Open Access

Frequencies of ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma subtypes: a study of 2299 Chinese cases

  • Yongfeng Yu1,
  • Zhengping Ding1,
  • Lei Zhu2,
  • Haohua Teng2 and
  • Shun Lu1Email author
Contributed equally
SpringerPlus20165:894

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2607-5

Received: 6 April 2016

Accepted: 16 June 2016

Published: 27 June 2016

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the relationship between ALK status and lung adenocarcinoma subtypes, according to the IALSC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients.

Methods

A reclassification of 2299 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas was performed, and ALK status was detected by immunohistochemistry (Ventana Medical Systems) in Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Results

ALK rearrangements were identified in 93 of 2299 tumors (4.0 %). The ALK rearrangements frequencies were: 14.8 % (16/108), 10.3 % (20/195), 7.6 % (13/170), 2.8 % (29/1035), 2.5 % (3/119), 2.0 % (11/539), 0.9 % (1/114), and 0 % (0/19) for variants of invasive adenocarcinoma, solid predominant, micropapillary predominant, acinar predominant, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, papillary predominant, lepidic predominant, and adenocarcinoma in situ, respectively.

Conclusions

We reported significant discrepancies of ALK status in lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in Chinese patients.

Keywords

Lung adenocarcinoma Histologic classification ALK status

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortality in both men and women worldwide (Jemal et al. 2011). Adenocarcinoma has become the most common histologic type of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for nearly 40 % of all lung cancer cases, and it is a heterogeneous tumor. In 2011, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) proposed a new classification system for lung adenocarcinoma (Travis et al. 2011). The 2015 WHO classification of lung adenocarcinoma is consistent with the IALSC/ATS/ERS classification in resection specimens (Travis et al. 2015).

ALK rearrangements in NSCLC were first described in lung adenocarcinomas. Approximately 3–6 % of lung adenocarcinoma were shown to harbor rearrangements of the ALK gene, which has been demonstrated to be a potent oncogenic driver and a promising therapeutic target (Paik et al. 2011). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved crizotinib to treat locally advanced or metastatic ALK rearrangements lung adenocarcinomas (Shaw et al. 2013). Detecting ALK rearrangement is emerging as an important component of the pathologic analysis of lung adenocarcinomas. However, whether ALK status in lung adenocarcinomas correlates with histologic subtypes remains unclear.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not the proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification correlates with ALK status in Chinese patients.

Methods

Patients and eligibility

All patients had received curative surgery with pathologic stage I to stage III lung adenocarcinomas at Shanghai Chest Hospital between July 2013 and December 2014. These patients did not receive previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. Histological typing confirmed the lung adenocarcinoma according to the 2004 World Health Organization classification criteria. Lung cancer staging was performed for all the patients according to the seventh TNM classification. For all patients, medical records were reviewed to extract data on clinicopathologic characteristics. This study was approved by Shanghai Chest Hospital Ethics Committee.

Histological evaluation

All these tumor samples were fixed in 10 % neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin in the routine manner. Each of the slides was reviewed by two pathologists independently. Any discrepancies between the pathologists during determination of predominant subtypes were resolved via consensus by using a multiple-headed microscope. The average number of slides from each case reviewed in the this study was 8 (range 4–26). According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification scheme, each tumor was examined using comprehensive histologic subtyping, recording the percentage in 5 % increments for each histologic component. Tumors were classified as adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, and invasive adenocarcinomas, which were divided into lepidic predominant, papillary predominant, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant and solid predominant. Variants of invasive adenocarcinoma included invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma and others. The predominant pattern was defined as the pattern with the greatest percentage.

ALK immunohistochemistry

IHC was performed for all cases on 5-μm thick FFPE sections with the D5F3 rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies) in a Bechmark XT staining module (Ventana Medical Systems, Illkirch Graffenstaden, France). The slides were dried at 60 °C for 1 h, deparaffinized using EZ Prep at 75 °C for 4 min, and incubated with the primary mAb at a dilution of 1:100 for 1 h at 37 °C for all samples. Detection was performed with the OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit with signal amplification (Ventana Medical Systems). A positive external control consisting of a slide of a previously FISH-validated ALK-rearranged and IHC-positive sample was included. Negative controls consisted of the omission of the primary antibody and incubation with immunoglobulins of the same species. All sections were independently evaluated by two pathologists using a semi-quantitative system based on the H-index: 3× percentage of strongly staining cells + 2× percentage of moderately staining cells + percentage of weakly staining cells, giving “composite scores” that ranged from 0 to 300. Cases with the scores of 0 to 100 were interpreted as negative, 101 to 300 as positive.

EGFR mutation analysis

Tumor samples were obtained from resected lesions. Tumor DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK), and EGFR mutation was analyzed using the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based EGFR mutation detection kit (EGFR RGQ PCR kit, Qiagen, Crawley, UK) as instructed by the manufacturer. The commercial kit allows detection of 29 mutations in the EGFR gene.

Statistical analysis

The Chi squared test was used to evaluate the relationships between ALK status and clinicopathologic variables. A probability level of 0.05 was chosen for statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 16 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Patient clinicopathologic characteristics

Of the 2299 lung adenocarcinoma patients, the median age was 60 years in the current cohort. There were 975 men and 1324 women. 1580 were never smokers and 719 were former or current smokers. Pathologic stages were stage I in 1866 patients, stage II in 189 patients, and stage III in 244 patients. According to the IALSC/ATS/ERS classification, the most prevalent subtype was acinar predominant (45.0 %), followed by papillary predominant (23.4 %), solid predominant (8.5 %), micropapillary predominant (7.4 %), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (5.2 %), lepidic predominant (5.0 %), variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (4.7 %), and adenocarcinoma in situ (0.8 %). The clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Characteristics

Number (%)

Gender

 Male

975 (42.4)

 Female

1324 (57.6)

Age (years)

 Range

21–83

 Median

60

 <65

1586 (69.0)

 ≥65

713 (31.0)

Smoking status

 Never

1580 (68.7)

 Former/current

719 (31.3)

Stage

 I

1866 (81.2)

 II

189 (8.2)

 III

244 (10.6)

ALK status

 Positive

93 (4.0)

 Negative

2206 (96.0)

Adenocarcinoma subtypes(IASLC/ATS/ERS)

 Adenocarcinoma in situ

19 (0.8)

 Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma

119 (5.2)

 Invasive adenocarcinoma

  Lepidic predominant

114 (5.0)

  Acinar predominant

1035 (45.0)

  Papillary predominant

539 (23.4)

  Micropapillary predominant

170 (7.4)

  Solid predominant

195 (8.5)

 Variants of invasive adenocarcinoma

108 (4.7)

Relationship between clinicopathologic characteristics and ALK status

Of the 2299 cases, ALK rearrangements were detected in 93 cases (4.0 %). ALK rearrangements were detected more frequently in younger age patients than in older age patients (5.0 vs. 1.8 %; p = 0.0003). ALK rearrangements were more frequent in patients with advanced clinical stage than in patients with early pathologic stage (6.7 % vs. 3.4 %; p = 0.002). Neither gender nor smoking status showed any significant association with frequencies of ALK rearrangements. Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and ALK status is listed in Table 2. Among 93 cases with ALK rearrangements, 87 cases received EGFR mutation analysis. The overall frequency of concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were found in 6.9 % (6/87) ALK-rearranged patients.
Table 2

Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and ALK status

 

ALK positive number

ALK negative number

p

Total

93

2206

 

Gender

 Male

38

937

0.76

 Female

55

1269

Age, (years)

 <65

80

1506

0.0003

 ≥65

13

700

Smoking status

 Never

61

1519

0.51

 Former/current

32

687

Stage

 I

64

1802

0.002

 II/III

29

404

Relationship between adenocarcinoma subtypes (IASLC/ATS/ERS) and ALK status

The ALK rearrangements frequencies were: 14.8 % (16/108) for variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (15 invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma and 1 colloid adenocarcinoma), 10.3 % (20/195) for solid predominant, 7.6 % (13/170) for micropapillary predominant, 2.8 % (29/1035) for acinar predominant, 2.5 % (3/119) for minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 2.0 % (11/539) for papillary predominant, 0.9 % (1/114) for lepidic predominant, and 0 % (0/19) for adenocarcinoma in situ, respectively. ALK rearrangements were significantly associated with variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (p < 0.0001), solid predominant subtype (p < 0.0001), and micropapillary predominant subtype (p = 0.013). The relationship between adenocarcinoma subtypes (IASLC/ATS/ERS) and ALK status is shown in Table 3. Detection of ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma patient by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is shown in Fig. 1. Details on the clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients with ALK rearrangements are provided in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Table 3

Relationship between adenocarcinoma subtypes (IASLC/ATS/ERS) and ALK status

 

ALK positive number

ALK negative number

P

Adenocarcinoma in situ

  

0.75

 Yes

0 (0.0 %)

19

 

 No

93

2187

Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma

  

0.53

 Yes

3 (2.5 %)

116

 

 No

90

2090

Lepidic predominant

  

0.13

 Yes

1 (0.9 %)

113

 

 No

92

2093

Acinar predominant

  

0.006

  Yes

29 (2.8 %)

1006

 

  No

64

1200

Papillary predominant

  

0.007

 Yes

11(2.0 %)

528

 

 No

82

1678

Micropapillary predominant

  

0.013

 Yes

13 (7.6 %)

157

 

 No

80

2049

Solid predominant

  

<0.0001

 Yes

20 (10.3 %)

175

 

 No

73

2031

Variants of invasive adenocarcinoma

  

<0.0001

 Yes

16 (14.8 %)

92

 

 No

77

2114

Fig. 1

Detection of ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinoma patient (case No.253) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). a Solid predominant subtype of lung adenocarcinoma was shown by HE staining. Original magnification ×200. b Ventana IHC assay revealed strong expression of ALK in the patient. Original magnification ×200. c IHC result showed TTF-1 positive in the patient. Original magnification ×100

Discussion

ALK rearrangements were more often found in younger age patients, in never or light ex-smokers and in lung adenocarcinomas (Paik et al. 2011). Rodig et al. identified 20 (5.6 %) ALK rearrangements patients in 358 lung adenocarcinomas and found ALK rearrangements to be associated with younger age (p = 0.0002), never smoking (p < 0.0001) (Rodig et al. 2009). However, some previous studies found that the ALK rearrangements were not associated with smoking status (Koh et al. 2011). In our study, a total of 2299 consecutive and unselected patients who underwent definitive surgery for lung adenocarcinoma at the Shanghai Chest Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. We found ALK rearrangements was detected more frequently in younger age patients than in older age patients (5.0 vs. 1.8 %; p = 0.0003). In our cohort, 1580 cases (68.7 %) were never smokers. Meanwhile, there were a high proportion of female patients (1324 cases, 57.6 %). Because of cultural reasons, the majority of female Chinese patients were never smokers. The previous reports have showed ALK Rearrangement occurs most likely in never or light smokers. However, smoking status showed no significant association with frequencies of ALK rearrangements in our study (p = 0.51). We do not know the real reasons. On the other hand, the majority of patients had stage I tumors (1866 cases, 81.2 %). With low dose spiral CT scan widely used in physical examination, increasing number of patients with early-stage disease are detected in Shanghai, especially for the female patients, most of whom are never smokers. The relevant data is shown in the reports of Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention (http://www.scdc.sh.cn). The reasons why the female population suffers lung cancer are still unknown. Kim et al. investigated 80 ALK-rearranged and 213 ALK-negative resected lung adenocarcinomas and observed that ALK-rearranged tumors were associated with frequent nodal metastasis, and higher stage of disease at diagnosis (Kim et al. 2014). Other previous studies also confirmed this results (Rodig et al. 2009; Blackhall et al. 2014). Our study showed that ALK rearrangements were more frequent in patients with advanced clinical stage than in patients with early pathologic stage (p = 0.002).

ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas were associated with histologic subtypes. Nishino et al. analyzed specimens from 104 ALK rearrangements and 215 ALK negative lung adenocarcinomas and found that the majority (54 %) of ALK rearrangements tumors with signet ring cells demonstrated a solid predominant pattern (Nishino et al. 2012). In other studies, it was also reported that a solid histology with signet-ring cells was significantly associated with ALK rearrangements lung adenocarcinomas (Pareja et al. 2015; Pan et al. 2014). In our study, we found that ALK rearrangements frequencies were significantly higher in variants of invasive adenocarcinoma (14.8 %), solid predominant subtype (10.3 %), and micropapillary predominant subtype (7.6 %) than that of other subtypes. Up to now, our report is the largest Asian data in this field. The results of this study can therefore be more confidently generalized to the Chinese population than other publications.

In our study, the overall frequency of concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were found in 6.9 % (6/87) ALK rearranged patients. ALK rearrangements are often mutually exclusive with other oncogenic alterations detected in NSCLC including EGFR mutations. Yang et al. reported that the overall frequency of concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements was 1.3 % (13/977). EGFR/ALK co-alterations were found in 3.9 % (13/336) EGFR-mutant and 18.6 % (13/70) ALK-rearranged patients (Yang et al. 2014). Sasaki et al. identified a subset (3/50; 6 %) of treatment naive NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangements that also had concurrent EGFR activating mutations. They further found the resistance mechanisms to ALK TKIs mediated by both ALK and by a bypass signaling pathway mediated by EGFR, and these mechanisms can occur independently, or in the same cancer (Sasaki et al. 2011).

Break-apart fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the only diagnostic tool approved by the FDA. The low incidence of ALK rearrangement (about 4 % in NSCLC) requires a more rapid and cost-efficient method for screening. Many countries have adopted immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by FISH confirmation. In 2013, the IHC (Ventana Medical Systems) for ALK status was approved by China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). A high concordance between IHC and FISH results has been reported. However, recent large-scaled studies have also found more than a few cases with discordant results between IHC and FISH. A single assay strategy can lead to inadequate selection of patients (Martin et al. 2015; Ilie et al. 2015). Some possible causes have been proposed. Intracellular and extracellular mucin can cause false-negative and false-positive results, respectively, in IHC analysis. In terms of FISH, atypical FISH signals, such as a 3′-5′-3′ red doublet pattern, and compressed z-stacked images for vertically split signals may give false-negative results. The unique method of IHC (Ventana Medical Systems) was the limitation of the present study.

In conclusion, we reported significant discrepancies of ALK status in lung adenocarcinoma subtypes according to the IALSC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YY carried out data analysis and drafted the manuscript. ZD participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. LZ participated in histological evaluation. HT participated in histological evaluation. SL conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201692), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Research Project (16431903200), Wu Jie Ping Medical Foundation (320.6750.13350), Shanghai Chest Hospital Science and Technology Development Fund (2014YZDC10600), and Key Project of Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission (201540365).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
(2)
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

References

  1. Blackhall FH, Peters S, Bubendorf L et al (2014) Prevalence and clinical outcomes for patients with ALK-positive resected stage I to III adenocarcinoma: results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape Project. J Clin Oncol 32:2780–2787View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ilie MI, Bence C, Hofman V et al (2015) Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK ‘borderline’-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies. Ann Oncol 26:238–244View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim TJ, Park CK, Yeo CD et al (2014) Simultaneous diagnostic platform of genotyping EGFR, KRAS, and ALK in 510 Korean patients with non-small-cell lung cancer highlights significantly higher ALK rearrangement rate in advanced stage. J Surg Oncol 110:245–251View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Koh Y, Kim DW, Kim TM et al (2011) Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: suggestion for an effective screening strategy for these tumors. J Thorac Oncol 6:905–912View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin V, Bernasconi B, Merlo E et al (2015) ALK testing in lung adenocarcinoma: technical aspects to improve FISH evaluation in daily practice. J Thorac Oncol 10:595–602View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nishino M, Klepeis VE, Yeap BY et al (2012) Histologic and cytomorphologic features of ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 25:1462–1472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Paik JH, Choe G, Kim H, Choe JY, Lee HJ, Lee CT, Lee JS, Jheon S, Chung JH (2011) Screening of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement by immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Thorac Oncol 6:466–472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Pan Y, Zhang Y, Li Y et al (2014) ALK, ROS1 and RET fusions in 1139 lung adenocarcinomas: a comprehensive study of common and fusion pattern-specific clinicopathologic, histologic and cytologic features. Lung Cancer 84:121–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pareja F, Crapanzano JP, Mansukhani MM, Bulman WA, Saqi A (2015) Cytomorphological features of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinomas: psammoma bodies and signet ring cells. Cancer Cytopathol 123:162–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodig SJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Dacic S et al (2009) Unique clinicopathologic features characterize ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma in the western population. Clin Cancer Res 15:5216–5223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sasaki T, Koivunen J, Ogino A et al (2011) A novel ALK secondary mutation and EGFR signaling cause resistance to ALK kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res 71:6051–6060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K et al (2013) Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 368:2385–2394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M et al (2011) International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 6:244–285View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG et al (2015) The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 10:1243–1260View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang JJ, Zhang XC, Su J et al (2014) Lung cancers with concomitant EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements: diverse responses to EGFR-TKI and crizotinib in relation to diverse receptors phosphorylation. Clin Cancer Res 20:1383–1392View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016