Open Access

Low expression levels of putative HPV encoded microRNAs in cervical samples

  • Elina Virtanen1,
  • Tuuli Pietilä1, 2, 4,
  • Pekka Nieminen3,
  • Kui Qian2, 5 and
  • Eeva Auvinen1Email author
SpringerPlus20165:1856

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3524-3

Received: 15 June 2016

Accepted: 12 October 2016

Published: 22 October 2016

Abstract

Using small RNA sequencing of libraries established from cervical samples and cervical cancer cell lines, we have previously reported identification of nine and validation of five putative microRNA species encoded by human papillomaviruses (HPV) including five microRNAs encoded by HPV 16. Here we have studied the expression of HPV 16 encoded microRNAs in cervical samples and in HPV 16 containing cell lines. Different sample matrices were collected for the study: 20 paraffin embedded cervical tissue samples, 16 liquid cytology samples, and 16 cervical cell samples from women attending colposcopy due to cervical abnormalities, as well as four HPV 16 containing cell lines. Total RNA was extracted, the samples were spiked with small synthetic control RNAs, and the expression of five HPV 16 encoded microRNAs was assessed by real-time PCR amplification. HPV encoded microRNAs could be frequently detected, albeit at high cycle counts. HPV16-miR-H1 was detected in 3.6 %, HPV16-miR-H3 in 23.6 %, HPV16-miR-H5 in 7.3 %, and HPV16-miR-H6 in 18.2 % of all valid samples. True positive signals for HPV16-miR-H2 could not be detected in any of the samples. Viral microRNAs were detected most frequently in paraffin-embedded samples: in one sample representing normal squamous epithelium, in one cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1, one CIN2, three CIN3, two squamous cell carcinoma, three adenocarcinoma in situ, and two adenocarcinoma samples. One liquid cytology sample from a patient with CIN3 as well as all four cell lines were positive for HPV16-miR-H3. In all cases HPV encoded microRNAs were expressed at low levels.

Keywords

FFPE SampleCervical SampleViral miRNAsmiRNA AssayHuman Foreskin Keratinocytes

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the established cause of cervical cancer, and they are implicated in other cancers in various anatomical sites of women and of men. In cervical cancer screening, as well as in triage and follow-up of cervical disease, high-risk (hr) HPV testing is gaining a firm foothold as an alternative to or in parallel with cytology. In addition to positive HPV DNA or mRNA findings, the use of cellular protein markers such as p16INK4a (von Knebel et al. 2012) or DNA methylation markers (Lorincz et al. 2016) have been suggested to improve the specificity of patient management.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding regulatory RNA molecules, which regulate the expression of numerous if not most human genes. Many viruses also encode their own miRNAs, and particularly DNA viruses replicating largely in the nucleus have been suggested to encode miRNAs. For example for BK, JC and Merkel polyomaviruses, miRNAs have proven significant in regulating host immune responses and in the establishment of persistent infection (Seo et al. 2008, 2009; Bauman et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2011). Viruses also modify human miRNA expression, and several studies including our own have reported modifications due to HPV (Melar-New and Laimins 2010; Greco et al. 2011; Zheng and Wang 2011), but whether HPV encodes miRNAs of its own has remained a controversial issue. Gu et al. reported a computer prediction of miRNAs encoded by cutaneous and mucosal HPVs (Gu et al. 2011). We have previously published identification and validation of putative HPV encoded miRNAs (Qian et al. 2013). Our work was based on sequencing of small RNA libraries established from human tissue samples representing HPV associated cervical disease, or from HPV containing cell lines. Bioinformatic tools were developed (Qian et al. 2012) and altogether nine HPV encoded miRNAs were predicted. Attempts were made to validate five of these, and four HPV encoded miRNAs were successfully validated: two encoded by HPV 16, one by HPV 38, and one by HPV 68. Among the original RNA sequencing results the HPV16-miR-H1 microRNA had only a few read counts in RNA sequencing while HPV16-miR-H2 read counts were rather high, and both of these were validated by looped-primer RT-PCR and in situ hybridization, suggesting that sequencing read counts cannot be taken as a direct measure of microRNA expression (Qian et al. 2013).

In order to study and validate the expression of all five putative HPV 16 encoded microRNAs, we subjected a set of clinical samples representing HPV associated cervical disease as well as HPV 16 containing cell lines to real-time PCR analysis for viral miRNAs. In this work an LNA enhanced primer based assay was used because the design paradigms of the looped-primer RT-PCR assay used in our previous study (Qian et al. 2013) were not compatible with some of the putative miRNA sequences. The expression of HPV 16 encoded microRNA was fairly common among our sample material, and HPV miRNAs were frequently detected in paraffin-embedded samples and in cell lines. Based on high PCR cycle counts we conclude that the expression levels were altogether low. Although human miRNAs are robustly regulated and may be of use in the diagnosis and monitoring of HPV positive patients, the low expression levels of HPV encoded miRNAs suggest that they are not suitable biomarkers for patient management. However, the frequent detection of HPV encoded miRNAs in HPV positive tissue and in cell lines suggests that viral microRNA may play a role in the regulation of viral replication and pathogenesis.

Methods

Samples

Because no established sample type or experimental procedures exist, we attempted microRNA detection from different sample matrices collected for other HPV studies, including formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archived samples (FFPE) similar to our previous study (Qian et al. 2013). Altogether 52 cervical samples were collected for the study. Twelve cervical samples were collected in Aptima sampling medium (Hologic, Marlborough, MA). Four samples were collected in Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) specimen transport medium (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD). Sixteen samples were liquid-based cytological samples collected in ThinPrep medium (Hologic). Twenty FFPE samples representing different grades of HPV associated lesions were collected from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital Laboratory, and they had all been used in our previous validation study except for sample N:o 39 (Qian et al. 2013). Aptima samples had been stored at −20 °C for ca 12 months, HC2 samples for 2 months, and ThinPrep samples for 2 months. RNA preparations of FFPE samples originated from a previous study and had been stored at −70 °C for ca 2 years. The use of cervical patient samples was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District.

Four HPV 16 containing cell lines were included in the study as well. HPK IA and HPK II cells were established and provided by Dr. Matthias Dürst (German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; present address: University Clinic Jena, Germany) (Dürst et al. 1987). The cells were established by transfection of primary human foreskin keratinocytes with HPV 16. CaSki epidermoid cervical carcinoma cells and SiHa human cervical tumor cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). All cells were cultured in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C and 5 % CO2 in a humidified incubator.

HPV detection and genotyping in clinical samples

All clinical samples were originally collected for other HPV studies, and HPV detection and/or genotyping was performed with the methods used in those studies. These included the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) liquid hybridization assay (Qiagen; Virtanen et al. 2016), the Aptima HPV assay (Hologic; Virtanen et al. 2016), the LDR-PCR microarray genotyping assay developed in our laboratory (Qian et al. 2013; Ritari et al. 2012), GeneXpert HPV (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) and the Luminex genotyping assay (Multimetrix/Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany). Of these, the LDR-PCR assay has the highest analytical sensitivity.

RNA extraction

Aliquots of clinical samples were processed as follows: 600-μl aliquots of Aptima samples, 300-μl aliquots of HC2 samples and 4-ml aliquots of ThinPrep samples were extracted using the miRCURY RNA Isolation Kit—Cell and Plant (Exiqon A/S, Vedbaek, Denmark) applying the preparation protocol for nasal or throat swabs. For HC2 and ThinPrep samples the cells were first centrifuged down (5 min 12,000g for HC2 and 15 min 2900g for ThinPrep), after which the supernatant was removed and 600 μl of lysis solution was added. After 5 min incubation at room temperature, 600 μl of 70 % ethanol was added and the extraction was carried out according to the manufacturer’s purification protocol for total RNA. 600 μl of 70 % ethanol was added directly to Aptima sample aliquots without adding lysis solution. Total RNA was eluted in 50 μl of elution buffer and stored at −70 °C until reverse transcription was performed. From each FFPE sample four 20-μm sections were prepared and RNA was isolated using the RecoverAll total RNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Total RNA from cultured cells was isolated using the mirVana RNA isolation kit (Ambion). RNA concentrations were measured in NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE).

MicroRNA real-time PCR assays

Array-format microRNA real-time PCR (rtPCR) miRNA assays were tailored according to the manufacturer’s design parameters (Exiqon) for HPV16-miR-H1, -H2, -H3, -H5 and -H6 (Table 1). Manufacturer-established assays were used for human endogenous RNU6B small nuclear RNA and spiked UniSp6 small RNA (Exiqon). The miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA PCR assays were run according to the instructions by the manufacturer (Exiqon). The reverse transcription (RT) reactions contained initially 10 ng of extracted RNA, 2 μl of 5× reaction buffer (including universal RT primer), 1 μl of enzyme mix, 0.5 μl of UniSp6 RNA spike-in template (75 amol) and water in a total volume of 10 μl. Later, in an attempt to increase the detection rate, a maximal volume (6.5 μl) of extracted RNA was used representing a range of 15–300 ng total RNA in a RT reaction. According to assay protocol, UniSp6 small RNA was added in the RT reaction, providing the samples with an internal control to confirm technical performance of the RT and rtPCR reactions. The RT reactions were incubated at 42 °C for 1 h followed by 95 °C for 5 min, and the resulting complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were stored at −70 °C unless rtPCR was performed the same day. For rtPCR reactions the cDNAs were diluted 1:100 in nuclease-free water. The diluted template was combined 1:1 with 2× ExiLENT SYBR Green master mix, and 10 μl of this reaction mix was added to each well. All rtPCR reactions were carried out in triplicates. All assays were run using the ABI 7500 real-time PCR instrument with 96-well format. In rtPCR, initial 10 min denaturation at 95 °C was followed by 40 amplification cycles (first seven Aptima samples) of 10 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C. For all other samples the number of cycles was raised to 60 in order to improve sensitivity. The assays were designed such that all miRNA assays from any individual sample were performed in one run in order to avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Non-template controls remained negative for all miRNA assays.
Table 1

HPV 16 encoded miRNA candidates [modified from Qian et al. (2013)]

miRNA name

Reference genome

Location

Annotation

Strand

Mature sequence

HPV16-miR-H1

NC_001526.2

2635–2716

E1

+

AGUGUAUGAGCUUAAUGAUAA

HPV16-miR-H2

FJ610147.1

56-1/7906–7851

LCR

AUGUGUAACCCAAAACGGUUUG

HPV16-miR-H3

NC_001526.2

518–642

LCR

+

CAACUGAUCUCUACUGUUA

HPV16-miR-H5

NC_001526.2

2471–2556

E1

+

GUAAAGCAUAGACCAUUG

HPV16-miR-H6

NC_001526.2

6684–6584

L1

AUCAACAACAGUAACAAA

Target prediction for HPV16-miR-H6

HPV16-miR-H6 was a particularly interesting microRNA because it had by far the highest read counts in small RNA sequencing in our previous study (Qian et al. 2013). We therefore performed target prediction of H6 using the TargetScan Custom algorithm (Lewis et al. 2005) (Additional file 1: Table S1). The list of predicted target genes was screened by the DAVID 6.7 annotation tool (Dennis et al. 2003; da Huang et al. 2009) using default DAVID parameters for overrepresented biological themes (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Results

We studied the expression of HPV encoded microRNA in a set of 52 cervical samples and four HPV containing cell lines. The clinical samples included 12 Aptima samples, four HC2 samples, 16 ThinPrep samples and 20 FFPE samples. Altogether 47 samples were hrHPV positive, three were hrHPV negative, and the HPV status of one sample could not be defined due to lack of sample material. One hrHPV positive Aptima sample was interpreted as invalid in the miRNA assays and was thus omitted from the analysis, resulting in 51 analysed clinical samples and four cell lines. All valid samples and their HPV status are described in Table 2. Histology, when available, is given for the actual sample (FFPE samples), or for a biopsy taken at the time of HPV sampling (Aptima, HC2, ThinPrep).
Table 2

Clinical samples and cell lines, HPV test results, histology at time of sampling, and microRNA assay results

N:o

Sample type

HC2

Aptima

LDR

Luminex

GeneXpert

Histology

H1

H2

H3

H5

H6

RNU6B

UniSp6

1a

Aptima

+

16

   

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

32

21

2a

Aptima

+

16

   

CIN3

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

33

21

3a

Aptima

+

16

   

CIN1

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

30

21

4a

Aptima

+

16

   

VAIN2

38 (1)

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

31

22

5a

Aptima

+

16

   

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

31

22

6a

Aptima

+

16

   

CIN1

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

34

22

7a

Aptima

+

16

   

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

32

21

8

Aptima

+

16

   

Carcinoma

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

32

22

9

Aptima

   

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

30

22

10

Aptima

+

16

   

CIN1

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

32

22

11

Aptima

   

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

28

21

12

HC2

+

    

N/A

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

51 (1)

24

21

13

HC2

+

    

Metaplasia

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

29

22

14

HC2

+

    

N/A

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

49 (1)

26

22

15

HC2

+

    

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

31

22

16

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

CIN2

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

57 (2, var)

30

22

17

ThinPrep

+

   

16

CIN3

Neg

Neg

44

50 (2, var)

48 (2, var)

24

22

18

ThinPrep

+

   

18/45

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

52 (1)

Neg

28

22

19

ThinPrep

+

   

18/45

AIS

Neg

39 (1)

58 (1)

Neg

51 (1)

28

21

20

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

CIN3

Neg

Neg

49 (2, var)

54 (1)

44 (2, var)

25

22

21

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

Metaplasia

50 (1)

Neg

50 (3, var)

56 (1)

42 (3, var)

24

22

22

ThinPrep

+

   

16

CIN1

Neg

Neg

45 (1)

Neg

53 (1)

28

22

23

ThinPrep

+

   

16, hrHPVb

CIN1

Neg

Neg

58 (2, var)

Neg

52 (2, var)

27

22

24

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

CIN2

Neg

39 (1)

Neg

Neg

Neg

33

23

25

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

CIN1

Neg

Neg

50 (3, var)

Neg

48 (3, var)

27

22

26

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

Condyloma

Neg

39 (1)

Neg

49 (1)

56 (1)

32

22

27

ThinPrep

+

   

16

CIN2

Neg

Neg

47 (3, var)

Neg

45 (3, var)

24

22

28

ThinPrep

+

   

18/45

Normal

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

31

23

29

ThinPrep

+

   

hrHPV

CIN1

Neg

37 (1)

55 (1)

Neg

57 (1)

29

23

30

ThinPrep

+

   

16

CIN3

50 (1)

39 (1)

45 (3, var)

48 (1)

45 (3, var)

25

22

31

ThinPrep

+

   

16

CIN2

Neg

Neg

50 (2, var)

Neg

47 (2, var)

27

22

32

FFPE

+

 

16, 18

16

 

SCC

Negc

Neg

45 (2, var)

54 (1)

48 (3, var)

31

22

33

FFPE

 

6, 16

  

CIN3

52 (1)c

Negc

47 (3, var)

48 (2, var)

39 (3, var)

33

22

34

FFPE

+

 

16, 18

16

 

AIS

42 (1)c

Negc

46 (3, var)

51 (2, var)

44 (3, var)

33

21

35

FFPE

 

16, 18

16

 

CIN3

55 (1)c

57 (2, var)c

45 (3, var)

42

41 (3, var)

31

22

36

FFPE

+

 

16

  

Adenocarcinoma

Negc

Negc

44 (3, var)

47 (2, var)

42 (3, var)

32 (2)

21

37

FFPE

+

 

16, 18

16

 

SCC

57 (1)c

Negc

46 (3, var)

47 (2, var)

41

33

21

38

FFPE

 

16

16, 31, 35

 

CIN3

56 (1)c

40 (1)

47 (3, var)

47 (3, var)

40 (3, var)

33

22

39

FFPE

N/A

    

Adenocarcinoma

Neg

Neg

44 (3, var)

45 (1)

46 (3, var)

33 (2)

22

40

FFPE

+

 

16, 18, 33

  

CIN3

Negc

Neg

44 (3, var)

60 (1)

46 (3, var)

29

22

41

FFPE

 

16

45

 

AIS

48 (1)c

Neg

41 (3, var)

44 (2, var)

41 (3, var)

31

22

42

FFPE

+

 

16, 58

16, 33, 58

 

CIN1

Negc

53 (1)

46 (3, var)

58 (1)

45 (3, var)

29

22

43

FFPE

 

16, 58

16, 18, 58

 

AIS

50 (1)c

Neg

56 (3, var)

Neg

58 (1)

34

23

44

FFPE

+

 

16, 18

33, 58

 

CIN1

Neg

44 (1)

45 (3, var)

52 (1)

45 (3, var)

33

22

45

FFPE

+

 

16, 18

16

 

AIS

Negc

Negc

56 (2, var)

Neg

53 (3, var)

38 (3, var)

24

46

FFPE

 

16

16

 

CIN2, p16+

55 (1)c

Neg

57 (2)

Neg

50 (3, var)

37 (2)

22

47

FFPE

+

 

16, 52

16, 35, 52, 56

 

CIN2, p16+

Negc

Neg

45 (3, var)

Neg

47 (3, var)

32

22

48

FFPE

 

 

CIN2, p16+

52 (1)

Neg

59 (1)

Neg

50 (3, var)

37 (2)

25

49

FFPE

 

16, 18

16

 

Normal EE

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

Neg

37

22

50

FFPE

+

 

16

16

 

SCC

Negc

Negc

43 (1)

42 (1)

46 (3, var)

28

27

51b,c

FFPE

 

16

 

Normal SE

Neg

Neg

44 (3, var)

53 (2, var)

40 (3, var)

31

22

52

HPK IA

     

N/A

39

58 (1)

38

37

34

20

22

53

HPK II

     

N/A

43 (3, var)

Neg

38 (3, var)

39 (3, var)

34

26

21

54

CaSki

     

N/A

42 (3, var)

Neg

40

46 (3, var)

34 (3, var)

25

22

55

SiHa

     

N/A

49 (3, var)

Neg

39 (3, var)

48 (3, var)

39 (3, var)

28

21

HC2 hybrid capture 2, LDR ligase detection reaction (LDR-PCR microarray), H1H6 HPV miRNAs, CIN1-3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1–3, VAIN vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, AIS adenocarcinoma in situ, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, EE endocervical epithelium, SE squamous epithelium. N/A not applicable or not available. Numbers in parentheses tell the number of replicates giving signal; var, multiple signals were not obtained within one cycle. Italicised values are interpreted as true positive findings

aAmplification of 40 cycles was performed; for all other samples 60 cycles of amplification was used

bPositive both for HPV 16 and another high-risk HPV type(s)

cExpression was seen in some replicates in previous work

Human endogenous RNU6B small nuclear RNA and spiked UniSp6 were used as internal controls. RNU6B was amplified at cycles varying from Ct 20 to Ct 38. In five samples where RNU6B was amplified at high cycles, variation between the replicates was more than one cycle (Table 2). RNU6B was also amplified from all cell lines because they are of human origin. Of note, the input RNA amount was highly variable among the samples, which explains the variable Ct cycles of RNU6B amplification. UniSp6 spiked control was relatively uniformly amplified at cycles 21–27, mostly at Ct 21–22. Amplification of internal controls was unsuccessful from one hrHPV positive Aptima sample, which was thus interpreted as invalid and was omitted.

We have previously identified five putative HPV 16 encoded microRNAs (Qian et al. 2013), which are described in Table 1. HPV16-miR-H1 and HPV16-miR-H5 map to the positive strand within the E1 ORF, HPV16-miR-H2 and HPV16-miR-H3 to opposite strands of the LCR regulatory region, and HPV16-miR-H6 to the negative strand of the L1 ORF. In order to study the expression of putative HPV 16 encoded miRNAs, tailored LNA enhanced primer based assays were used because the assay design paradigms of looped-primer RT-PCR used in our previous study were not compatible with some candidate miRNA sequences. It is important to note that the assays were designed in the present work for the first time, and thus no comparison data from other studies are available. In the assay design we aimed at having similar parameters including Tm for all assays, and the assays were designed for mature miRNA sequences. In our material of clinical samples and cell lines, HPV 16 encoded miRNAs were amplified at high cycle counts (Table 2). Because low expression levels brought about large variation between replicates in some cases, the results were interpreted as follows: If three or two replicates gave signals within one amplification cycle, the sample was considered true positive for that particular miRNA (Table 2, italicised values). If signals from three or two replicates were obtained but they varied more than one cycle, or if a signal was obtained only from one replicate, the sample was not considered true positive, however the number of replicates giving a signal is given in Table 2.

HPV16-miR-H1 was detected in HPK IA and CaSki cells (3.6 % of all samples). None of the samples were interpreted true positive for HPV16-miR-H2, although positive signals were obtained from sporadic replicates. HPV16-miR-H3 was detected in one liquid cytology sample from a CIN3 patient, in eight paraffin samples (one normal squamous epithelium, one CIN2, two CIN3, two adenocarcinoma in situ, two adenocarcinoma samples), and in all four cell lines (23.6 %). HPV16-miR-H5 was detected in two CIN3 samples and in the HPK IA and HPK II cells (7.3 %). Expression of HPV16-miR-H6 was validated in one CIN1, two CIN3, two SCC and one AIS case, and in all four cell lines (18.2 %). All samples where miRNA expression was found were shown to be HPV 16 positive (Table 2), and the cell lines are known to contain HPV 16. HPV encoded miRNAs were not detected in any of the samples which remained negative in hrHPV detection and genotyping assays. Because of the rather small study size and the small number of samples per category, the expression levels were not normalized to RNU6B or UniSp6.

Discussion

An important function of viral microRNAs is to modify viral gene expression, the cellular environment of virus replication, and the pathogenesis of viral diseases. Among human DNA tumor viruses at least the BK, JC and Merkel polyomaviruses encode miRNAs, which negatively regulate viral early gene expression with consequent escape from host immune attack and facilitation of viral replication (Seo et al. 2008, 2009; Lee et al. 2011). Papillomaviruses and polyomaviruses are both double-stranded DNA viruses causing persistent or latent infections and they share functional and molecular similarities, thus it is credible that papillomaviruses encode miRNAs of their own. Among the scarce scientific literature on the topic, detection of miRNAs encoded by human papillomaviruses has been unsuccessful by standard sequencing (Cai et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2014) or next generation sequencing (Lui et al. 2007). Computer predictions suggested, however, the existence of putative miRNA sequences encoded by mucosal and cutaneous HPV types (Gu et al. 2011). Our own studies have identified several putative HPV encoded microRNAs by SOLiD sequencing of small RNA libraries established from both human tissue samples and from HPV containing cell lines (Qian et al. 2013).

In the present work we report that expression of HPV encoded microRNAs in human cervical tissue or cell samples or in HPV containing cell lines is not infrequent, but amplification at high cycles suggests low expression levels of viral miRNAs. Viral miRNAs were found altogether in two normal/CIN1 cases and in eleven samples with severe histology (CIN2—carcinoma), suggesting that miRNA expression is found more often in high-grade lesions. Among human samples, the highest rate of miRNA signal was found in paraffin-embedded samples, confirming proper targeting of the HPV associated lesion by biopsy, and suggesting that the RNA extraction protocol used for these samples was successful. It also shows that microRNA can be successfully extracted and amplified from archival samples. Among other patient sample types, the only true HPV miRNA finding was HPV16-miR-H3 in a ThinPrep sample from a CIN3 patient. The amount of cells is much lower in cervical scrapings than in FFPE biopsy samples, which may explain poor detection of miRNAs, although RNU6B endogenous control was amplified at similar cycles from all sample types. Low detection rates may also be due to suboptimal extraction procedures for miRNA assay. Further, all HPV 16 harboring cell lines were found to express HPV microRNAs. Small RNAs used as controls were rigorously amplified at expected cycles, confirming the quality of the samples and the technical performance of the assay platform. Most of the FFPE samples were used in our previous validation study and were found positive for HPV16-miR-H1 or HPV16-miR-H2 by the looped-primer RT-PCR assay (Qian et al. 2013), but were not found positive using the LNA enhanced primer based assay in the present study. In the present work an LNA enhanced primer based assay was used because the design paradigms of the looped-primer RT-PCR assay were not compatible with some HPV miRNA sequences such as HPV16-miR-H6. Also, RNU6B was amplified at much higher cycles in the present study than in our previous work, suggesting differences in assay performance. According to the assay manufacturer, the LNA enhanced primer based assays used in the present work are more specific and, as suggested by our results, less sensitive than the looped-primer assays used in our previous work where identification of HPV microRNAs was presented (Qian et al. 2013). However, in our previous report, both TaqMan qPCR and in situ hybridization were successfully used to validate HPV16-miR-H1 and HPV16-miR-H2 expression. Different methods to study miRNA expression may typically produce different results, which are not always quantitatively comparable, and this complicates the evaluation of miRNA applicability for biomarker use. In our previous study, 100-fold differences in SOLiD small RNA sequencing data could not be reproduced in qPCR assays (Qian et al. 2013), suggesting that sequencing read counts cannot be used as a quantitative measure of miRNA expression. We further want to point out that the microRNA rtPCR assays designed for the present work have never been used before and therefore suboptimal assay design cannot be fully excluded.

Positive signals were most frequently obtained for HPV16-miR-H3, which maps to the positive strand within the LCR, and for HPV16-miR-H6 which maps to the negative strand of L1. In our previous miRNA sequencing study, the highest read counts by far were obtained for HPV16-miR-H6. Even low viral microRNA levels, however, may be sufficient to regulate viral replication and the expression of cellular target genes and thus have a role in the pathogenesis of viral diseases. Indeed, HPV16-miR-H2 has one predicted target sequence in the viral genome within the long control region upstream from replication origin in the HPV 16 genome (Qian et al. 2013).

Interestingly, all HPV 16 containing cell lines were found to express several HPV microRNAs, and they all expressed HPV16-miR-H3 and HPV16-miR-H6. The CaSki and SiHa cell lines have been established from cervical carcinoma tumors, whereas HPK IA and HPK II cell lines were originally established by transfecting HPV 16 DNA into foreskin primary keratinocytes (Dürst et al. 1987). The immortalized HPK cell lines are known to contain a number of chromosomal aberrations (Backsch et al. 2011). They represent clonal cell lines and thus every cell contains HPV 16, whereas in clinical samples HPV may be present in only a small proportion of cells. In our previous work, RNA sequencing produced 100-fold read counts for HPV16-miR-H6 as compared to other viral miRNAs. Target prediction for HPV16-miR-H6 yielded altogether 459 putative target genes (Additional file 1: Table S1), and functional annotation of the target genes revealed that most enriched biological process functions were cell adhesion and cell junction (Additional File 2: Table S2). Similar overrepresented functions were found among the predicted targets of human miRNAs which were differentially expressed due to HPV 16 E5 expression in our previous paper (Greco et al. 2011). Other potential functions among the targets were nuclear lumen, DNA binding, and calcium ion binding.

We conclude that the expression of human papillomavirus 16 encoded microRNAs was not infrequent but the expression levels were low in human cervical tissue and cell samples as well as in HPV 16 containing cell lines. Altogether microRNAs may have potential in the diagnosis, triage and follow-up of cervical disease, but cellular miRNAs regulated in HPV associated cervical disease hold more promise than viral miRNAs. However, frequent detection of viral miRNA, albeit at low levels, particularly in cell lines suggests that they may regulate viral replication and the expression of cellular target genes and thus have a role in the pathogenesis of viral diseases.

Conclusions

Human papillomavirus 16 encoded microRNAs can be detected in cervical swabs, paraffin embedded tissue samples and in HPV containing cell lines. Because of low expression levels HPV encoded miRNAs are not well suited for biomarkers, but they may play a role in virus replication and in the pathogenesis of HPV associated diseases.

Abbreviations

AIS: 

adenocarcinoma in situ

cDNA: 

complementary DNA

CIN: 

cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

FFPE: 

formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

HPV: 

human papillomavirus

hrHPV: 

high-risk human papillomavirus

miRNA: 

microRNA

qPCR: 

quantitative PCR

RT: 

reverse transcription

rtPCR: 

real-time PCR

SCC: 

squamous cell carcinoma

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

EV and EA designed the study, PN provided clinical samples, and EV and TP performed the experiments. MicroRNA target prediction and annotation was performed by KQ. The work was supervised by EA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Matthias Dürst for the HPK IA and HPK II cell lines, and Dr. Jussi Tarkkanen for providing clinical samples.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics, consent and permissions

The use of cervical patient samples was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District, and informed consent including consent to publish was obtained from all participants. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Funding

This study was funded by the Association against Sexually Transmitted Diseases (EV), the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, and by a Research and Development Grant of the Helsinki University Hospital Laboratory (EA).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Virology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
(2)
Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
(3)
Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
(4)
Blueprint Genetics, Helsinki, Finland
(5)
Shanghai Genebank Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China

References

  1. Backsch C, Pauly B, Liesenfeld M, Scheungraber C, Gajda M, Mrasek K, Liehr T, Clad A, Schrock E, Runnebaum IB, Dürst M (2011) Two novel unbalanced whole arm translocations are frequently detected in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet 204:646–653View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman Y, Nachmani D, Vitenshtein A, Tsukerman P, Drayman N, Stern-Ginossar N, Lankry D, Gruda R, Mandelboim O (2011) An identical miRNA of the human JC and BK polyoma viruses targets the stress-induced ligand ULBP3 to escape immune elimination. Cell Host Microbe 9:93–102View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai X, Li G, Laimins LA, Cullen BR (2006) Human papillomavirus genotype 31 does not express detectable microRNA levels during latent of productive virus replication. J Virol 80:10890–10893View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4:44–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, Lempicki RA (2003) DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol 4:P3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dürst M, Dzarlieva-Petrusevska RT, Boukamp P, Fusenig NE, Gissmann L (1987) Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of immortalized human primary keratinocytes obtained after transfection with human papillomavirus type 16 DNA. Oncogene 1:251–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Greco D, Kivi N, Qian K, Leivonen SK, Auvinen P, Auvinen E (2011) Human papillomavirus 16 E6 modulates the expression of host microRNAs. PLoS One 6(7):e21646. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021646 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu W, An J, Ye P, Zhao KN, Antonsson A (2011) Prediction of conserved microRNAs from skin and mucosal human papillomaviruses. Arch Virol 156:1161–1171View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee S, Paulson KG, Murchison EP, Afanasiev OK, Alkan C, Leonard JH, Byrd DR, Hannon GJ, Nghiem P (2011) Identification and validation of a novel mature microRNA encoded by the Merkel cell polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinomas. J Clin Virol 52:272–275View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120:15–20View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lorincz AT, Brentnall AR, Scibior-Bentkowska D, Reuter C, Banwait R, Cadman L, Austin J, Cuzick J, Vasiljević N (2016) Validation of a DNA methylation HPV triage classifier in a screening sample. Int J Cancer 138:2745–2751View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Lui WO, Pourmand N, Patterson BK, Fire A (2007) Patterns of known and novel small RNAs in human cervical cancer. Cancer Res 67:6031–6043View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Melar-New M, Laimins LA (2010) Human papillomaviruses modulate expression of microRNA 203 upon epithelial differentiation to control levels of p63 proteins. J Virol 84:5212–5221View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Qian K, Auvinen E, Greco D, Auvinen P (2012) miRSeqNovel: an R based workflow for analyzing miRNA sequencing data. Mol Cell Probes 26:208–211View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Qian K, Pietilä T, Rönty M, Michon F, Frilander MJ, Ritari J, Tarkkanen J, Paulín L, Auvinen P, Auvinen E (2013) Identification and validation of human papillomavirus encoded microRNAs. PLoS One 8(7):e70202. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070202 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ritari J, Hultman J, Fingerroos R, Tarkkanen J, Pullat J, Paulin L, Kivi N, Auvinen P, Auvinen E (2012) Detection of human papillomaviruses by polymerase chain reaction and ligation reaction on universal microarray. PLoS One 7(3):e34211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034211 ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Seo GJ, Fink LHL, O’Hara B, Atwood WJ, Sullivan CS (2008) Evolutionarily conserved function of a viral microRNA. J Virol 82:9823–9828View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Seo GJ, Chen CJ, Sullivan CS (2009) Merkel cell polyomavirus encodes a microRNA with the ability to autoregulate viral gene expression. Virology 383:183–187View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Virtanen E, Kalliala I, Dyba T, Nieminen P, Auvinen E (2016) Performance of mRNA and DNA based high-risk human papillomavirus assays in detection of high-grade cervical lesions. Acta Obstetr Gynecol Scand. doi:10.1111/aogs.13041 Google Scholar
  20. von Knebel Doeberitz M, Reuschenbach M, Schmidt D, Bergeron C (2012) Biomarkers for cervical cancer screening: the role of p16(INK4a) to highlight transforming HPV infections. Expert Rev Proteomics 9:149–163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang X, Wang HK, Li Y, Hafner M, Banerjee NS, Tang S, Briskin D, Meyers C, Chow LT, Xie X, Tuschl T, Zheng ZM (2014) microRNAs are biomarkers of oncogenic human papillomavirus infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:4262–4267ADSView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Zheng ZM, Wang X (2011) Regulation of cellular miRNA expression by human papillomaviruses. Biochim Biophys Acta 1809:668–677View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016