Open Access

Levels of major and trace elements in fennel (Foeniculum vulgari Mill.) fruits cultivated in Ethiopia

  • Feleke Demissie Endalamaw4, 5 and
  • Bhagwan Singh Chandravanshi4Email author
SpringerPlus20154:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-5

Received: 19 August 2014

Accepted: 16 December 2014

Published: 3 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) is one of the precious spices. Almost all parts of fennel plant are edible. The herb is used as carminative, digestive, diuretic, cosmetic and medicine.

Methods

A 0.5 g of the oven dried fennel fruit and soil samples were digested by wet-digestion method. The levels of selected elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr, Co, Zn, Ni, Cd and Pb) were determined in sweet fennel fruit (Foeniculum vulgari Mill.) and soil from Addis Ababa (Central Ethiopia) and Gojjam (Northern West Ethiopia) by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS).

Results

The elemental concentrations (μg/g) in fennel fruit were: Ca (20,500–23,000), Mg (1,310–3,460), Fe (1,140–1,900), Mn (31–51), Cu (24–103), Cr (91–98), Co (26–71), Zn (37–45), Ni (19–24), and Cd (1.6–1.9) while in the soil were: Ca (1,440–1,780), Mg (1,260–3,310), Fe (26,900–28,000), Mn (1,460–1,980), Cu (51–101), Cr (127–141), Co (54–143), Zn (99–104), Ni (98–161), and Cd (1.7–2.9). Pb was below the method detection limit in both the fennel fruit and soil.

Conclusion

The Ethiopian fennel fruits are rich in Ca and Mg and other essential elements (Fe, Cu, Co and Zn) and can be used as good supplement for human being in particularly for children and pregnant women. The toxic element Cd is at trace level and Pb is not detected in the fennel fruit. Thus, Ethiopian fennel fruits are safe for human consumption.

Keywords

Fennel Foeniculum vulgari Mill. Ensilal Trace elements Spice Ethiopia

Introduction

Sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) is one of the precious spices. It is a highly aromatic (Parthasarathy et al. 2008) and flavourful herb with culinary, cosmetic (Rasul et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2004) and medicinal uses (Javidnia et al. 2003; He and Huang 2011; Cetin et al. 2010; Faudale et al. 2008; Mohamad et al. 2011; Qiu et al. 2012; Senatore et al. 2013; Shahat et al. 2011; Dadalioglu and Evrendilek 2004). It has also nutritional values (Renna and Gonnella 2012). It belongs to the family Apiaceae (formerly the Umbelliferae) (Qiu et al. 2012). In Ethiopia, the plant is called Ensilal. It is native to Southern Europe and the Mediterranean region and is cultivated mainly in India, China, Guatemala, Sri Lanka, Greece, and many other countries in Europe and America (Parthasarathy et al. 2008; He and Huang 2011; Rather et al. 2012; Rahimi and Ardekani 2013; Chéry et al. 2008). As to our knowledge, it is cultivated only in Ethiopia in Africa.

Almost all parts of fennel plant are edible. The herb is used as carminative, digestive, and diuretic. It is used in treating respiratory and gastrointestinal disorders (Diao et al. 2014; El-Motaium and El-Seoud 2007). Furthermore, its insect rippling and antimicrobial properties against a wide range of microorganisms have been well established (Qiu et al. 2012; Oktay et al. 2003). Fennel essential oil is used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and perfumery and as a food additive and flavouring agent in food products (Kim et al. 2004; Mohamad et al. 2011; Rather et al. 2012; Oktay et al. 2003). The fennel fruits are used as flavourings in baked goods, meat and fish dishes, ice cream, alcoholic beverages and herb mixtures. Fennel fruit tea and fennel fruit water are very common traditional medicines for flatulence treatment (He and Huang 2011; Rather et al. 2012). In China, fennel fruit is used both as tradition Chinese medicine and as common food with Chinese name Xiaohuixiang (He and Huang 2011).

There are various demands for elemental information in biological and medical samples. Trace elements exhibit significant functions with respect to living organisms in terms of oxygen carrying, electron transfer, enzyme catalyzing, etc. (Singh and Garg 2006; Divrikli et al. 2006; Demirel et al. 2008). For all the elements essential for metabolism, there exists a range of intake over which their supply is adequate for the body beyond which deficiency and toxic effects are observed (Mallinckrodt and Meissne 1994). All the nutrient elements are primarily supplied through diet. However, this may change, depending on age, sex, health status, geographical and climatic conditions (O'Dell and Sunde 1997). Therefore, it is essential to determine elemental contents of food items. WHO and FAO have recommended selective studies of individual foodstuffs as an important step in the estimation of dietary intake of trace elements (FAO/WHO 2001). It is a good practice to include micronutrient density of the diet component in addition to energy and protein adequacy of it (FAO/WHO 2001).

There are some works done on the elemental level of infusion and decoction tea (Desideri et al. 2011; Ozcan et al. 2008; Szymczycha-Madeja et al. 2012; Sembratowicz and Rusinek-prystupa 2014; Başgel and Erdemoğlu 2006; Zengin et al. 2008) of the fennel fruit, steam and leaf. Fennel fruit is eaten cooked or raw in different part of the world. Chewing fennel fruit after a meal is a common practice in India (Shirahatt et al. 2010). Ethiopians use raw or roasted and ground form of it as spice. It is also used to flavor local drinks such as areke and tej. Moreover, in Ethiopia the fennel fruit is used as a spice in the preparation of shiro and berbere and the powdered roasted fennel fruit is added in to traditional dish like doro wot (Getahun 1976; Zuberi et al. 2014). There is no report on the elemental content of fennel fruit in Ethiopia in any form and only few reports (Khattak and Khattak 2011; Chowdhary et al. 2014; Ozcan and Akbulut 2007; Kumar et al. 2005) are available worldwide on the total elemental content of the fennel fruit. None of them correlate the nutrient found in the fennel fruit with the soil it is grown. This study was therefore; designed to assess the levels of major and trace elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr, Co, Zn, Ni, Cd and Pb) in fennel fruit cultivated in the farmland in Ethiopia. To assess the significance of soil to the growth of fennel, it was also analysed for major and trace elements using flame atomic absorption spectrometry.

Methods

Instruments and reagents

Blending device (Moulinex, France), digital analytical balance (Adam, Model WL 3000, Switzerland), hot plate, air-circulating oven (Digitheat, J.P. Selecta, Spain) and flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS) (Buck Scientific, Model 210VGP AAS, East Norwalk, USA) were used.

Chemicals and reagents that were used in the analysis were all analytical grades. 69–72% HNO3 (Supreme Enterprises Cantt, India), 70% HClO4 (A.C.S. Reagent, Aldrich, UK) and 36% H2O2 (Scharlau Chemie, European Union, UN2014) were used for digestion of powdered fennel fruit and soil samples. Lanthanum nitrate hydrate (99.9%, Aldrich, Muwaukee, USA) was used to prevent the chemical interference of phosphate ion on Ca and Mg during the analysis of the samples. Stock standard solution of concentration 1000 mg/L in 2% HNO3 of the elements Ca, Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Ni, Co, Cr, Pb and Cd (Buck Scientific Puro-Graphic) standard solutions were used to prepare intermediate standard solutions to obtain calibration curves for the determination of elements in the samples and recovery study.

Sampling and sample preparation

The study locations were Addis Ababa, Bichena, Debre Markos and Finote Selam. Addis Ababa is the capital city of Ethiopia. Bichena and Debre Markos are located in east Gojjam (Ethiopia); they are 299 km and 265 km from Addis Ababa, respectively. Finote Selam is found in west Gojjam, which is 380 km away from the capital city. Addis Ababa was selected because it is expected to be relatively contaminated area and to see the accumulation effect of the plant. Gojjam was selected because fennel is consumed in these zones every day in different ways, as spice, flavouring agent in local areki and used as medicinal plant. Latitude, longitude, altitude, annual average temperature and rainfall of the sampling sites of fennel fruit are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Latitude, longitude, altitude, annual average temperature and annual rain fall of the sites

Name of sites

Latitude (N)

Longitude (E)

Altitude (m)

Annual average temperature (°C)

Annual average rain fall (mm)

AA

8°59′

38°48′

2,354

12-20

1,210

B

10°27′

38°12′

2,539

9.8-22

1,250

DM

10°21′

37°43′

2,440

14.2-18.6

1,340

FS

10°42′

37°16′

1,905

9.8-23.5

1,450

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos and FS = Finote Selam.

Fennel fruit samples were collected during the dry season (March – April 2010). A total of 5 sub-sites were selected for each site and 100 g fennel fruit and 100 g soil were collected from each sub-site. The sub-sites were selected randomly. The samples collected in each sub-sites were pooled and 0.5 kg of bulk sample were collected for each of the sites. The soil samples were collected at a depth of 20 cm from the surface of the top soil. Samples were sealed in polyethylene bags and transported to the laboratory. All the samples were dried in the oven at 70°C for 48 hours for fennel fruit and 72 hours for soil until the mass of the samples became constant.

Optimization of digestion procedure

In this study nitric and perchloric acids were used during optimization procedure for fennel fruit and a total volume of acid was taken to be 4 mL. The ratio of the acids, temperature and time of digestion were optimized. The results are given in Table 2. Therefore, the procedure with total of 4 mL reagents volume (2.5 mL HNO3 and 1.5 mL HClO4), heating at 210°C and 150 min digestion time was selected for this study. Similar optimization also carried out for the soil sample digestion using HNO3, HClO4 and H2O2. The results are given in Table 3. The optimum condition obtained was 2 mL HNO3 (69–72%), 4 mL HClO4 (70%) and 1.5 mL of H2O2 (36%) and at temperature 270°C for 180 min. The solid dry sample (for both soil and fennel fruit) digested by this procedure was 0.5 g.
Table 2

Reagent types and volumes, temperature and time attempted during optimization of digestion of 0.5 g fennel fruit

No.

Reagent volume (mL)

Temperature (°C)

Time (min)

Results

 

HNO3

HClO4

Total

   

1

1

3

4

270

180

Yellow

2

1.5

2.5

4

270

180

Lightly yellow

3

2

2

4

270

180

Almost clear

4

2.5

1.5

4

270

180

Clear solution

5

3

1

4

270

180

Clear solution

6

3.5

0.5

4

270

180

Almost clear

7

2.5

1.5

4

120

180

Yellow

8

2.5

1.5

4

150

180

Lightly yellow

9

2.5

1.5

4

180

180

Almost clear

10

2.5

1.5

4

210

180

Clear solution

11

2.5

1.5

4

240

180

Clear solution

12

2.5

1.5

4

270

180

Clear solution

13

2.5

1.5

4

270

105

Light brown with suspension

14

2.5

1.5

4

270

120

Yellow

15

2.5

1.5

4

270

135

Lightly yellow

16

2.5

1.5

4

270

150

Clear solution

17

2.5

1.5

4

270

165

Clear solution

18

2.5

1.5

4

270

180

Clear solution

Rows with bold font indicate the optimal condition for the given parameter.

Table 3

Reagent types and volumes, temperature and time attempted during optimization of digestion of 0.5 g soil

No.

Reagent volume (mL)

Temperature (°C)

Time (min)

Results

 

HNO3

HClO4

H2O2

   

1

2.2

4.4

1

300

180

Deep yellow with suspension

2

2

4

1.5

300

180

Light yellow with no suspension

3

1.8

3.6

2

300

180

Light yellow with no suspension

4

2

4

1.5

240

180

Deep yellow with suspension

5

2

4

1.5

270

180

Light yellow with no suspension

6

2

4

1.5

300

180

Light yellow with no suspension

7

2

4

1.5

270

120

Deep Yellow with suspension

8

2

4

1.5

270

150

Light yellow with suspension

9

2

4

1.5

270

180

Light yellow with no suspension

Rows with bold font indicate the optimal condition for the given parameter.

Fennel fruit samples were digested by applying the optimized procedure. A 0.5 g of well-powdered fennel fruit sample was added into a round bottom flask (100 mL). To this flask 2.5 mL HNO3 (69–72%) and 1.5 mL HClO4 (70%) were added and the mixtures were digested on a micro Kjeldahl digestion apparatus by setting the temperature at 210°C for 150 min.

Soil samples were digested by applying the optimized procedure. A 0.5 g of well-powdered soil sample was added into a round bottom flask (100 mL). To this flask 2 mL HNO3 (69–72%), 4 mL HClO4 (70%) and 1.5 mL of H2O2 (36%) were added and the mixtures were digested on a micro Kjeldahl digestion apparatus by setting the temperature at 270°C for 180 min.

After cooling of the digest, about 15 mL of de-ionized water was added to dissolve the precipitates formed on cooling and to dilute left over acid so that to minimize the dissolution of a filter paper by the digest residue while filtrating with Whatman, (110 mm, dia), filter paper. The round bottom flask was rinsed by using 8 mL de-ionized water two times and filtered. The filtrate was filled to 50 mL with de-ionized water. Triplicate digestions were carried out for each sample of soil and fennel fruit. Six blank solutions were prepared by digesting the mixture of reagents following the same procedure. The digested samples were kept in the refrigerator, until the level of all the elements in the sample solutions were determined by FAAS.

Instrument calibration

Six points calibration curve were established by running series of the prepared working standard solutions. Correlation coefficients obtained for calibration curve were > 0.999. Immediately after calibration, the sample solutions were aspirated into the FAAS instrument and direct readings of the elemental concentrations was recorded. Calibration of the instrument was checked periodically during operation. Three replicate determinations were carried out on each sample. Blank analysis was also done similarly.

Method validation

The method detection limit of each element was calculated as tree times the standard deviation of the blank (3σblank, n = 6). The method detection limit for fennel fruit and soil samples are presented in Table 4. The method detection limits are low enough which clearly indicate that the selected elements can be detected at trace level by the FAAS method used.
Table 4

Method detection limits for elements (for all metals, n = 6)

Element

Ca

Mg

Mn

Fe

Zn

Cu

Cr

Co

Ni

Cd

Pb

MDL for fennel fruit (μg/g)

3

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.6

0.5

3

4

1

0.1

5

MDL for soil (μg/g)

5

0.5

1.5

0.4

2

2

3

3

3

1

5

MDL = Method detection limit.

To check the accuracy of digestion procedure and efficiency of the FAAS instrument spiked samples were prepared by adding a small known quantity of elemental standard solutions to both the soil and fennel fruit by applying similar digestion procedure, analysing for the levels of elements and calculating the recovery percent. The obtained percentage recovery for the fennel fruit varied from 93% to 108% and for the soil from 93% to 110% which are in the acceptable range. The reproducibility of the analytical procedure was checked by carrying out a triplicate analysis and calculating the coefficient of variation of the mean for each metal. In almost all cases, triplicate results did not differ by more than 10% of the mean.

Statistical analysis

The multivariate analysis of variance for the equality of means and correlation between the elements in fennel fruit and soil samples were done using the SPSS 16.0.

Results

The fennel fruit and the soil samples on which the plant was grown were analyzed for major (Ca, Mg, Fe, and Mn), trace essential (Cu, Zn, Cr and Co), and trace non-essential elements (Ni, Cd and Pb) with FAAS. The mean concentrations along with standard deviation of triplicate analysis are given from Tables 5 and 6 for the fennel fruit and soil samples, respectively.
Table 5

Average concentration of elements (μg/g dry weight) in the fennel fruit samples from the four sites (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Element

Ca

Mg

Fe

Mn

Cu

Cr

Co

Zn

Ni

Cd

Pb

AA

20,500 ± 290

2,390 ± 68

1,140 ± 67

45.8 ± 1.1

103 ± 4

97.7 ± 2.9

67.7 ± 3.7

37.1 ± 2.0

18.7 ± 0.5

1.90 ± 0.10

ND

B

23,000 ± 240

1,970 ± 83

1,900 ± 81

51.4 ± 1.3

48.4 ± 0.6

91.4 ± 2.4

26.2 ± 0.3

37.8 ± 2.2

24.2 ± 1.1

1.67 ± 0.10

ND

DD

21,400 ± 100

3,460 ± 93

1,480 ± 62

48.1 ± 6.2

62.5 ± 0.3

94.0 ± 4.7

49.5 ± 0.9

44.7 ± 2.5

24.0 ± 0.7

1.89 ± 0.08

ND

FS

22,900 ± 570

1,310 ± 58

1,470 ± 74

30.6 ± 0.7

23.9 ± 0.2

90.9 ± 0.4

70.8 ± 0.6

40.8 ± 1.3

24.2 ± 0.6

1.59 ± 0.10

ND

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos, FS = Finote Selam and ND = not detected.

Table 6

Average concentration of elements (μg/g dry weight) in the soil of the four sites (mean ± SD, n = 3)

Element

Ca

Mg

Fe

Mn

Cu

Cr

Co

Zn

Ni

Cd

Pb

AA

1,440 ± 37

2,870 ± 59

27,600 ± 570

1,930 ± 30

101 ± 6

141 ± 5

143 ± 4

101 ± 3

98 ± 4

2.10 ± 0.10

ND

B

1,780 ± 37

2,260 ± 22

27,200 ± 180

1,980 ± 15

51.0 ± 0.5

127 ± 6

54.3 ± 0.7

99.0 ± 2

100 ± 1

2.90 ± 0.03

ND

DD

1,630 ± 76

3,310 ± 94

26,900 ± 170

1,980 ± 23

67.9 ± 2.1

129 ± 6

115 ± 1

104 ± 4

130 ± 2

2.41 ± 0.20

ND

FS

1,770 ± 41

1,260 ± 50

28,000 ± 75

1,460 ± 36

69.6 ± 0.6

129 ± 6

133 ± 7

103 ± 2

161 ± 1

1.66 ± 0.10

ND

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos, FS = Finote Selam and ND = not detected.

Ten elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr, Co, Zn, Ni, and Cd) were detected in both the fennel fruit and soil samples while Pb was not detected in both the fennel fruit and soil samples. The levels of elements however differ significantly among each other and to some extent between sampling sites. The variation between the sampling sites is due to variation in geological, geographical and climatic conditions of the sites. The trend of variation in fennel fruit sample in Addis Ababa site is Ca > Mg > Fe > Cu > Cr > Co > Mn > Zn > Ni > Cd, in Bichena site is Ca > Mg > Fe > Cr > Mn > Cu > Zn > Co > Ni > Cd, in Debre Markos site is Ca > Mg > Fe > Cr > Cu > Co > Mn > Zn > Ni > Cd and in Finote Selam site is Ca > Fe > Mg > Cr > Co > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cu > Cd. The trend of variation in soil sample in Addis Ababa site is Fe > Mg > Mn > Ca > Co > Cr > Cu = Zn > Ni > Cd, in Bichena site is Fe > Mg > Mn > Ca > Cr > Ni > Zn > Co > Cu > Cd, in Debre Markos site is Fe > Mg > Mn > Ca > Ni > Cr > Co > Zn > Cu > Cd and in Finote Selam site is Fe > Ca > Mn > Mg > Ni > Co > Cr > Zn > Cu > Cd. In all the cases concentration of Ca and Fe are much higher than the other elements in the both the fennel fruit and soil, respectively. In both the fennel fruit and the soil the level of Cd is much low at trace level but its concentration in the soil is relatively higher than the fennel fruit.

Table 5 indicates that except Cd which has lowest concentration in samples from Finote Selam and Ni in samples from Addis Ababa all the other essential trace elements lowest concentrations were found in samples from Bichena. All the trace elements have higher concentrations in samples from Addis Ababa (Cu, Cr, Co and Cd) except Zn in samples from Debre Markos and Ni in samples from Finote Selam. These go with the expectation of minor pollution in the capital city, Addis Ababa. Table 6 indicates that Co and Cr was the most accumulated trace element in the soil sample while the level of Cd was the lowest among the elements. Since Ethiopia is 10th in the world and 1st in Africa in cattle, leather industries are flourishing in the country. Relatively larger accumulation of Cr in the soil may be due to release of Cr in the nearby leather industries but the source of Co is unknown.

Discussion

Elements are persistent in the environment and tend to bioaccumulate in plants and organisms. Bioaccumulation is of course a normal and essential process enabling the organism to have reserve for latter use for metalloproteins or cofactors or protect themselves against toxic effects (Kitata and Chandravanshi 2012). In this study the bioaccumulation of both trace and major elements were attempted to be verified by roughly comparing their concentration in one of the growth media, soil and those in plants.

In comparison between soil and fennel fruit sample except for Ca fennel fruit showed less or comparable accumulation of elements found in the soil. Higher accumulation was observed for Ca only (Table 7 and Figure 1A). This may be because it is a seasonal plant and the soil is acidic. Ca accumulation ability of fennel fruit makes it valuable Ca resource for infants, pregnant women and elderly persons who need it very much in addition to its medicinal and spicy nature. However, it is not possible to estimate the daily intake of Ca from fennel fruit by infant, pregnant women and elderly persons living in different parts of the country due to their variable daily intake. Also there is no systematic data available on the daily intake of fennel fruit. For Mg and Cu fennel fruit showed comparable accumulation to that of the soil but for Fe, Mn, Cr, Co, Zn, Ni and Cd it showed low accumulation than available in the soil in all the sites. This might indicates that they are not found in bio-available form or fennel fruit has poor accumulation for these elements. The very low concentration of Cd and not detectable Pb in the fennel fruit indicate that the risk of toxicity of these elements is low when consuming it in row or processed forms. The FAO/WHO dietary recommendations of some of the metals are given in Table 8.
Table 7

Accumulation coefficient of elements from the soil to fennel fruit

Element

Sampling sites

 

AA

B

DM

FS

Ca

14.2

12.9

13.1

12.9

Mg

0.72

0.87

1.2

0.96

Mn

0.021

0.015

0.056

0.035

Fe

0.041

0.070

0.055

0.052

Zn

0.35

0.38

0.43

0.40

Cu

1.0

1.4

0.35

0.26

Cr

0.67

0.46

0.76

0.40

Co

0.49

0.19

0.11

0.54

Ni

0.25

0.19

0.19

0.15

Cd

0.91

0.58

0.78

0.96

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos and FS = Finote Selam.

Figure 1

Comparison of concentration of elements in the fennel fruit to elements in the soil. A. Major elements and B. trace elements. AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos and FS = Finote Selam.

Table 8

FAO/WHO dietary recommendation of some of the minerals (mg/day)

Metals

Population groups

 

Infants

Pregnant women

Lactating women

Elderly (>65 year)

Ca

300-400

1200

1000

1300

Mg

26-36

220

270

190-230

Zn

2.8-4.1

5.5-10

7.2-9.5

4.9-7.0

Fe

8-9

1040

15

11-14

N.B. WHO recommendation for toxic metals in herbal medicines and products are: 10 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg for Pb and Cd, respectively.

The accumulation factor of the fennel fruit is evaluated and the result is presented in Table 7. Ca has highest accumulation coefficient (12.9–14.2) in all the sites. The reason for higher concentration of Ca in the fennel fruit is due to the acidity of the soil as a result of higher concentration of Fe (28,000–26,900 μg/g). The least accumulation is seen for Mn (0.015–0.056) in all the sites. Elements like Mg, Cu and Cd have variable concentration in the plant as that in the soil. For Cr, moderate difference in concentration is observed. In the case of Zn and Co, the concentration in the soil is higher than the fennel fruit at roughly by half. For other elements like Fe, Mn and Ni the concentration of the soil is very high (Figure 1A and B).

Comparison of levels of elemental in fennel fruit with literature values

The major elements (Ca, Mg, Fe and Mn) have been determined in the fennel fruit in different countries from different points of view (nutritional, health problems, crop yield, etc.). Some of the available studies are presented in Table 9 along with the present study for comparison.
Table 9

Summary of elemental levels reported fennel fruit worldwide (all values are in μg/g)

Country

Ca

Mg

Fe

Mn

Ref.

India

23,900 ± 1300

5,110 ± 420

744 ± 20

72.3 ± 3.0

(Kumar et al. 2005)

Turkey

10,800 ± 220

2,770 ± 39

225 ± 9

27.8 ± 0.4

(Başgel & Erdemoğlu 2006)

Turkey

6,750 ± 120

3,400 ± 380

316 ± 35

33.4 ± 5.3

(Ozcan and Akbulut 2007)

Pakistan

-

-

1030 ± 290

877 ± 85

(Khattak and Khattak 2011)

Ethiopia

21,900 ± 1,190

2,280 ± 900

1,500 ± 310

44.0 ± 9.2

Present study

The level of Ca, in this study is comparable with the study from India (Kumar et al. 2005) but much higher than from Turkey (Başgel and Erdemoğlu 2006; Ozcan and Akbulut 2007). The level of Mg in this study is lower than from Turkey (Başgel and Erdemoğlu 2006; Ozcan and Akbulut 2007), and much lower than study from India (Kumar et al. 2005). The level of Fe in this study is much higher than studies from India and Turkey (Başgel & Erdemoğlu 2006; Ozcan and Akbulut 2007; Kumar et al. 2005). The level of Mn in this study is lower than study from India but higher than Turkey (Başgel and Erdemoğlu 2006; Ozcan and Akbulut 2007; Kumar et al. 2005). Generally the values are acceptable except Fe which is very high than the literature values.

Comparisons of levels of trace elements in fennel fruit reported in various parts of the world are summarized in Table 10. Results for Cu, Cr, and Co of this study are much higher than the literature values given in Table 10. This variation may be due to difference in the geographical location, climate, agricultural chemicals like fertilizers or errors in sample preparation and analysis. Extremely higher values for Cr may be related to pollution from the tannery industry found around the sampling areas. Results of this study for Zn, Ni and Cd are comparable with literature values.
Table 10

Summary of trace elemental levels in fennel fruit worldwide (all values in μg/g)

Country

Cu

Cr

Co

Zn

Ni

Cd

Ref.

India

10.9 ± 0.8

1.50 ± 0.35

0.54 ± 0.10

34.5 ± 4.4

1.46 ± 3.43

0.086 ± 0.034

(Kumar et al. 2005)

Turkey

16.2 ± 0.4

1.04 ± 0.20

0.40 ± 0.02

37.0 ± 2.4

5.40 ± 0.14

0.004 ± 0.001

(Başgel & Erdemoğlu 2006)

Turkey

8.28 ± 0.85

35.9 ± 9.12

-

20.8 ± 4.78

28.7 ± 1.38

0.50 ± 0.1

(Ozcan and Akbulut 2007)

Pakistan

117 ± 22

-

-

37.5 ± 3.0

-

-

(Khattak and Khattak 2011)

Pakistan

   

24.7 ± 0.5

  

(Chowdhary et al. 2014)

Ethiopia

59.5 ± 33.1

93.5 ± 3.1

53.5 ± 20.5

40.1 ± 3.5

22.8 ± 2.7

1.54 ± 0.16

Present study

Multivariate analysis of variance

Variation in the mean levels of elements between the fennel fruit and soil samples were tested based on Tukey HSD multiple comparison model. Mg and Cd show significant differences (p < 0.05) at 95% confidence levels for all sampling sites whereas Zn in all sites and Fe except Addis Ababa and Debre Markos sites showed significant similarity (p > 0.05). These may indicate that fennel fruit has special storing capability for Mg and Cd irrespective of their concentration in the soil whereas Fe and Zn accumulation is the reflection of their concentration in the soil. Other elements show partial significant similarity and difference.

Ca (only in Bichena and Finote Selam), Cu (only in Finote Selam and Debre Markos), Co (only in Addis Ababa and Finote Selam) and Ni (only in Addis Ababa and Bichena) fennel fruit and soil showed significant similarity whereas for the other they showed significant difference. On the other hand, Mn and Cr showed half-half significant similarity and difference.

Pearson correlation of elements

The high association between elements, evidenced by high positive correlation coefficient, can arise from common anthropogenic or natural sources as well as from similarity in chemical properties. The Pearson correlation matrices using correlation coefficient (r) for the fennel fruit samples of the four sits are shown in Table 11. There is poor negative relation between Ca and Mn, Mg and Fe, Mg and Cu, Mg and Cr, Mg and Ni, Mg and Cd, Mn and Zn, Fe and Zn, Fe and Ni, Zn and Cu, Zn and Cr, Cu and Ni, Cr and Co and Cr and Cd. Poor positive correlation was found between Ca and Fe, Zn, Co, Ni, and Cd; Mn and Cu, Cr, Co and Cd; Fe and Cd; Cu and Co and Cd; and Ni and Cr and Co. Mg has no poor positive relationship with any of the elements. Strong negative relation was seen between Ca and Cr; Mg and Mn and Co; Mn and Ni; Fe and Cr; Zn and Co, Ni and Cd; and Cu and Cr. Strong positive relationship found between Ca and Mg and Cu; Mg and Zn; Mn and Fe; Fe and Cu and Co; and Cd and Co and Ni.
Table 11

Single tailed Pearson Correlation of elements in the fennel fruit (N = 12)

Elements

Ca

Mg

Mn

Fe

Zn

Cu

Cr

Co

Ni

Cd

Ca

1.000

0.553

−0.268

0.402

0.232

0.588

−0.964

0.192

0.118

0.240

Mg

0.553

1.000

−0.605

−0.313

0.768

−0.047

−0.427

−0.652

−0.152

−0.521

Mn

−0.268

−0.605

1.000

0.759

−0.173

0.442

0.005

0.345

−0.587

0.185

Fe

0.402

−0.313

0.759

1.000

−0.154

0.820

−0.617

0.585

−0.352

0.467

Zn

0.232

0.768

−0.173

−0.154

1.000

−0.048

−0.224

−0.825

−0.663

−0.801

Cu

0.588

−0.047

0.442

0.820

−0.048

1.000

−0.735

0.410

−0.280

0.312

Cr

−0.964

−0.427

0.005

−0.617

−0.224

−0.735

1.000

−0.266

0.064

−0.265

Co

0.192

−0.652

0.345

0.585

−0.825

0.410

−0.266

1.000

0.490

0.941

Ni

0.118

−0.152

−0.587

−0.352

−0.663

−0.280

0.064

0.490

1.000

0.604

Cd

0.240

−0.521

0.185

0.467

−0.801

0.312

−0.265

0.941

0.604

1.0

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos, FS = Finote Selam.

Bold font indicates poor negative relation (r > −0.500).

The indicate poor positive relation (r < 0.500).

The indicate strong positive relation (r > 0.500).

The Pearson correlation matrices using correlation coefficient (r) for the fennel fruit and soil samples of the four sits are shown in Table 12. There is poor relation for Mg, Cu, Cr, and Co in Addis Ababa site, Ca, Fe, Co and Ni in Bichena site and Ni and Cd in Debre Markos site between elements in the fennel fruit and soil. There is no relation between Mg in the soil and fennel fruit in Bichena site which might imply different sources. The rest elements have good relation (at least greater than ± 0.5) between elements in the fennel fruit and soil.
Table 12

Correlation of elements in the fennel fruit and soil samples in the four sits (n = 12)

Site/Elements/

Ca

Mg

Fe

Mn

Cu

Cr

Co

Zn

Ni

Cd

AA

−0.842

0.425

−0.663

0.985

−0.290

0.464

0.300

−0.993

0.683

0.500

B

−0.395

0.000*

−0.092

0.947

0.615

0.957

−0.366

0.704

−0.211

−0.500

DM

−0.613

−0.707

0.979

0.756

0.936

−0.699

0.977

−0.998

0.219

−0.013

FS

−0.721

−0.689

0.569

−0.966

−0.693

−0.950

−0.500

0.862

−0.984

−0.619

AA = Addis Ababa, B = Bichena, DD = Debre Markos, FS = Finote Selam.

Bold font indicates poor relation (r > − 0.500).

The * indicate no relation.

The indicate poor positive relation (r < 0.500).

The indicate strong positive relation (r > 0.500).

Conclusion

In this study fennel fruit and the soil in which the plant was grown was analyzed for major and trace elements (Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Cr, Co, Zn, Ni, Cd and Pb). The fennel fruit was found to have higher concentration of Ca, moderate concentration of Mg and Fe, and lower but considerable concentration of Cr, Cu, Co, Mn and Zn; relatively low concentration of Ni and very low concentration of Cd. The soil samples contain the highest concentration of Fe followed by Mg, Ca Mn, Co, Cr, Zn, Ni, and Cu. From the trace elements Cu showed higher accumulation factor. The concentration of Cd was higher in the soil than in the fennel fruit. Concentration of Pb in both the soil and the fennel fruit was below the method detection limit. For all the elements higher or comparable concentration were found in the soil and the fennel fruit except Ca in all the sites and Cu in Addis Ababa and Bichena sites.

The Ethiopian fennel fruit contain higher amount of Ca, and considerable amount of other micronutrients. It contains only trace level of Cd and Pb was not detected which showed that it is safe for human consumption in daily life. These results may also indicate that fennel plant has lesser tendency to accumulate toxic elements in the fruit.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Department of Chemistry, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, for providing the laboratory facilities. FDE is thankful to the Wolayta Sodo University, Wolayta Sodo, Ethiopia, for sponsoring his study.

Research and Graduate Programs of Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia had no role in the design, data collection, analysis or publication of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Research and Graduate Programs of Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural and Computational Sciences, Wolayta Sodo University

References

  1. Başgel S, Erdemoğlu SB: Determination of mineral and trace elements in some medicinal herbs and their infusions consumed in Turkey.Sci Total Environ 2006, 359:82–89. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cetin B, Ozer H, Cakir A, Polat T, Dursun A, Mete E, Ozturk E, Ekinci M: Antimicrobial activities of essential oil and hexane extract of florence fennel [Foeniculum vulgarevar. azoricum (Mill.) Thell.] against food borne microorganisms.J Med Food 2010, 13:196–204. 10.1089/jmf.2008.0327View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chéry CC, Herremans S, Lierde V, Vanhaecke F, Freitas MC, Jasekera R: Ultra-micro trace element contents in spices from Sri Lanka.J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2008, 276:143–147. 10.1007/s10967-007-0423-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhary F, Bukhsh A, Chaman S, Naeem M: Detection and measurement of zinc concentrations in selected indigenous medicinal plants of Pakistan.Adv Pharm Ethnomed 2014, 2:10–13. 10.14737/journal.ape/2.1.10.13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dadalioglu I, Evrendilek GA: Chemical compositions and antibacterial effects of essential oils of Turkish oregano (Origanum minutiflorum), bay laurel (Laurus nobilis), Spanish lavender (Lavandula stoechasL.), and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) on common foodborne pathogens.J Agric Food Chem 2004, 52:8255–8260. 10.1021/jf049033eView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Demirel S, Tuzen M, Saracoglu S, Soylak M: Evaluation of various digestion procedures for trace element contents of some food materials.J Hazard Mater 2008, 152:1020–26. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.077View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Desideri D, Meli MA, Roselli C, Feduzi L: Determination of essential and non-essential elements in herbal tea and camomile by polarised X-rays fluorescence spectrometer (EDPXRF).J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2011, 290:391–396. 10.1007/s10967-011-1221-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Diao W-R, Hu Q-P, Zhang H, Xu J-G: Chemical composition, antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of essential oil from seeds of fennel (Foeniculum vulgareMill.).Food Control 2014, 35:109–116. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.06.056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Divrikli U, Horzum N, Soylak M, Elci L: Trace heavy metal contents of some spices and herbal plants from western Anatolia, Turkey.Int J Food Sci Technol 2006, 41:712–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.01140.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Motaium RA, El-Seoud MAA: Irradiated sewage sludge for production of fennel plants in sandy soil.Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 2007, 78:133–142. 10.1007/s10705-006-9079-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO/WHO: Human Vitamin and Mineral Requirements, report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Faudale M, Viladomat F, Bastida J, Poli F, Codina C: Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of wild, edible, and medicinal fennel from different Mediterranean countries.J Agric Food Chem 2008, 56:1912–1920. 10.1021/jf073083cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Getahun A: Some common medicinal and poisonous plants used in Ethiopian folk medicine. Addis Ababa University press, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1976.Google Scholar
  14. He W, Huang B: A review of chemistry and bioactivities of a medicinal spice:Foeniculum vulgare.J. Med. Plant Res 2011, 5:3595–3600.Google Scholar
  15. Javidnia K, Dastgheib L, Mohammadi Samani S, Nasiri A: Antihirsutism activity of fennel (fruits ofFoeniculum vulgare) extract – a double-blind placebo controlled study.Phytomedicine 2003, 10:455–458. 10.1078/094471103322331386View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Khattak MI, Khattak MI: Study of heacy trave metals in some medicinal-herbal plants of Pakistan.Pakistan J Bot 2011, 43:2003–2009.Google Scholar
  17. Kim SI, Chang KS, Yang YC, Kim BS, Ahn YJ: Repellency of aerosol and cream products containing fennel oil to mosquitoes under laboratory and field conditions.Pest Manag Sci 2004, 60:1125–1130. 10.1002/ps.921View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitata RB, Chandravanshi BS: Concentration levels of major and trace metals in onion (Allium cepaL.) and irrigation water around Meki Town and Lake Ziway, Ethiopia.Bull Chem Soc Ethiop 2012, 26:27–42.Google Scholar
  19. Kumar A, Nair AGC, Reddy AVR, Garg AN: Analysis of essential elements in Pragya-peya a herbal drink and its constituents by neutron activation.J Pharm Biomed Anal 2005, 37:631–638. 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.11.051View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallinckrodt MG-v, Meissne D: General aspects of the role of metals in clinical chemistry. In Handbook on Metals in Clinical and Analytical Chemistry. Edited by: Seiler HG, Sigel A, Sige H. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1994:4–27.Google Scholar
  21. Mohamad RH, El-Bastawesy AM, Abdel-Monem MG, Noor AM, Al-Mehdar HA, Sharawy SM, El-Merzabani MM: Antioxidant and anticarcinogenic effects of methanolic extract and volatile oil of fennel seeds (Foeniculum vulgare).J Med Food 2011, 14:986–1001. 10.1089/jmf.2008.0255View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Dell BL, Sunde RA: Handbook of Nutritionally Essential Mineral Elements Clinical Nutrition in Health and Disease. CRC Press, New York; 1997.Google Scholar
  23. Oktay M, Gülçin İ, Küfrevioğlu Öİ: Determination of in vitro antioxidant activity of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) seed extracts.LWT - Food Sci Technol 2003, 36:263–271. 10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00226-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ozcan MM, Akbulut M: Estimation of minerals, nitrate and nitrite contents of medicinal and aromatic plants used as spices, condiments and herbal tea.Food Chem 2007, 106:852–858.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ozcan MM, Unver A, Ucar T, Arslan D: Mineral content of some herbs and herbal teas by infusion and decoction.Food Chem 2008, 106:1120–1127. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Parthasarathy VA, Chempakam B, Zachariah TJ: Chemistry of Spices. CAB International, UK; 2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Qiu J, Li H, Su H, Dong J, Luo M, Wang J, Leng B, Deng Y, Liu J, Deng X: Chemical composition of fennel essential oil and its impact onStaphylococcus aureusexotoxin production.World J. Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 28:1399–1405. 10.1007/s11274-011-0939-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rahimi R, Ardekani M: Medicinal properties ofFoeniculum vulgareMill. in traditional Iranian medicine and modern phytotherapy.Chin J Integr Med 2013, 19:73–79. 10.1007/s11655-013-1327-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rasul A, Akhtar N, Khan BA, Mahmood T, Uz Zaman S, Khan HM: Formulation development of a cream containing fennel extract: in vivo evaluation for anti-aging effects.Pharmazie 2012, 67:54–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rather MA, Dar BA, Sofi SN, Bhat BA, Qurishi MA: Foeniculum vulgare: A comprehensive review of its traditional use, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and safety.Arabian J. Chem 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.04.011Google Scholar
  31. Renna M, Gonnella M: The use of the sea fennel as a new spice-colorant in culinary preparations.Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 2012, 1:111–115. 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2013.06.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sembratowicz I, Rusinek-prystupa E: Effects of brewing time on the content of minerals in infusion of medicinal herbs.Polish J Environ Stud 2014, 23:177–186.Google Scholar
  33. Senatore F, Oliviero F, Scandolera E, Taglialatela-Scafati O, Roscigno G, Zaccardelli M, De Falco E: Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of anethole-rich oil from leaves of selected varieties of fennel [Foeniculum vulgareMill. ssp. vulgare var. azoricum (Mill.) Thell].Fitoterapia 2013, 90:214–219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shahat AA, Ibrahim AY, Hendawy SF, Omer EA, Hammouda FM, Abdel-Rahman FH, Saleh MA: Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oils from organically cultivated fennel cultivars.Molecules 2011, 16:1366–1377. 10.3390/molecules16021366View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shirahatt RV, Ankola AV, Nagesh L: Effect of fennel seeds on dental plaque and salivary pH – a clinical study.J Oral Health Community Dent 2010, 4:38–41.Google Scholar
  36. Singh V, Garg AN: Availability of essential trace elements in Indian cereals, vegetables and spices using INAA and the contribution of spices to daily dietary intake.Food Chem 2006, 94:81–89. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Szymczycha-Madeja A, Welna M, Pohl P: Elemental analysis of teas and their infusions by spectrometric methods.Trends Anal Chem 2012, 35:165–181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zengin M, Özcan MM, Çetin Ü, Gezgin S: Mineral contents of some aromatic plants, their growth soils and infusions.J Sci Food Agric 2008, 88:581–589. 10.1002/jsfa.3120View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zuberi MI, Kebede B, Gosaye T, Belachew O: Species of herbal spices grown in the poor farmers’ home gardens of West Shoa, Highlands of Ethiopia: an ethnobotanical account.J Biodivers Environ Sci 2014, 4:164–185.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Endalamaw and Chandravanshi; licensee Springer. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.