- Research
- Open Access

# Rotationally inelastic dynamics of LiH (X^{1}Σ^{+}, *v* = 0) in collisions with Ar: State-to-state inelastic rotational rate coefficients

- Aliou Niane
^{1}Email author, - Cheikh Amadou Bamba Dath
^{1}, - Ndèye Arame Boye Faye
^{1}, - Kamel Hammami
^{2}and - Nejm-Eddine Jaidane
^{2}

**Received:**21 November 2013**Accepted:**26 February 2014**Published:**14 April 2014

## Abstract

A theoretical study of rotational collision of LiH(X^{1}Σ^{+},*v* = 0, *J*) with Ar has been carried out. The *ab initio* potential energy surface (PES) describing the interaction between the Ar atom and the rotating LiH molecule has been calculated very accurately and already discussed in our previous work [Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 993 (2012) 20–25]. This PES is employed to evaluate the de-excitation cross sections. The *ab initio* PES for the LiH(X^{1}Σ^{+})-Ar(^{1}S) Van der waals system is calculated at the coupled-cluster [CCSD(T)] approximation for a LiH length fixed to an experimental value of 3.0139 bohrs. The basis set superposition error (BSSE) is corrected and the bond functions are placed at mid-distance between the center of mass of LiH and the Ar atom. The cross sections are then derived in the close coupling (CC) approach and rate coefficients are inferred by averaging these cross sections over a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of kinetic energies. The 11 first rotational levels of rate coefficients are evaluated for temperatures ranging from 10 to 300 K. We notice that the de-excitation rate coefficients appear large in the order 10^{−10} cm^{−3} s^{−1} and show very low temperature dependence. The rate coefficients magnify significantly the propensity toward ∆* J* = −1 transitions. These results confirm the same propensity already noted for the cross sections.

## Keywords

- PES
- CC approach
- Collision
- Cross-sections
- Rate coefficients

## Introduction

The analysis of atom diatom scattering of molecular collisions shows a field of current interest (Santiago *et* al. 2008; Aguillon *et* al. 2000). The rotational collisions between diatomic molecules and atomic partners give rise to complex energy transfer processes which provide one of the most rigorous tests of high-level *ab initio* potential energy surfaces (Paterson *et* al. 2011; Dagdigian *et* al. 1995, 1997; Eyles *et* al. 2011). The LiH molecule has much interest in atmospherical models (Dalgarno *et* al. 1996; Gianturco *et* al. 1999) thanks to its importance in chemistry of the lithium. These calculations of rate coefficients are stimulated by the studies of Ren *et* al. (2006) which have shown that the high-purity Ar atmosphere at room temperature contribute significantly to the stability of LiH in environment.

The collision dynamics of LiH(X^{1}Σ^{+}) with rare gas (Rg) has received particular attentions. Theoretically, the electronic structure methods, semi-empirical as well as *ab initio*, have been employed to calculate intermolecular potential energy surfaces to study the LiH in excited rotational levels by collision with the atoms H (Berriche and Tlili 2004; Berriche 2004), He (Gianturco *et* al. 1997a, 1997b; Bodo *et* al. 1998; Forni 1999) and Ne (Lu *et* al. 2000; Feng *et* al. 2004; Feng *et* al. 2005). These studies have shown the weakly van der Waals forces interacting molecular systems of LiH in its ground electronic state with Rg atoms. The competition between the charge transfer processes and the chemical binding have done that the interactions of van der Waals systems represent a critical test for the potential energy surfaces (PESs).

In our previous work for the LiH-Ar system, we have reported the first quantum mechanical close coupling calculations of integral cross sections for transitions between the lower rotational levels of LiH induced by collision with Ar based on the *ab initio* potential energy surface. We have used in all the calculations the *ab initio* coupled-cluster [CCSD(T)] level of theory and with aug-cc-pVQZ Gaussian basis set for the H and Ar atoms and cc-pVQZ Gaussian basis set for the Li atom.

## Interaction potential energy surface

We have computed the interaction PES for the LiH(X^{1}Σ^{+})–Ar(^{1}S) Van der Waals system using the rigid-rotor approximation and the Jacobi coordinate system in which *r*_{e} is the LiH internuclear distance, *R* the distance from the center of mass (c.m) of LiH to Ar atom, and θ the angle between the two distance vectors. The collinear LiH…Ar geometry corresponds to θ = 0° while the LiH bond length is frozen at the experimental equilibrium geometry of the ground state *r*_{e} = 3.0139 bohr (Huber & Herzberg 1979). Treating all geometries in the *CS* symmetry group, the PES has been computed with the CCSD(T) method (Knowles *et* al. 1993; 2000) as implemented in the MOLPRO2002 package (Werner *et* al. 2009). The H and Ar atoms have been described by the standard aug-cc-pVQZ basis set (Hutson & Green 1994; Smith *et* al. 1979; Lique *et* al. 2007). The Li atom has been described with cc-pVQZ basis set which we have added (1s1p1d1f1g) functions (Dunning 1989; Kendall et al. 1992; Woon and Dunning 1994, 1995). To this basis, we have added a set of (3s3p2d2f1g) bond functions defined by Cybulski and Toczylowski (1999) and placed at mid-distance between the center of mass of LiH and Ar atom. The basis set superposition error (BSSE) has been corrected at all geometries with the counterpoise procedure of Boys and Bernadi (1970). The PES obtained has a global minimum of 525.13 cm^{−1} located at *R* = 5.30 bohr and θ = 180°. The anisotropy of the PES is very large because of the character stems from the electronic structure of the LiH.

From *ab initio* grid containing 19 values of θ, we have been able to include terms up to λ_{
max
} = 18 The standard deviation between the analytical form and the calculated surface remains below 1.0%.

## Results and Discussion

### Rotational cross sections

^{−1}. The energy steps are 0.1 cm

^{−1}below 100 cm

^{−1}, 0.5 cm

^{−1}from 100 to 500 cm

^{−1}, 1 cm

^{−1}from 500 cm

^{−1}to 1000 cm

^{−1}, 10 cm

^{−1}from 1000 cm

^{−1}to 1500 cm

^{−1}and 500 cm

^{−1}from 1500 cm

^{−1}to 2500 cm

^{−1}. For the rotational basis sets, we have used

*J*

_{ max }= 10 for

*E*≤ 100 cm

^{−1},

*J*

_{ max }= 15 for 100 <

*E*≤ 1000 cm

^{−1}and

*J*

_{ max }= 30 for

*E*≥ 1000 cm

^{−1}. The scattering calculations have been performed to rotational basis sets of adequate size for a good accuracy of the results. The other parameters required as input in MOLSCAT and displayed in Table 1 have been fixed after the convergence tests. However, the maximum values of the total angular momentum JTOT was chosen according to a convergence criterion of the cross sections to within 0.01 Å for diagonal terms and 0.001 Å for off-diagonal ones. For example, we have JTOT = 97, 179, 229 and 317 for the collision energies of 100 cm

^{−1}, 500 cm

^{−1}, 1000 cm

^{−1}and 2500 cm

^{−1}respectively.

**MOLSCAT parameters used in the present calculations**

INTFLG = 6 | STEPS = 20, 10 | OTOL = 0.001 | DTOL = 0.01 |
---|---|---|---|

Be = 7.513100 cm | De = 0.00086170 cm | Jmax = 10, 15, 30 | Rmin = 3.0 bohr Rmax = 30 bohr |

*J*=

*J' – J = −*1,

*J*= 3 → 1,

*J*= 4 → 1 and

*J*= 5 → 1 rotational transitions. As one can see for collision energy below 200 cm

^{−1}, this figure illustrates some resonances. These resonances are the

*shape*resonances due to the quasi-bound states arising from the trap of Ar atom into the well depth (Smith

*et*al. 1979; Christoffel and Bowman 1983) and the

*Feshbach*resonances in the vicinity of the opening of a new j level derived to tunneling through the centrifugal energy barrier. These facts have been discussed by Vincent

*et*al. (2007).

The de-excitation cross sections decrease with increasing ∆*J* as a function of the kinetic energy. An analysis of this figure shows clearly that the magnitude of the transition 2 → 1 is larger than the others included the transition 1 → 0 in our previous work (Niane *et* al. 2012). The plots of de-excitation cross sections decrease with increasing ∆*J* and have almost the similar behavior. The Figure 1 illustrates the propensity in favor of the transitions ∆*J* = *J' – J = −* 1. This is consistent with similar results by Hammami *et* al. (2009). The features in our recent excitation cross sections (Niane *et* al. 2012) for the transitions 1 → *J* allow understanding the detailed balance equation that relate excitation and de-excitation cross sections.

### Downward rate coefficients

_{ J→J’ }(

*E*

_{ k }) over a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of kinetic energies

*E*

_{ k }following the procedure used in previous works (Hammami

*et*al. 2008a, 2008b, 2009; Nkem

*et*al. 2009).

where *T* is the kinetic temperature, *μ* = 6.68193048 a.u. is the reduced mass of the LiH-Ar collision partners, $\mathit{\beta}=\frac{1}{{\mathit{k}}_{\mathrm{B}}\mathit{T}}$ (*k*_{B} is the Boltzmann constant) and *E*_{
k
} = *E – E*_{
j
} is the relative kinetic energy. The Table 2 displays the results at selected temperatures.

**Downward rate coefficients (given as A(B) = A.10**
^{
B
}
**) of rotational levels of LiH in collisions with Ar as a function of kinetic temperature (in units of cm**
^{
3
}
**s**
^{
−1
}
**)**

Initial | Final | Rate coefficients | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

level J | level J’ | 10 K | 30 K | 50 K | 100 K | 150 K | 200 K | 300 K |

1 | 0 | 1.4523(−10) | 1.4645(−10) | 1.4592(−10) | 1.5986(−10) | 1.7872(−10) | 1.9545(−10) | 2.2034(−10) |

2 | 0 | 5.8075(−11) | 7.1884(−11) | 7.2722(−11) | 6.7117(−11) | 6.3849(−11) | 6.2450(−11) | 6.1586(−11) |

2 | 1 | 2.4694(−10) | 2.8061(−10) | 2.7242(−10) | 2.4286(−10) | 2.3069(−10) | 2.2910(−10) | 2.3796(−10) |

3 | 0 | 3.9204(−11) | 5.6170(−11) | 5.7489(−11) | 5.0864(−11) | 4.4844(−11) | 4.0685(−11) | 3.5799(−11) |

3 | 1 | 1.2052(−10) | 1.7421(−10) | 1.8270(−10) | 1.6721(−10) | 1.4951(−10) | 1.3632(−10) | 1.1974(−10) |

3 | 2 | 2.2353(−10) | 2.7512(−10) | 2.8660(−10) | 2.7651(−10) | 2.6171(−10) | 2.5181(−10) | 2.4369(−10) |

4 | 0 | 3.5679(−11) | 4.6672(−11) | 4.7499(−11) | 4.2990(−11) | 3.8446(−11) | 3.4945(−11) | 3.0214(−11) |

4 | 1 | 1.0461(−10) | 1.3556(−10) | 1.4080(−10) | 1.3174(−10) | 1.1999(−10) | 1.1031(−10) | 9.6563(−11) |

4 | 2 | 1.5181(−10) | 1.8957(−10) | 1.9925(−10) | 1.9695(−10) | 1.8754(−10) | 1.7818(−10) | 1.6299(−10) |

4 | 3 | 1.9458(−10) | 2.2991(−10) | 2.3826(−10) | 2.4094(−10) | 2.3928(−10) | 2.3746(−10) | 2.3571(−10) |

5 | 0 | 3.2612(−11) | 3.8686(−11) | 3.8332(−11) | 3.4966(−11) | 3.1964(−11) | 3.9586(−11) | 2.6135(−11) |

5 | 1 | 8.1900(−11) | 1.0025(−10) | 1.0301(−10) | 9.8940(−11) | 9.2976(−11) | 8.7593(−11) | 7.9068(−11) |

5 | 2 | 1.2049(−10) | 1.3733(−10) | 1.4167(−10) | 1.4138(−10) | 1.3770(−10) | 1.3348(−10) | 1.2550(−10) |

5 | 3 | 1.4602(−10) | 1.6247(−10) | 1.6695(−10) | 1.6875(−10) | 1.6826(−10) | 1. 6712(−10) | 1.6388(−10) |

5 | 4 | 1.5841(−10) | 1.8774(−10) | 1.9702(−10) | 2.0350(−10) | 2.0674(−10) | 2.0968(−10) | 2.1505(−10) |

6 | 0 | 2.3956(−11) | 2.7303(−11) | 2.7071(−11) | 2.5504(−11) | 2.4158(−11) | 2.3035(−11) | 2.1228(−11) |

6 | 1 | 5.6627(−11) | 6.6954(−11) | 6.8777(−11) | 6.8459(−11) | 6.6913(−11) | 6.5130(−11) | 6.1593(−11) |

6 | 2 | 7.8772(−11) | 9.0165(−11) | 9.3549(−11) | 9.6310(−11) | 9.6931(−11) | 9.6642(−11) | 9.4753(−11) |

6 | 3 | 9.9003(−11) | 1.1003(−10) | 1.1335(−10) | 1.1672(−10) | 1.1871(−10) | 1.2005(−10) | 1.2111(−10) |

6 | 4 | 1.1464(−10) | 1.3069(−10) | 1.3559(−10) | 1.4003(−10) | 1.4277(−10) | 1.4518(−10) | 1.4885(−10) |

6 | 5 | 1.4103(−10) | 1.6839(−10) | 1.7655(−10) | 1.8257(−10) | 1.8621(−10) | 1.9002(−10) | 1.9764(−10) |

7 | 0 | 1.5219(−11) | 1.6972(−11) | 1.7037(−11) | 1.6840(−11) | 1.6642(−11) | 1.6479(−11) | 1.6070(−11) |

7 | 1 | 3.6069(−11) | 4.1334(−11) | 4.2680(−11) | 4.4206(−11) | 4.5119(−11) | 4.5593(−11) | 4.5618(−11) |

7 | 2 | 4.8848(−11) | 5.5593(−11) | 5.8314(−11) | 6.2473(−11) | 6.5332(−11) | 6.7306(−11) | 6.9356(−11) |

7 | 3 | 6.2249(−11) | 6.9436(−11) | 7.2594(−11) | 7.7704(−11) | 8.1503(−11) | 8.4507(−11) | 8.8581(−11) |

7 | 4 | 7.5679(−11) | 8.5248(−11) | 8.9100(−11) | 9.4838(−11) | 9.9007(−11) | 1.0250(−10) | 1.0795(−10) |

7 | 5 | 9.5470(−11) | 1.0918(−10) | 1.1370(−10) | 1.1934(−10) | 1.2351(−10) | 1.2726(−10) | 1.3370(−10) |

7 | 6 | 1.3671(−10) | 1.6099(−10) | 1.6733(−10) | 1.7162(−10) | 1.7462(−10) | 1/7817(−10) | 1.8590(−10) |

8 | 0 | 8.8089(−12) | 9.7013(−12) | 9.9159(−12) | 1.0294(−11) | 1.0690(−11) | 1.1032(−11) | 1.1471(−11) |

8 | 1 | 2.1408(−11) | 2.4022(−11) | 2.5081(−11) | 2.7118(−11) | 2.8920(−11) | 3.0395(−11) | 3.2349(−11) |

8 | 2 | 2.9185(−11) | 3.2861(−11) | 3.4919(−11) | 3.9058(−11) | 4.2518(−11) | 4.5355(−11) | 4.9356(−11) |

8 | 3 | 3.7481(−11) | 4.1756(−11) | 4.4470(−11) | 4.9984(−11) | 5.4442(−11) | 5.8151(−11) | 6.3736(−11) |

8 | 4 | 4.6666(−11) | 5.2136(−11) | 5.5420(−11) | 6.1976(−11) | 6.7113(−11) | 7.1358(−11) | 7.8001(−11) |

8 | 5 | 5.9281(−11) | 6.6721(−11) | 7.0434(−11) | 7.7459(−11) | 8.3015(−11) | 8.7657(−11) | 9.5109(−11) |

8 | 6 | 8.2936(−11) | 9.3863(−11) | 9.7797(−11) | 1.0386(−10) | 1.0884(−10) | 1.1334(−10) | 1.2110(−10) |

8 | 7 | 1.3408(−10) | 1.5491(−10) | 1.6003(−10) | 1.6371(−10) | 1.6652(−10) | 1.6996(−10) | 1.7762(−10) |

9 | 0 | 4.7020(−12) | 5.2283(−12) | 5.4786(−12) | 6.0201(−12) | 6.5558(−12) | 7.0524(−12) | 7.8370(−12) |

9 | 1 | 1.1801(−11) | 1.3287(−11) | 1.4146(−11) | 1.6069(−11) | 1.7895(−11) | 1.9553(−11) | 2.2164(−11) |

9 | 2 | 1.6467(−11) | 1.8651(−11) | 2.0197(−11) | 2.3731(−11) | 2.6917(−11) | 2.9747(−11) | 3.4258(−11) |

9 | 3 | 2.1330(−11) | 2.4051(−11) | 2.6216(−11) | 3.1200(−11) | 3.5466(−11) | 3.9152(−11) | 4.5064(−11) |

9 | 4 | 2.6912(−11) | 3.0344(−11) | 3.3040(−11) | 3.9293(−11) | 4.4497(−11) | 4.8862(−11) | 5.5809(−11) |

9 | 5 | 3.4467(−11) | 3.8889(−11) | 4.1962(−11) | 4.9054(−11) | 5.5023(−11) | 6.0004(−11) | 6.7897(−11) |

9 | 6 | 4.6934(−11) | 5.2930(−11) | 5.6296(−11) | 6.3612(−11) | 6.9894(−11) | 7.5266(−11) | 8.3952(−11) |

9 | 7 | 7.1389(−11) | 8.0616(−11) | 8.4337(−11) | 9.1006(−11) | 9.6683(−11) | 1.0180(−10) | 1.1054(−10) |

9 | 8 | 1.2869(−10) | 1.4711(−10) | 1.5162(−10) | 1.5584(−10) | 1.5917(−10) | 1.6291(−10) | 1.7084(−10) |

10 | 0 | 2.4197(−12) | 2.7180(−12) | 2.9313(−12) | 3.4324(−12) | 3.9173(−12) | 4.3837(−12) | 5.1889(−12) |

10 | 1 | 6.2689(−12) | 7.1015(−12) | 7.7515(−12) | 9.3244(−12) | 1.0841(−11) | 1.2286(−11) | 1.4776(−11) |

10 | 2 | 8.9852(−12) | 1.0238(−11) | 1.1346(−11) | 1.4105(−11) | 1.6691(−11) | 1.9095(−11) | 2.3229(−11) |

10 | 3 | 1.1774(−11) | 1.3402(−11) | 1.4980(−11) | 1.8997(−11) | 2.2613(−11) | 2.5840(−11) | 3.1273(−11) |

10 | 4 | 1.4982(−11) | 1.7035(−11) | 1.9048(−11) | 2.4279(−11) | 2.8911(−11) | 3.2908(−11) | 3.9456(−11) |

10 | 5 | 1.9199(−11) | 2.1785(−11) | 2.4145(−11) | 3.0330(−11) | 3 ?5872(−11) | 4.0614(−11) | 4.8262(−11) |

10 | 6 | 2.5855(−11) | 2.9221(−11) | 3.1888(−11) | 3.8707(−11) | 4.4906(−11) | 5.0278(−11) | 5.8978(−11) |

10 | 7 | 3.7560(−11) | 4.2255(−11) | 4.5290(−11) | 5.2547(−11) | 5.0100(−11) | 6.4872(−11) | 7.4413(−11) |

10 | 8 | 6.1122(−11) | 6.8648(−11) | 7.2240(−11) | 7.9634(−11) | 8.6010(−11) | 9.1702(−11) | 1.0130(−10) |

10 | 9 | 1.2147(−10) | 1.3727(−10) | 1.4152(−10) | 1.4706(−10) | 1.5149(−10) | 1.5590(−10) | 1.6445(−10) |

We notice that the downward rate coefficients depend on low temperature. This effect of temperature dependence has been seen by Taylor and Hinde (2005) at little temperature, they explain that the lack of dependence is indicated of downward mechanism in which attractive collisions dominate the energy transfer process for ion-molecule processes. The LiH-Ar system is very attracted when the Ar atom is near the lithium end of LiH. The Figure 2 shows the propensity toward ∆*J* = − 1 transitions. This result confirms the same propensity observed with the cross sections and remains an important consequence of atmospherical chemistry.

*J*for selected ∆

*J*= −1, −2 and

*J*→ 1 transitions respectively. Except the ∆

*J*= −1 transition at 10 K, the plots of rate coefficients exhibit the same trends and decrease with increasing

*J*’ from

*J*' = 2. For

*J*→ 1, the downward rate coefficients decrease with increasing

*J*and the gap between the plots narrow considerably. In addition, the collision rate coefficients reflect the similar behavior with the general trends observed earlier for HCP-He (Hammami

*et*al. 2008b) and HCP-H

_{2}(Hammami

*et*al. 2008c) systems.

## Conclusion

In this work, using the *ab initio* PES LiH(X^{1}Σ^{+})–Ar(^{1}S) van der Waals system computed in our previous work (Niane *et* al. 2012), we have obtained results of a quantum mechanical close coupling calculation of integral cross sections for lower rotational levels. By averaging the cross sections over a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of kinetic energies, we have inferred the downward rate coefficient for the lowest 11 levels.

The downward rate coefficients at 300 K for the transitions 1 → 0, 2 → 1 and 3 → 2 are estimated respectively at 2.5664 10^{−10}, 2.7792 10^{−10} and 2.5272 10^{−10} cm^{3}s^{−1}. It is obvious that these results may be useful for the atmospherical chemistry as well as for experiments. Finally, encouraged by this result, we will be undertaking the study of the spectroscopy of complex and the vibrational dependence of potential energy surface which is crucial for the diatomic molecular.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Office of External Activities (ICTP-OEA) under NET45 program. We thanks Drs F. Lique (*Université du Havre, 25 Rue Philippe Lebon, BP 540, 76 058 Le Havre cedex*) and N. Feautrier (*Observatoire de Paris-Meudon*), for their interest in this work and for fruitful discussions. We are also grateful to the *Centre de Calcul de l’Université Cheikh Anta Diop* of Dakar.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Aguillon F, Belyaev AK, Sidis V, Sizum M: Time-dependant study of collinear H
^{−}+ H_{2}( v) collisions.*Phys Chem Chem Phys*2000, 2: 3577-3582. 10.1039/b003275lView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Arthurs AM, Dalgarno A: The theory of scattering by a rigid rotator.
*Proc R Soc Lond A*1960, 256: 540-551. 10.1098/rspa.1960.0125View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Berriche H: Rotationally inelastic collisions of LiH (X
^{1}S^{+}) with H: State-to-state inelastic rotational cross-section.*J Mol Struct*2004, 682: 89-96. 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.05.034View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Berriche H, Tlili C: Ab initio potential energy surface and rotationally inelastic collisions of LiH (X
^{1}S^{+}) with H. I. The ab initio evaluation of the potential energy surface.*J Mol Struct*2004, 678: 11-16. 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.01.051View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Bodo E, Kumar S, Gianturco FA: Vibrational heating efficiency of LiH molecules in collision with He atoms.
*J Phys Chem A*1998, 102: 9390-9398. 10.1021/jp981462qView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Boys SF, Bernardi F: Calculation of small molecular interactions by differences of separate total energies - some procedures with reduced errors.
*Mol Phys*1970, 19: 533-566. 10.1080/00268977000101541View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Christoffel KM, Bowman JM: Quantum and classical dynamics of a coupled double well oscillator.
*J Chem Phys*1983, 103: 3952.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cybulski SM, Toczylowski RR: Ground state potential energy curves for He2, Ne2, Ar2, He-Ne, He-Ar, and Ne-Ar: A coupled-clurster study.
*Chem Phys*1999, 111: 10520. 10.1063/1.480430Google Scholar - Dagdigian PJ:
*The Chemical Dynamics and Kinetics of Small Free Radicals, Part I*. Edited by: Liu K, Wagner A. Singapore: World Science; 1995:315.Google Scholar - Dagdigian PJ: State-resolved collision-induced electronic transitions.
*Annu Rev Phys Chem*1997, 48: 95. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.95View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dalgarno A, Kirby K, Stancil PC:
*Astrophys J*. 1996, 458: 397.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Dunning TH Jr: Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen.
*J Chem Phys*1989, 90: 1007. 10.1063/1.456153View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Eyles CJ, Brouard M, Yang C-H, Klos J, Aoiz FJ, Gijsbertsen A, Wiskerke AE, Stolte S: Interference structures in the differencial cross sections for inelastic scattering of NO by Ar.
*Nat Chem*2011, 3: 597. 10.1038/nchem.1071View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Feng E, Huang W, Cui Z, Zhang W: State-to-state cross-sections for rotationally inelastic collision of LiH with Ne.
*Chem Phys*2004, 303: 309-316. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.06.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Feng E, Huang W, Cui Z, Zhang W: Predicted rovibrational structure of Ne–LiH complex based on an ab initio potential, J. Mol. Struct.
*Theochem*2005, 724: 195-202. 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.03.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Forni A: Rotationally inelastic collisions of LiH with He: a quasi-classical dynamics study.
*J Mol (Theochem)*1999, 468: 73. 10.1016/S0166-1280(98)00507-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gianturco FA, Kumar S, Pathak SK, Raimondi M, Sironi M, Gerratt J, Cooper DL: Interaction forces energy transfer dynamics of LiH(X
^{1}Σ^{+}) and helium atoms – I. The ab initio evaluation of the lowest potential energy surface.*Chem Phys*1997, 215: 227-238. 10.1016/S0301-0104(96)00264-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gianturco FA, Kumar S, Pathak SK, Raimondi M, Sironi M: Interaction forces energy transfer dynamics of LiH(X
^{1}Σ^{+}) and helium atoms – I. Rotationally inelastic collisions and excitation efficiency.*Chem Phys*1997, 215: 239-252. 10.1016/S0301-0104(96)00317-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gianturco FA, Paesani F, Curik R, Delgado-Barrio G, Gozalez-Lezana T, Miret-Artes S, Villareal P: Can the LiH molecule bind He atoms? A computational experiment.
*Chem Phys Lett*1999, 311: 255. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00818-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gonzalez-Sanchez I, Bodo E, Yurtsever E, Gianturco FA: Quenching efficiency of “hot” polar molecules by He buffer gas at ultralow energies: quantum results for MgH and LiH rotations.
*Eur Phys J D*2008, 48: 75-82. 10.1140/epjd/e2008-00072-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hammami K, Owono Owono LC, Jaidane N, Ben Lakhdar Z: Rotational excitation of methyldynium (CH
^{+}) by helium atom at low temperature.*J Mol Struct Theochem*2008, 853: 18-26. 10.1016/j.theochem.2007.11.038View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hammami K, Owono Owono LC, Jaidane N, Ben Lakhdar Z: State to state rotational integral cross sections and rate coefficients of HCP collision with He at low temperature.
*J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM)*2008, 860: 45-51. 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.03.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hammami K, Owono Owono LC, Jaidane N, Ben Lakhdar Z: Rotational inelastic collisions of methinoposphide (HCP) with para-H
_{2}at low temperature.*J Phys Chem*2008, 129: 204305. 10.1063/1.3009268View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hammami K, Owono Owono LC, Stäuber P: Rotational excitation of methylidynium (CH
^{+}) by a helium atom at high temperature.*Astron Astrophys*2009, 507: 1083-1086. 10.1051/0004-6361/200912663View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Huber KP, Herzberg G:
*Molecular Spectra and Molecular Constants of Diatomic Molecules*. 4th edition. New York: Van Nostrand; 1979.Google Scholar - Hutson JM, Green S:
*MOLSCAT Computer Code, Version 14*. United Kingdom: Collaborative Computational Project N 6 of the Science and Engineering Research Council; 1994.Google Scholar - Kendall RA, Dunning TH Jr, Harrison RJ: Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions.
*J Chem Phys*1992, 96: 6796. 10.1063/1.462569View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Knowles PJ, Hampel C, Werner HJ: Coupled-cluster theory for highspin open-shell reference wave functions.
*J Chem Phys*1993, 99: 5219. 10.1063/1.465990View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Knowles PJ, Hampel C, Werner HJ: Note that the implementation in all versions of MOLPRO prior to 2000.1 is afflicted by the bug detailed in said erratum: as a result, the RCCSD(T)/UCCSD(T) difference reported should be reduced by 0.2 kcal/mol.
*J Chem Phys*2000, 112: 3106. 10.1063/1.480886View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lique F, Senent ML, Spielfiedel A, Feautrier N: Rotationally inelastic collisions of SO (X
^{3}Σ^{−}) with H_{2}: potential energy surface and first results with para-H_{2}.*J Chem Phys*2007, 126: 164312. 10.1063/1.2723733View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lu Y, Xie D, Yang M, Yan G: An ab initio potential energy surface of Ne–LiH.
*Chem Phys Lett*2000, 327: 305-313. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00892-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Manolopoulos DE: An improved log derivative method for inelastic scattering.
*J Chem Phys*1986, 85: 6425. 10.1063/1.451472View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Niane A, Hammami K, Faye NAB, Jaidane N: Ab initio potential energy surface and rotationally inelastic collisions of hydride of lithium (LiH) with argon (Ar): State-to-state inelastic rotational cross section.
*Comput Theor Chem*2012, 993: 20-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Nkem C, Hammami K, Manga A, Owono Owono LC, Jaidane N, Ben Lakhdar Z: Collision-induced rotational excitation of SiH+ by He atom at low temperatures.
*Mol Struc (THEOCHEM)*2009, 901: 220-225. 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.01.037View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Paterson G, Relf A, Costen ML, McKendrick KG, Alexander MH, Dagdigian PJ: Rotationally elastic and inelastic dynamics of NO(X
^{2}Π, ν = 0) in collisions with Ar.*J Chem Phys*2011, 135: 234304. 10.1063/1.3665135View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ren R, Ortiz AL, Markmaitree T, Osborn W, Shaw LL: Stability of lithium hydride in Argon and air.
*J Phys Chem B*2006, 110: 10567-10575. 10.1021/jp060068mView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Santiago RD, Alvarez-BAjo O, Lemus R, Arias JM, Gomez-Camacho J, Rodriguez-Gallardo M: Algebraic description of the inelastic collision between an atom and a Morse oscillator in one dimension.
*J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys*2008, 41: 145203. 10.1088/0953-4075/41/14/145203View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Smith LN, Malick DJ, Secrest D: Rotational compound state resonances for an argon and methane scattering system.
*J Chem Phys*1979, 71: 4502. 10.1063/1.438203View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Taylor BK, Hinde RJ: The He–LiH potential energy surface revisited. II. Rovibrational energy transfer on a three-dimensional surface.
*J Chem Phys*2005, 122: 074308. 10.1063/1.1851495View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vincent LFM, Spielfield A, Lique F: Rotational excitation of SiS molecules by collisions with He atoms.
*Astron Astrophys*2007, 472: 1037-1040. 10.1051/0004-6361:20077869View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Werner HJ, Knowles PJ, Almöf J: MOLPRO, Ab Initio Programs. 2009.http://www.molpro.net SeeGoogle Scholar
- Woon DE, Dunning TH Jr: Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. IV. Calculation of static electrical response properties.
*J Chem Phys*1994, 100: 2975-2988. 10.1063/1.466439View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Woon DE, Dunning TH Jr: Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core-valence sets for boron through neon.
*J Chem Phys*1995, 103: 4572-4585. 10.1063/1.470645View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.