Open Access

Trace metals health risk appraisal in fish species of Arabian Sea

SpringerPlus20165:859

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2436-6

Received: 10 November 2015

Accepted: 27 May 2016

Published: 24 June 2016

Abstract

Fish is a vital food for humans and many animals. We report an environmental monitoring study to assess the trace metals in fish species caught from Arabian Sea and commercially available in the coastal city Karachi, Pakistan. Heavy metals such as copper, iron, lead and cadmium were determined in the skin, fillet and heart of the fish species Pampus argenteus, Epinephelus chlorostigma, Rachycentron canadum, Scomberomorus commerson, Johnius belangerii, Labeo rohita, Lutjanus argentimaculatus, Trachinotus blochii, Pomadsys olivaceum and Acanthopagrus berda by the atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The concentration (mg kg−1, dry weight) range was: Cd (0.00–0.041), Cu (0.006–0.189), Fe (0.413–4.952) and Pb (0.00–0.569). Cadmium, copper and iron levels were below the tolerable limits whereas concentration of lead in the skins of S. commerson, E. chlorostigma, J. belangerii, A. berda; L. argentimaculatus, fillets of J. belangerii, E. chlorostigma and in the heart of J. belangerii exceeded the recommended limits. Therefore fish skin should be discouraged as food for humans or animals. The results indicate that a number of fish species have higher concentration of heavy metals dangerous for human health. Since the fish P. olivaceum (Dhotar) has the lowest level of trace metals therefore we recommend it for breeding and human consumption.

Keywords

Environmental pollutionFish speciesTrace metalsKarachiHuman health

Background

Oceans are a great source of foodstuff for humans and cover 70 % of the earth’s surface. Seafood, particularly fish is used by a significant portion of the world’s population. Fish is a recommended food for the adequate human health. It is a vital source of protein and healthy long chain omega-3 fats capable to prevent heart diseases and improves heart vessel functions. Seafood or fish is also rich with minerals and vitamins which are considered to be important for maintaining human health. However this natural food is being poisoned due to the increment of heavy metals. The reason for this increment is critical environmental pollution. The concentration of heavy metal contamination is an important factor because of its toxic effects on human health (Shahid-ul-Islam and Tanaka 2004; Zehra et al. 2003). These trace metals are tolerable at extremely low concentration and above certain concentration they become toxic for humans. The major risk to human health is disclosure to cadmium, lead, mercury and arsenic (Alam et al. 2002; Maffucci et al. 2005). Heavy metal contamination of marine animals and aquatic ecosystem is associated with a wide range of sources like dumping of industrial waste, untreated sewage, spills of toxic chemicals, agricultural chemicals and others, which can impact the health of marine life. The heavy metals easily gather in the tissues of aquatic life forms and transferred to humans through consumption of contaminated food (Ahmed 1977; Olowu et al. 2010; Qadir et al. 2011; Tuzen 2002).

Since fish contains important nutrients therefore around the world, research has been conducted to document trace metal concentration in different types of marine and fresh water fish species. We present a study of heavy metals concentration like iron, copper, cadmium and lead in the edible and commercially important fish species commonly used by the people in Karachi, Pakistan. It is well known that metals play an important role in many kinds of biological functions. For example, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Fe are vital micronutrients, but become noxious at concentrations greater than those essential for typical growth (Nies 1999) While Cd, Hg, As and Pb are toxic metals even at very low levels (Nies 1999; Wood 1974).

Pollution is one of the global problems. It has different types such as air, soil, water; noise, light, visual and radioactivity etc. (Hameed et al. 2012). There is main focus on the marine pollution because it is a serious issue across the globe (Khoshnood et al. 2012). The estimated population of coastal city Karachi is over 17 million and it is the biggest center of economic activity in Pakistan, with about 6000 small and large industrial units (Qureshi and Riffat 2010). Karachi is situated on the northern boundary of the Arabian Sea. The coastal zone of Karachi covers about 135 km area (Mashiatullah et al. 2012). The Port is located close to the Karachi and the city is famous for the industrial development, education and multicultural activities (Khattak et al. 2012). The disposal of industrial and municipal waste produced from the city is 292 million gallons per day clumped into the sea in the course of two major drains known as Malir and Lyari River. Fishing industry plays an important role in the economy of Pakistan. Most of the population of the coastal areas of Sindh and Balochistan depend on fisheries for the daily food and living. It is also an important source of exports and foreign exchange. Inside Pakistan, fishing is done from rivers, dams, lakes, ponds and canals. Nearly 41 % of the total fish production and packaging obtained from Inland resources.

Experimental

Sampling area

The coastal area of Pakistan limits Arabian Sea. It is around 960 km long and it stretches from the Rann of Kutch South East to the Gawadar North West. The territorial coastal zone of Pakistan consists of 23,820 km2 while Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of Pakistan is about 240,000 km2. Fishermen routinely go for fishing from Pakistani coastal areas and supply sea food back to the different markets of Karachi.

Ten different commercially important and commonly consumed edible marine fish species were collected from different markets of Karachi. Epinephelus chlorostigma locally called Gisser, Labeo rohita (Rohu), Pampus argenteus (White Pomfret), Rachycentron canadum (Sangra), Scombermous commerson (Surmai), Johnius belangerii (Mushka), Lutjanus argentimaculatus (Hira), Trachinotus blochii (Sonaf), Pomadasys olivaceum (Dhotar) and Acanthopagrus berda (Dandya) were randomly selected and purchased from five different markets of Karachi, Liaquat Market (Malir), Water Pump (F. B. Area), New Shabuddin (Lines Area, Saddar), Bangali Parah (Korangi Creek), Sabzi Market (Shah Faisal Colony), during July–October, 2013.

Sample preparation

Three specimens of each fish species were purchased from five markets (Fig. 1) and then separately placed in high quality transparent polythene bags and preserved in deep-freezer until dissection. The fish samples were defrosted, by washing them with de-ionized water. After washing, fish samples were dissected to obtain different parts such as heart, skin and fillet. Each part was separately washed with de-ionized water for several minutes. Samples were dried at 100 °C for 48 h and weighed. The dried samples of each species were ground to fine particles using mortar and pestle. Wet digestion of different parts of each specie was carried out by taking 3 g of powdered sample of skin and fillet while heart of each species as its whole weight in nitric acid (65 %) and hydrogen peroxide as a decolorizing agent. The mixture of each tissue was refluxed on a hot plate until fumes ceased to evolve. Then the mixture was filtered and the filtrate was diluted to 100 mL with de-ionized water in a volumetric flask (Skoog et al. 1996). These solutions were taken in bottles and subjected to analysis.
Fig. 1

Map showing sampling sites of five fish species

Heavy metals analysis

Heavy metals for instance cadmium, copper, iron and lead concentration in fish samples (heart, skin and fillet) were measured by using AAS (Perkin Elmer AAnalyst 700). Standards of cadmium, copper, iron and lead were prepared from the respective stock solutions (Merck). 1 % HNO3 was used as a blank which was prepared in deionized water. Limit of detection was determined by using absorbance of blank and the standard solution of 1 ppm of each element. The limit of detection for Cd, Cu, Fe and Pb were 11.568, 21.452, 3.365 and 1.743 (µg kg−1) respectively. The parameters set for analysis on AAS were:

Metal

Flame type

Slit width (nm)

Wavelength (nm)

Lamp

Cadmium

Air-acetylene

0.7

288.8

EDL

Copper

Air-acetylene

0.7

324.8

HCL

Iron

Air-acetylene

0.2

248.3

HCL

Lead

Air-acetylene

0.7

283.3

EDL

ANOVA (One way, unstaked) at 95 % confidence level is used to compare results of fish species

Results

The results of study showed that the concentration of Cd in all fish species were in range of 0.00–0.041 mg kg−1 (heart), 0.00–0.037 mg kg−1 (skin) and 0.00–0.020 mg kg−1 (fillet). Copper levels in the heart, skin and fillet were measured as 0.006–0.052, 0.030–0.108 and 0.042–0.189 mg kg−1 respectively. Analyzed Iron content in heart tissues was 0.413–3.931 mg kg−1, skin 1.173–4.952 mg kg−1 and fillet 0.685–3.098 mg kg−1. Lead concentration (mg kg−1) was found to be 0.00–0.569 (heart), 0.012–0.529 (skin) and fillet 0.008–0.218 (Table 1; Figs. 2, 3).
Table 1

Metals concentration (mg kg−1) in samples of ten (Arabian Sea Origin) fish species

Fish species

Muscle

Metals

Cd

Mean ± SD

Cu

Mean ± SD

Fe

Mean ± SD

Pb

Mean ± SD

Epinephelus chlorostigma

Heart

0.002 ± 0.0007bc

0.006 ± 0.004b

0.679 ± 0.042b

0.014 ± 0.012b

Skin

0.019 ± 0.005a

0.099 ± 0.066a

4.952 ± 1.824a

0.276 ± 0.260a

Fillet

0.015 ± 0.012ab

0.051 ± 0.024ab

1.006 ± 0.912b

0.168 ± 0.155ab

Labeo rohita

Heart

BDLc

0.024 ± 0.00ab

3.931 ± 0.033a

BDLb

Skin

0.005 ± 0.004bc

0.030 ± 0.016ab

1.469 ± 1.236b

0.066 ± 0.058ab

Fillet

0.003 ± 0.001bc

0.048 ± 0.001ab

1.259 ± 0.531b

0.030 ± 0.018b

Pampus argenteus

Heart

0.002 ± 0.002bc

0.030 ± 0.016ab

0.413 ± 0.140b

0.027 ± 0.024b

Skin

0.005 ± 0.003bc

0.091 ± 0.025a

1.349 ± 0.230b

0.051 ± 0.020ab

Fillet

0.004 ± 0.003bc

0.084 ± 0.013a

1.157 ± 0.170b

0.027 ± 0.017b

Scomberomorus commerson

Heart

BDLc

0.021 ± 0.028a

0.903 ± 0.313b

BDLb

Skin

0.019 ± 0.008a

0.067 ± 0.010a

1.347 ± 0.173b

0.236 ± 0.039ab

Fillet

0.002 ± 0.00bc

0.189 ± 0.045a

3.098 ± 0.117b

0.024 ± 0.011b

Rachycentron canadum

Heart

0.005 ± 0.003bc

0.015 ± 0.016a

0.508 ± 0.140b

0.036 ± 0.022ab

Skin

0.002 ± 0.001bc

0.108 ± 0.021a

1.586 ± 0.230b

0.012 ± 0.005b

Fillet

0.007 ± 0.004abc

0.042 ± 0.004a

0.922 ± 0.657b

0.013 ± 0.003b

Johnius belangerii

Heart

0.027 ± 0.0007c

0.021 ± 0.0168

1.101 ± 0.0117ab

0.569 ± 0.0066a

Skin

0.037 ± 0.034b

0.075 ± 0.010abc

2.468 ± 0.726a

0.529 ± 0.451a

Fillet

0.020 ± 0.014a

0.053 ± 0.004bc

2.001 ± 0.950ab

0.218 ± 0.108ab

Trachinotus blochii

Heart

0.041 ± 0.005bc

0.038 ± 0.018bc

1.013 ± 0.196ab

0.059 ± 0.042b

Skin

0.004 ± 0.001

0.074 ± 0.016abc

1.457 ± 0.037ab

0.021 ± 0.018b

Fillet

0.004 ± 0.001

0.088 ± 0.024abc

1.330 ± 1.101ab

0.046 ± 0.025b

Lutjanus argentimaculatus

Heart

BDL

0.035 ± 0.022c

1.589 ± 0.941ab

0.001 ± 0.001b

Skin

BDL

0.078 ± 0.049abc

1.442 ± 0.186ab

0.147 ± 0.099b

Fillet

BDL

0.092 ± 0.029abc

1.071 ± 0.126ab

0.099 ± 0.034b

Acanthopagrus berda

Heart

0.001 ± 0.001

0.052 ± 0.019bc

0.66 ± 0.044b

0.0087 ± 0.002b

Skin

0.012 ± 0.002

0.107 ± 0.019ab

1.526 ± 0.149ab

0.131 ± 0.028b

Fillet

0.004 ± 0.003

0.127 ± 0.036a

1.196 ± 0.262ab

0.015 ± 0.007b

Pomadasys olivaceum

Heart

0.004 ± 0.001

0.019 ± 0.018

0.564 ± 0.224b

0.005 ± 0.004b

Skin

0.009 ± 0.005

0.032 ± 0.015c

1.173 ± 0.775ab

0.051 ± 0.038b

Fillet

0.006 ± 0.001

0.045 ± 0.015bc

0.685 ± 0.090ab

0.008 ± 0.006b

Reference values

IAEA-407 (2003)

0.189

3.280

146.0

0.120

WHO (1989)

DNA

30.0

100

2.0

FAO (1983)

DNA

30.0

DNA

0.50

Data generated from individual tripliocate readings (n = 3)

BDL below detection limit, DNA data is not available

a–c Values indicates that means (X) that do not share a letter are significantly different at 95 % confidence level (ANNOVA, One way, unstaked)

Fig. 2

Mean concentration of metals in five fish species

Fig. 3

Mean concentration of metals in five fish species

Epinephelus chlorostigma (Gisser) was found to have higher accumulation of metals in the skin. Metal contents in different parts were in order of skin > fillet > heart. Iron was highest (4.952 mg kg−1) in the skin while concentrations of Pb, Cu and Cd in the skin (mg kg−1) were 0.276, 0.099 and 0.019 respectively. A comparison of concentrations with those set by the International Atomic Energy Agency-407 limits (International Atomic Energy Agency-407 2003) for the edible fish showed higher concentration of lead in the skin (0.276 mg kg−1) and fillet (0.168 mg kg−1) of E. chlorostigma. Metal accumulation in the fish E. chlorostigma showed the following order iron > lead > copper > cadmium. Varying accretion pattern of heavy metals was analyzed in the different parts of L. rohita (Rohu). Heart of L. rohita contains high concentration of iron (3.931 mg kg−1), cadmium and lead were higher in the skin and copper in the fillet. Order of metal content in fish L. rohita was iron > copper > lead > cadmium.

The skin of P. argenteus was found to accumulate higher amounts of all the investigated heavy metals. Iron showed excess in all parts (2.919 mg kg−1). The contents of heavy metals in P. argenteus (White Pomfret) showed the following order iron > copper > lead > cadmium. Iron was found higher in the heart, skin and fillet of Scomberomorus commerson (Surmai) while highest concentration of cadmium 0.019 mg kg−1 was present in the skin. Skin of S. commerson also contained high concentration of lead (0.236 mg kg−1) and exceeded the International Atomic Energy Agency-407 limits (Table 1). While copper was high in the fillet (0.189 mg kg−1). Accumulation order of heavy metals in S. commerson was iron > copper > lead > cadmium. Like other fish species, R. canadum also accumulated high amounts of iron in its heart, skin and fillet. Concentrations of metals such as cadmium, copper and lead were 0.007 mg kg−1 (fillet), 0.108 mg kg−1 (skin) and 0.036 mg kg−1 (heart) respectively. Heavy metal contents in R. canadum (Sangra) were in the following order iron > copper > lead > cadmium.

The concentration (mg kg−1) of cadmium, copper, iron and lead in J. belangerii (Mushka) was in the order: heart: iron > lead > cadmium > copper; skin: iron > lead > copper > cadmium and in fillet: iron > lead > copper > cadmium. The highest and lowest amounts of iron and cadmium were found in the skin and fillet except heart in which copper was the least. The total metal contents were in the order of iron > lead > copper > cadmium. Cadmium, copper and iron accumulation were high in skin; the concentration of lead was high in the heart of J. belangerii. Lead in heart (0.569 mg kg−1) and skin (0.529 mg kg−1) exceeded the IAEA-407 and FAO limits. In fish species T. blochii (Sonaf), Cd (0.041 mg kg−1) and Pb (0.059 mg kg−1) accumulations were higher in the heart; the concentration of Cu was higher in the fillet (0.088 mg kg−1), while concentration of Fe (1.457 mg kg−1) was higher in the skin. The accrual order of metals was iron > copper > lead > cadmium.

The concentrations (mg kg−1) of cadmium, copper, iron and lead in the heart, skin and fillet of the fish L. argentimaculatus (Hira) were in the order of Heart: iron > copper > lead; Skin: iron > lead > copper; Fillet: iron > lead > copper and cadmium not detected in all tissues. The highest accumulation of iron (1.589 mg kg−1) was found in the heart, copper in fillet (0.092 mg kg−1) and lead in skin (0.147 mg kg−1).

Table 2 shows that in A. berda (Dandya) maximum level of cadmium accumulated in skin (0.012 mg kg−1), copper in fillet (0.127 mg kg−1), iron (1.526 mg kg−1) and lead (0.131 mg kg−1) in skin. The concentrations (mg kg−1) of cadmium, copper, iron and lead in A. berda were iron > copper > lead > cadmium. The concentrations of cadmium, copper, iron and lead in Pomadsys olivaceum (Dhotar) heart, skin and fillet was in the order of Heart: iron > copper > lead > cadmium; Skin: iron > lead > copper > cadmium and Fillet: iron > copper > lead > cadmium. This indicates similar accumulation pattern of metals in these species of fish. The highest amount of iron was in the skin (1.173 mg kg−1) and least amount of cadmium was found in the heart (0.004 mg kg−1).
Table 2

Comparison of metals in fish species with other studies (mg kg−1)

Location

Fish species

Cd

Cu

Fe

Pb

Reference #

Keti Bunder Thatta, Pakistan

Pampus argenteus

0.024

0.002

0.081

3.60

18

Keti Bunder Thatta, Pakistan

Labeo rohita

0.035

0.001

0.247

0.133

18

Indus River, Pakistan

Oreochromis mossambicus

2.87–3.60

26

Indus River, Pakistan

Cyprinus carpio

1.08–1.52

27

Baluchistan coast, Pakistan

Acanthopagrus berda

0.076

0.416

0.326

2

Arabian sea, Pakistan

 

0.320

4.120

19

North side of Hormoz striate,

Persian Gulf and Iran

 

0.205

1.055

12

Osaka, Japan

 

0.027

0.048

20

Manila Bay, Philippines

 

0.024

0.135

21

Masan Bay, Korea

 

0.015

0.076

22

Discussion

Cadmium is a noxious element that enhances the formation of kidney stones and excretion of calcium in urine. Skeletal damage may be caused by long term exposure to cadmium (Jarup 2003). Results indicate that the highest accretion of cadmium (0.041 mg kg−1) is found in the heart of T. blochii. Previous studies have reported that in different fish species (Table 2), Cd was (0.024–0.035 mg kg−1) in Keti Bunder Thatta, (0.076 mg kg−1) in Baluchistan coast (Tabinda et al. 2010) and (0.320 mg kg−1) in the Arabian Sea (Tariq et al. 1994). The levels of Cd were higher than the other regions reported data (Osaka, Japan 0.027 mg kg−1, Manila Bay, Philippines 0.024 mg kg−1 and Masan Bay, Korea 0.015 mg kg−1) (Masahiro et al. 1999; Maricar et al. 1997; Kwon and Lee 2001). Cadmium in the fish species samples were in the order of J. belangerii > T. blochii > E. chlorostigma > S. commerson > P. olivaceum > A. berda > R. canadum > P. argenteus > L. rohita. Cadmium is not detected in the skin, fillet and heart of L. argentimaculatus, therefore, it is considered Cd-free fish.

Cu is vital for the apt functioning of various organs and metabolic course of actions. It is a micro nutrient that is incorporated into a variety of proteins and metal conenzymes performing important metabolic functions, necessary for growth and development of bones, for the maintenance of health, brain, heart, connective tissues and many other organs present in human body. Variable concentration of Cu was recorded in the muscles, skin and heart of all species of fish. High accumulation of copper (0.189 mg kg−1) was found in Fillet of S. commerson. Cu levels were below the permissible limit (30 mg kg−1) of WHO and FAO (World Health Organization 1989; Food and Agricultural Organization 1983). Cu concentrations in reported data were 0.002 mg kg−1 in P. argenteus, 0.001 mg kg−1 in L. rohita from Keti Bunder Thatta, Pakistan (Tabinda et al. 2010) and 0.416 mg kg−1 from Baluchistan coast, Pakistan (Zehra et al. 2003). Accumulation of copper was found in the following order; A. berda > S. commerson > L. argentimaculatus = P. argenteus > T. blochii > R. canadum > E. chlorostigma > J. belangerii > L. rohita > P. olivaceum.

Major role of Fe is to merge with protein and copper in the formation of hemoglobin. Iron deficiency results in anemia. Iron accumulation was found higher in the fillet of S. commerson (3.098 mg kg−1), in the skin of E. chlorostigma (4.952 mg kg−1) and in the heart of L. rohita (3.931 mg kg−1) fish species. In fish species P. argenteus and L. rohita from Keti Bunder Thatta, Pakistan, Fe was 0.081 and 0.247 mg kg−1 respectively (Jarup 2003). The acceptable level of Fe in fish is 100 mg kg−1 (World Health Organization 1989). Accumulation of iron in the ten fish species showed the following order L. rohita > E. chlorostigma > J. belangerii > S. commerson > L. argentimaculatus > T. blochii > A. berda > R. canadum > P. argenteus > P. olivaceum.

Pb is a non-essential and toxic element investigated through biological activities (Adeyeye et al. 1996). The rapid industrialization has augmented the risk of lead exposure to humans via diverse kinds of food chains. The lead exposure may show terrible effects on the organs particularly kidneys, blood circulatory system and nervous system of a person. Lead growth was found high in the skin of S. commerson (0.236 mg kg−1), E. chlorostigma (0.276 mg kg−1), A. berda (0.131 mg kg−1), L. argentimaculatus (0.147 mg kg−1); in fillet of J. belangerii (0.218 mg kg−1), E. chlorostigma (0.168 mg kg−1) and crossed the recommended value of IAEA-407 while IAEA-407 and FAO recommended values were exceeded by skin (0.529 mg kg−1) and heart (0.569 mg kg−1) of J. belangerii. Pb levels were lower than the previously reported studies of Tabinda et al. 2010 (3.60 mg kg−1, Keti Bunder Thatta, Pakistan) Jabeen and Chaudhry 2009 (2.87–3.60 mg kg−1, Indus River, Pakistan) (Jabeen and Chaudhry 2009); Jabeen and Chaudhry 2010 (1.08–1.52 mg kg−1, Indus River, Pakistan) (Jabeen and Chaudhry 2010); Tariq et al. 1994 (4.120 mg kg−1, Arabian Sea, Pakistan) (Tariq et al. 1994) and Khoshnood et al. 2012 (1.055 mg kg−1, Persian Gulf, Iran) (Khoshnood et al. 2012). Lead accumulated in the 10 fish species showed the following order J. belangerii > E. chlorostigma > S. commerson > L. argentimaculatus > A. berda > T. blochii > P. argenteus > L. rohita > P. olivaceum > R. canadum. The permissible limit of lead is 0.120 mg kg−1 (IAEA-407 2003), 2.0 mg kg−1 (WHO 1989) and 0.5 mg kg−1 (FAO 1983).

Conclusion

This work gives information regarding the concentration of heavy metals present in the edible samples of fish taken from the markets in Karachi. Iron and copper are essential while cadmium and lead are toxic for humans. Heavy metal concentrations recorded in fish species were compared with FAO, WHO and the International Atomic Energy Agency-407. It was noted that the concentration of Pb in the skin of S. commerson (Surmai), E. chlorostigma (Gisser), A. berda (Dandya) and L. argentimaculatus (Hira); fillet of J. belangerii (Mushka) and E. chlorostigma exceeded the IAEA-407 recommended values whereas skin and heart of J. belangerii crossed the permissible limits of IAEA-407. Iron, cadmium and Copper concentrations in all samples were within the acceptable limits of AEA-407, FAO and WHO. The results showed that the lead concentration exceeded the tolerable values in some fish samples. Lead is a toxic metal and it possesses hazardous effects on humans so consumption of fish contaminated with these metals can be a health risk. Therefore, it is essential that biological screening of the fish and water should be done frequently to make sure the unremitting safety of the seafood particularly fish. Secure removal into the sea should be practiced to avoid possible contamination especially heavy metals into the food-chain. Due to low concentration of toxic metals, fish species such as P. olivaceum, P. argenteus and R. canadum are recommended as sea food.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KY: Organized the research plan and looked after experimental work and all research work. MAM: Summarized the experimental work in manuscript format. NAK, NK: Did sampling, digestion of samples and collection of data. AR: Run all the samples on Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer and applied ANOVA Test on data. MH: Helped in literature survey and writing of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors are extremely grateful to the HEC Pakistan and Dean Faculty of Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology for funding and support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology
(2)
Department of Chemistry, Mirpur University of Science & Technology (MUST)
(3)
Nabiqasim Industries (Pvt) Ltd. Commerce Centre

References

  1. Adeyeye EI, Akinyugha NJ et al (1996) Determination of some metals in Clarias gariepinus (Cuvier and Valenciennes), Cyprino carpio (L.) and Oreochromis niloticus fishes in a polyculture freshwater pond and their environments. Aquaculture 47:205–214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed M (1977) An assessment of the magnitude of coastal pollution in Pakistan through a survey of its marine fauna and fisheries. Thalassia Jugosalavica THJUAP 12(3/4):395Google Scholar
  3. Alam MGM, Tanaka A et al (2002) A comparison of trace element concentrations in cultured wild carp (Cyprinus carpio) of Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecol Environ Saf 53:348–354View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Food and Agricultural Organization (1983) Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products, vol 464. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) Fishery Circular, pp 5–100Google Scholar
  5. Hameed I, Soomro YA et al (2012) Coastline pollution problems of Karachi. Int J Emerg Trends Eng Dev 4:528–537Google Scholar
  6. International Atomic Energy Agency-407 (2003) Analytical Quality Control Services, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  7. Jabeen F, Chaudhry AS (2009) Environmental impacts of authropogenic activities on the mineral uptake in Oreochromis mossambicus from Indus River in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1029-Z Google Scholar
  8. Jabeen F, Chaudhry AS (2010) Monitoring trace metals in different tissues of Cyprinus carpio from the Indus River in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 170:645–656. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-1263-4 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Med Bull 68:167–182View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Khattak MI, Khattak MI et al (2012) Study of heavy metal pollution in Magrove sediments reference to marine environment along the coastal areas of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 44:373–378Google Scholar
  11. Khoshnood Z, Khoshnood R et al (2012) Determination of Cd, Pb, Hg, Cu, Fe, Mn, Al, As, Ni, and Zn in important commercial fish species in Northern of Persian Gulf. J Cell Anim Biol 6:1–9Google Scholar
  12. Kwon YT, Lee CW (2001) Ecological risk assessment of sediment in wastewater discharging area by means of metal specification. Microchem J 70:255–264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Maffucci F, Caurant F et al (2005) Trace element (Cd, Cu, Hg, Se and Zn) accumulation and tissue distribution in loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from the Western Mediterranean Sea (Southern Italy). Chemos 58:535–542View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Maricar P, Eun-Young K et al (1997) Metal levels in some commercial fish species from Manila Bay the Philippines. Mar Pollut Bull 34:671–674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Masahiro Y, Tomohiko F et al (1999) Heavy metal contents in Osaka Bay sediments. Kankyo Jiban Kogaku Shinpojiumu Happyo Ronbunshu 3:233–238Google Scholar
  16. Mashiatullah A, Chaudhary MZ et al (2012) Metal pollution and ecology risk assessment in Marine sediments of Karachi coast, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 185:1555–1565View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nies DH (1999) Microbial heavy metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730–750View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Olowu AR, Ayejuyo OO et al (2010) Assessment of pollution trend of Oke Afa Canal Lagos, Nigeria. E J Chem 7:605–611View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Qadir A, Malik N et al (2011) Heavy metals in eight edible fish species from two polluted tributaries (Aik and Palkhu) of the River Chenab, Pakistan. Biol Res Trace Elem 143:1524–1540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Qureshi RM et al (2002) Contribution of Pakistan in IAEA/RCA/UNDP, regional project of management of marine coastal environment and its pollution. Science Vision 7(3–4):210–223Google Scholar
  21. Shahid-ul-Islam DM, Tanaka M (2004) Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystem including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management. Rev Synth 48:624–649Google Scholar
  22. Skoog AD, West MD et al (1996) Fundamentals of analytical chemistry, 7th edn. Thomson Learning Academic Inc, pp 750–752Google Scholar
  23. Tabinda AB, Hussain M et al (2010) Accumulation of toxic and essential trace metals in fish and prawns from Keti Bunder Thatta District, Sindh. Pak J Zool 42:631–638Google Scholar
  24. Tariq J, Jaffar M et al (1994) Trace metal concentration, distribution and correlation in water, sediment and fish from the Ravi, Pakistan. Fish Res 19:131–139View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tuzen M (2002) Determination of heavy metals in fish samples of the middle Black Sea (Turkey) by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy. Food Chem 80:119–123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wood JM (1974) Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment. Science 183:1049–1052View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization (1989) Environment health criteria. Heavy metals-environmental aspects. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. Zehra I, Kauser T et al (2003) Determination of Cu, Cd, Pb and Zn concentration in edible marine fish Acanthopagurus berda along Baluchistan Coast-Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 5:80–82Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016