Skip to main content

Table 9 Standard estimates of the path coefficient and the significance level

From: Factors affecting RFID adoption in the agricultural product distribution industry: empirical evidence from China

Hypothesis

Path: from → to

Standard estimate of path coefficient

CR

Significance level

Results

H1

Technological complexity → Adoption

−0.345

−6.74

***

Supported

H2

Technological compatibility → Adoption

0.362

7.621

***

Supported

H3

Perceived effectiveness → Adoption

0.413

7.67

***

Supported

H4

Cost → Adoption

−0.496

−10.347

***

Supported

H5

Organization size → Adoption

0.415

9.342

***

Supported

H6

Upper management support → Adoption

0.375

10.171

***

Supported

H7

Trust between enterprises → Adoption

0.317

8.911

***

Supported

H8

Technical knowledge → Adoption

0.354

7.636

***

Supported

H9

Employees resistance → Adoption

−0.027

−0.07

0.036

Not supported

H10

Competitive pressure → Adoption

0.247

5.068

***

Supported

H11

Uncertainty → Adoption

−0.015

−1.462

0.143

Not supported

H12

Government support → Adoption

0.383

13.079

***

Supported

  1. *** Significance level: p < 0.01