Open Access

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocal in protein levels as an acute appendicitis biomarker in children

  • Unal Bakal1,
  • Mehmet Saraç1,
  • Harun Ciftci2,
  • Tugay Tartar1,
  • Esra Kocdemir3,
  • Suleyman Aydin4Email author and
  • Ahmet Kazez1
SpringerPlus20165:193

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1853-x

Received: 7 August 2015

Accepted: 15 February 2016

Published: 27 February 2016

Abstract

Objective

Appendicitis is very commonly encountered in emergency clinics. There is an urgent need for early and accurate predictive biomarkers of appendicitis in order to save lives, because currently-available biomarkers are imprecise and their delayed response impairs the ability of emergency doctors and pediatric surgeons to provide timely and potentially effective therapies. This study was performed to determine whether changes in the blood levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) can help to diagnose acute appendicitis in children and distinguish acute appendicitis from abdominal pain.

Methods

Sixty children were enrolled and divided into three groups, with 20 patients per group: Group 1 (patients with appendicitis), Group 2 (patients with abdominal pain) and Group 3 (control). Blood NGAL levels were determined by ELISA.

Results

The basal average serum NGAL levels were 8.2 ng/ml for Group 1, 3.9 ng/ml for Group 2, and 3.3 ng/ml for Group 3. Twenty-four and 72 h after surgery the levels were 5.1 and 2.8 ng/ml, respectively, in Group 1, 2.9 and 2.8 ng/ml in Group 2, and 2.6, 2.7 ng/ml in Group 3. Setting the cut-off point to 7 generated an area under the receiving operating curve (ROC) curve at 95 % confidence interval with 77.3 % sensitivity and 97.4 % specificity.

Conclusion

These data indicate a significant difference in NGAL values between basal and postoperative measurements in appendicitis patients (p < 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that NGAL is a promising novel biomarker for the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis from abdominal pain.

Keywords

Lipocalin Acute appendicitis Biomarker Pediatric surgeon

Background

Appendectomy is the most commonly-performed emergency operation in pediatric surgery clinics. The clinical signs of appendicitis arise from an inflammatory process that begins as a luminal obstruction and proceeds to abdominal pain. Diagnosis is based on clinical findings and there is still no definitive laboratory diagnosis. Clinical signs of appendicitis can be confused with many diseases associated with abdominal pain (Alvarado 1986; Apak et al. 2005; Brănescu et al. 2012; Nance et al. 2000; Rodriguez-Sanjuan et al. 1999).

Early detection of appendicitis is crucial, as prompt treatment leads to better patient outcomes and fewer complications. Currently, the Alvarado scoring system is used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and is calculated out of a total of 10 points on the basis of symptoms, clinical findings, leukocyte count and radiological findings. However, the negative laparotomy rate is low when the score on this system is greater than 7. Observation and/or additional definite laboratory evaluation are needed for scores of 5–6 (Alvarado 1986). Clinicians still encounter problems such as perforation, negative appendectomy, mortality, morbidity, and long hospital stays in patients with acute appendicitis (Flum and Koepsell 2002).

We hypothesized that there could be a link between appendicitis and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) = lipocalin 2 (LCN2) = siderocalin because appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix: the inflamed appendix becomes infected with intestinal bacteria. Neutrophils are the primary white blood cells that respond to a bacterial infection. NGAL is mainly expressed by neutrophils and at low levels by the kidney, prostate, and epithelia of the respiratory and alimentary tracts and appendix (Bartsch et al. 1995; Cowland and Borregaard 1997; Leelawat et al. 2011; Nielsen et al. 1996). Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that NGAL could be involved in the pathophysiology of chronic renal diseases such as polycystic kidney disease and glomerulonephritis. It also appears to be up regulated in cells under “stress”, e.g. from infection, inflammation, ischemia or neoplastic transformation. If the infected appendix causes an increment of neutrophils, more NGAL will be secreted into the blood stream. Theoretically, therefore, increased plasma NGAL might be an indicator of acute appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to assess whether serum NGAL levels could be useful for diagnosing acute appendicitis and could distinguish acute appendicitis from abdominal pain.

Methods

The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Firat University Faculty of Medicine approved our study (date: 02/23/2012, session #7). A total of 60 children who were treated in the Department of Pediatric Surgery from December 2012 to 2014 were included in our study. The patients were divided into three groups of 20 each. Alvarado scores were noted for each subject. Patients were not separated on the basis of age or gender. Parents of all patients in the study were informed prior to the study and informed consent was obtained from them. The age and cognitive skills of the children prevented them from using a visual analog scale to evaluate their appetite, so their parents stated whether the children had a normal appetite or loss of appetite. Patients with congenital anomalies and/or life-threatening conditions and patients who had had an appendectomy were excluded from the study. The groups were divided as follows: Group 1: patients diagnosed with appendicitis due to undergo appendectomy; Group 2: patients with abdominal pain but no appendicitis; Group 3: controls (healthy children who had tested negative for cryptorchidism, inguinal hernia, phimosis and vulvar fusion at the pediatric surgery department, and had no known diseases). Blood samples were obtained at time zero (preoperative, basal), 24 h postoperative and 72 h postoperative in Group 1. Blood samples were also obtained from Groups 2 and 3 at the corresponding times by a previously published method (Aydin 2015). Patients with acute appendicitis are usually admitted to our hospital in the afternoon; thus, blood samples in Groups 2 and 3 were obtained during the same time period (at about 3:00 pm) to avoid any effects of circadian rhythm. The samples were stored at −80 °C pending analysis. The WBC count and neutrophil percentage were measured with an ABX Pentra DX SPS Evolution device (Horiba, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was measured with a VacuplusESR-120 Fully Automated ESR analyzer, and the CRP level was measured with a Siemens Dade Behring BN II Nephelometer.

Measurement of serum NGAL levels

Serum NGAL levels were measured by ELISA using human lipocalin-2/NGAL ELISA kits (BioVendor®, Brno, Czech Rep.). Diluted serum samples were added to the plates coated with NGAL antibodies. The inter-assay value (CV) was less than 10 % while the intra-assay value was 5 %. After the initial incubation for 4 h at room temperature, secondary antibody was added and incubated for an additional hour. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 M sulfuric acid. Absorbances were measured at 450 nm. The NGAL concentrations in each sample were determined from a standard curve (Mishra et al. 2005). The results were interpreted double-blindly by an investigator who did not know the patients’ diagnoses.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS 21® statistical software was used for statistical analysis. The initial NGAL values, Alvarado appendicitis scores, CRP, WBC count and percentage, and ESR were compared between the groups by both ROC curves and Tukey HSD tests. The NGAL values of Group 1 patients taken prior to the surgery, 24 h after the surgery and at the time of discharge were compared using the Tukey HSD test. The area under the ROC curve was calculated using SPSS software. The best cut-off point was chosen by comparing sensitivity and specificity at various levels. A p value of less than 0.05 was the criterion of statistical significance.

Results

The average age of the study population (all groups) was 10.4 (6–16) years. Ten patients from Group 1 who underwent surgery had acute appendicitis, nine had phlegmonous appendicitis and one had perforated appendicitis. All those types of appendicitis were confirmed by a pathologist using surgically removed specimens. Five patients from Group 2 had acute gastroenteritis, four had mesenteric lymphadenitis, four had cystitis, three had constipation, and one had acute gastritis, while three patients were diagnosed with nonspecific abdominal pain. Patients from Group 3 had no infectious or inflammatorily-mediated pathologies.

The mean NGAL values obtained at admission (basal) were: 8.6 ng/ml in Group 1, 3.9 ng/ml in Group 2 and 3.3 ng/ml in Group 3. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1). The mean NGAL values obtained at 24 h were: 5.1 ng/ml in Group 1, 2.9 ng/ml in Group 2 and 2.8 ng/ml in Group 3. Those obtained at 72 h were: 2.8 ng/ml in Group 1, 2.6 ng/ml in Group 2 and 2.7 ng/ml in Group 3.
Fig. 1

Serum NGAL levels at basal (T1), 24 h (T2) and 72 h (T3) in patients with acute appendicitis, those with abdominal pain, and controls. Serum NGAL values were significantly higher (*p < 0.05) between acute appendicitis and abdominal pain; between acute appendicitis and control; between abdominal pain and control

Although the preoperative and postoperative NGAL values were significantly different (p < 0.05), there was no significant difference between the NGAL values at 24 h postoperative and at discharge (p > 0.05) (Fig. 1).

The mean serum NGAL values of the appendicitis patients from Group 1 were the highest. Those of patients with abdominal pain from the second group were lower than the first group but significantly higher than the third (control) group. There were significant correlations between Group 1 and the other groups only in terms of CRP, WBC, neutrophil percentage and ESR. There was no such correlation between Groups 2 and 3 (Table 1). In the acute appendicitis patients there was a positive correlation between NGAL level and neutrophil count (r = 0.408, p = 0.074). There were also correlations in the control group between NGAL and WBC count (r = 0.308, p = 0.187), and NGAL and neutrophil percentage (r = 0.481, p = 0.032).
Table 1

Alteration of CRP, WBC count, neutrophil percentage and ESR in the groups

 

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

CRP (mg/dl)

7.1a,b

<3c

<3

WBC(K/μl)

15.9a, b

1.5c

6.8

Neutrophils (%)

88.2a, b

59.9c

57.0

Sedimentation rate (mm/h)

24.0a, b

12.4c

12.2

CRP, WBC count, neutrophil percentage and ESR were significantly higher (ap < 0.05) in ap < 0.05 between groups 1 and 2

b p < 0.05 between groups 1 and 3

c p < 0.05 between groups 2 and 3

When the Alvarado scores were compared with the serum NGAL levels, we found that setting the cut-off point to 7 resulted in an area under the ROC curve giving, at 95 % confidence intervals, 77.3 % sensitivity and 97.4 % specificity. With the cut-off value set to 9, the sensitivity was 100 % and the specificity 55 % (Fig. 2). On the other hand, at a cutoff value of 0.13 mg/dl for serum CRP value sensitivity was 90 %, and the specificity 65 %.
Fig. 2

The sensitivity and specificity percentages of preoperative serum NGAL for detecting appendicitis in children. The area under the ROC curve, NGAL sensitivity of 77.3 % and specificity of 97.4 %, were identified when the Alvarado score was set to a cut-off point of “7”

Discussion

Abdominal pain in children is one of the most common reasons they are brought to emergency services. The correct identification of appendicitis depends on a methodical differential diagnosis and patient assessment. If the condition is not identified early and accurately, patients are at risk for perforation and development of peritonitis and/or an abscess. To diagnose appendicitis, laboratory findings to support a clinical diagnosis could be valuable. General practitioners and pediatricians serving in the emergency services can find it difficult to diagnose appendicitis without laboratory tests owing to limited clinical experience (Saraç et al. 2013). Computed tomography has a high radiation risk so it is not suited to frequent use, although it has high sensitivity and specificity on appendicitis. Therefore, in order to help in diagnosing appendicitis, scoring systems have been developed. The Alvarado scoring system was developed in 1986 and is still used in diagnosing appendicitis (Alvarado 1986), but when used alone it might not be reliable. Appendicitis-like abdominal pain in children can be confused with signs and symptoms of many other diseases. The differential diagnosis of diseases such as acute gastroenteritis, constipation, urinary tract infections, mesenteric lymphadenitis and pelvic inflammatory disease might not be straightforward (Lau et el. 1987; Rothrock et al. 1991). However, since there is no single reliable diagnostic method, diagnosis is attempted by interpreting findings from more than one parameter.

Despite all the advances, with many laboratory studies conducted to achieve a better diagnosis, appendicitis is still a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. Although many studies have focused on 5-HIAA, CRP, procalcitonin, interleukins, leptin and NUCB2/nesfatin-1, lipopolysaccharide binding protein, etc., appendicitis is still difficult to diagnose at an early stage with such laboratory tests (Rodriguez-Sanjuan et al. 1999; Apak et al. 2005; Mentesa et al. 2009; Brănescu et al. 2012; Bakal et al. 2015). Further research is needed to develop laboratory diagnostic methods to reduce negative laparotomy rates and the incidence of perforated appendicitis.

Measurement of specific metabolites or an enzyme in serum can serve as identifiers of inflammation in specific organs. NGAL is a 25 kDa protein from the lipocalin family, which is secreted from inflammatory cells and tissues as a result of neutrophil activation (Al-Ismaili et al. 2011; Petrovic et al. 2013). In particular, it serves as an inflammatory biomarker with levels elevated in kidney and liver disorders, tumors and inflammatory diseases of the colon. Tissue NGAL levels are also reportedly increased in appendicitis; therefore, in our study, we hypothesized that serum NGAL levels are increased in appendicitis cases (Nielsen et al. 1996; Cowland and Borregaard 1997).

In this study, NGAL assays enabled us to distinguish clinically between patients who underwent appendectomy and those with nonspecific abdominal pain who had an appendicitis-like pathology and were being closely monitored owing to suspected appendicitis. Although immunohistochemical staining studies have demonstrated an increased presence of NGAL at the tissue level in appendicitis, no studies have investigated serum NGAL levels in appendicitis. Serum NGAL levels can increase for different reasons; however, we have shown here that in appendicitis patients whose diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically, serum NGAL levels are increased secondary to appendicitis.

The higher NGAL levels in patients with non-appendicitis-related abdominal pain than the control group could be attributed to temporary inflammation of the colonic epithelium. However, the mean NGAL value in the non-specific abdominal pain group was about half the value observed in the appendicitis group; though twice as high as the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant.

Parameters such as CRP, WBC count, neutrophil percentage and ESR that are used to define appendicitis were significantly higher in Group 1 than the other two groups, but those values were not adequate for distinguishing between Groups 2 and 3. Unlike the above-mentioned parameters, the difference in NGAL values was significant among all three groups. Serum NGAL levels in the appendicitis group were three times higher than in the control group and this difference was statistically significant.

When serum NGAL levels in the appendicitis group were compared there was a significant difference between preoperative levels and the levels measured 24 h postoperatively and at discharge, but there was no significant difference between the 24 h postoperative and discharge values. The NGAL levels after appendectomy decreased to the level of the control group, which suggests that the elevation was due to appendicitis.

The NGAL levels were compared with the Alvarado score, setting the cut-off value to 7, which estimated the diagnosis of appendicitis an area under the ROC curve, with a 95 % confidence interval, to have 77.3 % sensitivity and 97.4 % specificity. At this cut-off point the positive predictive value for appendicitis was 94 %, while the negative predictive value was 88 %.

Conclusions

Therefore, on the basis of our data, it seems that NGAL can be used as a laboratory parameter to differentiate appendicitis from nonspecific abdominal pain. However, in order to determine normal limit values for NGAL, a large clinical study with appendicitis or non- appendicitis patients is needed.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

UB and MS clinical data collection, patients’ treatment, follow-up, and helped to draft the manuscript, HA, EK and TT participated in the design of the study and carried out the graphic design of Figures, AK and SA wrote and reviewed the manuscript, and they were the guarantor of the integrity of the study. All authors participated in the definition of intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the FÜBAP (Firat University Research Fund) coordinator ship (Project No: TF.12.35-2012) for financial support. We also thank Dr. Nurhan Halisdemir and Dr. Emrah Firat for statistical analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Firat University
(2)
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ahievran University
(3)
Kovancilar State Hospital
(4)
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (Firat Hormones Research Groups), School of Medicine, Firat University

References

  1. Al-Ismaili Z, Palijan A, Zappitelli M (2011) Biomarkers of acute kidney injury in children: discovery, evaluation, and clinical application. Pediatr Nephrol 26:29–40View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarado A (1986) A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 15:557–564View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Apak S, Kazez A, Ozel SK, Ustundag B, Akpolat N, Kizirgil A (2005) Spot urine 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid levels in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1436–1439View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Aydin S (2015) A short history, principles, and types of ELISA, and our laboratory experience with peptide/protein analyses using ELISA. Peptides 72:4–15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakal U, Saraç M, Ciftci H, Tartar T, Ahmet Kazez A, Aydin S (2015) Leptin and NUCB2/Nesfatin-1 in Acute Appendicitis. Int J Clin Med 6:919–928View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartsch S, Tschesche H (1995) Cloning and expression of human neutrophil lipocalin cDNA derived from bone marrow and ovarian cancer cells. FEBS Lett 357:255–259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brănescu C, Şerban D, Şavlovschi C, Dascalu AM, Kraft A (2012) Lipopolysaccharide binding protein (L.B.P.) an inflammatory marker of prognosis in the acute appendicitis. J Med Jife 15:342–347Google Scholar
  8. Cowland JB, Borregaard N (1997) Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans. Genomics 45:17–23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Flum DR (2002) Koepsell T (1987) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nation wide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Saraç M, Bakal Ü, Tartar T, Kazez, A (2014) The role of the doctors in perforated appendicitis. XXXIth National Congress of Turkish Association of Pediatric Surgeons. Oct 30–Nov 2, Eskişehir, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  11. Lau WY, Fan ST, Yip WC, Chu KW, Yiu TF, Yeung C et al (1987) Acute appendicitis in children. Aust NZ J Surg 57:927–931View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Leelawat K, Narong S, Wannaprasert J, Leelawat S (2011) Serum NGAL to clinically distinguish cholangiocarcinoma from benign biliary tract diseases. Int J Hepatol. doi:https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/873548 Google Scholar
  13. Mentesa O, Eryılmaz M, Harlaka A, Yaman H, Yigit T, Ongoru O et al (2009) The importance of urine 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid levels in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 27:409–412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mishra J, Dent C, Tarabishi R, Mitsnefes MM, Ma Q, Kelly C et al (2005) Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. Lancet 365:1231–1238View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Nance ML, Adamson WT, Hedrick HL (2000) Appendicitis in the young child: a continuing diagnostic challenge. Pediatr Emerg Care 16:160–162View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen BS, Borregaard N, Bundgaard JR, Timshel S, Sehested M, Kjeldsen L (1996) Induction of NGAL synthesis in epithelial cells of human colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 38:414–420View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Petrovic S, Bogavac-Stanojevic N, Peco-Antic A, Ivanısevic I, Kotur-Stevujevic J, Paripovic D et al (2013) Clinical application neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule-1 as indicators of inflammation persistence and acute kidney injury in children with urinary tract infection. Biomed Res Int. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/947157 Google Scholar
  18. Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC, Martin-Parra JI, Seco I, Garcia-Castrillo L, Naranjo A (1999) C-reactive protein and leukocyte in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1325–1329View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothrock SG, Skeoch G, Rush JJ, Johnson NE (1991) Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. Ann Emerg Med 20:45–50View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bakal et al. 2016