- Research
- Open Access

# A numerical solution of a singular boundary value problem arising in boundary layer theory

- Jiancheng Hu
^{1}Email author

**Received:**6 November 2015**Accepted:**15 February 2016**Published:**27 February 2016

## Abstract

In this paper, a second-order nonlinear singular boundary value problem is presented, which is equivalent to the well-known Falkner–Skan equation. And the one-dimensional third-order boundary value problem on interval \([0,\infty )\) is equivalently transformed into a second-order boundary value problem on finite interval \([\beta , 1]\). The finite difference method is utilized to solve the singular boundary value problem, in which the amount of computational effort is significantly less than the other numerical methods. The numerical solutions obtained by the finite difference method are in agreement with those obtained by previous authors.

## Keywords

- Falkner–Skan equation
- Nonlinear boundary value problems
- Newton’s method
- Finite difference method

## Background

The well-known nonlinear third-order Falkner–Skan equation is one of the nonlinear two-point boundary value problem (BVP) on infinite intervals. This problem arises in the study of laminar boundary layers exhibiting similarity in fluid mechanics. The solutions of the one-dimensional third-order boundary-value problem described by the Falkner–Skan equation are the similarity solutions of the two-dimensional incompressible laminar boundary layer equations (Cheng 1977; Merkin 1980; Salama 2004; Postelnicu and Pop 2011; Mosayebidorcheh 2013).

The nonlinear BVP (1–2) with \(\beta =0\) is studied (Aly et al. 2003; Nazar et al. 2004) and comes from the study of a plane mixed convection boundary-layer flow near a semi-infinite vertical surface, with a prescribed power law of the distance from the leading edge for the temperature. About BVP (1–2), there have existed some interesting results about the problem above. For example, there admits a unique convex solution (i.e., such that \(f''(\eta )>0\)) for \(\lambda >0\) and \(0<\beta <1\) (Brighi and Hoernel 2006); also there admits a unique concave solution (i.e., such that \(f''(\eta )<0\)) for \(\lambda >0\) and \(\beta >1\). It is unfortunate that they did not consider the case of \(\lambda \le 0\) and few results are available for \(\lambda \le 0\).

Current numerical analysis is an important technique for the solution of the Falkner–Skan equation. One key problem for numerical technique is how to deal with the infinite boundary. Early approaches have mainly used shooting or invariant imbedding (Cebeci and Keller 1971; Na 1979). Asaithambi presented an asymptotic condition and truncated the infinite boundary condition by an unknown \(\eta _{\infty }\) (Asaithambi 1998, 2004, 2005). Adomian decomposition method was developed to obtain series solutions instead of truncating the infinite boundary (Elgazery 2005; Alizadeh et al. 2009). Yang and Hu (2008) transformed the problem to a singular boundary value problem on finite interval and proposed Galerkin finite element method.

Based on ideas (Yang 2003; Lan and Yang 2008), the purpose of this paper is to transform the problem mentioned above to a singular boundary value problem on a finite interval and develop a finite difference method which is much more effective and simpler than the other existing methods for BVP (1–2), and which requires much less computational effort.

## Transformation formula

Lan and Yang (2008) established the equivalence between the Falkner–Skan equation and a singular integral equation. In this paper, the BVP (1–2) is transformed to a second-order singular boundary value problem, and the solution of BVP (1–2) is characterized by \(f''(0)\).

*t*yields

*t*yields

*t*with respect to

*s*, we get

## Numerical solutions of boundary value problem

*N*subintervals with step size \(h=\frac{\;1-\beta \;}{\;N\;}\), and define \(t_{j}=\beta +jh\) for \(j=0, 1, \ldots , N\). Let \(w_j\) denotes the values of \(w(t_{j})\) for \(j=0, 1, \ldots , N\). Let \(t=t_{j}\), the finite difference formulation of Eq. (13) writes as

*k*-

*th*Newton’s iterates \({\mathbf{w} }^{k}=[w_{0}^k,w_{1}^k, \ldots \quad w_{N}^k]^T,k=1,2,\ldots ,\) can be obtained by solving system (22). Newton’s method for the solution of Eq. (22) proceeds to yield subsequent iterates for

**w**as

- Step 1.
Input the values \(\lambda \), number of subintervals N and stopping condition \(\varepsilon \)

- Step 2.
Initialize \(\beta \),\(k\leftarrow 0\), step size \(h \leftarrow \frac{1-\beta }{N}\) and \({\mathbf{w}}_{N}\leftarrow {\mathbf 0} \),

- Step 3.
- Step 4.
Repeat through step 3 until \(\Vert \triangle {\mathbf{w}}^{k}\Vert _{\infty }<\varepsilon \) is satisfied.

## Results and discussion

Error results of finite difference method and Galerkin finite element method

\(\beta \) | \(\lambda \) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

\(-\)0.10 | \(-\)0.15 | \(-\)0.18 | \(-\)0.20 | \(-\)0.25 | \(-\)0.30 | |

0 | \(2.985\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.433\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.780\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.051\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.892\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(5.427\times {10^{-6}}\) |

0.1 | \(3.010\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.465\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.818\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.096\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.976\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(5.882\times {10^{-6}}\) |

0.2 | \(3.074\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.543\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.910\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.202\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(5.167\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(6.962\times {10^{-6}}\) |

0.3 | \(3.174\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(3.664\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.051\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.364\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(5.452\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(8.674\times {10^{-5}}\) |

0.5 | \(3.516\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.076\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.532\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.913\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(6.419\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(1.540\times {10^{-5}}\) |

0.7 | \(4.270\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.993\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(5.609\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(6.151\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(8.662\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(4.706\times {10^{-5}}\) |

0.9 | \(7.320\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(8.807\times {10^{-6}}\) | \(1.021\times {10^{-5}}\) | \(1.157\times {10^{-5}}\) | \(1.993\times {10^{-5}}\) | \(1.303\times {10^{-4}}\) |

It can be seen from Fig. 1, where \(f''(0)(=w(\beta ))\) is plotted as a function of \(\beta \) in the range of \(0\le \beta \le 1\), curves are drawn for value \(\lambda = -0.30, -0.25, -0.20, -0.18, -0.15, -0.10\). It is also shown that \(f''(0)(=w(\beta ))\) changes smoothly with \(\beta \). As \(\lambda \) increases, the results also increase in the range of \(0\le \beta \le 1\).

Because the Eq. (13) is a second-order boundary value problem, the amount of computational effort used by finite difference method is significantly less than the other numerical methods of the third-order differential equation which essentially solve two or more initial value problems during each iteration (Asaithambi 2004). In general, the numerical simulation shows that the initial guess for \({\mathbf{w}}^{0}\) could be far away from the exact value. For each fixed value of \({\mathbf{w}}^{0}\), the method in this paper required 2–6 iterations in order to solve system (22) to the desired accuracy.

## Conclusions

In this work, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of the finite difference method to Falkner–Skan equation. Applying equivalent transformation to Falkner–Skan equation, a third-order boundary value problem in infinite interval is transformed into a second-order boundary value problem in finite interval. By using finite difference method and Newton’s iteration approximation, the numerical solution have been calculated.

The results of comparison studied in this paper indicate that, the values of the Newton’s iteration for \(f''(0)(=w(\beta ))\) are in excellent agreement with those results obtained by previous authors. Therefore, the method presented in this work shows its validity and great potential for the solution of Falkner–Skan equations arising in science and engineering .

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 13ZB0086) and the Scientific Research Foundation of CUIT (Grant No. KYTZ201425). The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading of the original manuscript and their constructive comments.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Alizadeh E, Farhadi M, Sedighi K, Ebrahimi-Kebria HR, Ghafourian A (2009) Solution of the Falkner–Skan equation for wedge by Adomian Decomposition Method. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14(3):724–733View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aly EH, Elliott L, Ingham DB (2003) Mixed convection boundary-layer flow over a vertical surface embedded in a porous medium. Eur J Mech B Fluid 22(6):529–543View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asaithambi A (1998) A finite-difference method for the solution of the Falkner–Skan equation. Appl Math Comput 92(2):135–141View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asaithambi A (2004) Numerical solution of the Falkner–Skan equation using piecewise linear functions. Appl Math Comput 159(1):267–273View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asaithambi A (2005) Solution of the Falkner–Skan equation by recursive evaluation of Taylor coefficients. J Comput Appl Math 176(1):203–214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brighi B, Hoernel JD (2006) On the concave and convex solutions of a mixed convection boundary layer approximation in a porous medium. Appl Math Lett 19(1):69–74View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cebeci T, Keller HB (1971) Shooting and parallel shooting methods for solving the Falkner–Skan boundary-layer equation. J Comput Phys 7(2):289–300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng P (1977) Combined free and forced convection flow about inclined surfaces in porous media. Int J Heat Mass Transf 20(77):807–814Google Scholar
- Elgazery NS (2005) Numerical solution for the Falkner–Skan equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 35(4):738–746View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lan KQ, Yang GC (2008) Positive solutions of the Falkner–Skan equation arising in the boundary layer theory. Can Math Bull 51(3):386–398View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Merkin JH (1980) Mixed convection boundary layer flow on a vertical surface in a saturated porous medium. J Eng Math 14(4):301–313View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mosayebidorcheh S (2013) Solution of the boundary layer equation of the power-law pseudoplastic fluid using differential transform method. Math Probl Eng 70(2):717–718Google Scholar
- Na TY (1979) Computational methods in engineering boundary value problems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Nazar R, Amin N, Pop I (2004) Unsteady mixed convection boundary-layer flow near the stagnation point on a vertical surface in a porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Tran 47(12–13):2681–2688View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Postelnicu A, Pop I (2011) Falkner–Skan boundary layer flow of a power-law fluid past a stretching wedge. Appl Math Comput 217(9):4359–4368View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salama AA (2004) Higher order method for solving free boundary-value problems. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam 45(4):385–394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang GC (2003) Existence of solutions to the third-order nonlinear differential equations arising in boundary layer theory. Aplpl Math Lett 16(3):827–832View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang GC, Hu JC (2008) Numerical results of a singular boundary value problems related with mixed convection equation arising in boundary layer. Nonlinear Anal Forum 1(1):103–108Google Scholar