Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerPlus
SpringerPlus Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

The biology and in vitro propagation of the ornamental aquatic plant, Aponogeton ulvaceus

  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
SpringerPlus20165:1657

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3041-4

©  The Author(s) 2016

  • Received: 26 May 2016
  • Accepted: 11 August 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Aponogeton ulvaceus Baker (Aponogetonaceae) is a commercially important ornamental aquatic plant species with traditional medicinal uses. Due to the low survival rate of seedlings, propagation by conventional means has been met with many difficulties. In this study, botanical aspects of A. ulvaceus were examined with regards to the morphology, anatomy and physiology of the plant and an efficient protocol for its in vitro propagation using immature tuber explants has been established. The existence of glandular trichomes on the leaves was discovered and the occurrence of circumnutation in A. ulvaceus has been demonstrated. Immature tuber segments with meristems were cultured on MS medium supplemented with various combinations (0, 1, 2, and 3 mg/L) of BAP and NAA for callus induction. The highest percentage of callus production (100 %) was obtained in two different treatments: 1 mg/L BAP and 3 mg/L NAA, and 2 mg/L BAP and 3 mg/L NAA. For shoot and root organogenesis, the combination of 1 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L NAA was shown to be significant for A. ulvaceus regeneration when compared to control, which yields a mean shoot and root number of 22.50 and 29.50 respectively. The current protocol is the first reported successful establishment of in vitro clonal propagation of A. ulvaceus.

Keywords

  • Aponogeton ulvaceus
  • Circumnutation
  • Glandular trichomes
  • Callus induction
  • Plant growth regulators
  • Immature tuber

Background

Aponogeton ulvaceus Baker (Madagascar water lettuce), is a submerged aquatic monocot native to the rivers of central and northern Madagascar (James 1986; Les et al. 2005; Azan 2011). This herbaceous perennial belongs to the family Aponogetonaceae (order Alismatales). Along with other 51 Aponogeton species of perennial aquatics, this plant predominantly distributes in the subtropical and tropical areas of Africa, Madagascar, India, Sri Lanka, Southeast Asia, Australia and New Guinea (Robinson 2011; Grímsson et al. 2014). It thrives well in both stagnant and flowing waters with varying light conditions (extreme shade to intense sunlight) and fluctuating water temperature (22–28 °C) (James 1986). The leaves, arranged in a rosette, may reach up to 60 cm in length and 10 cm in width (Fig. 1a) (Thabrew 2014). They are borne on petioles of equal length arising from a slightly hairy, cone-shaped tuber (Fig. 1b). This Madagascan species survives seasonal dry periods by entering dormancy, whereby the dormant tuber functions as food storage (Ingrouille and Eddie 2006). Inflorescences with a yellow colour grow on long peduncles of varying length according to the water depth (Fig. 1c). The self-sterile inflorescences are composed of 2 spikes and may attain a maximum length of 15 cm (Azan 2011). Flowers are hypogynous, small and sessile (Fig. 1d). They are arranged more or less spirally along the rachis. The ripe fruit of A. ulvaceus is a follicle and it is schizocarpic with a mostly distinct terminal, often curved beak (Fig. 1e) (Lye 1989; Grímsson et al. 2014).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Morphology of A. ulvaceus. a Aquarium grown A. ulvaceus plant; scale bar 5 cm. b A mature tuber with shoots arising from the shoot apical meristem; scale bar 1 cm. c An immature inflorescence borne on rachis (arrow); scale bar 1 cm. d Individual flowers along spikes of mature inflorescence; scale bar 0.5 cm. e Ripe follicles of A. ulvaceus; scale bar 0.5 cm. Note the distinct, curved beak and shrivelled stamens

The genus Aponogeton has been regarded as ideal for use as aquarium plants or water garden ornamentals (Les et al. 2005; Azan 2011). It comprises some of the commercially important aquatic species utilized in the aquatic plant trade. Among the species in the family of Aponogetonaceae, A. ulvaceus has stood out as the popular ornamental aquarium plant that is large and imposing. In addition to its commercial importance and aesthetic appeal, Aponogeton is reported to have medicinal properties such as antidiabetic activity (Munasinghe et al. 2010; Dash et al. 2014). It is also used for treating stomach disorder as well as reviving the digestive system (Shankar and Mishra 2012). Likewise, Aponogeton forms part of the diet of the Anuradhapura District of Sri Lanka (Munasinghe et al. 2010) and some regions of Africa (Pemberton 2000) whereby the consumption of flowers, flower stalks and tubers has been reported. In Cape South Africa, for instance, inflorescence of A. distachyos (waterblommetjie) is a domesticated food crop and a unique South African delicacy.

The unique contortion of the lamina under high light irradiance, resulting in the formation of twisted leaves in a cork-screw manner gave A. ulvaceus its intricate morphology (Czaja 1930). It appears that there are some form of associations between such behaviour and light-induced stress. This could possibly be a strategy of A. ulvaceus to survive excess illumination through leaf movement by orientating and exposing the abaxial surface to light instead of the adaxial side. Intriguingly, the leaves may develop a rufescent colouration under the same conditions (James 1986; Thabrew 2014).

Due to the low survival rate of seedlings in the early stages and thus, difficult to propagate conventionally (Sweeney 2008), A. ulvaceus is in short supply. To meet the high demands for A. ulvaceus, most plants offered for sale in the aquarium trade are harvested from native populations and overharvesting exert pressures on wild sources, resulting in diminutions in density and abundance.

In vitro culture is an excellent alternative method for the large-scale production of this valuable Malagasy species, mitigating both supply and quality predicaments. To date, numerous experimental studies on aquatic plant tissue culture have been reported. Aquatic plant species that have been successfully propagated in vitro include A. madacasgariensis (Carter and Gunawardena 2011), Cryptocoryne wendtii (Stanly et al. 2011), Hygrophila polysperma (Roxb.) T. Anderson (Çinar et al. 2013), Myriophyllum spicatum L. (Zhou et al. 2006), Nymphoides indica (Jenks et al. 2000), Pogostemon helferi (Wangwibulkit and Vajrodaya 2016) and Potamogeton crispus L. (Zhou et al. 2006). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing the micropropagation of A. ulvaceus. In this study, specific aspects of A. ulvaceus morphology, anatomy and physiology were investigated in order to supplement the earlier literature and an efficient clonal micropropagation system via indirect organogenesis was established.

Methods

Plant materials and culture conditions

A. ulvaceus plants were supplied by local aquarium plant trader. The plants were maintained in water-filled tanks until flowering. Mature flowers were cross-pollinated with fresh pollens from plants of the same species. Spikes with seed-bearing follicles were disinfected in 70 % (v/v) ethanol for 30 s, followed by 0.4 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 20 min. Seeds were subsequently removed from follicles and germinated on basal MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) (Duchefa Biochemie B. V.) containing 3 % (w/v) sucrose (Fisher Scientific) and 0.35 % (w/v) Phytagel (Sigma-Aldrich). To prevent desiccation, seeds were submerged in liquid MS medium. All media were adjusted to pH 5.8 and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min. Cultures were maintained at 25 ± 1 °C under a 16 h photoperiod (40 μmol m−2 s−1) provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps (Akari TLD36W/54). In vitro-raised plantlets were subcultured at 21-day intervals into fresh MS basal medium.

Morphological, anatomical and physiological studies

Developing seedling and mature plant samples were used for morphological analysis. Plant samples were subjected to imaging with an AZ100 dissecting microscope equipped with a Digital Sight DS-5Mc camera (Nikon) to characterize the distinct developmental features of A. ulvaceus. To identify the anatomical structures, transverse sections of fresh leaf midrib and petiole samples were prepared and mounted in sterile distilled water to prevent desiccation for microscopic examination.

An interesting phenomena with respect to the physiology of A. ulvaceus known as circumnutation was investigated. Plant movements are often considered as a result of an environmental stimulus reaction. Circumnutations, however, are autonomous helical movements of plant organs whereby the tips outline a circular, full-ellipsis, pendulum-like shape or irregular zigzags over a sufficiently long period (using time-lapse video method) (Stolarz 2009). For circumnutation observations and measurements, a mature plant was cultivated in a shallow-water acrylic tank measuring 26 cm in depth from the water surface to the base of the plant at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C) under continuous illumination. Time-lapse video of the oscillating growth patterns of a 4-day-old shoot apex was recorded by lapse it (interactive universe). Camera parameters remained constant throughout the experiment and time-lapse images were recorded one frame per 5 min intervals for 9 h. The plant was filmed from the top-view. Time-lapse images were digitized using Circumnutation Tracker (CT) (Stolarz et al. 2014) and Microsoft Excel programs.

Callus induction and organogenesis

Immature tubers with meristems obtained from in vitro-raised plantlets were used as explant materials. Tuber explants were longitudinally dissected into four equal sections and cultured on MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of BAP (0, 1, 2, and 3 mg/L) in combination with NAA (0, 1, 2 and 3 mg/L) for callus induction and subsequent regeneration (Carter and Gunawardena 2011). To prevent desiccation, liquid MS was poured over the explants to submerge the entire tuber segment. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) were filter-sterilized (0.2 μm pore size, Minisart, Sartorius Stedim Biotech) before being added to molten autoclaved MS. The experimental design was completely randomized with four culture samples per treatment and each treatment was replicated thrice under the same conditions as above. The frequency of explants producing callus was determined after 28 days of culture. Subsequently, the evaluation was repeated 56 days later on the shooting and rooting responses. Likewise, the number of shoots and roots per explant was determined.

Statistical analysis

Statistical tests were performed with Genstat 10 for Windows. Percentage data of initial callusing was analysed using Kruskal–Wallis test. Prior to statistical analysis, the mean number of both shoots and roots at day 28 was subjected to logarithm transformation. The square root was used for the mean number of shoots and roots analysis at day 56 and arcsine transformation for the percentage of organogenic explants experiment in day 28 and 56. Data were tested for normality and analysed using one-way ANOVA. The mean data were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test with a 0.05 confidence interval.

Results

Morphological features

Owing to the lack of literature on this economically important aquatic macrophyte, little is known about its morphology and almost nothing in regards to the anatomical structures of A. ulvaceus. Therefore, the present study examined several characteristics of this plant species and provided a detailed description on these aspects. Observational data showed that A. ulvaceus is monoecious, with perfect flowers, where both male and female organs occur together (Fig. 2a). The stamens generally appear in 4–7, but most often six surrounding the female structures in the centre. Anthers are of 2-thecate and pollens are always yellow. Likewise, the darker green carpels exist in 3–5 (usually three free carpels), unilocular and are pear-shaped. Each carpel will give rise to individual fruit. The isobilateral bright green (sometimes pale green) leaves are translucent and wavy; blades are often undulated and sometimes contorted (Fig. 1a). The blades usually have a distinct midrib with three or four pairs of parallel, confluent nerves connected by numerous cross-veins.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Morphological and anatomical features of A. ulvaceus. a Close up image of individual flowers of A. ulvaceus; scale bar 0.2 cm. b Glandular trichomes (arrows) on leaf surface; scale bar 100 μm. c Cross section of a petiole; scale bar 500 μm. d A transverse section of the leaf midrib; scale bar 1000 μm. e A closer view of the honeycomb aerenchyma (HA), extensive lacunae and diaphragms; scale bar 200 μm

Trichomes discovered fortuitously and may contribute to plant resistance against herbivory

Remarkably, glandular trichomes were observed on A. ulvaceus in the present study (Fig. 2b). No findings related to the development of trichome have thus far been reported. Located on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of the leaves and along the petioles, trichomes formed sparingly and were scattered over the entire surface. Of note, young leaves remained glabrous and during the third week of growth, trichome formation initiated. In the case of in vitro-raised plantlets, however, trichome development was not detected. Interestingly, a single type of detritivore was observed coexisting in the water in which the analysed plants were maintained. Therefore, we hypothesized that a resistance mechanism could have been triggered in response to damage caused by the detritivores. In an effort to test the possibility of induced trichome production, an observational analysis was conducted ex vitro on in vitro-raised plants whereby these were transferred to a water-filled tank containing sterile aquarium substrate. Again, trichome formation was not observed (0 out of 5). Thus, these results imply that A. ulvaceus is capable of induced trichome formation in response to herbivory.

Anatomical adaptations of A. ulvaceus to an aquatic environment

Dissection and microscopic examination exhibited that honeycomb type aerenchyma, characterized by the irregular and large air spaces, was observed in the shoots of A. ulvaceus (Fig. 2c, d). Freshly cut transverse sections of leaf midrib revealed that a large proportion of the cellular volume is occupied by an air-filled lacunae system (Fig. 2d). Parenchyma cells that surround the lacunae and at least seven vascular bundles occupied the remaining cellular volume. The same midrib cross section showed the presence of small hexagonal diaphragm cells in some of the lacunae (Fig. 2e). Together, these results demonstrate the successful adaptation of A. ulvaceus to a submerged aquatic environment, as anatomical modifications of the shoot such as the existence of air-filled aerenchyma, the extensive lacunae system and cellular diaphragms are evident.

Circumnutation behaviour of A. ulvaceus shoots

The movements of a growing 4-day-old shoot were tracked using the time-lapse video method (Additional file 1: Video S1). Circumnutation parameters and trajectory of shoot apex were subsequently generated using CT software. The oscillation pattern of the shoot depicts a wide ellipse with a shape coefficient of 0.84 and it circumnutated in a counter-clockwise (ccw) direction (left-handed) (Fig. 3a). It was found that the tip organ assumes the irregularly zigzag trajectory of circumnutation, although previously it was demonstrated that rosette-like trajectory also occurs in A. ulvaceus (Fig. 3b). The circumnutation period of the shoot typically reaches 110 min with amplitude (length) of 77.15 mm. Taken together, these qualitative observations demonstrate the occurrence of circumnutation in the aquatic plant A. ulvaceus, especially in the actively growing parts of plant organs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Top-view of the circumnutation trajectories of A. ulvaceus shoots. a Irregular zigzag circumnutation. Shoot movement marked by colour gradients beginning from red to blue line. Trajectory was recorded at 5 min intervals and extracted from CT. b Rosette-like circumnutation; scale bar 2 cm. Each point indicates tip position at 5 min intervals. Direction of movement as shown by arrowhead

In vitro regeneration of shoots and roots

Indirect organogenesis of A. ulvaceus under the influence of different concentrations of BAP and NAA was investigated. Results on callus induction and organogenesis using immature tuber tissues with meristems are shown in Table 1. Compact, yellowish green globular calli were formed after 4 weeks of incubation (Fig. 4a–c). Among the PGR combinations tested, T5 has yielded the highest number of shoots per explant (3.67) in day 28 (Table 1). However, after 8 weeks of incubation, shoot number of T3 culture increased up to 14.7-fold as compared to 28 days of growth with an overall highest mean shoot number (50.44). It is worth noting that longer exposure time of explants to BAP and NAA is critical for shoot regeneration and subsequent mass propagation as can be seen in the significant increase in % shoots and mean number of shoots in all the treatments compared to the control (Table 1).
Table 1

Effects of BAP and NAA in combination on shoot regeneration from callus of A. ulvaceus after day 28 and 56 of culture

Treatment

Plant growth regulators (mg/L)

% shooting

Mean number of shoots per explant

BAP

NAA

Day 28

Day 56

Day 28

Day 56

T0

0

0

25.0ab

33.3a

0.67 ± 1.15a

6.92 ± 11.98a

T1

1

1

33.3ab

100.0b

1.75 ± 1.25a

22.50 ± 5.24b

T2

1

2

50.0ab

91.7b

2.67 ± 3.78a

37.17 ± 38.11b

T3

1

3

50.0b

83.3b

3.42 ± 1.42a

50.44 ± 30.63b

T4

2

1

25.0ab

100.0b

2.92 ± 3.17a

40.34 ± 12.57b

T5

2

2

41.7ab

75.0b

3.67 ± 1.28a

39.33 ± 1.91b

T6

2

3

66.7b

91.7b

2.17 ± 1.28a

31.65 ± 16.40b

T7

3

1

30.0ab

91.7b

0.75 ± 0.25a

31.33 ± 11.75b

T8

3

2

8.3a

66.7b

1.50 ± 2.60a

15.00 ± 9.69b

T9

3

3

50.0b

91.7b

2.25 ± 1.52a

29.41 ± 19.30b

Results represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicated experiments. Different letters in each column indicate significant difference of mean values (P < 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Indirect organogenesis from tuber-induced callus. a–c Developing yellowish green globular callus after 4 weeks. Callus formed on the edges of excised surface and proliferate on the entire surface of tubers; scale bars 0.5 cm. Note the purple colouration of callus in c. d Multiple shoot and root development from a single callus piece. Long shoots are trimmed to ease handling; scale bar 2 cm. e Multiple shoot apical meristems developing on callus; scale bar 0.8 cm. f An individual immature tuber with two shoots growing from the callus tissue; scale bar 0.6 cm. g–h Root development from callus tissue; scale bars 0.6 and 0.8 cm respectively

The morphogenetic response of callus to form roots on different BAP and NAA combinations is presented in Table 2. It was observed that root development commonly initiates following the development of shoots from the callus (Fig. 4d). T1 showed a similar positive effect on root regeneration that yielded an average root number of 29.50, which is significantly higher than control (i.e. 7.9-fold). The best response was observed in T4 after 56 days with the highest root number of 44.58. At 9 weeks of culture, multiple shoot apical meristems with proliferating green shoots and roots are clearly visible on the globular calli (Fig. 4e–h). Thus, these results corroborate the feasibility of A. ulvaceus micropropagation from callus induction using immature tuber tissues.
Table 2

Effects of BAP and NAA in combination on root regeneration from callus of A. ulvaceus after day 28 and 56 of culture

Treatment

Plant growth regulators (mg/L)

% rooting

Mean number of roots per explant

BAP

NAA

Day 28

Day 56

Day 28

Day 56

T0

0

0

8.3a

33.3a

0.33 ± 0.58a

3.75 ± 6.50a

T1

1

1

16.7a

75.0b

0.67 ± 0.63ab

29.50 ± 3.68b

T2

1

2

16.7a

58.3b

0.33 ± 0.38ab

30.00 ± 19.64b

T3

1

3

41.7a

50.0ab

4.25 ± 4.26b

31.58 ± 12.35b

T4

2

1

16.7a

91.7b

2.42 ± 2.27ab

44.58 ± 17.89b

T5

2

2

8.3a

66.7b

0.08 ± 0.14a

24.17 ± 9.15b

T6

2

3

8.3a

75.0b

0.42 ± 0.72ab

27.08 ± 7.37b

T7

3

1

25.0a

91.7b

1.00 ± 0.87ab

32.00 ± 20.22b

T8

3

2

8.3a

66.7b

0.75 ± 1.30ab

20.17 ± 8.14b

T9

3

3

16.7a

83.3b

1.00 ± 1.73ab

22.25 ± 20.88b

Results represent mean ± SD of three replicated experiments. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences of mean values (P < 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test

Discussion

As aforementioned, scientific literatures of A. ulvaceus are lacking, especially the morphology and anatomical structures, about which little is known. Consequently, discrimination of true species from hybrids is difficult and this will affect the marketable quality of the plant. In the present study several important characteristics of this Malagasy species were identified by observational analysis. The discovery that A. ulvaceus is monoecious, as corroborated by the presence of both male and female reproductive organs in a single flower, is consistent with the premise that Aponogetonaceae is usually monoecious and seldom dioecious (van Bruggen 1998). Other features such as the occurrence of stamens in six and carpels in three as well as blade structures were described in details in the current study. The unique foliage shape of A. ulvaceus, with long, wavy and often contorted leaves indicates its adaptability to rapidly flowing water similar to other Aponogeton species (Hellquist and Jacobs 1998). In addition, the undulated leaf margins of A. ulvaceus is suggested to help minimize the boundary layer thickness in low water velocities by creating turbulence, which in turn increases the uptake of dissolved inorganic carbon (Raven et al. 1985).

In this study, we report, for the first time, the presence of glandular trichomes on leaf surfaces and petioles of A. ulvaceus. However, we found that none of the in vitro-cultured plants have trichomes. Likewise, leaf surfaces of in vitro-raised plants grown ex vitro remained glabrous. A marked difference observed was there were no detritivores (organisms feeding on dead plant materials) inhabiting the water in the ex vitro study, thus in vitro-raised plants were not damaged. The detritivores could have inflicted damage to live cells while feeding on dead plant parts. It is, therefore, reasonable to speculate that the leaf trichome formation in A. ulvaceus is a response following damage caused by herbivory. In this regard, A. ulvaceus, that was previously glabrous, produces new leaves with trichomes that start developing in the third week of growth which may be favourable, as it increases resistance against herbivores (Dalin et al. 2008). This is similar to the resistance mechanism of several plant species whereby new leaves with increased trichome number or density are produced (Traw and Bergelson 2003; Björkman et al. 2008). Our finding provides the first evidence that such a response occurred in A. ulvaceus and further field studies addressing functional and adaptive significance of induced trichome development should be evaluated in the context of effects on tritrophic interactions and plant fitness under varying abiotic conditions.

Submerged aquatic macrophytes are highly advanced as they have evolved specialized anatomical structures, enabling them to flourish in aquatic environments while growing in anoxic rooting substrate. It has been suggested that aerenchyma is responsible for the oxygen supply to aquatic plant roots, thereby facilitating internal oxygen transport and enhancing metabolic efficiency (Armstrong et al. 1991). The aerenchyma lacunae form a relatively continuous pipeline system through plants which generally provide a pathway that allows adequate aeration of roots, supporting respiration of submerged tissues (Maricle and Lee 2002). However, Rascio (2002) pointed out that while emergent and floating-leaf plants are dependent on the internal oxygen transport from leaves to roots via the air lacunae system, submerged species acquire these gases through diffusion. Thus, leaves of the latter species are usually thin, translucent and do not possess developed aerenchyma, if leaves are entire. Interestingly, in A. ulvaceus, the presence of honeycomb-like aerenchyma and an extensive lacunae system were observed in the midrib. On the basis of such evidence, A. ulvaceus plants could have evolved to adapt in both lotic and lentic environments. It is possible that during seasonal dry periods, leaves are exposed to the oxygen-rich atmosphere, thus A. ulvaceus will rely on the aerenchyma for oxygen supply since the diffusion coefficient of oxygen transport in water is much lower than in air (Aachib et al. 2004). Similarly, respiration of A. ulvaceus when fully submerged underwater will be facilitated by diffusion via its leaves, as oxygenation is higher due to turbulence in the lotic environment (Lusa et al. 2011). The existence of cellular diaphragms within the lacunae, exhibiting a marked cell dimorphism, is yet another anatomical adaptive strategy found in A. ulvacues. Apart from providing lateral support to stem and cross bundles, other functions of diaphragms include tannin storage (Snow 1914), carrying laticifers (Stant 1964), photosynthetic capability (Kaul 1973) and preventing internal flooding caused by injury (Soukup et al. 2000).

The twisting and rotating movements of rapidly elongating plant organs (hypocotyl, tendril, shoot or root) have long became a fascination to biologists and have spawned a variety of studies on terrestrial plants. In the present investigation, the occurrence of circumnutation has been demonstrated in the aquatic plant A. ulvaceus using the novel software CT. The mechanisms and functional importance underlying circumnutation has long been debated since Darwin’s time. At present, it is presumed that circumnutation is dependent upon the internal oscillatory movement and gravity sensing. In the hydrophyte Vallisneria, however, female flowers are capable of circumnutating in the absence of gravitropism. The paper by Kosuge et al. (2013) indicated that the helical intercalary growth of the peduncle, the internal oscillator, is the driving force of circumnutation. As buoyancy minimizes the gravity effect, which renders it difficult to study circumnutation in land plants due to the innate nature of gravitropic response, shoot movements underwater are interesting. Then again, mutant analyses on agravitropic mutants of morning glory that lack starch-filled amyloplasts in endodermal cells were defective in shoot circumnutation, indicating the importance of gravitropic response (Kitazawa et al. 2005). Additionally, there is increasing evidence that circumnutations possess distinct ecological functions and are not simply a way of growth. In Oryza sativa, circumnutating roots have a significant role in seedling establishment on waterlogged and soft soil (Inoue et al. 1999). Likewise, circumnutation in Vallisneria is crucial for hydrophilous pollination on the water surface (Kosuge et al. 2013). In this regard, circumnutation proves to be a complex phenomenon and dependent on plant species, the organs involved and the developmental stage (Kitazawa et al. 2005; Stolarz 2009). Clearly, further analysis is warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanism of circumnutation in A. ulvaceus as well as the implicated ecological functions of shoot movements.

The procedure described here is the first successful in vitro micropropagation system for A. ulvaceus via indirect organogenesis. Based on the evidence, immature tubers with meristems were the most successful explant in callus induction and subsequent organogenesis. Due to their physiological state of being young, healthy and nutrient-rich, immature tubers are ideal explant sources. Younger explants exhibiting greater morphogenic potential has already been established (Yepes and Aldwinekle 1994) owing to their meristematic properties and increased totipotency in vitro (Razdan 2003). However, in other sources such as leaves, petioles and root tips of A. ulvaceus, lethal browning of tissue was one of the impediments to callus induction. Our findings are in conformity with the results of Carter and Gunawardena (2011), who observed no callus formation in petioles and root tips of A. madagascariens due to browning. Such phenomenon can be attributed to the exudation and oxidation of phenolic compounds in the culture medium as a defence response following tissue wounding or stress (Jones and Saxena 2013).

In A. ulvaceus, the BAP and NAA combination was found to be suitable for callus induction and organogenesis. This hormonal combination has been extensively utilized for indirect organogenesis in various protocols developed for other plant species of Aponogeton (Carter and Gunawardena 2011), Artemisia (Tariq et al. 2014) and Saussurea (Zhao et al. 2001; Dhar and Joshi 2005). Taking into consideration that indirect morphogenic routes can generate somaclonal variation in micropropagated progenies causing both genetic and epigenetic alterations (Ramírez-Mosqueda and Iglesias-Andreu 2015), these genetic variabilities can be exploited for genetic improvement of ornamental species with growing economic importance such as A. ulvaceus (Sun et al. 2013; Krishna et al. 2016).

In the present investigation, regeneration capacity of A. ulvaceus shoots and roots was significantly enhanced with the addition of BAP and NAA to MS medium. Maximum root numbers (45 roots per explant) were produced in response to 2 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L NAA (T4). These results are in agreement with Oh et al. (2008), who reported that a lower concentration of auxin is optimal for rooting. Under the same treatment condition, however, shoot proliferation response was onefold (40 shoots per explant) lower than that obtained with 1 mg/L BAP and 3 mg/L NAA (T3) (50 shoots per explant). This suggests the importance of the ratio of auxin (NAA) to cytokinin (BAP) in the manipulation of plant regeneration in A. ulvaceus. The significance of the auxin to cytokinin ratio in culture medium has been highlighted by several reports. It was indicated that auxins at lower concentrations along with cytokinins are critically important in plant regeneration in a number of systems such as Coffea arabica (Zoriniants et al. 2003), Eleusine indica (Yemets et al. 2003) Juncus effusus (Xu et al. 2009) and Senecio candicans (Hariprasath et al. 2015). Though findings in relation to the effectiveness of culture media supplemented with BAP (2 mg/L) and NAA (1 mg/L) on shoot regeneration have been reported in S. candicans (Hariprasath et al. 2015), the differential response may be attributed to the inhibitory effect of higher BAP concentrations on shoot multiplication. Similar observations on the inhibitory effect of BAP were also reported in Tinospora cordifolia (Raghu et al. 2006) and Sida cordifolia (Sivanesan and Jeong 2007).

With no statistical difference between PGR treatments on shoot regeneration, the best responses were found in MS media supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP and 3 mg/L NAA, and 2 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L NAA. However, in the latter treatment, it was shown to be more effective on root regeneration. Despite the increased regeneration capacity induced by both treatments, it was found that suboptimal shoot and root numbers of 22.50 and 29.50, respectively, were significantly produced with 1 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L NAA (T1) when compared to control explants. Based on these observations, it appears that A. ulvaceus is rather responsive to phytohormones, as the addition of low concentrations of PGR is sufficient to induce regenerative responses in tuber explants. Our results are in agreement with recent reports on Humulus lupulus whereby explants exhibited high sensitivity to changes in auxin concentration and low IAA concentration was beneficial for shoot initiation from callus tissues (Trojak-Goluch et al. 2015). As highlighted by Hill and Schaller (2013), plants capable of accumulating higher levels of bioactive cytokinin are generally more receptive to methods employed for the induction of de novo shoot organogenesis and in vitro plant regeneration. It is possible that the presence of the mechanisms necessary for plant regeneration may positively impact A. ulvaceus regenerative capability, allowing it to readily undergo callus induction and organogenesis. Another possible explanation is that tuber or bulb explants having larger nutrient reserves tend to readily regenerate in vitro and are more independent of the hormones in growth medium (Yildiz 2012).

In consideration of the production cost of in vitro mass propagation of A. ulvaceus, the use of lower concentrations of plant hormones is more cost effective. Also, low hormone concentrations are often associated with lower incidence of or no somaclonal variation (Swartz 1991). Thus, it can be concluded that MS medium containing 1 mg/L BAP with 1 mg/L NAA was the optimal combination for callus induction and subsequent organogenesis of A. ulvaceus. This protocol could potentially be used for the commercial propagation of this economically valuable aquatic plant. In addition, with the present regeneration system, further research should focus on evaluating: (1) the functional and adaptive significance of induced trichome formation; (2) the underlying molecular mechanism of circumnutation in A. ulvaceus and its implicated ecological functions of shoot movements; and (3) the mutational possibilities during regeneration which could affect plant behaviour including circumnutation.

Conclusion

This study provides useful information on the biology of the ornamental plant A. ulvaceus. Through close examination of A. ulvaceus, glandular trichomes were found to be present on the leaves. By recording time-lapse videos to track the movement of shoots, it was found that the shoots moved in a specific trajectory known as circumnutation. The study on the morphology, anatomy and physiology of A. ulvaceus will provide a more in depth understanding of the plant as well as its functions and applications.

Since A. ulvaceus is a much sought after ornamental aquatic plant, mass multiplication of the plants is essential for preserving this rare species in their natural habitat. We have successfully developed an in vitro regeneration protocol in this study through an intermediate callus phase using MS medium supplemented with 1 mg/L BAP and 1 mg/L NAA. This protocol will provide an alternative method with the potential to mass propagate A. ulvaceus.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MYYK conducted the experiment and prepared the manuscript. LCC did the data analysis and samples preparations. CFC initiated the project and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Education for the FRGS grant and the School of Biosciences, Faculty of Science of the University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus for the internal fund provided to support this project. Also, the authors would like to thank Dr. Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz for kindly allowing us to use his time-lapse video camera.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Science, School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

References

  1. Aachib M, Mbonimpa M, Aubertin M (2004) Measurement and prediction of the oxygen diffusion coefficient in unsaturated media, with applications to soil covers. Water Air Soil Pollut 156:163–193View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong W, Justin SHFW, Beckett PM, Lythe S (1991) Root adaptation to soil waterlogging. Aquat Bot 39:57–73View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Azan SSE (2011) Invasive aquatic plants and the aquarium and ornamental pond industries. Theses and dissertations, Ryerson UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Björkman C, Dalin P, Ahrné K (2008) Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. New Phytol 179:176–184View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter J, Gunawardena AHLAN (2011) Regeneration of the aquatic monocot Aponogeton madagascariensis (lace plant) through callus induction. Aquat Bot 94:143–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Çinar A, Karataş M, Aasim M (2013) High frequency plant regeneration of Dwarf Hygro (Hygrophila polysperma [Roxb.] T. Anderson) on liquid culture. J Appl Biol Sci 7:75–78Google Scholar
  7. Czaja AT (1930) Die photometrischen Bewegungen der Blätter von Aponogeton ulvaceus. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 48:349–362Google Scholar
  8. Dalin P, Ågren J, Björkman C, Huttunen P, Kärkkäinen K (2008) Leaf trichome formation and plant resistance to herbivory. In: Schaller A (ed) Induced plant resistance to herbivory. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 89–105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dash S, Kanungo SK, Dinda SC (2014) Antidiabetic activity of Aponogeton natans (Linn.) Engl. & Krause—an important folklore medicine. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 6:574–577Google Scholar
  10. Dhar U, Joshi M (2005) Efficient plant regeneration protocol through callus for Saussurea obvallata (DC.) Edgew. (Asteraceae): effect of explant type, age and plant growth regulators. Plant Cell Rep 24:195–200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grímsson F, Zetter R, Halbritter H, Grimm GW (2014) Aponogeton pollen from the Cretaceous and Paleogene of North America and West Greenland: implications for the origin and palaeobiogeography of the genus. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 200:161–187View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hariprasath L, Jegadeesh R, Raaman N (2015) In vitro propagation of Scenecio candicans DC and comparative antioxidant properties of aqueous extracts of the in vivo plant and in vitro-derived callus. S Afr J Bot 98:134–141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hellquist CB, Jacobs SWL (1998) Aponogetonaceae of Australia, with descriptions of six new taxa. Telopea 8:7–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill K, Schaller GE (2013) Enhancing plant regeneration in tissue culture: a molecular approach through manipulation of cytokinin sensitivity. Plant Signal Behav 8:e25709View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingrouille MJ, Eddie B (2006) Plants: diversity and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Inoue N, Arase T, Hagiwara M, Amano T, Hayashi T, Ikeda R (1999) Ecological significance of root tip rotation for seedling establishment of Oryza sativa L. Ecol Res 14:31–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. James B (1986) A fishkeeper’s guide to aquarium plants. Tetra Press, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenks MA, Kane ME, McConnell DB (2000) Shoot organogenesis from petiole explants in the aquatic plant Nymphoides indica. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 63:1–8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones AMP, Saxena PK (2013) Inhibition of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L.: a novel approach to reduce oxidative browning in plant tissue culture. PLoS One 8:e76802ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaul RB (1973) Development of foliar diaphragms in Sparganium eurycarpum. Am J Bot 60:944–949View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitazawa D, Hatakeda Y, Kamada M, Fuiji N, Miyazawa Y, Hoshino A, Iida S, Fukaki H, Morita MT, Tasaka M, Suge H, Takahashi H (2005) Shoot circumnutation and winding movements require gravisensing cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18742–18747ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosuge K, Iida S, Katou K, Mimura T (2013) Circumnutation on the water surface: female flowers of Vallisneria. Sci Rep 3:1133ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Krishna H, Alizadeh M, Singh D, Singh U, Chauhan N, Eftekhari M, Sadh RK (2016) Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech 6:54View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Les DH, Moody ML, Jacobs SWL (2005) Phylogeny and systematics of Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae): the Australian species. Syst Bot 30:503–519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lusa MG, Boeger MRT, Moço MCC, Bona C (2011) Morpho-anatomical adaptations of Potamogeton polygonus (Potamogetonaceae) to lotic and lentic environments. Rodriguésia 62:927–936View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lye KA (1989) Aponogetonaceae. In: Polhill RM (ed) Flora of tropical East Africa. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 1Google Scholar
  27. Maricle BR, Lee RW (2002) Aerenchyma development and oxygen transport in the estuarine cordgrasses Spartina alterniflora and S. anglica. Aquat Bot 74:109–120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Munasinghe JU, Dilhan MAAB, Sundarabarathy TV (2010) Utilization of aquatic plants: a method to enhance the productivity of water in seasonal tanks in the Anuradhapura district. In: Weligamage P, Godaliyadda GGA, Jinapala K (eds) Proceedings of the national conference on water, food security and climate change in Sri Lanka, BMICH, Colombo, June 9–11, 2009, vol 1. Irrigation for food security, 2010. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, pp 23–32Google Scholar
  29. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Oh MJ, Na HR, Choi HK, Liu JR, Kim SW (2008) High frequency plant regeneration from zygotic-embryo-derived embryogenic cell suspension cultures of watershield (Brasenia schreberi). Plant Biotechnol Rep 2:87–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pemberton RW (2000) Waterblommetjie (Aponogeton distachyos, Aponogetonaceae), a recently domesticated aquatic food crop in Cape South Africa with unusual origins. Econ Bot 54:144–149View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Raghu AV, Geetha SP, Martin G, Balachandran I, Ravindran PN (2006) In vitro clonal propagation through mature nodes of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Hook. F. & Thoms.: an important ayurvedic medicinal plant. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 42:584–588View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG (2015) Indirect organogenesis and assessment of somaclonal variation in plantlets of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 123:657–664View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rascio N (2002) The underwater life of secondarily aquatic plants: some problems and solutions. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:401–427View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Raven JA, Osborne BA, Johnston AM (1985) Uptake of CO2 by aquatic vegetation. Plant Cell Environ 8:417–425View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Razdan M (2003) Introduction to plant tissue culture, 2nd edn. Science, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson P (2011) Gardening with rock & water. Hermes House, LeicestershireGoogle Scholar
  38. Shankar LH, Mishra PK (2012) Study of aquatic medicinal plants of Hazaribag district of Jharkhand, India. Int Res J Pharm 3:405–409Google Scholar
  39. Sivanesan I, Jeong BR (2007) Direct shoot regeneration from nodal explants of Sida cordifolia Linn. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:436–441View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Snow LM (1914) Contributions to the knowledge of the diaphragms of water plants. I. Scirpus validus. Bot Gaz 58:495–517View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Soukup A, Votrubová O, Čížková H (2000) Internal segmentation of rhizomes of Phragmites australis: protection of the internal aeration system against being flooded. New Phytol 145:71–75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Stanly C, Bhatt A, Chan LK (2011) An efficient in vitro plantlet regeneration of Cryptocoryne wendtii and Cryptocoryne becketii through shoot tip culture. Acta Physiol Plant 33:619–624View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Stant MY (1964) Anatomy of the Alismataceae. J Linn Soc Bot 59:1–42View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Stolarz M (2009) Circumnutation as a visible plant action and reaction. Plant Signal Behav 4:380–387View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Stolarz M, Żuk M, Król E, Dziubińska H (2014) Circumnutation Tracker: novel software for investigation of circumnutation. Plant Methods 10:24View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun SL, Zhong JQ, Li SH, Wang XJ (2013) Tissue culture-induced somaclonal variation of decreased pollen viability in torenia (Torenia fournieri Lind.). Bot Stud 54:36View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Swartz HJ (1991) Post culture behaviour: genetic and epigenetic effects and related problems. In: Debergh PC, Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: technology and application. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 95–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Sweeney ME (2008) The 101 best aquarium plants: how to choose and keep hardy, vibrant, eye-catching species that will thrive in your home aquarium (adventurous aquarist guide). TFH, Neptune CityGoogle Scholar
  49. Tariq U, Ali M, Abbasi BH (2014) Morphogenic and biochemical variations under different spectral lights in callus cultures of Artemisia absinthium L. J Photochem Photobiol B 130:264–271View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Thabrew WV (2014) A manual of water plants. Author House, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. Traw MB, Bergelson J (2003) Interactive effects of jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellin on induction of trichomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 133:1367–1375View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Trojak-Goluch A, Kawka M, Czarnecka D (2015) The effects of explant source and hormone content on plant regeneration and induction of tetraploids in Humulus lupulus L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 51:152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. van Bruggen HWE (1998) Aponogetonaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) Flowering plants monocotyledons: Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wangwibulkit M, Vajrodaya S (2016) Ex-situ propagation of Pogostemon helferi (Hook. f.) press using tissue culture and a hydroponic system. Agric Nat Resour 50:20–25Google Scholar
  55. Xu L, Najeeb U, Razluddin R, Shen WQ, Shou JY, Tang GX, Zhou WJ (2009) Development of an efficient tissue culture protocol for callus formation and plant regeneration of wetland species Juncus effusus L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45:610–618View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Yemets AI, Klimkina LAA, Tarassenko LV, Blume YB (2003) Efficient callus formation and plant regeneration of goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Plant Cell Rep 21:503–510PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Yepes LM, Aldwinekle HS (1994) Factors that affect leaf regeneration efficiency in apple, and effect of antibiotics in morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 37:257–269Google Scholar
  58. Yildiz M (2012) The prerequisite of the success in plant tissue culture: high frequency shoot regeneration. In: Leva A, Rinaldi LMR (eds) Recent advances in plant in vitro culture. Intech, Rijeka, pp 63–90Google Scholar
  59. Zhao D, Xing J, Li M, Lu D, Zhao Q (2001) Optimization of growth and jaceosidin production in callus and cell suspension cultures of Saussurea medusa. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 67:227–234View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou C, An S, Jiang J, Yin D, Wang Z, Fang C, Sun Z, Qian C (2006) An in vitro propagation protocol of two submerged macrophytes for lake revegetation in east China. Aquat Bot 85:44–52View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Zoriniants SE, Nosov AV, Gonzalez MM, Zeel MM, Vargas VML (2003) Variation of nuclear DNA content during somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Coffea arabica L. using cytophotometry. Plant Sci 164:141–146View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement