Open Access

Adsorptive treatment of brewery effluent using activated Chrysophyllum albidium seed shell carbon

  • Matthew Chukwudi Menkiti1Email author,
  • Mathew Chidiebere Aneke2,
  • Paul Madus Ejikeme3, 4,
  • Okechukwu Dominic Onukwuli1 and
  • Nwasinachi Uzoma Menkiti5
SpringerPlus20143:213

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-213

Received: 17 January 2014

Accepted: 25 March 2014

Published: 30 April 2014

Abstract

Chrysophyllum albidium seed shell, an abundant, biodegradable and inexpensive natural resource was used as a precursor to bioadsorbent production for the removal of suspended and dissolved particles (SDP) from initially coagulated Brewery Effluent (BRE). Influence of key parameters such as contact time, bioadsorbent dose, pH and temperature were investigated using batch mode. The thermal behavior studies were evaluated using Thermogravimetric and Differential scanning calorimetric analyses. The morphological observations and functional groups of the bioadsorbents were determined using scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, respectively. The adsorption equilibrium, thermodynamics and kinetic of SDP adsorption on H3PO4-treated shell and NH4Cl-treated shell were examined at specified temperatures. Equilibrium data sufficiently fitted the Langmuir isotherm model (R2 > 0.99; SSE < 0.09). The pseudo-second order kinetic model provided the best correlation (R2 > 0.99; SSE < 0.14) with the experimental data. The values of ΔG° and ΔH° indicated the spontaneous and endothermic nature of the process. This study demonstrated that C. albidium seed shell could be utilized as low cost, renewable, ecofriendly bioadsorbent for the uptake of SDP from BRE.

Keywords

Brewery effluent Chrysophyllum albidium Adsorption isothermsSuspended and dissolved particles

Introduction

Brewing is an intensive water consuming activity, besides utilizing a wide variety of chemicals. Expectedly, large volumes of effluent is discharged into water courses of brewery bearing communities, leaving in its wake a polluted aquifer (Khuo-Omoregbe et al. 2005; Menkiti 2010). Increasing concentration of these organic/non-organic enriched BRE in the water constitute a severe health hazard to both plants and animals, thus impeding the functionality of the ecosystem. The situation is typical of the BRE receiving aquatic system in Nigeria, where much of the water resources cannot be utilized without a form of treatment, following effluent discharges with negligible consideration for environmental control (Menkiti and Onukwuli 2011a).

BRE, generated from lager beer production, contains large amount of SDP (Menkiti and Onukwuli 2010). Typically, the organic contents of BRE consists of sugars, soluble starch, ethanol, volatile fatty acids and solids which are mainly spent grains, yeast and trub (Driessen and Vereijken 2003). Untreated BRE quantitatively contains suspended solids (100–1500 mg/l), chemical oxygen demand (300–800 mg/l), nitrogen (30–100 mg/l) and phosphorus (10–30 mg/l) (Menkiti et al.2011a World Bank Group 1998).

Over the years, significant attention has been given to the environmental cleanup of such contaminated aqua system using varieties of techniques such as precipitation, ion-exchange, coagulation, reverse osmosis and adsorption (Hameed and El-Khaiary 2008; Larous et al.2005; Menkiti et al.2011b; Menkiti and Onukwuli 2011b). Among the different treatments listed above, adsorption technology is attractive due to its merits of efficiency,even at low concentration of contaminants (Meena et al. 2008; Yakubu et al. 2008), economy, simple operation and insensitivity to toxic substances (Grini 2005; Feng et al.2010; Menkiti and Onukwuli 2011b).

The common adsorbents primarily include zeolite, clays, polymeric materials and natural agricultural materials which provided the focus of this study (Asasian and Kaghazchi 2013; Jiang et al.2012; Amirnia et al.2012). These natural materials have potential to be used as low cost bioadsorbent, as they represent unused resources, abundantly available and known to be eco-friendly (Deans and Dioxn 1992). Progressively, much attention has been focused on techniques of converting these waste materials into useful adsorbents. Among these agricultural wastes are saw dust (Meena et al. 2008) palm ash (Ahmad et al.2007).

Chrysophylum albidium seed shell, considered in this study, is of tropical forest tree of genus chrysophyllum, family of sapotaca e and order of ericales. The fruit is large berry containing 4 to 5 flattened seeds with a hard shell (Bada 1997). Significant quantities of these seeds shells are produced annually in Nigeria without being put to useful ends industrially. However, successful application of adsorbent from C. albidium seed shells for the removal of heavy metals had been reported (Oboh et al.2009; Onwu and Ogah 2010; Ejikeme et al.2011). According to the author’s knowledge, no attempt has been made until now to use this seed shell for the treatment of natural organic aqueous waste, such as BRE. Therefore, it was of interest to experiment with such a promising biomaterial for the adsorptive removal of SDP from initially coagulated BRE by batch technique. The work further seeks to investigate the influence of contact time, adsorbent dosage, temperature and effluent pH on the adsorptive uptake of SDP from the BRE. Also, the research investigated the ability of three isotherm models: namely the Langmuir, the Freundlich and the Temkin adsorption isotherms to model the equilibrium adsorption data. Another major focus of the work was the kinetic study, conducted to determine the rate of SDP adsorption and evaluation of which of the four kinetic models (pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, Elovich and Bhattacharya-Venkobachar) that best describes the adsorption process. Finally, material characterization and thermodynamic analyses were conducted to present the characteristic properties and energy changes associated with the adsorption study.

Materials and methods

Materials collection

Brewery effluent

Brewery effluent was obtained from a beer brewery at 9th Mile Corner Udi, Enugu Sate Nigeria and stored in black plastic container to preserve and further prevent changes in the characteristics of the effluent (Clesceri et al.1999).

C. Albidium seed shells

The precursor for the preparation of the bioadsorbents, C. albidium seed shells was obtained as a waste material from Nsugbe, Anambra State of Nigeria. Pretreatment of the shells by thorough washing with distilled water to remove the impurities was done and the washed sample dried in an air circulating oven at 40°C for 14 hours. The shell samples were blended, sieved and particles that ranged between 2 and 3 mm were obtained and stored in a desiccator for use in the experiments.

Two portions of the shell samples, of known weights, were immersed in 60% solutions of ammonium chloride and phosphoric acid, respectively, for 24 hours. The carbonization of the shell samples were carried out in a muffle furnace at 600°C for 4 hours, washed with distilled water to pH 7, dried at 110°C for 8 hours and subsequently sieved to desired diameter using standard sieves.

Materials characterization

Brewery effluent

Standard APHA methods, as reported by Clesceri et al. (1999), were applied to determine the physiochemical and biological characteristics of the effluent.

Bioadsorbent

The physical and chemical characterization of H3PO4-treated C. albidium sawdust carbon (ASAA) and NH4Cl-treated C. albidium sawdust carbon (ASAS), shown in Table 1, was performed using the methods described in 2.2.2.1 to 2.2.2.6.
Table 1

Characteristics of ASAA and ASAS

Parameters

ASAA

ASAS

BET Surface area (m2/g)

273.832

137.289

Total pore volume (cm3)

2.8810

2.100

Bulk density (g/cm3)

0.4777

0.5905

% Ash content

2.513

1.701

Oil content (%)

0.9651

0.9621

Moisture content (%)

2.741

2.742

Tapped bulk density
This property was determined according to the methods of Ortega-Rivas (2012). A given weight (w g) of the bioadsorbent sample which was dried at 110°C was put in 10 ml measuring cylinder. The bottom of the cylinder was tapped gently on the laboratory bench top until there was no further change in the sample level. The bulk density was then calculated using Eq. 1:
Bulk density = w v
(1)

where: w is weight of the dry material and v is volume of the dry material.

Percentage ash content
The determination of percent ash content of the samples were done by putting exactly 3 g each of the pre-dried bioadsorbent sample into pre-weighed crucibles and subsequently burnt in a muffle furnace at 650°C for 5 hours in the presence of air. Average value of three determinations was recorded and the percentage ash content was calculated using Eq. 2.
Ash content = W ash W sample 100
(2)

where: Wash is weight of ash and Wsample is weight of bioadsorbent sample.

Percentage moisture content
Exactly 3 g of the C. albidium seed shell (activated/carbonized) samples were weighed into pre-weighed crucible and the total weight taken. The samples were burnt at 105°C for 5 hours, removed from the oven, cooled and repeatedly heated and weighed after 1 hour until a constant weight was obtained. The % moisture content was determined using Eq. 3.
Moisture content = W sample W dry W sample 100
(3)

where: Wsample is the weight of bioadsorbent sample before drying, Wdry is weight of sample after drying.

Pore volume
A 3 g each of the bioadsorbent was weighed out. The samples were completely immersed in water and boiled until the air in the bioadsorbents had been displaced. The samples were then superficially dried and weighed. The pore volume was calculated using Eq. 4.
V pore = W inc ρ water 100
(4)

where: Vpore is pore volume of the bioadsorbent and W inc is weight increase of the bioadsorbent and ρ water is the density of water.

Surface area

Surface area was determined according to the modified methods of Kang et al. 2013. It was calculated from nitrogen gas adsorption isotherms based on Brunauer, Emmet and Teller (BET) method of surface area analysis (at 77.305 K) using Quantachrome 2.0 analyzer.

Physiochemical and instrumental characterization of bioadsorbent samples

Fourier transfer infrared analysis was carried out using Shimadzu FTIR 8400S spectrophotometer for the determination of functional groups present in ASAA and ASAS. The thermal behavior of the activated carbon was evaluated by thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric analyses using TGA-Q 50 and DSC-Q 200 models, respectively. The surface morphology of the activated carbon was visualized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a scanning electroscope model FEI-QUANTA 200. Physiochemical and instrumental characterization of the bioadsorbents were conducted using standard methods (Feng et al. 2010).

Adsorption experiments

Batch adsorption experiments were performed in Erlenmeyer flask according to the methods reported by Sivakumar and Palanisamy (2009) and Yeddou and Bensmaili (2005). In a typical experiment, 20 ml of effluent sample was mixed with the appropriate amount of adsorbents (types ASAA and ASAS) in the range of 10-50 g/l and then shaken for a period of time ranging from 5 to 60 min at 20 rev/s. The temperatures of adsorption measurements ranged between 20 and 30°C and the appropriate value was applied accordingly as required. The sample was then filtered using Whatman no 42 filter paper having fine porosity and particle retention of 2.5 micrometer at slow flow rate in a glass funnel. The filtered liquid was analyzed with respect to particle (SDP) content.

Analytical method

Filtrate from adsorbed BRE samples were taken at specified time range of 5–60 min, and then analyzed using a Spectronic (Milton Roy Company) 21 UV-visible spectrophotometer. The maximum uncertainty of the analytical methods was estimated at 5% level. The adsorption capacity, q t (mg/g), and the percentage SDP removal, % Rem, were calculated using Eqs. 5 and 6, respectively.
q t = C 0 C t D A
(5)
% Re m = C 0 C t C 0 .100
(6)

where: C 0 , C t and D A are initial constant effluent concentration (mg/l), effluent concentration at any time, t and adsorbent dose (g/l), respectively.

Results and discussion

Characterization of results

Physiochemical and biological characteristics

The results of the physiochemical and biological characteristics of the coagulated BRE, along with the regulatory standard (FEPA-Federal Environmental Protection Agency 1991), are presented in Table 2. The major characteristics (turbidity, total dissolved solid, total suspended solid, biological oxygen demand) contributing to the cloudiness of the fluid were relatively in low concentrations, but significant enough to promote adsorption process in the medium. Usually low concentration of contaminant is one of the key conditions that favor the application of adsorption (Meena et al. 2008; Yakubu et al. 2008). Meanwhile, the characteristics of adsorbents presented in Table 1 showed that ASAA had larger surface area/pore volume than the ASAS, an indication of likely better adsorptive performance of the former.
*Table 2

Characterization result of Brewery Effluent and FEPA standard

Parameters

Value

FEPA Limit

pH

2.4400

6-9

Turbidity (NTU)

39.0000

-

Total hardness (mg/l)

150.0000

-

Ca2+(mg/l)

47.2000

-

Mg2+(mg/l)

12.6000

-

Fe2+(mg/l)

0.1000

-

SO42-(mg/l)

65.2500

-

NO32-(mg/l)

0.1500

20

Cl(mg/l)

614.8089

<1

E.cond (μm/m2)

158.7000

400-800

TDS (mg/l)

8.8870

<2000

TSS (mg/l)

2.0900

15-30

T.Coliform

Nil

-

Plate Count

1.0000

-

E-Coli

Nil

-

BOD3

6.1405

10-50

*Based on standard APHA method: Clesceri et al. 1999.

FTIR spectra

The IR transmittance of UASS, ASAA and ASAS plotted against wave number is displayed in Figure 1. From the region of the transmittance peaks and notional structure of the UASS, ASAA and ASAS, it was possible to assign some of the functional groups. The FTIR spectrum of UASS shown in Figure 1a indicated distinct peaks at 3394.83 cm−1 (O-H stretch), 2929 cm−1(CH stretch shift), 2155.52 cm−1(C ≡ C stretch shift), 1733.1, 1639.55 cm−1(C = O stretch), 1518.99 cm−1(NO2 asymmetrical stretch), 1445.7-1377.2 cm−1(C-H scissoring and bending), 1247.99-1044.49 cm−1(C-N stretch). Noted was the possibility of existence of aromatic rings from the peaks observed between 1550 and 1600 cm−1; though N-H bonding, for example, from –NH2 and NH3+ moieties, has an absorption band in this region. Also, the stretching frequencies of N-H bonds could also be confused with those of O-H frequencies in the 3100 and 3600 cm−1 region. In addition, the broad bands between 2700 cm−1 and 2250 cm−1 are characteristics of amine groups in solid phase (>NH2+, etc.).
Figure 1

FTIR Spectra of (a): Precursor sample (UASS) (b): ASAA (c): ASAS.

The FTIR spectra of ASAA and ASAS are depicted in Figure 1b and c, respectively. For both figures, discernable peaks of note were recorded at 3991.82-3162.40 cm−1(O-H stretch/phenols), 3456.55 cm−1(O-H broad stretch/N-H medium stretch), 3060.17-2830.63 cm−1(O-H broad stretch), 1596.15-1595.16 cm−1(NO2 asymmetrical stretch), 1412.90 cm−1(C-H scissoring/bending), 1225.80 cm−1(C – N stretch/C-O stretch), 1220.98 cm−1(C-H/C-O stretches), 1100.43 cm−1(C-N/C-O stretches) and 814.95-819.77 cm−1 (C-H stretch bend).

The FTIR spectra of used adsorbents showed (Figures are not shown) discernable peaks (in cm−1) for used ASAA at 461(S-stretching), 803(C-H stretch/NH2 wagging and twisting), 1084.03 (second overtone N-H and O-H stretching), 1419.66 (first overtone N-H and O-H stretching), 1608.69(pyridine C-N),3443.05 (primary NH2 asymmetric stretching), and for used ASAA at 389 (aliphatic P compound), 469 (S-stretching), 880.53/1101.39(aromatic P-O stretching), 1450.52/1573.97(C = C stretching), 3458.48(primary NH2),3633.05(O-H stretching).

The FTIR results of bioadsorbent precursor (Figure 1a), ASAA (Figure 1b), ASAS (Figure 1c) and used adsorbents indicated that some peaks were shifted or disappeared, and that new peaks were also detected. These changes observed in the spectra represent interactive effects due to involvement of those functional groups during production and use of the adsorbents. The changes observed in the peaks of the adsorbents after usage could be concluded to be the direct result of adsorptive uptake of SDP from the BRE by the adsorbents. The varying number of absorption peaks displayed by the samples reflected the complex nature of these materials (Hameed and El-Khaiary 2008; Chemistry Department at Colorado University CDCU 2002; Graham et al.2008).

DSC and TGA

The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves for ASAA and ASAS are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. DSC is a thermo analysis in which the difference in the amount of heat required to increase the temperature of a sample to that of reference is measured as a function of temperature. By observing the difference in heat flow between the samples and reference, DSC was able to measure the amount of heat absorbed or released during phase transition (Gill et al.2010). TGA is based on mass measurement of mass loss of material as a function of temperature. The loss of weight could result from chemical reaction (decomposition, combustion) and physitransition (evaporation, desorption, drying) (Vyazovkin 2012)
Figure 2

Graph of: (a) DSC and (b) TGA of ASAA.

Figure 3

Graph of: (a) DSC and (b) TGA of ASAS.

As indicated in Figures 2a and 3a, DSC was used to characterize the phase transition that occurred in ASAA and ASAS over the temperature range of 25-277°C. Figure 2a revealed a sharp thermal transition in the temperature range of 125-150°C with transition enthalpy of 250 kJ/kg. Figure 3a indicated sharp transition in the temperature range of 112.5-138°C with transition enthalpy of 819.9 kJ/kg. This behavior by both ASAA and ASAS could be attributed to the de-stringing and coiling of carbon chain leading to spontaneous densification (Ramani et al.2012). The densification of the aggregated mass occurred at 175-180°C and 150-175°C for ASAA (Figure 2a) and ASAS (Figure 3a), respectively without absorption of thermal energy. In other words, the heat flow discs indicated exothermicity.

The thermal decomposition behaviors of the bioadsorbents are illustrated in Figures 2b and 3b for ASAA and ASAS, respectively. Figure 2b shows that ASAA lost weight by 11.17% and 15.18% at 120.63°C and 562.65°C, respectively. For Figure 3b, the weight loss of 10.75, 15.63 and 19.65% were recorded for 135.04, 517.16 and 649.84°C, respectively. For both Figures 2b and 3b, the initial weight loss could be attributed to the internal moisture and gaseous loss from the matrix molecules of the adsorbents (Ramani et al.2012). The second phase weight loss may be attributed to the decomposition of the labile component in the adsorbent. The results presented in Figures 2 and 3 conclusively suggested operational stability of the adsorbents.

SEM image

Scanning electron micrographs of ASAA and ASAS are shown in Figure 4a and b, respectively. The micrographs in Figure 4 appear to be dark field, with illuminations dotted in the matrix. Both figures seem to be rough, with protrusions quite prevalent in the biomass. High level of porosity was observed on both ASAA and ASAS. However, the ASAA were relatively more porous than the ASAS. In addition, higher levels of blunted sponge-like protrusions (Kang et al.2013) were observed in ASAA when compared to ASAS. This was probable reason for relative better performance of ASAA when compared to ASAS. The more heterogeneous pores in ASAA ensured good possibility for the SDP to be trapped and adsorbed. The BET surface area values for the ASAA supported the apparent more heterogeneous porosity in ASAA. The BET surface areas for ASAA and ASAS were 273.832 and 137.289 m2/g, respectively.
Figure 4

SEM images of (a) ASAA (b) ASAS.

Influence of contact time and adsorbent dosage on adsorptive removal of SDP from BRE

The results for adsorptive removal of SDP with respect to time and adsorbent doses are shown in Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 over the range of 10–50 g/l. Figures 5 and 6 indicated that SDP removal increased with increase in adsorbent dosage. From the profiles of the Figs., the particle retention increased rapidly and tended towards constant after equilibrium time of 30 min for both ASAA (Figure 5) and ASAS (Figure 6). From Figure 5, the percentage removal recorded for ASAA at 10 g/l were 60.5978 and 69.8369% for the time of 5 and (30–60) min, respectively. For ASAA (Figure 5) at 50 g/l, 63.3152 and 74.1168% were recorded for 5 and (30–60) min, respectively. Similar trends were depicted in Figure 6 (ASAS) where 52.4456 and 66.1005% were achieved for time of 5 and (30–60) min, respectively at 10 g/l dose. For 50 g/l ASAS dose, 55.095 and 67.527% removal were achieved at 5 and (30–60) min, respectively. The results demonstrated that ASAA performed better than the ASAS at the conditions of this experiment.
Figure 5

Influence of contact time and varying ASAA dose on the % removal of SDP from BRE (BRE volume =20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH, original temperature = 25°C).

Figure 6

Influence of contact time and varying ASAS dose on the % removal of SDP from BRE (BRE volume =20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH, original temperature = 25°C).

Figure 7

Influence of contact time and varying ASAA dose on the adsorptive capacity (BRE volume =20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH, original temperature = 25°C).

Figure 8

Influence of contact time and varying ASAAS dose on the adsorptive capacity (BRE volume =20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH, original temperature = 25°C.

The observed adsorption dynamic profiles depicted by Figures 5 and 6 can be divided into three regimes (Ncibi et al.2008): (i) a linear increase in adsorption with time, (ii) a transition regime where the rate of adsorption levels off, and (iii) a plateau regime. First regime (initial steep slope) indicated instantaneous adsorption (overshoot phenomena) ability of effluent particles onto the surface of the adsorbents. The second regime indicated a phase of gradual attainment of equilibrium where the apparent fall in SDP adsorption rate might be due to utilization of active sites on adsorbents surface. Plateau regime indicated phase where equilibrium had been achieved (Mohan et al.2007).

One general phenomenon was the perceived increase in SDP uptake with increase in adsorbent dose. It should also be observed that the % Rem for doses considered in Figures 5 and 6 ranged closely; with only apparent difference noticed for 50 g/l (Figure 5). This could be attributed to the greater availability of close number of exchangeable sites or surfaces in the adsorbents (Meena et al.2008). Following optimal results obtained at 50 g/l and 30 min, the rest of the work was carried out at the stated results, unless otherwise indicated.

Figures 7 and 8, present results similar to Figures 5 and 6 in respect of the variation of adsorption capacity q t (mg/g) with contact time and adsorbent dose. It was evident that q t increases with decreasing adsorbent dose and increasing contact time before leveling-off. The highest and lowest q t were recorded at 10 and 50 g/l, respectively for both ASAA (Figure 7) and ASAS (Figure 8). In specific terms, q t at 10 g/l increased from 9.812 to11.308 mg/g for 5 and (30–60) min, respectively as shown in Figure 7. Also, the q t at 50 g/l ASAA increased from 2.0504 to 2.4002 mg/g for 5 and (30–60) min, respectively. Figure 8 indicated that qt at 10 mg/l recorded increment from 8.4920 to 10.703 mg/g for 5 and (30–60) min, respectively while that of 50 g/l increased from 1.7842 to 2.1868 mg/g for 5 and (30–60) min, respectively. The results indicated also that the ASAA performed better than ASAS.

The apparent decrease in adsorption density (amount adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent) with increase in adsorbent dose was due to progressive unsaturation of adsorption sites through the adsorption reaction. Another reason might be due to the particle interaction, such as aggregation, usually resulting from high adsorbent concentration. Such aggregation would lead to decrease in total surface area of the adsorbent and on increase in the diffusional path length (Shukla et al.2002). Particle interaction might also desorb some of the adsorbate that was only loosely and reversibly bound to the adsorbent surface.

Influence of temperature on the adsorptive removal of SDP from BRE

The removal of SDP from BRE onto ASAA and ASAS was investigated at following conditions: temperatures of 20, 25 and 30°C, 50 g/l adsorbent dose and contact time of 30 min. The effects, represented for only 20 and 30°C, are illustrated by the results in Figure 9. The Figure indicated that the percentage removal of SDP increased for ASAA and ASAS as the temperature of the system increased. Figure 10 shows the results obtained at 20, 25 and 30°C for the final SDP uptake from BRE onto ASAA and ASAS at 30 min of contact time. Quantitatively, at 20°C, 65.683 and 70.76% SDP removal were achieved for 5 and 30 min, respectively for ASAA (Figure 9). For ASAA at 30°C, 68.74 and 77.21% were obtained for 5 and 30 min, respectively. Results obtained for ASAS (Figure 9) indicated that 65.021 and 69.12% were recorded for 5 and 30 min, respectively at 20°C. At 30°C, ASAS recorded 67.02 and 74.100% for 5 and 30 min, respectively. Figure 10 indicated that when the temperature of BRE is placed at 20, 25 and 30°C, the ultimate achievable percentage of SDP removal in respect of ASAA, were 70.76, 75.10 and 77.21%, respectively. In respect of ASAS, the SDP removal achieved at 20, 25 and 30°C were 69.12, 71.13 and 74.10%, respectively.
Figure 9

Influence of temperature on the % removal of SDP from BRE onto ASAS and ASAA (adsorbent dose = 50 g/l, BRE volume = 20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH, contact time = 30 min).

Figure 10

Influence of temperature on removal efficiency of SDP on to ASAS and ASAA at contact time of 30 min (adsorbent dose = 50 g/l, BRE volume =20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, initial BRE pH).

Both Figures 9 and 10 indicated that the retention of SDP by the adsorbents increased while the temperature and time increased. The perceived increase of SDP uptake with temperature might be due to the acceleration of some originally slow adsorption steps or the creation of some active sites on the adsorbent surface (Hashem 2007; Nasssar and Magdy 1999). The enhanced mobility of SDP from the bulk solutions towards the adsorbent surface should also be taken into account (Hashem 2007; Yubin et al.1998). Increased temperature encouraged the process of agglomeration and widening adsorbent pore resulting in certain activation of the surface of the solid support (Larous et al.2005). Obtained results indicated clearly that the adsorption process under study was an endothermic process. This fact was illustrated in Section 3.6. Results similar to the one of this study had been reported by Khalid and Ahmad (1998).

Influence of pH on the adsorptive removal of SDP from BRE

The pH of the aqueous solution was a vital controlling factor in the adsorption process and thus the impact of pH has been studied in the range of 2–8 as depicted graphically in Figure 11. As a general trend, the increase in pH, increased adsorption in a very determined sense, until a certain pH limit, beyond which the process became steady. This pH limit could be regarded as the optimal value.
Figure 11

Influence of pH on the adsorption of SDP from BRE on to ASAS and ASAA (adsorbent dose = 50 g/l, BRE volume = 20 ml, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l, Temperature 30°C, contact time = 30 min).

In quantitative terms, the percentage SDP removal increased with pH from 2 to about 6.95 and remained unchanged thereafter. In respect of ASAA and ASAS, the SDP removal increased from 69.5768% at pH 2 to 73.0839% at pH 6.95 and 66.3161% at pH 2 to 70.4231% at pH 6.95, respectively. At pH greater than 6.95, the SDP removal remained constant till pH 8. The gentle decrease at about pH 3–6 of the initial rapid adsorption of SDP was presumed to be due to competitive adsorption between hydrogen ion and particles of the BRE. The adsorption at near neutral pH values could be attributed to the cellulose component of adsorbents where site binding adsorption might be occurring. This could be due to surface complex phenomena of functional groups present in the adsorbent (Hashem 2007; Menkiti et al. 2011a).

Graphical results of Figure 11 could be linked strongly to the influence of pH, in addition to the functional groups on the adsorbent and their ionic state at a particular pH (Mohan et al.2007; Genc et al. 2003). Equally, the apparent increment in adsorption with pH was believed to result from corresponding increase in the number of negatively charged sites. Consequently, the electrostatic attraction between the negative surface and the cationic BRE molecules increased with pH and reached saturation at about pH 6.95. Sivakumar and Palanisamy (2009) and Noroozi et al. (2007)) had reported similar results for the adsorption of basic red 29 onto Euphorbia antiquorum L and BR 41 onto silkworm pupa, respectively.

Equilibrium isothermic analysis

The study of the adsorption isotherm is fundamental (Gräf et al. 2012), and played an important role in determination of the maximal capacity of adsorption, in addition to development of an equation which accurately represented the results that could be used for design purposes. Three equilibrium isotherms were analyzed: Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin.

The Langmuir isotherm is arguably the best known of all isotherms describing adsorption. It applies to the cases of adsorption on completely homogenous surfaces where interactions between adsorbed molecules are negligible. The Freundlich isotherm is the earliest known relationship describing the adsorption isotherm. This empirical isotherm applies fairly well when describing the adsorption in dilute aqueous solution systems. Temkin isotherm applies on the bases that a fall in heat of sorption is linear rather than logarithmic as obtained in Freundlich equation. Heat of sorption of all molecules in the layer would decrease linearly with coverage due to sorbate- sorbent interactions (Larous et al.2005; Sujatha et al.2008).

The study under consideration for the equilibrium adsorption of SDP from BRE onto ASAA and ASAS were conducted at 20, 25 and 30°C. In order to evaluate the nature of the adsorption process, the obtained equilibrium data were fitted into Langmuir isotherm (Eq. Seven, Langmuir 1918); Freundlich isotherm (Eq. Eight, Freundlich 1906) and Temkin isotherm (Eq. Nine, Adouby et al.2007). Where applicable, both linear and non-linear mathematical expressions of the models and plots made are presented without details in Table 3.
Table 3

Isotherm mathematical model equations used for adsorption data analysis

Models

  Non-linear form

      Linear form

  Plot made

Equation number

Langmuir

q e = q max K L C e 1 + K L C e ·

1 q e = 1 K L q max 1 C e + 1 q max ·

1 q e vs . 1 C e

(7)

Freundlich

q e = K F C e 1 n ·

1 n q e = 1 n K F + 1 n 1 n C e ·

1 n q e vs .1 n C e

(8)

Temkin

     -

q e = RT b T 1 n K T + RT bT 1 n C e ·

q e vs .1 n C e ·

(9)

The various isotherm parameters were determined from the corresponding slopes and intercepts. The level of accuracy of the models under study with experimental data was determined based on the squared linear regression coefficients (R2) and sum of the square error SSE (%). The higher is the value of R2 and the lower is the value of SSE; the better will be the goodness of fit. The expression for the evaluation of (SSE%) is presented as Eq. 10.
SSE % = q exp q ecalc 2 0.5
(10)
The results of the Temkin, Freundlich and Langmuir constants and associated error calculations are presented in Table 4. Temkin isotherm with R2 < 0.480 has poor fit, thus no further consideration of the model was attempted. Hence, the equilibrium data obtained at 20°C, 25°C and 30°C have been shown (in the light of Langmuir and Freundlich Equations) as points, respectively, in Figure 12a to c for ASAA and Figure 13a to c for ASAS. The fit of the data (R2 > 0.99 and SSE < 0.10, Table 4) were found to be very well explained by the Langmuir isotherm. Thus, it could be generalized that the adsorption of SDP under the experimental conditions took place with the predominated Langmuir characteristics for the three temperatures under consideration. The adsorption capacity values, q m for both ASAA and ASAS at the three temperatures were found to increase with increasing temperature. Similar trend was recorded for Langmuir constant KL and Freundlich constant, Kf (ASAS). In respect of Langmuir isotherm, such a trend emphasized the homogeneity of the surface binding sites on the adsorbent (ASAA and ASAS) biomass towards BRE particles.
Figure 12

Isotherm modeling at optimum conditons for the adsorption of SDP from BRE on to ASAA at: (a) 20°C, (b) 25°C, and (c) 30°C.

Figure 13

Isotherm modeling at optimum conditons for the adsorption of SDP from BRE on to ASAS at: (a) 20°C, (b) 25°C, and (c) 30°C.

Table 4

Isotherm parameters obtained from SDP adsorption on ASAA and ASAS at pH of 6.95, DA=50g/l, C 0 = 161.92 mg/l

Adsorbent

Temperature (°C)

Langmuir

Freudlich

Temkin

  

qmax(mg/g)

KL(l/mg)

R2

RL

SSE (%)

KF(l/mg)

n

R2

SSE (%)

bT(KJ/mol)

KT(l/g)

R2

SSE (%)

ASAA

20

2.110

1.011

0.9916

0.0600

0.091

0.0810

2.801

0.893

1.041

7.221

13.381

0.2011

143.300

 

25

2.300

1.039

0.9934

0.0059

0.096

0.807

2.914

0.891

2.213

6.483

450.969

0.3800

121.770

 

30

2.500

1.060

0.9941

0.0570

0.093

0.800

2.900

0.896

1.881

4.017

5.891

0.1220

109.810

ASAS

20

2.100

1.001

0.9910

0.0061

0.093

0.790

2.900

0.839

1.371

6.121

13.314

0.1010

133.410

 

25

2.150

1.020

0.9910

0.0060

0.098

0.830

2.780

0.771

2.710

3.874

17.967

0.4750

141.410

 

30

2.300

1.050

0.9914

0.0584

0.096

0.950

2.780

0.799

2.011

2.212

170.331

0.1220

188.014

To confirm the favorability of the adsorption system, the dimensionless Hall separation factor, RL was calculated by using Eq. 11 (Ruthsen 1984).
R L = 1 + K L C 0 1
(11)

R L indicates the shape of the isotherm. This is: (i) unfavorable when R L  > 1, (ii) linear when R L  = 1 (iii) favorable when 0 < R L  < 1, and (iv) irreversible when R L  = 0. The calculated R L values for the two adsorbents, shown in Table 4 were all in the range of 0–1, which confirmed that adsorption process was favorable within the studied experimental conditions.

In respect of Freundlich isotherm, favorability of the process is achieved if n lies in range of 1–10. Based on the values of Freundlich constant (n) displayed in Table 4, the present adsorption system could be considered favorable since n values lie between 1and 10 for all cases studied.

Thermodynamic analyses of adsorption isotherm data

One way to elucidate the adsorption mechanism of SDP on the adsorbents was to calculate the thermodynamic parameters. These parameter estimates, evaluated the feasibility and exothermic nature of the adsorption process. Such parameters: standard free energy (ΔG˚), enthalpy (ΔH˚) and entropy change (ΔS˚) were obtained at 20, 25 and 30°C using binding Langmuir constant, K L for the adsorption of SDP onto ASAA and ASAS. The three parameters were individually calculated using Eqs. 12–14.
Δ G = RT ln K L
(12)
Δ H = R T 2 T 1 T 2 T 1 ln K L 2 K L 1
(13)
Δ S = Δ H Δ G T
(14)
The Gibbs free energy indicated the degree of spontaneity of the adsorption process and the higher negative values reflect more energetically favorable adsorption. The thermodynamic parameters evaluated for 20, 25 and 30°C are presented in Table 5. As shown, the negative values of ΔG˚ indicated the spontaneous nature of the adsorption process for both ASAA and ASAS. The positive values of ΔH˚ indicated that the adsorption was endothermic while the positive values of ΔS˚ pointed to an increased disorder of the system due to loss of the water which surrounded the BRE particles while adsorbing at the adsorbent (Suteu and Bilba 2005). Furthermore, it could be suggested that the driving force for adsorption was an entropic effect. This observation was reported by Wong et al. (2004) in earlier experimental results concerning organic adsorption mechanism.
Table 5

Thermodynamic parameters for SDP on ASAA and ASAS

Adsorbent

Temperature (°C)

ΔG (KJmol−1)

ΔH (KJmol−1)

ΔS (KJmol−1)

ASAA

20

−0.0266

3.5196

25

−0.0732

3.493

3.566

30

−0.1467

3.6397

ASAS

20

−0.0266

2.5037

25

−0.0491

2.4771

2.5262

30

−0.1229

2.6000

Table 5 shows that ΔG˚ values were increasingly negative with temperature, which indicated the increasing feasibility and spontaneity of the adsorption process. The adsorption of SDP onto ASAA was greater than that of SDP onto ASAS overall. Also, from Table 5, the values of ΔS˚ are increasingly positive with temperature, an indication of increasing randomness of solid–liquid interface with increasing temperature (Debnath and Ghosh 2008). From the table, the values of ΔH° recorded for ASAA and ASAS are 3.493 kJ/mole and 2.477 kJ/mole, respectively. The values are found to be less than 40 kJ/mole which indicated that physisorption dominated the adsorption of SDP onto ASAA and ASAS. The present results are found to follow similar trend with the results reported by Patel and Suresh (2008) on the biosorption of reactive black 5 dyes by Aspergillus foetidus.

Surface packing, surface charge and hopping number

To further account for the adsorption behavior of the SDP onto acid treated (ASAA) and salt treated (ASAS) biomasses as a result of surface modification, the packing of SDP on the biomass surface was evaluated. This involved thermodynamic analysis of adsorption potential, adsorption density at a fixed temperature (30°C) and initial adsorbate concentration (161.920 mg/l). The adsorption potential, A and the adsorption density, Γ, were obtained by calculation using Eqs. 15 and 16, respectively (Horsfall and Spiff 2005).
A = RT ln C 0 C e
(15)
Γ = Zr C e exp Δ G ads R
(16)

where: C o and C e are initial and equilibrium concentrations in mg/cm3, Γ is the adsorption density in mg/m2, Z = 4 is the valency of organic carbon, which is a major constitutent (Driessen and Vereijken 2003; Kanagachandran and Jayaratne 2006; Janhom et al. 2009; Menkiti 2010) of SDP in the BRE, r = 0.70 ×10- 9 m is the effective radius of the organic carbon enriched-SDP reported elsewhere (Crystalmarker 2014; United States Environmental Protection Agency USEPA 1999), R is gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature (K).

The graphical representations are depicted in Figure 14. The adsorption potential for both ASAA and ASAS increased with increment in adsorption density. However, adsorption potential values for acid treated adsorbent (ASAA) were higher than the salt treated biomass (ASAS). The higher uptake of SDP observed for ASAA was primarily due to the association of phosphoric acid group. Acid treatment significantly enhanced the adsorption potential of the biomass, which meant an increased adsorption density on the ASAA.
Figure 14

Adsorption potential vs. adsorption density.

Adsorption behavior arising from the adsorbent modification could be viewed from the aspect of vacant sites. The probability of finding vacant sites on the adsorbent surface was correlated by number of hopping (n) done by the BRE particles before sticking on an adsorption site. The expressions relating the number of hopping (n) and that of surface coverage are given in Eqs. 17 and 18 (Higachi et al.1984; Horsfall and Spiff 2005).
n = 1 1 θ θ
(17)
θ = 1 C e C 0
(18)
Plot of surface coverage (θ) against hopping number (n) was made and depicted in Figure 15. The figure indicates that the migration of SDP to the vacant sites on the adsorbent surface increased with increase in surface coverage. The smaller the hopping number, the faster adsorption occurred. The difference observed in θ and n for the ASAA and ASAS (Figure 14) indicated the ease with which ASAA found binding site when compared with ASAS. This could attributed to the association of phosphoric acid group in ASAA.
Figure 15

Surface coverage vs. Hopping number (n).

Adsorption kinetic analysis

Kinetic and equilibrium data are pertinent in the evaluation of adsorption dynamics and by extension, the optimization of residence time for the uptake of SDP on ASAA and ASAS. Adsorption kinetics could be controlled by several independent processes (bulk diffusion, film diffusion, chemical reaction, intra-particle diffusion, temperature, pH, etc.) that could act in series or in parallel (Abia and Asuquo 2006). In order to investigate the kinetic of BRE adsorption on ASAA and ASAS, the data obtained at 30°C have been analyzed by pseudo first order(PFO) (Langergren 1898, Eq. Nineteen), pseudo second order(PSO) (Ho and Mckays 1999, Eq. Twenty); Elovich (Chien and Clayton 1980, Eq. Twenty-one) and Bhattacharya – Venkobachar (BVM) (Bhattacharya and Venkobachar 1984, Equation Twenty-two) kinetic model equations and subsequently subjected to accuracy tests via R2 and SSE (Eq. 6).

The mathematical linear forms of the equations used and the plots made for analyzing the data have been given without details in Table 6. The associated kinetic parameters have been determined from the intercepts and slopes of the respective linear plots (graphs omitted) of the kinetic equations. The evaluated kinetic parameters are shown in Table 7. The results indicated that among the four kinetic models evaluated, pseudo second order model generated the best fit with the adsorption kinetic data of the investigated system. All the correlation coefficients obtained were greater than 0.99. The pseudo first order equation showed next good fit with the adsorption data, followed by the Elovich model. Lastly, Bhattacharya–Venkobachar (BVM) with R2< 0 depicted the worst fit. It could be presumed from the present data, that ASAA kinetically had a better result than ASAS in respect of pseudo first order and pseudo second order.
Table 6

The kinetic equations used for analysis of kinetic data

Kinetic equation

    Linear form

   Plot made

Equation number

PFO

ln(q e  − q t ) = ln q e  − K1t

ln(q e  − q t ) vs. Time

(19)

PSO

t q t = 1 K 2 2 q e 2 + t q e

t q t vs . Time

(20)

Elovich

q t = 1 β ln αβ + 1 β ln t

q t vs. Time

(21)

BVM

ln[1 − (U)T] = K B t

ln[1 − (U)T] vs. Time

(22)

Table 7

Kinetic parameters of the adsorption process at 30°C ,pH 6.95, D A = 50 g/l , C 0 = 161.92 mg/l

Kinetic model

Parameter

Adsorbent variant

  

ASAA

ASAS

PFO

K1(/min)

0.0218

0.0424

 

qe

0.7044

0.6017

 

R2

0.9968

0.9624

 

SSE(%)

0.1542

0.1550

PSO

K2(g/mg.min)

0.2809

0.3462

 

qe(mg/g)

1.6920

1.6233

 

R2

0.9986

0.9984

 

SSE(%)

0.1477

0.1473

Elovich

α (mg/g.min)

39.4302

102.4312

 

β (mg/g.min)

5.5309

6.4184

 

R2

0.9895

0.9752

 

SSE(%)

0.3011

0.3101

BVM

KB(/min)

−0.0922

−0.0681

 

R2

−0.7053

−4.4455

 

SSE(%)

163.1241

169.3247

Conclusion

African star apple shell biomass (ASAA and ASAS) was able to adsorb SDP from brewery effluent (BRE). The removal of SDP from BRE using ASAA and ASAS was a function of contact time, bioadsorbent dosage, temperature and pH. Adsorption capacity increased with increasing temperature. The optimum SDP removals were achieved at pH 6.95, 50 g/l dose and 30°C. Among the isotherm models considered, equilibrium data fitted the Langmuir model best within the studied experimental conditions. The kinetic data agreed very well with the pseudo-second order equation. The calculated thermodynamics parameters showed that the related adsorption systems were favorable, endothermic and spontaneous for both ASAA and ASAS.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the underlisted organizations for their assistance towards the completion of this work:

1. Chemical Engineering Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

2. Scientific Equipment Development Institute, Enugu, Nigeria.

3. National Research Institute for Chemical Technology, Zaria, Nigeria.

4. Central Leather Research Institute, Chennai, India.

5. Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, India.

6. India National Science Academy/Center for International Cooperation in Science, India.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University
(2)
Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University
(3)
Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria
(4)
Department of Chemistry, University of Pretoria
(5)
Center for Environmental Management and Control, University of Nigeria

References

  1. Abia AA, Asuquo ED: Lead(II) and Nickel(II) adsorption kinetics from aqueous metal solution using chemically modified and unmodified agricultural adsorbents. Afr J Biotechnol 2006, 5(16):1475-1482.Google Scholar
  2. Adouby K, Akissi LC, Wandan NE, Yao B: Removal of heavy metals (Pb2+, Cu2+) in aqueous solutions by Pterygota macrocarpa sawdust. J Appl Sci 2007, 7(14):1864-1872.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad AA, Hameed BH, Aziz N: Adsorption of direct dye on palm ash: kinetics and equilibrium modeling. J Hazard Mater 2007, 141: 70-76. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.094View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Amirnia S, Margaritis A, Ray M: Adsorption of mixtures of toxic metal ions using non-viable cells of saccharomyces cerevisiae . Adsorpt Sci Technol 2012, 30: 43-64. 10.1260/0263-6174.30.1.43View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Asasian N, Kaghazchi T: A comparison on efficiency of virgin and sulfurized agro-based adsorbents for mercury removal from aqueous systems. Adsorption 2013, 19(1):189-200. 10.1007/s10450-012-9437-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bada SO: Preliminary Information on the Ecology of Chrysophyllum Albidium in West and Central Africa. In Proceeding of National Workshop on the Potential of the Star Apple in Nigeria. Edited by: Denton OA, Ladipo DO, Adetoro MA, Sarumi MB. Ibadan, Nigeria: CENRAD; 1997:16-25.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya AK, Venkobachar C: Removal of cadmium (II) by low cost adsorbents. J Environ Eng 1984, 110(1):110-122. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:1(110)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chemistry Department at Colorado University (CDCU): Boulder. In Infrared Spectroscopy: Theory. USA: Handbook for organic chemistry lab, Chapter 15; 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Chien SH, Clayton WR: Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption on soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1980, 44: 256-268.Google Scholar
  10. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD: Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. 20th edition. USA: APHA; 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Crystalmarker: Elements, Atomic Radii and the Periodic Table. 2014. http://www.crystalmaker.com/support/tutorials/crystalmaker/atomic-radii/index.html., Accessed 15th February, 2014Google Scholar
  12. Deans JR, Dioxn BG: Uptake of Pb2+ and Cu2+ by novel biopolymer. Water Res 1992, 26(4):469-472. 10.1016/0043-1354(92)90047-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Debnath S, Ghosh UC: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamics for Cr(III) and Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solutions by crystalline hydrous titanium oxide. J Chem Thermodyn 2008, 40: 67-77. 10.1016/j.jct.2007.05.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Driessen W, Vereijken T: Recent Development in Biological Treatment of Brewery Effluent. Living Stone, Zambia: The Institute and Guild of Brewing Convention; 2003.http://www.environmental-expert.com/Files%5C587%5Carticles%5C3041%5Cpaques24.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. Ejikeme PM, Okoye AI, Onukwuli OD: Kinetics and isotherm studies of Cu2+ and Pb2+ ions removal from simulated waste water by Gambeya albida seed shell activated carbon. Afr Rev Phys (Afr Phys Rev) 2011, 6: 143-152.Google Scholar
  16. Feng Y, Gong J, Zeng G, Niu Q, Zhang H, Niu C, Deng J, Yan M: Adsorption of Cd(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solutions using magnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticle as adsorbens. Chem Eng J 2010, 162: 487-494. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.049View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. FEPA-Federal Environmental Protection Agency: Guideline and Standards for Industrial Effluents, Gaseous Emissions and Hazardous Management in Nigeria. Nigeria: Lagos; 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Freundlich H: Adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 1906, 57: 385-470.Google Scholar
  19. Genc O, Yakinkaya Y, Buguktuncel M, Denilzilla A, Bektas S: Uranium recovery by immobilized and dried powered biomass, characterization and comparison. Int J Miner Processes 2003, 68: 93-107. 10.1016/S0301-7516(02)00062-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill P, Moghadam T, Ranjbar B: Differential scanning calorimetry techniques: applications in biology and nanoscience. J Biomol Technol 2010, 21(4):167-193.Google Scholar
  21. Gräf T, Pasel C, Luckas M, Bathen D: Adsorption of aromatic trace compounds from organic solvents on activated carbons—experimental results and modeling of adsorption equilibria. Adsorption 2012, 18(2):127-141. 10.1007/s10450-012-9388-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham N, Gang F, Fowler G, Watts M: Characterisation and coagulation performance of tannin-based cationic polymer: a preliminary assessment. Colloids Surf A Physiochemical Eng Aspects 2008, 327: 9-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Grini G: Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in waste water treatment. Prog Polym Sci 2005, 30: 38-70. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.11.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hameed BH, El-Khaiary MI: Removal of basic dye from aqueous medium using a novel agricultural wase maerial: pumpkin seed hull. J Hazard Mater 2008, 155: 601-609. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hashem MA: Adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solution by okra wastes. Int J Phys Sci 2007, 2(7):178-184.Google Scholar
  26. Higachi K, Ito H, Oishi I: Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984:71-73.Google Scholar
  27. Ho YS, Mckays G: Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 1999, 34: 451-465. 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Horsfall M, Spiff AI: Effect of 2-mercapto ethanoic acid treatment of fluted pumpkin waste ( Telfaria occidentalis Hook .F.) on the sorption Ni2+ ions from aqueous solution. J Sci Ind Res 2005, 64: 613-620.Google Scholar
  29. Janhom T, Wattanachira S, Pavasant P: Characterization of brewery wastewater with spectrofluorometry analysis. J Environ Manage 2009, 90: 1184-1190. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jiang Y, Qi H, Zhang X, Chen G: Inorganic impurity removal from waste oil and wash-down water by Acinetobacter johnsonii . J Hazard Mater 2012, 239–240: 289-293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanagachandran K, Jayaratne R: Utilization potential of brewery waste water sludge as an organic fertilizer. J Inst Brew 2006, 112(2):92-96. 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2006.tb00236.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kang YL, Poon MY, Monash P, Ibrahim S, Saravanan P: Surface chemistry and adsorption mechanism of cadmium ion on activated carbon derived from Garcinia mangostana shell. Korean J Chem Eng 2013, 30(10):1904-1910. 10.1007/s11814-013-0130-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Khalid N, Ahmad S: Removal of lead from aqueous solution using rice husk. Sep Sci Technol 1998, 33: 15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Khuo-Omoregbe DIO, Kuipa PK, Hove M: An assessment of the quality of liquid effluents from opaque beer brewing plants in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Water SA 2005, 3(1):141-149.Google Scholar
  35. Langergren S: About the theory of so called adsorption of soluble substances. Kung Sven Veten Hand 1898, 24: 1-39.Google Scholar
  36. Langmuir I: The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 1918, 40: 1361-1368. 10.1021/ja02242a004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Larous S, Meniai H, Bencheikh M, Lehocine M: Experimental study of the removal of copper from aqueous solution by adsorption using sawdust. Desalination 2005, 185: 483-490. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.090View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Meena AK, Kadirvelu K, Mishra GK: Adsorption removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by treated sawdust ( Acacia arabica) . J Hazard Mater 2008, 150: 604-611. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Menkiti MC: Sequential Treatments of Coal Washery and Brewery Effluents by Biocoag-Flocculation and Activated Carbon Adsorption, Ph.D. Dissertation. Nigeria: Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka; 2010.Google Scholar
  40. Menkiti MC, Onukwuli OD: Coag-flocculation studies of Moringa oleifera coagulant (MOC) in brewery effluent: Nephelometric approach. J Am Sci 2010, 6(12):788-806.Google Scholar
  41. Menkiti MC, Onukwuli OD: Response Surface Methodology and Kinetics Application to the Optimization Treatment of Brewery Waste Water by Afzelia Bella Coag-Flocculant. In Water: Ecological Disasters and Sustainable Development. Edited by: Egboka BC, Odoh BI. Germany: Lambert Press; 2011a:92-107.Google Scholar
  42. Menkiti MC, Onukwuli OD: Coag-flocculation of Mucuna seed coag-flocculant(MSC) in coal washery effluent(CWE) using light scattering effects. AICHE J 2011b, 58(4):1303-1307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Menkiti MC, Onyechi CA, Onukwuli OD: Evaluation of perikinetics compliance for the coag-flocculation of brewery effluent by Brachystegia eurycoma seed extract. Int J Multidiscip Sci Eng 2011a, 2(6):77-83.Google Scholar
  44. Menkiti MC, Chime TO, Onukwuli OD: Bioadsorption of suspended and dissolved particles from coal washery effluent onto fluted pumpkin seed shell biomass. World J Eng 2011b, 8(2):179-190. 10.1260/1708-5284.8.2.179View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Mohan SV, Ramaniah SV, Sarmar PN: Biosorption of direct azo dye from aqueous phase onto spirogyra spp. 102; Evaluation of kinetics and mechanistic aspects. Biochem Eng J 2007, 38: 61-69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Nasssar M, Magdy YH: Mass transfer during adsorption of basic dyes on clay in fixed bed. Indian Chem Eng Sect A 1999, 40(1):27-30.Google Scholar
  47. Ncibi MC, Borhane M, Mongi S: Adsorptive removal of anionic and non-ionic surfactants from aqueous phase using Posidona oceanica (L) marine biomass. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2008, 83: 77-83. 10.1002/jctb.1787View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Noroozi B, Sorial GA, Bahrami H, Arami M: Equilibrium and kinetic adsorption study of a cationic dye by a natural adsorbent-silk worm pupa. J Hazard Mater B 2007, 139: 167-174. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Oboh IO, Aluyor EO, Audu TOK: Use of Chrysophyllum albidium for removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions. Sci Res Essay 2009, 4(6):632-635.Google Scholar
  50. Onwu FK, Ogah SP: Studies on the effect of pH on the sorption of Cadmium(II), Nickel(II), Lead(II) and Chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions by African white star apple( Chrysophyllum albidium ) shell. Afr J Biotechnol 2010, 19(42):7086-7093.Google Scholar
  51. Ortega-Rivas E: Characterization and processing relevance of food particulate materials. Part Syst Characterization 2012, 29: 192-203. 10.1002/ppsc.201100016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Patel R, Suresh S: Kinetic and equilibrium studies on the biosorption of reactive black 5 dye by Aspergillus foetidus . Bioresour Technol 2008, 99: 51-58. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramani K, Jain SD, Mandal AB, Sekaran G: Microbial Induced lipoprotein biosurfactant from slaughterhouse lipid waste and its application to the removal of metal ions from aqueous solution. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 2012, 97: 254-263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruthsen DM: Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.Google Scholar
  55. Shukla A, Zhang Y, Dubey P, Margravel J, Shukla S: The role of saw dust in the removal of unwanted materials from water. J Hazard Mater B 2002, 95: 137-152. 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00089-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Sivakumar P, Palanisamy PN: Adsorption studies of basic red 29 by a non-conventional activated carbon prepared from Euphorbia antiquorum .L, Internationa . J Chem Technol Res 2009, 1(3):502-510.Google Scholar
  57. Sujatha M, Ageetha A, Sivakumar P, Palanisamy PN: Orthophosphoric acid activated babul seed carbon as an adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue. E-J Chem 2008, 5(4):742-753. 10.1155/2008/418267View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Suteu D, Bilba D: Equilibrium and kinetic study of reactive Dye brilliant Red HE-3B adsorption by activated charcoal. Acta Chim Slov 2005, 52: 73-79.Google Scholar
  59. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Guidiance Manual: Turbidity Provisions, PARTICLESCONTRIBUTINGTOTURBIDITY, Chapter8 Page2 EPA. 1999. , Accessed on 18 Feb 2014 http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mdbp/pdf/turbidity/chap_08.pdfGoogle Scholar
  60. Vyazovkin S: Thermogravimetric Analysis, Characterization of Materials. 2nd edition. USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2012:1-12.Google Scholar
  61. Wong YC, Szeto YS, Cheung WH, Mckay G: Pseudo‒first‒order kinetic studies of the sorption of acid dyes onto chitosan. J Appl Polym Sci 2004, 92: 1633-1645. 10.1002/app.13714View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. World Bank Group: Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook: Breweries. Washington DC: Environmental Department, World Bank Group; 1998:272-274.Google Scholar
  63. Yakubu MK, Gumel MS, Abdullahi AM: Use of activated carbon from date seeds to treat textile and tannery effluents. Afr J Sci Technol Sci Eng Ser 2008, 9(1):39-49.Google Scholar
  64. Yeddou N, Bensmaili A: Kinetic models for the sorption of dye from aqueous solution by clay-wood sawdust mixture. Desalination 2005, 185: 499-508. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.053View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Yubin T, Fangyan C, Honglin Z: Adsorption of Pb (II), Cu (II), and Zn (II) ions on to waste fluidized catalytic cracking catalyst. Adsorption Sci Technol 1998, 16(8):595-606.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Menkiti et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.