Open Access

Changing the thickness of two layers: i-ZnO nanorods, p-Cu2O and its influence on the carriers transport mechanism of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction

  • Nguyen Huu Ke1Email author,
  • Le Thi Tuyet Trinh1,
  • Pham Kim Phung1,
  • Phan Thi Kieu Loan1,
  • Dao Anh Tuan1,
  • Nguyen Huu Truong2,
  • Cao Vinh Tran2 and
  • Le Vu Tuan Hung1
SpringerPlus20165:710

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2468-y

Received: 3 November 2015

Accepted: 29 May 2016

Published: 13 June 2016

Abstract

In this study, two layers: i-ZnO nanorods and p-Cu2O were fabricated by electrochemical deposition. The fabricating process was the initial formation of ZnO nanorods layer on the n-IGZO thin film which was prepared by sputtering method, then a p-Cu2O layer was deposited on top of rods to form the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-ZnO heterojunction. The XRD, SEM, UV–VIS, I–V characteristics methods were used to define structure, optical and electrical properties of these heterojunction layers. The fabricating conditions and thickness of the Cu2O layers significantly affected to the formation, microstructure, electrical and optical properties of the junction. The length of i-ZnO nanorods layer in the structure of the heterojunction has strongly affected to the carriers transport mechanism and performance of this heterojunction.

Keywords

Electrochemical method ZnO nanorods Heterojunction Cu2O layer Solar cells

Background

Renewable energy is expected to replace depleting fossil energy sources in order to ensure energy security and overcome the problem of global climate change. Currently, when the demand for energy is increasing, the manufacture of cheap and durable solar cells is an essential requirement. As opposed to the high cost of single crystal silicon, the metal oxide semiconductors are suitable options for solar cells fabrication because of the diversity and simplicity in manufacturing of them (Abdu and Musa 2009). The metal oxide semiconductors prepared by thin film technology can save material and production costs. In addition, the structure of these semiconductors can be easily adjusted. Therefore, the suitable electrical and optical properties are easily obtained for forming the optoelectronic devices based on heterojunctions (Chen 2013).

Among the oxide semiconductors, zinc oxide (ZnO) and cuprous oxide (Cu2O) are attractive of many scientists because they have favorable photoelectric properties and economic values, such as suitable bandgap, good thermal stability, low-cost and environment-friendly material (Wang et al. 2011). ZnO is an n-type semiconductor with a direct bandgap. The bandgap energy of ZnO is about 3.37 eV corresponding to exciton bounding energy of 60 meV. The improving in optical and electronic properties of ZnO by doping metal atoms such as Ga, In, Al etc. made it specially suitable for n-type electrode materials of solar cells because of the high transmittance in the visible wavelength region and high electron concentration (Kidowaki et al. 2012). Especially, the 1D ZnO nanostructures that have the larger surface area and high electron mobility are promising in enhancing the ability to the separation and transmission of carriers (Baek et al. 2013). However, there are many difficult problems in preparing of the p-type ZnO semiconductor that lead to unstable electrical capacity. Therefore, it is difficult to get homojunction based on n-type and p-type of ZnO (Gershon et al. 2013). As noted above, the p-type ZnO layer need to be replaced by another semiconductor. Among metal oxide semiconductors, Cu2O shows up as a bright candidate. Naturally, Cu2O is a p-type semiconductor due to the present of Cu+ vacancy in crystalline structure. Its potential for solar cells was revived during the mid-seventies as a possible low-cost material (De Jongh et al. 1999). The bandgap of Cu2O semiconductor is about 2.17 eV and this kind of semiconductor has absorption edge in visible range. The absorption coefficient of Cu2O is higher than single crystalline Si therefore it has been considered as a potential material for the light absorbing layer in solar cells (Zoolfakar et al. 2012).

Base on Shockley–Queisser theory, the power conversion efficiency is about 20 % could be obtained from the thin film solar cell made of n-type ZnO and p-type Cu2O heterojunction (Cheng et al. 2013). In such heterojunction cells, the Cu2O layers are generally prepared by many physical and chemical techniques such as thermal oxidation of metallic Cu sheet, DC and RF sputtering, pulse laser deposition, photochemical deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and electrochemical deposition. Among them, the electrochemical deposition method has several advantages such as low cost, saving material, simple fabrication, and easy application (Jeong et al. 2008). However, results from many reports have showed that the conversion efficiency of ZnO/Cu2O heterojunction prepared by electrochemical method was still low in range 0.007–0.2 % because of two main reasons: the quality of crystal structure affected the electrical conductivity and absorption capacity of the Cu2O layer, and the defects at interface between two layers trapped carriers and produced a tunnel recombination process (Lv et al. 2013).

In present work, a ZnO nanorods layer was deposited in the middle of two layers: n-IGZO and p-Cu2O to investigate the carriers transport mechanisms and performance of the junction. The ZnO nanorods layer was also prepared by electrochemical deposition. This layer worked as intrinsic layer and had effective contributions in separate, transport mechanisms of carriers.

Methods

First, Indium–Gallium–Zinc Oxide (IGZO) thin films with sheet resistance of 10 Ω/square and Pt foil were used as a working electrode and a counter electrode, respectively. IGZO thin films, sputtered from the ceramic targets, were deposited on glass substrates (Marienfeld, Germany) using DC magnetron sputtering. The films were deposited in pure Ar gas plasma with a sputtering pressure of 0.4 Pa and power density of 1.32 W/cm2. The substrate temperature 300 °C and the target-substrate distance 5 cm are constant during deposition (Pham et al. 2014). The electrical properties IGZO thin films, including carrier concentration, mobility, and resistivity are corresponding to 8 × 1020 cm−3, 25 cm2/V s and 7.5 × 10−4 Ω cm (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction

Second, the i-ZnO nanorods layer was grown on IGZO substrates by using the electrochemical deposition. The electrolyte was prepared by adding of 0.05 M Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.05 M C6H12N4. This solution in electrolytic tank was heated to a temperature of 80 °C. In the solution, there were many happened processes, first Zn(NO3)2 was dissociated to form two Zn2+ and NO3 ions then NO3 ions combined with water in solution and two electrons to form two ions: NO2 and OH. Besides, C6H12N4 decomposed into NH3 and HCHO. The NH3 reacted with water to produce NH4+ and OH. Through two process, OH ions were continuously provided for the formation of Zn(OH)2 which subsequently formed ZnO. The ZnO nanorods layer was electrodeposited at 80 °C for 60 min. After that, the sample was rinsed with distilled water and transferred in the Cu2O electrodeposition bath. The Cu2O layer was prepared in solution of Copper (II) sulfate (CuSO4, 0.02 mol L−1) and Lactic acid (4 mol L−1). The pH of the electrochemical solution was adjusted to 11 by adding NaOH. The electrolyte temperature was kept at 70 °C during electrochemical process. The current density at 0.1 and 0.15 mA cm−2 for two steps were set up to growth of Cu2O crystals. In step 1, the seed layer was prepared according to current density of 0.1 mA cm−2 in order to make the bonding ability between Cu2O seeds and ZnO nanorods. After that, the thickness of Cu2O was grown by step 2 and the sample thickness could be adjusted by the change of deposition time (Jeong et al. 2013). The silver paste was used as a back contact of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction.

The morphology and size of the product were analyzed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns to determine the crystalline structure of the samples were obtained by using a D8 ADVANCE-BRUKER system with Cu Kα primary X-rays. The optical spectra were recorded by using UV–Vis Jasco V-530 in the wavelength range of 200 to 1100 nm. The Keithley K2612A source and Agilent 4294 Precision Impedance Analyser were used to measure the electrical properties of the heterojunction. The photoelectric properties were performed by using a solar simulator (XES-40S1, San-Ei) equipped with AM 1.5 G filters used at 100 mW/cm2. The solar cells were illuminated through the side of the IGZO substrate, and the illuminated area was 0.25 cm2.

Results and discussion

Morphology and crystal structure

The SEM images of three distinct layers in the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction were shown in Fig. 2. The ZnO nanorods were growth on IGZO substrate with vertical direction. The single nanorod is about 1.5 μm in length. The top of nanorods has a hexagonal morphology with a diameter of approximately 100 nm. The rod-to-rod space is around 300–500 nm according to Fig. 2b. An absorber layer of Cu2O was evenly deposited on the surface of the ZnO nanorods by electrochemical method. Figure 2c, d have shown that the Cu2O layer was full fill into space of rods. The length of ZnO nanorods was changed in range 1–2 μm when depositing time of these rods was increased from 2000 to 4000 s. The thickness of Cu2O layer was also improved to 5 μm clearly when the growth-time of Cu2O layer in the bath was adjusted from 2 to 6 h as Fig. 2e.
Fig. 2

SEM images of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction. a ZnO nanorods on IGZO substrate. b Top-view of ZnO nanorods. c The cross-section image of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO with growth-time of ZnO nanorods is 2000 s. d The cross-section image of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO with growth-time of ZnO nanorods is 4000 s. e The cross-section image of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO with growth-time of Cu2O is increased to 6 h. f Top-view of Cu2O surface

The top-view of Cu2O surface revealed the fact that the cubic crystalline structure of Cu2O was obtained from electrochemical method. The size of Cu2O crystal is about 1–2 μm and no ZnO nanorod is observed on the surface have proved the well-contact between two layers: ZnO nanorods and Cu2O. In confirmation, uniformly distinctive hexagonal morphologies with clear boundaries observed in the SEM images will lead to decreasing of defects at interface and improving charge collection efficiency of heterojunction (Baek et al. 2013).

Figure 3 has shown the XRD patterns of both structures: the ZnO nanorods on IGZO substrate and the Cu2O/ZnO nanorods/IGZO.
Fig. 3

XRD patterns of the ZnO nanorods on IGZO glass and the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction

In the case of the ZnO nanorods on IGZO substrate, the high intensity peak at 2θ = 34.3o revealed the fact that ZnO nanorods have wurtzite structure and orientation of (002) plane. When a Cu2O layer was deposited on top of ZnO nanorods, the intensity of ZnO (002) peak was also decreased clearly due to the Cu2O layer on the ZnO nanorods. The effect of IGZO substrate and ZnO nanorods layer was so strong that no peak of Cu2O structure was observed clearly. However, the XRD pattern of Cu2O/ZnO nanorods/IGZO heterojunction in range of 2θ from 35° to 60° has revealed cubic structure of Cu2O at (111) and (200) planes according to 2θ = 36.45° and 42.35° (Jeong et al. 2013). The weak peak at Cu2O (111) orientation compared with the strong ZnO (002) peak has indicated that the seeds layer of Cu2O was formed on the surface of ZnO nanorods and small crystals of Cu2O were randomly distributed on interface of heterojunction (Perng et al. 2013). This lead to some advances in carriers transport capability of solar cell based on the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction.

Optical properties

The absorption spectra of two structures: IGZO/ZnOnanorods and IGZO/ZnO nanorods/Cu2O are presented in Fig. 4a. The optical absorption peak at 370 nm is due to contribution of ZnO crystal phase including IGZO substrate and ZnO nanorods, and a peak at 470–500 nm corresponds to the Cu2O absorption layer (Noda et al. 2013). Clearly, when the Cu2O was deposited on the top of ZnO nanorods layer, the absorption peak was enhanced obviously. Especially, the absorption range of the IGZO/ZnO nanorods/Cu2O heterojunction was expanded from 400 to 800 nm because of the high absorption coefficient in the visible range of the Cu2O layer (Oku et al. 2014). For determination of the bandgap energy (Eg) of ZnO and Cu2O in the heterostructure, the method based on the relation of αhυ = A(hυ − Eg)n/2 was used. Where n is a number that depends on the nature of the transition (Noda et al. 2013). In this case, the value of n was found to be 1 because of the direct band to band transition happening in ZnO and Cu2O semiconductors. Figure 4b is a Tauc plot, which shows (αhν)2 versus hν for the sample. The intersection of the straight line with the hν-axis determines the optical band gap energy Eg. The band gap of ZnO and Cu2O layers were found to be 3.2 and 2.0 eV corresponding. These values are suitable to the ideal band gap of the ZnO and Cu2O crystals (Lv et al. 2015).
Fig. 4

a Absorption spectra and b Tauc plots of the ZnO nanorods on IGZO glass and the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction

Electrical properties

Figure 5 presents the dark I–V characteristics of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnOnanorods/n-IGZO heterojunctions. The I–V characteristics of p–i–n heterojunctions exhibit a significant diode behavior. It indicates the fact that a potential barrier is formed in our heterojunction as Fig. 5a. With the forward bias, the carrier current passing barrier of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO structure is higher than the p-Cu2O/n-IGZO structure. Keeping stable deposition time of Cu2O layer in 2, 4, 6 h and changing the length of ZnO nanorods by increasing growth-time of rods from 2000 to 4000 s is presented in Fig. 5b–d. In the case of thinner Cu2O layers as Figs. 2c and 5b, the heterojunction with long ZnO nanorods get higher conductivity in forward bias. This is attributed to the contribution of large surface area of ZnO nanorods at interface which effectively increases the carriers transport capability (Chen et al. 2015). However, the leakage current is also increased in the reverse bias indicated the fact that many defects in ZnO nanorods such as vacancy, interstices and defects on the surface have worked as recombination centers (Perng et al. 2013). In the case of thicker Cu2O layers as Figs. 2e and 5c, d, the i-ZnO nanorods layer plays an important role as buffer layer between IGZO and Cu2O. In this case, the threshold voltage increases with increasing i-ZnO layer thickness that may be attributed to the increasing of potential barrier caused by balance of Fermi level in high crystalline ZnO, Cu2O structures. Moreover, the forward currents decreases because electrons meet more resistance when they pass through i-ZnO thicker layer.
Fig. 5

The dark I–V characteristic curves of: a Cu2O/IGZO and Cu2O/ZnO nanorods/IGZO structures. b Different growth-time of ZnO nanorod; 2000 and 4000 s with the same growth-time of Cu2O; 2 h. c Different growth-time of ZnO nanorod; 2000 and 4000 s with the same growth-time of Cu2O; 4 h. d Different growth-time of ZnO nanorod; 2000 and 4000 s with the same growth-time of Cu2O 6 h

The carriers transport mechanisms and performance of the junction were deeply considered by the illuminated J–V characteristic curves shown on Fig. 6. Both structures of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction were prepared with same deposition time of ZnO nanorods at 2000 s and changing deposition time of Cu2O layers for 2 and 6 h. Clearly, increasing in thickness of Cu2O lead to the increasing of open circuit-voltage from 0.14 to 0.41 V and decreasing of short circuit-current density from 0.47 to 0.21 mA/cm2. This indicated that the effecting of large surface area and one-direction conductivity of ZnO nanorods is only meaningful to thinner Cu2O layers (Fig. 2c). In this case, pair of hole-electron generated from absorption layer will be separated quickly to the contacts. However, the thinner Cu2O layer (Fig. 2c) effects to optical absorption capability and diffusion length of hole in IGZO layer, electron in Cu2O layer. Therefore, the current density is still low for both situations. Another reason is that the thinner Cu2O layer (Fig. 2c) leads to weak crystallinity of Cu2O and then reduces barrier potential at interface (Lv et al. 2013). This is observed obviously with the increasing of open circuit-voltage via increasing the depth of Cu2O layer. Generally, ZnO nanorods layers have contributed to carriers-collection and carriers-separation capability of heterojunction. Adjusting the length of ZnO nanorods, the thickness of Cu2O combined with improving defects in rods and on surface of rods are necessary to improve conversion efficiency of the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction.
Fig. 6

The J–V characteristic curves of Cu2O/ZnO-nanorods/IGZO structures in situations of different growth-time of Cu2O; 2 and 6 h with the same growth-time of ZnO nanorods; 2000 s

Conclusion

In this work, the p-Cu2O/i-ZnO nanorods/n-IGZO heterojunction was fabricated by electrochemical, sputtering method. The ZnO nanorods layer was deposited between two layers: n-IGZO and p-Cu2O to investigate the carrier transport mechanisms and performance of the junction. The clear boundaries were observed between two layers. The absorption range of the IGZO/ZnO nanorods/Cu2O heterojunction was expanded from 400 to 800 nm because of the high absorption coefficient in the visible range of the Cu2O layer. It is found that the length ZnO nanorods layer has contributed to carriers-collection and carriers-separation capability of heterojunction.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

LVTH leads the research group. NHK analyzed the results and wrote this manuscript, LTTT, PKP, PTKL did experiments and calculations. DAT, NHT, CVT discussed and supplied IGZO thin films. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Lam Nguyen for his constructive suggestions.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Science, VNU-HCM
(2)
Laboratory of Advanced Materials, University of Science, VNU-HCM

References

  1. Abdu Y, Musa A (2009) Copper (I) oxide (Cu2O) based solar cells-a review. Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 2(2):8–12Google Scholar
  2. Baek SK et al (2013) Oxide pn heterojunction of Cu2O/ZnO nanowires and their photovoltaic performance. J Nanomater 2013(2514103):6Google Scholar
  3. Chen L-C (2013) Review of preparation and optoelectronic characteristics of Cu2O-based solar cells with nanostructure. Mater Sci Semicond Process 16(5):1172–1185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X et al (2015) Three-dimensional ordered ZnO/Cu2O nanoheterojunctions for efficient metal-oxide solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(5):3216–3223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng K et al (2013) Interface engineering for efficient charge collection in Cu2O/ZnO heterojunction solar cells with ordered ZnO cavity-like nanopatterns. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 116:120–125View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. De Jongh P et al (1999) Cu2O: electrodeposition and characterization. Chem Mater 11(12):3512–3517View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gershon TS et al (2013) Improved fill factors in solution-processed ZnO/Cu2O photovoltaics. Thin Solid Films 536:280–285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeong S et al (2008) Electrodeposited ZnO/Cu2O heterojunction solar cells. Electrochim Acta 53(5):2226–2231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeong YS et al (2013) Growth and characterization of p-Cu2O/n-ZnO nanorod heterojunctions prepared by a two-step potentiostatic method. J Alloys Compd 573:163–169View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kidowaki H et al (2012) Fabrication and characterization of CuO/ZnO solar cells. J Phys Conf Ser 352:012022. http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/352/1/012022 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lv P et al (2013) Photosensitivity of ZnO/Cu2O thin film heterojunction. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 124(17):2654–2657View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lv J et al (2015) Effect of seed layer on optical properties and visible photoresponse of ZnO/Cu2O composite thin films. Ceram Int 41(10):13983–13987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Noda S et al (2013) Cu2O/ZnO heterojunction solar cells fabricated by magnetron-sputter deposition method films using sintered ceramics targets. J Phys Conf Ser 433:012027. http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/433/1/012027 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Oku T et al (2014) Microstructures and photovoltaic properties of Zn (Al) O/Cu2O-based solar cells prepared by spin-coating and electrodeposition. Coatings 4(2):203–213View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Perng D-C et al (2013) Cu2O growth characteristics on an array of ZnO nanorods for the nano-structured solar cells. Surf Coat Technol 231:261–266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pham DP et al (2014) In and Ga codoped ZnO film as a front electrode for thin film silicon solar cells. Adv Condens Matter Phys 2014:971528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/971528 Google Scholar
  17. Wang X et al (2011) Nanostructured Al–ZnO/CdSe/Cu2O ETA solar cells on Al–ZnO film/quartz glass templates. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):1–5Google Scholar
  18. Zoolfakar AS et al (2012) Enhancing the current density of electrodeposited ZnO–Cu2O solar cells by engineering their heterointerfaces. J Mater Chem 22(40):21767–21775View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016