Open Access

Coconut shells as filling material for anaerobic filters

  • Luana Mattos de Oliveira Cruz1,
  • Ronaldo Stefanutti2,
  • Bruno Coraucci Filho1 and
  • Adriano Luiz Tonetti3Email author
SpringerPlus20132:655

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-655

Received: 8 August 2013

Accepted: 29 November 2013

Published: 5 December 2013

Abstract

In rural areas of developing countries, there is a lack of sanitation services and the installation of such infrastructure is hampered by the high investment costs for initial implementation and by the limited availability of qualified personnel. An alternative to traditional sanitation services include an anaerobic filter, but the high cost of appropriate filling material can be an obstacle to its wide-spread implementation. To decrease this construction cost, the objective of this work was to study the use of coconut shells as filling material for anaerobic filters. Anaerobic filters were built and filled with the studied material and operated with up flow and hydraulic retention time of 9 hours. The reactors provided a removal of 79 ± 16% in BOD terms, indicating that the coconut shell filling had efficiency consistent with the literature data. In addition, the husks were found to retain their tensile strength following use in the reactors. Coconut husks have more empty bed volume than other low cost materials, such as crushed stone, nearing properties of traditional materials. The results of this study indicate that coconut husks may prove to be a low cost alternative to traditional fillers for anaerobic treatment in rural communities.

Keywords

Anaerobic filter Anaerobic treatment Coconut Decentralized sanitation On site sewage treatment Sewage

Introduction

It is estimated that over 82% of the rural population in developing countries have poor sanitation services (Alexiou and Mara 2003;Massoud et al. 2009). In Brazil alone, 31 million people live outside major urban centers (IBGE 2010) and a large portion of their waste is discarded in local bodies of water or surface soil, threatening the quality of water used for public supply. In conjunction with this lack of centralized sanitation, residents of rural areas have little capacity to invest in infrastructure and a lack of technical understanding to drive implementation (Paraskevas et al. 2002;Tonetti et al. 2012), hindering the installation of sophisticated and costly systems to treat sewage.

The Brazilian Research Programme on Basic Sanitation (PROSAB) has completed numerous research studies investigating methods to improve sanitation in rural areas. One of the reactors studied was the anaerobic filter, which is a relatively low cost option with a compact design which produces a small amount of excess sludge (Camargo and Nour 2001;Baek et al. 2010;Frankin 2001), making it suitable for decentralized sanitation in rural communities (Hedberg 1999;Wilderer and Schreff 2000).

One of the greatest impediments to the adoption of such treatment on a wide-spread scale is the cost of the filling material (Frankin 2001), which alone can be as costly as the reactor construction (Van Haandel et al. 2006). Therefore, alternative materials have been studied to replace traditional materials such as crushed stone and plastic rings. Low cost materials being evaluated include cut conduit rings, ground granulated blast furnace slag, bamboo rings and ceramic bricks (Camargo and Nour 2001;Tonetti et al. 2011;Chernicharo 2006), glass (Show and Tay 1999), loofah sponge (Yang et al. 2004), porous floating ceramic media (Kang et al. 2003) and ground tire rubber (Barros et al. 2011).

Seeking to increase the possibility of using anaerobic filters in small villages, it was found that coconut shells of the Cocos nucifera species could be used as a filler medium. Such coconuts are widely available in many countries, especially in developing countries, such as India, Philippines, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Mexico and Brazil (EMBRAPA 2011). Brazil produces more than 1 billion coconut fruits per year (EMBRAPA 2011) and, as a consequence, there is an enormous amount of waste husks, boosting several research studies investigating the utilization of these shells in new products or processes.

In Brazil, despite the spread of UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanker) reactor (Rosa et al. 2012), in small communities use of anaerobic filters would still be more attractive. The anaerobic filters are more easily constructed, requiring only a tank and filling material. The filling material makes it difficult to washout the sludge and particulate organic matter, ensuring a better quality effluent even with the existence of large fluctuations in flow, characteristic of small treatment systems. The filling material also assists in the proper sewage flow distribution, hampering the formation of short circuits. In comparison, the UASB reactor requires the gas-liquid separator, which requires greater care in its design and construction. Additionally, in such a system, if the sewage distribution system is not built and maintained correctly, there will be the risk of forming preferential flow channels, impairing treatment.

For these reasons, the present study focuses on the use of coconut shells of the Cocos nucifera species as a medium for anaerobic filters, evaluating their resistance to biological and chemical degradation due from sewage interaction. Additionally, this study assesses ability of coconut husks to generate effluent that meets legal standards. This makes it possible to evaluate the applicability of an urban waste, the husks, as filling material for anaerobic filters, reducing the cost of construction of the reactor and allowing the recycling of coconut shells.

Materials and methods

This project was carried out in a research area of the School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urbanism, University of Campinas (UNICAMP). The raw sewage was collected from the sewage collection network within the university campus, with a portion of its flow directed to four anaerobic filters. The reactors were made of stainless steel with cylindrical shape and total volume of 500 L (Figure 1). The filters were 1.68 m in length and 0.76 m in diameter. The conical bottom was separated from the region occupied by pieces of coconut shells by a bamboo grid (Cruz et al. 2010 and Tonetti et al. 2012). The grid was also used to better distribute the sewage.
Figure 1

Scheme of the up flow anaerobic filter (Tonetti et al. 2012 ).

The material used to fill the anaerobic filters was coconut shells of the Cocos nucifera species, broken into four pieces as shown in Figure 2. Approximately 280 kg of this material was needed to fill each reactor.
Figure 2

Coconut shells of the Cocos nucifera species.

The operation of the anaerobic filters was with up flow and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 9 hours. This HRT duration was chosen based on previous experiments conducted by Cruz et al. (2010). Cruz et al. (2010) studied this reactor after the starting period and, in this article, we seek to provide a greater amount of data.

Samples of raw sewage and effluent from the four anaerobic filters were obtained weekly, and analyses of pH, total alkalinity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids, volatile suspended solids, phosphate and Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) were performed according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2012).

The data presented in this paper was obtained over a two year period. The reactors start–up occurred without inoculation and lasted for three months, until the reactor reached a steady state of various physico-chemical parameters such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD).

Tensile test

Tensile testing of the coconut shells was done using mechanical equipment from MTS (810-TestStarII Model). For each tensile test ten fibers removed from coconut husks were used. The fibers were twisted for the measurement of its diameter with a caliper and were subjected to a load of increasing force until failure. From the data obtained and the sectional area, we found the tensile strength by using Equation 1. The coconut husks samples were extracted portions of shells prior to and after being used as filler material in the reactor.
Τ = F A
(1)

Where T is the value of tensile strength (MPa), F is the maximum force applied (N) up to its rupture and A is the estimated area (mm2) from the diameter measured. The speed at which the claws distanced was 0.020 m.min-1.

Density, empty bed volume and surface area

The density of the coconut shells was determined using the principle of mass and water displacement. A 10 L vessel was utilized in which 5 L of water was loaded and the mass and temperature of this set-up was determined. Following this, coconut shells were loaded into the vessel until the maximum volume of the vessel was reached, and the new mass was recorded. From the obtained data of weight and volume displacement of the liquid in the vessel, the density (kg.m-3) was determined.

To find the empty bed volume, the same methodology used to obtain the shell density was utilized. The displacement volume of the liquid caused by the introduction of coconut shells on the vessel was used and this was related to the original volume of liquid, according to the Brazilian guidelines (NBR NM45 2006).

To determine the surface area of the material, husk surfaces were coated with paint and the surface was super-positioned on black paper. The picture that appeared on the dark surface was scanned and the area was determined using Autocad. This data is then correlated with the volume area, obtaining the surface area in m2.m-3.

Results and discussion

Throughout the research testing period, the average temperature was 25.4 ± 4.5oC and the pH values were 7.2 ± 0.3 for the raw sewage sample and 7.2 ± 0.5 for the effluent of the anaerobic filters. Total alkalinity averaged 156 ± 35 mgCaCO3L-1 and 301 ± 100 mgCaCO3L-1, respectively for raw sewage and anaerobic effluent. The increased alkalinity observed for the anaerobic effluent indicated that the coconut shells do not impair the buffering capacity of the system.

As for chemical oxygen demand (COD), the mean found for the raw sewage was 1105 ± 338 mgO2L-1 (Figure 3). This figure is above the range considered as typical by Metcalf and Eddy (2003). This is attributed to the sewage collection area utilized, which is believed to receive an abnormally high concentration of organic matter as it was inserted on a University campus.
Figure 3

Average COD of the raw sewage and effluent from anaerobic filters.

After the anaerobic treatment, the effluent reached a COD of 281 ± 118 mgO2L-1, indicating a removal of 73 ± 12% of the organic matter in COD terms. This removal is similar to averages from 65 to 80% for other anaerobic reactors (Foresti 2002) and is consistent with the efficiency found by other authors such as Cruz et al. (2010) and Camargo and Nour (2001), who used bamboo as a medium for anaerobic filters and who obtained removals in the range from 60 to 80%.

Despite the high percentage of removal of organic matter, the effluent still possessed COD values above the maximum allowable limit for release into bodies of water appointed by the laws of the Brazilian State of Minas Gerais (COPAM 2008), which is 180 mgO2L-1. This is one of the few Brazilian standards that indicate the maximum COD value acceptable to discharge into the environment. From this information, it appears that anaerobic filters, irrespective of the material employed as filling, require a post-treatment to achieve COD levels below the specified maximum value.

The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) for raw sewage averaged 419 ± 79 mgL-1 (Figure 4). The anaerobic effluent reached 79 ± 54 mgL-1, providing an efficiency of 79 ± 16% over the raw sewage. This removal obtained can also be compared to the survey conducted in Brazil by Cruz et al. (2010) and Pinto (1995). The researchers found that, for a series of surveys which used anaerobic filters operated with hydraulic retention times ranging between 6 and 8 hours, average efficiencies ranged between 68 and 79%. Thus, it is clear that the reactors studied in this work achieved results comparable to the previous studies.
Figure 4

Average BOD of the raw sewage and effluent from anaerobic filters.

The removal of nitrogen and phosphorus was negligible, which is expected when comparing similar previous studies (Mergaert et al. 1992). The raw sewage had a Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) concentration of 58 ± 13 mgL-1 and the anaerobic effluent had a concentration of 52 ± 9 mgL-1, with no significant difference between the values. For phosphorus, the concentrations of both collection points were equal to 2.0 ± 0.7 mgL-1.

Tensile test, density, empty bed volume and surface area

In Table 1 are the results from tension testing of the coconut husk fibers. Results indicate that the amount of force and maximum tension withheld by the fibers after use in the anaerobic filter is statistically the same as those fibers tested prior to use in the filters. This indicates that the use of coconut husks as filler material within anaerobic filters did not alter the strength of the husks over the two years of study.
Table 1

Mean values of the tensile test

Parameter

Before using in anaerobic filter

After using in anaerobic filter

Diameter range of ten fibers taken from coconut husks (mm)

8.2 ± 1.8 a

8.0 ± 1.1 a

Area (mm2)

54.2 ± 26.1 a

52.0 ± 15.1 a

Force (N)

96.7 ± 5.1 a

95.7 ± 3.0 a

Tension (MPa)

2.1 ± 0.7 a

2.0 ± 0.5 a

Different lower case letters in each line indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

Table 2 presents the results for density, empty bed volume and surface area determined for the coconut shells. These values are compared to reported values for other commonly used materials.
Table 2

Density, empty bed volume and surface area

Parameter

Coconut shells

Bamboo rings

Crushed stone

Rasching rings (2 in)*

 

Before using in anaerobic filters

After using in anaerobic filters

   

Density (kg.m-3)

915.9 ± 46.4 a

306.3 ± 66.8 b

n.a.**

n.a.**

n.a.**

Empty bed volume (%)

62.5 ± 2.4 a

81.3 ± 2.7 b

75

55

92

Specific surface area (m2.m-3)

89.6 ± 13.5 a

100.3 ± 14.8 b

91.8

60.1

103.0

*Henley and Seader (2005). **n.a.: not found in the literature. Different lower case letters in each line indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).

We can note that, after the period of residence inside the reactor, there was a significant increase in the empty bed volume, with a change from 62.5 ± 2.4 to 81.3 ± 2.7%. This may be due to the consumption of easily degradable compounds present in the coconut shell. The portion of the husk consisting of fibers has a degradation hampered by the existence of cellulose and woody material, which confers high stability to the biological action (Ohmiya et al. 2005). The properties detailed in Tables 1 and 2 were also assessed every four months (data not shown). At four months of operation, there was no significant difference in the properties evaluated (Table 2), indicating that the coconut husks retain their integrity as a filler medium for long periods of use.

Similar to the increase in empty bed volume over the full operation time, there was an increase in surface area, from 89.6 ± 5.13 to 100.3 ± 14.8 m2.m-3. This provides the appropriate conditions for the adhesion of a large amount of biomass (Chernicharo 2007). The decrease in density, from 915.9 ± 46.4 to 306.3 ± 66.8 kg.m-3, means that it is not necessary to construct a reactor with heavy and expensive structures to withstand increased weight over time.

Regarding the empty bed volume and surface area, it is important to note that, after the residence inside the reactor, results showed values higher than those found in the literature for crushed stone and bamboo rings and similar to the characteristics found for the Rasching rings, filling commonly used in the chemical industry. This can be important in reducing the possibility of clogging of the bed due to the obstruction of the interstices, as explained by Chernicharo (2007).

During the full two years of experimentation, there was never any observable clogging of the system, demonstrating that the use of coconut shell does not create major obstacles to the flow of sewage into the reactor. As the coconut husk has a diameter of about 0.150 m, each of the four parts used in filling the reactor has an average width of 0.018 m and is not so small to cause clogging of the reactor.

Additionally, there was never a need to performed sludge removal, demonstrating that this system requires a low frequency of maintenance. Still, the concentration of suspended solids in the effluent from the reactor remained consistently low, with an average 33 ± 14 mgL-1. Dividing the study period into six groups of four months shows that the averages for TSS concentrations were not significantly different (20, 40, 35, 30, 28 and 30 mgL-1), indicating the filters did not develop strong drag sludge particles even in the final stage of the study. All concentrations were below the maximum allowable limit for release into bodies of water appointed by the laws of the Brazilian State of Minas Gerais (COPAM 2008), which is 100 mgO2L-1. Minas Gerais is one of the few states of the Brazilian federation that has specified this parameter in their environmental legislation.

Conclusions

With the results obtained, it was found that it is possible to employ coconut shells as filler material in anaerobic filters, as they have high resistance to biological degradation. In addition to this, the coconut husks displayed more robust values of empty bed volume and surface area than other low cost materials typically employed.

The anaerobic filter with coconut shells as filling led to a treatment efficiency for COD and BOD compatible with those found in the literature. Finally, the system is simple in terms of operation and maintenance. Therefore, this research has shown that for the construction of anaerobic filters in small communities, especially in developing countries.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CNPq for the scholarships granted, and FAPESP and FINEP for financing the research. The authors also acknowledge the assistance of Nicole Ostrowski from University of Pittsburgh, for the linguistic revision of the paper.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Architecture and Urbanism, FEC/UNICAMP, University of Campinas-School of Civil Engineering
(2)
Center for Technology, Federal University of Ceará, UFC
(3)
Architecture and Urbanism, FEC/UNICAMP, University of Campinas-School of Civil Engineering

References

  1. Alexiou GE, Mara DD: Anaerobic waste stabilization ponds. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003, 109: 241-252. 10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:241View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Baek SH, Pagilla KR, Kim H: Lab-scale study of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for dilute municipal wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2010, 15: 704-708. 10.1007/s12257-009-0194-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Barros AR, Adorno MAT, Sakamoto IK, Maintinguer SI, Varesche MBA, Silva ES: Performance evaluation and phylogenetic characterization of anaerobic fluidized bed reactors using ground tire and pet as support materials for biohydrogen production. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102: 3840-3847. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Camargo SAR, Nour EAA: Bamboo as an anaerobic medium: effect of filter column height. Water Sci Technol 2001, 44: 63-70.Google Scholar
  5. Chernicharo CAL: Post-treatment options for the anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2006, 5: 73-92. 10.1007/s11157-005-5683-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chernicharo C: Reatores Anaeróbios. 1st edition. Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 2007:379.Google Scholar
  7. COPAM-Conselho Estadual De Política Ambiental: Deliberação Normativa n° 1. Minas Gerais: Diário do Executivo de Minas Gerais; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Cruz LMO, Tonetti AL, Coraucci Filho B, Tonon D, Stefanutti R: Remoção da matéria orgânica de efluente doméstico por reator anaeróbio preenchido com coco verde. Revista DAE 2010, 184: 11-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. EMBRAPA Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária: Evolução da produção de coco no Brasil e o comércio internacional. Aracaju: Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiro; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. Foresti E: Anaerobic treatment of domestic sewage: established technologies and perspectives. Water Sci Technol 2002, 45(10):181-186.Google Scholar
  11. Frankin RJ: Full-scale experiences with anaerobic treatment of industrial wastewater. Water Sci Technol 2001, 44: 1-6.Google Scholar
  12. Hedberg T: Attitudes to traditional and alternative sustainable sanitary systems. Water Sci Technol 1999, 39: 9-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Henley EJ, Seader JD: Separation Process Principles. 2nd edition. New York (USA): John Wiley&Sons, Inc; 2005:700.Google Scholar
  14. IBGE-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Pesquisa Nacional de Saneamento Básico. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério do Planejamento e Orçamento; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. Kang H, Moon S, Shin K, Park S: Pretreatment of swine wastewater using anaerobic filter. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003, 109: 117-126. 10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Massoud MA, Tarhini BA, Nasr JA: Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 2009, 90: 652-659. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mergaert K, Vanderhaegen B, Verstraete W: Applicability and trends of anaerobic pre-treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Res 1992, 26(8):1025-1033. 10.1016/0043-1354(92)90137-SView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Metcalf L, Eddy HP: Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. 4th edition. New York (USA): Metcalf & Eddy, Inc; 2003:1848.Google Scholar
  19. NBR NM45: Agregados–Determinação da massa unitária e do volume de vazios. São Paulo: ABNT; 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Ohmiya K, Sakka K, Kimura T: Anaerobic bacterial degradation for the effective utilization of biomass. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2005, 10: 482-493. 10.1007/BF02932282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Paraskevas PA, Giokas DL, Lekkas TD: Wastewater management in coastal urban areas: the case of Greece. Water Sci Technol 2002, 46: 177-186.Google Scholar
  22. Pinto JDS: Tratamento de esgotos sanitários em filtros anaeróbios utilizando escória de alto forno como meio suporte. Brazil: Dissertation in Sanitary Engineering. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 1995.Google Scholar
  23. Rosa AP, Lobato LCS, Chernicharo CAL, Martins DCRB, Maciel FM, Borges JM: Improving performance and operational control of UASB reactors via proper sludge and scum discharge routines. Water Pract Tech 2012, 7(3):1-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Show KY, Tay JH: Influence of support media on biomass growth and retention in anaerobic filters. Water Res 1999, 33(6):1471-1481. 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00352-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 22nd edition. Washington DC, USA: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation; 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Tonetti AL, Coraucci Filho B, Guimarães JR, Cruz MOC, Nakamura MS: Avaliação da partida e operação de filtros anaeróbios tendo bambu como material de recheio. Revista Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental 2011, 16(1):11-16. 10.1590/S1413-41522011000100004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tonetti AL, Coraucci Filho B, Nicolau CE, Barbosa M, Tonon D: Tratamento de esgoto e produção de água de reúso com o emprego de filtros de areia. Revista Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental 2012, 17(1):287-294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Haandel A, Kato MT, Cavalcanti PFF, Florencio L: Anaerobic reactor design concepts for thetreatment of domestic wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2006, 5: 21-38. 10.1007/s11157-005-4888-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilderer PA, Schreff D: Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers. Water Sci Technol 2000, 41(1):1-8.Google Scholar
  30. Yang Y, Tada C, Miah MS, Tsukahara K, Yagishita T, Sawayama S: Influence of bed materials on methanogenic characteristics and immobilized microbes in anaerobic digester. Mater Sci Eng 2004, 24: 413-419. 10.1016/j.msec.2003.11.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cruz et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.