Open Access

Chemotherapy dose reduction due to chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings: a single-center experience

  • Bhavana Bhatnagar1,
  • Steven Gilmore2,
  • Olga Goloubeva3,
  • Colleen Pelser1,
  • Michelle Medeiros1,
  • Saranya Chumsri1,
  • Katherine Tkaczuk1,
  • Martin Edelman1 and
  • Ting Bao1Email author
SpringerPlus20143:366

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-366

Received: 1 June 2014

Accepted: 2 June 2014

Published: 16 July 2014

Abstract

Purpose

Taxanes are a cornerstone treatment in early and advanced stage breast cancer and in other common solid tumor malignancies; however, the development of chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) often necessitates dose-reduction, which may hamper the effectiveness of the drug and compromise survival outcomes especially when used in the adjuvant setting. Limited literature is available on the prevalence and severity of dose reduction due to CIPN. We sought to determine the frequency and severity of CIPN-induced dose reduction in early stage breast cancer patients who received taxane-based chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-institution breast cancer clinic chart review of 123 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and treated with taxane-based neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center between January 2008 and December 2011.

Results

Forty-nine of 123 (40%; 95% CI: 31-49%) patients required dose reduction. Twenty-one (17%; 95% CI: 11-25%) of these patients were dose-reduced specifically due to CIPN that developed during treatment. The median relative dose intensity (received dose/planned dose) for the 21 CIPN-induced dose reduction patients was 73.4% (range, 68.0-94.0%). Patients with diabetes appeared to have a higher risk of taxane-induced dose reduction (p-value=0.01). African-American patients and those treated with paclitaxel (rather than docetaxel) experienced a higher-risk of CIPN-induced dose reduction (p-values are <0.001 and 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The incidence of CIPN-associated dose reduction in our patient population was 17%. African-American patients, diabetics and subjects treated with paclitaxel had a higher risk for CIPN-associated dose reduction in our study.

Keywords

Peripheral neuropathyTaxanesDose reductionBreast cancer

Introduction

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and potentially dose-limiting complication of many effective cytotoxic agents, including taxanes, which are widely used as part of adjuvant and neoadjuvant doublet and triplet chemotherapy combinations for the treatment of breast cancer. Taxanes function as mictrotubule stabilizing agents (MTSAs) and exert a broad spectrum of cytotoxic effects in cancers of the breast, ovary and lung (Rowinsky & Donehower 1995). The precise pathogenesis through which taxanes exert their neurotoxic effects is unclear; however the underlying mechanism is believed to be promotion of microtubule polymerization and inhibition of depolymerization leading to inhibition of axonal transport within neurons. This results in disruption of signaling in peripheral nerves leading to sensory, motor, or autonomic peripheral neuropathy that may interfere with activities of daily living (ADL) or result in significant disability (Swain & Arezzo 2008). CIPN classically occurs within 24–72 hours following taxane administration and, in most cases is reversible upon prompt discontinuation of the offending agent (Rowinsky et al. 1993; Argyriou et al. 2008). Symptoms are typically described as numbness and tingling in a "stocking-and-glove" distribution, particularly in the distal lower extremities. Patients may also report intermittent sharp, shooting leg pain. Loss of deep tendon reflexes and sensation to pain and temperature are also commonly reported (Argyriou et al. 2008). Previously reported risk factors for CIPN include older age, history of alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, inherited neuropathy, and prior therapy with neurotoxic medications (Makino 2004; Verstappen et al. 2003; Tanabe et al. 2013). In its most severe form, development of CIPN can lead to significant pain syndromes, difficulty with ambulation, and interference with routine daily activities resulting prompt dose reductions and delays that potentially reduce the efficacy of early stage breast cancer treatments (8–10). However, despite the prospect of poorer survival associated with dose reduction, the incidence and severity of dose reduction specifically due to CIPN has not been well-described and studied prospectively. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective chart review evaluating the prevalence, severity, and risk factors associated with dose reduction required due to taxane-induced peripheral sensory neuropathy among breast cancer patients at an academic medical center.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the University of Maryland Baltimore Internal Review Board. We reviewed electronic medical and pharmacy records of 123 sequentially treated breast cancer patients who received a taxane as part of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for localized breast cancer between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2011. Patients were treated per standard of care recommendations and treatment decisions and dose reductions or delays were made based on routine standard of care recommendations. Patients who received treatment on a clinical trial were treated based on the study protocol. Eligible patients were over 18 years of age and had an established diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer. Data collected included: demographics (age, race, and gender), taxane received (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel), hormone receptor expression status, HER2/neu expression status, history of diabetes, HIV status, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy, and alcohol history. Progress notes were reviewed to determine whether patients developed peripheral neuropathy during their chemotherapy course and whether dose reductions were instituted at the discretion of the treating physician. Pharmacy records were used to confirm the number of treatment received and the relative dose intensity (received dose/planned dose).

Statistical analysis

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed and compared between two distinct cohorts of subjects, those who experienced a dose reduction due to any reason and those who did not. In addition we conducted further analyses only among those who experienced a dose reduction, comparing those who had a dose reduction due to CIPN vs. those with dose reductions for other reasons.

We assessed the following potential risk factors for dose-reduction: age, HER2/neu expression status, alcohol abuse, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and type of taxane received. Fisher’s and Fisher-Freeman-Halton’s exact tests were used for 2x2 and rxc contingency tables, respectively. All tests were done at the two-sided 0.05 level of significance. Statistical analysis was conducted in SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary NC).

Results

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Of the 123 patients, 120 were women and three were men. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range, 32–78). Forty-eight patients (39%) were Caucasian, and 70 (57%) were African-American. Seventy patients received docetaxel, and 46 were treated with paclitaxel. Seven patients either received both agents, or nab-paclitaxel. Five patients had a prior history of alcohol abuse, and 20 (16%) had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Forty-two patients (34%) had triple negative breast cancer. Forty nine patients (40%), required dose reduction during the course of their treatment. Twenty one of these (17%) had dose reductions due to CIPN and 28 (23%) had reductions due to other causes. The median relative dose intensity (received dose/planned dose) for the 21 CIPN-induced dose reduction patients was 88% (range, 62%-97%).
Table 1

Selected demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients

Variable

Patients

All patients, No. (%)

123 (100)

Sex, No. (%)

 

  Female

120 (98)

  Male

3 (2)

Race

 

  African American

48 (39)

  Caucasian

5 (4)

  Other

70 (57)

Age (in years) at diagnosis, median [range]

53 [32–78]

Hormone receptor expression status, No. (%)

 

  ER+

81 (66)

  PR+

67 (54)

  HER2/neu overexpressed

16 (13)

Medical comorbidities, No. (%)

 

  DM

20 (16)

  HIV

3 (2)

  Alcohol abuse

5 (4)

  Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy

4 (3)

Taxane received, No (%)

 

  Paclitaxel only

46 (37)

  Docetaxel only

70 (57)

  Multiple agents

7 (6)

Total patients needing dose reduction, No. (%)

49 (40)

  CIPN

21 (17)

  Other causes

28 (24)

Dose reductions on taxane therapy

Out of 123 total patients, 49 patients (40%) required dose reduction of the taxane they had received. In addition to CIPN, the other common causes for dose reduction included diarrhea (n =10), infection (n=5), myelosuppression (n=5), hypersensitivity reaction (n=3), and rash (n=2). The distribution of patient characteristics for those who underwent dose reduction and those who did not are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of tumor characteristics such as estrogen or progesterone receptors expression status or HER2/neu expression, race, age or taxane received. However, patients who experienced toxicities and required a changed regimen mid-treatment, were more likely to have a dose reduction (86% vs. 37%; p=0.02). Furthermore, patients with underlying diabetes were more likely to require chemotherapy dose reduction as those without diabetes (65% vs. 35%; p=0.02).
Table 2

Selected demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients

Categorical factor

No dose reduction (N=74)

Dose reduction (N=49)

p-value1

 

N(row%)

N(row%)

 

Her2

   

Negative

64 (63)

38 (37)

0.23

Positive

10 (48)

11 (52)

 

Agent

   

Paclitaxel only

28 (61)

18 (39)

0.572

Docetaxel only

45 (64)

25 (36)

 

Multiple agents3

1 (14)

6 (86)

0.023

Alcohol

   

No

71 (60)

47 (40)

1.00

Yes

3 (60)

2 (40)

 

Diabetes

   

No

67 (65)

36 (35)

0.02

Yes

7 (35)

13 (65)

 

Race

   

Black

40 (57)

30 (43)

0.574

White

30 (63)

18 (37)

 

Other

4 (80)

1 (20)

 

Continuous factor

Mean (range)

Mean (range)

 

Age (years)

53 (32–78)

55 (35–75)

0.23

1p- values calculated with the use of two-sided Fisher’s and Fisher-Freeman-Halton’s tests for categorical variables and the t-test for continuous variables.

2Patients treated with paclitaxel (or nab- paclitaxel) only vs. those treated with docetaxel only.

3Patients treated with multiple agents, compared to those treated with either paclitaxel only or docetaxel only.

4Black compared to white only.

Dose reductions due to CIPN

Patients who were dose-reduced specifically for CIPN were compared to those who were dose-reduced for other causes. These patients were compared according to HER2/neu expression, taxane received, alcohol abuse, history of diabetes, race and age. A greater proportion of African-American (AA) patients had CIPN-related dose reduction (53% vs. 22%; p<0.001). Patients treated with paclitaxel appeared to be more likely to require dose reduction due to CIPN than those who received docetaxel (78% vs. 20%; p=0.001). No other plausible risk factors were associated with dose reductions due to CIPN. Results of the statistical analyses are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3

Selected demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients grouped by reason for dose reduction

Categorical factor

Dose reduction due to other reasons (N=28)

CIPN dose reduction (N=21)

p-value1

 

N(row%)

N(row%)

 

Her2

   

Negative

22 (58)

16 (42)

1.00

Positive

6 (55)

5 (45)

 

Agent

   

Paclitaxel only

4 (22)

14 (78)

0.001 2

Docetaxel only

20 (80)

5 (20)

 

Multiple agents3

4 (67)

2 (33)

0.68

Alcohol

   

No

27 (57)

20 (42)

1.00

Yes

1 (50)

1 (50)

 

Diabetes

   

No

22 (61)

14 (39)

0.51

Yes

6 (46)

7 (54)

 

Race

   

Black

14 (47)

16 (53)

<0.001 4

White

14 (78)

4 (22)

 

Other

0

1 (100)

 

Continuous Factor

Mean (range)

Mean (range)

 

Age (years)

55 (42–75)

55 (35-67)

0.84

1p-values calculated with the use of two-sided Fisher’s and Fisher-Freeman-Halton’s tests for categorical variables and the t-test for continuous variables.

2Patients treated with paclitaxel (or nab- paclitaxel) only vs. those treated with docetaxel only.

3Patients treated with multiple agents, compared to those treated with either paclitaxel only or docetaxel only.

4Black compared to white only.

Discussion

In this single institution retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, 17% of patients required dose-reduction due to CIPN, resulting in a median relative dose intensity of 73.4%. These results add to a sparse body of literature pertaining to the frequency of taxane-associated dose reduction. To date, only one other retrospective analysis has described changes in dose due to paclitaxel induced peripheral neuropathy. Among 219 breast cancer patients 4% required discontinuation of treatment as a result of neuropathy (Tanabe et al. 2013), however the number who required dose reduction was not reported.

Dose reduction remains a significant concern as the positive impact of dose intensity of chemotherapy on tumor control of breast cancer has been well-demonstrated (Bonadonna et al. 1995; Budman et al. 1998; Wood et al. 1994). In a study of 207 breast cancer patients who received adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy, the 20-year overall survival rate was 52% for patients who received ≥ 85% of the total calculated dose for the regimen compared to median overall survival of 11 years for those who received 65-84% of the total calculated dose, and 4.5 years for the patients who received less than 65% of the calculated dose (Bonadonna et al. 1995). Therefore the frequency and risk factors for chemotherapy dose reduction as a result of CIPN is of clinical interest.

In our study, an underlying diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was associated with a two-fold risk for taxane-associated dose reduction. Furthermore, a comparison between patients who were dose-reduced for all causes to those who were reduced for CIPN alone demonstrated that patients treated with paclitaxel were more likely to require dose reduction for CIPN compared to those who received docetaxel and that African-American race appeared to correlate with a higher risk of developing CIPN necessitating dose reduction.

The incidence of peripheral neuropathy due to taxanes varies and is based largely on several predisposing risk factors such as dose per cycle, concurrent therapy with other neurotoxic agents, treatment schedule, cumulative dose, duration of infusion and pre-existing neuropathy from other medical conditions such as diabetes (Argyriou et al. 2008; Lee & Swain 2006; Mielke et al. 2005; Rowinsky et al. 1993). The incidence of paclitaxel-induced severe sensory neuropathy in phase II and III studies is 2-33% for doses 175 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, and 4-24% when given 80 to 100 mg/m2 given every week (Gradishar et al. 2005; Jones et al. 2005; Nabholtz et al. 1996; Seidman et al. 1995; Smith et al. 1999; Winer et al. 2004). In most studies, paclitaxel has been reported to result in higher rates of grade 3–4 sensory neuropathy (7-33%) (Winer et al. 2004; Seidman et al. 2008; Smith et al. 1999; Jones et al. 2005) compared to docetaxel (1-9%) (Harvey et al. 2006; Study G et al. 1999; Nabholtz et al. 1999), which may, in part, be related to the vehicle used for paclitaxel administration, Cremophor EL, which has been reported to produce ganglionopathies itself (Mielke et al. 2006). A reported 58% of patients develop, what is referred to as paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome (P-APS), a distinct clinical entity recently characterized by Loprinzi and colleagues which may also predispose patients to PIPN later in their treatment course (Loprinzi et al. 2011; Reeves et al. 2012).

Management of CIPN remains challenging considering that commonly used pharmacologic therapies have varying rates of success and often carry their own adverse effects. Gabapentin, nortriptyline, and lamotrigine failed to significantly improve peripheral neuropathy symptoms in patients exposed to taxanes, platinum agents, or vinca alkaloids (Hammack et al. 2002; Rao et al. 2008; North Central Cancer Treatment G et al. 2007). In contrast, duloxetine administration produced modest decreases in the average pain score (1.06 compared to 0.34 for placebo; p-0.003), but was associated with increased fatigue and nausea (Alliance for Clinical Trials in O et al. 2013). Other pharmacologic interventions such as glutamine, vitamin E, amifostine, recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor have been evaluated for the prevention of CIPN with mixed results (Albers et al. 2011; Postma et al. 1999; Amara 2008; Wang et al. 2007; Stubblefield et al. 2005; Kottschade et al. 2011). Acupuncture has been shown to be a low-risk and well-tolerated non-pharmacological treatment strategy in the management of CIPN, however, its use has been mainly limited to few studies with small numbers of patients (Bao et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2009).

CIPN remains an important toxicity of taxane administration. A recently published study demonstrated that CIPN, in and of itself, has no effect on disease free survival, progression free survival or overall survival (Schneider et al. 2012), however, the potential consequences of dose reduction as a result of CIPN on PFS and OS remain unknown. In its most severe form, CIPN greatly impairs quality of life and can potentially lead to secondary consequences such as increased risk of recurrent falls (Gewandter et al. 2013; Tofthagen et al. 2012). Most importantly, as demonstrated in our report as well as in several others, it can be severe enough to warrant discontinuation of a highly effective class of chemotherapy agents, prompting further investigation for potential risk-factors.

The limitations of this study include the retrospective nature of the data collection, which could result in bias in the determination of cause of dose reduction. In addition, when examining risk factors for CIPN-specific dose reduction, we compared those with CIPN dose reductions to patients who had dose reductions for other reasons. Thus associations may be due to factors that relate to taxane administration, development of CIPN, or other causes. Because CIPN dose reduction is directly related to the severity of CIPN, other comparison groups, such as those who experienced CIPN without dose reduction, would only provide indicators of CIPN incidence or severity. Further elucidation of additional factors for CIPN dose reduction may therefore prove to be problematic.

The strengths of this study include the fact that this is one of the few studies to report incidence and risk factors for dose reduction, as well as the magnitude of dose reduction. In addition, the relatively high sample size and the high number of African Americans in our sample provide further data and increase the generalizability of these results the population of patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy.

In conclusion, CIPN is significant dose-limiting toxicity of taxane use. Elucidation of risk factors will be valuable in identifying patients at risk for developing CIPN and tailoring their treatment accordingly so as to avoid dose reductions of effective chemotherapy agents.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the patients and research nurses involved in the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Medicine

References

  1. Albers JW, Chaudhry V, Cavaletti G, Donehower RC: Interventions for preventing neuropathy caused by cisplatin and related compounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011., 2: CD005228. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005228.pub3Google Scholar
  2. Alliance for Clinical Trials in O, Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, Fleishman S, Paskett ED, Ahles T, Bressler LR, Fadul CE, Knox C, Le-Lindqwister N, Gilman PB, Shapiro CL: Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013, 309(13):1359-1367. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.2813View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Amara S: Oral glutamine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Ann Pharmacother 2008, 42(10):1481-1485. doi:10.1345/aph.1L179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyriou AA, Koltzenburg M, Polychronopoulos P, Papapetropoulos S, Kalofonos HP: Peripheral nerve damage associated with administration of taxanes in patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hemat 2008, 66(3):218-228. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bao T, Zhang R, Badros A, Lao L: Acupuncture treatment for bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy: a case report. Pain Res Treat 2011, 2011: 920807. doi:10.1155/2011/920807Google Scholar
  6. Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C: Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 1995, 332(14):901-906. doi:10.1056/NEJM199504063321401View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Budman DR, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Henderson IC, Wood WC, Weiss RB, Ferree CR, Muss HB, Green MR, Norton L, Frei E 3rd: Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1998, 90(16):1205-1211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, Pinter T, Van Belle S, Vorobiof D, Duarte R, Gil Gil M, Bodrogi I, Murray E, Yelle L, von Minckwitz G, Korec S, Simmonds P, Buzzi F, Gonzalez Mancha R, Richardson G, Walpole E, Ronzoni M, Murawsky M, Alakl M, Riva A, Crown J, Study G: Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17(8):2341-2354.Google Scholar
  9. Gewandter JS, Fan L, Magnuson A, Mustian K, Peppone L, Heckler C, Hopkins J, Tejani M, Morrow GR, Mohile SG: Falls and functional impairments in cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): a University of Rochester CCOP study. Support Care Cancer 2013. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1766-yGoogle Scholar
  10. Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, Hawkins M, O'Shaughnessy J: Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(31):7794-7803. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammack JE, Michalak JC, Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Soori GS, Tirona MT, Rowland KM Jr, Stella PJ, Johnson JA: Phase III evaluation of nortriptyline for alleviation of symptoms of cis-platinum-induced peripheral neuropathy. Pain 2002, 98(1–2):195-203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey V, Mouridsen H, Semiglazov V, Jakobsen E, Voznyi E, Robinson BA, Groult V, Murawsky M, Cold S: Phase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(31):4963-4970. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0294View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones SE, Erban J, Overmoyer B, Budd GT, Hutchins L, Lower E, Laufman L, Sundaram S, Urba WJ, Pritchard KI, Mennel R, Richards D, Olsen S, Meyers ML, Ravdin PM: Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(24):5542-5551. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.02.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kottschade LA, Sloan JA, Mazurczak MA, Johnson DB, Murphy BP, Rowland KM, Smith DA, Berg AR, Stella PJ, Loprinzi CL: The use of vitamin E for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 2011, 19(11):1769-1777. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1018-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee JJ, Swain SM: Peripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(10):1633-1642. doi:10.1200/Jco.2005.04.0543View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Loprinzi CL, Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Wolf SL, Burger KN, Kamal A, Le-Lindqwister NA, Soori GS, Jaslowski AJ, Novotny PJ, Lachance DH: Natural history of paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome: prospective cohort study NCCTG N08C1. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(11):1472-1478. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Makino H: Treatment and care of neurotoxicity from taxane anticancer agents. Breast Cancer 2004, 11(1):100-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mielke S, Sparreboom A, Steinberg SM, Gelderblom H, Unger C, Behringer D, Mross K: Association of Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics with the development of peripheral neuropathy in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11(13):4843-4850. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0298View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mielke S, Sparreboom A, Mross K: Peripheral neuropathy: a persisting challenge in paclitaxel-based regimes. Eur J Cancer 2006, 42(1):24-30. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nabholtz JM, Gelmon K, Bontenbal M, Spielmann M, Catimel G, Conte P, Klaassen U, Namer M, Bonneterre J, Fumoleau P, Winograd B: Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996, 14(6):1858-1867.Google Scholar
  21. Nabholtz JM, Senn HJ, Bezwoda WR, Melnychuk D, Deschenes L, Douma J, Vandenberg TA, Rapoport B, Rosso R, Trillet-Lenoir V, Drbal J, Molino A, Nortier JW, Richel DJ, Nagykalnai T, Siedlecki P, Wilking N, Genot JY, Hupperets PS, Pannuti F, Skarlos D, Tomiak EM, Murawsky M, Alakl M, Aapro M, and 304 Study Group: Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17(5):1413-1424.Google Scholar
  22. Postma TJ, Hoekman K, van Riel JM, Heimans JJ, Vermorken JB: Peripheral neuropathy due to biweekly paclitaxel, epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Neurooncol 1999, 45(3):241-246.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao RD, Michalak JC, Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Soori GS, Nikcevich DA, Warner DO, Novotny P, Kutteh LA, Wong GY, North Central Cancer Treatment G: Efficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (N00C3). Cancer 2007, 110(9):2110-2118. doi:10.1002/cncr.23008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rao RD, Flynn PJ, Sloan JA, Wong GY, Novotny P, Johnson DB, Gross HM, Renno SI, Nashawaty M, Loprinzi CL: Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, N01C3. Cancer 2008, 112(12):2802-2808. doi:10.1002/cncr.23482View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Reeves BN, Dakhil SR, Sloan JA, Wolf SL, Burger KN, Kamal A, Le-Lindqwister NA, Soori GS, Jaslowski AJ, Kelaghan J, Novotny PJ, Lachance DH, Loprinzi CL: Further data supporting that paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome is associated with development of peripheral neuropathy: North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial N08C1. Cancer 2012, 118(20):5171-5178. doi:10.1002/cncr.27489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC: Drug-Therapy - Paclitaxel (Taxol). New Engl J Med 1995, 332(15):1004-1014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowinsky EK, Eisenhauer EA, Chaudhry V, Arbuck SG, Donehower RC: Clinical Toxicities Encountered with Paclitaxel (Taxol(R)). Semin Oncol 1993, 20(4):1-15.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider BP, Zhao F, Wang M, Stearns V, Martino S, Jones V, Perez EA, Saphner T, Wolff AC, Sledge GW Jr, Wood WC, Davidson NE, Sparano JA: Neuropathy is not associated with clinical outcomes in patients receiving adjuvant taxane-containing therapy for operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30(25):3051-3057. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.8446View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Seidman AD, Tiersten A, Hudis C, Gollub M, Barrett S, Yao TJ, Lepore J, Gilewski T, Currie V, Crown J, Hakes T, Baselga J, Sklarin N, Moynihan ME, Kearns C, Spriggs D, Norton L: Phase II trial of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion as initial and salvage chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995, 13(10):2575-2581.Google Scholar
  30. Seidman AD, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Harris L, Muss H, Marcom PK, Gipson G, Burstein H, Lake D, Shapiro CL, Ungaro P, Norton L, Winer E, Hudis C: Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26(10):1642-1649. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.6699View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith RE, Brown AM, Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Lembersky BC, Atkins JH, Shibata HR, Baez L, DeFusco PA, Davila E, Tipping SJ, Bearden JD, Thirlwell MP: Randomized trial of 3-hour versus 24-hour infusion of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-26. J Clin Oncol 1999, 17(11):3403-3411.Google Scholar
  32. Stubblefield MD, Vahdat LT, Balmaceda CM, Troxel AB, Hesdorffer CS, Gooch CL: Glutamine as a neuroprotective agent in high-dose paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiologic study. Clin Oncol 2005, 17(4):271-276.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Swain SM, Arezzo JC: Neuropathy associated with microtubule inhibitors: diagnosis, incidence, and management. Adv Hematol Oncol 2008, 6(6):455-467.Google Scholar
  34. Tanabe Y, Hashimoto K, Shimizu C, Hirakawa A, Harano K, Yunokawa M, Yonemori K, Katsumata N, Tamura K, Ando M, Kinoshita T, Fujiwara Y: Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2013, 18(1):132-138. doi:10.1007/s10147-011-0352-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tofthagen C, Overcash J, Kip K: Falls in persons with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer 2012, 20(3):583-589. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1127-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Verstappen CC, Heimans JJ, Hoekman K, Postma TJ: Neurotoxic complications of chemotherapy in patients with cancer: clinical signs and optimal management. Drugs 2003, 63(15):1549-1563.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang WS, Lin JK, Lin TC, Chen WS, Jiang JK, Wang HS, Chiou TJ, Liu JH, Yen CC, Chen PM: Oral glutamine is effective for preventing oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in colorectal cancer patients. Oncologist 2007, 12(3):312-319. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-3-312View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Winer EP, Berry DA, Woolf S, Duggan D, Kornblith A, Harris LN, Michaelson RA, Kirshner JA, Fleming GF, Perry MC, Graham ML, Sharp SA, Keresztes R, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Muss H, Norton L: Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22(11):2061-2068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.08.048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH, Cooper MR, Younger J, Hart RD, Moore A, Ellerton JA, Norton L, Ferree CR, Colangelo Bellow A, Frei E, Henderson IC: Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1994, 330(18):1253-1259. doi:10.1056/NEJM199405053301801View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang C, Ma YX, Yan Y: Clinical effects of acupuncture for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Tradit Chin Med 2010, 30(1):13-14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou Y, Garcia MK, Chang DZ, Chiang J, Lu J, Yi Q, Romaguera J, Delasalle K, Guo Y, Forman A, Fang W, Wang M: Multiple myeloma, painful neuropathy, acupuncture? Am J Clin Oncol 2009, 32(3):319-325. doi:10.1097/COC.0b013e318173a520View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bhatnagar et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.