Open Access

Performance rating of the transmuted exponential distribution: an analytical approach

  • Enahoro A. Owoloko1,
  • Pelumi E. Oguntunde1Email author and
  • Adebowale O. Adejumo2
SpringerPlus20154:818

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1590-6

Received: 10 September 2015

Accepted: 4 December 2015

Published: 24 December 2015

Abstract

In this article, the so called Transmuted Exponential (TE) distribution was applied to two real life datasets to assess its potential flexibility over some other generalized models. Various statistical properties of the TE distribution were also identified while the method of maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate the model parameters.

Keywords

EstimationFlexibilityMaximum likelihood estimationPropertiesTransmuted Exponential

Background

Attempts to generalize the Exponential distribution have led to the developement of Beta Exponential distribution (Nadarajah and Kotz 2006), Kumaraswamy Exponential distribution (Cordeiro and de Castro 2011), Generalized Exponential distribution (Gupta and Kundu 1999, 2007) and Exponentiated Exponential distribution (Gupta 2001). These distributions have been found to be more flexibly than the Exponential distribution when applied to real life data sets.

Let X denotes a random variable, the probability density function (pdf) and the cumulative density function (cdf) of an Exponential distribution with parameter θ can be defined using an alternative parameterization as;
$$g\left( x \right) = \frac{1}{\theta }e^{{{-}\left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} ;\quad\,x \ge ,\,\theta \text{ > }0$$
(1)
and
$$G\left( x \right) = 1{-}\frac{1}{\theta }e^{{{-}\left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} ;\quad\,x \ge 0,\,\theta \text{ > }0$$
(2)
respectively.

where; θ is the scale parameter

Several generalized families of distributions have been proposed in the literature, for instance, the β-G; (Eugene et al. 2002), Kumaraswamy-G; (Cordeiro and de Castro 2011), Transmuted family of distributions; (Shaw and Buckley 2007), Gamma-G (type 1); (Zografos and Balakrishnan 2009), McDonald-G; (Alexander et al. 2012), Gamma-G (type 2); (Ristic et al. 2012), Gamma-G (type 3); (Torabi and Montazari 2012), Log-gamma-G; Amini et al. (2012), Exponentiated T-X; Alzaghal et al. (2013), Exponentiated-G (EG); (Cordeiro et al. 2013), Logistic-G; Torabi and Montazari (2014), Gamma-X; (Alzaatreh et al. 2013), Logistic-X; (Tahir et al. 2015), Weibull-X; (Alzaatreh et al. 2013), Weibull-G; (Bourguignon et al. 2014) and Beta Marshall-Olkin family of distributions; (Alizadeh et al. 2015) and many others are available in the literature.

Of interest to us in this article is the Transmuted family of distribution which was obtained using the quadratic rank transmutation map. The transmuted family of distributions has been adopted by several notable authors to generalize known theoretical models, the Transmuted Weibull distribution; Aryal and Tsokos (2011), Transmuted Rayleigh distribution; (Merovci 2013), Transmuted Exponentiated Modified Weibull distribution; (Ashour and Eltehiwy 2013a), Transmuted Modified Weibull distribution; Khan and King (2013), Transmuted Lomax distribution; (Ashour and Eltehiwy 2013b), Transmuted Exponentiated Gamma distribution; Hussian (2014), Transmuted Inverse Rayleigh distribution; Ahmad et al. (2014), Transmuted Pareto distribution; (Merovci and Puka 2014), Transmuted Inverse Weibull distribution; (Khan et al. 2014), Transmuted Modified Inverse Weibull Distribution; (Elbatal 2013), Transmuted Additive Weibull distribution; (Elbatal and Aryal 2013), Transmuted Complementary Weibull Geometric Distribution; (Afify et al. 2014), Transmuted Inverse Exponential distribution; (Oguntunde and Adejumo 2015), Transmuted Size-Biased Exponential distribution; Ahmad et al. (2015) and Transmuted Gompertz distribution; (Abdul-Moniem and Seham 2015); are some known examples in the literature.

The aim of this article is to obtain the Transmuted Exponential (TE) distribution as a special case of Transmuted Weibull distribution following the content of Aryal and Tsokos (2011) and to assess its flexibility over some other generalized models using real life data sets.

The rest of this article is organized as follows; in "The Transmuted Exponential (TE) distribution: existing and more results", the TE distribution, its properties and various statistical properties are discussed, real life applications with respect to some other well-known generalized models shall be discussed in "Application", followed by concluding remark. The R-code for the analysis is provided as “Appendix”.

The Transmuted Exponential (TE) distribution: existing and more results

A random variable X is said to have a transmuted distribution function if its pdf and cdf are respectively given by;
$$f\left( x \right) = g\left( x \right)\left[ {1 + \lambda - 2\lambda G\left( x \right)} \right]$$
(3)
$$F\left( x \right) = \left( {1 + \lambda } \right)G\left( x \right) - \lambda \left[ {G\left( x \right)} \right]^{2}$$
(4)
where; x > 0, and \(\left| \lambda \right| \le 1\) is the transmuted parameter

G(x) is the cdf of the baseline distribution.

f(x) and g(x) are the associated pdf of F(x) and G(x), respectively.

When λ = 0; Eqs. (3) and (4) reduces to the baseline distribution.

If the parameter η = 1 in Eqs. (4) and (5) of Aryal and Tsokos (2011), we have the pdf and the cdf of the TE distribution as;
$$f\left( x \right) = \frac{1}{\theta }e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} \left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]$$
(5)
and;
$$F\left( x \right) = \left[ {1 - e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]\left[ {1 + \lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]$$
(6)

Respectively.

For x > 0, θ > 0, \(\left| {\lambda \le 1} \right|\)

where;

θ is the scale parameter

λ is the transmuted parameter

Special case

For λ = 0, Eq. (5) reduces to give the pdf of the Exponential distribution. Some possible plots for the pdf of the TE distribution at some selected parameter values are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3 4, 5 and 6;
Fig. 1

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 0.5, λ = 0.5)

Fig. 2

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 2, λ = 0.9)

Fig. 3

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 2, λ = −0.9)

Fig. 4

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 3, λ = −0.9)

Fig. 5

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 2, λ = − 0.5)

Fig. 6

Plot for the pdf of TE distribution at (θ = 0.5, λ = − 0.5)

Depending on the parameter values, it can be observed from the figures above that the shape of the TE distribution could be decreasing, or inverted bathtub (unimodal). It should also be noted that \(\left| \lambda \right| \le 1\).

Moments of the Transmuted Exponential distribution

Let X denote a continuous random variable, the rth moment is given by;
$$E\left( {X^{r} } \right) = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {x^{r} } f\left( x \right)dx$$
Therefore, the rth moment of the TE distribution can be derived from;
$$E\left( {X^{r} } \right) = \int\limits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {x^{r} } \frac{1}{\theta }e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} \left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]dx$$
(7)
This can be obtained directly from Eq. (6) of 8 when η = 1 as;
$$E\left( {X^{r} } \right) = \theta^{r} \varGamma \left( {1 + r} \right)\left\{ {1 - \lambda + \lambda 2^{ - r} } \right\}$$
(8)
This can further be expressed as;
$$E\left( {X^{r} } \right) = \theta^{r} r!\left\{ {1 - \lambda + \lambda 2^{ - r} } \right\}$$
(9)
It is obvious that for r = 1;
$$E\left( X \right) = \theta \left( {\frac{2 - \lambda }{2}} \right)$$
(10)
Other higher order moments can be derived at r > 1 from Eq. (9). The table of values (at selected values) for the mean of TE distribution is provided in Table 1
Table 1

Table of means for the Transmuted Exponential distribution

 

λ = −0.1

λ = −0.4

λ = −0.7

λ = −1.0

λ = 0

λ = 0.1

λ = 0.4

λ = 0.7

λ = 1.0

θ = 1

1.05

1.20

1.35

1.50

1.00

0.95

0.80

0.65

0.50

θ = 2

2.10

2.40

2.70

3.00

2.00

1.90

1.60

1.30

1.00

θ = 3

3.15

3.60

4.05

4.50

3.00

2.85

2.40

1.95

1.50

θ = 4

4.20

4.80

5.40

6.00

4.00

3.80

3.20

2.60

2.00

θ = 5

5.25

6.00

6.75

7.50

5.00

4.75

4.00

3.25

2.50

θ = 6

6.30

7.20

8.10

9.00

6.00

5.70

4.80

3.90

3.00

θ = 7

7.35

8.40

9.45

10.50

7.00

6.65

5.60

4.55

3.50

θ = 8

8.40

9.60

10.80

12.00

8.00

7.60

6.40

5.20

4.00

θ = 9

9.45

10.80

12.15

13.50

9.00

8.55

7.20

5.85

4.50

θ = 10

10.50

12.00

13.50

15.00

10.00

9.50

8.00

6.50

5.00

.

Quantile function and median of the Transmuted Exponential distribution

The quantile function x q of the TE distribution can be obtained as the inverse of Eq. (6) and in particular, when η = 1 in Eq. (7) of (Aryal and Tsokos (2011)) as;
$$x_{q} = \theta \left[ { - \ln \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{1 + \lambda - \sqrt {\left( {1 + \lambda } \right)^{2} - 4\lambda q} }}{2\lambda }} \right)} \right\}} \right]$$
(11)
The median of the TE distribution can be obtained from Eq. (11) at q = 0.5 as;
$$x_{0.5} = \theta \left[ { - \ln \left( {\frac{{\lambda - 1 + \sqrt {1 + \lambda^{2} } }}{2\lambda }} \right)} \right]$$
(12)

The lower quartile and upper quartile can also be derived from Eq. (11) when q = 0.25 and q = 0.75 respectively.

Random numbers from the TE distribution can be generated using the method of inversion;
$$X = \theta \left[ { - \ln \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{1 + \lambda - \sqrt {\left( {1 + \lambda } \right)^{2} - 4\lambda u} }}{2\lambda }} \right)} \right\}} \right]$$
(13)
where; u  U(0, 1).

Reliability analysis of the Transmuted Exponential distribution

Mathematically, the survival function is given by;
$$S\left( x \right) = 1 - F\left( x \right)$$
(14)
Therefore, the survival function for the TE distribution can be simplified to give;
$$S\left( x \right) = \lambda e^{{ - 2\left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} - \left( {\lambda - 1} \right)e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}}$$
(15)
The hazard function is mathematically given by;
$$h\left( x \right) = \frac{f\left( x \right)}{1 - F\left( x \right)}$$
(16)
Therefore, the expression for the hazard function (or failure rate) of the TE distribution is given by;
$$h\left( x \right) = \frac{{\frac{1}{\theta }\left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}}{{\left[ {\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{x}{\theta }} \right)}} + 1 - \lambda } \right]}}$$
(17)
Some possible plots for the failure rate of the TE distribution at some selected parameter values are shown in Figs. 7, 8, 9 and 10;
Fig. 7

Plot for the hazard function of TE distribution at (θ = 0.5, λ = 0.5)

Fig. 8

Plot for the hazard function of TE distribution at (θ = 0.5, λ = − 0.5)

Fig. 9

Plot for the hazard function of TE distribution at (θ = 2, λ = 0.9)

Fig. 10

Plot for the hazard function of TE distribution at (θ = 2, λ = −0.9)

Parameter estimation and inference for the Transmuted Exponential distribution

We make use of the method of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to estimate the parameters of the TE distribution. Let X 1X 2, …, X n be a sample of size ‘n’ from the TE distribution, the likelihood function is given by;
$$L\left( {X_{1} ,X_{2} , \ldots ,X_{n} |\theta ,\lambda } \right) = \left( {\frac{1}{\theta }} \right)^{n} e^{{{{-}}\sum\limits_{{i{\text{-}}1}}^{n} {\left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)} }} \prod\limits_{{i = 1}}^{n} {\left[ {1{{-}}\lambda {\text{ + }}2\lambda e^{{{{-}}\left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}$$
Let l = log L;
$$l = n\log \left( {\frac{1}{\theta }} \right) - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\log \left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}$$
Therefore;
$$l = - n\log \theta - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)} + \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\log \left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}$$
Differentiating l with respect to θ and λ respectively gives;
$$\frac{\partial l}{\partial \theta } = - \frac{n}{\theta }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\left[ {1 - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)} \right]} + \frac{2\lambda }{\theta }\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{{\left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} }}{{\left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}}}$$
(18)
$$\frac{\partial l}{\partial \lambda } = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{{2e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} - 1}}{{\left[ {1 - \lambda + 2\lambda e^{{ - \left( {\frac{{x_{i} }}{\theta }} \right)}} } \right]}}}$$
(19)

Equating Eqs. (18) and (19) to zero and solving the resulting nonlinear system of equations gives the maximum likelihood estimates of parameters θ and λ.

We obtain the 2 × 2 observed information matrix through;
$$\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\hat{\theta }} \\ {\hat{\lambda }} \\ \end{array} } \right)\sim N\left[ {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} \theta \\ \lambda \\ \end{array} } \right),\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\hat{V}_{{11}} } & {\hat{V}_{{12}} } \\ {\hat{V}_{{21}} } & {\hat{V}_{{22}} } \\ \end{array} } \right)} \right]$$
where;
$$V^{ - 1} = - E\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{\partial^{2} l}}{{\partial \theta^{2} }}} & {\frac{{\partial^{2} l}}{\partial \theta \partial \lambda }} \\ {\frac{{\partial^{2} l}}{\partial \theta \partial \lambda }} & {\frac{{\partial^{2} l}}{{\partial \lambda^{2} }}} \\ \end{array} } \right]$$
(20)
The solution of the inverse matrix of the observed information matrix in Eq. (20) gives the asymptotic variance and co-variance of the maximum likelihood estimators \(\hat{\theta }\) and \(\hat{\lambda }\). The approximate \(100 \,(1\;{ - }\;\alpha ) \;\%\) asymptotic confidence interval (CI) for θ and λ are given by;
$$\hat{\theta }\; \pm \;Z_{{\alpha /2}} \sqrt {\hat{V}_{{11}} } ;\quad \hat{\lambda } \pm \;Z_{{\alpha /2}} \sqrt {\hat{V}_{{22}} }$$
(21)
where; \(Z_{\alpha/2}\) is the α-th percentile of the standard normal distribution.

Application

The models to be compared in this section include the TE distribution, Beta Exponential distribution, Generalized Exponential Distribution and the Exponentiated Exponential distribution. The analyses were performed with the aid of R software.

Data Set I. The first data represents the life of fatigue fracture of Kevlar 373/epoxy subjected to constant pressure at 90 % stress level until all had failed. The data was extracted from (Abdul-Moniem and Seham 2015) and it has previously been used by Barlow et al. (1984). The data is as follows;

0.0251, 0.0886, 0.0891, 0.2501, 0.3113, 0.3451, 0.4763, 0.5650, 0.5671, 0.6566, 0.6748, 0.6751, 0.6753, 0.7696, 0.8375, 0.8391, 0.8425, 0.8645, 0.8851, 0.9113, 0.9120, 0.9836, 1.0483, 1.0596, 1.0773, 1.1733, 1.2570, 1.2766, 1.2985, 1.3211, 1.3503, 1.3551, 1.4595, 1.4880, 1.5728, 1.5733, 1.7083, 1.7263, 1.7460, 1.7630, 1.7746, 1.8275, 1.8375, 1.8503, 1.8808, 1.8878, 1.8881, 1.9316, 1.9558, 2.0048, 2.0408, 2.0903, 2.1093, 2.1330, 2.2100, 2.2460, 2.2878, 2.3203, 2.3470, 2.3513, 2.4951, 2.5260, 2.9911, 3.0256, 3.2678, 3.4045, 3.4846, 3.7433, 3.7455, 3.9143, 4.8073, 5.4005, 5.4435, 5.5295, 6.5541, 9.0960.

The summary of the data is provided in Table 2;
Table 2

Summary of data on fatigue fracture of Kevlar 373/epoxy at 90 % stress level (to four decimal places)

Min.

Q1

Q2

Q3

Mean

Max.

Variance

Skewness

Kurtosis

0.0251

0.9048

1.7360

2.2960

1.9590

9.0960

2.4774

1.9406

8.1608

The performance of the Transmuted Exponential distribution with respect to the Beta Exponential, Generalized Exponential and Exponentiated Exponential distributions using the data on fatigue fracture is given in Table 3.
Table 3

Performance rating of selected models

Distributions

Estimates

Log-likelihood

AIC

Transmuted Exponential (θλ)

θ = 1.3763, λ = −0.8487

−121.5166

247.0331

Beta Exponential (abθ)

a = 1.6797, b = 1.5085, θ = 0.4849

−122.2275

250.4551

Generalized Exponential (aθ)

a = 1.70949, θ = 0.70279

−122.2436

248.4872

Exponentiated Exponential (aθ)

a = 39.969318, θ = 0.012770

−127.1143

258.2287

Data Set II. The second data set represents the monthly actual taxes revenue (in 1000 million Egyptian pounds) in Egypt between January 2006 and November 2010. The data was extracted from Nassar and Nada (2011). The data is as follows;

5.9, 20.4, 14.9, 16.2, 17.2, 7.8, 6.1, 9.2, 10.2, 9.6, 13.3, 8.5, 21.6, 18.5, 5.1, 6.7, 17, 8.6, 9.7, 39.2, 35.7, 15.7, 9.7, 10, 4.1, 36, 8.5, 8, 9.2, 26.2, 21.9, 16.7, 21.3, 35.4, 14.3, 8.5, 10.6, 19.1, 20.5, 7.1, 7.7, 18.1, 16.5, 11.9, 7, 8.6, 12.5, 10.3, 11.2, 6.1, 8.4, 11, 11.6, 11.9, 5.2, 6.8, 8.9, 7.1, 10.8.

The summary of the data is provided in Table 4.
Table 4

Summary of data on tax revenue (to two decimal places)

Min.

Q1

Q2

Q3

Mean

Max.

Variance

Skewness

Kurtosis

4.10

8.45

10.60

16.85

13.49

39.20

64.83

1.57

5.26

The performance of the Transmuted Exponential distribution with respect to the Beta Exponential distribution, Generalized Exponential distribution and the Exponentiated Exponential distribution is as shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Performance rating of selected models

Distributions

Estimates

Log-likelihood

AIC

Transmuted Exponential (θλ)

θ = 3.862 × 105λ = 9.389 × 10−4

−83.44494

170.8899

Beta Exponential (abθ)

a = 63.52239, b = 0.16957, θ = 0.76882

−187.9398

381.8795

Generalized Exponential (aθ)

a = 5.53040, θ = 0.17867

−191.2235

386.4471

Exponentiated Exponential (aθ)

a = 11.755728, θ = 0.006307

−212.5068

429.0136

Discussion

The model corresponding to the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) or the highest Log-likelihood value is regarded as the ‘best’ model. In this case, the TE distribution has the lowest AIC value with 247.0331 and 170.8899 respectively. Also, it has the highest value of Log-likelihood of −121.5166 and −83.44494 respectively. Hence, it can be regarded as a better model for the data used.

Conclusion

This article studies the performance of the TE distribution with respect to some other generalized models. The shape of the TE distribution could be decreasing or unimodal (depending on the value of the parameters). The TE distribution appeared to be better than the Beta Exponential distribution, Generalized Exponential distribution and the Exponentiated Exponential distribution in terms of flexibility when applied two real life data. The criteria used are the Log-likelihood value and the AIC.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

OPE is a research student in the Department of Mathematics, Covenant University under the supervision of Dr. AOA and Dr. EAO. He developed the idea that led to this article. The supervisors guided, read through and all agreed with the results and findings. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the anonymous referees for their useful and timely comments towards improving the quality of this paper. The financial support from Covenant University is also deeply appreciated.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Covenant University
(2)
Department of Statistics, University of Ilorin

References

  1. Abdul-Moniem IB, Seham M (2015) Transmuted Gompertz distribution. Comput Appl Math J 1(3):88–96Google Scholar
  2. Afify AZ, Nofal ZM, Butt NS (2014) Transmuted complementary Weibull geometric distribution. Pak J Stat Operation Res 10(4):435–454View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad A, Ahmad SP, Ahmed A (2014) Transmuted Inverse Rayleigh distribution: a generalization of the Inverse Rayleigh distribution. Math Theory Model 4(7):90–98Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad K, Ahmad SP, Ahmed A (2015) On new method of estimation of parameters of transmuted size-biased exponential distribution and its structural properties. Int J Innov Res Stud 4(3):1–12Google Scholar
  5. Alexander C, Cordeiro GM, Ortega EMM, Sarabia JM (2012) Generalized beta-generated distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:1880–1897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Alizadeh M, Cordeiro GM, de Brito E, Demetrio CGB (2015) The beta Marshall-Olkin family of distributions. J Stat Distrib Appl 2(4):1–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Alzaatreh A, Famoye F, Lee C (2013) Weibull–Pareto distribution and its applications. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 42(9):1673–1691View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Alzaghal A, Lee C, Famoye F (2013) Exponentiated T-X family of distributions with some applications. Int J Probab Stat 2:31–49View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Amini M, MirMostafaee SMTK, Ahmadi J (2012) Log-gamma-generated families of distributions. Statistics. doi:10.1008/02331888.2012.748775 Google Scholar
  10. Aryal GR, Tsokos CP (2011) Transmuted Weibull distribution: a genaralization of the Weibull probability distribution. Eur J Pure Appl Math 4:89–102Google Scholar
  11. Ashour SK, Eltehiwy MA (2013a) Transmuted exponentiated modified Weibull distribution. Int J Basic Appl Sci 2(3):258–269Google Scholar
  12. Ashour SK, Eltehiwy MA (2013b) Transmuted Lomax distribution. Am J Appl Math Stat 1(6):121–127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Barlow RE, Toland RH and Freeman T (1984) A Bayesian analysis of stress rupture life of Kevlar 49/epoxy spherical pressure vessels, In: Procedings. conference on applications of statistics, Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourguignon M, Silva RB, Cordeiro GM (2014) The Weibull-G family of probability distributions. J Data Sci 12:53–68Google Scholar
  15. Cordeiro GM, de Castro M (2011) A New family of generalized distributions. J Stat Comput Simul 81:883–898View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cordeiro GM, Ortega EMM, da Cunha DCC (2013) The exponentiated generalized class of distribution. J Data Sci 11:1–27Google Scholar
  17. Elbatal I (2013) Transmuted modified inverse Weibull Distribution: a generalization of the modified inverse Weibull probability distribution. Int J Math Arch 4(8):117–129Google Scholar
  18. Elbatal I, Aryal G (2013) On the transmuted additive Weibull distribution. Aust J Stat 42(2):117–132Google Scholar
  19. Eugene N, Lee C, Famoye F (2002) Beta-normal distribution and its applications. Commun Stat: Theory Methods 31:497–512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta RD (2001) Exponentiated exponential family; an alternative to gamma and Weibull. Biometrical J 33:117–130View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta RD, Kundu D (1999) Generalized exponential distributions. Aust N Z J Stat 41:173–188View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta RD, Kundu D (2007) Generalized exponential distribution: existing methods and recent developments. J Stat Plann Inference 137:3537–3547View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hussian MA (2014) Transmuted exponentiated gamma distribution; a generalization of the exponentiated gamma probability distribution. Appl Math Sci 8(27):1297–1310Google Scholar
  24. Khan MS, King R (2013) Transmuted modified Weibull distribution: a generalization of the modified Weibull probbility distribution. Eur J Pure Appl Math 6:66–88Google Scholar
  25. Khan MS, King R, Hudson I (2014) Characteristics of the transmuted inverse Weibull distribution. ANZIAM J. 55(EMAC2013):C197–C217Google Scholar
  26. Merovci F (2013) The transmuted rayleigh distribution. Aust J Stat 22(1):21–30Google Scholar
  27. Merovci F, Puka I (2014) Transmuted pareto distribution. ProbStat Forum 07:1–11Google Scholar
  28. Nadarajah S, Kotz S (2006) The Beta exponential distribution. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 91(6):689–697View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nassar MM, Nada NK (2011) The beta generalized pareto distribution. J Stat: Adv Theory Appl 6(1/2):1–17Google Scholar
  30. Oguntunde PE, Adejumo AO (2015) The transmuted inverse exponential distribution. Int J Adv Stat Probab 3(1):1–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Risti´c, Miroslav M, Balakrishnan N (2012) The gamma-exponentiated exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Simulation 82:1191–1206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw WT, Buckley IR (2007) The alchemy of probability distributions: beyond Gram-Charlier expansions and a skew-kurtotic-normal distribution from a rank transmutation map. Research reportGoogle Scholar
  33. Tahir MH, Cordeiro GM, Alzaatreh A, Mansoor M, Zubair M (2015) The logistic-X family of distributions and its applications. Commun Stat-Theory Methods (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  34. Torabi H, Montazari NH (2012) The gamma-uniform distribution and its application. Kybernetika 48:16–30Google Scholar
  35. Torabi H, Montazari NH (2014) The logistic-uniform distribution and its application. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 43:2551–2569View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Zografos K, Balakrishnan N (2009) On families of beta- and generalized gamma-generated distributions and associated inference. Stat Methodol 6:344–362View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Owoloko et al. 2015