Factors affecting the yield of bio-oil from the pyrolysis of coconut shell
© Gao et al. 2016
Received: 25 September 2015
Accepted: 3 March 2016
Published: 15 March 2016
Coconut is a high-quality agricultural product of the Asia–Pacific region. In this paper, coconut shell which mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin was used as a raw material for coconut shell oil from coconut shell pyrolysis. The influence of the pyrolysis temperature, heating rate and particle size on coconut oil yield was investigated, and the effect of heating rate on coconut oil components was discussed. Experimental results show that the maximum oil yield of 75.74 wt% (including water) were obtained under the conditions that the final pyrolysis temperature 575 °C, heating rate 20 °C/min, coconut shell diameter about 5 mm. Thermal gravimetric analysis was used and it can be seen that coconut shell pyrolysis process can be divided into three stages: water loss, pyrolysis and pyrocondensation. The main components of coconut-shell oil are water (about 50 wt%), aromatic, phenolic, acid, ketone and ether containing compounds.
KeywordsCoconut shell Pyrolysis Coconut oil Oil yield Pyrolysis oil
Energy shortages and environmental contamination are growing problems in modern society. Biomass oil is a natural fuel product which can be obtained from cellulose and hemicelluloses synthesized during photosynthesis (Li and Ying 2009). In this process, CO2 and H2O are combined to form a green energy alternative to diminishing fossil fuel reserves (Department of Energy 2011; Davis et al. 2009). These materials also have the potential to alleviate worsening environmental pollution. Biomass oil is the fourth largest energy source in the world (Jiang 2002). Biomass oil can be industrially produced on a large scale and will play a major role in China’s future energy development. Optimization of biomass production is needed for the advancement of this energy producing chemical industry (Anastas and Kirchhoff 2002; Kitajima and Yamamoto 2002).
Biomass pyrolysis is a widely used technology for biomass energy production (Patun et al. 2005). Pyrolysis is one of the most economical and promising technologies to convert biomass to liquid fuel products. Pyrolysis will produce a high yield of liquid products when performed under hypoxic conditions, high temperatures (400–500 °C), a short residence time for the volatile component (less than 5 s) and a heating rate of 10–200 °C/min (Balat et al. 2009; Bridgwater 2012; Zhang et al. 2007).
Biomass pyrolysis produces three main products, flammable gas, liquid pyrolysis oil, and solid charcoal. The gas product contains methane, which is widely present in natural gas, biogas, and coal mine gases. It is a high quality gas fuel and an important raw material for the manufacture of syngas and many chemical products. Liquid products can be refined to produce liquid fuels or value-added products, and can also be used as a chemical raw material. The products of liquid biomass pyrolysis manufacturing include adhesives, phenol, and liquid fuel or resin (Trinh et al. 2013). Solid charcoal can be used directly or to produce activated carbon or battery and electrode components.
Biomass pyrolysis technology has been well studied in China (Li et al. 2013). Du et al. (2009) evaluated the pyrolysis of solid wood and pine bark at different heating rates and with different particle sizes to show that increases in the heating rate were associated with thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves and that weight loss rate curves shifted to a higher temperature zone. Tunce and Gerce (2004) studied the effects of heating rate, pyrolysis temperature and gas atmosphere on bio-oil production. The highest oil yield was achieved with a pyrolysis temperature of 550 °C, and heating rate of 7 °C/min. Liu et al. (2012) analyzed the pyrolysis of raw coconut shells using TGA. The pyrolysis of coconut shells was divided into water loss, pyrolysis and pyrocondensation stages.
Coconut is a high-quality agricultural product of the Asia–Pacific region. The major coconut producing area in China is Hainan. Despite the presence of abundant coconut resources in Hainan, coconut processing operations remain under-developed. The pyrolysis of coconut shells yields coconut shell oil, from which value-added products and chemical raw materials can be produced. Coconut shell has a tough natural structure and low ash content, making it ideal for easy physical processing and low environmental impact. Hasanah et al. (2012) analyzed the chemical composition and physical properties of the light and heavy tar resulted from coconut shell pyrolysis. We used TGA to study the effects of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate and particle size on coconut shell oil production. The main components of the coconut oil product were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
Hainan coconut drupe was used as the raw material. The coconut was opened, the eatable portion removed, and the coconut shell collected. The coconut shell was ground and fragments sized using graded sieves. Coconut fragments 0.1–1, 4–8, and 10–20 mm were placed in a digital thermostatic drying oven at 120 °C for 12 h before evaluation.
TGA was performed using an integrated thermal analyzer STA449C (NETZSCH, Germany) with 99.99 % nitrogen carrier gas at a rate of 30 mL/min. The samples were heated from room temperature at certain rate to a selected temperature. FTIR analysis of coconut shell oil was performed using an FTIR spectrometer AVATAR 360 (Nicolet, USA).
KF-1A type semi-automatic moisture analyzer was used to analyze the water content in coconut oil product. The Karl Fischer titration was applied in analyzing.
Results and discussions
Evaluation of final material temperature on yield
Evaluation of heating rate
The TG curves produced with these two heating rates were similar, suggesting the pyrolysis mechanisms were similar (Fig. 3). The TG curves demonstrated three stages of pyrolysis, water loss, pyrolysis and pyrocondensation.
The first stage occurred at 25–200 °C. There were small changes in mass during this stage. Weight loss was mainly due to water loss and structural rearrangements with the release of small molecular weight compounds. Water loss in this stage consisted of unbound and bound water.
The second stage occurred at 200–600 °C. The pyrolysis of coconut shell to yield non-condensable small-molecular-weight gases and condensable large molecular weight volatile components resulted in significant changes in the sample mass. The main components of coconut shell are hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Pyrolysis reactions break down these three compounds into lower molecular weight components. Hemicellulose is the most volatile of the three compounds and lignin has a benzene ring, making it the most difficult and last to decompose. The largest weight loss occurred in this stage, mostly between 220 and 450 °C.
The third stage occurred at 600–800 °C. The main reaction here was pyrocondensation and the beginning of carbonization. The C–H and C–O bonds in the residual organic coconut shell material were cleaved to generate non-condensable volatile components. The mass change in this stage was extremely small.
The DTG curves from the two heating rates showed three peaks (Fig. 4). A small peak was seen from room temperature to 150 °C. This area corresponded to water loss from the raw material. The two subsequent peaks were due to the different pyrolysis characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Hemicellulose is the most unstable of these compounds. The second peak was formed due to the pyrolysis of hemicellulose, with a maximum weight loss rate from 250 to 300 °C. The third peak was seen with heating from 320 to 350 °C and was mainly due to the pyrolysis of cellulose. Lignin is most resistant to decomposition, with a small pyrolysis rate over a wide temperature range. Very little weight loss was seen from 500 to 600 °C, suggesting little pyrolysis occurred. The weight loss curve was flat above 575 °C, suggesting no further pyrolysis occurred. No more coconut shell oil was produced in this range.
The more rapid heating rate was associated with a slight shift of the TG curve to a higher temperature. The higher heating rate resulted in a more vigorous pyrolysis reaction. The higher heating rate was associated with greater weight loss in the coconut shell and more complete thermal cracking of the contained oils (Fig. 4).
Evaluation of particle size
Particle size of raw materials versus oil yield
Particle size (mm)
Oil yield (wt%)
Coconut oil composition
It was shown from Fig. 6 that absorption intensity of –OH increased with the increasing of heating rate, which showed that the amount of phenolic increased in coconut-shell oil. C=O (aromatic) increased with the increasing of heating rate, so aromatic substances in coconut-shell oil was also influenced by heating rate.
Water content in coconut oil
Water content of coconut oil in different process conditions
In summary, we have demonstrated that the pyrolysis temperature, heating rate and particle size were the main factors affecting the yield of bio-oil from the pyrolysis of coconut shell. The maximum oil yield of 75.74 wt% (including water) were obtained at final temperature of 575 °C, heating rate of 20 °C/min and particle size of 5 mm for the coconut-shell. The main components of coconut-shell oil are water (about 50 wt%), aromatic, phenolic, acid, ketone and ether containing compounds.
YG designed experiments; YY carried out experiments; YG, ZQ and YS analyzed experimental results. YG and YY wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (No. E2012209033) and Hebei Province Foundation for Returness.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Anastas PT, Kirchhoff MM (2002) Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry. Acc Chem Res 35:686–694View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balat M, Balat M, Kirtay E, Balat H (2009) Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals. Part 1: pyrolysis systems. Energy Convers Manag 50:3147–3157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bridgwater AV (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy 38:68–94View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davis SC, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, DeLucia EH (2009) Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends Plant Sci 14:140–146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Department of Energy (2011) Manufacturing energy and carbon footprints. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/rd/footprints.html. Accessed 31 Jan 12
- Du H-S, Tang J-M, LI R et al (2009) Pyrolysis characteristics of larch wood. J Northeast For Univ 37(12):25–29Google Scholar
- Hasanah U, Setiaji B, Triyono T et al (2012) The chemical composition and physical properties of the light and heavy tar resulted from coconut shell pyrolysis. J Pure Appl Chem Res 1(1):26–32Google Scholar
- Jiang J-C (2002) Application status and development prospects of biomass energy. Chem Ind For Prod 22(2):75–80Google Scholar
- Kitajima M, Yamamoto Y (2002) Green and sustainable chemistry in Japan. Green Chem 12:59–61Google Scholar
- Li X-Y, Ying H (2009) Progress in the studies on the mechanism of biomass pyrolysis and gasification. Adv Fine Petrochem 10:45–50Google Scholar
- Li S-P, Wang S-Y, Sun X et al (2013) Research status on the fluidized-bed pyrolysis of biomass. Biomass Chem Eng 47(1):54–60View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu X-M, Jiang J-C, SUN K et al (2012) Kinetic analysis of coconut shell pyrolysis. J Anhui Agric Sci 40(27):13540–13542Google Scholar
- Patun AE, Ozbay N, Onal EP et al (2005) Fixed-bed pyrolysis of cotton for liquid and solid products. Fuel Process Technol 86:1207–1219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trinh TN, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K et al (2013) Comparison of lignin, macroalgae, wood, and straw fast pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 27:1399–1409View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tunce F, Gerce FH (2004) Production and characterization of pyrolysis oils from euphorbia macroclada. Energy Resour 26:761–770Google Scholar
- Zhang Q, Chang J, Wang T, Xu Y (2007) Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Convers Manag 48:87–92View ArticleGoogle Scholar