mart and DHL). Although the IOT industry is growing in China, related successful projects have been rare, with most still occupying the experimental stage. China has lagged behind other developed counties in terms of technological, standard, supply chain and application development. Most related studies have attributed this to lower labor costs in China, to the higher costs of RFID adoption and to undeveloped standards and regulations (Zhang 2011). The introduction of RFID into the agricultural product distribution industry thus serves as an important premise for analyzing factors influencing RFID adoption.
Information technology adoption theory constitutes an emerging facet of information systems research. It examines the behavioral characteristics of organizations and individuals as they adopt and accept information technologies based on principles of social psychology and behavioral science to determine ways in which users accept and continue to use information technologies (Li 2006). The theory plays an important role in studying the introduction of RFID technologies into the management of agricultural products. Fichman (1992) summarized numerous factors influencing information technology adoption and classified information technology adoption theories into two categories: theories focused on individual-level adoption behaviors and those focused on organizational-level adoption behaviors. There are relatively few organization-level information technology adoption behavior theories (Li 2011). Some classic theories include Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), the six-stage model, and the TOE analysis framework. Tornatzky and Fleischer (1990) criticized IDT and maintained that classical innovation diffusion theory is critical of the notion that factors affecting information technology adoption include not only technology elements (T) but also characteristic elements of organizations (O) and environmental elements (E). After the technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework was first proposed, many scholars began to study TOE theory and related influencing factors due to its applicability. TOE theory considers technological issues in terms of technical compatibilities, complexities, observability levels, etc. as well as organizational factors such as the size of an organization, high-level support received, organizational cultures, etc. and environmental factors such as external competitive pressures and government policy support. Chau and Tam (1997) used the TOE framework to analyze factors that affect open-system adoption. Kuan and Chau (2001) proposed a perception-based small business EDI adoption model tested against data collected from 575 small firms in Hong Kong based on the TOE theoretical framework. Grandon and Pearson (2004) examined determinant factors of strategic value and electronic commerce adoption as perceived by upper managers in small- and medium-sized enterprises in the Midwest region of the US. Zhang and Kang (2008) analyzed influencing factors and countermeasures of logistics information network technologies. Li (2011) designed a process model for analyzing factors shaping RFID adoption in the automobile manufacturing industry and applied it through a case study on China’s automobile manufacturing industry.
Therefore, RFID technology application in the agricultural product distribution industry is bound to be affected by various factors. Identifying these factors will play a key role in RFID technology adoption. Processes and node enterprises in agricultural product supply chains constitute an organizational system. It is necessary to analyze factors influencing RFID adoption through an examination of entire organizations. We thus use organizational level adoption behavior theory to conduct this study. TOE theory takes into account technical, organizational and environmental factors, thus forming a more comprehensive framework.
Our paper and contributions
Research on factors influencing RFID adoption in organizations is still relatively new, and with respect to research focused on China, only Li (2011) designed a model for analyzing factors influencing RFID adoption in China’s automobile manufacturing industry.
For research methods, researchers initially used qualitative analysis methods such as literature reviews, case studies, and interviews with experts. More recently, researchers have conducted quantitative analyses such as questionnaires and statistical analyses.
In terms of research models, most related literature has employed Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory (Rogers 1983). Other researchers prefer the TOE framework proposed by Tornatzky and Fleischer (1990).
The frequency of references to factors influencing RFID adoption in the related literature
Upper management support
Trust between enterprises
Chinese government support
In sum, we conduct an exploratory investigation of factors that influence RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry. Using the TOE theoretical framework, we analyze factors that influencing RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry based on the following three contexts: technological, organizational, and environmental contexts. We conduct an empirical analysis of the TOE framework by applying structural equation modeling (SEM) based on actual data drawn from a questionnaire survey on the agricultural product distribution industry in China.
The more complex a form of technology is, the less possible it is for it to be successfully applied. When a form of technology is very difficult for an organization to apply, upper management teams determine to either abandon it or to introduce it later. Thus, we initially hypothesized that RFID complexity negatively affects adoption. Therefore, we propose the following:
We define technological compatibility here as the degree to which RFID corresponds with an organization’s business processes, IT infrastructure, distribution channels, corporate culture, and value system. Generally, it is easier for an organization to employ a form of information technology when it offers a higher degree of technological compatibility. Hence, the following hypothesis is proposed:
The presence of perceived effectiveness enables a higher degree of supply chain visualization, saves time costs, reduces human resource costs, improves business efficiency levels, etc. Therefore, we propose that:
Tornatzky and Klein (1982) showed that costs inhibit the adoption of new technologies. In this paper, costs range from hardware facility costs (including RFID/EPC tags, readers, sensors, middleware and servers) to costs of system implementation, integration, operation, and maintenance. Hence, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Costs have a negative effect on RFID adoption.
Upper management support
Trust between enterprises
Technical knowledge refers to professional IT knowledge owned by enterprises themselves. When they have grasped relevant knowledge and skills pertaining to a new form of technology, companies can effectively assess factors that influence the adoption of this new technology, including advantages, disadvantages, costs, etc. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
When a new form of technology is adopted, some employees may think that they do not have the necessary qualifications or skills to operate this new form of technology. Meanwhile, as the introduction of new technologies increases operation efficiency levels while decreasing labor force requirements, employees will worry about losing their jobs and will therefore exhibit resistance to the adoption of new technologies. Hence, the following hypothesis is proposed:
Employee resistance has a negative effect on RFID adoption.
Premkumar and Ramamurthy (1995) discovered that due to internal pressures and a desire to gain a competitive advantage, enterprises must adopt new technologies. It is likely that they may also face not only pressures resulting from technological innovations generated by upstream and downstream partners in the supply chain and by competitors but also pressures resulting from new developments in business models and industry standards. Therefore, we propose the following:
Chinese government support
Support from the Chinese government has a positive effect on RFID adoption.
Samples and data collection
Due to the limited amount of time the managerial respondents could offer, a mail survey approach was used to allow respondents to complete the surveys at their convenience. For reliability and operability purposes, we recruited staff members who are aware of supply chains, RFID and information technology observations. Upper-level managers, middle managers, and professional staff from agricultural product distribution enterprises in Foshan and Guangzhou and Wal-Mart’s suppliers of agricultural products in Shenzhen were studied, as they are familiar with the requirements of running of a company and have a general understanding of new technologies such as RFID. Of these, 34 companies qualified and agreed to participate in the mailed survey. A contact person from each company was selected to distribute the questionnaire to relevant staff members. Concerning of the professionalism of our questionnaire, we actively communicated with respondents to ensure the authenticity and reliability of our results, as errors can emerge when respondents do not understand questions fully or when they ascribe too much subjective meaning to each question.
Descriptive statistics on the respondent positions
Descriptive statistics on the respondent organization sizes
Measurement of technological contexts
Statement of measurement
T11: RFID system operation is complex
T12: RFID system operation is inconvenient
T13: RFID system operation requires ample experience
T21: RFID technologies are compatible with business processes
T22: RFID technologies are compatible to other information systems (e.g., ERP, MIS and WMS)
T23: RFID technologies complement knowledge held by agricultural product distribution enterprise employees
T31: RFID technologies make agricultural product supply chains more transparent and improve visualization capacities
T32: RFID technologies reduce labor costs
T33: RFID technologies increase the operational efficiency of agricultural product supply chains and cut time costs
T41: Adopting RFID technologies will increase hardware facility costs
T42: Adopting RFID technologies will increase operations and maintenance costs
Organizational context measurement
Statement of measurement
Upper management support
O21: Upper managers actively respond and pay attention when a project is initiated
O22: Upper managers support labor resources, finances and materials
O23: Upper managers are willing to accept risks when adopting RFID
O22: Upper managers inspire employees to apply RFID technologies in the daily work practices
Trust between enterprises
O31: Enterprises in the agricultural product supply chain have access to a strong mechanism for the distribution of benefits
Yang and Jarvenpaa (2005)
O31: Enterprises in the agricultural product supply chain maintain strong risk sharing mechanisms
O33: Enterprises in the agricultural product supply chain cooperate with one another and promote the adoption of this new form of technology
O41: Enterprises in the agricultural product supply chain have relevant technical knowledge on RFID
O42: Enterprises in the supply chain have professional staff trained in RFID use
O51: Employees resist RFID adoption because they do not trust their own abilities
Bhattacharya et al. (2009)
O52: Employees worry about losing their jobs as a result of RFID adoption
O53: Employees have become accustomed to bar code scanning
Environmental context measurement
Statement of measurement
E11: Competitive pressures force enterprises adopt RFID technologies
Sharma et al. (2008)
E12: Social features such as cultures and customs affect RFID adoption
E13: Partners call for RFID adoption
E21: The diversity of consumer demands
E22: Consumer demands change frequently
E23: Fast-paced technological development
E24: Competitors adopt advanced technologies
Chinese government support
E31: RFID development receives financial support from the Chinese government
E32: Relevant policies introduced by the Chinese government boost RFID development
See Table 4.
See Table 5.
See Table 6.
The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used to test the research model presented in Fig. 1. The two-step approach presented by Anderson and Gerbing (1988) was used. First, the measurement model was estimated through a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the reliability and validity of the measurement model. The structural model was then analyzed to examine the overall model fit.
The measurement model
Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient of latent variables
Number of items
Upper management support
Trust between enterprises
Chinese government support
Willing to adopt
Fit indexes of the measurement model
Lower values are better
Comparative Fit Index (CFI)
Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI)
Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI)
Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)
<0.1, adequate goodness of fit;
<0.05, strong goodness of fit
The structural model
Standard estimates of the path coefficient and the significance level
Path: from → to
Standard estimate of path coefficient
Technological complexity → Adoption
Technological compatibility → Adoption
Perceived effectiveness → Adoption
Cost → Adoption
Organization size → Adoption
Upper management support → Adoption
Trust between enterprises → Adoption
Technical knowledge → Adoption
Employees resistance → Adoption
Competitive pressure → Adoption
Uncertainty → Adoption
Government support → Adoption
Based on the TOE framework, we studied factors influencing RFID adoption and used the SEM model and AMOS 17.0 software to carry out an empirical analysis of the agricultural product distribution industry in China. We found that the model accurately reflects RFID adoption in the agricultural product supply chain.
Through our literature review and field research and based on the TOE theoretical framework, we analyzed factors that influence RFID adoption in the Chinese agricultural product distribution industry based on three contexts: the technological, organizational, and environmental contexts. According to the results of our empirical analysis, technological contexts involving technological complexities, technological compatibility, perceived effectiveness, and costs; organizational contexts involving organization sizes, upper management support, trust between enterprises, and technical knowledge; and environmental contexts involving competitive pressures and support from the Chinese government have significant effects on RFID adoption in the Chinese agricultural product distribution industry. Our research findings will help enterprises in the agricultural products supply chain develop a stronger understanding of factors that shape RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry. By making enterprises more aware of how much various factors affect RFID adoption, our findings can help enterprises make more appropriate and rational decisions, thus facilitating RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry.
The following limitations were encountered in this study. The purpose of this study was to develop a stronger understanding of factors that shape RFID adoption in the Chinese agricultural product distribution industry. A small sample was used to gather quantitative and qualitative data. Due to difficulties associated with collecting extensive data, we only studied a small number of samples, meaning that the results of this study require further validation. In future studies, the scope of study samples should be expanded to obtain as much data as possible, making consequent findings more accurate. In addition, numerous other factors functioning outside of and within technological, organizational, and environmental contexts that shape adoption outcomes were not considered in this study.
Although our intention was to develop a balanced perspective of RFID by obtaining views from an equal number of business and IT managers, for many of the organizations studied, the researcher conducting the interviews was directed to IT personnel. Thus, this balance was not achieved. At the time of the study, RFID was still only initially being considered in of many of the Chinese agricultural product distribution enterprises examined. Many business executives therefore still viewed it as a technology-related issue rather than a business imperative.
Our empirical study was carried out in China, and thus the results may not be directly applicable to other countries due to cultural differences. Consequently, related studies should be conducted in different countries. Future studies could use the framework presented here to assess and compare RFID adoption patterns in several countries. In turn, the effects of national environments on RFID adoption can be identified.
All the authors contributed to the manuscript equally. All the authors read and approved of the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the Guangdong Soft Science Research Project (2015A070704005), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2016A030313485), the Guangdong “12th Five-Year” Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project (GD15CGL15), Guangdong University of Technology’s “One-Hundred Young Talents” Startup R&D Fund, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015XZD14, 2015KXKYJ02).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Abad E, Palacio F, Nuin M et al (2009) RFID smart tag for traceability and cold chain monitoring of foods: demonstration in anintercontinental fresh fish logistic chain. J Food Eng 93(4):394–399View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amador C, Emond J-P, Nunes C (2009) Application of RFID technologies in the temperature mapping of the pineapple supply chain. Sens Instrum Food Qual Saf 3(1):26–33View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernardi P, Demartini C, Gandino F (2007) Agri-food traceability management using a RFID system with privacy protection. Adv Inf Netw Appl 5:68–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya M, Chu CH, Mullen T (2009) RFID implementation in retail industry: current status, issues, and challenges. In: Decision Science Institute (DSI) conference 2007, Phoenix, AZ, pp 201–203Google Scholar
- Brown A, Bakhru A (2007) Information systems innovation research and the case of RFID. Int Fed Inf Process 235:363–376Google Scholar
- Brown I, Russel J (2007) Radio frequency identification technology: an exploratory study on adoption in the South African retail sector. Int J Inf Manag 27(4):250–265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chau PYK, Tam KY (1997) Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Q 21(1):1–24View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fichman RG (1992) Information technology diffusion: a review of empirical research. In: Thirteenth international conference on information systems, Dallas, TX, pp 195–206Google Scholar
- Geng XF (2005) Application of RFID technique in the supply management. Logist Sci-Tech 7:79–81Google Scholar
- Grandon EE, Pearson JM (2004) Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Inf Manag 42(1):197–216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gras D (2006) RFID based monitoring of the cold chain. In: 2nd International workshop cold chain managementGoogle Scholar
- Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
- Jedermanna R, Ruiz-Garciab L, Lang W (2009) Spatial temperature profiling by semi-passive RFID loggers for perishable food transportation. Comput Electron Agric 65(2):145–154View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koh CE, Kim HJ, Kim EY (2011) The impact of RFID in retail industry: issues and critical success factors. J Shopp Center Res 13(1):101–118Google Scholar
- Kuan KK, Chau PY (2001) A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Inf Manag 38(8):507–521View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leimeister JM, Knebel U, Krcmar H (2007) RFID as enabler for the boundless real-time organization: empirical insights from Germany. Int J Netw Virtual Organ 4(1):45–64View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li YW (2006) A factors comparative research on organizational adoption behavior between pre-adoption and post-adoption. PhD thesis, Tongji UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Li WC (2011) Study on process model of RFID adoption and its application issues for automotive manufacturing enterprises. PhD thesis, Chongqing UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Liu D, Tang J (2010) Construction of tracing and monitoring system of dairy products. J Northeast Agric Univ 5:149–153Google Scholar
- Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K (1995) The role of inter-organizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of inter-organizational systems. Decis Sci 26(3):303–336View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Regattieri A, Gamberi M, Manzini R (2007) Traceability of food products: general framework and experimental evidence. J Food Eng 81(2):347–356View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riggins FJ, Slaughter KT (2006) The role of collective mental models in IOS adoption: opening the black box of rationality in RFID deployment. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, HI, pp 183–184Google Scholar
- Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sahin E, Dallery Y, Gershwin S (2002) Performance evaluation of a traceability system: an application to the radio frequency identification technology. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 3 pp 210–218Google Scholar
- Seymour L, Lambert PE, Willuweit L (2010) RFID adoption into the container supply chain: proposing a framework. In: Proceedings of the 6th annual ISOnEworld conference, Las Vegas. IEEE, pp 431–435Google Scholar
- Sharma A, Thomas D, Konsynski B (2008) Strategic and institutional perspectives in the evaluation, adoption and early integration of radio frequency identification (RFID): an empirical investigation of current and potential adopters. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Hawaii. IEEE, pp 407–407Google Scholar
- Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M (1990) The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
- Tornatzky LG, Klein K (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 29(1):28–45View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie J, Hu Y, Liu C et al (2007) WSNs-and-RFID-based safety monitoring platform for agricultural products. Chin Agric Mech 1:79–80Google Scholar
- Yang G, Jarvenpaa SL (2005) Trust and radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption within an alliance. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system science, pp 1–10Google Scholar
- Zhang DQ (2011) The application and problems of RFID in the construction of agricultural products quality safety system in China. Acad Exch 206(5):130–132Google Scholar
- Zhang DH, Kang SY (2008) Influence factors and countermeasure analysis on technology adoption for logistics information grid. J Inf 12:51–53Google Scholar