A new Sumudu transform iterative method for time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equation
- Kangle Wang†^{1}Email author and
- Sanyang Liu†^{1}
Received: 8 November 2015
Accepted: 26 May 2016
Published: 24 June 2016
Abstract
In this paper, a new Sumudu transform iterative method is established and successfully applied to find the approximate analytical solutions for time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equations. The approach is easy to implement and understand. The numerical results show that the proposed method is very simple and efficient.
Keywords
Background
The fractional differential equations have gained a lot of attention of physicists, mathematicians and engineers in the past two decades (Oldham and Spanier 1974; Hilfer 2000; Kilbas et al. 1993; Podlubny 1999; Debnath 1997; Yang and Srivastava 2015; Yang et al. 2015b, c, d; Wang et al. 2014, 2015a, b, c; Jiwari and Mittal 2011). All kinds of interdisciplinary problems can be modeled with the help of fractional derivatives. However, it is very difficult for us to find their exact solutions to most fractional differential equations, so numerical and approximation methods have to be used. So far, many methods have been used to solve linear and nonlinear fractional differential equations. For example, the Adomain decomposition method (ADM) (Wazwaz 1999), the homotopy perturbation method (HPM) (He 1999), the variational iteration method (VIM) (Safari et al. 2009), homotopy analysis method (HAM) (Liao 1992, 2004) and differential quadrature method (Jiwari et al. 2012). The time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equation (Verma et al. 2014; Jiwari et al. 2014; Mittal and Jiwari 2011) is one of all the important fractional partial differential equations. The time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equations can be used to describe many kinds of linear and nonlinear systems in chemistry, physics, ecology, biology and engineering (Britton 1998; Grindrod 1996). Kumar (2013) have obtained the approximate solutions of time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equations by using the homotopy perturbation transform method with the help of Laplace transform. In Gejji and Jafari (2006), proposed NIM for solving linear and nonlinear integral and differential equation. The NIM is very easy to understand and implement and obtain better result than existing methods.
In this paper, we establish a new Sumudu transform iterative method (NSTIM) with the help of the Sumudu transform (Chaurasia and Singh 2010) for obtaining analytical and numerical solutions of the time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equations. Our iterative method is new and generalizes NIM due to Gejji and Jafari (2006). The advantage of this new method which we proposed is to make the calculation simple and highly accurate to approximate the exact solution.
Basic definition
In this section, we give some basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus and Sumudu transform, which we will use in this paper:
Definition 1
A real function \(f(x),\,x>0\), is said to be in the space \(C_{\mu }\), \(\mu \in {R}\) if there exists a real number \(p,\,(p>\mu )\), such that \(f(x)=x^{p}f_{1}(x)\), where \(f_{1}(x)\in {C[0,\infty )}\), and it is said to be in the space \(C_{\mu }^{m}\) if \(f^{(m)}\in {C_{\mu }}\), \(m\in {N}\) (Dimovski 1982).
Definition 2
Properties of the operator \(I^{\alpha }\), which we will use here, are as follows
Definition 3
Definition 4
Definition 5
Definition 6
The new Sumudu transform iterative method (NSTIM)
Numerical examples
Example 1
Example 2
The series (28) is approximate to the form \(u(x,t)=e^{x^{2}+t}\) for \(\alpha =1\), which is the exact solution of Eq. (25) for \(\alpha =1\). The result is complete agreement with HPTM (Kumar 2013).
Example 3
The exact solution of Eq. (29) is \(u(x,t)=e^{x^{2}+t^{2}}\) for \(\alpha =1\).
Remark 1
Remark 2
Comparison between the 10th-order approximate solution of Eq. (20) and the exact solution for \(\alpha =1\)
x | t | \(u_{exa}\) | \(u_{NSTIM}\) | \(|u_{exa}-u_{10app}|\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha =1\) | ||||
0.2 | 0.3 | 0.9668943972 | 0.9668943972 | \(0.0\times 10^{-10}\) |
0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9666473343 | 0.9666473342 | \(1.0\times 10^{-10}\) |
0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8809364777 | 0.8809364778 | \(1.0\times 10^{-10}\) |
0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8111155787 | 0.8111155801 | \(1.4\times 10^{-9}\) |
Comparison between the 10th-order approximate solution of Eq. (25) and the exact solution for \(\alpha =1\)
x | t | \(u_{exa}\) | \(u_{NSTIM}\) | \(|u_{exa}-u_{10app}|\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha =1\) | ||||
0.3 | 0.4 | 1.632316221 | 1.632316221 | \(0.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.5 | 0.6 | 2.339646852 | 2.339646853 | \(1.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.6 | 0.7 | 2.886370989 | 2.886370989 | \(0.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.7 | 0.8 | 3.632786555 | 3.632786553 | \(2.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
Comparison between the 5th-order approximate solution of Eq. (29) and the exact solution for \(\alpha =1\)
x | t | \(u_{exa}\) | \(u_{NSTIM}\) | \(|u_{exa}-u_{5app}|\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha =1\) | ||||
0.2 | 0.3 | 1.138828383 | 1.138828331 | 0.000000052 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 1.506817785 | 1.506807822 | 0.000009963 |
0.3 | 0.6 | 1.568312186 | 1.568253566 | 0.000058620 |
0.7 | 0.8 | 3.095656500 | 3.094024665 | 0.001631835 |
Example 4
Remark 4
Comparison between the 10th-order approximate solution of Eq. (33) and the exact solution for \(\alpha =1\)
x | t | \(u_{exa}\) | \(u_{NSTIM}\) | \(|u_{exa}-u_{10app}|\) |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(\alpha =1\) | ||||
0.2 | 0.2 | 1.491824698 | 1.491824698 | \(0.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.4 | 0.3 | 2.013752707 | 2.013752707 | \(0.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.6 | 0.4 | 2.718281828 | 2.718281129 | \(1.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
0.7 | 0.8 | 4.481689070 | 4.481689066 | \(4.0\times 10^{-9}\) |
Conclusion
In this paper, the new Sumudu transform iterative method has been successfully applied for finding the approximate solution for the time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equation. The advantage of the new Sumudu transform iterative method (NSTIM) is to combine new iterative method (NIM) and Sumudu transform for obtaining exact and approximate analytical solutions for the time-fractional Cauchy reaction–diffusion equations.The numerical results show that the Sumudu transform iterative method is highly efficient and accurate with less calculation than existing methods.
Notes
Declarations
Authors' contributions
KW and SL contributed substantially to this paper, participated in drafting and checking the manuscript and have approved the version to be published. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowlegements
The authors are very grateful to the editor and referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61373174).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Bhalekar S, Gejji VD (2011) Convergence of the new iterative method. Int J Differ Eq 2011:989065. doi:10.1155/2011/989065 Google Scholar
- Britton NF (1998) Reaction–diffusion equations and their applications to biology. Academic Press/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chaurasia VBL, Singh J (2010) Application of Sumudu transform in Schrödinger equation occurring in quantum mechanics. Appl Math Sci 4(7):2843–2850Google Scholar
- Debnath L (1997) Nonlinear partial differential equations for scientist and engineers. Birkhauser, BostonView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dimovski IH (1982) Convolutional calculus. Bulgariam Academy of Science, SofiaGoogle Scholar
- Gejji VD, Jafari H (2006) An iterative method for solving non linear functional equations. J Math Anal Appl 316:753–763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grindrod P (1996) The theory and applications of reaction–diffusion equations. In: Oxford applied mathematics and computing science series, 2nd edn. The Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- He JH (1999) Homotopy perturbation technique. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 178(3):257–262View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hilfer R (2000) Application of fractional calculus in physics. World Scientific, SingaporeView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiwari R, Mittal RC (2011) A higher order numerical scheme for singularly perturbed Burger–Huxley equation. J Appl Math Inform 29(3–4):813–829Google Scholar
- Jiwari R, Pandit S, Mittal RC (2012) Numerical simulation of two-dimensional sine-Gordon solitons by differential quadrature method. Comput Phys Commun 183:600–616View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiwari R, Yuan JY, Jiwari R (2014) A computational modeling of two dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system arising in chemical processes. J Math Chem 52(6):1535–1551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kilbas AA, Samko SG, Marichev OI (1993) Fractional integrals and derivatives theory and applications. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S (2013) A new fractional modeling arising in engineering sciences and its analytical approximate solution. Alex Eng J 52(4):813–819View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liao SJ (1992) The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems, (Ph.D) thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Liao SJ (2004) On the homotopy analysis method for nonlinear problems. Appl Math Comput 147:499–513Google Scholar
- Mittal RC, Jiwari R (2011) Numerical study of two-dimensional reaction–diffusion Brusselator system. Appl Math Comput 217(12):5404–5415Google Scholar
- Momani S, Yildirim A (2010) Analytical approximate solutions of the fractional convection diffusion equation with nonlinear source term by He homotopy perturbation method. Int J Comput Math 87(5):1057–1065View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oldham KB, Spanier J (1974) The fractional calulus. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Safari M, Ganji DD, Moslemi M (2009) Application of He’s variational iteration method and Adomian’s decomposition method to the fractional KdV–Burgers–Kuramoto equation. Comput Appl 58:2091–2097View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verma A, Jiwari R, Koksal ME (2014) Analytic and numerical solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations via symmetry reductions. Adv Differ Eq 2014:229View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Ye Y, Pan X, Gao X, Zhuang C (2014) Fractional zero-phase filtering based on the Riemann–Liouville integral. Signal Process 98(5):150–157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JH, Ye YQ, Gao XD (2015a) Fractional 90-degree phase-shift filtering based on the double-sided Grunwald–Letnikov differintegrator. IET Signal Process 9(4):328–334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JH, Ye YQ, Gao YB, Gao XD, Qian SQ (2015b) Fractional compound integral with application to ECG signal denoising. Circuits Syst Signal Process 34:1915–1930View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JH, Ye YQ, Pan XP, Gao XD (2015c) Parallel-type fractional zero-phase filtering for ECG signal denoising. Biomed Signal Process Control 18:36–41View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wazwaz AM (1999) A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method. Appl Math Comput 102:77–86Google Scholar
- Yang XJ, Srivastava HM (2015) An asymptotic perturbation solution for a linear oscillator of free damped vibrations in fractal medium described by local fractional derivatives. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 29(1):499–504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang XJ, Baleanu D, Srivastava HM (2015a) Local fractional integral transforms and their applications. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Yang XJ, Baleanu D, Srivastava HM (2015b) Local fractional similarity solution for the diffusion equation defined on Cantor sets. Appl Math Lett 47:54–60View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang XJ, Srivastava HM, Cattani C (2015c) Local fractional homotopy perturbation method for solving fractal partial differential equations arising in mathematical physics. Roman Rep Phys 67(3):752–761Google Scholar
- Yang XJ, Baleanu D, Lazarevic Mihailo P, Cajic Milan S (2015d) Fractal boundary value problems for integral and differential equations with local fractional operators. Therm Sci 19(3):959–966View ArticleGoogle Scholar