Open Access

Metabolic inhibition of meloxicam by specific CYP2C9 inhibitors in Cunninghamella blakesleeana NCIM 687: in silico and in vitro studies


Received: 12 June 2015

Accepted: 12 February 2016

Published: 24 February 2016


Specific inhibitors of Cytochrome P4502C9 enzyme (CYP2C9) viz. clopidogrel, fenofibrate fluvoxamine and sertraline at concentration of 50, 100, 150 and 200 µM were employed to investigate the nature of enzyme involved in bioconversion of meloxicam to its main metabolite 5-OH methyl meloxicam by Cunninghamella blakesleeana. Virtual screening for interaction of specific CYP2C9 inhibitors with human CYP2C9 enzyme was performed by molecular docking using Auto dock vina 4.2 version. The in silico studies were further substantiated by in vitro studies, which indicated fenofibrate to be a potent inhibitor of CYP2C9 enzyme followed by sertraline, clopidogrel and fluvoxamine, respectively. Two-stage fermentation protocol was followed to study metabolism of meloxicam and its inhibition by different CYP2C9 inhibitors. Meloxicam metabolites were identified using HPLC, LC–MS analysis and based on previous reports, as 5-OH methyl meloxicam (M1), 5-carboxy meloxicam (M2) and an unidentified metabolite (M3). All the inhibitors tested in the study showed a clear concentration dependent inhibition of meloxicam metabolism. The results suggest that the enzymes involved in metabolism of meloxicam in C. blakesleeana are akin to mammalian metabolism. Hence, C. blakesleeana can be used as a model organism in studying drug interactions and also in predicting mammalian drug metabolism.


CYP2C9 inhibitors Cunninghamella blakesleeana Drug interaction In silico studies LC–MS Meloxicam


Drug–drug interaction is a condition where one drug affects the activity of the other by increasing or decreasing its activity. These interactions are seen in patients suffering from chronic ailments such as congestive heart failure, rheumatic diseases, hypertension, cancer, and human immunodeficiency which require multiple drug therapy and may result in adverse drug interactions manifested as a loss in drug efficacy (Doucet et al. 2002). Co-administration of ketoconazole and terfenadine was reported to cause potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (Manahan et al. 1990) and an interaction between sorivudine and fluorouracil also resulted in fatal toxicity (Watabe 1996; Sokuda et al. 1997). Cytochrome enzymes play a major role in metabolizing drugs and the activity of this group of enzymes or a single CYP can determine patient’s response to drug therapy. Therefore, modulation of the activity of CYPs by a given drug is a critical issue for the assessing the safety and efficacy of a drug. Inhibition of CYP can increase systemic exposure leading to severe toxic side effects of the drug or another concomitantly given medication that is metabolized by the respective CYP(s) (Romet et al. 1994; Wandel et al. 1998). Cardiac toxicity caused by co-administering the antihistamine terfenadine with the antifungal ketoconazole or the antibiotic erythromycin is an example whereby inhibition of CYP 3A4 results in elevated terfenadine levels, resulting in prolongation of the QTc interval (Venkatakrishna et al. 2000). Similarly, the increased bleeding in patients on warfarin therapy has been attributed to inhibition of its metabolism (Chan 1998).

Progress in CYP enzymology and biochemistry in the recent past suggests that, the drug interactions are based on enzyme inhibition. This aspect can be further investigated using in vitro techniques with microsomes, expressed enzymes, or cell systems (Pichard et al. 1990; Von Moltke et al. 1994). An understanding of the drug-metabolizing enzymes role in the clearance of compounds and of drug–drug interactions caused by co-administered medications is an essential component of both the drug discovery process and its therapeutics. Currently variety of tools are available to assess the potential of a drug in inhibiting different P450 enzymes invitro which include human liver tissue, cDNA expressed P450 enzymes, and specific probe substrates. Among them, human liver microsomal preparations are method of choice. The utility of tissues from individual donors for inhibition of enzyme selective studies is limited by sufficiency of catalytic activity present in the tissue. Alternately, when a specific enzyme is to be investigated, recombinant P450s can be used. The most preferred test systems are microsomes and recombinant p450 enzymes as they are readily available than human hepatocytes and p450 kinetic measurements are not confounded with other metabolic processes or cellular uptake. A major disadvantage of microsomes or recombinant enzymes is that they do not represent the true physiological environment. (e.g., not all Phase II enzymes are present) if that is of interest to study. These processes are also associated with high cost.

Microorganisms and their enzymes have proved to be versatile biocatalysts and are involved in the transformation of complex organic materials to produce bioactive compounds and some of them have the potential to metabolise or degrade the desired compounds. This process is simple, hazard free, minimizes the problems of racemization, isomerization, epimerization and rearrangement that generally occur during chemical process, renewable or recycled many times, economical and ecofriendly. Most of the fungal cultures were employed in biotransformation of drugs especially the fungus belonging to the genus Cunninghamella is well documented, also as a model of mammalian biotransformation (Zhang et al. 2006; Lisowska et al. 2006). The advantages of microbial systems as an in vitro model for drug biotransformation include its low cost, ease of handling, scale up capacity and its potential to reduce the use of animals (Pupo et al. 2007). Further it is an efficient and environmentally friendly process.

Meloxicam, the anti-inflammatory drug used for the treatment of rheumatic disease is mainly metabolized to 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite that is further converted to a 5-carboxy metabolite (Schmid et al. 1995) and to other derivatives. The 5-hydroxylation of meloxicam is predominantly catalyzed by CYP2C9 and with a minor contribution of CYP3A4 (Chesne et al. 1998). Any medication inhibiting CYP2C9 can potentially block the conversion of meloxicam into its metabolites. 5-OH methyl meloxicam was found to be the major metabolite in mammals and the microbes studied so far (Busch et al. 1998; Prasad et al. 2009a).

In our earlier studies, three major metabolites of meloxicam viz. 5-OH methyl meloxicam (M1), 5-carboxy meloxicam (M2) and an unidentified metabolite (M3) were recorded employing C. blakesleeana as a model organism (Prasad et al. 1998). In the present investigation, we report the inhibition of the enzyme involved in the bioconversion of meloxicam to 5-OH methyl meloxicam using specific CYP2C9 inhibitors viz. clopidogrel, fenofibrate, fluoxamine and sertraline in C. blakesleeana.

Results and discussion

In silico studies

The CYP2C9 (receptor) 3D structure with PDB I.D 1OG2 was obtained from PDB data base and the ligands from PubChem and are converted to 3D PDB files. After preparing receptor (CYP2C9) and 4 ligands (clopidogrel, fenofibrate, sertraline and fluvoxamine), each ligand individually was subjected to docking with human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 enzyme (receptor) and the docking was found to be successful based on the evident formation of complexes of CYP2C9 enzyme with specific human CYP2C9 enzyme inhibitors. The hydrogen bond interactions, binding energy, bond length, RMSD, active site residues and orientation of the docked compound within the active site were visualized using PyMOL software. All the test compounds screened showed best fit RMSD value of 0.000, indicating statistically significant interaction. The binding energies were found to be, −7.8, −7.3, −6.9 and −6.2 kcal mol−1 for fenofibrate, sertraline, clopidogrel, and fluvoxamine, respectively (Table 1). The negative and low value of ΔG indicated a strong favorable bonding between CYP2C9 enzyme and the ligands, suggesting that the bound ligand was in its most favorable conformations.
Table 1

Ligands docked to crystal structure of human cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 (PDB: Code 10G2)

Ligand name

Binding energy (kcal/mol)

Number of hydrogen bonds

Distance (Å)

Residues involved in hydrogen bond

Atom of compound


















GLN-214/1HE2 ASN-217/1HD2




Hydrophobic interactions

Fenofibrate showed binding energy of −7.8 which was found to be higher as compared to other inhibitors tested with one hydrogen bond interacting with CYP2C9 enzyme in the complex at O-24 position of the ligand. The residue involved in this interaction was ASN-217. Sertraline was found to be potent inhibitor of CYP2C9 next only to fenofibrate with binding energy of 7.3 kcal/mol. Interestingly, sertraline could not form any hydrogen bonding with receptor (CYP2C9) indicating the interaction to be hydrophobic. The surrounding amino acids Arg-433, Thr-301, Val-113 may be involved in forming hydrophobic interactions with sertraline.

Clopidogrel showed binding energy of −6.9 kcal/mol, forming one hydrogen bond with the receptor and was less potent as compared to fenofibrate and sertraline. The residue involved in forming hydrogen bonding was identified as ARG-97. Further, clopidogrel was involved in forming hydrogen bonding with oxygen at position O-20.

Even though, fluvoxamine showed two hydrogen bonds with the receptor with a bonding energy of −6.2, which was least potent as compared to other inhibitors tested. GLN-214 and ASN-217 are the two aminoacid residues that are involved in forming hydrogen bonds. The oxygen (O-21) of the ligand was involved in the bonding.

The details of binding energies, number of hydrogen bonds formed and catalytic site residues involved in protein–ligand complex of CYP2C9 with different ligands are depicted in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Virtual screening for interaction of specific CYP29 inhibitors (ad) clopidogrel, Fenofibrate, fluvoxamine, sertraline with human CYP2C9 (PDB code: 1OG2) enzyme by molecular docking

In vitro studies

In the present investigation, three metabolites of meloxicam M1, M2 and M3 employing C. blakesleeana were identified as reported earlier (Prasad et al. 2009a) evidenced from HPLC analysis of ethyl acetate extract of the test and control samples. The metabolite peaks were identified in HPLC analysis of test sample basing on similarity in UV spectra using photodiode array detection. The chromatogram of culture control (fungus without drug) showed no metabolites peaks and substrate control (drug without fungus) showed the presence of meloxicam only. The retention time for the metabolites M1, M2 and M3 were observed to be 5.5, 4.4, 6.6 min, respectively; while the retention time of meloxicam was found to be at 12.4 min in HPLC analysis (Fig. 2). The UV spectra of meloxicam and its metabolites were found to be similar indicating the parent molecule and its biotransformed metabolites had similar UV absorption pattern (Fig. 3). This indicates that meloxicam has undergone minor structural changes while basic moiety remains intact. The metabolites were quantified based on area under the peak recorded in the HPLC analysis taking the drug and metabolites peak areas together as 100 %.
Fig. 2

HPLC chromatogram showing metabolites of meloxicam in culture broth of C. blakesleeana

Fig. 3

UV spectra of meloxicam and its metabolites produced by C. blakesleeana NCIM 687 using Photodiode array detector (PDA) of HPLC

The structure elucidation of the metabolites was carried out from the m/z values of the protonated molecular ion peaks obtained in LC–MS analysis (Fig. 4), HPLC retention times, chromatographic elution order and with earlier reports (Busch et al. 1998; Prasad et al. 2009a).The metabolic pathway of meloxicam in C. blakesleeana was shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 4

LC-MS spectra of metabolites detected in meloxicam fed culture broth of C. blakesleeana

Fig. 5

Metabolic pathway of meloxicam in C. blakesleeana NCIM 687

LC–MS analysis of test sample showed a molecular ion at m/z = 368 [M + H] +, an increase of 16 m/z units to meloxicam indicating addition of a single oxygen atom. This suggests that the compound might be 5-OH methyl meloxicam (M1). The metabolite M1 formation from meloxicam was reported to mediate by cytochrome P450 2C9 with minor contribution of CYP3A4 enzyme in mammals (Chesne et al. 1998). This derivative of meloxicam was also reported in Cunninghamella elegans, horses (Aberg et al. 2009) and in C. blakesleeana NCIM 687 (Prasad et al. 2009a).

Metabolite M2 showed a molecular ion at m/z = 382 [M + H]+ an increase of 14 m/z units, indicating clearly further addition of an oxygen and removal of two hydrogen atoms from M1. This compound might be 5-carboxy meloxicam (M2). The production of metabolite M1 using C. elegans NCIM 690, Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCIM 3090, Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441, Pseudomonas putida NCIM 2783 and the production of both metabolites M1 and M2 using Aspergillus niger NCIM 589, A. ochraceous NCIM 1140, C.echinulata NCIM 691 was reported earlier (Prasad et al. 2009a, b) and by Aberg et al. (2009) in C. elegans and horses. These metabolites viz. M1, M2 were also detected in mammals showing similar metabolism of meloxicam (Busch et al. 1998; Aberg et al. 2009). The metabolites of meloxicam both M1 and M2 were reported to be pharmacologically inactive (Davies and Skjodt 1999).

A third metabolite with m/z 438 [M + H] + was recorded with 86 m/z units higher to meloxicam. The production of M3 using C. blakesleeana was also recorded by Prasad et al. (2009b). This is an unidentified metabolite of meloxicam (M3). A probable molecular structure of metabolite M3 was presented in Fig. 3. However, further investigations are needed to confirm its structure. The LC–MS data, of the metabolites are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

LC–MS data of meloxicam metabolites by C. blakesleeana NCIM 687



[M + H]+

Predicted molecular formula

Predicted reaction





5-OH methyl meloxicam (Ml)





5-Carboxy meloxicam (M2)





Unidentified metabolite (M3)



To find the nature of enzyme involved in M1 production by C. blakesleeana, Specific inhibitors of CYP2C9 were used in the study and successful inhibitory action of tested inhibitors was observed.

Inhibition of 5-OH methyl meloxicam (M1) formation from meloxicam was studied at 50, 100, 150 and 200 µM inhibitor concentrations using known human CYP2C9 specific inhibitors viz. clopidogrel, fenofibrate, fluvoxamine and sertraline. Fungal culture with meloxicam without inhibitor was used as control to know the actual percent production of M1; The experimental results are presented in Table 3.
Table 3

Effect of different CYP2C9 inhibitors on meloxicam metabolism by C. blakesleeana

Control (without inhibitor)

Concentration of inhibitor

% of Ml produced  + SD

#Dry weight of fungal biomass in mg

75 ± 0.34

11.63 ± 0.04

Specific CYP2C9 inhibitors

 Clopidogrel (μM)


33.55 ± 0.74*

11.52 ± 0.02


23.22 ± 0.24*

11.56 ± 0.03


14.59 ± 0.91*

11.42 ± 0.02


13.03 ± 1.96*

10.33 ± 0.02

 Fenofibrate (μM)


39.13 ± 0.78*

11.62 ± 0.26


36.45 ± 0.64*

11.52 ± 0.03


25.36 ± 0.14*

11.54 ± 0.03


7.89 ± 0.12*

11.51 ± 0.03

 Fluvoxamine (μM)


35.48 ± 1.20*

11.74 ± 0.02


33.89 ± 0.24*

11.61 ± 0.03


27.91 ± 1.03*

11.57 ± 0.04


22.53 ± 0.66*

10.31 ± 0.02

 Sertraline (μM)


40.77 ± 0.50*

11.53 ± 0.005


35.73 ± 0.95*

11.51 ± 0.02


26.96 ± 0.72*

11.71 ± 0.02


11.23 ± 0.44*

10.61 ± 0.03

The values are based on three independent experiments; values are Mean ± standard deviation

* P < 0.01; # P < 0.05-non significant

From Table 3 it is clear that the yield of metabolite M1 was 75 % without addition of any inhibitors, while all the inhibitors employed in the present investigation indicated a clear concentration dependent inhibition of M1 formation from meloxicam, compared to the control.

At a concentration of 50,100 and 150 µM fenofibrate, sertraline and fluvoxamine showed similar  % inhibition of M1, while at 200 µM concentration, fenofibrate, sertraline and fluvoxamine resulted in 7.89, 11.23 and 22.53 % inhibition of M1, respectively. Among all the inhibitors tested, clopidogrel was found to achieve maximum inhibition of M1 formation at 100 and 150 µM concentrations, which may be attributed to the saturation of binding sites.

Biomass production in control and test samples of fungal cultures showed similar pattern of growth. There was no statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between fungal growth in controls and experimental groups, wherein the added test molecules had not impacted the growth of the fungus (Table 3).

Fenofibrate at 50–200 µM and clopidogrel at 50–150 µM were found to be the potent inhibitors of M1 formation followed by sertraline and fluoxamine at 50–200 µM. Similar results with clopidogrel and fenofibrate was reported in human liver microsomes by Richter et al. (2004) and Vecera et al. (2011). Schmider et al. (1997) also reported inhibition of CYP2C9 using sertraline in human liver microsomes. Strong inhibition of CYP2C9 with fluvoxamine in human liver microsomes was also recorded by Hemeryck et al. (1999) and Madsen et al. (2011). Zing et al. (2010) also studied the influence of fluvoxamine on CYP2C9*3 and CYP2C9*13 enzymes by expressing in yeast cells.

In the present study, in silico analysis, was further substantiated by in vitro experimental data suggesting the inhibitory action of tested CYP2C9 inhibitors on CYP2C9 enzyme. Among inhibitors tested fenofibrate was found to be a potent inhibitor of M1 formation followed by sertralinee, fluoxamine and clopidogrel. Additionally, it is clear that CYP2C9 like enzyme exists in C. blakesleeana and had catalyzed the formation of 5-OH methyl meloxicam (M1) from meloxicam which, is akin to mammalian xenobiotics.


In the present investigation, in silico studies clearly predicted the interaction of specific CYP2C9 inhibitors with human CYP2C9 enzyme. The drug docking studies were substantiated by in vitro studies. The metabolite M1 formation from meloxicam by C. blakesleeana was strongly inhibited using specific inhibitors of CYP2C9 viz. fenofibrate followed by sertralinee, clopidogrel and fluvoxamine. Similarly, metabolites of meloxicam reported in mammals were also detected employing C. blakesleeana as a model organism. This is indicative of the existence of a similar type of enzyme system present in fungus that is akin to mammals. Hence, C. blakesleeana may be used as a model organism in predicting drug–drug interactions as well as in studying mammalian drug metabolism, which provides true physiological environment as in animals.



Meloxicam was gifted by Unichem Laboratories Mumbai, India. Clopidogrel, fenofibrate fluvoxamine and sertraline were obtained from the Dr. Reddy Labs, Hyderabad, KU Warangal. Methanol was of HPLC grade obtained from Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., New Delhi, India. Peptone, yeast extract, NaCl, glucose, K2HPO4 and all other chemicals were obtained from Himedia Labs, Mumbai, India.


Cunninghamella blakesleeana NCIM 687 was procured from National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India. Stock cultures were maintained on Potato dextrose agar slants at 4 °C and sub cultured for every 3 months for maintaining viability.

In silico studies: Virtual screening for interaction of specific CYP29 inhibitors with human CYP2C9 enzyme by molecular docking

In the present In silico study, specific human CYP2C9 enzyme inhibitors viz. clopidogrel, fenofibrate fluvoxamine and sertraline were used as ligands and were screened against the crystal structure of human cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 enzyme with PDB code 1OG2. An advanced molecular docking program Auto Dock Vina, version 4.2 available from was applied to select ligand active against CYP2C9 enzyme and estimating the binding affinities (kcal mol−1). The CYP2C9 enzyme was downloaded from protein data bank (PDB code: 1OG2) and all the ligands were downloaded from PubChem database and optimised by removing water molecules and adding hydrogens. Later, both ligands and receptor was saved as pdbqt format. A grid box was adjusted to have center x = 14.846, y = 69.693, and z = 21.831 to cover the pocket with the main residues of enzyme binding site. The best conformation was chosen with the lowest docked energy, based on complete docking search (ten runs). The interactions of CYP2C9 enzyme with the ligands, hydrogen bonds, bond lengths, Root Mean Square Difference (RMSD) were analyzed using PyMOL software.

In vitro studies: fermentation conditions

Microbial fermentation was carried out in a liquid broth containing (per liter) Yeast extract (5 g), glucose(20 g), peptone (5 g), NaCl (5 g), K2HPO4 (5 g). Specified quantities of the media ingredients were dissolved in distilled water, pH was adjusted to 6.0 with either 0.1 N HCl or 0.1 N NaOH and sterilized by autoclaving and cooled before inoculation. Transformation of meloxicam was performed by incubating culture flasks on a rotary shaker at 120 rpm and 27 °C according to two stage fermentation procedure. In the first stage, fermentation was initiated by inoculating a 100 ml culture flask consisting of 20 ml of liquid broth with loopful of spores obtained from freshly grown agar slant. After incubation for 48 h second stage cultures were initiated in the same medium using inoculum of 1.0 ml from the first stage culture per 20 ml of medium in a 100-ml culture flask and incubated for 24 h under similar conditions. Two mg of meloxicam (in 200 µl DMSO) was added to the culture flasks and incubated further for another 4 days.

Two types of controls were run simultaneously with the fermentation and worked up with the same method. One was culture control consisted of a fermentation blank in which the microorganism was grown under identical conditions without the substrate. The other was substrate control comprised of meloxicam added to the sterile medium without fungus and incubated under similar conditions. Three independent experiments were carried out.

Extraction of metabolites

At the end of incubation period, the fungal mat was separated from the culture broth and dried, pH of the broth was acidified to 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid and the later was extracted with three volumes of ethyl acetate, the combined organic extracts were evaporated using a rotary vacuum evaporator and dried over a bed of sodium sulfate. The resultant residues were analyzed by HPLC and LC–MS for presence and identification of metabolites.

Analytical procedures

HPLC analysis was performed according to the method described by Prasad et al. (2009a). The samples were analyzed using an Agilent 1260 infinity system (USA) by injecting 20 µl into the syringe-loading sample injector (Agilent, Model G1328C). The column used was Agilent, Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18, 4.6 × 250 mm and 5 µm (USA). A mixture of methanol–water (pH adjusted to 3.0 with orthophosphoric acid) in the ratio of 60:40 was the mobile phase used. The analysis was performed at a flow rate of 1 ml/min isocratically and the analytes were detected at 363 nm using a photodiode array detector (Agilent, Model G1315D, USA). LC–MS analysis was carried out using system MDS SCIEX API-4000,Q-TRAP, Canada with MS/MS API-4000,Q-Trap detector with triple quadrapole mass detector. Chromatographic separation was achieved by Waters column X Terra C18, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm and the same mobile phase used for HPLC was used (pH adjusted to 3.0 with formic acid). The ESI detection was set to positive mode. A temperature of 300 °C and scan range of 50–900 was set for the analysis. The transformed compounds were identified from the masses of products obtained in LC–MS analysis and previous reports.

Metabolic inhibition of meloxicam

The inhibition of metabolism of meloxicam was studied using specific inhibitors of human CYP2C9 viz. clopidogrel, fenofibrate, fluoxamine and sertraline in fungal culture C. blakesleeana NCIM 687. The fungal culture was grown in the same medium which is used for biotransformation, and a two-stage fermentation protocol was adapted for the study. Each 20 ml of the second-stage cultures was added with 50, 100, 150, and 200 µg of inhibitors (dissolved in 100 μl DMSO) separately and incubated at 27 °C for 24 h. The CYP2C9 enzyme inhibited second-stage cultures were added with 2 mg each of meloxicam dissolved in 200 μl DMSO. Each inhibitor was studied in triplicates while running suitable controls. The contents of the flasks were extracted and analyzed using the procedure similar to that employed for meloxicam metabolism by C. blakesleeana. The percent of 5′-OH methyl meloxicam production in the cultures was calculated for studying the metabolic inhibition by inhibitors used.

Statistical analysis

The experimental results were analyzed statistically (student’s t test) using Sigma Stat statistical software, version 11.0 (Jandel Corporation, Sam Rafael, CA, USA) software program package. The P values below 0.01 were considered statistically significant. The results were expressed as mean ± SD. The experiments were carried out in triplicates.


Authors’ contributions

GSP conceived the idea and carried out the experimental part. KS involved in experimental part and carried out statistical work. BSR was involved in interpretation of data, writing the manuscript and provided the laboratory facilities. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Dr. G. Shyam Prasad is thankful to University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India for providing Dr. D. S. Kotari fellowship at Department of Biochemistry, Osmania University, Hyderabad.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry, University College of Science, Osmania University
Department of Pharmacy, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Satavahana University


  1. Aberg AT, Olssonb C, Bondessona ULF, Hedeland M (2009) A mass spectrometric study on meloxicam metabolism in horses and the fungus Cunninghamella elegans, and the relevance of this microbial system as a model of drug metabolism in the horse. J Mass Spectrom 44:1026–1037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Busch U, Schmid J, Heinzel G, Schmaus H (1998) Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in animals with relevance to humans. Drug Metab Dispos 26:576–584Google Scholar
  3. Chan TYK (1998) Drug interactions as a cause of over-anticoagulation and bleedings in Chinese patients receiving warfarin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 36:403–405Google Scholar
  4. Chesne C, Guyomard C, Guillouzo A, Schmid J, Ludwig E, Sauter T (1998) Metabolism of meloxicam in human liver involves cytochrome P4502C9 and 3A4. Xenobiotica 28:1–13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NM, Skjodt NM (1999) Clinical pharmacokinetics of meloxicam. A cyclo-oxygenase-2 preferential non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drug. Clin Pharmacokinet 36:115–126View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Doucet JJA, Noel D, Geffroy CE, Capet C, Coquard A, Couffin E, Fauchais AL, Chassagne P, Schleifer M (2002) Preventable and non-preventable risk factors for adverse drug events related to hospital admissions in the elderly: a prospective study. Clin Drug Investig 22:385–392View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hemeryck A, De Vriendt C, Belpaire FM (1999) Inhibition of CYP2C9 by serotonin reuptake inhibitors: in vitro studies with tolbutamide and (S)-warfarin using human liver microsomes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54:947–951View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lisowska K, Szemraj J, Rozalska S, Dlugonski J (2006) The expression of cytochrome P-450 and cytochrome P450 reductase genes in the simultaneous transformation of corticosteroids and phenanthrene by Cunninghamell elegans. FEMS Microb Lett 261:175–180View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Madsen H, Enggaard TP, Hansen LL, Klitgaard NA, Brosen K (2011) Fluvoxamine inhibits the CYP2C9 catalyzed biotransformation of Tolbutamide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:41–47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Manahan BP, Ferguson CL, Killeavy ES, Lioyd BK, Troy J, Cantilena LR (1990) Torsades de pointes occurring in association with terfenadine use. JAMA 264:2788–2790View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pichard L, Fabre I, FabreG Domergue J, Aubert SB, Mourad G, Maurel P (1990) Cyclosporin A drug interactions: screening for inducers and inhibitors of cytochrome P-450 (cyclosporine A oxidase) in primary cultures of human hepatocytes and in liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 18:595–606Google Scholar
  12. Prasad GS, Girisham S, Reddy SM (2009a) Studies on microbial transformation of meloxicam by fungi. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:922–931View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Prasad GS, Rao KN, Girisham S, Reddy SM (2009b) Bioconversion of meloxicam by bacteria. Afr J Biotechnol 8:3610–3614Google Scholar
  14. Pupo MT, Borges KB, Borges WA, Bonato PS (2007) Microbial biotechnology. In: Saikai R, Bezbaruah RL, Bora TCH (eds) Fungal biotransformations: a powerful tool in drug metabolism studies. New India Publishing Agency, India, pp 47–66Google Scholar
  15. Richter T, Murdter TE, Heinkele G, Pleiss J, Tatzel S, Schwab M, Eichelbaum M, Zanger UM (2004) Potent mechanism-based inhibition of human CYP2B6 by clopidogrel and ticlopidine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308:189–197View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Romet JM, Crawford K, Cyr T, Inaba T (1994) Terfenadine metabolism in human liver: in vitro inhibition by macrolide antibiotics and azole antifungals. Drug Metab Dispos 22:849–857Google Scholar
  17. Schmid J, Busch U, Henizel G, Bozler G, Kasehke S, Kummer M (1995) Meloxicam pharmacokinetics and metabolic pattern after intravenous infusion and oral administration to healthy subjects. Drug Metab Dispos 23:1206–1213Google Scholar
  18. Schmider J, Greenblatt DJ, Lisa L, Moltke Von, Karsov D, Shader RI (1997) Inhibition of CYP2C9 by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in vitro studies of phenytoin p-hydroxylation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 44:495–498View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sokuda H, Nishiyama T, Ogura K, Nagayama S, Ikeda K, Yamaguchi S, Nakamura Y, Kawaguchi Y, Watable T (1997) Lethal drug interactions of sorivudine, a new antiviral drug, with oral 5-fluorouracil prodrugs. Drug Metab Dispos 25:270–273Google Scholar
  20. Vecera R, Zacharova A, OrolinJ Strojil J, Skottova N, Anzenbacher P (2011) Fenofibrate-induced decrease of expression of CYP2C11 and CYP2C6 in rat. Drug Metab Dispos 32:482–487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Venkatakrishna K, Moltke VLL, Greenblatt DJ (2000) Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet 38:111–180View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ, Cotreau-Bibbo MM, Duan SX, Harmatz JS, Shader RI (1994) Inhibition of desipramine hydroxylation invitro by serotonin reuptake-inhibitor antidepressants and by quinidine and ketoconazole: a model system to predict drug interactions in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:1278–1283Google Scholar
  23. Wandel C, Lang CC, Cowart DC, Girard AF, Bramer S, Flockhart DA, Wood AJ (1998) Effect of CYP3A inhibition on vesnarinone metabolism in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 63:506–511View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Watabe T (1996) Strategic proposals for predicting drug-drug interactions during new drug development: based on sixteen deaths caused by interactions of the new antiviral sorivudine with 5-fluorouracil prodrugs. J Toxicol Sci 21:299–300View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang D, Zhang H, Aranibar N, Hanson R, Huang Y, Cheng PT, Shung W, Bonacorsi S, Mingshe Z, Swaminathan A, Humphreys WG (2006) Structural elucidation of human oxidative metabolites of muraglitazar: use of microbial bioreactors in the biosynthesis of metabolite standards. Drug Metab Dispos 34:267–280View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zing J, Liu D, Ma P, Huang H, Zhu J, Wei D, Yang J, Chen C (2010) Effects of CYP2C9*3 and CYP*13 on diclofenac metabolism and inhibition-based drug–drug interaction. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 25:343–350View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Prasad et al. 2016