Skip to content

Advertisement

SpringerPlus
SpringerPlus Cover Image
  • Research
  • Open Access

Efficacy of indirect ELISA for serodiagnosis of melioidosis using immunodominant antigens from non-pathogenic Burkholderia thailandensis

SpringerPlus20165:1814

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3505-6

©  The Author(s) 2016

  • Received: 23 June 2015
  • Accepted: 10 October 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Melioidosis caused by gram negative bacteria, B. pseudomallei, is a fatal disease in the tropical and sub-tropical regions. However, sporadic cases have been reported in elsewhere. Early detection is imperative to reduce the mortality rate. Serological tests have being substantially developed using recombinant proteins as specific targeted antigens to melioidosis antibodies. In the present study, we focus on a truncated flagellin fragment (FLAG300) and outer membrane protein A (OmpABT) of B. thailandensis E264 as potential antigens for developing indirect ELISA to improve the serodiagnosis of melioidosis. Recombinant proteins were overexpressed and purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography with denaturing conditions. The sensitivity and specificity of individual test were calculated within culture-confirmed melioidosis sera (n = 42) and non-melioidosis serum samples (n = 241) using the cut-off point at average of absorbance plus 2 standard deviations. The results demonstrated that a FLAG 300 based indirect ELISA showed 90.48 % sensitivity and 87.14 % specificity and an OmpABT based this assay revealed sensitivity of 80.95 % and specificity of 89.21 %. Their use in a double-antigen ELISA resulted in improve specificity (92.95 %) and still high degree of sensitivity (85.71 %). These data suggest a facile method for serodiagnosis of melioidosis by the use of antigens from a non-pathogenic strain.

Keywords

  • Melioidosis
  • Flagellin
  • Outer membrane protein A
  • B. thailandensis

Background

Burkholderia pseudomallei infection, melioidosis, is an infectious disease that is mainly described in the major endemic areas of SE Asia and Northern Australia. However, there have been reported cases outside these endemic regions such as in Brasil, India and United States of America (Corral et al. 2008; Deshmukh and Mundhada 2013; Kunnathuparambil et al. 2013; Miralles et al. 2004). It is a major public health problem in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia (Dance 1991; Leelarasamee and Bovornkitti 1989), because the mortality rate is still high even with treatment, and no effective vaccine is available so far. The clinical manifestations of this disease are diverse, ranging from chronic localized infection in many organs to acute septicemia, complicating the clinical diagnosis of melioidosis. In septicemic cases, expiration will occur in a few days; thus reliable and early diagnosis is imperative. Although bacterial isolation and identification is the definitive diagnostic method, it is a time consuming strategy (5–7 days) (Cheng 2010). Moreover, bacterial culture is an imperfect reference method because it has low sensitivity and negative predictive value (Limmathurotsakul et al. 2010). Serological diagnosis of melioidosis is widely used in endemic regions, especially the indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA); however, it has limited utility for diagnosis because of relatively poor sensitivity (Appassakij et al. 1990; Harris et al. 2009; Sorenson et al. 2013) and a high seropositivity background in endemic areas (Ashdown and Guard 1984; Kanaphun et al. 1993). Although it is of limited value for diagnosis in those areas, it may be of assistance in some circumstances, particularly when paired sera are available or high serum titers are reported with the presence of clinical signs. Currently, a number of serodiagnostic tests for melioidosis detection has been developed using crude extracts (Sorenson et al. 2013; Cooper et al. 2013; Parthasarathy et al. 2006) or purified recombinant proteins from B. pseudomallei (Allwood et al. 2008; Arora et al. 2015; Chantratita et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2003; Druar et al. 2008) as antigens. Even though they obviously demonstrate substantial improvement over the clinical standard IHA test, all antigens are derived from a Tier 1 agent, B. pseudomallei, and thus manipulations must be done under biosafety level 3 (BSL-3). Conversely, such experiments with a close relative of this bacterium, B. thailandensis, can dispense with this biosafety level (Rotz et al. 2002). Both of the organisms are broadly similar genetically and immunologically (Yu et al. 2006). Previous studies indicate that melioidosis protective antibodies can be raised using antigens from B. thailandensis (Ngugi et al. 2010; Scott et al. 2013) and certain antigens of B. pseudomallei share epitopes with this closely related species (Wajanarogana et al. 2013). In addition, some biological properties of B. pseudomallei have been explained by using B. thailandensis as a non-pathogenic model (Haraga et al. 2008).

A number of serodiagnostic antigens of B. pseudomallei have been revealed using protein microarray (Felgner et al. 2009) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (Allwood et al. 2008; Arora et al. 2015; Wajanarogana et al. 2013; Hara et al. 2013). The majority of such antigens are cell surface-associated proteins such as outer membrane proteins (Omps), and secreted molecules. In this study, we focused on Omps, especially outer membrane protein A (OmpA) and truncated flagellin fragment (FLAG300) of B. thailandensis E264. The FLAG300 indicates as the potential antigen for diagnosis of melioidosis (Wajanarogana et al. 2013); however, culture-confirmed melioidosis serum samples have not yet been studied. As well as a flagellin fragment, OmpA of B. pseudomallei has immunogenic properties which has been used for serodiagnosis of melioidosis (Allwood et al. 2008; Arora et al. 2015; Hara et al. 2013). Moreover, both of these antigens have been suggested as potential candidate vaccines (Brett and Woods 1996; Hara et al. 2009; Ye and Gan 2007). Our preliminary study has found that ompA sequences of B. pseudomallei and closely related species show high homologues. Here, we isolate ompA from B. thailandensis E264 and express and purify it as recombinant protein for developing serodiagnosis of melioidosis, together with FLAG300.

Methods

Bacterial strains, cloning vector and culture condition

The OmpA gene and the truncated of flagellin gene of B. thailandensis E264 were inserted into expression vector, pET-24a(+) (Novagen). E. coli BL21(DE3) and XL1-Blue harboring recombinant expression vectors were basically grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium containing kanamycin (50 µg ml−1) at 37 °C with shaking.

Serum specimens

Sera were used in this study from the following three groups of individuals: (1) Culture confirmed-positive of melioidosis serum samples collected from endemic regions, Amnat Charoen hospital and Khon Khaen hospital, Thailand (n = 42). (2) Serum samples from septicemic patients caused by other infectious bacteria (i.e. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gram positive bacteria and gram negative non-fermenter bacteria) (n = 74) collected from Thammasat hospital, Thailand. This group was used as the disease control. (3) Normal sera collected from healthy blood donor served as the negative control group (n = 167). The last group was obtained from Thammasat hospital (n = 49) and Amnat Charoen hospital (n = 118), Thailand. All sera in this study are leftover specimens of routine laboratory without direct contact with the patients and personal data record. Collection of serum samples was approved by the Rangsit University Ethics Committee (No. RSEC 17/35).

OmpA gene isolation and cloning

The nucleotides sequence of ompA (BPSL2522; Sanger Research Institute, http://www.sanger.ac.uk) was used to design oligonucleotide primers to amplify ompA from B. thailandensis E264 with incorporated restriction sites. Forward primer, OmpAF (5′-CGCATATGAATAAACTTTCAAAGCTC-3′) and reverse primer, OmpAR (5′-GAATTCGCCTTCGCCG GAACG-3′), that introduced NdeI and EcoRI endonuclease sites (underlined), respectively, were custom synthesized from Bio Basic Inc., Canada. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out with 100–200 ng of DNA template, 20 pmol of each primer, 1× Pfu buffer with MgSO4, 0.5 µl of 20 mM dNTPs, and 1.25 U of Pfu DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Life Sciences). Prior to DNA amplification, the mixture was heated at 99 °C for 5 min. The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: one cycle of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, 34 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing and extension as the same previous condition, and the final cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was digested with NdeI plus EcoRI (Biolab) and cloned as an NdeI-EcoRI fragment downstream of the T7 promoter in the expression vector, pET24a(+), designated pET24a-OmpABT. The BL21(DE3) strain was transformed with pET24a-OmpABT recombinant plasmids.

DNA sequencing and analysis

The nucleotides sequence of the selected clone was custom carried out in both orientations by Ward Medic Ltd. Part, Thailand. The sequence was analyzed by searching for homology in the entire database by nucleotide type of similarity search (blastn) with the BLAST program (Altschul et al. 1997) at the NCBI server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) and compared with the OmpA sequence (BPSL2522) of B. pseudomallei (www.ebi.ac.th).

Recombinant proteins expression and purification

A successful transformant, E. coli BL21(DE3) containing pET24a-OmpABT, was grown overnight in a 5 ml LB broth containing 50 µg ml−1 kanamycin at 37 °C with shaking. The overnight culture was used to inoculate 200 ml fresh LB broth (50 µg ml−1 kanamycin) at 1:100 dilution and cultured at 37 °C to an OD600nm of 0.6–0.8. Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG; Fermentas, Life Sciences) was added to the final concentration of 1 mM to induce protein expression. The induced culture was allowed to grow for 2 h at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm before the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of lysis buffer (IMAC5 pH 8.0) containing 20 mM Na2HPO4, 1 M NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM imidazole and 15 µl of protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche applied Science) and lysed by sonication. After cell disruption, the resulting preparation was separated into soluble and insoluble or inclusion body fractions by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The inclusion body was solubilized in IMAC5 containing 8 M urea and 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) overnight at room temperature under orbital agitation. Any insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 60 min. The solubilized inclusion body was purified by IMAC under denaturing conditions using TALON® metal affinity resins (Clontech Laboratories Inc.). The equilibrated resins were incubated with the solubilized inclusion body for 3–4 h at room temperature under orbital agitation and then were loaded on a column. The column was continuously washed with 20 column volume (CV) of equilibration solution, 10 CV of IMAC10 (20 mM Na2HPO4, 1 M NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 8 M urea and 10 mM imidazole), 10 CV of IMAC15 (20 mM Na2HPO4, 1 M NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 8 M urea and 15 mM imidazole) and the final step with 10 CV of IMAC20 (20 mM Na2HPO4, 1 M NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 8 M urea and 20 mM imidazole). The bound protein was eluted with 5 CV of 20 mM Na2HPO4, 1 M NaCl, 10 % (v/v) glycerol, 400 mM imidazole, 8 M urea, and 5 mM DTT. The elution fraction was concentrated using Amicon® Ultra centrifugal filter (Millpore Corporation). The protein concentration was determined by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). The truncated flagellin protein (FLAG300) was expressed and purified as describe in the previous report (Wajanarogana et al. 2013).

SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis

The expressed and purified proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE according to the method described by Laemmli (1970) with 12 % polyacrylamide gel. After proteins were separated on the gels by electrophoresis, they were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 or electrophoretically transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Pall Corporation) using Trans-blot®SD semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). The blotted membrane was washed twice with TBS buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) and blocked with blocking buffer (0.25 g blocking reagent in 50 ml of blocking reagent buffer, QIAexpress® detection assay) for 1 h at room temperature. After twice washing with TBST (20 mM Trish HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20 and 0.2 % (v/v) Triton X-100), 1:1000 diluted anti-his HRP conjugate in blocking buffer was added and incubated for 1 h. Prior to protein band detection, the membrane was washed twice with TBST and one time with TBS buffer. Immunoreactive protein band was visualized with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (KPL).

Indirect ELISA and its evaluation

Prior to evaluate the potential of recombinant proteins as antigens for serodiagnosis of melioidosis with indirect ELISA, the optimal concentration of this assay reagents was determined by checkerboard titration method using pooled of five culture confirmed-positive of melioidosis sera and five sera of healthy donors. It was performed in duplicate using Microlon® plates (Greiner bio-one). The 96-well microtiter plates were separately coated with 100 µl of 0.1 µg ml−1 of recombinant OmpABT purified protein antigen and 100 µl of 1 µg ml−1 of purified truncated flagellin fragment in coating buffer (carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) at 4 °C for overnight. The plates were blocked with 150 µl of blocking buffer (0.5 % of bovine serum albumin in coating buffer) at 37 °C for 1 h and they were washed 3 times with PBS-Tween solution [PBS and 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20)]. After washing, 100 µl of diluted serum samples (1:3200) in PBS were added in each well and then the plates were further incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The wells were washed with PBS-Tween solution 3 times and added with 100 µl of diluted (1:1000) anti-human IgG conjugated with HRP (KPL). After 1 h incubation at 37 °C, the wells were washed with PBS-Tween solution 3 times and 100 µl of TMB substrate solutions were added to each well. The reaction was left to develop for 15 min and stopped with 100 µl of 1 N HCl. The reaction products were determined using a microplate reader at OD450nm (Bio-Rad model 550; Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.). On each plate, combinations of positive (pooled positive) and negative controls (direct conjugate control) were carried out in duplicate.

Data analysis

The mean and standard deviation of normal serum samples were calculated and cut-off value was determined as the mean of normal controls plus two standard deviations (SD). Serum samples were considered positive if the mean optical densities were higher than cut-off point. For consideration as positive following the criteria of multiple-antigen ELISA, the serum tested specifically react with any antigen when the cut-off value was calculated from the mean optical densities plus three standard deviations (Zhang et al. 2009). Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 5.0.

Results

OmpA gene cloning and DNA sequencing

The amplified product, 680 bps, was isolated from genomic DNA of B. thailandensis E264 by specific primers designed based on the ompA sequence of B. pseudomallei K96243. The purified amplicon was successively digested with NdeI and EcoRI and cloned into NdeI/EcoRI linearized pET24a(+) to construct the recombinant plasmid (pET24a-OmpABT). After transformation into E. coli BL21(DE3), a clone was selected to sequence and analyze. The nucleotide sequence showed a high degree of identity (98–100 %) to the OmpA family protein of B. thailandensis and B. pseudomallei when examined by blastn (data not shown). A comparison of deduced amino acids sequence with the published OmpA protein of B. pseudomallei (BPSL 2522) revealed that they have about 99 % homology over the entire sequences (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

A comparison of deduced amino acid of OmpABT and the published OmpA protein of B. pseudomallei, BPSL 2522, asterisks represent identity and dots indicate similarity

Analysis of expressed recombinant protein

The selected clone carrying the construct pET24a-OmpABT plasmid was induced with 1 mM IPTG for 2 h at 37 °C. The expressed proteins of about 27 and 35 kDa appeared in the total cellular proteins as demonstrated by SDS-PAGE analysis; however, they mainly resided within inclusion bodies (Fig. 2a). The identity of the expressed protein was confirmed by Western blot analysis using anti-his antibody (Fig. 2b). The lower immune-reactive bands (less than 25 kDa) were observed and a less abundant higher molecular weight band (about 60 kDa) suggests that they present an internal degradation and a dimer of recombinant proteins (Allwood et al. 2008; Hara et al. 2009), respectively. Prior to protein purification under denaturing condition, the inclusion bodies was initially solubilized with 8 M urea and reduced with DTT and then insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The soluble fraction was purified by Talon™ resins directed to the hexa-histidine tag at the carboxyl terminus of the recombinant protein based on immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). Step-wise washing not only helped to get rid of non specific proteins but the targeted proteins were also lost (data not shown). The bound proteins were eluted with elution buffer and concentrated for use in the further step (Fig. 2). Purified recombinant protein was found to be 3.65 mg from 200 ml of culture or 18.25 mg l−1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The expressed and purified OmpABT was confirmed by 12 % SDS-PAGE (a) and western blotting (b). Lanes 1 and 2, total cell lysate of E. coli harboring pET24a-OmpABT of uninduced and induced clone with IPTG, respectively, Lane 3, soluble fraction, Lane 4, inclusion bodies fraction, Lane 5, concentrated eluted protein and Lane M, protein molecular weight marker. Relative molecular mass (kDa) of standard proteins is shown on the left-hand side. The arrowhead indicates the location of targeted protein

Evaluation of constructed OmpABT and FLAG300 proteins as serodiagnostic reagents using indirect ELISA

Both recombinant antigens were used in this assay to detect antigen-specific IgG antibody in three groups of sera: bacterial culture confirmed-melioidosis sera, septicemia with other bacteria serum samples (diseases control) and sera of blood donors from endemic areas (Amnat Charoen and Khon Khaen provinces) and non-endemic region (Pathumthani province). The optimal cut-off point of individual recombinant antigens (mean plus two standard deviations) were calculated from absorbance values of serum samples from healthy donors (n = 167). They were found out to be 0.207037 and 0.207312 for OmpABT and FLAG300, respectively. The average of optical densities (ODs) of endemic and non-endemic serum samples are not significantly different. The OD values observed with of all the 3 sera groups and cut-off values are given in Fig. 3. The OD value of a serum sample greater than the cut-off point was considered as positive. The serodiagnostic indices of indirect ELISA using individual antigens based on defining the culture confirmed-positive sera and healthy donor and disease control sera as true positive and true negative, respectively were calculated (Table 1). The sensitivity of FLAG300 B. thailandensis was higher (90.48 %) than OmpABT (80.95 %) recombinant protein whereas the specificity was very similar (87.14 and 89.21 %) as well as the accuracy (around 88 %). Using a combination of two recombinant proteins to predict the potential for serodiagnosis of melioidosis, based on analysis of the individual reactivities of FLAG300 and OmpABT with the serum samples, was 85.71 % sensitivity and good specificity (92.95 %).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The reactivity of serum samples with OmpABT (a) and FLAG300 antigens (b) in indirect ELISA. Both antigens were screened with culture confirmed-melioidosis sera (1), disease control sera (2) and healthy donor sera (3). Each symbol represents the average of duplicate readings of one serum samples. Cut-off values were showed by solid lines and mean of each group (dash lines)

Table 1

Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of indirect ELISA using OmpABT and FLAG300 antigens

Diagnostic index

Serodiagnostic reagent

OmpABT

FLAG300

OmpABT and FLAG300 combination

Sensitivitya

80.95 (34/42)

90.48 (38/42)

85.71 (36/42)

Specificityb

89.21 (215/241)

87.14 (210/241)

92.95 (224/241)

Accuracyc

87.99 (249/283)

87.63 (248/283)

91.87 (260/283)

a(No. of positives of melioidosis sera/total no. melioidosis sera) × 100

b(No. of negative of non-melioidosis sera/total no. non-melioidosis sera) × 100

c(No. of positives of melioidosis sera and negatives of non-melioidosis sera/no. of all tested sera) × 100

Discussion

The diagnosis of melioidosis can be done within 3 strategies, bacteriological, molecular and serological methods. Even though bacterial culture is the reference method so far, it has many limitations such as it is time consuming, requires good practice and a high level of experience of the investigator, and it is a relatively low sensitivity assay (Limmathurotsakul et al. 2010). Septicemic melioidosis patients might expire before a laboratory report, and thus early detection is imperative. A number of serological tests being developed to improve diagnosis of melioidosis using both recombinant proteins and extracted antigens from B. pseudomallei (Allwood et al. 2008; Anandan et al. 2010; Parthasarathy et al. 2008). In previous reports, the principal immunogenic proteins of B. pseudomallei are located on the cell surface such as OmpA or Omp3, truncated flagellin proteins and type IV pilus protein (PilO) (Allwood et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2003; Essex-Lopresti et al. 2005). However, such reports reveal quite high diagnostic indices, and serious biosafety level containment facilities (BSL-3) are necessitated to develop such assays. Our previous report demonstrated that the flagellin protein fragment of the closely related species, B. thailandensis, can react with antibodies in positive serodiagnostic sera of melioidosis (Wajanarogana et al. 2013). Moreover, non-pathogenic B. thailandensis was used as a potential model to refer certain biological properties of B. pseudomallei because they are highly similar at the genetic level (Yu et al. 2006). The experimental manipulation of non-pathogenic strain can be performed under standard routine microbiological condition (BSL-1). In the present study, we produced recombinant proteins, OmpABT and FLAG300 in order to evaluate their potential as antigens for diagnosis of melioidosis by an indirect ELISA. The recombinant proteins were overexpressed as incorrectly folded insoluble products (Lilie et al. 1998). The expressed OmpABT does not require a refolding process, however, since there is recognition of linear epitopes. The recombinant proteins fused to hexa-histidine tag at the carboxyl termini were single step purified under denaturing conditions with metal affinity resin chromatography. Although stringent washing conditions were carried out, multiple protein bands were detected. However, those bands strongly react with anti-hexa-histidine antibody indicating that they correspond to the fusion protein. The distinct bands with higher and slightly lower molecular weight than targeted recombinant protein might be the results of different isoforms and proteolytic breakdown, respectively (Allwood et al. 2008; Hara et al. 2009).

Several previous studies demonstrate that truncated flagellin fragment and OmpA protein of B. pseudomallei serve as the diagnostic potential of melioidosis (Allwood et al. 2008; Arora et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2003; Hara et al. 2013). In this study, the recombinant proteins, OmpABT and FLAG300, from the closely related species, B. thailandensis, were evaluated as antigens which specifically react to melioidosis antibodies using indirect ELISA and we calculated the serodiagnostic indices. The evaluations were performed with 42 culture confirmed-melioidosis sera, 74 other diseases control sera and 167 healthy donor sera. It is not surprising that the average absorbance of the two recombinant proteins was significantly higher in melioidosis patients sera compared to non-melioidosis sera (data not shown). The sensitivity (90.48 %) of ELISA with FLAG300 was found to be higher compared to a previous report (82.7 %) whilst the specificity (87.14 %) was slightly lower (94.6 %) (Wajanarogana et al. 2013). The previous study used clinically suspected melioidosis sera with serological positive as a reference samples but in this work we used bacterial culture-confirmed sera. Moreover, the numbers of normal serum samples were quite different (40 and 167 samples). An ELISA using the truncated flagellin antigen has been considered in non endemic area by Chen et al. (2003), which demonstrated high sensitivity (93.8 %) and specificity (96.3 %).

Various studies revealed a sensitivity of ELISA with recombinant OmpA antigen from B. pseudomallei between 59–95 and 90–98 % specificity, which were considered at various cut-off points (Allwood et al. 2008; Arora et al. 2015; Hara et al. 2013). In this study, firstly, we detail the use of recombinant OmpA of B. thailandensis (OmpABT) as the potential antigen for diagnostic of melioidosis by developing indirect ELISA. At the cut-off value (mean plus 2SD), good sensitivity (80.95 %) and specificity (89.21 %) were gained which substantially improved over the clinical standard indirect hemagglutination test (IHA). Because the carboxyl-termini of OmpAs are quite conserved within enteric bacteria and B. pseudomallei and contain the immunodominant epitope that is recognized by antibodies formed during the course of infections (Hara et al. 2009; Jeannin et al. 2002; Puohiniemi et al. 1990), infection with these bacteria raises antibody which cross react with OmpABT protein causing reduced specificity. The variable region of recombinant protein could be utilized to increase the specificity of the test although sensitivity might be reduced.

A novel approach using more than a single antigen to improve serodiagnosis of melioidosis has revealed that sensitivity is improved whilst retaining good specificity (Hara et al. 2013). In this study we demonstrate better sensitivity (85.71 %) than OmpABT alone and improved specificity compared to either alone (92.95 %). Besides their utility in the diagnosis of melioidosis, these recombinant antigens should also be considered in the design of a vaccine against B. pseudomallei infection as they induce an immune response (Allwood et al. 2008; Hara et al. 2009; Ye and Gan 2007).

Conclusion

Here, we suggest that the potential antigens of non-pathogenic B. thailandensis could be utilized to develop serodiagnosis of melioidosis within a single protein antigen or double antigens ELISA to eliminate health risks to laboratory personnel for Tier-1 agent exposure.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SW carried out all experiments of molecular cloning and recombinant protein expression and purification, and also prepared and submitted the manuscript. KK performed indirect ELISA and data analysis. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Sunee Korbsrisate, Department of immunology, Faculty of Medical Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand for gifting B. thailandensis E264. We also thank Mr. Nic Braack, language advises at Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine Vajira hospital, Navamindradhiraj University for critical reading of the manuscript.

Competing interests

Both authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Basic Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, 10300, Thailand
(2)
Faculty of Medical Technology, Rangsit University, Muang Ake, Pathumthani, 12000, Thailand

References

  1. Allwood EM, Logue C-A, Hafner GJ, Ketheesan N, Norton RE et al (2008) Evaluation of recombinant antigens for diagnosis of melioidosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 54:144–153View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl Acids Res 25:3389–3402View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Anandan S, Augustine A, Mathai E, Jesudason MV (2010) Evaluation of IgM ELISA using a sonicate and a lipopolysaccharide antigen for the serodiagnosis of melioidosis. Indian J Med Microbiol 28:158–161View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Appassakij H, Silpapojakul KR, Wansit R, Pornpatkul M (1990) Diagnostic value of the indirect hemagglutination test for melioidosis in an endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg 42:248–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora S, Thavaselvam D, Kumar A, Prakash A, Barua A et al (2015) Cloning, expression and purification of outer membrane protein (OmpA) of Burkholderia pseudomallei and evaluation of its potential for serodiagnosis of melioidosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 81:79–84View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashdown LR, Guard RW (1984) The prevalence of human melioidosis in Northern Queensland. Am J Trop Med Hyg 33:474–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brett PJ, Woods DE (1996) Structural and immunological characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei O-polysaccharide–flagellin protein conjugates. Infect Immun 64:2824–2828PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chantratita N, Wuthiekanun V, Thanwisai A, Limmathurotsakul D, Cheng AC et al (2007) Accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using crude and purified antigens for serodiagnosis of melioidosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI 14:110–113View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y-S, Shiuan D, Chen S-C, Chye S-M, Chen Y-L (2003) Recombinant truncated flagellin of Burkholderia pseudomallei as a molecular probe for diagnosis of melioidosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10:423–425PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng AC (2010) Melioidosis: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 23:554–559View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper A, Williams NL, Morris JL, Norton RE, Ketheesan N et al (2013) ELISA and immuno-polymerase chain reaction assays for the sensitive detection of melioidosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 75:135–138View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Corral DM, Coates AL, Yau YCW, Tellier R, Glass M et al (2008) Burkholderia pseudomallei infection in a cystic fibrosis patient from the Caribbean: a case report. Can Respir J J Can Thorac Soc 15:237–239Google Scholar
  13. Dance DA (1991) Melioidosis: the tip of the iceberg? Clin Microbiol Rev 4:52–60View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Deshmukh M, Mundhada S (2013) Chronic suppurative joint effusion due to Burkholderia pseudomallei: a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 56:460–463View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Druar C, Yu F, Barnes JL, Okinaka RT, Chantratita N et al (2008) Evaluating Burkholderia pseudomallei Bip proteins as vaccines and Bip antibodies as detection agents. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 52:78–87View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Essex-Lopresti AE, Boddey JA, Thomas R, Smith MP, Hartley MG et al (2005) A type IV pilin, PilA, Contributes To Adherence of Burkholderia pseudomallei and virulence in vivo. Infect Immun 73:1260–1264View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Felgner PL, Kayala MA, Vigil A, Burk C, Nakajima-Sasaki R et al (2009) A Burkholderia pseudomallei protein microarray reveals serodiagnostic and cross-reactive antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:13499–13504ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hara Y, Mohamed R, Nathan S (2009) Immunogenic Burkholderia pseudomallei outer membrane proteins as potential candidate vaccine targets. PloS One 4(8):e6496. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006496 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hara Y, Chin C-Y, Mohamed R, Puthucheary SD, Nathan S (2013) Multiple-antigen ELISA for melioidosis–a novel approach to the improved serodiagnosis of melioidosis. BMC Infect Dis 13:165View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Haraga A, West TE, Brittnacher MJ, Skerrett SJ, Miller SI (2008) Burkholderia thailandensis as a model system for the study of the virulence-associated type III secretion system of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun 76:5402–5411View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris PNA, Ketheesan N, Owens L, Norton RE (2009) Clinical features that affect indirect-hemagglutination-assay responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI 16:924–930View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeannin P, Magistrelli G, Goetsch L, Haeuw J-F, Thieblemont N et al (2002) Outer membrane protein A (OmpA): a new pathogen-associated molecular pattern that interacts with antigen presenting cells-impact on vaccine strategies. Vaccine 20(Suppl 4):A23–A27View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanaphun P, Thirawattanasuk N, Suputtamongkol Y, Naigowit P, Dance DA et al (1993) Serology and carriage of Pseudomonas pseudomallei: a prospective study in 1000 hospitalized children in northeast Thailand. J Infect Dis 167:230–233View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kunnathuparambil SG, Sathar SA, Tank DC, Sreesh S, Mukunda M et al (2013) Splenic abscess due to chronic melioidosis in a patient previously misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. Ann Gastroenterol Q Publ Hell Soc Gastroenterol 26:77–79Google Scholar
  25. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685ADSView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Leelarasamee A, Bovornkitti S (1989) Melioidosis: review and update. Rev Infect Dis 11:413–425View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lilie H, Schwarz E, Rudolph R (1998) Advances in refolding of proteins produced in E. coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol 9:497–501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Limmathurotsakul D, Jamsen K, Arayawichanont A, Simpson JA, White LJ et al (2010) Defining the true sensitivity of culture for the diagnosis of melioidosis using Bayesian latent class models. PloS One 5(8):e12485. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012485 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Miralles IS, Maciel MdCA, Angelo MRF, Gondini MM, Frota LHF et al (2004) Burkholderia pseudomallei: a case report of a human infection in Ceará, Brazil. Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo 46:51–54View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ngugi SA, Ventura VV, Qazi O, Harding SV, Kitto GB et al (2010) Lipopolysaccharide from Burkholderia thailandensis E264 provides protection in a murine model of melioidosis. Vaccine 28:7551–7555View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Parthasarathy N, DeShazer D, England M, Waag DM (2006) Polysaccharide microarray technology for the detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei antibodies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 56:329–332View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Parthasarathy N, Saksena R, Kováč P, Deshazer D, Peacock SJ et al (2008) Application of carbohydrate microarray technology for the detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei, Bacillus anthracis and Francisella tularensis antibodies. Carbohydr Res 343:2783–2788View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Puohiniemi R, Karvonen M, Vuopio-Varkila J, Muotiala A, Helander IM et al (1990) A strong antibody response to the periplasmic C-terminal domain of the OmpA protein of Escherichia coli is produced by immunization with purified OmpA or with whole E. coli or Salmonella typhimurium bacteria. Infect Immun 58:1691–1696PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Rotz LD, Khan AS, Lillibridge SR, Ostroff SM, Hughes JM (2002) Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents. Emerg Infect Dis 8:225–230View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott AE, Laws TR, D’Elia RV, Stokes MGM, Nandi T et al (2013) Protection against experimental melioidosis following immunization with live Burkholderia thailandensis expressing a manno-heptose capsule. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI 20:1041–1047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sorenson AE, Williams NL, Morris JL, Ketheesan N, Norton RE et al (2013) Improved diagnosis of melioidosis using a 2-dimensional immunoarray. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 77:209–215View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wajanarogana S, Nimnuch P, Thongmee A, Kritsiriwuthinan K (2013) Potential of recombinant flagellin fragment from Burkholderia thailandensis as an antigen for melioidosis antibody detection by indirect ELISA. Mol Cell Probes 27:98–102View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ye Z, Gan Y-H (2007) Flagellin contamination of recombinant heat shock protein 70 is responsible for its activity on T cells. J Biol Chem 282:4479–4484View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu Y, Kim HS, Chua HH, Lin CH, Sim SH et al (2006) Genomic patterns of pathogen evolution revealed by comparison of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, to avirulent Burkholderia thailandensis. BMC Microbiol 6:46. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-6-46 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang S-L, Zhao J-W, Sun Z-Q, Yang E-Z, Yan J-H et al (2009) Development and evaluation of a novel multiple-antigen ELISA for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 89:278–284View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement