Open Access

Effect of risk factors on the prevalence of influenza infections among children of slums of Dhaka city

  • Sabita Rezwana Rahman1Email author,
  • Md Firoz Ahmed2,
  • Mohammad Ariful Islam1, 3 and
  • Md. Majibur Rahman1
SpringerPlus20165:602

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2275-5

Received: 15 October 2015

Accepted: 4 May 2016

Published: 11 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Influenza viruses may cause severe acute respiratory illness among human population. People of densely populated areas, e.g., slum, are mostly affected by influenza viruses. Although potential vaccines to influenza viruses have been developed, infection rate is still high, therefore, increase the morbidity and mortality rate in slum areas. To treat these infections, slum dwellers including children and mothers do not get proper medication as well as vaccination. Hence, prevention remains to be the only mean to tackle such infections. Herein, we determined the prevalence of influenza infections among nutritionally deprived children and mothers of slum areas in Dhaka city and demonstrated the association with different risk factors like age, gender and socio-economic status.

Results

Nasopharyngeal swab samples and a short demography of all the participants suffering from influenza-like illness (ILI) were collected. The samples were subjected to RNA extraction and then real-time RT-PCR to detect influenza viruses. Among the ILI patients, about 87.9 % did not have knowledge about influenza infections and 80.5 % did not cover their noses during coughing as well as sneezing. Children were significantly infected by both influenza A and influenza B viruses, suggesting their vulnerability to these infections. Additionally, among the children with ILI, influenza infections were significantly associated with age below or equal to three years, very poor family incomes, practicing unhygienic habits and nutritional deficiency.

Conclusions

This study suggests that proper vaccination, improved sanitary conditions and nutritional diet may help reduce the risk of influenza infections in slum areas.

Keywords

Nutrition Influenza Children RT-PCR Risk factors

Background

Influenza viruses cause a large portion of respiratory illness which sometimes reach epidemic level of infection (Belshe et al. 2007; Yusuf et al. 2007; Abdullah Brooks et al. 2007). Seasonal respiratory infection is an important cause of hospitalization and excess mortality not only in winter season but also all year-round (Ou et al. 2013; Weerasinghe et al. 2002; Woodhouse et al. 1994; Koul et al. 2014). Globally, more than 1 billion people are infected annually by influenza viruses, whereas, most of them are from developing countries including Bangladesh (Kamlangdee et al. 2014; Sydnor and Perl 2011; Fedson 2009; Oshitani et al. 2008). Studies of influenza infections documented that in Bangladesh more than 50 % of the child respiratory infections are caused by influenza viruses (Nasreen et al. 2014; Bhuiyan et al. 2014).

Influenza virus is a negative-stranded RNA virus whose genome consists of eight segments encoding at least 10 polypeptides (Elton et al. 2001; Obayashi et al. 2008). The influenza viruses are divided into several types based on the antigenic differences of nucleoprotein and matrix proteins. Additionally, genome reassortments and emerging mutations sometime spawn new strains of influenza viruses as imminent epidemic or pandemic threats to human health (Mehle et al. 2012). Among different types of influenza viruses, type A is the most severe which further can be subtyped on the basis of antigenic differences of external glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) (Wright et al. 1995; Shaha et al. 2015). On the other hand, influenza B viruses are relatively less severe and develop infections among children (Abdullah Brooks et al. 2007; Zaman et al. 2009).

Slums with heavily dense population are one of the main reservoirs of influenza infections (Streatfield and Karar 2008). Previous study documented that Bangladesh has more than 9081 slums with very poor sanitation system and lowest economic condition (Islam et al. 2006). Different diseases appear all year-round in these areas with the increased morbidity and mortality rates (Khatun et al. 2012; Vaid et al. 2007). Many studies were performed about the prevalence of influenza infections in urban slums but the actual reasons for such diseases were poorly understood (Streatfield and Karar 2008; Abdullah Brooks et al. 2007; Rashid 2009).

In this study, we demonstrated the presumptive causes of influenza like illness (ILI) as well as the prevalence of influenza infections among mothers and children in slums of Dhaka city. We also tried to determine the association of influenza infections with different risk factors like age, gender, socio-economic status (annual income) and occupation of mothers.

Results

The slums of Dhaka city are such densely populated that it invites transmission of influenza from person to person leading to a probable complication of primary viral pneumonia and often secondary bacterial pneumonia which eventually could lead to death. Although potential vaccines have been developed the slum dwellers have a little access to those. Hence, prevention remains to be the only means of controlling such life threatening diseases. In this study we have determined the prevalence of influenza infections among nutritionally deprived children and mother of slum areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Analysis of physical conditions related to influenza like illness

Out of 540 participants with ILI in urban slums, 200 participants were mothers and 340 participants were children (male: 160 participants; female: 180 participants). The mean ages of the mothers and children were 31 and 4 years respectively. The occupations of participated mothers were most likely to be domestic workers, day labors, garment workers and housewives. The annual family incomes of all participants varied from US$ 800 to US$ 1500. About 87.9 % of the participants did not have knowledge about influenza infections and 80.5 % of the participants did not cover their noses during coughing and sneezing. Besides the availability of influenza vaccines, none of them were immunized which might be because of their lack of awareness. Additionally, almost 45.6 % of the participants had regular exposure to pet animals. Among the mothers, the percentages of washing hands before eating and after using toilet were 55.7 and 67.8 % (data not shown) respectively.

Association of influenza like illness (ILI) with different socio-demographic characteristics

The occurrence of ILI was observed high among the mothers of 36–40 years age range, while the mothers of 21–25 years age range were least affected (Fig. 1a). On the other hand, the number of children of 3 years were significantly prone to be affected by ILI which tend to decrease gradually with increasing age (Fig. 1b). Approximately, 64 % of the mothers with ILI were day laborer (Fig. 2a). With regards to the socio-economic status, 76 % of the participants were with very low income, less than 1000 US$ per annum (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 1

Relation of influenza like illness with ages of the respondents. a Age ranges of mothers; b Ages of children

Fig. 2

Association of influenza like illness with mothers’ occupation and family socio-economic status. a Mothers occupation; b Family socio-economic status

Detection of influenza viruses by rRT- PCR

Among 540 samples, 110 (20.4 %) samples tested positive for influenza viruses by rRT-PCR. Of that, 61 (55.5 %) samples (mothers: 11 and children: 50) were positive for influenza A virus and 49 (44.5 %) samples (mothers: 11 and children: 38) were positive for influenza B virus. Children were significantly infected by both influenza A (POR 2.96, 95 % CI 1.5038–5.8355, P: 0.002) and influenza B viruses (POR 2.16, 95 % CI 1.0787–4.3333, P: 0.03) as shown in Table 1a and b respectively. Additionally, among 340 ILI positive children, influenza infections had significant negative association with the increasing ages of children (POR 1.94, 95 % CI 1.1377–3.2947, P 0.01) and annual family incomes (POR: 2.05, 95 % CI 1.1361–3.7034, P 0.02) (Table 2). Of the influenza A virus positive samples 25 % were subtyped as H3N2 and 15 % were subtyped as H1N1.
Table 1

Prevalence of influenza A and B infection among ILI mother and children

Groups

IAV positive

IAV negative

POR (95 % CI)

P value

Prevalence of influenza A infection among ILI mother and children

Children (n = 340)

50

290

2.96 (1.5038–5.8355)*

0.002*

Mothers (n = 200)

11

189

Prevalence of influenza B infection among ILI mother and children

Children (n = 340)

38

302

2.16 (1.0787–4.3333)*

0.03*

Mothers (n = 200)

11

189

IAV influenza A virus, IBV influenza B virus, POR prevalence odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P provability

*Denotes statistically significant

Table 2

Prevalence of Influenza infections among ILI positive children according to socio-demographic characteristics

Factors

Influenza positive

Influenza negative

POR (95 % CI)

P value

Age (years)

≤03 (210)

64

146

1.94 (1.1377–3.2947)*

0.01*

>03 (130)

24

106

Gender

Male (160)

40

120

0.79 (0.4851–1.2727)

0.33

Female (180)

48

132

Socio-economic status (SES)a

≤1000 US$ (240)

71

169

2.05 (1.1361–3.7034)*

0.02*

>1000 US$ (100)

17

83

POR prevalence odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P provability

* Denotes statistically significant

aDenotes annual family income of the respective families

Discussion

To our knowledge there is no slum population based study to evaluate and compare occurrence of ILI in slum dwellers of different age group, sex and economic status. The burden of influenza associated illness was found to be dependent on hygiene condition. Most slums were damp and had open sewage connection even inside the temporary houses built with straw and bamboo.

Similar to the observations in the present study, numerous studies in other contexts also found a comprehensive relationship of getting ILI with very low income, lack of hand washing, ignorance about influenza infections, and dirty environmental conditions (Morens and Taubenberger 2010; Ram et al. 2015). However, the underlying reasons are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is any risk factor that modulates the prevalence of influenza infections among children of slum areas.

The occurrence of ILI was observed high among the mothers of 36–40 years age range and children of 3 years, which is consistent with other study (Iskander et al. 2009). One plausible reason behind it might be their compromised immune system as most of the participants were from very poor family and may not provide adequate nutrition required to maintain a sound health (Fig. 2) (Albers et al. 2013).

Real time RT-PCR is one of the latest techniques to detect viral gene directly from the samples using specified probes. In this study, we used this potential technique to identify influenza A and B viruses from slum dwellers. Among the ILI positive patients, 110 (20.4 %) patients tested positive for influenza viruses, of which approximately 55.5 and 44.5 % were specifically positive for influenza A and B viruses respectively. As we observed that children were three times more infected by influenza A viruses and two times more infected by influenza B viruses than mothers (Table 1). Besides being having compromised immune system children residing in slum are unattended as their parents are part time workers in different households. Children frequently visit the unhygienic areas of slums knowingly and/or unknowingly, this is because a child of 3 years is not so concerned about hygiene. On the other hand, getting unexpected exposure to infectious viruses may also be a vital cause of infection. This finding was in agreement with that of Paulo et al. (2010). A similar finding was also reported in rural Kenya where older sensible children were less likely to be infected (Breiman et al. 2015).

With regards to the socio-demographic characteristics, the prevalence of influenza infections is significantly higher in less than or equal of 3 years of age of children and very poor families of the slum areas. Studies in other contexts of the world have also documented similar findings (Yang et al. 2015; Iwasaki and Pillai 2014) but the actual fact has remained unclear. One plausible explanation is that the children are not conscious about personal hygiene and the sanitation systems of that areas as stated above. Other studies have also found that influenza viruses get a very favorable opportunity to infect a wide range of susceptible individuals in the slum area because of poor sanitation systems (Verreault et al. 2008). Furthermore, very poor income families might suffer from nutritional deficiency which is one of the key factors to combat influenza infections (Iskander et al. 2009). The findings of this study suggested that children were more vulnerable to influenza infections than mothers, although other risk factors were observed to uphold the infections. Therefore, the association between influenza infections and other immunomodulating risk factors needs to be demonstrated.

Conclusions

Being severely infectious agent, influenza viruses have a very high prevalence in the slum areas and children are the mostly affected. This study is important for two potential reasons. First, measuring the ILI status along with influenza viruses among poor slum dwellers who are deprived of the basic needs to live soundly. Second, importantly, children of 3 years of age were highly infected with influenza A and B viruses that might cause a high mortality rate and thus, the country may loss a large portion of young and healthy manpower in the near future. This study alerts public health authorities in Bangladesh about the need to upgrade living conditions and healthcare in the slum areas.

Methods

Sample collection and study population

Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected by trained laboratory technicians from 540 patients with influenza like illness who were nutritionally deprived and reported to physician during September–February, 2015 from different slums in Dhaka city with their written consent. All participants of this study had ILI with symptoms like cough, fever, running nose, sore throat, and/or headache. The study was approved by the ethical committee of Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh (reference number: DMC-MEU/ECC/2014/17). All the patients participated in this study were asked to fill a questionnaire, which includes the ages, socio-economic status, occupation, practice of hygienic condition, nutrition status of their family along with the environmental condition. For the collection of samples of nasal swab, a dry cotton tipped swab was inserted into the nostril parallel to the palate and left in place for a few seconds before being slowly withdrawn using a rotating motion. Specimens from both nostrils were obtained with the same swab. The tip of the swab was placed into a collection vial containing 2 ml of viral transport medium (VTM) and the applicator stick was then broken off. Samples were then placed at 4 °C immediately after collection and promptly transported to the laboratory.

Extraction of viral RNA and real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR)

Viral RNA was extracted from the collected samples using STRATEC Molecular RTP® Pathogen Kit (Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extraction was carried out in a Bio-Safety Level-II (BSL-II) cabinet. The viral nucleic acid was stored in aliquots at −80 °C until use. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using a one-step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, USA) with a 25 µl reaction mixture containing 5 μl of RNA template, 12.5 µl 2× buffer, 1 µl enhancer, 1 µl 50× taq polymerase enzyme, 0.5 µl 100× forward primer, 0.5 µl 100× reverse primer, 0.5 µl 100× probe, 4 µl nuclease free water. The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial reverse transcriptase step at 50 °C for 30 min, followed by a 5 min hold at 95 °C, and then 45 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 55 °C. Results were documented considering the relative cycle threshold (Ct) values with that of positive control. High Ct values (>38) were avoided. The primer sequences used for influenza A: Forward, GAC CRA TCC TGT CAC CTC TGA C; Reverse, AGG GCA TTY TGG ACA AAK CGT CTA; Probe, TGC AGT CCT CGC TCA CTG GGC ACG; Influenza B: Forward, TCC TCA AYT CAC TCT TCG AGC G; Reverse, CGG TGC TCT TGA CCA AAT TGG; Probe, CCA ATT CGA GCA GCT GAA ACT GCG GTG; RnaseP: Forward, AGA TTT GGA CCT GCG AGC G; Reverse, GAG CGG CTG TCT CCA CAA GT; Probe, TTC TGA CCT GAA GGC TCT GCG CG.

Statistical analysis of the obtained data

Data were analyzed with MedCalc v11.3.0.0; the association of influenza infections with risk factors was analyzed by estimating prevalence odds ratios (POR). Statistical significance was assessed by calculating 95 % confidence interval (CI). Chi square test was also performed to analyze the level of significance (P < 0.05).

Abbreviations

SES: 

socio-economic status

ILI: 

influenza like illness

rRT-PCR: 

real-time reverse transcriptase PCR

IAV: 

influenza A virus

IBV: 

influenza B virus

HA: 

hemagglutinin

NA: 

neuraminidase

VTM: 

viral transport medium

POR: 

prevalence odds ratio

CI: 

confidence interval

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SRR supervised the study group, involved in designing the study and prepared the manuscript; MFA was involved in designing the project and manuscript revision; MAI made substantial contributions during sample collection, laboratory works and data analysis; MMR was involved in conception and design, drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content; All author have approved the final manuscript to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Higher Education Quality Enhancement Project (HEQEP), University Grant Commission (UGC), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. The authors are thankful to Mr. Modhusudon Shaha for his assistance during some of the laboratory works.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, University of Dhaka
(2)
Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University
(3)
Department of Microbiology, Jagannath University

References

  1. Abdullah Brooks W, Terebuh P, Bridges C, Klimov A, Goswami D, Sharmeen AT, Azim T, Erdman D, Hall H, Luby S, Breiman RF (2007) Influenza A and B infection in children in urban slum, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis 13(10):1507–1508. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1310.070368 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers R, Bourdet-Sicard R, Braun D, Calder PC, Herz U, Lambert C, Lenoir-Wijnkoop I, Meheust A, Ouwehand A, Phothirath P, Sako T, Salminen S, Siemensma A, van Loveren H, Sack U (2013) Monitoring immune modulation by nutrition in the general population: identifying and substantiating effects on human health. Br J Nutr 110(Suppl 2):S1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114513001505 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Belshe RB, Edwards KM, Vesikari T, Black SV, Walker RE, Hultquist M, Kemble G, Connor EM (2007) Live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine in infants and young children. N Engl J Med 356(7):685–696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa065368 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhuiyan MU, Luby SP, Alamgir NI, Homaira N, Mamun AA, Khan JA, Abedin J, Sturm-Ramirez K, Gurley ES, Zaman RU, Alamgir AS, Rahman M, Widdowson MA, Azziz-Baumgartner E (2014) Economic burden of influenza-associated hospitalizations and outpatient visits in Bangladesh during 2010. Influ Other Respir Viruses 8(4):406–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12254 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Breiman RF, Cosmas L, Njenga MK, Williamson J, Mott JA, Katz MA, Erdman DD, Schneider E, Oberste MS, Neatherlin JC, Njuguna H, Ondar DM, Odero K, Okoth GO, Olack B, Wamola N, Montgomery JM, Fields BS, Feikin DR (2015) Severe acute respiratory infection in children in a densely populated urban slum in Kenya, 2007–2011. BMC Infect Dis 15(95):495. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0827-x Google Scholar
  6. Elton D, Simpson-Holley M, Archer K, Medcalf L, Hallam R, McCauley J, Digard P (2001) Interaction of the influenza virus nucleoprotein with the cellular CRM1-mediated nuclear export pathway. J Virol 75(1):408–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.1.408-419.2001 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedson DS (2009) Meeting the challenge of influenza pandemic preparedness in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 15(3):365–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1503.080857 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Iskander M, Kesson A, Dwyer D, Rost L, Pym M, Wang H, McCaskill M, Booy R (2009) The burden of influenza in children under 5 years admitted to the Children’s Hospital at Westmead in the winter of 2006. J Paediatr Child Health 45(12):698–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01597.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Islam N, Mahbub AQM, Nazem NI, Lance P, Angeles G (2006) Slums of urban Bangladesh: mapping and census 2005. Centre for Urban Studies, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  10. Iwasaki A, Pillai PS (2014) Innate immunity to influenza virus infection. Nat Rev Immunol 14(5):315–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3665 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kamlangdee A, Kingstad-Bakke B, Anderson TK, Goldberg TL, Osorio JE (2014) Broad protection against avian influenza virus by using a modified vaccinia Ankara virus expressing a mosaic hemagglutinin gene. J Virol 88(22):13300–13309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01532-14 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Khatun F, Rasheed S, Moran AC, Alam AM, Shomik MS, Sultana M, Choudhury N, Iqbal M, Bhuiya A (2012) Causes of neonatal and maternal deaths in Dhaka slums: implications for service delivery. BMC Public Health 12:84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-84 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Koul PA, Broor S, Saha S, Barnes J, Smith C, Shaw M, Chadha M, Lal RB (2014) Differences in influenza seasonality by latitude, northern India. Emerg Infect Dis 20(10):1723–1726. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2010.140431 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mehle A, Dugan VG, Taubenberger JK, Doudna JA (2012) Reassortment and mutation of the avian influenza virus polymerase PA subunit overcome species barriers. J Virol 86(3):1750–1757. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06203-11 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Morens DM, Taubenberger JK (2010) Historical thoughts on influenza viral ecosystems, or behold a pale horse, dead dogs, failing fowl, and sick swine. Influ Other Respir Viruses 4(6):327–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2010.00148.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Nasreen S, Luby SP, Brooks WA, Homaira N, Al Mamun A, Bhuiyan MU, Rahman M, Ahmed D, Abedin J, Alamgir AS, Fry AM, Streatfield PK, Rahman A, Bresee J, Widdowson MA, Azziz-Baumgartner E (2014) Population-based incidence of severe acute respiratory virus infections among children aged <5 years in rural Bangladesh, June–October 2010. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089978 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Obayashi E, Yoshida H, Kawai F, Shibayama N, Kawaguchi A, Nagata K, Tame JR, Park SY (2008) The structural basis for an essential subunit interaction in influenza virus RNA polymerase. Nature 454(7208):1127–1131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07225 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Oshitani H, Kamigaki T, Suzuki A (2008) Major issues and challenges of influenza pandemic preparedness in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 14(6):875–880. doi:https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1406.070839 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ou CQ, Song YF, Yang J, Chau PY, Yang L, Chen PY, Wong CM (2013) Excess winter mortality and cold temperatures in a subtropical city, Guangzhou, China. PLoS One 8(10):e77150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077150 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Paulo AC, Correia-Neves M, Domingos T, Murta AG, Pedrosa J (2010) Influenza infectious dose may explain the high mortality of the second and third wave of 1918–1919 influenza pandemic. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011655 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ram PK, DiVita MA, Khatun EJK, Islam M, Krytus K, Cercone E, Sohel BM, Ahmed M, Rahman AM, Rahman M, Yu J, Brooks WA, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Fry AM, Luby SP (2015) Impact of intensive handwashing promotion on secondary household influenza-like illness in rural Bangladesh: findings from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0125200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125200 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rashid SF (2009) Strategies to reduce exclusion among populations living in urban slum settlements in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 27(4):574–586View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaha M, Islam MA, Islam ABMMK, Ahmed F, Rahman MM, Rahman SR (2015) Prediction of new conserved epitopes in protein 3D model to neutralize influenza A virus strain H3N2 Circulating in Bangladesh. Int J Curr Res Chem Pharm Sci 2(3):11Google Scholar
  24. Streatfield PK, Karar ZA (2008) Population challenges for Bangladesh in the coming decades. J Health Popul Nutr 26(3):261–272Google Scholar
  25. Sydnor ER, Perl TM (2011) Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings. Clin Microbiol Rev 24(1):141–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00027-10 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Vaid A, Mammen A, Primrose B, Kang G (2007) Infant mortality in an urban slum. Indian J Pediatr 74(5):449–453View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Verreault D, Moineau S, Duchaine C (2008) Methods for sampling of airborne viruses. MMBR 72(3):413–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00002-08 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Weerasinghe DP, MacIntyre CR, Rubin GL (2002) Seasonality of coronary artery deaths in New South Wales. Australia. Heart 88(1):30–34View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodhouse PR, Khaw KT, Plummer M, Foley A, Meade TW (1994) Seasonal variations of plasma fibrinogen and factor VII activity in the elderly: winter infections and death from cardiovascular disease. Lancet 343(8895):435–439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wright KE, Wilson GA, Novosad D, Dimock C, Tan D, Weber JM (1995) Typing and subtyping of influenza viruses in clinical samples by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 33(5):1180–1184Google Scholar
  31. Yang L, Chan KH, Suen LK, Chan KP, Wang X, Cao P, He D, Peiris JS, Wong CM (2015) Age-specific epidemic waves of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in a subtropical city. Sci Rep 5:10390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10390 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yusuf K, Soraisham AS, Fonseca K (2007) Fatal influenza B virus pneumonia in a preterm neonate: case report and review of the literature. J Perinatol 27(10):623–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211802 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zaman RU, Alamgir AS, Rahman M, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Gurley ES, Sharker MA, Brooks WA, Azim T, Fry AM, Lindstrom S, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Garten RJ, Hossain MJ, Khan SU, Faruque LI, Ameer SS, Klimov AI, Luby SP (2009) Influenza in outpatient ILI case-patients in national hospital-based surveillance, Bangladesh, 2007–2008. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008452 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016