Open Access

Permeability and distribution of nerve growth factor in the brain of neonatal rats by periphery venous injection in hypoxic-ischemic state

  • Wenli Zhou1,
  • Jiantao Zhang2,
  • Guangming Wang3,
  • Limian Ling2 and
  • Chaoying Yan1Email author
Contributed equally
SpringerPlus20165:1893

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3594-2

Received: 14 February 2016

Accepted: 21 October 2016

Published: 28 October 2016

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the permeability of β-NGF through blood–brain-barrier (BBB) in neonatal and adult rats, and the spatial distribution of β-NGF in different brain regions in hypoxic-ischemic (HI) and normal neonatal rats.

Methods

To investigate the overall permeability of β-NGF through BBB, β-NGF labeled with I125 was injected into adult rats, neonatal rats and HI neonatal rats via tail vein. The radioactivity of brain tissue and blood was examined and analyzed 30 min after injection. Also, brain regions including the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, cerebellum, bulbus olfactorius and hypophysis, of all the rats were dissected and radioactivity was examined to investigate the spatial specificity of NGF permeation through BBB.

Results

Statistically significant results were observed in I125-β-NGF contents in brain tissues of adult rats group, neonatal rats group and HI neonatal rats group (P < 0.05). Compared to the HI neonatal rats’ brain with the highest I125-β-NGF contents, normal neonatal rats ranks the second while the adult rats were the lowest. While for the spatial specificity examination part, I125-β-NGF in both HI group and control group were widely distributed in basal forebrain, frontal cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum and bulbus olfactorius. But the radioactivity in frontal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum of HI groups are statistically higher than control groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

β-NGF can more easily penetrate the BBB of newborn rats than adult rats via peripheral venous administration and this effect can be enhanced by HI insult. Also, this HI-induced permeation of β-NGF through BBB is more obvious in frontal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum.

Keywords

Nerve growth factor Hypoxic Ischemic Blood–brain barrier

Background

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, also named as HIE, is one type of brain damage caused by prolonged insufficient blood and oxygen supply (Fatemi et al. 2009). HIE in the perinatal period is one of the most important factors leading to cerebral palsy and associated disabilities in children (Fatemi et al. 2009), while cerebral palsy is one of the most costly neurologic disabilities with an incidence of 0.2% in neonates of USA and can persists for a whole life for the affected children. The options for the treatment in HIE are quite limited and most of them are only supportive therapies including seizure control, blood pressure control and etc.

Nerve growth factor is a neurotrophic factor and neuropeptide. Interestingly, studies (Cortazzo et al. 1996; Nguyen et al. 2010; Satoh et al. 1999) found that nerve growth factor (NGF) can prevent apoptosis of neuron cells including the neural crest cells (Cortazzo et al. 1996; Satoh et al. 1999) and hippocampal cells (Nguyen et al. 2010). Mechanisms include the enhancement of superoxide anion production and suppression of hydrogen peroxide, and blockage of apoptotic cascade (Cortazzo et al. 1996; Nguyen et al. 2010). Also, Lindvall et al. (1994) found that brain damage can lead to an increase of endogenous NGF, which may contribute to nerve protection effect (Fan et al. 2007). In normal physiological conditions, NGF is one of the nerve cell growth regulatory factors involved in the proliferation, maintenance and survival in the neural cells, and is maintained at a moderately low level in the brain. In spite of the protective role of endogenous NGF in hypoxic insults or other damage of brain, the endogenous NGF is still quite limited and is difficult to exert long-lasting protection from the damage (O’Driscoll and Gorman 2005; Lindvall et al. 1992).

As the development of natural model NGF and β-NGF-cDNA cloned, exogenous NGF came to be an available therapeutic agent for neurological diseases (Bowes et al. 2000; Lorigados Pedre et al. 2002). Even though NGF is only 12 kDa in its mature form, it’s still hard for NGF to penetrate through Blood–Brain-Barrier (BBB). However, as a potential nerve cell protectant, whether and when NGF can better penetrate the blood brain barrier or be absorbed by the brain tissue is still controversial. In this paper, we studied the permeability of β-NGF through BBB and examined the absorption and distribution of NGF in newborn rats with hypoxic-ischemic brain damage, neonatal rats and adult rats in healthy condition.

Methods

Main reagents and instruments

β-NGF, I125, Sephadex G-25 medium, RSS-5100 portable digital oxygen meter, FT-613-automatic I125 radioactivity meter, Electronic scale, 70–80 days adult Wistar Rats, neonatal Wistar rats (7 days after birth). All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jinlin University in Changchun, Jilin. All data were represented as mean ± SD.

I125 labeling of β-NGF

Chloramine T method: 118.6 µg β-NGF, 100 ml chloramine T fluid (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.2, dissolved in PBS) and 2 mCi I125 were mixed at room temperature allowing the reaction to proceed for 3 min. Then 400 µl NaS2O2 was added into the system allowing to proceed for 1 min at room temperature to terminate the reaction. The mixture was then filtered through glucan coagulation G-25 column and the elution from equilibrium liquid was collected. 10% trichloroacetic precipitation method was used to measure the labelling efficiency. Merge labelling rate ≥83.367% elution with the specific activity at 14.0585 uCi/ug was collected and stored at 4 °C.

The establishment of HI brain damage model

An atmospheric oxygen cabin sized at 40 × 50 × 60 cm was made with two 2 × 2 cm holes on both sides. Electric blanket tank was used to control the environment temperature and soda lime was used to absorb moisture and CO2. The air within the cabin was monitored by nitrogen and oxygen conditioning test instrument (temperature is 36 ± 1 °C, oxygen concentration at 8%). Neonatal rats was kept in the cabin under hypoxic condition for 1.5 h discontinued with normoxic condition. After anoxia 30–60 min all rats manifested as cyanosis, head shaking, limb jitterring and hyperactivity. When we do HE-staining HI manifestations such as swelling, shrivel, depigmentation and bleeding can be seen (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The illustration of neonatal HI rats nerve cells’ swelling with vacuoles formation (a), depigmentation (a) and hemorrhage with red blood cells leakage from the blood vessel (b) in hippocampus of rat. Also, the brain section of healthy neonatal rat is shown in c

Demographic details of each group and injection dosage

Part 1: overall radioactivity assessment

Adult rats group: 8 rats, 70–80 days, weight to 200.4 ± 10.1 g, tail vein injection of I125-β-NGF 5ug/kg; normal neonatal rats group: 8 rats, born in 7 days, weight 15.8 ± 1.4 g, intravenous injection I125-β-NGF 5ug/kg; HI neonatal rats group: 8 rats, born in 7 days, weight 15.2 ± 1.6 g, intravenous injection I125-β-NGF 5ug/kg.

Part 2: tissue specific radioactivity assessment

HI group: 16 rats, born in 7 days, weight 14.9 ± 1.7 g, hypoxia model, 8 rats to inject I125-β-NGF, and 8 rats to inject I125.

Control group: 16 rats, born in 7 days, weight 15.1 ± 1.6 g, no HI intervention, 8 rats to inject I125-β-NGF, and 8 rats to inject I125.

Experimental design

Part 1: overall radioactivity assessment

After the 30 min hypoxic treatment (or control treatment), adult rats group, HI neonatal group and control neonatal group were isoflurane anesthetized and euthanized by jugular vein bloodletting method. The pia mater were removed carefully followed by brain tissue separation and blood collection at the same time. The blood and brain tissue were weighed by electronic scales and the radioactivity of each rat was measured within 12 h.

Part 2: tissue specific radioactivity assessment

After 30 min pre-treatment and all rats were isoflurane anesthetized and sacrificed, different brain parts of the rats were dissected on ice including olfactory bulb, the frontal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus region, the cerebellum, the pituitary gland. Gamma free analyzer was adopted for radioactivity measurement.

Part 3: apoptotic analysis via TUNEL assay

After radioactivity measurement of all the brain tissues, samples were collected for 0.4% paraformaldehyde fixation for 15 min followed with paraffin-wax embedding. Slides were cut and stained with H&E staining and Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay, as described by the protocol from the kit (MK1020, Boster, Wuhan, China).

Statistical analysis

SPSS17.0 statistic software was used for data analysis and one-way ANOVA was used to decide the statistical significance. All experiments involved were repeated at least three times and data in this paper were shown as mean ± SD. A P value less than 0.05 is set to be statistically significant.

Results

Part 1: overall I125-β-NGF level in brain and blood of each group

Table 1 suggest there are significant difference (P < 0.05) of I125-β-NGF content in adult rats (51.21 ± 3.40 Ci/g), normal neonatal rats (130.74 ± 6.84 Ci/g) and neonatal HI rats (165.83 ± 8.74 Ci/g), among of which the neonatal HI group (165.83 ± 8.74 Ci/g) has the highest level of radioactivity (Fig. 2a). In the meantime, after normalization with blood I125-β-NGF (adult rats: 1798.61 ± 116.66 Ci/g; Normal neonatal rats: 1908.96 ± 62.71 Ci/g; Neonatal HI rats: 899.89 ± 162.96 Ci/g), brain I125-β-NGF of the adult rats group (2.86 ± 0.25%) is the lowest, normal neonatal rats group (6.85 ± 0.50%) take the second place, and neonatal HI rats group (8.75 ± 0.33%) is the highest (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b).
Table 1

The I125-β NGF level in brain and blood by vein injection (Ci/g, n=8)

Group

Adult rats

Normal neonatal rats

Neonatal HI rats

Brain

51.21 ± 3.40#

130.74 ± 6.84**

165.83 ± 8.74*

Blood

1798.61 ± 116.66

1908.96 ± 62.71

899.89 ± 162.96

Percentage%

2.86 ± 0.25#

6.85 ± 0.50**

8.75 ± 0.33*

The adult rats’ brain can detain the fewest NGF at (2.86 ± 0.25)%, normal neonatal rats ranked the middle at (6.85 ± 0.50)% and neonatal HI rats can detain the most NGF at (8.75 ± 0.33)%

# versus ** P < 0.05; # versus * P < 0.01; ** versus * P < 0.05

Fig. 2

The comparison of I125-β-NGF level in brain via vein injection. The I125-β-NGF level in the brain of adult rats, normal neonatal rats and neonatal HI rats were determined quantitatively and neonatal HI rats would detain the most I125-β-NGF, while adult rats detain the least (a). Similar difference in the retention rate were found as we normalized the radioactivity of the brain to the blood between these three groups (b). (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)

Part 2: I125-β-NGF distribution in the brain of neonatal rats

In normal control group, I125-β-NGF absorption was obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain (1273.333 ± 376.600 vs 518.000 ± 61.454 counts/min), frontal cortex (1185.500 ± 371.714 vs 443.833 ± 101.075 counts/min), cerebellum (2505.000 ± 665.695 vs 745.000 ± 100.349 counts/min), hippocampus (1686.833 ± 534.053 vs 628.000 ± 140.274 counts/min), and olfactory bulb (1672.667 ± 500.930 vs 629.000 ± 105.284 counts/min) (P < 0.05); I125-β-NGF in HI group absorb obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain (1845.667 ± 534.705 vs 767.833 ± 116.393 counts/min), frontal cortex (3151.333 ± 872.215 vs 928.000 ± 130.545 counts/min), cerebellum (4243.833 ± 1097.127 vs 1001.000 ± 203.048 counts/min), hippocampus (2736.167 ± 873.323 vs 637.000 ± 151.060 counts/min), and olfactory bulb (2036.167 ± 620.084 vs 715.000 ± 130.026 counts/min) (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3; Table 2).
Fig. 3

Comparison of radioactivity absorption in different brain regions. I125-β-NGF absorption was higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb; I125-β-NGF in HI group absorb obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb. No statistically significant difference were observed in other regions of the brain (*P < 0.05)

Table 2

Comparison of radioactivity absorption in different brain regions (counts per minute, \( \bar{x} \) ± s)

Brain region

Control group

HI group

I125-NGF

I125

I125-NGF

I125

BF

1273.333 ± 376.600

518.000 ± 61.454

1845.667 ± 534.705

767.833 ± 116.393

CF

1185.500 ± 371.714

443.833 ± 101.075

3151.333 ± 872.215

928.000 ± 130.545

CB

2505.000 ± 665.695

745.000 ± 100.349

4243.833 ± 1097.127

1001.000 ± 203.048

HF

1686.833 ± 534.053

628.000 ± 140.274

2736.167 ± 873.323

637.000 ± 151.060

HY

789.333 ± 123.072

595.333 ± 145.446

919.000 ± 145.213

686.500 ± 131.991

OB

1672.667 ± 500.930

629.000 ± 105.284

2036.167 ± 620.084

715.000 ± 130.026

PI

796.333 ± 89.189

684.333 ± 93.520

936.500 ± 184.183

755.333 ± 94.118

I125-β-NGF absorption was obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb (P < 0.05); I125-β-NGF in HI group absorb obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb (P < 0.05)

BF basal forebrain, CF frontal cortex, CB cerebellum, HF hypocampus, HY hypothalamus, OB bulbus olfactorius, PI hypophysis

I125-β-NGF in HI group absorb obviously higher than that of I125-β-NGF in normal control group in the frontal cortex (3151.333 ± 872.215 vs 1185.500 ± 371.714 counts/min), cerebellum (4243.833 ± 1097.127 vs 2505.000 ± 665.695 counts/min) and hippocampus (2736.167 ± 873.323 vs 1686.833 ± 534.053 counts/min) (P < 0.05). NGF HI group absorb in the basal forebrain (1845.667 ± 534.705 vs 1273.333 ± 376.600 counts/min), hypothalamus (919.000 ± 145.213 vs 789.333 ± 123.072 counts/min), olfactory bulb (2036.167 ± 620.084 vs 1672.667 ± 500.930 counts/min) and hypophysis (936.500 ± 184.183 vs 796.333 ± 89.189 counts/min) have no obvious difference to NGF normal group in the above areas (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Part 3: NGF supplement ameliorated the apoptosis in the hippocampus region

As shown in Fig. 4, there are much more cells undergoing apoptosis after HI insult in the brain. Also, as we apply NGF in the neonatal HI group, we found the apoptosis in the hippocampus of neonatal HI group with NGF injection is much milder compared to control group with only I125 injection. In addition, the injection of NGF in the adult rats group does not made any changes in the hippocampus region.
Fig. 4

The TUNEL assay in the hippocampus region of the adult normal rats with NGF injection, the neonatal normal rats with NGF injection, the neonatal HI rats with NGF injection, neonatal HI rats with PBS injection

Discussion

Up to date, consensus has been reached in the therapeutic use of NGF via peripheral vein in the repair and regeneration in central nervous system (Kamei et al. 2007; Gould et al. 2000; Ferenz et al. 2012). However, because of the uniqueness of central nervous system, the blood-cerebrospinal barrier or blood–brain barrier (BBB) makes it ineffective for most drugs entering the brain (Smith et al. 2004). At present, most of the experiments use the embedded method or lateral ventricle injection, which requires intensive staff training and the successful rate of which largely depend on the operators’ skill. Also, lateral ventricular injection would lead to cerebral edema and increase the risk of infection, therefore its clinical application is greatly limited. Before the start of this study, we made a preliminary investigation on NGF level in adult rat’s brain tissues after intravenous injection and it showed that fractional amount of NGF pass through the blood brain barrier after peripheral injection of NGF, and the peak can only be achieved 30 min after intravenous injection (data not shown).

The result indicates that, the BBB permeability of NGF in newborn rat is far better than that of adult rats after intravenous injection, especially in hypoxic state. Also, in the study of NGF’s spatial distribution in different brain regions, we noticed that the uptake of I125-NGF in normal group and hypoxia group was obviously higher than that of I125 in the basal forebrain, frontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus and olfactory bulb, suggesting that NGF can overtly penetrating the blood–brain barrier in these brain areas. Moreover, I125-NGF hypoxia group absorption is significantly higher than normal control group in the frontal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum (P < 0.05). This finding demonstrates that the newborn rat under hypoxia condition have better permeability of blood brain barrier to NGF thus it’s might be efficacious to administer venous NGF for neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

The mechanism of HI-neonates brain’s high permeable BBB can be explained as follows: (1) BBB is not intact in physiological state. There are different defects on BBB in areas as median eminence, the hypothalamus endplate vascular bed, sub-dome and choroid area. NGF may go through these areas into the brain tissue. (2) Hafny found that NGF may activate the gamma transpeptidase glutamic acid and alkaline phosphatase in BBB endothelial cells, which can transform those “guardian cells” of BBB into the transfer state (el Hafny et al. 1996). (3) The BBB of newborn rat is still immature thus more permeable to substances as NGF. (4) Recently Moser et al. (2004), Calza et al. (2001) prove that NGF can act as a angiogenic factor or indirectly interact with VEGF, promoting the proliferation of brain capillary endothelial cells and selectively inducing angiogenesis after cerebral ischemia, thus making the brain vessels more active in a pathophysiological state. (5) In hypoxic condition, a large number of free radicals would damage the integrity endothelial cells and glial cells’ membrane thus damaging blood–brain barrier. Also, some special transport mechanisms (Arnett et al. 2007) in HI state as unsaturated diffusion (depending on the bond energy of hydrogen bonding), saturation transport system (for a specific carrier) and etc. would make peripheral peptide drugs pass through the BBB possible (Zhang et al. 1999). In our experiment, exogenous NGF can pass through the blood brain barrier in normal state and anoxic state, and in both circumstances it can be absorbed in Cornu Ammonis significantly. So does in the cerebral cortex, the olfactory bulb, the basal forebrain and cerebellum, the distribution of which are basically the same with endogenous NGF in physiological condition (Tian et al. 2012). However, the endogenous NGF react differently in neonatal rats with hypoxia injury as compared to adult rats in the same condition. Compared to adult rats in HI state, NGF level drops quickly after hypoxia insult in newborn hippocampus followed with delayed increase in cerebellum (Scheepens et al. 2003). Therefore, it is promising that exogenous NGF can be therapeutic agents when endogenous NGF in early stages of HI insult cannot meet the actual need of the brain, by means of which increase the survival of neurons and improve the brain function after hypoxia. The application of NGF in early stages of hypoxia can limit neuron’s injury after ischemia (Lee et al. 2008). Also, the combination therapy of mesenchymal stem cells and NGF in stroke patients might also be promising to improve the life quality of patients (Jiang et al. 2013). While for the negative results in our experiments, it is speculated that NGF’s permeation through the olfactory bulb, hypothalamus, basal forebrain and hypophysis are still limited even in HI state. Also, it still cannot be ruled out that the inspection duration of this experiments might be too short to get a statistically significant difference.

Therefore, it is still in great need to further investigate the mechanism of BBB in hypoxic-ischemic state and enhance the permeability of exogenous NGF, thus improving the prognosis of patients with hypoxic and ischemic encephalopathy as strokes.

Conclusion

β-NGF can more easily penetrate the BBB of newborn rats than adult rats via peripheral venous administration and can be enhanced by HI insult. Also, this HI-induced influx of β-NGF through BBB is more obvious in frontal cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum.

Notes

Abbreviations

BBB: 

blood-brain-barrier

HI: 

hypoxia-ischemia

BF: 

basal forebrain

CF: 

frontal cortex

CB: 

cerebellum

HF: 

hypocampus

HY: 

hypothalamus

OB: 

bulbus olfactorius

PI: 

hypophysis

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

WZ drafted the manuscript and participated in the experiment design; JZ made the animal study; GW and LL made the radioactivity measurement and statistical analysis; CY designed the experiment; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all our coworkers who contributed to this work and all rats that were sacrificed in our study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neonatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University
(2)
Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University
(3)
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University

References

  1. Arnett MG, Ryals JM, Wright DE (2007) Pro-NGF, sortilin, and p75NTR: potential mediators of injury-induced apoptosis in the mouse dorsal root ganglion. Brain Res 1183:32–42View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowes M, Tuszynski MH, Conner J, Zivin JA (2000) Continuous intrathecal fluid infusions elevate nerve growth factor levels and prevent functional deficits after spinal cord ischemia. Brain Res 883(2):178–183View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Calza L, Giardino L, Giuliani A, Aloe L, Levi-Montalcini R (2001) Nerve growth factor control of neuronal expression of angiogenetic and vasoactive factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(7):4160–4165View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortazzo MH, Kassis ES, Sproul KA, Schor NF (1996) Nerve growth factor (NGF)-mediated protection of neural crest cells from antimitotic agent-induced apoptosis: the role of the low-affinity NGF receptor. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 16(12):3895–3899Google Scholar
  5. el Hafny B, Bourre JM, Roux F (1996) Synergistic stimulation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activities by retinoic acid and astroglial factors in immortalized rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 167(3):451–460View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan GXX, Zhu W, Ma Y, Liu X (2007) Effect of noninvasive intranasal delivery nerve growth factor on sarin-induced brain damage. Cerebrovasc Dis 24:483–494View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fatemi A, Wilson MA, Johnston MV (2009) Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in the term infant. Clin Perinatol 36(4):835–viiGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferenz KB, Gast RE, Rose K, Finger IE, Hasche A, Krieglstein J (2012) Nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor but not granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, nimodipine and dizocilpine, require ATP for neuroprotective activity after oxygen-glucose deprivation of primary neurons. Brain Res 1448:20–26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gould HJ 3rd, Gould TN, England JD, Paul D, Liu ZP, Levinson SR (2000) A possible role for nerve growth factor in the augmentation of sodium channels in models of chronic pain. Brain Res 854(1–2):19–29View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang Y, Zhu W, Zhu J, Wu L, Xu G, Liu X (2013) Feasibility of delivering mesenchymal stem cells via catheter to the proximal end of the lesion artery in patients with stroke in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. Cell Transplant 22(12):2291–2298View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamei N, Tanaka N, Oishi Y, Hamasaki T, Nakanishi K, Sakai N, Ochi M (2007) BDNF, NT-3, and NGF released from transplanted neural progenitor cells promote corticospinal axon growth in organotypic cocultures. Spine 32(12):1272–1278View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee TH, Yang JT, Ko YS, Kato H, Itoyama Y, Kogure K (2008) Influence of ischemic preconditioning on levels of nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and their high-affinity receptors in hippocampus following forebrain ischemia. Brain Res 1187:1–11View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindvall O, Ernfors P, Bengzon J, Kokaia Z, Smith ML, Siesjö BK, Persson H (1992) Differential regulation of mRNAs for nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and neurotrophin 3 in the adult rat brain following cerebral ischemia and hypoglycemic coma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(2):648–652View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindvall O, Kokaia Z, Bengzon J, Elmer E, Kokaia M (1994) Neurotrophins and brain insults. Trends Neurosci 17(11):490–496View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lorigados Pedre L, Pavon Fuentes N, Alvarez Gonzalez L, McRae A, Serrano Sanchez T, Blanco Lescano L, Macias Gonzalez R (2002) Nerve growth factor levels in Parkinson disease and experimental parkinsonian rats. Brain Res 952(1):122–127View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moser KV, Reindl M, Blasig I, Humpel C (2004) Brain capillary endothelial cells proliferate in response to NGF, express NGF receptors and secrete NGF after inflammation. Brain Res 1017(1–2):53–60View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen TLX, Kim CK, Cho J-H, Lee K-H, Ahn J-Y (2010) Neuroprotection signaling pathway of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor against staurosporine induced apoptosis in hippocampal H19-7 cells. Exp Mol Med 42:583–595View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Driscoll CM, Gorman AM (2005) Hypoxia induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells that is mediated through adenosine A2A receptors. Neuroscience 131(2):321–329View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Satoh T, Yamagata T, Ishikawa Y, Yamada M, Uchiyama Y, Hatanaka H (1999) Regulation of reactive oxygen species by nerve growth factor but not Bcl-2 as a novel mechanism of protection of PC12 cells from superoxide anion-induced death. J Biochem 125(5):952–959View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Scheepens A, Wassink G, Blanco CE (2003) The effect of a global birth asphyxia on the ontogeny of BDNF and NGF protein expression in the juvenile brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 140(2):215–221View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith KG, Yates JM, Robinson PP (2004) The effect of nerve growth factor on functional recovery after injury to the chorda tympani and lingual nerves. Brain Res 1020(1–2):62–72View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tian L, Guo R, Yue X, Lv Q, Ye X, Wang Z, Chen Z, Wu B, Xu G, Liu X (2012) Intranasal administration of nerve growth factor ameliorate beta-amyloid deposition after traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res 1440:47–55View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Y, Liu GQ, Liu XD, Xiao XQ (1999) Efflux transport of [3H]GABA across blood-brain barrier after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats, Zhongguo yao li xue bao =. Acta Pharmacol Sin 20(3):223–226Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016