Open Access

Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables and possible health risk assessment

SpringerPlus20132:385

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-385

Received: 29 July 2013

Accepted: 13 August 2013

Published: 15 August 2013

Abstract

Metal contamination in agricultural soils is of increasing concern due to food safety issues and potential health risks. Accumulation of Heavy and trace metals in vegetables occur by various sources but soil is considered the major one. Consumption of vegetables containing (heavy/trace) metals is one of the main ways in which these elements enter the human body. Once entered, heavy metals are deposited in bone and fat tissues, overlapping noble minerals and cause an array of diseases. The present study aimed to investigate the concentration of different metals in agricultural soil and vegetables grown on those soils and to evaluate the possible health risks to human body through food chain transfer. Contamination levels in soils and vegetables with metals were measured and transfer factors (TF) from soil to vegetables and its health risk were calculated accordingly. Results showed that concentration of Si, Ba, K, Ca, Mg Fe, Sc, V, Cr, Cu, Zn, As, Mn, Co, Ni, Se, Sr, Mo, and Cd in soil is higher than the World Average value and Al, Ti and Pb is lower than the World Average value whereas concentration of toxic elements like As, Co, Cu, Mn, Pb, Se, Ni, V and Zn in vegetable samples are below the World Average value. The intake of toxic metals (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn Co, Cr, V, Ni, Pb and Cd) from vegetables is not high and within the permissible limit recommended by WHO, Food & Nutritional Board and US EPA. The Hazard Quotient (HQ) for Fe, Cu, Co, Cr, V, Ni, Pb, Mn, Zn and Cd were calculated which showed a decreasing order of Cd>Mn>Zn>Pb>Cu>Fe>Ni>V=Co>Cr. Highest HQ value found for Cd (2.543) which is above the safe value.

Keywords

Daily intakeHazard quotientHealth risksMetal contaminationTransfer factors

Introduction

The accumulation of heavy metals and metalloids in agricultural soil is of increasing concern now a day. Potentially harmful metal in soil may come from the bedrock itself and anthropogenic sources like solid or liquid waste deposits, agricultural inputs and fallout of industrial and urban emissions (Wilson and Pyatt 2007). Excessive accumulation in agricultural soils results in soil contamination and has consequences for food quality and safety.

Food is the major intake source of toxic metals by human beings. Among food system, vegetables are the most exposed food to environmental pollution due to aerial burden. Vegetables take up heavy metals and accumulate them in their edible and non-edible parts at quantities high enough to cause clinical problems to both animals and human beings. Excessive content of metals beyond Maximum Permissible level (MPL) leads to number of nervous, cardiovascular, renal, neurological impairment as well as bone diseases and several other health disorders (WHO 1992; Steenland and Boffetta 2000; Jarup 2003).

Vegetables are an essential part of diet and are taken both cooked and raw forms by human. Vegetables act as buffering agents for acid generation during digestion (Maleki and Zarasvand 2008) and some metals present in vegetables are even important biochemically and psychologically from health point of view. Metals like cobalt (Co), chromium (III) (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), selenium (Se) and zinc (Zn) help in regulating human metabolism (Lokeshappa et al. 2012). Manganese is an essential elements act as an activator and constituent of many enzymes present in human (Sresty and Rao 1999). But some elements like Pb, Cd, As are very toxic for human. Lacatusu et al. (Lacatusu et al. 1996) reported that soil and vegetables contaminated with Pb and Cd in Copsa mica and Baia Mare, Romania, significantly contributed to decrease human life expectancy (9–10 years) within the affected areas. Other elements such as Cr, Co, and Ni although essential for human but at concentrations higher than those recommended may cause metabolic disorders.

Soil to plant transfer of heavy metals is the major path way of human exposure to metal contamination. The present study conducted measurement of heavy and trace metal level in the soil collected from Rooppur, Pabna as well as vegetables grown on the soil and determination of transfer factor of these elements to evaluate potential health effect of the people those who consumes those vegetables.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and preparation

Ten Soil samples were collected from the agricultural land at Ruppur area of Pabna District of Bangladesh and leveled as SS (SS1-SS10). The geographical coordinates of Ruppur area is 24° 4’ 0” North, 89° 2’ 0” East. It is situated by the side of river Padma. Available vegetables grown on those sites were collected as well. The detailed of the vegetable samples collected from the sites are given in Table 1 and the map of the sampling site is shown in Figure 1. The collected soil samples were dried at 60°C in an oven until constant weight was obtained. The dried samples were ground to fine power in an Agate mortar with a pestle and preserved in polyethylene bags in a desiccator for further analysis. The vegetable samples were first thoroughly washed with tap water and finally with deionized water. The samples were then dried in an oven at 60°C until constant weight was obtained. The dried samples were finally ground in a carbide mortar with a pestle and preserved in polyethylene bags in a desiccator until subsequent analysis.
Figure 1

Map of the Sample Location.

Table 1

Description of vegetable samples analyzed

Common name

Designation

Scientific name

Edible part

Spinach

SP

Beta vulgaris L

Leaf

Amaranthus

AM

Amaranthus caudatus L

Leaf

Brinjal

BR

Solanum melongena L

Fruit

Tomato

TO

Lycopersicon esculentum L

Fruit

Radish

RA

Raphanus sativus L

Root

Bean

BN

Phaseolus lunatus L

Fruit

Cauliflower

CF

Brassica oleracea L

Inflorescence

Carrot

CA

Daucus carota var sativus L

Root

Methods of analysis

The Panalytical Epsilon 5 Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) was used as major analytical technique for carrying out elemental analysis in the samples. The Panalytical Epsilon 5 EDXRF Spectrometer System is a fully integrated X-ray analysis system, combining a unique energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, with instrument control, analysis software and programmable automatic sample changer system was used. The spectrometer is provided with a low energy Gd X-ray tube of max. power 600 W to generate X-ray beam and a PAN-32 30 mm2 Ge X-ray detector with the energy resolution of <140 eV at 5.9 keV for detection of elemental characteristic X-rays emitted from the excited materials.

Sample irradiation with X-ray beam

For irradiation of the sample with X-ray beam 2 g of each powdered material was pressed into a pellet of 25 mm diameter with a pellet maker (Specac) and loaded into the X-ray excitation chamber with the help of automatic sample changer system. The irradiation of all real samples were performed by assigning a time-based programme, controlled by a software package provided with the system. The standard materials were also irradiated under similar experimental conditions for construction of the calibration curves for quantitative elemental determination in the respective samples. The generated X-ray spectra of the materials were stored into the computer.

Calculation of X-ray intensities

The X-ray intensities of the elements in sample spectrum were calculated using the system software by integration of area of the respective X-ray peak areas using peak fitting deconvolution software.

Data analysis

Calculation of oral intake of metals from soil through vegetables

Calculation of oral intake of metals from soil through vegetables was calculated following Cui et al. (2004).

Daily intake of metals (DIM) = daily vegetable consumption×mean vegetable metal concentrations (mg/day, fresh weight).

The required amount of vegetables in our daily diet must be 300 to 350 g per person has been suggested by WHO guideline (WHO 1998).

Calculation of health risk index of metal contamination of vegetable

Risk to human health by the intake of metal-contaminated vegetables was characterized using a hazard Quotient (HQ) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency US EPA 1989). HQ is the ratio between exposure and the reference oral dose (RfD). If the ratio is lower than one (1), there will be no obvious risk. An estimate of the potential hazard of metal to human health (HQ) through consumption of vegetables is determined by the following equation
HQ = Div × C metal / R f D × Bo

Where (Div) is the daily intake of vegetables (kg/day), (Cmetal) is the concentration of metal in the vegetable (mg/kg), RfD is the oral reference dose for the metal (mg/kg of body weight/day) and Bo is the human body weight (kg). Although the HQ-based risk assessment method does not provide a quantitative estimate for the probability of an exposed population experiencing a reverse health effect, it indeed provides an indication of health risk level due to exposure to pollutants (Chary et al. 2008).

Transfer factor

Metal concentration in the extracts of soils and plants were calculated on the basis of dry weight. The plant transfer factor (TF) was calculated as follows:
TF = C plant / C Soil

Where C plant and C soil represents the toxic metal concentration in extracts of plants and soils on dry weight basis, respectively.

Results and discussion

Concentration calibration

A direct comparison method based on EDXRF technique was used for elemental concentration measurement (Islam and Jolly 2007; Jolly et al. 2012). As the analysis is based on direct comparison, the standards of similar matrices were used for the construction of the calibration curve in order to avoid the matrix effect. Three soil standards (Soil-7/IAEA, Montana-1/2710a, Montana-2/2711a) and five plant standards (Apple Leaf/NIST 1516, Spinach/NIST 1570a, Orchard Leaf/NIST 1571, Tomato Leaf/NIST 1573a, and Peach Leaf/NIST 1574) were used for the construction of calibration curves for carrying out elemental analysis in soil and plant respectively. The calibration curve for each element was constructed based on the K X-ray or L X-ray intensities calculated for the respective elements present in standard samples. The curves were constructed by plotting the sensitivities of the elements as a function of their atomic number.

The validation of calibration curves constructed for elements present in the standards was checked through analysis of standard reference materials. The results obtained for elements of interest and certified values for corresponding elements are shown in the Table 2. All results in respect of certified known values were found to vary within the acceptable range of error.
Table 2

Comparison between present results and the certified values of standard reference materials (mg kg -1 )

Elements

Soil (Montana- 1)

Plant (spinach)

Results obtained

Certified values

Error

Results obtained

Certified values

Error

K

21113

21700

2.71

27729

29030

2.26

Ca

9136

9640

5.23

14483

15270

4.92

Mn

2128

2140

0.56

69.33

75.90

0.76

Fe

39685

43200

8.14

-

-

-

Ni

8.67

8.0

−8.38

-

-

-

Cu

3409

3420

0.32

13.30

12.20

−8.98

Zn

4179

4180

0.02

-

-

-

As

1441

1540

6.43

0.035

0.038

9.21

Se

1.2

1.0

−20.0

0.053

0.050

6.00

Pb

5382

5520

2.5

-

-

-

Concentration of major and toxic element in soil

The average concentration of major elements Al, Si, Ba, K, Ca, Mg, Ti and Fe of the surface soil are found 6.22, 35.06, 7.40, 2.10, 2.51, 1.25, 0.33, 3.43% respectively whereas the average concentration of toxic elements like Sc, V, Cr, Cu, Zn, As, Mn, Co, Ni, Se, Sr, Mo, Pb and Cd are found 12.01, 8.4, 58, 53, 98, 41, 691, 10.18, 23.81, 1.11, 142, 2.30, 15.0 and 0.84 mg kg-1 respectively. According to (Pendias and Pendias 2000) concentration of most of the elements except Al, Ti, Pb in the measured soil is higher than the World Average value. The elemental concentration in the soil follows a similar trend but varied according to the sampling location as shown in Figures 2 and 3
Figure 2

Variation of concentration of major elements (Ba, Al, Si, K, Ca, Mg, Fe) and (Ti, Mn, Rb, Sr) in soil with location.

Figure 3

Variation of concentration of toxic elements (Se, Mo, Cd) and (Sc, V, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, As) in soil with location.

Concentration of major and toxic element in vegetable samples

The mean concentration of macro & micronutrients and toxic elements showed variations among different vegetables collected from the sites (Table 3). Table 4 showed the relative abundance of different elements in the Agricultural product. Macronutrients (P, K, Ca and Fe) are abundant in all type of vegetables. Calcium is present in higher concentration in leafy vegetables than others. Iron is present in small quantities in all types of samples compared to other macronutrient and lowest concentration is found in Brinjal. Lokeshappa et al. (2012) studied the elemental concentration in different agricultural product and the results obtained are comparable with the present study. Among the micronutrient Cu and Zn is abundant in all varieties and concentration of zinc is high comparable to copper. Mn is present in Bean only with moderate concentration (26 mg/kg). Vanadium is present in spinach, amaranthus, carrot and radish while Cr is present in radish, amaranthus tomato and cauliflower in lower concentration. Co and Ni are found only in the leafy vegetables with lower concentration and within the permissible limit (Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed 1995).Toxic element like As (0.08-0.04 mg/kg), Se (0.20-0.03 mg/kg) and Pb (0.98-0.13 mg/kg) is present in almost all varieties of samples but concentration of As and Se is very low to contribute any toxic effect. On the other hand Pb showed comparatively higher value than the others which may be attributed to plants grown on the agricultural lands located near high ways. Sr and Cd are present in the leafy vegetable (amaranthus and spinach) in moderate concentration and ranges from 7.23 to 61.65 and 0.65 to 0.97 mg kg-1 respectively. Hence Cadmium is a dangerous element because it can be absorbed via alimentary tract; penetrate through placenta during pregnancy and damage membranes and DNA. (Wagner 1993) reported that vegetables may contribute to about 70% of Cd intake by human varying according to the level of consumption.
Table 3

Concentration of different elements in vegetable samples

Elements

Concentration, mg/kg

Spinach

Amaranthus

Brinjal

Tomato

Radish

Bean

Cauliflower

Carrot

P

2829 ±302

6306 ±259

5293 ±304

4716 ±323

6867 ±343

76444±335

6976 ±333

5108 ±317

K

32750 ±421

3506 ±399

23623 ±447

27924±467

29975 ±486

23273±453

30308 ±442

28581±425

Ca

12717 ±334

21858 ±353

4724 ±372

5050 ±334

7443 ±331

10039±345

6581 ±356

6441 ±342

V

0.26 ±0.08

0.15 ±0.09

<0.04

<0.04

0.11 ±0.07

<0.04

<0.04

0.13 ±0.07

Cr

<0.05

1.15 ±0.04

<0.05

0.51±0.03

1.68 ±0.08

<0.05

0.47 ±0.02

<0.05

Mn

<0.06

<0.06

<0.06

<0.06

<0.06

25.95 ±2.56

<0.06

<0.06

Fe

210.30 ±1.28

195.00 ±1.02

32.60 ±0.99

43.86 ±0.84

40.89 ±0.79

97.69 ±0.85

60.01 ±0.74

58.77 ±0.77

Co

0.35 ±0.09

0.37 ±0.07

<0.27

<0.27

<0.27

<0.27

<0.27

<0.27

Ni

<0.65

<0.65

<0.65

<0.65

0.87 ±0.13

<0.65

0.94 ±0.29

<0.65

Cu

5.59 ±0.33

4.87 ±0.35

6.69 ±0.37

3.62 ±0.29

4.45 ±0.34

5.91 ±0.22

4.59 ±0.35

5.35 ±0.31

Zn

112.24 ±0.47

55.42 ±0.45

40.14 ±0.43

31.1 ±0.43

25.78 ±0.46

68.34 ±0.44

42.05 ±0.43

45.28 ±0.45

As

<0.01

0.08 ±0.01

0.05 ±0.00

0.05 ±0.00

0.05 ±0.00

0.05 ±0.00

0.05 ±0.00

0.04 ±0.00

Se

0.08 ±0.02

0.03 ±0.00

0.16 ±0.01

0.14 ±0.01

0.10 ±0.00

0.08 ±0.00

0.20 ±0.01

0.09 ±0.00

Sr

23.75 ±0.23

61.65 ±0.38

<0.14

<0.14

7.23 ±0.28

<0.14

<0.14

<0.14

Cd

<0.06

0.97 ±0.07

<0.06

<0.06

0.65 ±0.05

<0.06

0.16 ±0.04

<0.06

Pb

0.98 ±0.00

0.96 ±0.01

0.83 ±0.14

0.12 ±0.00

0.51 ±0.06

0.65 ±005

0.23 ±0.00

0.72 ±0.03

Table 4

Relative abundance of different elements in the vegetables

Relative abundance of macronutrient in the vegetables

P

BN>CA>RA>AM>BR>CA>TO>SP

K

SP>CF>RA>CA>TO> BR>BN>AM

Ca

AM>SP>BN>RA>CF>CA>TO>BR

Fe

SP>AM>BN>CF>CA>TO>RA>BR

Relative abundance of micronutrient in the vegetables

V

SP> AM> CA> RA> Remaining in BDL (<0.04 mg kg-1)

Cr

RA> AM> TO> CF> Remaining in BDL (<0.05 mg kg-1)

Mn

BN> Remaining in BDL (<0.06 mg kg-1)

Co

AM> SP> Remaining in BDL (<0.27 mg kg-1)

Ni

CF >RA> Remaining in BDL (<0.65 mg kg-1)

Cu

BR >BN >SP> CA> CF >AM>RA> TO

Zn

SP> BN >AM> CA> CF> BR> TO >RA

Relative abundance of toxic element in the vegetables

As

AM> TO> RA =CF> BR> BN=CA>Remaining in BDL (<0.01 mg kg-1)

Se

CF >BR> TO> RA> CA> BN> SP> AM

Sr

AM> SP> RA> Remaining in BDL (<0.14 mg kg-1)

Cd

AM> RA> Remaining in BDL (<0.06 mg kg-1)

Pb

SP >AM> BR> CA> BN> RA> CF> TO

Transfer factors (TF) from soil to vegetables

The TF values for K, Ca, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Cd, and Pb for various vegetables varied greatly between plant species and locations (Table 5).From the Table 5 it is observed that K, Ca and Zn has higher transfer factor for all types of vegetables and ranges from 0.167 (Amaranthus caudatus L) to 1.559 (Beta vulgaris L), 0.189(Solanum melongena L) to 0.872 (Amaranthus caudatus L) and 0.263 (Raphanus sativus L) to 1.148 (Beta vulgaris L) respectively. Transfer factor for V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and As is very low compared to other elements in all varieties of vegetables. The TF value for Se is quite high in most of the vegetables and ranges from 0.031 (Amaranthus caudatus L) to 0.147 (Solanum melongena L) and the TF value for Cu (0.069-0.127) and Sr (0.051-0.433) is medium. The TF value for toxic element Cd (0.192-1.161) is quite high compared to Pb (0.008-0.065) but Cd is found only in three varieties of vegetables. The leafy vegetables are found to show a higher transfer factor among the studied vegetables (Table 5). The present result agrees with the investigation made by (Zhuang et al. 2009) in the food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China where the Bio-accumulation factors for heavy metals were significantly higher for leafy than non-leafy vegetables. Soil electrolyte plays an important role in the process of metal transfer. The electrochemical properties of soil reflected through the temperature, pH, and electrolyte concentration etc. thus influenced the migration transformation ability of toxic metal indirectly. In a study, (S. Satter 2012) found that the transfer of Zn and Pb from soil of Tegharia union at Keraniganj, Dhaka, Bangladesh to plant Enhydra fluctuans and Oryza sativa is 1.762 and 1.05; and 5.519 and 1.20 respectively which is quite high, similarly transfer factor (TF) of Mn is also high in Enhydra fluctuans (1.553). As these two plants are widely consumed by human, through these plants toxic elements can be transferred to human body creating disruption in various biological systems. Therefore, workers and the residents of theses areas are in high health risks of toxic metal exposure.
Table 5

Transfer factor from soil to vegetables

Elements

Transfer factor

Spinach

Amaranthus

Brinjal

Tomato

Radish

Bean

Cauliflower

Carrot

K

1.559

0.167

1.124

1.329

1.426

1.108

1.442

1.360

Ca

0.507

0.872

0.189

0.202

0.300

0.401

0.262

0.257

V

0.003

0.002

-

-

0.001

-

-

0.002

Cr

-

0.02

-

0.009

0.029

-

0.008

-

Mn

-

-

-

-

-

0.038

-

-

Fe

0.006

0.006

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.003

0.002

0.002

Co

0.035

0.036

-

0.023

-

0.02

0.025

0.020

Ni

-

-

-

-

0.037

-

0.039

-

Cu

0.106

0.092

0.127

0.069

0.084

0.112

0.087

0.101

Zn

1.148

0.567

0.411

0.318

0.263

0.699

0.430

0.463

As

-

0.002

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

Se

0.069

0.031

0.147

0.126

0.088

0.072

0.178

0.081

Sr

0.167

0.433

-

-

0.051

-

-

-

Cd

-

1.161

-

-

0.778

-

0.192

-

Pb

0.065

0.064

0.055

0.008

0.034

0.043

0.015

0.048

Daily intake of metals by human beings from mixed vegetable

Table 6 shows approximate daily intake of metals by human beings from mixed vegetables. The intake values are calculated by taking the average value of metals in all the eight varieties of the vegetables (Table 1) and considering that each person (assuming 70 kg of body weight) consumes approximately 300 g (WHO 1998) of vegetables per day. Hence different vegetables are consumed variably by different segment of population at different time throughout the year, so it may be a realistic estimate for the average intake of metals from vegetables. It may be how ever be seen in Table 6 that intake of toxic metals except Mn, Zn and Cd from vegetables is not high and within the permissible limits recommended by various agencies (Friberg et al. 1984; Food and Nutritional board 2004; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [US EPA] 2010; World Health Organisation [WHO] 1993; World Health Organisation [WHO] and WHO 2004). However intake of Mn and Zn is comparable to the suggestive value but value of Cd is really alarming.
Table 6

Estimated Daily Intake of Metal (DIM) through vegetables

Trace elements

Average conc. Of 8 vegetables (μg/g)

Intake by human being (mg/g)

RfDa(mg/day)

References

Fe

92.390

27.72

10.0-60.0

WHO 1994

Cu

5.134

1.54

2.0-3.0

WHO 1994

Mn

25.950

7.79

0.5-5.0

WHO 1994

Zn

52.544

15.76

15.00

WHO 1994

Co

0.268

0.080

3.010

Food and Nutrition Board, 2004

Cr

0.953

0.286

105

US EPA 2010

V

0.161

0.048

1.80

WHO 2004

Ni

0.905

0.272

1.400

US EPA 2010

Pb

0.625

0.188

0.245

WHO 1993

Cd

0.593

0.178

0.070

US EPA 2010

aRfD is the oral reference dose for the metal (mg/kg body weight/day).

Potential hazard of metal to human health (HQ)

The Hazard Quotient (HQ) for Fe, Cu, Co, Cr, V, Ni, Pb, Mn, Zn and Cd were 0.462, 0.513, 0.027, 0.0003, 0.027, 0.194, 0.767, 1.558, 1.051 and 2.543 respectively. The sequence of HQ for the elements followed the decreasing order Cd>Mn>Zn>Pb>Cu>Fe>Ni>V=Co>Cr. (Huang et al. 2008) calculate HQ value ( Huang et al.2008) for Cd, Ni, Pb, Co, Cr in different vegetables in Khunshan, China and found the sequence of HQ in a decreasing order Pb>Cd>Ni>Co>Cr. The HQ value for all the elements except Mn, Zn and Cd were bellow 1(one), which is considered safe but Mn, Cd, Zn shows a HQ value higher than 1, so there is concern for potential health effect (Huang et al. 2008).

Conclusions

Metal contamination in Soil is receiving increasing attention all over the world. Principally there are two major pathways for human exposure to soil contamination: soil-plant-human (foodchain pathway) and soil-human (incidental soil ingestion). The present study focused on foodchain pathway. Concentration of different elements in vegetables depends upon the relative level of exposure of plants to the contaminated soil as well as the deposition of toxic elements in the polluted air by sedimentation. In the present study it was found that concentration of Si, Ba, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Sc, V, Cr, Cu, Zn, As, Mn, Co, Ni, Se, Sr, Mo and Cd in soil samples were higher than the World Average value. As there is no industrial unit near the study area, it seems soil of that area naturally have high concentrations of those elements which may be come from atmospheric deposition by air or other anthropogenic sources.

The elemental concentrations of the studied vegetables varied in different samples and hence variations in elemental concentrations among different varieties reflect the difference in uptake capabilities and their further translocation to the edible portion of the plants. According to (Pendias and Pendias 2000) concentration of the toxic element like As, Co, Cu, Mn, Pb, Se, Ni, V and Zn are below the World Average value (Pendias and Pendias 2000).

Soil-to-plant transfer is one of the key components of human exposure to metals through foodchain. In this study, the soil-to-plant transfer Factor (TF) for various metals and for most common vegetables consumed by human being were calculated (Table 5) and the data showed that the TF values differed significantly between locations and plant species. The difference in TF values between locations may be related to soil nutrient management and soil properties.

The daily intake of metals (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, Co, Cr, V, Ni, Pb, Cd) for human with a average body weight 70 kg have been calculated (Table 6) and found that intake of toxic metals from vegetables is not high and within the suggestive values. The calculated Hazard Quotient (HQ) for the above elements except Mn, Zn and Cd is found below 1 which indicates safe with no risk to human health. Higher HQ value for Mn and Zn may not pose risk to human health because these are the essential elements for human. Further in most of the vegetables concentration of Mn is found below the detection level except bean. Zn is an airborne pollutant, so in general it majorly accumulates to open and above-earth vegetables. The daily intake of Cd was estimated 0.178 mg/g and HQ value for Cd calculated was 2.543 which is much higher than the safe value. Cd is very toxic element, its long term exposure to lower level leads to build up in kidneys and possible kidney disease, lung damage and fragile bones. Hypertension, arthritis, diabetes, anaemia, cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroks etc. are its some odd long term results (Arsenic in Drinking Water 1999). Further Cd is not found in all varieties of vegetables. Only Amaranthus, Radish and Cauliflower showed the presence of Cd. It is therefore suggested to consume those vegetables at lower amount in the diet to reduce any toxic effect.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciated the help and association of the stuff members of Chemistry Division, Atomic Energy Centre, Dhaka.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chemistry Division, Atomic Energy Centre
(2)
Nuclear Power and Energy Division, Atomic Energy Commission

References

  1. NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council): Arsenic in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: NAS/NRC (National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council); 1999:251-257.Google Scholar
  2. Cui YJ, Zhu YG, Zhai RH, Chen DY, Huang YZ, Qui Y, Liang JZ: Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables in an area near a smelter in Nanning, China. Environ Int 2004, 30: 785-791. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.01.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Codex general standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. 1995. Available at: - Accessed Mar.10, 2010 http://www.codexalimentarius.net/download/standards/17/CXS_193e.pdf Available at: - Accessed Mar.10, 2010Google Scholar
  4. Chary NS, Kamala CT, Raj DSS: Assessing risk of heavy metals from consuming food grown on sewage irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2008, 69: 513-524. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Friberg L, Nordberg GF, Vpuk B: Handbook on the Toxicity of Metals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland, Bio Medical Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Food and Nutritional Board Dietary Reference Intakes [DRIs]. In Recommended Intake for Individuals. Washington, DC: USA: National Academy of Sciences; 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Huang ML, Zhou SL, Sun B, Zhao QG: Heavy metals in wheat grains: assessment of potential health risk for inhabitants in Khunshan China. Sci Tota Env 2008, 405: 54-61. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Islam A, Jolly YN: Heavy metals in water and fishes of the tannery affected vicinity of the river buriganga. J Bang Aca Sci 2007, 31(2):163-171.Google Scholar
  9. Jarup L: Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 2003, 68: 167-82. 10.1093/bmb/ldg032View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jolly YN, Chowdhury TR, Islam A, Suravi NI, Sultana MS: Background chemical study of relocated hazaribagh tannery complex environment. Savar J Bang Aca Sci 2012, 36(1):45-51.Google Scholar
  11. Lokeshappa B, Shivpuri K, Tripath V, Dikshit AK: Assessment of toxic metals in agricultural product. Food Pub Heat 2012, 2(1):24-29. 10.5923/j.fph.20120201.05View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lacatusu R, Rauta C, Carstea S, Ghelase I: Soil - plant relationships in heavy metal polluted areas in Romania. Appl Geochem 1996, 11: 105-107. 10.1016/0883-2927(95)00101-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Maleki , Zarasvand : Heavy metals in selected edible vegetables and estimation of their daily intake in Sanandaj, Iran. Southeast Asian j Trop Med Public Health 2008, 39(2):335-340.Google Scholar
  14. Pendias AK, Pendias H: Trace elements in Soils and Plants. 3rd edition. FL, United States: CRC press; 2000:10-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sresty TVS, Rao KVM: Ultra structural alternation in response to zinc and nickel stress in the root cells of pea. J Env Exp Bot 1999, 41: 3-13. 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00034-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Steenland K, Boffetta P: Lead and cancer in humans: where are we now? Am J Ind Med 2000, 38: 295-299. 10.1002/1097-0274(200009)38:3<295::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Satter S: Transfer of trace elements from Soil to Plants in Industrial Area of Dhaka and its health risk. Savar, Bangladesh: M.Sc Thesis, Department of Environmental Science, Jahangirnagar University; 2012.Google Scholar
  18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Human Health Evaluation Manual [part A]: Interim Final. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection agency; 1989. [EPA/540/1-89/002]Google Scholar
  19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [US EPA]: Integrated Risk Information System. 2010. Available at: [Accessed Jan. 08, 2010] http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/compare.cfm Available at: [Accessed Jan. 08, 2010]Google Scholar
  20. WHO: Health guideline for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture. Report of WHO science group, world health organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Tech Rep Sci 1998, 778: 10.Google Scholar
  21. World Health Organisation [WHO]: Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. In Forty-First Report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1993. WHO Technical Series, 837Google Scholar
  22. WHO: Cadmium Environmental Health Criteria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992:134.Google Scholar
  23. World Health Organisation [WHO]: Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. In Sixty-First Report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Technical Series, 922; 2004.Google Scholar
  24. Wilson B, Pyatt FB: Heavy metal dispersion, persistence and bioaccumulation around an ancient copper mine situated Anglesey, UK. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2007, 66: 224-231. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.02.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wangner GJ: Accumulation of cadmium in crop plants and its consequences to human health. Adv Agron 1993, 51: 173-212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia H, Li N, Li Z: Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407: 1551-1561. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.061View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jolly et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.