Open Access

Effects of dietary lysine levels on plasma free amino acid profile in late-stage finishing pigs

  • Naresh Regmi1,
  • Taiji Wang1,
  • Mark A. Crenshaw1,
  • Brian J. Rude1,
  • Guoyao Wu2 and
  • Shengfa F. Liao1Email author
SpringerPlus20165:888

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2463-3

Received: 12 February 2016

Accepted: 29 May 2016

Published: 24 June 2016

Abstract

Muscle growth requires a constant supply of amino acids (AAs) from the blood. Therefore, plasma AA profile is a critical factor for maximizing the growth performance of animals, including pigs. This research was conducted to study how dietary lysine intake affects plasma AA profile in pigs at the late production stage. Eighteen crossbred (Large White × Landrace) finishing pigs (nine barrows and nine gilts; initial BW 92.3 ± 6.9 kg) were individually penned in an environment controlled barn. Pigs were assigned randomly to one of the three dietary treatments according to a randomized complete block design with sex as block and pig as experiment unit (6 pigs/treatment). Three corn- and soybean meal-based diets contained 0.43 % (lysine-deficient, Diet I), 0.71 % (lysine-adequate, Diet II), and 0.98 % (lysine-excess, Diet III) l-lysine, respectively. After a 4-week period of feeding, jugular vein blood samples were collected from the pigs and plasma was obtained for AA analysis using established HPLC methods. The change of plasma lysine concentration followed the same pattern as that of dietary lysine supply. The plasma concentrations of threonine, histidine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, valine, arginine, and citrulline of pigs fed Diet II or III were lower (P < 0.05) than that of pigs fed Diet I. The plasma concentrations of alanine, glutamate, and glycine of pigs fed Diet II or III were higher (P < 0.05) than that of pigs fed Diet I. The change of plasma leucine and asparagine concentrations followed the patterns similar to that of plasma lysine. Among those affected AAs, arginine was decreased (P < 0.05) in the greatest proportion with the lysine-excess diet. We suggest that the skeletal muscle growth of finishing pigs may be further increased with a lysine-excess diet if the plasma concentration of arginine can be increased through dietary supplementation or other practical nutritional management strategies.

Keywords

LysineDietary lysine supplyAmino acid profilePlasmaSwineArginine

Background

The primary goal of animal agriculture (e.g., the swine industry) is to grow skeletal muscle (the major component of the body) and, thus, to produce meat with high-quality protein for human consumption (Wu et al. 2014a, b). Previous research has shown that growth and development of muscle essentially requires dietary supply of all proteinogenic amino acids (AAs) (Wu et al. 2014c). There are 20 different proteinogenic AAs in the diets that are commonly fed to pigs. The main function of these AAs is to serve as building blocks for biosynthesis of animal body proteins, such as muscle proteins that are the largest AA reservoir in the body (Hou et al. 2015). Like many other body proteins, muscle proteins undergo continuous turnover; namely old, damaged, or unneeded proteins are degraded and new proteins are de novo synthesized (Liao et al. 2015). Therefore, a constant supply of sufficient AAs to living cells from the blood is required to ensure protein accretion in skeletal muscle of growing pigs, i.e., the rate of protein biosynthesis is greater than the rate of protein degradation.

Protein is a polymer of AA residues joined together by peptide bonds. Each protein has a unique linear AA sequence and, thus, fixed ratios of different AAs (Wu 2013). For maximal protein biosynthesis in skeletal muscle, various free AAs must be available simultaneously in certain ratios that match muscle protein AA composition (Christensen 1964; Liao et al. 2015). Unbalanced ratios of AAs can diminish muscle protein biosynthesis, which means if one proteinogenic AA is deficient, protein synthesis will be reduced. This will result in the net degradation of muscle proteins to release AAs for use by other important organs, such as the brain, liver, small intestine, and lymphoid organs (Waterlow 1969; Gustafson et al. 1986; Wu 2014).

From nutrient metabolism standpoint, AAs are directly and indirectly related to each other within the overall metabolic pathways, and plasma free AA profile reflects the sum of metabolic flow of nutrients and their metabolites from all tissues and organs (Christensen 1964; Liao et al. 2015). In many physiological circumstances, tissue uptake of free AAs and further the metabolism of AAs largely depend on the concentrations of plasma free AAs (Cynober 2002). Thus, in pigs, plasma free AA profile, which can be readily monitored, may provide animal nutritionists with indication of AA metabolic status, a key index of body protein turnover. Because plasma free AAs are principally the direct source of AA supply for muscle protein biosynthesis and plasma AA profile does not parallel dietary AA profile (Wu 2014), the knowledge of plasma AA profile may be more imperative than the knowledge of dietary AA profile to evaluate the adequacy of AAs for tissue protein biosynthesis.

Dietary AA deficiency is usually overcome either by increasing dietary crude protein intake or by adding crystalline AAs. Lysine is the first limiting AA in typical grain-based swine diets (Liao et al. 2015). It has been reported that a deficiency of dietary lysine can reduce the expression of AA transporters in the small intestine (He et al. 2013) and alter the plasma concentrations of AAs (Morrison et al. 1961; Yun et al. 1991; Zeng et al. 2013), leading to a series of interconnected consequences for swine health and productivity. Thus, there is a pressing need to further study the effect of dietary lysine on plasma AA profile in order to explore the metabolic interactions between lysine and other AAs and to identify an optimal plasma AA profile to maximize pig growth performance via the best combination and supply of dietary AAs. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effect of three critical levels of dietary lysine on plasma concentrations of free AAs in late-stage finishing pigs.

Methods

Animal trial procedures

Eighteen crossbred (Large White × Landrace) nursery pigs (nine barrows and nine gilts), with average body weight (BW) 20.5 ± 0.9 kg, were purchased from a local commercial swine farm and transferred to an environment controlled swine barn at the Leveck Animal Research Center of Mississippi State University. After arrival, pigs were phase-fed commercial nursery and grow-finish diets until their BW reached 92.3 ± 6.9 kg, during which period, pigs were allowed ad libitum access to feed and water. Pigs were then randomly assigned into 18 individual feeding pens, and further randomly assigned to three dietary treatment groups according to a randomized complete block experimental design with gender as block and pig as experimental unit (three barrows and three gilts per treatment).

A corn- and soybean meal-based diet (Diet I; a lysine-deficient diet) was formulated to meet or exceed the NRC (2012) recommended requirements (on a per-kg-diet basis for 100–135 kg BW pigs) of various nutrients including crude protein but not lysine. Diet II (a lysine-adequate diet) and Diet III (a lysine-excess diet) were formulated by adding l-lysine monohydrochloride (98.5 %; Archer Daniels Midland Co., Quincy, IL) to Diet I at the expense of corn at ratios of 0.35 and 0.70 %, respectively (Table 1). Calculated total lysine contents (as-fed basis) in Diets I, II, and III were 0.43, 0.71, and 0.98 %, respectively. No effort was made to maintain a constant amino acid balance. To confirm the contents of major nutrients, samples of the three diets were submitted to the Essig Animal Nutrition Laboratory at Mississippi State University for proximate analysis, and to Guoyao Wu’s laboratory at Texas A&M University for AA analysis (Dai et al. 2014). Shown in Table 2 are analyzed compositions of various nutrients in the three experimental diets.
Table 1

Composition of three corn- and soybean meal-based diets for the finishing pigs

Item

Experimental diet

Diet I

Diet II

Diet III

Ingredient (%)

Corn

90.844

90.494

90.144

Soybean meal

6.400

6.400

6.400

Canola oil

0.800

0.800

0.800

l-Lysine-HCla

0.000

0.350

0.700

dl-Methionineb

0.040

0.040

0.040

l-Threoninea

0.090

0.090

0.090

l-Tryptophanc

0.035

0.035

0.035

Limestone

0.650

0.650

0.650

Dicalcium phosphate

0.900

0.900

0.900

Salt

0.200

0.200

0.200

Mineral premixd

0.033

0.033

0.033

Vitamin premixe

0.008

0.008

0.008

Calculated energy and nutrient f

Dry matter (%)

90.0

90.0

90.0

Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)

3319

3323

3326

Net energy (kcal/kg)

2371

2375

2378

Crude protein (%)

10.45

10.75

11.0

SID lysine (%)

0.32

0.60

0.87

SID methionine + cysteine (%)

0.47

0.47

0.47

Total Ca (%)

0.46

0.46

0.46

Total P (%)

0.43

0.43

0.43

Available P (%)

0.26

0.26

0.26

As fed basis

SID standardized ileal digestible

a l-Lysine-HCl (98.5 %) and l-threonine (98.5 %) were donated by Archer Daniels Midland Co., Quincy, IL)

bDL-Methionine (99.0 %; Rhodimet, NP 99) was donated by Adisseo USA Inc. (Alpharetta, GA)

c l-Tryptophan (99.0 %) was donated by Ajinomoto Heartland, Inc. (Chicago, IL)

dSwine Trace Mineral Mix (No. 85) was donated by Prestage Farms of Mississippi, Inc. (West Point, MS) that contained 13.2 % Ca, 1.0 % Cu, 8.0 % Fe, 5.0 % Mn, 10.0 % Zn, 500 ppm I, and 300 ppm Se

eVitamin Premix for Market Swine was donated by Prestage Farms of Mississippi, Inc. (West Point, MS) that contained per kilogram 22.05 million IU vitamin A, 3.31 million IU vitamin D3, 66,138 IU vitamin E, 88 mg vitamin B12, 220 mg biotin, 8818 mg menadione, 15,432 mg riboflavin, 61,728 mg d-pantothenic acid, and 88,183 mg niacin

fOnly the selected major nutrients are listed

Table 2

Analyzed nutrient composition of the three corn- and soybean meal-based diets

Nutrient and energya

Experimental diet

Diet I

Diet II

Diet III

Dry matter (%)

87.10

87.10

87.10

Gross energy (kcal/kg)

3663

3608

3559

Crude protein (%)

9.77

10.60

10.86

Individual amino acids (%)

Lysine

0.42

0.70

1.01

Aspartate

0.98

0.97

0.98

Asparagine

0.74

0.75

0.75

Glutamate

1.01

1.03

1.03

Glutamine

1.42

1.44

1.43

Serine

0.53

0.52

0.54

Histidine

0.34

0.33

0.34

Glycine

0.61

0.62

0.62

Threonine

0.5

0.51

0.5

Arginine

0.73

0.74

0.74

Alanine

0.81

0.83

0.82

Tyrosine

0.52

0.52

0.53

Tryptophan

0.14

0.13

0.14

Methionine

0.25

0.25

0.26

Valine

0.65

0.66

0.65

Phenylalanine

0.66

0.65

0.66

Isoleucine

0.52

0.52

0.53

Leucine

1.42

1.44

1.45

Cysteine

0.26

0.26

0.3

Proline

1.08

1.07

1.09

aAmino acids were analyzed as described by Dai et al. (2014) in Guoyao Wu’s laboratory, Texas A&M University (College Station, TX), while energy, crude protein and dry matter were analyzed at the Essig Animal Nutrition Laboratory, Mississippi State University (Starkville, MS). All values are expressed on the as-fed basis

Pigs were allowed ad libitum access to the experimental diets and fresh water throughout the trial which lasted for a total of 4 weeks. All pigs, feeders, and waterers were checked 2–3 times daily. The BW of pigs were measured at the beginning and the end of the 4 week period for calculation of average daily gain (ADG). All experimental protocols involving caring, handling, and treatment of pigs were approved by Mississippi State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Sample collection and laboratory analyses

At the conclusion of the 4 week feeding trial, blood samples (approximately 10 mL/pig) were collected with vacutainer tubes containing anticoagulant (i.e., EDTA) by venipuncture of jugular veins of pigs between 06:00 and 08:00 am. Immediately before starting blood collection, all the leftover feeds were removed from all the feeders so that no pigs had access to the feed during the blood collection time. Thus, venous blood samples were obtained in a non-fasting state. Immediately after collection, blood samples were placed onto ice until plasma was separated by centrifugation for 16 min at 800 × g and 4 °C. Plasma samples were stored in 200-μL aliquots at −80 °C until the laboratory analyses of AAs were conducted.

Concentrations of plasma free AAs were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods (Wu 1993; Liao et al. 2005; Dai et al. 2014). Briefly, after a pre-column derivatization of plasma AAs with o-phthaldialdehyde, the samples were separated on a Supelco 3-μm reversed-phase C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, i.d.) guarded by a Supelco 40-μm reversed-phase C18 column (4.6 × 50 mm, i.d.). The HPLC mobile phase consisted of solvent A (0.1 M sodium acetate/0.5 % tetrahydrofuran/9 % methanol; pH 7.2) and solvent B (methanol), with a combined total flow rate of 1.1 mL/min. A gradient program with a total running time of 49 min was developed for satisfactory separation of AAs. Proline and cysteine were analyzed using two other different methods (Wu 1997; Wu and Meininger 2008).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC) for two-way ANOVA with gender (block) and dietary lysine level as two main effects and individual pigs as experiment units. Means were separated with PDIFF (adjust = T) option as preplanned. Probability values (P) less than 0.05 were considered as significant differences and P values between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered as tendencies to be different. Because there was no effects of block and the block × lysine level interaction detected, only the main effect of lysine level was presented for results.

Results

As shown in Table 3, there were no differences in the initial BW among the three treatment groups fed three different diets. At the end of the trial, the final BW of pigs fed Diet II or III were greater (P < 0.05) than that of pigs fed Diet I, and there was no difference in the final BW between pigs fed Diets II and III. The ADG changed in the same manner as that of final BW changed among the treatment groups. The ADG of pigs fed Diet II or III was greater (P < 0.05) than that of pigs fed Diet I, although there was no difference in the ADG between pigs fed Diets II and III.
Table 3

Effects of dietary lysine levels on body weight gain of the late-stage finishing pigs

Parameters1

Treatment group

SE2

P value3

Diet I

Diet II

Diet III

Initial BW (kg)

93.0

91.8

92.5

3.07

0.962

Final BW (kg)

120.8a

130.5b

130.6b

4.13

0.189

ADG4 (kg/day)

0.99a

1.38b

1.36b

0.06

0.004

1The total calculated lysine contents in Diets I, II, and III were 0.43, 0.71, and 0.98 % (as-fed basis), respectively

2SE = pooled standard error of mean (n = 6)

3 P value was obtained from the ANOVA F test

4ADG, average daily gain

a,bMeans within a row that do not share a same superscript differ (P < 0.05 or 0.01)

Plasma free AA profiles of pigs fed Diets I, II, and III are shown in Table 4. From this table, it can be seen that the concentration of glycine was the highest (917–1324 nmol/mL), whereas the concentration of aspartate was the lowest (17.0–18.3 nmol/mL) in the plasma of the pigs. While the total AA (TAA) concentration ranged from 4153 to 4668 nmol/mL, the concentration of total non-lysine essential AAs (EAA, excluding lysine) ranged from 841 to 1132 nmol/mL, and the total “nonessential AA” (NEAA) concentration ranged from 2930 to 3444 nmol/mL. While the plasma concentrations of 11 AAs, aspartate, β-alanine, cysteine, glutamine, methionine, ornithine, proline, serine, taurine, tryptophan, and tyrosine, were not affected, the plasma concentrations of 13 AAs, lysine, leucine, arginine, citrulline, histidine, threonine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, alanine, glutamate, glycine and asparagine, were affected (P < 0.05) by dietary treatment, and so were concentrations of total EAA, total NEAA, and TAA (Table 4).
Table 4

The concentrations of free amino acids in the plasma of finishing pigs fed three levels of dietary lysine1

Amino acids (nmol/mL)2

Treatment group

SE3

P value4

Diet I

Diet II

Diet III

Lysine

91.0a

317.6b

501.4c

42.5

<0.0001

Total EAA

1132.4b

861.6a

840.7a

44.5

0.0009

Leucine

179.4a

195.9a,b

200.1b

6.32

0.081

Histidine

124.1b

89.4a

88.3a

8.21

0.011

Phenylalanine

106.4b

56.6a

58.2a

11.3

0.010

Isoleucine

108.4b

77.1a

77.9a

5.32

0.001

Threonine

258.4b

149.7a

138.8a

11.2

<0.0001

Valine

209.1b

142.8a

144.6a

10.1

0.0004

Methionine

64.4

59.7

58.3

3.03

0.352

Tryptophan

82.1

90.2

74.6

6.12

0.231

Total NEAA

2929.5a

3444.0b

3325.5b

107.3

0.013

Arginine

228.1b

185.5a

159.6a

13.3

0.008

Citrulline

102.2b

76.3a

63.1a

6.69

0.003

Alanine

400.9a

509.1b

509.8b

31.9

0.045

Glutamate

89.5a

128.6b

106.0b

12.3

0.113

Glycine

917.4a

1324.0b

1308.4b

52.6

<0.0001

Asparagine

69.4a

78.3a

103.9b

7.98

0.021

Aspartate

17.0

18.1

18.3

1.87

0.869

β-Alanine

47.7

51.6

44.4

3.71

0.413

Cysteine, total5

193.8

203.3

199.8

4.72

0.385

Glutamine

459.4

466.5

420.8

17.3

0.166

Ornithine

110.2

93.8

108.0

8.00

0.319

Proline

286.2

290.2

284.0

5.57

0.734

Serine

190.5

235.1

233.0

24.0

0.358

Taurine

189.1

174.8

147.8

15.2

0.185

Tyrosine

108.2

102.5

102.5

4.57

0.611

Total AA

4152.9a

4623.2b

4667.6b

146.2

0.053

1Calculated total lysine contents (as-fed basis) in Diets I, II, and III were 0.43, 0.71, and 0.98 %, respectively

2EAA = essential amino acids excluding lysine, NEAA = “non-essential amino acids”, and total AA include lysine, total EAA, and total NEAA

3SE = pooled standard error of the mean, n = 6

4 P values were obtained from the ANOVA F test

5Total cysteine (cysteine + ½ cystine)

a,b,cMeans within a row that do not share a same superscript differ (P < 0.05)

As expected, the change of plasma lysine concentration followed the same pattern as that of dietary lysine supply. The plasma concentration of lysine in pigs fed Diet II was greater (P < 0.05) than that in pigs fed Diet I, and the plasma lysine concentration in pigs fed Diet III was greater (P < 0.05) than that in pigs fed Diet II (Table 4). The plasma concentration of leucine was not different between pigs fed Diets I and II or between pigs fed Diets II and III. However, pigs fed Diet III had a greater (P < 0.05) plasma concentration of leucine, compared with pigs fed Diet I.

The change of plasma concentrations of 5 EAA (histidine, threonine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and valine) as well as total EAA followed a different pattern than that of lysine or leucine. The plasma concentrations of these EAA in pigs fed Diet II or III were lower (P < 0.05) than those in pigs fed Diet I, and there were no differences between pigs fed Diets II and III. On the contrary, the plasma concentrations of 3 NEAA (alanine, glutamate, and glycine), as well as total NEAA, in pigs fed Diet II or III were greater (P < 0.05) when compared to pigs fed Diet I, with no difference being detected between pigs fed Diets II and III. However, the change of plasma concentrations of arginine and citrulline followed the same pattern as that of total EAA, but not that of total NEAA. There was no difference (P = 0.44) between pigs fed Diets I and II in the plasma concentration of asparagine, and the plasma concentration of asparagine in pigs fed Diet III was greater (P < 0.05) than that in pigs fed Diet I or II.

Although the plasma concentrations of 2 EAA (methionine and tryptophan) and 9 NEAA [aspartate, β-alanine, total cysteine (cysteine + ½ cystine), glutamine, ornithine, proline, serine, tyrosine and taurine] did not differ among the three groups of pigs (Table 4), the alteration in the plasma concentration of TAA followed the same pattern as that of total NEAA.

Discussion

Although dietary supply of proteins and AAs are the ultimate source of free AAs in the plasma of pigs, the free AAs are directly and indirectly related to each other within the overall nutrient metabolic pathways (Wu 2013). Importantly, the plasma free AA profile reflects the dynamic state of the metabolic flux of AAs absorbed from the small intestine, as well as the rates of their utilization and intracellular protein turnover in the whole body (Bongiovanni and Feinerman 2003; Shikata et al. 2007; Liao et al. 2015). Theoretically, dietary supply of lysine at different levels will affect not only the plasma concentration of lysine, but also the plasma concentrations of other AAs. However, the patterns of change in plasma concentrations of all free AAs have not been thoroughly studied in pigs. Results of the present study indicate five distinct patterns of change in the plasma concentrations of free AAs in the late-stage finishing pigs fed ad libitum during the experimental period.

As pattern 1, the plasma concentration of lysine increased as dietary lysine increased from a deficient to an adequate level, as well as from an adequate to an excess level. This pattern of change paralleled with the pattern of dietary lysine supply, indicating that the capacity of small-intestinal cationic AA transporters is not a limiting factor for absorption of dietary lysine within the range of dietary concentration of up to approximately 1.0 %. This result is similar to the findings of Braude et al. (1974), Roy et al. (2000), and Zeng et al. (2013) in growing pigs and Chen et al. (1978) in lactating sows. Lysine is known to be very conservative in terms of catabolism (Liao et al. 2015) and its oxidation rate is relatively slower compared to the oxidation rates of other EAA (Yang et al. 1968; Yamashita and Ashida 1969; Chu and Hegsted 1976; Blemings et al. 1989; Wu 2014). These characteristics of lysine metabolism may explain why the plasma concentration of lysine increased linearly with the increased concentrations of dietary lysine.

The second pattern of change was followed by 5 EAA, histidine, threonine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and valine, as well as total EAA (Table 4), which is in agreement with the findings of Zimmerman and Scott (1965) for chicks, who reported that dietary lysine deficiency resulted in increased plasma concentrations of several AAs, such as histidine, threonine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, and tyrosine in the birds. Roy et al. (2000) found that plasma concentrations of threonine, isoleucine, valine, and taurine were greater in growing barrows fed lysine deficient diets. This pattern of change firmly supports the limiting AA concept in swine nutrition, which states that if one EAA is deficient in a diet, body protein synthesis will not continue beyond the level of this EAA, which is lysine in the case of this study. When protein synthesis in the whole body (particularly, the skeletal muscle) is limited, the concentrations of EAA in the plasma of pigs would increase. When dietary level of lysine increased from deficient (as in Diet I) to adequate (as in Diet II) level, protein synthesis also increased until reaching the level of next limiting EAA, and this is why plasma concentrations of the aforementioned 5 EAA as well as total EAA were decreased in Diet II pigs, when compared with Diet I pigs. When the dietary level of lysine continued to increase from the adequate (as in Diet II) to the excess (as in Diet III) level, the plasma concentrations of these 5 EAA did not continue to decline, indicating that protein synthesis could not continue to increase in lysine-excess pigs possibly due to inadequate provision of a second limiting AA.

The change pattern of plasma arginine and citrulline concentrations also followed the second pattern of change as that of the aforementioned 5 EAA, which was reflected in the ADG change of these pigs. The ADG of pigs increased as dietary lysine increased from deficient to adequate level, but did not further increase as dietary lysine increased from the adequate to the excess level (Table 3). In theory, the ADG associated with lysine-excess diet could be further increased if greater concentrations of the 5 EAA and arginine in the plasma could be achieved. Among these AAs, it is currently not clear which one was the most limiting. Of note, arginine, a conditionally essential AA for pigs (Hou et al. 2015), was decreased in the greatest proportion and might be the first limiting AA for the pigs in the lysine-excess group.

In mammals, although arginine can be formed from citrulline by a variety of extra-hepatic cells via the arginine-citrulline cycle (Wu and Flynn 1993; Wu and Meininger 1993), citrulline and arginine in adult pigs are mainly synthesized from glutamine, glutamate and proline in enterocytes (Wu et al. 1994; Wu and Knabe 1995; Wu 1997). The citrulline released from the enterocytes can be taken up primarily by kidneys from blood for synthesis of arginine in post-weaning mammals, including pigs (Wu and Morris 1998). In mammals, arginine is catabolized via multiple pathways, with the production of urea and creatine being its major products (Hou et al. 2016a; Wu et al. 2016).

The negative relationship between lysine and arginine, however, has been studied in several animal species, and there are three contributing factors that may be responsible for this lysine-arginine antagonism: (1) the competitive inhibition of arginine absorption from intestinal lumen (Harper et al. 1970; Kamin and Handler 1952; Larsen et al. 1964), reabsorption from kidney tubules, and transport of basic AAs by other tissues (Jones et al. 1967; Nesheim 1968; Boorman 1971; Popolo et al. 2014; Monné et al. 2015); (2) the induction of kidney arginase (Austic and Nesheim 1970; Robbins and Baker 1981); (3) the inhibition of liver transaminase (Austic and Nesheim 1971); and (4) the changes in the synthesis of arginine metabolites such as nitric oxide, homoarginine, creatine, and polyamines (Hu et al. 2015; Kayacelebi et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2015), which are of enormous importance in cell nutrition and metabolism (Agostinelli 2014; Bernstein et al. 2015; Tan et al. 2015; Tsikas and Wu 2015; Wu et al. 2015).

In profiling AAs of muscle protein in finishing pigs, Cai et al. (2010) reported that arginine constitutes about 4.88 % of total protein of longissimus dorsi muscle. However, in our present study, we found that arginine represented 5.5, 4.01 and 3.42 % of total plasma free AAs in lysine-deficient, -adequate, and -excess diets, respectively. These ratios indicated that, in the lysine-excess group, the supply of arginine from the plasma to skeletal muscle might be a limiting factor for protein synthesis. Thus, increasing the plasma concentration of arginine, possibly through dietary arginine supply, may increase the response of pig muscle growth to dietary lysine supplementation. This strategy is promising, because dietary arginine enhances lean tissue growth and reduces whole-body white fat in growing-finishing pigs (Tan et al. 2009) and supplementing up to 2 % arginine to a typical corn- and soybean meal-based diet is safe for growing pigs (Hu et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2016).

The third pattern of change in plasma AA concentrations was followed by 3 NEAA (alanine, glutamate, and glycine) and total NEAA (Table 4). A possible reason for the decreased plasma concentrations of these 3 NEAA in the lysine-deficient group might be because of the reduced rates of their synthesis and/or the increased rates of their oxidation in a tissue-specific manner. In lysine-deficient pigs, the rate of muscle protein synthesis is limited so that there may be no need to have more NEAA as building blocks for protein synthesis. Because the de novo production of NEAA requires many different enzymes, synthesis of these proteins may be reduced by lysine deficiency, thereby decreasing the formation of alanine, glutamate and glycine in the body. This view supports the concept that both the availability of substrates and enzyme activity affect endogenous synthesis of NEAA in animals (Hou et al. 2016b). A balanced and adequate supply of AAs in a lysine-adequate diet may promote the synthesis of NEAA to optimize protein synthesis in skeletal muscle. Growing evidence shows that NEAA play important roles in maximizing feed efficiency and muscle growth in livestock species (including pigs) and poultry (Hou et al. 2016b; Rezaei et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2013, 2014, 2015; Wu et al. 2011a, b, 2013; Yi et al. 2015). Further increase in dietary lysine from the adequate to the excess level did not further increase plasma concentrations of these 3 NEAA (Table 4). Under lysine-excess conditions, although lysine was not a limiting AA, there might be a second limiting AA as noted previously that might limit the de novo synthesis of proteinogenic NEAA. These findings, however, are in disagreement with those of Roy et al. (2000), who did not observe any difference in plasma concentrations of the aforementioned 3 NEAA among three dietary lysine levels. Zeng et al. (2013) only observed a decrease in plasma glutamate concentration with a lysine deficient, but not a lysine excess, diet fed to growing pigs. Furthermore, the plasma concentrations of alanine and glycine were not affected by the level of dietary lysine in their study (Zeng et al. 2013). Reason for the discrepancies between the present study and those previous studies might be due to the differences in the age of the pigs used. Early-stage growing pigs (BW ranging from 20 to 40 kg) were used by Roy et al. (2000) and Zeng et al. (2013), whereas late-stage finishing pigs (BW ranging from 90 to 130 kg) were used in this study.

Although the plasma concentrations of 2 EAA (methionine and tryptophan) and 9 NEAA (aspartate, β-alanine, cysteine in total, glutamine, ornithine, proline, serine, tyrosine and taurine) did not change in response to different intakes of dietary lysine, the plasma concentrations of leucine and asparagine followed two different patterns of change. Pattern 4 was observed for leucine and pattern 5 was for asparagine (Table 4). Although both of these patterns had some similarity to pattern 1, why plasma concentrations of leucine and asparagine followed those two slightly different patterns is unknown. For plasma leucine concentration, there was no significant difference between the pigs fed Diets II and III, whereas for plasma asparagine concentration, there was a difference between the pigs fed Diets II and III.

Methionine and tryptophan are two EAA, but their plasma concentrations did not change as other EAA in pattern 2 as described previously. In the pigs fed Diet I, the relatively excess methionine might have been metabolized via transmethylation reactions, with its methyl group being transferred to pathways for choline and creatine synthesis in the body (Wu 2013), while the excessive amount of tryptophan might have been degraded via the kynurenine pathway to form kynurenine in the liver, intestine, and lymphoid organs (Wu 2013). Further studies, however, are required to test this hypothesis.

Conclusions

Results from the present study indicate that dietary levels of lysine can affect the plasma concentrations of 13 AAs (7 EAA and 6 NEAA) in late-stage finishing pigs in five distinct patterns. Plasma concentration of 7 AAs (threonine, histidine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, valine, arginine and citrulline) decreased with the lysine-adequate diet but not further decreased with the lysine-excess diet, when compared to the lysine-deficient diet. Among these AAs, arginine was decreased in the greatest proportion. We suggest that the skeletal muscle growth of late-stage finishing pigs may be further increased with a lysine-excess diet if the plasma concentrations of theses 7 AAs, primarily arginine, can be increased through dietary supplementation or other practical nutritional management strategies. Our findings underscore the importance of balanced and adequate provision of AAs in diets for optimizing lean-tissue growth in finishing pigs.

Abbreviations

AAs: 

amino acids

ADG: 

average daily gain

BW: 

body weight

EAA: 

essential amino acid(s), excluding lysine

EDTA: 

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

GLM: 

general linear model

HPLC: 

high-performance liquid chromatography

NEAA: 

nonessential amino acid(s)

NRC: 

National Research Council

PDIFF: 

P values for differences

SAS: 

statistical analysis system

T: 

T test

TAA: 

total amino acid(s)

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

NR and TW are graduate students who took responsibility for conducting this project under the guidance of MAC, BJR, and SFL who served as their graduate committee members. SFL served as their major professor. As a research collaborator, GW contributed to the experimental design of this study and amino acid analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon the work supported by a Hatch/Multistate Project (under No. 233803) funded through the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Authors wish to thank Mr. William White (farm manager, Leveck Animal Research Center, Mississippi State University) for his excellent assistance in facility and animal management. Donation of various feed ingredients for this study from several swine and feed companies, such as the Prestage Farms, Inc. (West Point, MS) and Ajinomoto Heartland, Inc. (Chicago, IL), is highly appreciated. The manuscript was approved for publication as a journal article by Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University
(2)
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University

References

  1. Agostinelli E (2014) Polyamines and transglutaminases: biological, clinical, and biotechnological perspectives. Amino Acids 46:475–485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Austic RE, Nesheim MC (1970) Role of kidney arginase in variations of the arginine requirement of chicks. J Nutr 100:855–867Google Scholar
  3. Austic RE, Nesheim MC (1971) Arginine ornithine and proline metabolism of chicks: influence of diet and heredity. J Nutr 101:1403–1414Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein HG, Jäger K, Dobrowolny H, Steiner J, Keilhoff G, Bogerts B, Laube G (2015) Possible sources and functions of l-homoarginine in the brain: review of the literature and own findings. Amino Acids 47:1729–1740View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Blemings KP, Benevenga NJ, Crenshaw TD, Swick RW (1989) Does the exclusive mitochrondrial location of lysine-α-ketoglutarate reductase in rat liver suggest transport control of lysine degradation? J Anim Sci 67(Suppl. 1):240–241 (Abstr.) Google Scholar
  6. Bongiovanni B, Feinerman J (2003) Amino acid profiling: clinical guidelines for determination of preferred specimen choice. Townsend Lett Dr Patients 245:38–42Google Scholar
  7. Boorman KN (1971) The renal reabsorption of arginine, lysine and ornithine in the young cockerel (Callus domesticas). Comp Biochem Physiol 39A:29–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Braude R, Fulford RJ, Mitchell KG, Myers AW, Porter JWG (1974) Performance and blood plasma amino acid and urea concentrations in growing pigs given diets of cereals and groundnut meal and supplemented with graded amounts of l-lysine. Livest Prod Sci 1:383–400View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai ZW, Zhao WF, Jiang XL, Yao YC, Zhao CJ, Xu NY, Wu CX (2010) Comparison of muscle amino acid and fatty acid composition of castrated and uncastrated male pigs at different slaughter ages. Ital J Anim Sci 9:173–178Google Scholar
  10. Chen SY, d’Melloa JPF, Elsley FWH, Taylor AG (1978) Effect of dietary lysine levels on performance, nitrogen metabolism and plasma amino acid concentrations of lactating sows. Anim Prod 27:331–344View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen HN (1964) Free amino acids and peptides in tissues. In: Munro HN, Allison JB (eds) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  12. Chu SHW, Hegsted DM (1976) Adaptive response of lysine and threonine degrading enzymes in adult rats. J Nutr 106:1089Google Scholar
  13. Cynober LA (2002) Plasma amino acid levels with a note on membrane transport: characteristics, regulation, and metabolic significance. Nutrition 18:761–766View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dai ZL, Wu ZL, Jia SC, Wu G (2014) Analysis of amino acid composition in proteins of animal tissues and foods as pre-column o-phthaldialdehyde derivatives by HPLC with fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B 964:116–127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustafson JM, Dodds SJ, Burgus RC, Mercer LP (1986) Prediction of brain and serum free amino acid profiles in rats fed graded levels of protein. J Nutr 116:1667–1681Google Scholar
  16. Harper AE, Benevenga NJ, Wohlhueter RM (1970) Effects of ingestion of disproportionate amounts of amino acids. Physiol Rev 50:428–558Google Scholar
  17. He LQ, Yang HS, Li TJ, Fang J, Zhou XH, Yin YL, Wu L, Nyachoti MN, Wu G (2013) Effects of dietary l-lysine intake on the intestinal mucosa and expression of CAT genes in weaned piglets. Amino Acids 45:383–391View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hou YQ, Yin YL, Wu G (2015) Dietary essentiality of “nutritionally nonessential amino acids” for animals and humans. Exp Biol Med 240:997–1007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hou YQ, Hu SD, Jia SC, Nawaratna G, Che DS, Wang FL, Bazer FW, Wu G (2016a) Whole-body synthesis of l-homoarginine in pigs and rats supplemented with l-arginine. Amino Acids 48:993–1001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou YQ, Yao K, Yin YL, Wu G (2016b) Endogenous synthesis of amino acids limits growth, lactation and reproduction of animals. Adv Nutr 7:331–342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu SD, Li XL, Rezaei R, Meininger CJ, McNeal CJ, Wu G (2015) Safety of long-term dietary supplementation with l-arginine in pigs. Amino Acids 47:925–936View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones JD, Petersburg SJ, Burnett PC (1967) The mechanism of the lysine-arginine antagonism in the chick: effect of lysine on digestion, kidney arginase, and liver transamidinase. J Nutr 93:103–116Google Scholar
  23. Kamin H, Handler P (1952) Effect of presence of other amino acids upon intestinal absorption of single amino acids in the rat. Am J Physiol 169:305–308Google Scholar
  24. Kayacelebi AA, Langen J, Weigt-Usinger K, Chobanyan-Jürgens K, Mariotti F, Schneider JY, Rothmann S, Frölich JC, Atzler D, Choe CU, Schwedhelm E, Huneau JF, Lücke T, Tsikas D (2015) Biosynthesis of homoarginine (hArg) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) from acutely and chronically administered free l-arginine in humans. Amino Acids 47:1893–1908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Larsen PR, Ross JE, Tapley DF (1964) Transport of neutral, dibasic and N-methyl-substituted amino acids by rat intestine. Biochim Biophys Acta 88:570–577Google Scholar
  26. Liao SF, Kies AK, Sauer WC, Zhang YC, Cervantes M, He JM (2005) Effect of phytase supplementation to a low- and a high-phytate diet for growing pigs on the digestibilities of crude protein, amino acids, and energy. J Anim Sci 83:2130–2136Google Scholar
  27. Liao SF, Wang T, Regmi N (2015) Lysine nutrition in swine and the related monogastric animals: muscle protein biosynthesis and beyond. SpringerPlus 4(1–12):147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Monné M, Miniero DV, Daddabbo L, Palmieri L, Porcelli V, Palmieri F (2015) Mitochondrial transporters for ornithine and related amino acids: a review. Amino Acids 47:1763–1777View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison AB, Middleton EJ, McLaughlan JM (1961) Blood amino acid studies: II. Effects of dietary lysine concentration, sex, and growth rate on plasma free lysine and threonine levels in the rat. Can J Biochem Physiol 39:1675–1680View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Nesheim MC (1968) Kidney arginase activity and lysine tolerance in strains of chickens selected for a high or low requirement of arginine. J Nutr 95:79–87Google Scholar
  31. NRC (2012) Nutritional requirements of swine. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Popolo A, Adesso S, Pinto A, Autore G, Marzocco S (2014) l-Arginine and its metabolites in kidney and cardiovascular disease. Amino Acids 46:2271–2286View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rezaei R, Knabe DA, Tekwe CD, Dahanayaka S, Ficken MD, Fielder SE, Eide SJ, Lovering SL, Wu G (2013) Dietary supplementation with monosodium glutamate is safe and improves growth performance in postweaning pigs. Amino Acids 44:911–923View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Robbins KR, Baker DH (1981) Kidney arginase activity in chicks fed diets containing deficient or excessive concentrations of lysine, arginine, histidine, or total nitrogen. Poult Sci 60:829–834View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy N, Lapierre H, Bernier JF (2000) Whole-body protein metabolism and plasma profiles of amino acids and hormones in growing barrows fed diets adequate or deficient in lysine. Can J Anim Sci 80:585–595View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shikata N, Maki Y, Noguchi Y, Mori M, Hanai T, Takahashi Okamoto M (2007) Multi-layered network structure of amino acid (AA) metabolism characterized by each essential AA-deficient condition. Amino Acids 33:13–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tan BE, Yin YL, Liu ZQ, Li XG, Xu HJ, Kong XF, Huang RL, Tang WJ, Shinzato I, Smith SB, Wu G (2009) Dietary l-arginine supplementation increases muscle gain and reduces body fat mass in growing-finishing pigs. Amino Acids 37:169–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan BE, Xiao H, Xiong X, Wang J, Li GR, Yin YL, Huang B, Hou YQ, Wu G (2015) l-Arginine improves DNA synthesis in LPS-challenged enterocytes. Front Biosci (Landmark) 20:989–1003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsikas D, Wu G (2015) Homoarginine, arginine, and relatives: analysis, metabolism, transport, physiology, and pathology. Amino Acids 47:1697–1702View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang WW, Wu ZL, Dai ZL, Yang Y, Wang JJ, Wu G (2013) Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids 45:463–477View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang WW, Dai ZL, Wu ZL, Lin G, Jia SC, Hu SD, Dahanayaka S, Wu G (2014) Glycine is a nutritionally essential amino acid for maximal growth of milk-fed young pigs. Amino Acids 46:2037–2045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang L, Hou YQ, Yi D, Li YT, Ding BY, Zhu HL, Liu J, Xiao H, Wu G (2015) Dietary supplementation with glutamate precursor alpha-ketoglutarate attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced liver injury in young pigs. Amino Acids 47:1309–1318View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Waterlow JC (1969) The assessment of protein nutrition and metabolism in the whole animal, with special reference to man. In: Munro HN, Allison JB (eds) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp 326–390Google Scholar
  44. Wu G (1993) Determination of proline by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with automated pre-column o-phthaldialdehyde derivatization. J Chromatogr 641:168–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu G (1997) Synthesis of citrulline and arginine from proline in enterocytes of postnatal pigs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 272:G1382–G1390Google Scholar
  46. Wu G (2013) Amino acids: biochemistry and nutrition. CRC Press, Boca RatonView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu G (2014) Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 5:34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu G, Flynn NE (1993) The activation of the arginine-citrulline cycle in macrophages from the spontaneously diabetic BB rat. Biochem J 294:113–118View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu G, Knabe DA (1995) Arginine synthesis in enterocytes of neonatal pigs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 269:R621–R629Google Scholar
  50. Wu G, Meininger CJ (1993) Regulation of l-arginine synthesis from l-citrulline by l-glutamine in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 265:H1965–H1971Google Scholar
  51. Wu G, Meininger CJ (2008) Analysis of citrulline, arginine, and methylarginines using high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol 440:177–189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu G, Morris SM (1998) Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem J 336:1–17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu G, Knabe DA, Flynn NE (1994) Synthesis of citrulline from glutamine in pig enterocytes. Biochem J 299:115–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu G, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Knabe DA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Li XL, Wang JJ (2011a) Important roles for l-glutamine in swine nutrition and production. J Anim Sci 89:2017–2030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu G, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Kim SW, Knabe DA, Li P, Li XL, McKnight JR, Satterfield MC, Spencer TE (2011b) Proline and hydroxyproline metabolism: implications for animal and human nutrition. Amino Acids 40:1053–1063View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu G, Bazer FW, Satterfield MC, Li XL, Wang XQ, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Dai ZL, Wang JJ, Wu ZL (2013) Impacts of arginine nutrition on embryonic and fetal development in mammals. Amino Acids 45:241–256View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu G, Fanzo J, Miller DD, Pingali P, Post M, Steiner JL, Thalacker-Mercer AE (2014a) Production and supply of high-quality food protein for human consumption: sustainability, challenges and innovations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1321:1–19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu G, Bazer FW, Cross HR (2014b) Land-based production of animal protein: impacts, efficiency, and sustainability. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1328:18–28View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu G, Bazer FW, Dai ZL, Li DF, Wang JJ, Wu ZL (2014c) Amino acid nutrition in animals: protein synthesis and beyond. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2:387–417View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu ZL, Hu CA, Wu G, Zhaorigetu S, Chand H, Sun KJ, Ji Y, Wang B, Dai ZL, Walton B, Miao YB, Hou YQ (2015) Intimacy and deadly feud: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis mediated by amino acids. Amino Acids 47:2089–2099View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Wu ZL, Hou YQ, Hu SD, Bazer FW, Meininger CJ, McNeal CJ, Wu G (2016) Catabolism and safety of supplemental l-arginine in animals. Amino Acids. doi:10.1007/s00726-016-2245-9 Google Scholar
  62. Yamashita K, Ashida K (1969) Lysine metabolism in rats fed lysine-free diet. J Nutr 99:267–273Google Scholar
  63. Yang SP, Tilton KS, Ryland LL (1968) Utilization of a delayed lysine or tryptophan supplement for protein repletion of rats. J Nutr 94:178–184Google Scholar
  64. Yang Y, Wu ZL, Jia SC, Dahanayaka S, Feng S, Meininger CJ, McNeal CJ, Wu G (2015) Safety of long-term dietary supplementation with l-arginine in rats. Amino Acids 47:1907–1920Google Scholar
  65. Yi D, Hou YQ, Wang L, Ouyang WJ, Long MH, Zhao D, Ding BY, Liu YL, Wu G (2015) L-glutamine enhances enterocyte growth via activation of the mTOR signaling pathway independently of AMPK. Amino Acids 47:65–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Yun CH, Han IK, Choi YJ, Park BC, Lee H (1991) Effects of lysine and sodium on the growth performance, bone parameter, serum composition and lysine-arginine antagonism in broiler chicks. Asian Austral J Anim 4:53–360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng PL, Yan HC, Wang XQ, Zhang CM, Zhu C, Shu G, Jiang QY (2013) Effects of dietary lysine levels on apparent nutrient digestibility and serum amino acid absorption mode in growing pigs. Asian Austral J Anim 26:1003–1011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Zimmerman RA, Scott HM (1965) Interrelationship of plasma amino acid levels and weight gain in chicks as influenced by suboptimal and super optimal dietary concentrations of single amino acids. J Nutr 87:13–18Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016