Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Short report
  • Open Access

Intraspecific variations in cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton): assessment of genomic diversity by flow cytometry, cytological studies and ISSR analysis

SpringerPlus20165:1560

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3226-x

  • Received: 24 February 2016
  • Accepted: 6 September 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The main goal of the work was to analyse intraspecific variation in Elettaria cardamomum Maton (cardamom) using genome size, cytological studies and molecular marker data. Nuclear DNA content and molecular marker details furnish data on genome size and genetic diversity respectively among the studied accessions and both complement each other for evolutionary and taxonomic studies.

Results

The relative 2C genome size and total number of base pairs of cardamom was determined through flow cytometric analysis using propidium iodide staining. The nuclear DNA content was estimated in various sections of the species representing individuals from wild and cultivar genotypes following Zea mays L. CE-777 (2C = 5.43 pg) as internal reference standard. Chromosome number from growing root tip was examined following standard protocols. Twenty-six ISSR primers that generated polymorphic bands were used for genetic diversity analysis of the thirty accessions of cardamom. Estimated nuclear 2C DNA content ranged from 2.57 to 3.22 pg demonstrating 1.25-fold variation. The mean amount of 2C nuclear DNA of the cardamom was calculated as 2.87 pg which is equivalent of 2806 Mbp as the diploid genome size. The chromosome number was found to be 2n = 48. Among the thirty accessions of cardamom studied using ISSR markers, C53 (feral from Bonacaud) showed a very prominent level of genetic diversity and was lowest for C96 (Avinash-I, a released variety from Indian Institute of Spices Research, Kozhikode).

Conclusion

These analyses revealed the existence of genetic variability within the studied cardamom accessions. The plant specimens also differed significantly in their genome size. However, the genetic variability parameters did not show any correlation with genome size.

Keywords

  • Cardamom
  • Genome size
  • Genetic variation
  • Flow cytometry
  • 2C value
  • Elettaria cardamomum Maton
  • Zingiberace
  • ISSR
  • EST-SSR

Background

Elettaria cardamomum Maton known as Queen of spices belongs to monocotyledonous family Zingiberaceae. This perennial rhizomatous plant is mainly confined to mid-elevations (600–1300 m a.s.l.) in the Western Ghats of South India (Ravindran and Madhusoodanan 2003). It is a shade loving plant and 40–50 % shade promote its vegetative growth and development (Kumar et al. 2015). Dried fruit of small cardamom (commonly called as cardamom) is widely used for culinary and medicinal purposes. It is mainly used as a flavouring agent in food preparations and for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. D-Limonene, one of the constituent of cardamom oil is reported to have tumour suppressing effect against colon, mammary, liver, lung, skin and stomach cancers in rodents (Samir et al. 2015). It has been stated in a US patent (US 20060147561 A1) that a poly herbal formulation including cardamom can be efficiently used for diabetic treatment (Nitasha Bhat et al. 2015).

Cardamom is indigenous to South India and Sri Lanka (Purseglove et al. 1981) and there is a strong belief that the species has been originated in the moist evergreen rainforests of the Western Ghats of South India (Kumar et al. 1997). According to reliable reports, cardamom cultivation began during 1803 in India and until then, cardamom pods were harvested from forests (Ravindran and Madhusoodanan 2003). This means that selection of cardamom with respect to better agronomic traits began around 210 years ago. Further, the cultivation was usually practised in forests after clearing all the undergrowth where cardamom grows naturally. These processes could have gradually eliminated wild cardamom as such and genetic variations there exist. Frequent cultivation of cardamom and targeted selection of peculiar morpho/ecotypes have resulted in the development of many location specific landraces. As in the case of other crop plants, wild cardamom plants (including disease escapes (Venugopal 1999) from abandoned plantations) may have genetic variability and possess alleles that can be effectively used for crop improvement programmes.

Genetic diversity is the basis for development of elite varieties with desirable characteristics. Genetic diversity analysis can be performed using morphological, biochemical and molecular markers (Govindaraj et al. 2015). The biological diversity information which is important for efficacious conservation programmes have become refined by the usage of molecular techniques (Oliveira-Miranda et al. 2013). Molecular markers offer consistent results despite the prevailing environmental circumstances. Among the widely used markers, inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker is a PCR based molecular marker in which a DNA region situated between two similar microsatellite motifs aligned in opposite directions got amplified (Mohammad et al. 2015). So the primers used in this case are microsatellite portions which are tandem repeats of di- to penta-nucleotides. Knowledge on DNA sequence of study organism is not needed for ISSR marker study and can be undertaken for any plant species (Prakashkumar et al. 2015).

ISSR polymorphism has been widely used all over the world to characterize plant genetic variations. It is reported that Iranian Hypericum perforatum L. wild population shows genetic diversity at the intraspecific level estimated using ISSR markers (Mohammad et al. 2015). ISSR profiling revealed 87 % polymorphism in nine varieties of Ginkgo biloba (Zhiqiang et al. 2014). RAPD markers unravelled more information on genetic variability than ISSR markers in Justicia adhatoda L., Caldesia grandis and Dalbergia sissoo (Amit et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2006; Arif et al. 2009). High level of polymorphism was obtained for seven populations of Lemna gibba using five ISSR primers (Aziza et al. 2015). Remarkable level of polymorphism was detected among thirteen accessions of the medicinal plant Rauvolfia serpentina L. with fifteen ISSR primers (Padmesh et al. 2012).

Microsatellites occur in all plant genomes are studied widely for analyzing the genetic variations. They are abundant in non-coding genomic regions, but also detected in coding regions through studies using EST-SSRs (Ranade et al. 2014). For example, in EST databases, an EST-SSR occurs every 14 kb in Arabidopsis (Cardle et al. 2000) and every 19 kb in rice (Temnykh et al. 2001). In contrast to the genomic SSRs, EST-SSRs represent functional markers and changes in EST-SSRs length can cause a phenotypic effect (Li et al. 2004). The significance of EST-SSRs as a molecular tool in genetic studies is well known (Ellis and Burke 2007) and demonstrated in population studies and analysis of genetic diversity in Populus (Xinye et al. 2009); in hybrid selection in Citrus (Rao et al. 2008); and also in genetic mapping in Pinus (Echt et al. 2011) to mention a few. Furthermore, unlike the genomic SSRs, EST-SSRs are easily transferable across species (Kalia et al. 2011), therefore allowing studying polymorphism and genetic diversity in related species (Ellis and Burke 2007). Recently, it has been reported that microsatellites or simple sequence repeats from expressed sequence tags (EST-SSRs) of curcuma shows considerable genetic variation in cardamom (Anjali et al. 2015).

The plant cell nucleus consists of most of the hereditary material and has always been a subject of intensive studies. Nuclear DNA C-value is the amount of DNA incorporated within a haploid nucleus and is expressed in picograms (1 pg DNA = 0.978 × 109 bp) (Dolezel et al. 2003). 2C-value specifies the amount of DNA contained within two copies of unreplicated genome in a nucleus which is in the G1 phase of the cell cycle (Dolezel and Bartos 2005). The First plant genome size determination was done in Lilium longiflorum in the year 1951 (Pellicer and Leitch 2014). Measurement of nuclear DNA amount has paved the way for uncovering broad range of difference in genome size in various organisms (Dolezel et al. 2007). No correlation exists between the genome size and organismal complexity as the eukaryotic genomes consist of large quantities of non-protein coding DNA. Genome size of more than 15,000 species of animals, plants, fungi and protists has been estimated so far (Elliott and Gregory 2015). Kew plant DNA C-value database is the depository for genome size data of plants (http://data.kew.org/cvalues/) and the commonly noticed genome size in Kew database is 500 Mb (Michael 2014). Genome size in Angiosperms ranges from 0.129 pg in Genlisea margaretae to 304.46 pg in Paris japonica (Chen et al. 2014). The important element which determines the genome size is the number of repetitive sequences (Sakurako et al. 1997). Genome size is related to change in periodic biological phenomena of plants, responsiveness to frost, ecological fitting in response to availability of water and organism, tissue, cellular and sub cellular level characters like nuclear and cell volumes, mitotic and meiotic cycles span and seed weight (Suda et al. 2007). Genome size knowledge is required for designing gene cloning, small RNA and whole genome sequencing projects as their scale and cost are determined by genome size.

One of the main applications of flow cytometry is the estimation of genome size. The simplicity in sample preparation, fastness, precision, convenience and the potential to check large numbers of samples per day make flow cytometry an efficient method for estimating genome size in plants (Yue-ping et al. 2015). The first fluorescence based flow cytometer was developed by Wolfgang gohde in 1968. Flow cytometer aids in measurement and counting of particles in a constrained suspension and comprises of three components—fluidics, optics and electronics (Sergio 2008). When illuminated by an intense source of light, these particles absorb and scatter light. If the particles are tagged with any fluorescent dye, it emit fluorescent signals also. The fluorochromes tether stoichiometrically with nucleic acids so that number of probe molecules bound is comparable to the number of DNA molecules. The scattered light and fluorescent signals are perceived by dichroic mirrors, filters and photomultiplier tubes (Galbraith 2010). The software equipped with the instrument translates these signals into a graph in which fluorescent intensity is plotted against cell counts (Sergio 2006). The discovery of such an effortless and precised method for isolating nuclei from solid tissues becomes an innovation in flow cytometry of plant species (Loureiro et al. 2010). The nuclear DNA content of the reference standard used should not be too close or too distant from that of the unknown sample (Milene et al. 2011).

Nuclear DNA content and molecular marker details furnish data on genome size and genetic diversity among accessions respectively and both complement each other for evolutionary and taxonomic studies. In the present study, thirty accessions of cardamom were subjected to nuclear DNA content estimation by flow cytometry and genetic variability analysis using ISSR markers. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel study using two types of techniques which complement each other in deciphering the genetic architecture of cardamom genome.

Methods

Plant materials

Thirty accessions of cardamom including wild collections (those from natural forests), landraces, feral and released varieties were used for genome size estimation and ISSR marker study. All the samples were obtained from the germplasm collection of authors’ Institute. They were originally collected from different parts of Western ghats (Table 1). A portable GPS (Garmin, New Delhi) was used to document the geographic location of accessions collected.
Table 1

Details of cardamom accessions used for genome size estimation and ISSR analysis

Accession no.

Type/name

Location

Latitude

Longitude

C11

Palakkudi (LR)

Anakkuzhy, Idukki

N 09°37′31.09″

E 77°06′07.08″

C16

Feral

Pandimotta

N 08°50′06.11″

E 77°11′03.00″

C17

Feral

Pandimotta

N 08°50′06.11″

E 77°11′03.0″

C26

Wild

Rosemala

N 8°54′49.45″

E 77°10′55.45″

C28

Feral

Bonacaud

N 8°41′33.09″

E 77°10′45.09″

C31

Feral

Bonecadu

N 08°41′37.03″

E 77°10′48.03″

C38

Feral

Cheenikala, Sankili

NA

NA

C39

Feral

Cheenikala, Sankili

NA

NA

C40

Feral

Peppara

N 8°37′11.98″

E 77°11′47.87″

C51

Kanniyelam (Feral)

Maniyaramkudi, Idukki

N 9°53′45.78″

E 76°56′08.28″

C52

Feral

Agasthyamala

N 8°37′03.39″

E 77°13′45.56″

C53

Feral

Bonacaud

N 8°41′52.01″

E 77°10′53.0″

C55

Palakkudi (LR)

Idukki

N 9°41′04.0″

E 77°11′08.0″

C61

ICRI 2 (RV)

Idukki

NA

NA

C62

ICRI 5 (RV)

Idukki

NA

NA

C63

Valli Green Gold (LR)

Idukki

NA

NA

C65

PV2 (RV)

Idukki

N 09°47′48.0″

E 77°09′30.0″

C68

Wild

ICRI, Idukki

NA

NA

C70

Feral

Kakki, Periyar

N 9°18′55.08″

E 77°8′34.08″

C74

Wild

Variyam, Ernakulam

N 10°12′57.01″

E 76°51′26.08″

C75

Wild

Therakkudy, Ernakulam

N 10°13′13.20″

E 76°47′03.07″

C76

Wild

Kulirukadu,A ryankavu

N 9°1′09.02″

E 77°6′08.00″

C77

Wild

Valiyathalappara, Aryankavu

N 9°1′59.01″

E 77°7′59.05″

C81

Feral

IISR IC-349337, Karnataka

NA

NA

C83

Feral

IISR IC-349396, Karnataka

NA

NA

C84

Feral

IISR IC-349399, Karnataka

NA

NA

C86

Feral

IISR IC-349436, Karnataka

NA

NA

C91

Feral

IISR IC 349459, Karnataka

NA

NA

C96

Avinash-1 (RV)

IISR, Karnataka

NA

NA

C97

Appangala-1 (RV)

IISR, Karnataka

NA

NA

RV released variety, LR landrace. Both RV and LR are treated as cultivars

Solanum lycopersicum L. Stupicke polni rane (2C DNA content is 1.96 pg), Glycine max Merr. Polanka (2C DNA content is 2.50 pg) and Zea mays L. CE-777 (2C DNA content is 5.43 pg) obtained from Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany, Sokolovska, Czech Republic were used as internal reference standards for genome size estimation study (Dolezel et al. 2007).

Genome size determination using flow cytometry

Samples were prepared according to a standard two step procedure (Otto 1990). About 50 mg of young and fresh incompletely expanded leaf tissue of test sample and internal standard were co-chopped with a sharp razor blade in a plastic petridish containing 2 ml of ice-cold Otto I buffer (0.1 M citric acid, 0.5 % Tween 20). This was kept at −4 °C for 40 min for releasing nuclei from cells to buffer. The nuclear suspension was filtered through a 40 µm Nylon mesh and centrifuged at 150g for 5 min. Nuclei were gently resuspended in 100 µl of fresh Otto I buffer after removing the supernatant. 1 ml of Otto II buffer (0.4 M Na2HPO4·12H2O) supplemented with propidium iodide for absolute DNA content determination and RNase (both at a final concentration of 100 µg/ml) was added (Bures et al. 2003; Leong-Skornickova et al. 2007; Lysak et al. 2000; Palomino et al. 2003; Pecinka et al. 2006; Roux et al. 2003). All the sample preparation methods were done on ice. The fluorescence intensity of 5000 particles was recorded using a BD FACSAria III Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences, California, USA). Solanum lycopersicum L. Stupicke polni rane, Glycine max Merr. Polanka and Zea mays L. CE-777 were used as internal reference standards to determine the genome size of cardamom and Z. mays L. CE-777 was found to be appropriate reference standard there exist around a twofold variation between the mean peak intensity of the sample and the standard (Petr et al. 2012). Each sample was analysed twice for getting reliable results.

The number of nuclei and coefficient of variation (CV) for peaks of both the cardamom and maize were procured by gating using the BD FACs Diva software. Rectangular gates were drawn manually around the section which is of interest on the histogram of PI fluorescence-Area against PI fluorescence-width to discard the intervention of debris. The mean peak intensity of nuclei of cardamom and maize in the G1 phase of the cell cycle were compared and 2C DNA content of cardamom was estimated (Wang et al. 2015). The formula used to estimate the nuclear DNA content of cardamom (Gregory et al. 2015) was: 2C DNA nuclear content (pg) of cardamom = (sample peak mean/standard peak mean) × 2C DNA content of the reference standard (pg). One way ANOVA and t Test were used to check the significance of genome size variation among the accessions (n = 30) (Sheidai et al. 2014).

Determination of chromosome count

The root tips of cardamom were collected around 10.30 am which is the peak hour of mitotic activity in cardamom plants. Somatic chromosomes from root tip cells were fixed in Carnoy’s fluid (ethanol and glacial acetic acid in the ratio 3:1). The root tips were pretreated in 0.002 M solution of 8-hydroxyquinoline for 2 h at 4 °C. The smear and squash preparations were stained in 2 % acetocarmine, and well spread chromosome preparations were photomicrographed using Leica DM 100 digital camera attached with Leica DM 2500 trinocular microscope (Ngamriabsakul 2004).

ISSR analysis

DNA was isolated from young leaf tissue of the samples using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and quality of the isolated DNA were checked using Biophotometer (Eppendorf India Ltd), 0.8 % agarose gel electrophoresis and was diluted to a final concentration of 50 ng/µl. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out on the plant samples each in 25 µl reaction consisting of 50 ng template DNA, 1× PCR buffer (Origin, Kerala), 200 μM of each of the four dNTPs, 15 pM primer and one unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Origin, Kerala). Thirty-six ISSR primers (IDT, New Delhi) were checked and evaluated for clarity, consistency and number of polymorphisms. Twenty-six primers which created clear bands and amplification profile were finally selected for the study (Table 2). Amplification was carried out with the following conditions: 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min, extension for 2 min at 72 °C, and for 7 min at 72 °C for the final extension using Agilent Sure Cycler (Agilent Technologies, Malaysia). The amplified products were resolved with the aid of 1.4 % agarose gel electrophoresis in 1× TBE buffer and visualized using Safe View™ Classic (Applied Biological Materials, Canada) in gel documentation system (UVP, UK). 1 kb or 100 bp DNA ladder (Origin, Kerala) was loaded in the gel as the size marker.
Table 2

Details of ISSR primers used to analyze genetic diversity in 30 cardamom accessions

Sl. no.

ISSR primer

Sequence

Ta (˚C)

1

S807

5′-TATATATATATATATAC-3′

50.0

2

S809

5′-AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGC-3′

52.0

3

S811

5′-GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAT-3′

50.4

4

S813

5′-GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAC-3′

52.0

5

S817

5′-CACACACACACACACAT-3′

50.0

6

S820

5′-CACACACACACACACAA-3′

50.0

7

S824

5′-TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCC-3′

52.0

8

S826

5′-TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCG-3′

52.0

9

S829

5′-ACACACACACACACC-3′

52.0

10

S834

5′-TGTGTGTGTGTGTGC-3′

52.0

11

S835

5′-AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGYT-3′

50.0

12

S836

5′-AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGYC-3′

50.0

13

S842

5′-GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYC-3′

53.7

14

S844

5′-CTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTRA-3′

50.0

15

S845

5′-CTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTRC-3′

53.0

16

S849

5′-CACACACACACACACARG-3′

53.7

17

S850

5′-GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTCA-3′

53.7

18

S851

5′-GTGTGTGTGTGTGTGTTC-3′

55.8

19

S855

5′-TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCRG-3′

51.0

20

S857

5′-ACACACACACACACACY-3′

53.0

21

S860

5′-ACACACACACACACACTG-3′

53.0

22

S864

5′-TGTGTGTGTGTGTGA-3′

47.0

23

S868

5′-CTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC-3′

47.0

24

S872

5′-GAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGA-3′

40.0

25

S880

5′-CTTCACTTCACTTCA-3′

51.0

26

S895

5′-GGAGAGGAGAGGAGA-3′

51.0

The bands obtained with each primer were scored as diallelic characters: 1 denotes present and 0 denotes absent (Lamyai et al. 2014; Mark et al. 2015). The amplified products extends in size from 200 to 2000 bp. A binary qualitative data matrix was formed and estimated the Observed number of alleles (na), Effective number of alleles (ne), Nei’s gene diversity (h), Shannon’s Information index (I) and number of polymorphic loci (p) using the software POPGENE ver 1.31 (Yeh et al. 1999; Amit et al. 2014).

In an attempt to get a deeper understanding of the relationship between genetic variability and genome size, 2C-values of the accessions which are common in the present study and that of our previous research (Anjali et al. 2015) were subjected to correlation analysis with ISSR and EST-SSR based genetic variability parameters such as number of alleles per loci and polymorphic alleles.

Results

2C nuclear DNA content estimation

Flow cytometric study generated histograms with good resolution peaks (Fig. 1). Nuclear DNA content of thirty accessions of cardamom were estimated (Table 3). 2C DNA amount shows low variation among the studied accessions. Maximum genome size was 3.22 pg shown in accession C61 (ICRI-2, a released variety) and minimum was found in C39 (a wild accession from Cheenikkala, Sankhili) as 2.57 pg. It shows a difference of about 1.25 times. ANOVA and t Test analysis did not find out significant differences in nuclear DNA content among the 30 accessions analysed as wild, feral, and cultivar groups. Mean 2C nuclear DNA content of all the thirty accessions of cardamom was calculated as 2.87 pg and the mean genome size is 2.81 × 109 bp. This is the first report on genome size of E. cardamomum.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Representative flow cytometric histograms (a) cardamom (sample) alone (b) Zea mays (internal reference standard) alone and (c) documenting both cardamom and Z. mays

Table 3

Genome size of the studied accessions categorized into various groups

Acc. no.

Type

2C DNA (pg)

Genome size (bp)

C11

LR

2.82

2.76 × 109

C51

Feral

2.71

2.65 × 109

C55

LR

3.02

2.95 × 109

C61

RV

3.22

3.15 × 109

C62

RV

2.68

2.62 × 109

C63

LR

2.93

2.87 × 109

C65

RV

3.10

3.03 × 109

C96

RV

3.07

3.00 × 109

C97

RV

2.84

2.78 × 109

C16

Feral

2.83

2.77 × 109

C17

Feral

2.89

2.83 × 109

C28

Feral

2.96

2.89 × 109

C31

Feral

2.69

2.63 × 109

C38

Feral

2.78

2.72 × 109

C39

Feral

2.57

2.51 × 109

C40

Feral

2.77

2.71 × 109

C52

Feral

2.95

2.89 × 109

C53

Feral

2.72

2.66 × 109

C70

Feral

2.72

2.66 × 109

C81

Feral

3.04

2.97 × 109

C83

Feral

3.14

3.07 × 109

C84

Feral

2.75

2.69 × 109

C86

Feral

2.85

2.79 × 109

C91

Feral

2.74

2.68 × 109

C26

Wild

2.91

2.85 × 109

C68

Wild

3.14

3.07 × 109

C74

Wild

2.74

2.68 × 109

C75

Wild

2.70

2.64 × 109

C76

Wild

2.97

2.90 × 109

C77

Wild

2.86

2.80 × 109

RV released variety, LR landrace

Chromosome count

The chromosome number was found to be 2n = 48 in the studied accessions by observing the mitotic metaphase stage. The experimental was repeated with different samples, but no variation in chromosome number was observed.

Genetic diversity analysis using ISSR markers

Twenty-six primers that generated polymorphic bands were used for genetic diversity analysis of the thirty accessions of cardamom (Table 4). Twenty-six primers generated 97 bands and polymorphism was shown by 85 bands (87.63 %). The number of polymorphic bands obtained for each primer extends from one (S849) to seven (S845). Shannon’s Information Index (I) differ from 0.23 to 0.54 with an average of 0.37. Among the thirty accessions of cardamom studied, C53 (feral from Bonacaud) showed a very prominent level of genetic diversity (h = 0.38, I = 0.54, P = 80.77 %) and was lowest (h = 0.16, I = 0.23, P = 38.46 %) for C96 (Avinash-I, a released variety from IISR).
Table 4

Genetic diversity indices of the thirty cardamom accessions studied using twenty-six ISSR primers

Accessions

na

ne

h

I

P (%)

C40

1.65

1.50

0.27

0.40

65.38

C26

1.62

1.49

0.26

0.38

61.54

C75

1.65

1.54

0.29

0.41

65.38

C74

1.69

1.57

0.30

0.43

69.23

C68

1.73

1.49

0.28

0.41

73.08

C70

1.69

1.54

0.30

0.43

69.23

C51

1.77

1.61

0.33

0.47

76.92

C17

1.73

1.64

0.34

0.48

73.08

C53

1.81

1.73

0.38

0.53

80.77

C28

1.65

1.58

0.31

0.43

65.38

C52

1.65

1.45

0.26

0.37

65.38

C38

1.50

1.40

0.21

0.31

50.00

C11

1.58

1.48

0.26

0.36

57.69

C76

1.62

1.50

0.27

0.39

61.54

C77

1.77

1.61

0.33

0.48

76.92

C16

1.61

1.53

0.28

0.40

61.54

C63

1.65

1.52

0.28

0.40

65.38

C31

1.58

1.47

0.25

0.36

57.69

C55

1.62

1.52

0.28

0.39

61.54

C61

1.54

1.38

0.21

0.31

53.85

C62

1.58

1.39

0.22

0.33

57.69

C65

1.58

1.46

0.25

0.35

57.69

C39

1.46

1.33

0.19

0.27

46.15

C91

1.38

1.34

0.18

0.25

38.46

C97

1.42

1.35

0.19

0.27

42.31

C96

1.38

1.30

0.16

0.23

38.46

C81

1.58

1.48

0.25

0.36

57.69

C84

1.46

1.36

0.19

0.28

46.15

C83

1.54

1.44

0.23

0.33

53.85

C86

1.54

1.40

0.22

0.32

53.85

Mean

1.60

1.48

0.26

0.37

60.12

SD

0.11

0.10

0.05

0.07

10.85

na = observed number of alleles, ne = effective number of alleles, h = Nei’s gene diversity, I = Shannon’s information index, P (%) = percentage of polymorphic loci

Correlation between genome size and genetic variability

The analysis revealed no correlation between the genetic variability and genome size in the studied accessions (Fig. 2). Further, the thirty accessions were divided into four groups based on their wild/cultivar nature. The one-way ANOVA was estimated from these four groups, viz. feral [n = 16, mean (m) = 2.82, variance (v) = 0.0213], landrace (n = 3, m = 2.92, v = 0.0100), released varieties (n = 5, m = 2.98, v = 0.0474), and wild (n = 6, m = 2.87, v = 0.0257). Since if F(1.4992) < F(2.9752) crit, it was concluded that the four groups did not differ significantly from each other. Further t Tests were also performed to test each of the above pairs of the means. These tests also did not show any significant differences between any of the pairs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Relationship between 2C-value, ISSR and EST-SSR variability. Na stands for number of alleles per locus, P for percentage of polymorphic loci and PIC for Polymorphic Information Content

Discussion

It is obvious that different individuals of same species vary in genome composition due to various evolutionary reasons. Cardamom is one of the species domesticated since modern man started agricultural practices and with a strong desire to satisfy his appetite. Mentions of cardamom are available in old Indian literature written somewhere in 3000 BC (Ravindran and Madhusoodanan 2003). Cardamom cultivation has started in late nineteenth century. Since then, the natural populations of cardamom are slowly replaced by ‘selections’ which narrow down the genetic base and thus the evolutionary potential of cardamom. Some of the remaining of the natural populations of cardamom available in the pristine forest areas of Kerala were collected for this study and analysed along with other available genotypes (Table 1). The present study revealed that the distribution of the genetic diversity and differences in genome size in various accessions are highly randomized having no correlation with the type of the genotype (viz. wild, feral, released variety or cultivar).

Domestication generally leads to changes in many productive traits in crop species when compared to their wild progenitors (Colunga-Garcia et al. 1996; Colunga-Garcia and May-Pat 1997; Casas et al. 1999, 2007). In cardamom, domestication has increased the number of branches and the number of inflorescences per clump, which have resulted in a significant increase in the total number of flowers per clump. These features have obviously resulted in a significant increase in fruit yield in the cultivars (Kuriakose et al. 2008). Considerable variation occurs in cardamom, because it is cross-pollinated (Wardini and Thomas 1999). Studies show that there was no reproductive barrier between wild and cultivated cardamom populations (Kuriakose et al. 2008). Fruits with viable seeds were produced when the accessions used for the present study were subjected to manual cross pollination each other (Sabu and Shefeek, unpublished).

Genome size estimation

Variation in nuclear DNA content was observed among the studied accessions of cardamom which ranged from 2.54 to 3.22 pg. However, this variation was not statistically significant as estimated using one-way ANOVA and t Test. This means that genome size estimates among the 30 accessions or among the various groups (wild, feral, released variety and cultivar) did not differ significantly from each other. According to various reports, intraspecific variation in nuclear DNA content of plants is a disputable subject in the scientific community. Very few studies are reported with remarkable level of intraspecific genome size variation (Bennett and Leitch 2005). As per some of the earlier studies on Collinsia verna, Pisum sativum and Glycine max, it was observed that there was a significant variation. But later Greilhuber (1998) came out with the conclusion that they were merely due to some technical issues. Based on some works which described the variation in genome size within species using authentic controls and standards, Murray (2005) explained that this intraspecific variation has some taxonomic relevance if the former could be related to morphological variation. About 1.19 times variation in genome size was reported for Linum glaucum populations in Iran and difference in nuclear DNA content was found to be associated with altitude and morphological characters (Seyed et al. 2015). Marek et al. (2009) reported a high level intraspecific variation in different populations of Picris hieracioides. Significant level of intraspecific variation was noted in five species of Lathyrus genus (Nandini et al. 1997). The contradiction of having low intraspecific variation and high interspecific variation in diploid Triticeae species proposed that emergence of genome size occurs just before, during or right after the process of speciation (Eilam et al. 2007). 2C nuclear DNA content analysis exhibited a 1.1 fold difference and thus a low level intraspecific variation in Camellia sinesnsis var. assamica (Huang et al. 2013). 1C nuclear DNA content of the populations of Pinus nigra was reported to have around 23 pg (Faruk et al. 2007). Sandra et al. (2015) described that DNA content shows only a small variation within Miscanthus sinensis cultivars. Considerable differences in DNA content was not observed among the five populations of Pinus heldreichii when a t Test was performed (Bogunic et al. 2003).

Genome size in Zingiberaceae members

A search in the C-value database of RBG Kew using the term ‘Zingiberaceae’ resulted in 39 records belonging to 7 genus such as Curcuma, Paracautleya, Hitchenia, Kaempferia, Stahlianthus, Alpinia and Zingiber. Average 2C value of the family is 2.79 pg and the minimum and maximum values are 1.66 and 12.05 respectively. The mean 2C value of cardamom estimated in the present study was 2.87 pg which falls in comparable range of the family.

Use of genome size estimation

In addition to chromosome numbers and ploidy levels, genome size has been estimated in many plants as it is an important attribute in biology and biodiversity (Bennett et al. 2000; Hanson et al. 2001) and pre-requisite for genome sequencing experiments. The co-processed samples with different genome sizes always gave two distinct peaks, which is the most convincing evidence for genuine differences in DNA content (Greilhuber 2005). Genome size variation has significant consequences at cellular, tissue and organismal levels and also influences phenological and ecological behaviour. Comparisons of genome size data within genus and species levels and probable phylogenetic relationships suggest that both increases and decreases of genome size have occurred in evolution (Wendel et al. 2002; Soltis et al. 2003).

Ploidy level and genome size

The occurrence of different chromosome numbers (2n = 48, 52) in cardamom was reported in early cytological studies (Gregory 1936; Sharma and Bhattacharya 1959; Chakravarti 1948). Variations in chromosome numbers were observed in Mysore and Malabar varieties of cardamom indicted that aneuploidy as well as structural alterations in the chromosome have contributed to the varietal differentiation (Chandrasekhar and Sampathkumar 1986). Earlier workers have reported that cardamom is of amphidiploid origin from wild species (Peter et al. 2007). As ploidy level is well correlated with the mode of reproduction, detailed knowledge of genome size in particular species plays an important role in forming hypotheses about evolutionary potential of the species and evolutionary processes in the genus (Chrtek et al. 2007). The present study did not find any ploidy changes among the studied accessions as evident from observations based on cytology and the present flow cytometry analyses. In general, ploidy screening can be done through analysing a test sample with those of the same species having known ploidy using the same instrument settings. This would result in a histogram from which ploidy can be determined from the G1 peak position. The wild cardamom plant collected from Therakkudy, Ernakulam (C75) was screened for chromosome number by root tip squash technique and found to be tetraploid (2n = 4x = 48). While calculating the 2C DNA content of cardamom using maize as internal reference standard, the G1 peak of all the cardamom accessions were positioned around channel 26. So it can be concluded that all the 30 accessions of cardamom that were taken for this particular study are having tetraploid nature.

Genome size and genetic variability

It is well cited that there is no correlation between the amount of DNA per cell and organismal advancement or genetic complexity (Sparrow et al. 1972; Price 1988) which has been historically termed the “C-value paradox” (Thomas 1971). Since the discovery of non-coding DNA and its impact on genome size variation [for example, retrotransposons have increased the size of the maize genome two- to five-fold since the divergence of maize and sorghum from a common ancestor about 16 million years ago (Sanmiguel and Bennetzen 1998)], “paradox” has been replaced by “enigma” in order to address the matter properly (Gregory 2002, 2004). It is now generally agreed that the C-value enigma is due to the differential amplification and proliferation of the repetitive sequences of the genome among organisms (Bennetzen 2000, 2002; Kidwell 2002; Hawkins et al. 2006).

Microsatellites are ubiquitous class of simple repetitive DNA sequences which are abundant in all eukaryotes analyzed and is thought to result from the mutational effects of replication slippage (Tautz and Schlötterer 1994). To find out the relation between genome size and microsatellite occurrence, the microsatellite frequency was analyzed in plant species with a 50-fold range in genome size that is mostly attributable to the recent amplification of repetitive DNA (San Miguel et al. 1998). It was found that the overall frequency of microsatellites was inversely related to genome size and to the proportion of repetitive DNA but remained constant in the transcribed portion of the genome among species (Morgante et al. 2002). This indicates that most microsatellites reside in regions pre-dating the recent genome expansion in many plants. The microsatellite frequency was higher in transcribed regions, especially in the untranslated portions, than in genomic DNA (Morgante et al. 2002). In a more recent study, it was found that EST-SSR density in the coding regions was not associated with genome size in selected genera of woody trees representing gymnosperms (17 species from seven genera) and angiosperms (40 species from eight genera) (Ranade et al. 2014).

In the present study, high genetic variation was observed among different accessions of cardamom using ISSR markers (for example, Shannon’s information index (Table 4) ranged from 0.23 to 0.53, around 130 % increase). Similarly, the variability in genome size was also clearly observed. However, there was no correlation between the increase in the genetic variability parameters and genome size in the studied accessions (Fig. 2) which is at par with a previous finding that EST-SSR density was not associated with genome size in neither angiosperms nor gymnosperms (Ranade et al. 2014).

Conclusion

The present study focuses on intraspecific variation in cardamom with respect to genome size and ISSR data. Variability in genome size was found for different categories of cardamom like wild, feral and cultivar types. Genetic variability was analyzed among the thirty accessions using twenty-six ISSR primers. None of the genetic variability parameters showed a correlation with genome size. It could be concluded that the genetic variability exhibited by the different accessions of cardamom occurs due to minor insertion or deletion of nucleotide sequences. It might be reasonable to assume that retrotransposons that make up the majority of the plant genomes (San Miguel et al. 1998) could be attributable to the increased genome size in some of the cardamom genotypes.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

NA carried out the flow cytometry and mitotic chromosome counting and drafted the manuscript. KMG carried out the molecular marker analysis. FN prepared the nuclei for flow cytometry and participated in the mitotic analysis. SS collected the germplasm and developed the ex situ conservatory. KKS designed and coordinated the study and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) for awarding fellowship for first and second authors and Director, JNTBGRI for providing necessary facilities and funding through plan project (P-114). We extend our sincere thanks to Director and staff of Indian Cardamom Research Institute (ICRI), Myladumpara, Idukki; Head and staff, Cardamom Research Station (CRC), Kerala Agricultural University, Pampadumpara, Idukki for providing cardamom germplasm and Mr. Chandran (Maniyarankudi, Idukki) and Mr. Sureshkumar (Ramakkalmedu) providing necessary help during our field trips for germplasm collection. We acknowledge Prof. Jaroslav Dolezel, Scientific Director, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Republic for providing seeds used as reference standards for the flow cytometry analysis. The authors express their gratitude to Director, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (RGCB) for granting permission to conduct the flow cytometric analysis. We also thank Indu Ramachandran (RGCB) for her assistance with the flow cytometry work. We are indebted to Mr. Shafeek S and Ms. Jero Mathu (JNTBGRI) for collection and management of the cardamom germplasm and cytological observations respectively.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biotechnology and Bioinformatics Division, Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (JNTBGRI), Palode, Thiruvananthapuram, 695562, India

References

  1. Amit K, Priyanka M, Subhash CS, Velusamy S (2014) Efficiency of ISSR and RAPD markers in genetic divergence analysis and conservation management of Justicia adhatoda L., a medicinal plant. Plant Syst Evol 300:1409–1420View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjali N, Sowmya SD, Nadiya F, Sabu KK (2015) Development of EST-SSR markers to assess genetic diversity in Elettaria cardamomum Maton. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 3(2):188–192View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Arif M, Zaidi NW, Singh YP, Haq QMR, Singh US (2009) A comparative analysis of ISSR and RAPD markers for study of genetic diversity in Shisham (Dalbergia sissoo). Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:488–495View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Aziza S, El-Kholy MS, Ebrahem ME (2015) Genetic diversity of Lemna gibba L. and L. minor L. populations in Nile delta based on biochemical and ISSR markers. Egypt J Exp Biol (Bot) 11(1):11–19Google Scholar
  5. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2005) Plant genome size research: a field in focus. Ann Bot 95:1–6View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett MD, Bhandol P, Leitch IJ (2000) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses—807 new estimates. Ann Bot 86:859–909View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennetzen JL (2000) Transposable element contributions to plant gene and genome evolution. Plant Mol Biol 42:251–269View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennetzen JL (2002) Mechanisms and rates of genome expansion and contraction in flowering plants. Genetica 115:29–36View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogunic F, Muratovic E, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2003) Genome size and base composition of five Pinus species from the Balkan region. Plant Cell Rep 22:59–63View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bures P, Tichy L, Wang Y, Bartos J (2003) Occurrence of Polypodium mantoniae and new localities for P. interjectum in the Czech Republic confirmed using flow cytometry. Preslia 75:293–310Google Scholar
  11. Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D, Macaulay D, Marshall D, Waugh R (2000) Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics 156:847–854PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Rojas-Martinez A, Davila P (1999) Reproductive biology and the process of domestication of the columnar cactus Stenocereus stellatus in central Mexico. Am J Bot 86:534–542View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Perez-Negron E, Valiente-Banuet A (2007) In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot 100:1101–1115View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chakravarti AK (1948) Multiplication of chromosome numbers in relation to speciation in Zingiberaceae. Sci Cult 14:137–140Google Scholar
  15. Chandrasekhar R, Sampathkumar K (1986) Karyological highlights on two cultivars of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton). J Cytol Genet 21:90–97Google Scholar
  16. Chen JM, Gituru WR, Wang YH, Wang QF (2006) The extent of clonality and genetic diversity in the rare Caldesia grandis (Alismataceae): comparative results for RAPD and ISSR markers. Aquat Bot 84:301–307View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen SC, Cannon CH, Shian KC, Liu JJ, Galbraith DW (2014) Genome size variation in the Fagaceae and its implications for trees. Tree Genet Genomes 10(4):977–988View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chrtek J, Mraz P, Zahradnieek J, Mateo G, Szel Z (2007) Chromosome numbers and DNA ploidy levels of selected species of Hieracium S.Str. (Asteraceae). Folia Geobot 42:411–430View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Colunga-Garcia MP, May-Pat F (1997) Morphological variation of henequen (Agave fourcroydes, Agavaceae) germplasm and its wild ancestor (A. angustifolia) under uniform growth conditions: diversity and domestication. Am J Bot 84:1449–1465View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Colunga-Garcia MP, Estrada-Loera E, May-Pat F (1996) Patterns of morphological variation, diversity, and domestication of wild and cultivated populations of Agave in Yacatan, Mexico. Am J Bot 83:1069–1082View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Dolezel J, Bartos J (2005) Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot 95:99–110View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J (2003) Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry 51A:127–128View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2243View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Echt CS et al (2011) An annotated genetic map of loblolly pine based on microsatellite and cDNA markers. BMC Genet 12:17View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Sagi-Assif O, Feldman M (2007) Genome size and genome evolution in diploid Triticeae species. Genome 50(11):1029–1037View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott TA, Gregory TR (2015) What’s in a genome? The C-value enigma and the evolution of eukaryotic genome content. Philos Trans R Soc B. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0331 Google Scholar
  27. Ellis JR, Burke JM (2007) EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 99:125–132View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Faruk B, Edina M, Dalibor B, Sonja SY, Spencer B (2007) Genome size stability among five subspecies of Pinus nigra Arnold s.l. Environ Exp Bot 59:354–360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Galbraith DW (2010) Flow cytometry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting in plants: the past, present, and future. Biomedica 30(Suppl):65–70Google Scholar
  30. Govindaraj M, Vetriventhan M, Srinivasan M (2015) Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: an overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet Res Int. Article ID 431487Google Scholar
  31. Gregory PJ (1936) The floral morphology and cytology of Elettaria cardamomum Maton. J Linn Soc (Lond) 50:363–393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gregory TR (2002) A bird’s eye view of the C-value enigma: genome size, cell size, and metabolic rate in the class Aves. Evol Int J Org Evol 56:121–130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gregory TR (2004) Macroevolution, hierarchy theory, and the C-value enigma. Paleobiology 30:179–202MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gregory JJ, Raymond JC, Anthony K, Aina P, Timothy JB (2015) Environmental adaptation in stomatal size independent of the effects of genome size. New Phytol 205:608–617. doi:10.1111/nph.13076 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Greilhuber J (1998) Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Ann Bot 82(Suppl. A):27–35View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Greilhuber J (2005) Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: identifying its existence. Ann Bot 95:91–98View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanson L, Mc Mahon KA, Johnson MAT, Bennett MD (2001) First nuclear DNA C-values for 25 angiosperm families. Ann Bot 87:251–258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Hawkins JS, Kim H, Nason JD, Wing RA, Wendel JF (2006) Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium. Genome Res 16:1252–1261. doi:10.1101/gr.5282906 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang H, Tong Y, Zhang Q-J, Gao L-Z (2013) Genome size variation among and within camellia species by using flow cytometric analysis. PLoS ONE 8(5):e64981. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064981 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK (2011) Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177:309–334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kidwell MG (2002) Tranposable elements and the evolution of genome size in eukaryotes. Genetica 115:49–63View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumar N, Md JBM, Khader A, Rangaswami P, Irulappan (1997) Introduction to spices, plantation crops, medicinal and aromatic plants, 2.12–2.22. Oxford and IBH, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumar PK, Radhakrishnan VV, Hrideek TK, Sunil S, Kuruvilla KM, Sudharshan MR (2015) Shade trees and forage behaviour of honey bees in cardamom plantations. In: Mohanan et al (eds) Prospects in forestry and agriculture. Kerala Forest Research Institute KFRI, Peechi, India, pp 112–117Google Scholar
  44. Kuriakose G, Sinu PA, Shivanna KR (2008) Domestication of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) in Western Ghats, India: divergence in productive traits and a shift in major pollinators. Ann Bot 103:727–733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamyai N, Runglawan S, Arunrat C (2014) Assessment of genotoxicity through ISSR Marker in Pistia stratiotes induced by lead. Environ Asia 7(2):99–107Google Scholar
  46. Leong-Skornickova J, Sida O, Jarolimova V, Sabu M, Fer T, Travnicek P, Suda J (2007) Chromosome numbers and genome size variation in Indian species of Curcuma (Zingiberaceae). Ann Bot 100:505–526View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Li YC, Korol AB, Fahima T, Nevo E (2004) Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol 21:991–1007View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Loureiro J, Travnicek P, Rauchova J, Urfus T, Vit P, Stech M, Castro S, Suda J (2010) The use of flow cytometry in the biosystematics, ecology and population biology of homoploid plants. Preslia 82:3–21Google Scholar
  49. Lysak MA, Rostkova A, Dixon JM, Rossi G, Dolezel J (2000) Limited Genome size variation in Sesleria albicans. Ann Bot 86:399–403View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Marek S, Petr V, Tomas U, Jan S (2009) Complex pattern of genome size variation in a polymorphic member of the Asteraceae. J Biogeogr 36:372–384View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Mark IS, Andrew CC, Fiona MC, Mary G, Chrissen ECG (2015) Are current ecological restoration practices capturing natural levels of genetic diversity? A New Zealand case study using AFLP and ISSR data from mahoe (Melicytus ramiflorus). NZ J Ecol 39(2):190–197Google Scholar
  52. Michael TP (2014) Plant genome size variation: bloating and purging DNA. Brief Funct Genom 13(4):308–317View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Milene MPF, Carlos RC, Wellington RC, Cosme DC (2011) Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the “best primary standards”. Plant Cell Rep 30(7):1183–1191View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Mohammad RM, Mohammad RFM, Ali E, Darab Y (2015) Genetic relationships of Iranian Hypericum perforatum L. wild populations as evaluated by ISSR markers. Plant Syst Evol 301(2):657–665View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W (2002) Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet 30:194–200. doi:10.1038/ng822 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Murray BG (2005) When does intraspecific C-value variation become taxonomically significant? Ann Bot 95:119–125View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Nandini AV, Murray BG, Obrien IEW, Hammett KRW (1997) Intra- and interspecific variation in genome size in Lathyrus (Leguminosae). Bot J Linn Soc 125:359–366Google Scholar
  58. Ngamriabsakul C (2004) A Chromosomal Study of Roscoea and Cautleya (Zingiberaceae): phylogenetic implications. Walailak J Sci Technol 1:70–86Google Scholar
  59. Nitasha Bhat GM, Nayak N, Vinodraj K, Chandralekha N, Mathai P, Cherian J (2015) Comparison of the efficacy of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) with pioglitazone on dexamethasone-induced hepatic steatosis, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia in albino rats. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 6(3):136View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Oliveira-Miranda MA, Martino AM, De Oliveira-Miranda RM, BalboaK AM (2013) Conserving the genetic diversity of plants in Austral and Neotropical America (ANA): a metanalysis of published studies using samples of the region. Bot Rev. doi:10.1007/s12229-013-9128-5 Google Scholar
  61. Otto F (1990) DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. Methods Cell Biol 33:105–110View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Padmesh PP, Sajan JS, Manikantan KM, Jayakumar KS, Subramoniam A (2012) ISSR analysis reveals high intraspecific variation in Rauvolfia serpentina L.—a high value medicinal plant. Biochem Syst Ecol 40:192–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Palomino G, Dolezel J, Mendez I, Rubluo A (2003) Nuclear genome size analysis of Agave tequilana Weber. Caryologia 56:37–46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Pecinka A, Suchankova P, Lysak MA, Travnicek B, Dolezel J (2006) Nuclear DNA content variation among Central European Koeleria taxa. Ann Bot 98:117–122View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Pellicer J, Leitch IJ (2014) The application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size and ploidy level in plants. Mol Plant Taxon Methods Protoc Methods Mol Biol. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_14 Google Scholar
  66. Peter KV, Ravindran PN, Babu KN, Divakaran M (2007) Horticulture: breeding of spice crops (black pepper, cardamom, ginger and turmeric). In: Vegetable science (vegetables, tubers and spice crops). http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/471/1/revised%20Breeding%20of%20spices.pdf. Accessed on 15 Nov 2015
  67. Petr S, Petr B, Jakub S, Lucie H (2012) Measurements of genomic GC content in plant genomes with flow cytometry: a test for reliability. New Phytol 193:513–521. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03942.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Prakashkumar R, Anoop KP, Ansari R, Sivu AR, Pradeep NS, Madhusoodanan PV (2015) Analysis of genetic diversity of Lagenandra spp. (Araceae) of Kerala (South India) using ISSR Markers. Int J Sci Res 4(6):775–777. ISSN No. 2277-8179Google Scholar
  69. Price HJ (1988) Nuclear DNA content variation within angiosperm species. Evol Trends Plants 2:53–60Google Scholar
  70. Purseglove JW, Brown EG, Green CL, Robbins SRJ (1981) Spices. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Ranade SS, Lin YC, Zuccolo A, de Peer YV, García-Gil MR (2014) Comparative in silico analysis of EST-SSRs in angiosperm and gymnosperm tree genera. BMC Plant Biol 14:220. doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0220-8 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Rao MN, Soneji JR, Chen CX, Huang S, Gmitter FG (2008) Characterization of zygotic and nucellar seedlings from sour orange-like citrus rootstock candidates using RAPD and EST-SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes 4:113–124Google Scholar
  73. Ravindran PN, Madhusoodanan KJ (2003) Cardamom: the genus Elettaria. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Roux N, Toloza A, Radecki Z, Zapata-Arias FJ, Dolezel J (2003) Rapid detection of aneuploidy in Musa using flow cytometry. Plant Cell Rep 21:483–490View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sakurako U, Hiroshi I, Nobuko O, Hisako O, Ohtsubo E, Fukui K (1997) Repetitive sequences: cause for variation in genome size and chromosome morphology in the genus Oryza. Plant Mol Biol 35:791–799View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Samir Q, Sasikumar D, Moez AF (2015) Chemopreventive effect of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum L.) against benzo(a)pyrene-induced forestomach papillomagenesis in Swiss Albino Mice. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 34(2):95–104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. San Miguel P, Gaut BS, Tikhonov A, Nakajima Y, Bennetzen JL (1998) The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nat Genet 20:43–45. doi:10.1038/1695 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Sandra C, Maria G, Monika R (2015) Miscanthus: inter- and intraspecific genome size variation among m. ×giganteus, m. sinensis, m. sacchariflorus accessions. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 57(1):1–10Google Scholar
  79. Sanmiguel P, Bennetzen JL (1998) Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by the massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Ann Bot 82(Supplement A):37–44. Article No. bo980746Google Scholar
  80. Sergio JO (2006) Flow cytometry (ploidy determination, cell cycle analysis, DNA content per nucleus). In: Mathesius U, Journet EP, Sumner LW (eds) The Medicago truncatula handbook. The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, United States. ISBN 0-9754303-1-9. http://www.noble.org/Global/medicagohandbook/pdf/MedicagoHandbookv13.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2016
  81. Sergio JO (2008) Flow cytometry in plant breeding. Cytom Part A 73A:581–598View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Seyed MT, Masoud S, Morteza A, Fariba S, Zahra N (2015) Infraspecific morphological and genome size variations in Linum glaucum in Iran. Bio Divers 16(1):69–78. ISSN 1412-033XGoogle Scholar
  83. Sharma AK, Bhattacharya YR (1959) Chromosome studies on two genera of the family Piperaceae. Genetics 29:256–289Google Scholar
  84. Sheidai M, Yari R, Farahani F, Noormohammadi Z (2014) Evaluation of genetic diversity in cultivated (O. europaea subsp. europaea L. ssp. europea var. europaea) and wild olives (Olea cuspidata Wall) using genome size and RAPD markers. Nucleus 57(3):215–222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2003) Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. Am J Bot 90:1596–1603View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sparrow AH, Price HJ, Underbrink AG (1972) A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. Brookhaven Symp Biol 23:451–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Suda J, Krahulcova A, Travnicek P, Rosenbaumova R, Peckert T, Krahulec F (2007) Genome size variation and species relationships in Hieracium sub-genus Pilosella (Asteraceae) as inferred by flow cytometry. Ann Bot 100:1323–1335View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Tautz D, Schlötterer C (1994) Simple sequences. Curr Opin Genet Dev 4(6):832–837. doi:10.1016/0959-437X(94)90067-1 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Temnykh S et al (2001) Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res 11:1441–1452View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Thomas CA (1971) The genetic organisation of chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet 5:237–256View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Venugopal MN (1999) Natural disease escapes as sources of resistance against cardamom mosaic virus causing katte disease of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum Maton). J Spices Aromat Crops 8:145–151MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  92. Wang J, Liu J, Kang M (2015) Quantitative testing of the methodology for genome size estimation in plants using flow cytometry: a case study of the Primulina genus. Front Plant Sci 6:354. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00354 PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Wardini TH, Thomas A (1999) Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. In: Guzman CC, Siemonsma JE (eds) Plant resources of South-East Asia, No. 13. Spices. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 116–120Google Scholar
  94. Wendel JF, Cronn RC, Johnston JS, Price HJ (2002) Feast and famine in plant genomes. Genetica 115:37–47View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Xinye Z, Congwen S, Yadong Z, Yanling Y, Minren H (2009) Development of EST-SSR in Populus deltoides and P. euramericana. Sci Silvae Sin 45:53–59Google Scholar
  96. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX (1999) POPGENE 3.2, user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh
  97. Yue-ping M, Jiang-xue W, Zhi-yang Y, Bing Q, Si-lan D (2015) Characterization of ploidy levels in Chrysanthemum L. by flow cytometry. J For Res 26(3):771–775View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhiqiang M, Md AK, Weimin Z, Junjiang F (2014) DNA fingerprints of living fossil Ginkgo biloba by using ISSR and improved RAPD analysis. Biochem Syst Ecol 57:332–337View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement