Simultaneous decompression of the orbital lateral wall and optic canal for fibrous dysplasia in early adolescence
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 6 May 2015
Accepted: 26 May 2016
Published: 14 June 2016
Patients with fronto-orbital fibrous dysplasia (FD) occasionally present fronto-orbital protrusion, exophthalmos, and visual acuity disturbance. Simultaneous management of these conditions has not been previously described.
A-10-year-old female with fronto-orbital FD complained of left visual acuity disturbance. Head computed tomography showed compressed optic canal secondary to thickened bone. Decompression of the optic canal via the left frontotemporal extradural approach, opening of the lateral orbital wall, and dissection of the prominent zygoma were done simultaneously. The patient’s visual acuity disturbance and exophthalmos subsequently improved postoperatively.
Discussion and evaluation
When optic canal decompression is performed by the fronto-temporal approach, opening of the lateral orbital wall can be done simultaneously to decrease the intraorbital pressure and to prevent exophthalmos. In addition, although aesthetic plastic surgery is not generally recommended during the growing phase (due to the possibility of recurrence), this approach can prevent skin loosening and adverse cosmetic outcomes.
Aesthetic plastic surgery for fronto-orbital FD is recommended to prevent skin loosening. Opening of the lateral orbital wall should be performed when optic canal decompression is planned.
Fronto-orbital fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a relatively rare disease characterized by fronto-orbital protrusion, exophthalmos, and downward mobilization of the eyeball that leads to orbital dystopia. Patients with this condition may experience loss of visual acuity (Papay et al. 1995; Kaneshige et al. 2014; Abe et al. 2002, 2006; Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997). Treatment for progressive visual acuity disturbance associated with FD and aesthetic facial plastic surgery for FD during the growing phase are controversial approaches (Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997). We performed optic canal decompression and combined decompression of the orbital lateral wall to decrease the intraorbital pressure in a patient in early adolescence. This combined technique has not been previously reported. Visual acuity disturbance and exophthalmos improved in response to this combined technique. In addition, we discuss the necessity for aesthetic plastic surgery during the growing phase.
Onset and course
Plastic surgery was planned for left visual acuity disturbance, prominent cheek and exophthalmos. Therapeutic optic canal decompression was performed via a left frontotemporal extradural approach using a surgical navigation system (Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan). We drilled the superior wall of the superior orbital fissure and optic canal using a diamond bar under a microscope. This was performed with extra care as the orbital roof was affected and thickened by FD (Fig. 2d). In addition, dissection was continued toward the anterior clinoid process. Dissected bone was mixed in composition (soft and stiff). We identified the bulging appearance of the optic sheath, indicating that it was markedly compressed. There were no vascular complications during the operation.
Postoperative CT revealed satisfactory decompression of the left optic canal (Fig. 3b, c) Left visual acuity gradually improved (0.125p × S − 2.5D: C − 0.75D Ax 15) by 30 days after the operation. Her formerly prominent left cheek and exophthalmos became practically unnoticeable (Fig. 1b).
Discussion and evaluation
Fronto-orbital FD sometimes causes disturbance of ocular movement as well as deterioration and disturbance of visual acuity (Papay et al. 1995; Kaneshige et al. 2014; Rahman et al. 2009). Therapeutic decompression is an accepted approach for this condition, especially for the cases with progressive gradual visual disturbance and within 1 week of a sudden visual loss secondary to FD (Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997).
However, the efficacy of prophylactic decompression is controversial. In fact, some studies suggested that even if narrowing of the optic canal is noticed, visual acuity is not necessarily affected. In addition, decompression of the optic canal, especially for FD, carries a risk of iatrogenic visual impairment, even when treated by experienced neurosurgeons, as reported by Kaneshige et al. (2014). The operative difficulty is increased by the thickness of bone with abnormal anatomy of the frontal skull base and the surrounding of the anterior clinoid process. It is also difficult to secure a clear working space because the diploe tends to bleed in cases of FD. Therefore, several authors have suggested working from the normal tissue towards the diseased tissue and avoiding drilling in the area of the optic canal (to avoid vascular incidents) (Janice et al. 2002; Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997). In addition, use of a navigation system can help prevent iatrogenic visual loss.
Recurrent FD after optic nerve decompression has not been widely reported (Rahman et al. 2009; Abe et al. 2002, 2006; Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997). However, Kusano et al. (2009) suggested that FD related to McCune–Albright syndrome tends to recur after decompression of the optic canal and is associated with poor outcomes. As a result, management of visual acuity disturbance caused by FD with involvement of the optic canal remains controversial. We believe that optic canal decompression for FD is beneficial because the visual acuity of several patients has improved after optic nerve decompression. In addition, opening of the lateral orbital wall can decrease the intraorbital pressure and prevent exophthalmos. When optic canal decompression is performed via the fronto-temporal approach, combined opening of the lateral orbital wall can be done simultaneously in the same operative field. A required step is separating the periorbita from the orbital lateral wall, and the lateral wall opened using a cutting bar to protect the periorbita. Generally, after complete osteotomy of the orbital lateral wall, the orbital edge should be fixed with a titanium plate. However, as artificial materials should not be used, in the present case we saved a 5-mm edge the orbital edge when the lateral wall of the orbita was opened because. The maximum size of decompression is up to the greater sphenoid wing. Orbital lateral wall decompression is said to be effective for ophthalmopathy. Decompression could improve the exophthalmos by 5 mm on average (Goldberg et al. 1998, 2000; Leone et al. 1989).
Visual acuity disturbance of this patient is probably caused by increased orbital pressure and optic canal stenosis. Therefore, opening of the lateral orbital wall via decompression and optic canal decompression should be performed at the same time. In addition, lateral orbital wall decompression has a beneficial cosmetic effect in patients with exophthalmos. Generally, aesthetic plastic surgery during the patient’s growing phase should not be done, because facial prominence has been thought to be generally progressive. This disease tends to resolve after puberty, so plastic surgery is recommended only in adults, because if symmetrical reconstruction of the prominent area was done, there is a high risk of recurrence in a patient in the growing phase. (Ying et al. 2007; Yu et al. 1997). However, if aesthetic plastic surgery is performed during adulthood, skin loosening is often identified. In addition, FD related to McCune–Albright syndrome often shows rapid progression and continues after early adolescence (Kusano et al. 2009), resulting in worsening skin loosening. This can cause significant adverse social effects for younger patients with FD (e.g., they can be targets for social bullying based on their appearance). Therefore, patients with McCune–Albright syndrome should undergo aesthetic plastic surgery, even during the growing phase. We recommend additional early stage reconstruction for such patients, especially if there is a plan to decompress the optic canal to address progressive gradual visual disturbance.
If a patient has FD with exophthalmos and visual acuity disturbance caused by optic canal stenosis, simultaneous decompression of the orbital lateral wall and optic canal should be performed for the cause of that they are able to perform at same pterional skin incision. In this manner, exophthalmos and visual acuity disturbance can improve simultaneously. Aesthetic plastic surgery is recommended for orbito-frontal FD caused by McCune–Albright syndrome in the growing phase to prevent skin loosening.
RT has made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. TM conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. YS conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. MK conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. KK has given final approval of the version to be published. KY has given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We are very grateful to Takayuki Ohira of the Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine for his comment of this technique.
The patient has consented to the submission of the case report for submission to the journal. In addition, we got consent form from her parents.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Abe T, Sato K, Otsuka T, Kawamura N, Shimazu M, Izumiyama H, Matsumoto K (2002) Optic nerve decompression for orbitofrontal fibrous dysplasia. Skull Base 12:145–152View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abe T, Satoh K, Wada A (2006) Orbitofrontal fibrous dysplasia: recent development of surgical technique and equipment. Skull Base 16:145–155View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg RA, Kim AJ, Kerivan KM (1998) The lacrimal keyhole, orbital door jamb, and basin of the inferior orbital fissure. Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 116:1618–1624View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldberg RA, Perry JD, Hortaleza V, Tong JT (2000) Strabismus after balanced medial plus lateral wall versus lateral wall only orbital decompression for dysthyroid orbitipathy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 16:271–277View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janice SL, Fitzgibbon Edmond, John AB, Craig RD, Harvey K, Shlomo W, Pamela GR, Michael TC (2002) Normal vision despite narrowing of the optic canal in fibrous dysplasia. N Engl J Med 347:1670–1676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaneshige S, Nobuyuki M, Takumi A (2014) Is prophylactic decompression of the optic canal necessary in surgical correction of fronto-orbigtal fibrous dysplasia? A review of 11 consecutive cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 42:1614–1616View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kusano T, Hirabayashi S, Eguchi T, Sugawara Y (2009) Treatment strategies for fibrous dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 20:768–770View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leone CR, Piest KL, Newman RJ (1989) Medial and lateral wall decompression for thyroid ophthalmopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 108:160–166View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papay FA, Morales L, Flaharty P, Smith SJ, Anderson R, Walker JM, Hood RS, Hardy S (1995) Optic nerve decompression in cranial base fibrous dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 6:5–10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahman AM, Madge SN, Billing K, Anderson PJ, Leibovitch I, Selva D, David D (2009) Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes. Eye 23:2175–2181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ying CT, Chung CY, Chen NC, Lih M, Yu RC (2007) Optic nerve compression in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: the role and indications for decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1957–1962View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu RC, Alan B, Chen NC (1997) Optic nerve decompression in fibrous dysplasia: indications, efficacy, and safety. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:22–30View ArticleGoogle Scholar