Open Access

Analysis of ALK gene in 133 patients with breast cancer revealed polysomy of chromosome 2 and no ALK amplification

  • Matthew G. Hanna1,
  • Vesna Najfeld1,
  • Hanna Y. Irie2,
  • Joseph Tripodi1 and
  • Anupma Nayak1Email author
SpringerPlus20154:439

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1235-9

Received: 14 February 2015

Accepted: 11 August 2015

Published: 21 August 2015

Abstract

ALK has emerged as a novel tumorigenic factor in several epithelial human cancers. Crizotinib, an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is currently approved to treat lung cancer patients exhibiting ALK gene rearrangements. Our goal was to determine the incidence of ALK aberrations in relation to different breast cancer types. Tissue micro-arrays were constructed of ER+/PR±/HER2− (n = 37), ER−/PR−/HER2+ (n = 15), ER−/PR−/HER2− (n = 61) and ER+/PR+/HER2+ (n = 20) breast cancers; including 13 inflammatory breast carcinomas. FISH was performed using ALK break-apart and chromosome 2 centromere enumeration probes (CEP2). Neither ALK rearrangements nor amplification were identified in the 133 breast cancer cases evaluated. However, copy number gains (CNG) of ALK were identified in 82 of 133 patients (62 %). The CEP2 analysis revealed polysomy of chromosome 2 in all HCNG and LCNG cases, indicating the CNG of ALK are due to polysomy of chromosome 2, rather than true amplification of ALK. To conclude, we observed CNG of ALK secondary to chromosome 2 polysomy in a significant percentage of breast cancer cases, a phenomenon similar to polysomy 17. This study is one of the largest studies to have investigated ALK aberrations in breast cancer and the only study to include all subtypes.

Keywords

ALK Breast cancer Polysomy Inflammatory FISH TMA

Background

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a gene located on the short arm of chromosome 2 (2p23), encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor capable of activating downstream STAT3, AKT/PI3K and RAS/ERK signaling pathways responsible for cell proliferation, migration and survival (Porter and Vaillancourt 1998; Shaw et al. 2011). Alterations in the ALK gene are known to play role in genesis and biology of many tumors including anaplastic large cell lymphoma, neuroblastoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, renal carcinoma, serous carcinoma of the ovary, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, colon carcinoma and more recently non-small cell lung carcinoma. These alterations embrace various rearrangements/translocations, somatic mutations, copy number gains or amplifications (Hallberg and Palmer 2013; Salido et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2008; Lamant et al. 2000; Miyake et al. 2002; Cessna et al. 2002; Passoni et al. 2009; Dirks et al. 2002; Soda et al. 2007; Li et al. 2013). The discovery of the EML4-ALK fusion gene in a subset of non-small cell lung carcinoma (3–7 %) has steered the development of a therapeutic drug crizotinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits the activity of the ALK fusion proteins, cMET, ROS1, and RON) that is FDA approved for treating lung cancer patients exhibiting ALK gene rearrangements (Zou et al. 2007; Kwak et al. 2010; Sahu et al. 2013).

A few recent studies have investigated the role of ALK aberrations in breast cancer, particularly in the context of inflammatory breast cancer and triple negative breast cancers, however, the results have been conflicting (Fukuyoshi et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2009; Robertson et al. 2013; Krishnamurthy et al. 2013; Grob et al. 2012). Inflammatory breast cancer and triple negative breast cancers have the worst prognosis amongst all the subtypes of breast cancer (Engstrøm et al. 2013; Robertson et al. 2010). Inflammatory breast carcinoma is a rare but aggressive type of locally advanced breast cancer characterized by a clinical diagnosis of rapid onset erythema and/or edema of the breast skin (peau d’orange appearance) secondary to blockade of dermal lymphatics by tumor emboli. Most inflammatory breast cancers are hormone receptor (estrogen and progesterone receptors) negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) positive, and are treated by multidisciplinary approaches involving systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Despite multimodality therapy, overall survival is only 35–40 % at 5-years as compared to 80 % for non-inflammatory breast cancers (Robertson et al. 2010). Triple negative breast cancer is defined by lack of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2). Due to lack of hormone receptors and HER2 overexpression, there is no effective targeted therapy so far for this particular subset of patients. Therefore, identification of aberrations in genes such as ALK will be clinically useful for breast cancers, given the availability of various ALK inhibitors.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and frequency of ALK amplification and rearrangements in different breast cancer subtypes including triple negative and inflammatory breast cancers.

Methods

Case selection

A database search was performed under the approval of our Institutional Review Board for cases meeting clinico-pathologic diagnostic criteria for inflammatory breast carcinoma (between 2001 and 2013), triple negative breast carcinoma (between 2005 and 2013), and other select breast tumor subtypes including ER+, Her2+, and triple+ cancers (between 2012 and 2013). Slides and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks of breast tumors were retrieved from pathology archives. Hematoxylin and eosin slides of tumor tissue from resection specimens were reviewed and biomarker profile was recorded from pathology records. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2010 Guidelines were used to score the estrogen, progesterone and HER2 protein expression.

Tissue microarray

Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed with a Chemicon International ATA-100 using two representative 2-mm cores from invasive breast cancers stratified as follows: estrogen receptor positive [ER+/PR±/HER2−], triple positive [ER+/PR+/HER2+], triple negative [ER−/PR−/HER2−], HER2 only positive [ER−/PR−/HER2+] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Representative tissue microarray. IBC inflammatory breast cancer, HER2 positive [ER−/PR−/HER2+], triple negative [ER−/PR−/HER2−]; triple positive [ER+/PR+/HER2+], ER positive [ER+/PR±/HER2−]

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for ALK gene rearrangement

FISH studies were performed using ALK break apart probe [3′-spectrum orange, 5′-spectrum green] (Empire Genomics, Buffalo, NY, USA) and chromosome 2 centromere enumeration probe (CEP2) [spectrum aqua] (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) in all cases. Three micron thick tissue sections were de-paraffinized and pretreated using a Dako (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) de-paraffinization and pretreatment technique followed by hybridization with a probe mixture (ALK and CEP2) of 10 µl at 45 °C on Hybrite (Abbott Molecular). After hybridization, the slides were washed and counterstained with DAPI.

ALK probe validation was carried out on FFPE sections from non-tumor breast tissue and tonsil tissue. A total of 5000 cells were evaluated and scored along with the CEP2 [spectrum aqua]. Ninety-seven percent of non-tumor cells had 2 aqua and 2 ALK fusion signals (yellow), the other 3 % showed variations of normal signal patterns (Fig. 2). The reference range was determined to be <6 % of cells, whereas any abnormal signal pattern in ≥6 % of cells was considered abnormal.
Fig. 2

FISH of normal breast terminal duct lobule showing normal disomy for ALK [3′-spectrum orange, 5′-spectrum green] signals (yellow); a normal pattern in non-tumor breast cells. Inset CEP2 probe [spectrum aqua] performed on metaphase and control cells with normal 2 signal pattern

FISH analysis

At least 100 tumor cells per case were evaluated in 133 patients with breast cancer. Low copy number gain (LCNG) was defined as 3–6 ALK signals, and high copy number gain (HCNG) with >6 ALK signals in ≥6 % of tumor cells. Amplification was defined as >6 copies of ALK signals with no more than 2 centromere enumeration probe 2 (CEP2) aqua signals in >15 % of cells. Positive rearrangement was defined if 1 set of orange and green signals were >2 signals apart in >15 % of tumor cells, or when a single orange signal with a separate fusion (shown as one yellow signal) was seen in >15 % tumor cells. Two different observers performed evaluations to reduce inter-observer variability.

ALK immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemistry for ALK protein was performed only in IBC cases, using standard laboratory protocols in Dako Autostainer Link 48. The de-paraffinized tissue microarray of the IBC cases (n = 13) was pretreated with heat-induced epitope retrieval: the slide was pre-heated to a temperature of 65 °C; the epitope retrieval temperature was 97 °C for 20 min followed by cooling down to 65 °C. The slide was then washed into diluted EnVision FLEX Wash Buffer at 22 °C for 3 min and then incubated for 20 min with FLEX mouse monoclonal anti-human CD246 ALK antibody (clone ALK1, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and FLEX+, mouse, Linker. Positive and negative controls were performed simultaneously. Positive staining was defined as brown cytoplasmic positivity in the tumor cells.

Results

The distribution of our 133 study cases is as follows: ER+/PR±/HER2− (n = 37), ER−/PR−/HER2+ (n = 15), ER−/PR−/HER2− (n = 61), ER+/PR+/HER2+ (n = 20). Of these 133 cases, 13 had a clinico-pathologic diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer and include 3 ER−/PR−/HER2− (24 %), 5 ER−/PR−/HER2+ (38 %), and 5 ER+/PR±/HER2− (38 %) cases.

None of the 133 cases showed ALK rearrangement or amplification. However, copy number gains of ALK were identified in 82 of 133 patients (62 %). Of these 82 cases, four (5 %) demonstrated HCNGs of ALK (range 6–13 % of tumor cells) and include 1 ER−/PR−/HER2−, 2 ER+/PR−/HER2− and 1 HER2 only positive (ER−/PR−/HER2+) case. The remaining 78 cases (95 %) demonstrated low copy number gains and include 12 (80 %) ER−/PR−/HER2+ (range 10–68 % of tumor cells), 39 (64 %) ER−/PR−/HER2− (range 6–68 % of tumor cells), 21 (57 %) ER+/PR±/HER2− (range 6–69 % of tumor cells), and 6 (30 %) ER+/PR+/HER2+ cases (range 6–91 % of tumor cells) (Table 1).
Table 1

Signal pattern [n (cell range %)] of ALK

 

Split pattern (1O1G1F)

Single orange (1O1F)

LCNG

HCNG

ER−/PR−/HER2− (n = 61)

1 (2 %)

12 (1–3 %)

39 (6–68 %)

1 (13 %)

ER−/PR−/HER2+ (n = 15)

0 (0 %)

3 (1–3 %)

12 (10–68 %)

1 (8 %)

ER+/PR±/HER2− (n = 37)

3 (2–3 %)

7 (1–12 %)

21 (6–69 %)

2 (6–11 %)

ER+/PR+/HER2+ (n = 20)

0 (0 %)

1 (1 %)

6 (6–91 %)

0 (0 %)

Inflammatory breast carcinoma (n = 13)

3 (2–3 %)

3 (5–12 %)

10 (9–69 %)

3 (6–13 %)

1O one orange signal (3′), 1G one green signal (5′), 1F one fusion signal (yellow), LCNG low copy number gains, HCNG high copy number gains

Since the previous studies on ALK are primarily focused on inflammatory breast carcinoma, we analyzed the results of our 13 inflammatory breast carcinoma cases separately. All 13 cases showed low or HCNGs of ALK without any rearrangement or amplification. Interestingly 3 of the 4 cases in HCNG cohort were inflammatory breast carcinomas (1 ER−/PR−/HER2− and 2 ER+/PR−/HER2−; range 6–13 % of tumor cells). The remaining ten cases demonstrated low copy number gains (range 9–69 % of tumor cells).

The CEP2 analysis in HCNG cases revealed polysomy of chromosome 2 in all 4 (100 %) cases with 3–16 CEP2 signals noted in 51–64 % of tumor cells (Fig. 3). The CEP2 analysis in the remaining cases with low copy number gains also showed chromosome 2 polysomy (3–8 signals/cell, range 6–87 % of tumor cells) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

High copy number gain and chromosome 2 polysomy. A case of inflammatory breast cancer revealing >6 signals/cell of ALK break-apart probes (HCNG) in representative tumor cells (closed-head arrows). Note, the same tumor cells show >2 CEP2 (aqua) signals, indicating polysomy for chromosome 2

Fig. 4

Low copy number gain. A case of HER2+ breast cancer is shown revealing 3–6 ALK signals of ALK break-apart probes in representative tumor cells (open-head arrows). Normal signal pattern are seen in cells (arrowheads), as 2 ALK (yellow) signals with 2 CEP2 (aqua) signals

Immunohistochemical staining for ALK protein expression was only performed in the IBC cases (n = 13) and none of the cases expressed ALK protein.

Discussion

Our study demonstrated that ALK gene was neither rearranged nor amplified in any of the 133-breast cancer cases evaluated by FISH. However, a significant percentage of cases (82/133; 62 %) revealed low copy number gains of ALK irrespective of the subtype. HCNGs of ALK were limited to a subset of inflammatory breast cancer (3, 23 %), and a single ER−/PR−/HER2+ (1, 7 %) case. All other tumor subtypes showed only low copy number gains. The two subtypes with the most copy number alterations were the inflammatory breast cancer (100 %) and ER−/PR−/HER2+ cases (87 %). FISH testing for CEP2 probe demonstrated that increased copy number gains of ALK are due to polysomy of chromosome 2 rather than true amplification of ALK gene.

There are very few studies exploring ALK gene aberrations in breast cancer, and the results yielded have been conflicting. In 2008, Fukuyoshi et al. used EML4-ALK transcripts to detect the incidence of EML4-ALK rearrangements in lung, colon, and breast cancer. Their study did not detect any EML4-ALK rearrangements in 90 breast cancer cases included in the study (Fukuyoshi et al. 2008). Conversely Lin et al. (2009) identified EML4-ALK rearrangements in 5 of 209 (2.4 %) breast cancers (subtype unspecified) using RT-PCR exon array genomic sequencing and confirmatory FISH testing. Robertson et al. exclusively studied inflammatory breast cancers using Reverse Phase Protein Microarray analysis, a pathway activation mapping technique, and reported activation of multiple members of the receptor tyrosine kinase ALK signaling network (JAK1/STAT3, AKT, mTOR, PDK-1 and AMP kinase β) in inflammatory breast cancer cell lines, at levels similar to those in ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancers. Authors extended their study to clinical tumor samples of inflammatory breast cancer and detected ALK copy number gains and gene amplification in 20/25 (80 %) patient tumor samples. They also identified one case with an EML4-ALK translocation. Furthermore, these investigators successfully demonstrated that even the submicromolar concentrations of crizotinib induced significant tumor shrinkage in the pre-clinical xenograft models of inflammatory breast cancer. Currently a phase I clinical trial is enrolling patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma for treatment with crizotinib (Robertson et al. 2013). In contrast, Krishnamurthy et al. (2013) did not detect EML4-ALK gene rearrangement or ALK protein expression in the inflammatory breast cancer cases. There is only one study published to date addressing triple negative breast cancers and did not report EML4-ALK rearrangement in 65 cases tested using FISH (Grob et al. 2012). Although the results of aforementioned studies are inconsistent, they collectively suggest lower incidence of EML4-ALK rearrangements in breast cancer as compared to non-small cell lung cancer.

Our study is one of the largest clinical studies to have investigated ALK gene rearrangements and amplification in breast cancer and the only study to include all subtypes. This study highlights that copy number gain of ALK gene is the result of polysomy of chromosome 2 and reflects a common phenomenon in all breast cancer subtypes, specifically in inflammatory and ER−/PR−/HER2+ breast cancers.

The functional significance of ALK copy number gains or polysomy2 in breast carcinogenesis is not clear. Recent study by Kim et al. demonstrated that ALK CNG was observed in 17/36 (47.2 %) IBC cases and was associated with worse overall survival when compared to the patients without ALK CNG by univariate analysis (24.9 vs 38.1 months; p = 0.033). The recurrence free survival after mastectomy was also shorter in the patients with ALK CNG (12.7 vs 43.4 months; p = 0.016) (Kim et al. 2015). Studies of ALK in solid tumors other than breast have shown similar correlation with worse prognosis. Jia et al. (2014) reported that increased ALK copy number gains in hepatocellular carcinoma are associated with a decreased 3-year overall survival (18.2 vs 63.6 %; p = 0.021) and 3-year progression free survival (18.2 vs 46.9 %; p = 0.019) as compared to those without ALK copy number alterations. In lung cancer, copy number gain of ALK is a more frequent phenomenon than ALK rearrangement, and is reported in up to 63 % of cases (Salido et al. 2011). This has persuaded investigators to study if tyrosine kinase inhibitors would be effective even in patients with ALK copy number gains without rearrangement; however, the results have been conflicting. A recent study tested crizotinib sensitivity in nine lung cancer cell lines and three patients with NSCLC exhibiting ALK CNG, and concluded that HCNG without ALK rearrangement has predictive value for chemo sensitivity to crizotinib (Kalai et al. 2012). On the contrary; CNG of ALK has been implicated as one of the mechanisms for developing resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Pietrantonio et al. (2014) have reported that gain of ALK gene copy number may predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and RAS-RAF-PI3KCA wild-type status. It would be of interest to study whether ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors would be effective in breast cancers with ALK copy number gains.

In our study, none of the 13 inflammatory breast cancer cases (including 3 cases with high CNG) exhibited ALK protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. This is in contrast to the study by Kim et al. (2015) where ALK protein expression was demonstrated in 15/27 inflammatory breast cancer cases. However, no significant correlation was observed between CNG and ALK protein expression. Nine of 14 IBC cases without CNG revealed ALK protein expression compared to 6 of 13 cases with CNG (p = 0.767).

Conclusion

Neither ALK gene rearrangements nor amplification were identified in the 133 breast cancer cases evaluated in our study. We observed extra copy numbers of ALK as a result of chromosome 2 polysomy in 62 % of breast cancer cases. This suggests polysomy of chromosome 2 is common in breast cancer regardless of the subtype, a phenomenon analogous to polysomy 17. The clinical and functional significance of chromosome 2 polysomy and extra copy numbers of ALK in breast cancer is yet to be elucidated. Larger studies with survival data are needed in the context of breast cancer to draw such conclusion.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MGH: study design, case selection, medical chart review, created tissue microarrays, FISH testing and analysis, results analysis, manuscript writing. VN: FISH testing and analysis, validation, results analysis, manuscript editing. HYI: study concept, study design, clinical data, manuscript editing. JT: FISH testing and analysis. AN: study concept, study design, case selection, results analysis, manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
(2)
Department of Oncological Sciences, The Mount Sinai Hospital and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

References

  1. Cessna MH, Holly Zhou, Sanger W et al (2002) Expression of ALK1 and p80 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and its mesenchymal mimics: a study of 135 cases. Mod Pathol 15:931–938View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Y, Takita J, Choi YL et al (2008) Oncogenic mutations of ALK kinase in neuroblastoma. Nature 455:971–974View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dirks WG, Fahnrich S, Lis Y et al (2002) Expression and functional analysis of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in tumor cell lines. Int J Cancer 100:49–56View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Engstrøm MJ, Opdahl S, Hagen AI et al (2013) Molecular subtypes, histopathological grade and survival in a historic cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140:463–473View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukuyoshi Y, Inoue H, Kita Y et al (2008) EML4-ALK fusion transcript is not found in gastrointestinal and breast cancers. Br J Cancer 98:1536–1539View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Grob TJ, Heilenkotter U, Geist S et al (2012) Rare oncogenic mutations of predictive markers for targeted therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:561–567View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hallberg B, Palmer RH (2013) Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology. Nat Rev Cancer 13:685–700View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jia SW, Fu S, Wang F et al (2014) ALK gene copy number gain and its clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 20:183–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalai K, Planchard D, Auger N et al (2012) ALK amplification and crizotinib sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines and patients report. 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abstract Number: 10556Google Scholar
  10. Kim MH, Lee S, Koo JS et al (2015) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene copy number gain in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): prevalence, clinicopathologic features and prognostic implication. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0120320View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Krishnamurthy S, Woodward W, Yang W et al (2013) Status of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in inflammatory breast carcinoma. Springerplus 2:409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kwak EL, Bang Y-J, Camidge DR et al (2010) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:1693–1703View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lamant L, Pulford K, Bischof D et al (2000) Expression of the ALK tyrosine kinase gene in neuroblastoma. Am J Pathol 156:1711–1721View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Y, Li Y, Yang T et al (2013) Clinical significance of EML4-ALK fusion gene and association with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations in 208 Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 8:e52093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin E, Li L, Guan Y et al (2009) Exon array profiling detects EML4-ALK fusion in breast, colorectal, and non-small cell lung cancers. Mol Cancer Res 7:1466–1476View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Miyake I, Hakomori Y, Shinohara A et al (2002) Activation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase is responsible for hyperphosphorylation of ShcC in neuroblastoma cell lines. Oncogene 21:5823–5834View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Passoni L, Longo L, Collini P et al (2009) Mutation-independent anaplastic lymphoma kinase overexpression in poor prognosis neuroblastoma patients. Cancer Res 69:7338–7346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pietrantonio F, Maggi C, Di Bartolomeo M et al (2014) Gain of ALK gene copy number may predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and RAS-RAF-PI3KCA wild-type status. PLoS ONE 9:e92147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter AC, Vaillancourt RR (1998) Tyrosine kinase receptor-activated signal transduction pathways which lead to oncogenesis. Oncogene 17:1343–1352View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Robertson F, Bondy M, Yang W et al (2010) Inflammatory breast cancer the disease, the biology, the treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 60:351–375View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Robertson FM, Petricoin E, Van Laere SJ et al (2013) Presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in inflammatory breast cancer. Springerplus 2:497View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sahu A, Prabhash K, Noronha V et al (2013) Crizotinib: a comprehensive review. South Asian J Cancer 2(2):91–97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Salido M, Pijuan L, Martinez-Aviles L et al (2011) Increased ALK gene copy number and amplification are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac 6:21–27View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw AT, Beow YY, Solomon BJ et al (2011) Targeting anaplastic lymphoma kinase in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17:2081–2086View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M et al (2007) Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature 448:561–566View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zou HY, Li Q, Lee JH, Arango ME et al (2007) An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, exhibits cytoreductive antitumor efficacy through antiproliferative and antiangiogenic mechanisms. Cancer Res 67:4408–4417View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hanna et al. 2015