Open Access

Strong convergence theorems for a common zero of a finite family of H-accretive operators in Banach space

SpringerPlus20165:941

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2646-y

Received: 31 March 2016

Accepted: 22 June 2016

Published: 30 June 2016

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study a finite family of H-accretive operators and prove common zero point theorems of them in Banach space. The results presented in this paper extend and improve the corresponding results of Zegeye and Shahzad (Nonlinear Anal 66:1161–1169, 2007), Liu and He (J Math Anal Appl 385:466–476, 2012) and the related results.

Keywords

H-accretive operators Resolvent operator Iteration algorithms Strong convergence

Mathematics Subject Classification

47H06 47H10

Background

Let E be a real Banach space with norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) and Let \(E^*\) be its dual space. The value of \(x^*\in E^*\) at \(x\in E\) will be denoted by \(\langle x,x^*\rangle\).

The inclusion problem is finding a solution to
$$0\in T(x),$$
(1)
where T is a set-valued mapping and from E to \(2^E\).
It was first considered by Rockafellar (1976) by using the proximal point algorithm in a Hilbert space \({\mathscr {H}}\) in 1976. For any initial point \(x_0=x\in {\mathscr {H}}\), the proximal point algorithm generates a sequence \(\{x_n\}\) in \({\mathscr {H}}\) by the following algorithm
$$x_{n+1}=J_{r_n}x_n, \quad n=0,1,2,\ldots ,$$
(2)
where \(J_{r_n}=(I+r_nT)^{-1}\) and \(\{r_n\}\subset (0,\infty )\), T is maximal monotone operators.

From then on, the inclusion problem becomes a hot topic and it has been widely studied by many researchers in many ways. The mainly studies focus on the more general algorithms, the more general spaces or the weaker assumption conditions, such as Reich (1979, 1980), Benavides et al. (2003), Xu (2006), Kartsatos (1996), Kamimura and Takahashi (2000), Zhou et al. (2000), Maing (2006), Qin and Su (2007), Ceng et al. (2009), Chen et al. (2009), Song et al. (2010), Jung (2010), Fan et al. (2016) and so on. And their researches mainly contain the maximal monotone operators in Hilbert spaces and the m-accretive operators in Banach spaces.

Zegeye and Shahzad (2007) studied a finite family of m-accretive mappings and proposed the iterative sequence \(\{x_n\}\) is generated as follows:
$$x_{n+1}=\alpha _nu+(1-\alpha _n)S_rx_n$$
(3)
where \(S_r:=a_0I+a_1J_{A_1}+a_2J_{A_2}+\cdots +a_rJ_{A_r}\), with \(J_{A_i}:=(I+A_i)^{-1}\) for \(0<a_i<1\), \(i=1,2,\ldots ,r\), \(\sum _{i=0}^r a_i=1\).

And proved the sequence \(\{x_n\}\) converges strongly to a common solution of the common zero of the operators \(A_i\) for \(i=1,2,\ldots ,r\).

Recently, Fang and Huang (2003, 2004) respectively firstly introduced a new class of monotone operators and accretive operators called H-monotone operators and H-accretive operators, and they discussed some properties of this class of operators.

Definition 1

Let \(H:\mathscr {H}\rightarrow \mathscr {H}\) be a single-valued operator and \(T:\mathscr {H}\rightarrow 2^{\mathscr {H}}\) be a multivalued operator. T is said to be H-monotone if T is monotone and \((H+\lambda T)(\mathscr {H})=\mathscr {H}\) holds for every \(\lambda >0\).

Definition 2

Let \(H:E\rightarrow E\) be a single-valued operator and \(T:E\rightarrow 2^E\) be a multivalued operator. T is said to be H-accretive if T is accretive and \((H+\lambda T)E=E\) holds for all \(\lambda >0\).

Remark 1

The relations between H-accretive (monotone) operators and m-accretive (maximal monotone) operators are very close, for details, see Liu et al. (2013), Liu and He (2012).

From then, the study of the zero points of H-monotone operators in Hilbert space and H-accretive operators in Banach space have received much attention, see Peng (2008), Zou and Huang (2008, 2009), Ahmad and Usman (2009), Wang and Ding (2010), Li and Huang (2011), Tang and Wang (2014) and Huang and Noor (2007), Xia and Huang (2007), Peng and Zhu (2007). Especially, Very recently, Liu and He (2013, 2012) studied the strong and weak convergence for the zero points of H-monotone operators in Hilbert space and H-accretive operators in Banach space respectively.

Motivated mainly by Zegeye and Shahzad (2007) and Liu and He (2012), in this paper, we will study the zero points problem of a common zero of a finite family of H-accretive operators and establish some strong convergence theorems of them. These results extend and improve the corresponding results of Zegeye and Shahzad (2007) and Liu and He (2012).

Preliminaries

Throughout this paper, we adopt the following notation: Let \(\{x_n\}\) be a sequence and u be a point in a real Banach space with norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) and let \(E^*\) be its dual space. We use \(x_n\rightarrow x\) to denote strong and weak convergence to x of the sequence \(\{x_n\}\).

A real Banach space E is said to be uniformly convex if \(\delta (\varepsilon )>0\) for every \(\varepsilon >0\), where the modulus \(\delta (\varepsilon )\) of convexity of E is defined by
$$\delta (\varepsilon )=\inf \left\{ 1-\left\| \frac{x+y}{2}\right\| :\Vert x\Vert \le 1,\Vert y\Vert \le 1,\Vert x-y\Vert \ge \varepsilon \right\}$$
(4)
for every \(\varepsilon\) with \(0\le \varepsilon \le 2\). It is well known that if E is uniformly convex, then E is reflexive and strictly convex (Goebel and Reich 1984)
Let \(S\triangleq \{x\in E:\Vert x\Vert =1\}\) be the unit sphere of E, we consider the limit
$$\lim \limits _{t\rightarrow 0}\frac{\Vert x+th\Vert -\Vert x\Vert }{t}$$
(5)

The norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) of Banach space E is said to be Gâteaux differentiable if the limit (5) exists for each \(x,h\in S\). In this case, the Banach space E is said to be smooth.

The norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) of Banach space E is said to be uniformly Gâteaux differentiable if for each \(h \in S\) the limit (5) is attained uniformly for x in S.

The norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) of Banach space E is said to be Fréchet differentiable if for each \(x \in S\) the limit (5) is attained uniformly for h in S.

The norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert\) of Banach space E is said to be uniformly Fréchet differentiable if the limit (5) is attained uniformly for (xh) in \(S\times S\). In this case, the Banach space E is said to be uniformly smooth.

The dual space \(E^*\) of E is uniformly convex if and only if the norm of E is uniformly Fréchet differentiable, then every Banach space with a uniformly convex dual is reflexive and its norm is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable, the converse implication is false. Some related concepts can be found in Day (1993).

Let \(H{:}E\rightarrow E\) be a strongly accretive and Lipschtiz continuous operator with constant \(\gamma\). Let \(T{:}E\rightarrow 2^E\) be an H-accretive operator and the resolvent operator \(J_{H,\rho }^T{:}E\rightarrow E\) is defined by
$$J_{H,\rho }^T(u)=(H+\rho T)^{-1}(u) \quad \forall u\in E.$$
(6)
for each \(\rho >0\). We can define the following operators which are called Yosida approximation:
$$A_\rho =\frac{1}{\rho }\left(I-H\cdot J_{H,\rho }^T\right) \quad for\,all\,\rho >0.$$
(7)

Some elementary properties of \(J_{H,\rho }^T\) and \(A_\rho\) are given as some lemmas in the following in order to establish our convergence theorems.

Lemma 1

(see Xu 2003) Let \(\{a_n\}\) be a sequence of non-negative real numbers satisfying the following relation:
$$a_{n+1}\le (1-\gamma _n)a_n+\sigma _n,\quad n\ge 0,$$
(8)
where \(\{\gamma _n\}\subset (0,1)\) for each \(n\ge 0\) satisfy the conditions:
  1. (i)

    \(\sum _{n=1}^\infty \gamma _n=\infty\);

     
  2. (ii)

    \(\limsup \nolimits _{n\rightarrow \infty }\frac{\sigma _n}{\gamma _n}\le 0\) or \(\sum _{n=1}^\infty |\sigma _n|<\infty\);

     
Then \(\{a_n\}\) converges strongly to zero.

Lemma 2

(Reich 1980) Let E be a uniformly smooth Banach space and let \(T:C\rightarrow C\) be a nonexpansive mapping with a fixed point. For each fixed \(u\in C\) and \(t\in (0,1)\), the unique fixed point \(x_t\in C\) of the contraction \(C\ni x \mapsto tu+(1-t)Tx\) converges strongly as \(t\rightarrow 0\) to a fixed point of T. Define \(Q:C\rightarrow F(T)\) by \(Qu=s-\lim \nolimits _{t\rightarrow 0}x_t\). Then Q is the unique sunny nonexpansive retract from C onto F(T), that is, Q satisfies the property
$$\langle u-Qu,J(z-Qu)\rangle \le 0,\quad u\in C,z\in F(T).$$
(9)

Lemma 3

(Proposition 4.1 in Liu and He 2012) Let \(H: E\rightarrow E\) be a strongly accretive and Lipschtiz continuous operator with constant \(\gamma\) and \(T: E\rightarrow 2^E\) be a H-accretive operator. Then the following hold:
  1. (i)

    \(\Vert J_{H,\rho }^T(x)-J_{H,\rho }^T(y)\Vert \le 1/\gamma \Vert x-y\Vert \quad \forall x,y\in R(H+\rho T);\)

     
  2. (ii)

    \(\Vert H\cdot J_{H,\rho }^T(x)-H\cdot J_{H,\rho }^T(y)\Vert \le \Vert x-y\Vert \quad \forall x,y\in E,\) or \(\Vert J_{H,\rho }^T\cdot H(x)-J_{H,\rho }^T\cdot H(y)\Vert \le \Vert x-y\Vert \quad \forall x,y\in E;\)

     
  3. (iii)
    \(A_\rho\) is accretive and
    $$\Vert A_\rho x-A_\rho y\Vert \le \frac{2}{\rho }\Vert x-y\Vert \quad for\,all\,x,y\in R(H+\rho T);$$
     
  4. (iv)

    \(A_\rho x\in T J_{H,\rho }^T(x)\quad for\,all\,x\in R(H+\rho T).\)

     

Lemma 4

(Proposition 4.2 in Liu and He 2012) \(u\in T^{-1}0\) if and only if u satisfies the relation
$$u=J_{H,\rho }^T(H(u))$$
(10)
where \(\rho >0\) is a constant and \(J_{H,\rho }^T\) is the resolvent operator defined by (6).

Lemma 5

(see Petryshyn 1970) Let E be a real Banach space. Then for all \(x,y\in E\), \(\forall j(x+y)\in J(x+y)\),
$$\Vert x+y\Vert ^2\le \Vert x\Vert ^2+2\langle y,j(x+y)\rangle .$$
(11)

Main results

Proposition 1

Let E be a strictly convex Banach space, \(H{:}E \rightarrow E\) be a strongly accretive and Lipschtiz continuous operator with constants \(\gamma\). Let \(T_i{:}E\rightarrow 2^E,i=1,2,\ldots ,r\) be a family of H-accretive operators with \(\cap _{i=1}^rN(T_i)\ne \emptyset\). Let \(a_0,a_1,a_2,\ldots ,a_r\) be real numbers in (0, 1) such that \(\sum _{i=0}^r a_i=1\) and let \(S_r:=a_0I+a_1J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}H+a_2J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}H+\cdots +a_rJ_{H,\rho }^{T_r}H\), where \(J_{H,\rho }^T=(H+\rho T)^{-1}\). Then \(S_r\) is nonexpansive and \(F(S_r)=\cap _{i=1}^rN(T_i)\).

Proof

Since every \(T_i\) is H-accretive for \(i=1,2,\ldots ,r\), then \(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}H\) is well defined and it is a nonexpansive mapping from Lemma 4, and we can also get that \(F(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}H)=N(T_i)\).

Hence, it is easy to obtain that
$$\mathop \cap\limits_{{i = 1}}^{r} {N(T_{i} )} =\mathop \cap\limits_{{i = 1}}^{r} {F\left(J_{{H,\rho }}^{{T_{i} }} H\right) \subseteq F(S_{r} )}$$
and \(S_r\) is nonexpansive.

Next, we prove that \(F(S_r)\subseteq \cap _{i=1}^rF(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}H)\).

Let \(z\in F(S_r)\), \(w\in \cap _{i=1}^rF(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}H)\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} z-w &= a_0z+a_1J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz+a_2J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz+\cdots +a_rJ_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\nonumber \\&= a_0(z-w)+a_1(J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w)+a_2(J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz-w)+\cdots +a_r(J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w). \end{aligned}$$
(12)
The above equality can be also written as follows:
$$z-w=\frac{a_1}{\sum _{i=1}^r a_i}(J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w)+\cdots +\frac{a_r}{\sum _{i=1}^r a_i}(J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w)$$
so
$$\Vert z-w\Vert =\Vert \frac{a_1}{\sum _{i=1}^r a_i}(J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w)+\cdots +\frac{a_r}{\sum _{i=1}^r a_i}(J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w)\Vert$$
(13)
From (12), we also have
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert z-w\Vert &= \Vert a_0(z-w)+a_1(J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w)+a_2(J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz-w)+\cdots +a_r(J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w)\Vert \nonumber \\&\le a_0\Vert z-w\Vert +a_1\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w\Vert +a_2\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz-w\Vert +\cdots +a_r\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\Vert \nonumber \\&\le \sum _{i=0}^{r}a_i\Vert z-w\Vert \nonumber \\&= \Vert z-w\Vert . \end{aligned}$$
(14)
From (14), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert z-w\Vert &= \sum _{i=0}^{r}a_i\Vert z-w\Vert \\&= \sum _{i=0}^{r-1}a_i\Vert z-w\Vert +a_r\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\Vert \\&= (1-a_r)\Vert z-w\Vert +a_r\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\Vert . \end{aligned}$$
Hence,
$$\Vert z-w\Vert =\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\Vert .$$
Similarly, we can get
$$\Vert z-w\Vert =\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w\Vert =\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz-w\Vert =\cdots =\Vert J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w\Vert .$$
(15)
From the strict convexity of E, (13) and (15), we know that
$$z-w=J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}Hz-w=J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}Hz-w=\cdots =J_{H,\rho }^{T_r}Hz-w.$$
Therefore,
$$J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}Hz=z, \quad for\ \ i=1,2,\ldots ,r.$$
Namely,
$$z\in \mathop\cap\limits _{i=1}^rF(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}H)$$

The proof is completed. \(\square\)

Theorem 1

Let E be a strictly convex and real uniformly smooth Banach space which has a uniformly G \(\hat{a}\) teaux differentiable norm, \(H{:}E \rightarrow E\) be a strongly accretive and Lipschtiz continuous operator with constants \(\gamma\). Let \(T_i{:}E\rightarrow 2^E,i=1,2,\ldots ,r\) be a family of H-accretive operators with \(\cap _{i=1}^rN(T_i)\ne \emptyset\), For given \(u,x_0\in E\), let \(\{x_n\}\) be generated by the algorithm
$$x_{n+1}=\alpha _n u+(1-\alpha _n)S_rx_n,\quad n\ge 0.$$
(16)
where \(S_r:=a_0I+a_1J_{H,\rho }^{T_1}H+a_2J_{H,\rho }^{T_2}H+\cdots +a_rJ_{H,\rho }^{T_r}H\), with \(J_{H,\rho }^{T_i}=(H+\rho {T_i})^{-1}\) for \(0<a_i<1,\,i=1,2,\ldots ,r,\,\sum _{i=0}^r a_i=1\), where \(\forall \rho \in (0,\infty )\) and \(\{\alpha _n\}\subset [0,1]\) satisfy the following conditions:
  1. (i)

    \(\lim \nolimits _{n\rightarrow \infty }\alpha _n=0\),

     
  2. (ii)

    \(\sum _{n=0}^\infty \alpha _n=\infty\),

     
  3. (iii)

    \(\sum _{n=0}^\infty |\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1}|<\infty\) or \(\lim \nolimits _{n\rightarrow \infty }\frac{|\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1}|}{\alpha _n}=0\),

     
Then \(\{x_n\}\) converges strongly to a common solution of the equations \(T_ix=0\) for \(i=1,2,\ldots ,r\).

Proof

First, we show that \(\{x_n\}\) is bounded.

By the Proposition 1, we have that \(F(S_r)=\cap _{i=1}^rN(T_i)\ne \emptyset\). Then, take a point \(x^*\in F(S_r)\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert x_{n+1}-x^*\Vert &\le \Vert \alpha _n (u-x^*)+(1-\alpha _n)(S_rx_n-x^*)\Vert \\&\le \alpha _n \Vert u-x^*\Vert +(1-\alpha _n)\Vert x_n-x^*\Vert . \end{aligned}$$
By induction we obtain that
$$\Vert x_{n}-x^*\Vert \le \max \{\Vert u-x^*\Vert ,\Vert x_0-x^*\Vert \}, \quad for \, n=0,1,2\ldots$$
Hence, \(\{x_n\}\) is bounded, and so is \(\{S_rx_n\}\).

Second, we will show that \(\Vert x_{n+1}-x_n\Vert \rightarrow 0\).

From (16) we can get that
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert x_{n+1}-x_n\Vert &= \Vert \alpha _n u+(1-\alpha _n)S_rx_n-\alpha _{n-1} u-(1-\alpha _{n-1})S_rx_{n-1}\Vert \\&= \Vert (\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1})u+ (1-\alpha _n)S_rx_n-(1-\alpha _{n-1})S_rx_{n-1}\Vert \\ &= \Vert (\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1})u+ (1-\alpha _n)S_rx_n-(1-\alpha _n)S_rx_{n-1}\\&\quad +\, (1-\alpha _n)S_rx_{n-1}-(1-\alpha _{n-1})S_rx_{n-1}\Vert \\ &= \Vert (\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1})(u-S_rx_{n-1})+ (1-\alpha _n)(S_rx_n-S_rx_{n-1})\Vert \\&\le (1-\alpha _n)\Vert S_rx_n-S_rx_{n-1}\Vert +|\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1}|\Vert u-S_rx_{n-1}\Vert \\&\le (1-\alpha _n)\Vert x_n-x_{n-1}\Vert +|\alpha _n-\alpha _{n-1}|M \end{aligned}$$
where \(M=\sup \{\Vert u-S_rx_{n-1}\Vert ,\, n=0,1,2\ldots \}\) for \(\{S_rx_n\}\) is bounded. By applying the Lemma 1 and condition (iii), we assert that
$$\Vert x_{n+1}-x_n\Vert \rightarrow 0,$$
as \(n\rightarrow \infty\).
Then, we have
$$\Vert x_n-S_rx_n\Vert \le \Vert x_n-x_{n+1}\Vert +\Vert x_{n+1}-S_rx_n\Vert ,$$
and so that
$$\Vert x_n-S_rx_n\Vert \rightarrow 0,$$
(17)
as \(n\rightarrow \infty\).
Based on the Lemma 2, there exists the sunny nonexpansive retract Q from E onto the common zeros point set of \(T_i\) (\(\cap _{i=1}^rN(T_i), \,i=1,2,\ldots r\)) and it is unique, that is to say for \(t\in (0,1)\),
$$Qu=s-\lim \limits _{t\rightarrow 0}z_t, \quad u\in E,$$
and \(z_t\) satisfies the following equation
$$z_t=tu+(1-t)S_rz_t,$$
where \(u\in E\) is arbitrarily taken for all \(r>0\).
Applying the Lemma 5, we obtain that
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert z_t-x_n\Vert ^2 &= \Vert t(u-x_n)+(1-t)(S_rz_t-x_n)\Vert ^2\\&\le (1-t)^2\Vert S_rz_t-x_n\Vert ^2+2t\langle u-x_n,j(z_t-x_n)\rangle \\&\le (1-t)^2(\Vert S_rz_t-S_rx_n\Vert +\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert )^2+2t(\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert ^2\langle u-x_n,j(z_t-x_n)\rangle )\\&\le (1+t^2)\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert ^2+\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert (2\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert +\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert )\\&\quad +\,2t\langle u-x_n,j(z_t-x_n)\rangle . \end{aligned}$$
Then, we have
$$\langle u-x_n,j(z_t-x_n)\rangle \le \frac{t}{2}\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert ^2+\frac{\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert }{2t}(2\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert +\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert ).$$

Since \(\Vert S_rx_n-x_n\Vert \rightarrow 0\) as \(n\rightarrow 0\) by (17).

Let \(n\rightarrow \infty\), we obtain that
$$\limsup \limits _{n\rightarrow \infty }\langle u-x_n,j(z_t-x_n)\rangle \le \frac{t}{2}M,$$
(18)
where M is a constant such that \(\Vert z_t-x_n\Vert ^2\le M\) for all \(t\in (0,1)\) and \(n=1,2,\ldots\).
Since \(z_t\rightarrow Qu\) as \(t\rightarrow \infty\) and the duality mapping j is norm-to weak\(^*\) uniformly continuous on bounded subsets of E. Let \(t\rightarrow 0\) in (18), we have that
$$\limsup \limits _{n\rightarrow \infty }\langle u-Qu,j(x_{n+1}-Qu)\rangle \le 0.$$
(19)
Finally, we will show \(x_n\rightarrow Qu\). Applying Lemma 5 to get,
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert x_{n+1}-Qu\Vert ^2 &= \Vert (1-\alpha _n)(y_n-Qu)+\alpha _n(u-Qu)\Vert ^2\nonumber \\ &\le \Vert (1-\alpha _n)(y_n-Qu)\Vert ^2+2\alpha _n\langle u-Qu,j(x_{n+1}-Qu)\rangle \nonumber \\&\le (1-\alpha _n)(\Vert J_{H,r_{n}}^TH(x_{n})-Qu\Vert +\Vert y_n-J_{H,r_{n}}^TH(x_{n})\Vert )^2\nonumber \\&\quad +\,2\alpha _n\langle u-Qu,j(x_{n+1}-Qu)\rangle \nonumber \\&\le (1-\alpha _n)(\Vert x_n-Qu\Vert +\delta _n)^2+2\alpha _n\langle u-Qu,j(x_{n+1}-Qu)\rangle \nonumber \\&\le (1-\alpha _n)\Vert x_n-Qu\Vert ^2+2\alpha _n\langle u-Qu,j(x_{n+1}-Qu)\rangle +M\delta _n, \end{aligned}$$
(20)
where \(M>0\) is some constant such that \(2(1-\alpha _n)\Vert x_n-Qu\Vert +\delta _n\le M\). An application of Lemma 1 yields that \(\Vert x_n-Qu\Vert \rightarrow 0\)

This completes the proof. \(\square\)

Remark 2

If we take \(r=1\), \(a_0=0,a_1=1\) in Theorem 1, we can get Theorem 4.1 in Liu and He (2012).

Remark 3

If we suppose \(T_i\) (i = 1,2,...,r) is m-accretive in Theorem 1, we can get Theorem 3.3 in Zegeye and Shahzad (2007).

Conclusions

In this paper, we considered the strong convergence for a common zero of a finite family of H-accretive operators in Banach space using the Halpern iterative algorithm (16). The main results presented in this paper extend and improve the corresponding results of Zegeye and Shahzad (2007) and Liu and He (2012) and the related results.

Declarations

Authors' contributions

This work was carried out by the authors HH, SL, RC, in collaboration. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. JB150703), National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (No. 11501431), and National Science Foundation for Tian yuan of China (No. 11426167).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xidian University
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University

References

  1. Ahmad R, Usman F (2009) System of generalized variational inclusions with \(H\)-accretive operators in uniformly smooth Banach spaces. J Comput Appl Math 230:424–432View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Benavides TD, Acedo GL, Xu H-K (2003) Iterative solutions for zeros of accretive operators. Math Nachr 248–249:62–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.200310003 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ceng L-C, Khan AR, Ansari QH, Yao J-C (2009) Strong convergence of composite iterative schemes for zeros of \(m\)-accretive operators in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal 70:1830–1840View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen R, Liu Y, Shen X (2009) Iterative approximation of a zero of accretive operator in Banach space. Nonlinear Anal 71:e346–e350View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Day MM (1993) Normed Linear Spaces, 3rd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan QW, Wu W, Zurada JM (2016) Convergence of batch gradient learning with smoothing regularization and adaptive momentum for neural networks. SpringerPlus 5(295):1–17Google Scholar
  7. Fang YP, Huang NJ (2003) \(H\)-monotone operator and resolvent operator technique for variational inclusions. Appl Math Comput 145:795–803Google Scholar
  8. Fang Y, Huang N (2004) \(H\)-accretive operators and resolvent operator technique for solving variational inclusions in Banach spaces. Appl Math Lett 17:647–653View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Goebel K, Reich S (1984) Uniform convexity. Hyperbolic geometry and nonexpansive mappings. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang Z, Noor MA (2007) Equivalency of convergence between one-step iteration algorithm and two-step iteration algorithm of variational inclusions for \(H\)-monotone mappings. Comput Math Appl 53:1567–1571View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Jung JS (2010) Strong convergence of iterative schemes for zeros of accretive operators in reflexive banach spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/103465 Google Scholar
  12. Kamimura S, Takahashi W (2000) Weak and strong convergence of solutions to accretive operator inclusions and applications. Set-Valued Anal 8:361–374View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kartsatos Athanassios G (1996) On the perturbation theory of \(m\)-accretive operators in Banach spaces. Proc Am Math Soc 124(6):1811–1820View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li X, Huang N-J (2011) Graph convergence for the \(H(\cdot,\cdot )\)-accretive operator in Banach spaces with an application. Appl Math Comput 217:9053–9061Google Scholar
  15. Liu S, He H (2012) Approximating solution of \(0\in T(x)\) for an \(H\)-accretive operator in Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 385:466–476View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu S, He H, Chen R (2013) Approximating solution of \(0\in T(x)\) for an \(H\)-monotone operator in Hilbert spaces. Acta Math Sci (English Seiries) 33(5):1347–1360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Maing P-E (2006) Viscosity methods for zeroes of accretive operators. J Approx Theory 140:127–140View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Peng J-W (2008) On a new system of generalized mixed quasi-variational-like inclusions with \(H,\eta\)-accretive operators in real \(q\)-uniformly smooth Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal (TMA) 68:981–993View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Peng J, Zhu D (2007) A new system of generalized mixed quasi-variational inclusions with \(H,\eta\)-monotone operators. J Math Anal Appl 327:175–187View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Petryshyn WV (1970) A characterization of strict convexity of Banach spaces and other uses of duality mappings. J Func Anal 6(2):282–291View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Qin X, Su Y (2007) Approximation of a zero point of accretive operator in Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 329:415–424View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Reich S (1979) Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 67:274–276View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Reich S (1980) Strong convergence theorems for resolvents of accretive operators in Banach spaces. J Math Anal Appl 75:287–292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rockafellar RT (1976) Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J Control Optim 14(5):877–896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Song Y, Kang JI, Cho YJ (2010) On iterations methods for zeros of accretive operators in Banach spaces. Appl Math Comput 216:1007–1017Google Scholar
  26. Tang G-j, Wang X (2014) A perturbed algorithm for a system of variational inclusions involving \(H\)-accretive operators in Banach spaces. J Comput Appl Math 272:1–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang ZB, Ding XP (2010) \(H(\cdot,\cdot ),\eta\)-accretive operators with an application for solving set-valued variational inclusions in Banach spaces. Comput Math Appl 59:1559–1567View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Xia F-Q, Huang N-J (2007) Variational inclusions with a general \(H\)-monotone operator in Banach spaces. Comput Math Appl 54:24–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu H-K (2003) An iterative approach to quadratic optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 116:659–678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu H-K (2006) Strong convergence of an iterative method for nonexpansive and accretive operators. J Math Anal Appl 314:631–643View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zegeye H, Shahzad N (2007) Strong convergence theorems for a common zero of a finite family of \(m\)-accretive mappings. Nonlinear Anal 66:1161–1169View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou H, Cho YJ, Kang SM (2000) Characteristic Conditions for convergence of generalized steepest descent approximation to multivalued accretive operator equations. Comput Math Appl 39:1–11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zou Y-Z, Huang N-J (2008) \(H(\cdot,\cdot )\)-accretive operator with an application for solving variational inclusions in Banach spaces. Appl Math Comput 204:809–816Google Scholar
  34. Zou Y-Z, Huang N-J (2009) A new system of variational inclusions involving \(H(\cdot,\cdot )\)-accretive operator in Banach spaces. Appl Math Comput 212:135–144Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016