- Research
- Open Access

# Prediction of compressibility parameters of the soils using artificial neural network

- T. Fikret Kurnaz
^{1}Email author, - Ugur Dagdeviren
^{2}, - Murat Yildiz
^{3}and - Ozhan Ozkan
^{3}

**Received:**13 July 2016**Accepted:**7 October 2016**Published:**18 October 2016

## Abstract

The compression index and recompression index are one of the important compressibility parameters to determine the settlement calculation for fine-grained soil layers. These parameters can be determined by carrying out laboratory oedometer test on undisturbed samples; however, the test is quite time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, many empirical formulas based on regression analysis have been presented to estimate the compressibility parameters using soil index properties. In this paper, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is suggested for prediction of compressibility parameters from basic soil properties. For this purpose, the input parameters are selected as the natural water content, initial void ratio, liquid limit and plasticity index. In this model, two output parameters, including compression index and recompression index, are predicted in a combined network structure. As the result of the study, proposed ANN model is successful for the prediction of the compression index, however the predicted recompression index values are not satisfying compared to the compression index.

## Keywords

- Artificial neural network
- Compressibility
- Compression index
- Consolidation
- Recompression index

## Background

It is necessary to determine the compressibility parameters of soils such as the compression index (C_{c}) and the recompression index (C_{r}) for safe and economic design of civil engineering structures. In order to calculate the consolidation settlement of normally consolidated and over-consolidated saturated fine-grained soils, the compressibility parameters are determined by means of laboratory oedometer test on undisturbed samples based on Terzaghi’s consolidation theory. These parameters can be influenced from the quality of samples used in the tests. Although the compressibility parameters must be obtained from careful oedometer test measurements based on good quality undisturbed samples, conventional oedometer test comprises major disadvantages such as costliness, unwieldiness and time-consuming. In addition, the other important disadvantage of the estimation of the compressibility parameters is that the graphical method directly depends on the personal experience. Because of these factors, many researchers have been tried to develop practical and fast solutions.

The presence of relationships between the compressibility parameters and the basic soil properties has been investigated from past to present. Many different correlations based on multiple linear regression analysis have been proposed for determination of compression index (C_{c}) soil by researchers (Skempton 1944; Terzaghi and Peck 1967; Azzouz et al. 1976; Nagaraj and Srinivasa Murthy 1985; Lav and Ansal 2001; Yoon et al. 2004; Solanki et al. 2008; Dipova and Cangir 2010; Bae and Heo 2011; Akayuli and Ofosu 2013; Lee et al. 2015). These studies are generally focused on relationships between the compression index and physical properties of the soils such as the initial void ratio (e_{0}), natural water content (w_{n}), liquid limit (LL), and plasticity index (PI). Besides, the studies on the recompression index (C_{r}) seem to be quite limited (Nagaraj and Srinivasa Murthy 1985; Nakase et al. 1988; Isik 2009). The researches show that the physical parameters of soils have a significant effect on compressibility parameters of soil. In literature, the given regression equations to predict the compressibility parameters generally divided into two groups; connected with state variables such as void ratio and water content and connected with intrinsic variables such as liquid limit and plasticity index. It is known that the fully disturbed samples losing their memory involved with soil structure or stress history. Therefore, intrinsic properties are generally obtained by using fully disturbed samples. A number of previous researchers have reported that the compressibility of remolded clay has a specific relationship with the intrinsic variable of the clay (Lee et al. 2015). Due to the compression index of natural clay affected by the sedimentation case induced by deposition environments the evaluation using only intrinsic variables seems to be erroneous.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) have become a commonly used method due to give a more efficient and accurate results according to regression based statistical equations especially in terms of making estimates in nonlinear systems. Recently, ANNs have been successfully applied to many geotechnical engineering problems such as slope stability, liquefaction, settlement behavior, bearing capacity of shallow and deep foundations (Lee and Lee 1996; Sakellariou and Ferentinou 2005; Kim and Kim 2006; Kuo et al. 2009; Kalinli et al. 2011; Sulewska 2011; Chik et al. 2014). Due to the compression index (C_{c}) and the recompression index (C_{r}) are affected by multiple parameters, many researchers have been used the soft computing methods to determine these indexes in a much shorter time (Isik 2009; Park and Lee 2011; Kalantary and Kordnaeij 2012; Namdarvand et al. 2013; Demir 2015).

In this paper, an ANN application was performed to determine the compressibility parameters by using the index parameters of fine grained soils as a variable. Thus, it was aimed to get much better results compared to the obtained by the empirical formulas based on the regression analysis in the previous studies. On the other hand, most of the other studies related to predict the compressibility parameters (compression or recompression index) by using ANN models have checked carefully and it was seen that these studies preferred single output models despite using a number of different input parameters. In the presented study, both the compression index and the recompression index were tried to predict by using a two-output combined ANN model based on natural water content (w_{n}), initial void ratio (e_{0}), liquid limit (LL) and plasticity index (PI). Two or more output models provided time saving and reduced the workload and also successful results have been obtained by these models. A total of 246 laboratory oedometer and index tests results of fine-grained soils obtained by the various geotechnical investigations in Turkey were used in this work. The performance of the proposed ANN model was evaluated based on the correlation coefficient (R) and mean squared error (MSE).

## Consolidation settlement

The settlement of structures on the fine-grained soil stratums due to the vertical stress increment is one of the most important problems in geotechnical engineering. The total settlement of a structure comprises three parts: (1) immediate (elastic) compression, (2) primary consolidation, (3) secondary consolidation (creep). Elastic settlement occurs immediately due to applied load without any change in the water content. Primary consolidation is a main component of settlement of fine-grained saturated soils having low permeability, because the excess pore water pressure dissipates with time. The secondary consolidation is creep of soils such as peats and soft organic clays under constant effective stress. The primary and secondary consolidation settlements can be several times greater than the elastic settlement in saturated fine-grained soils.

_{c}) due to an increase in vertical stress (Δσ

_{v}) can be determined as;

_{c}is the compression index; H

_{0}, e

_{0}and \(\sigma_{{{\text{v}}0}}^{{\prime }}\) are initial thickness, initial void ratio and average vertical effective stress of the soil layer, respectively.

_{r}can be used in place of compression index C

_{c}in Eq. 1. When the final effective stress exceeds the preconsolidation stress, the settlement equation consists of two parts and both C

_{r}and C

_{c}must be used to calculate the consolidation settlement of over-consolidated soil as:

*e*−

*log σ*) plots in Fig. 1. The slope of the straight-line portion of the virgin part of the compression curve on a semi-logarithmic plot is the compression index (C

_{c}) and the slope of the recompression or swelling curve is the recompression index (C

_{r}) as shown in Fig. 1.

## Database compilation

Descriptive statistics of parameters

w | LL | PI | e | C | C | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Least | 16.3 | 26.3 | 9.0 | 0.460 | 0.070 | 0.011 |

Most | 72.0 | 99.6 | 77.8 | 1.888 | 0.833 | 0.164 |

Mean | 33.1 | 51.8 | 30.0 | 0.949 | 0.286 | 0.051 |

SD | 11.3 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 0.313 | 0.150 | 0.031 |

The database that can be used for the development of regression-based new equations and comparison of the performance of existing regression-based empirical equations, involves a wide range of data as seen on the Table 1. However, the database was only created to determine the compression index and the recompression index from physical parameters of fine grained soils by using ANN in this study.

_{c}and w

_{n}or e

_{0}in Fig. 2 have supported the idea.

## Artificial neural network (ANN)

The network is produced by the interconnection of the layers. There are three type of network in ANN. In feed-forward networks, the processor elements are decomposed into layers and flow of the information moves only one direction from the input layer to the output layer in these networks (Sagiroglu et al. 2003). In the ANNs connected in cascade, cells only receive information from the cells in the previous layer (MATLAB 2009). ANN with back propagation is widely used because of being useful and safe. The most important features of this type of ANN are being eligible for estimation, classification and to be useful in contains nonlinear structural models (Demuth et al. 2007). Also both feed forward and back propagation network structures can be described.

Basically learning methods in the ANN are divided into three groups. These are supervised learning which the training data is used for ANN’s training, unsupervised learning which is the set of weights of the connection of the mathematical relationship between the data without using any training kit and last one is reinforced learning which is a close method to supervised learning (Oz et al. 2002; MATLAB 2002). ANN model structure, network type and learning method used for the study are specified in the relevant section.

## Proposed artificial neural network model

In the ANN models, the available database is generally divided into three subsets: training, validation and testing sets. In this study, 70 % of the 246 samples (172 randomly selected data) for training, 15 % of the total data (37 randomly selected data) for validation and also 15 % of the database (37 randomly selected data) for testing were used to predict the compressibility parameters.

*C*

_{ i,m }and

*C*

_{ i,p }are the measured and predicted output values; \(\overline{C_{i,m}}\) and \(\overline{C_{i,p}}\) are the averages of the measured and predicted output values, respectively. n is the number of sample.

^{2}) for the compression index are 0.8926 and 0.8973 for training and testing stage, respectively. These results show that a quite close relationship between the measured values and the predicted values by ANN model. However, the coefficients of determination (R

^{2}) for the recompression index were calculated as 0.6071 and 0.3600 for training and testing, respectively. It is seen that the proposed ANN model obtained well correlation for the compression index compared with the recompression index.

## Discussions and conclusions

In this study, a neural network simulation practice has been made to predict the compression index and recompression index based on the geotechnical characteristics of different borehole data collected from Turkey. ANN is a powerful tool in predicting the consolidation parameters and more accurate results than the conventional methods are obtained. The previous studies based on this issue were generally focused on the predicting only compression index or recompression index by ANN. In this study, both the compression index and the recompression index are tried to predict on the combined ANN model structure. In the proposed ANN model, the input parameters are the soil properties such as the initial void ratio, the liquid limit, the natural water content and the plasticity index. The proposed model of the ANN results compared with the experimental values and the predicted compression index values were found close to the experimental values. However, the proposed ANN model did not show the same success for the recompression index data. This can be explained with the poor relationships between the recompression index and the physical properties in this study. The successful recompression index predictions with same input parameters should be difficult for the other data sets in similar ANN models. Nevertheless, the predicted compression index values using proposed ANN model are compatible with the measured compression index values as seen in this research.

## Declarations

### Authors’ contributions

TFK and UD were deal with the data collection and the theory of the issue. MY and OO were also performed the ANN model for the research topic. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Akayuli CFA, Ofosu B (2013) Empirical model for estimating compression index from physical properties of weathered birimian phyllites. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:6135–6144Google Scholar
- Azzouz AS, Krizek RJ, Corotis RB (1976) Regression analysis of soil compressibility. Soils Found 16(2):19–29View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bae W, Heo TY (2011) Prediction of compression index using regression analysis of transformed variables method. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 29(1):76–94View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chik Z, Aljanabi QA, Kasa A, Taha MR (2014) Tenfold cross validation artificial neural network modeling of the settlement behavior of a stone column under a highway embankment. Arab J Geosci 7(11):4877–4887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Demir A (2015) New computational network models for better predictions of the soil compression index. Acta Geotech Slov 12(1):59–69Google Scholar
- Demuth H, Beale M, Hagan M (2007) Neural network toolbox user’s guide for use with matlab. Mathworks Inc, NatickGoogle Scholar
- Dipova N, Cangir B (2010) Lagün kökenli kil-silt zeminde sıkışabilirlik özelliklerinin regresyon ve yapay sinir ağları yöntemleri ile belirlenmesi. İMO Teknik Dergi 21(3):5069–5086
**(in Turkish)**Google Scholar - Isik SN (2009) Estimation of swell index of fine grained soils using regression equations and artificial neural networks. Sci Res Essays 4(10):1047–1056Google Scholar
- Kalantary F, Kordnaeij A (2012) Prediction of compression index using artificial neural network. Sci Res Essays 7(31):2835–2848Google Scholar
- Kalinli A, Acar MC, Gunduz Z (2011) New approaches to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations based on artificial neural networks and ant colony optimization. Eng Geol 117(1–2):29–38View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim YS, Kim BT (2006) Use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1502–1504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuo YL, Jaksa MB, Lyamin AV, Kaggwa WS (2009) ANN-based model for predicting the bearing capacity of strip footing on multi-layered cohesive soil. Comput Geotech 36(3):503–516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lav MA, Ansal MA (2001) Regression analysis of soil compressibility. Turk J Environ Sci 25:101–109Google Scholar
- Lee I, Lee J (1996) Prediction of pile bearing capacity using artificial neural networks. Comput Geotech 18(3):189–200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee C, Hong SJ, Kim D, Lee W (2015) Assessment of compression index of Busan and Incheon clays with sedimentation state. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 33(1):23–32View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MATLAB® (2002) Documentation neural network toolbox help version 6.5, release 13. MathWorks Inc, NatickGoogle Scholar
- MATLAB® (2009) Documentation neural network toolbox help, Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, release 2009. MathWorks Inc, NatickGoogle Scholar
- Nagaraj TS, Srinivasa Murthy BR (1985) Prediction of the preconsolidation pressure and recompression index of soils. Geotech Test J 8(4):199–202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakase A, Kamei T, Kusakabe O (1988) Constitute parameters estimated by plasticity index. J Geotech Eng 114(7):844–858View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Namdarvand F, Jafarnejadi A, Sayyad G (2013) Estimation of soil compression coefficient using artificial neural network and multiple regressions. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 4(10):3232–3236Google Scholar
- Oz C, Köker R, Cakar S (2002) Yapay sinir ağları ile karakter tabanlı plaka tanıma. Elektrik-Elektronik-Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Sempozyumu (ELECO), Bursa (in Turkish) Google Scholar
- Oztemel E (2003) Yapay sinir ağları. Papatya Yayıncılık (in Turkish) Google Scholar
- Park HI, Lee SR (2011) Evaluation of the compression index of soils using an artificial neural network. Comput Geotech 38(4):472–481View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing vol 1, no 8. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sagiroglu S, Besdok E, Erler M (2003) Mühendislikte yapay zeka uygulamaları-I. Ufuk Kitap Kırtasiye Yayıncılık (in Turkish) Google Scholar
- Sakellariou MG, Ferentinou M (2005) A study of slope stability prediction using neural networks. Geotech Geol Eng 24(3):419–445View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skempton AW (1944) Notes on the compressibility of clays. Q J Geol Soc Lond 100(1–4):119–135View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solanki CH, Desai MD, Desai JA (2008) Statistical analysis of index and consolidation properties of alluvial deposits and new correlations. Int J Appl Eng Res 3(5):681–688Google Scholar
- Sulewska MJ (2011) Applying artificial neural networks for analysis of geotechnical problems. Comput Assist Mech Eng Sci 18:231–241Google Scholar
- Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Yoon GL, Kim BT, Jeon SS (2004) Empirical correlations of compression index for marine clay from regression analysis. Can Geotech J 41:1213–1221View ArticleGoogle Scholar