- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Solution of fractional bioheat equation in terms of Fox’s H-function
SpringerPlus volume 5, Article number: 111 (2016)
Abstract
Present paper deals with the solution of time and space fractional Pennes bioheat equation. We consider time fractional derivative and space fractional derivative in the form of Caputo fractional derivative of order \(\alpha \in \left( 0,1\right]\) and Riesz–Feller fractional derivative of order \(\beta \in \left( 1,2\right]\) respectively. We obtain solution in terms of Fox’s H-function with some special cases, by using Fourier–Laplace transforms.
Background
The transfer of heat in skin tissue is mainly a heat conduction process, which is coupled to several additional complicated physiological process, including blood circulation, sweating, metabolic heat generation and sometimes heat dissipation via hair or fur above the skin surface (Ozisik 1985). Accurate description of the thermal interaction between vasculature and tissue is essential for the advancement of medical technology in treating fatal disease such as tumors and skin cancer. Mathematical model has been used significantly in the analysis of hyperthermia in treating tumors, cryosurgery, fatal-placental studies, and many other applications (Minkowycz et al. 2009).
Fractals and fractional calculus have been used to improve the modelling accuracy of many phenomena in natural science. The most important advantage of using fractional calculus approach is due to its non-local property. This means that the next state of a system depends not only upon its current state but also upon all of its historical states. Many researchers worked on fractional partial differential equations and gave very important results. Mainardi et al. (2005) obtained the fundamental solution of Cauchy problem for the space–time fractional diffusion equation in terms of H-function, Langlands (2006) gave the solution of a modified fractional diffusion equation on an infinite domain, Salim and El-Kahlout (2009) discussed exact solution of time fractional advection dispersion equation with reaction term, Saxena et al. (2006) obtained solution of generalized fractional kinetic equation in terms of Mittag-Leffler function, Haubold et al. (2011a) obtained solution of a fractional reaction diffusion equation in closed form, Huang and Guo (2010) gave the fundamental solutions to a class of the time fractional partial differential equation for Cauchy problem in a whole-space domain and signalling problem in a half-space domain. Shang (2015) gave analytic solution of viral infection dynamics in vivo through a time-inhomogeneous Markov chain characterization by Lie algebraic approach.
In present study, we consider fractional form of Pennes bioheat equation by replacing first order time derivative by Caputo fractional derivative of order \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) and second order space derivative by Riesz–Feller fractional derivative of order \(\beta \in\left( 1,2\right]\) respectively. We make an attempt to solve the fractional model by dividing it into two sections. In section one, time fractional derivative is considered while in section two, space fractional derivative is taken into account. We apply Laplace–Fourier transform and obtain the solution in term of Fox H-function.
Preliminaries and notations
Fractional derivative of order α is denoted as \(_{a}D_{t}^{\alpha }f(t)\), the subscripts a and t denote the two limits related to the operation of fractional differentiation, which are called the terminal of fractional differentiation. If \(\alpha\) is negative then it denotes the fractional integrals of arbitrary order.
Definition 1
(Kilbas et al. 2006) The Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative of order \(\alpha > 0\) for \(Real(\alpha )> 0\) and \(m \in N, t > a\) is defined as
Definition 2
(Kilbas et al. 2006) The Caputo fractional derivative of order \(\alpha >0\), for \(Real(\alpha )>0\) and \(m\in N, t>a\) is defined as
Definition 3
(Kilbas et al. 2010) The Laplace transform of function f(t) denoted by F(s), s being the complex variable is defined as
Inverse Laplace transform of F(s) is defined as
Laplace transform of Caputo derivative (Podlubny 1999) is given as
Definition 4
(Debnath and Bhatta 2007) The Fourier transform of a function f(x) is denoted by \(F^{*}(k)\) and defined as
where, f(x) is continuous and absolutely integrable in \((-\infty ,\infty ).\) Inverse Fourier transform is defined as
Fourier cosine transform and Inverse Fourier cosine transform are defined as (Debnath and Bhatta 2007)
The Fourier convolution of two functions is defined (Debnath and Bhatta 2007) as
Definition 5
(Kilbas et al. 2010) The Mellin transform of a function \(\phi (t)\) is defined as
and inverse Mellin transform as
Definition 6
(Kilbas et al. 2006) Riesz–Feller partial fractional derivative \(\left( {D_{\theta ;x}^\beta u} \right) \left( {x,t} \right)\) defined, for \(0<\beta \le 2\) and \(\left| \theta \right| \le \min \left[ {\beta ,2 - \beta } \right]\) via the Fourier transform, by
Definition 7
(Podlubny 1999) Mittag-Leffler function for one parameter is denoted by \(E_{\alpha }(z)\) and defined as
Mittag-Leffler function for two parameter is denoted by \(E_{\alpha },_{\beta }(z)\) and defined as
Podlubny (1999) reported the Laplace transform of a derivative of Mittag Leffler function as
and inverse Laplace transform of (16) is also existing as
Definition 8
(Mathai et al. 2010) The H- function is defined by means of a Mellin–Barners type integral in the following manner
where,
and an empty product is interpreted as unity, \(m,n,p,q\in N_{0}\) with \(0 \le n \le p, 0 \le m \le q, A_{j},B_{j}\in R_{+}, a_{j},b_{j}\in C, j=1,\ldots ,p;\quad j=1,\ldots ,q,\) such that \(A_{{j}}(b_{l}+k)\ne B_{l}(a_{j}-\lambda -1), k,\lambda \in N_{0};\quad {j}{=1,\ldots ,n;}\quad {j=1,\ldots ,m.}\) where \(N_{0}= 0,1,2,\ldots ,R=(-\infty ,\infty ),~~R_{+}=(0,\infty )\) and C being the complex number field. The counter \(\Omega\) is infinite contour which separates all the poles of \(\Gamma (1-a_{{j}} +sA_{l}),~~ {j}=1,\ldots ,n.\)
The relation between derivative of Mittag-Leffler function and H-Function (Langlands 2006) is given as
Fractional bioheat equation
The Pennes bioheat model (Pennes 1948) is widely used for study of the heat transfer in skin tissue due to its simplicity, ease application and effectiveness. Pennes (1948) suggested that the rate of heat transfer between blood and tissue is proportional to the product of the volumetric perfusion rate and difference between the arterial blood temperature and the local tissue temperature. Pennes equation is employed to describe the heat transfer process as
where \(\rho\), c and k represent density, specific heat and thermal conductivity respectively. T, t and x represent, temperature, time and distance respectively; the subscript b denotes for blood. \(T_{a}\) and \(W_{b}\) are artillery temperature and blood perfusion rate respectively. \(Q_{met}\) and \(Q_{ext}\) are metabolic heat generation and external heat source in skin tissue respectively.
Considering Eq. (20) and replacing first order time derivative by Caputo fractional derivative of order \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) and second order space derivative by Riesz–Feller fractional derivative of order \(\beta \in \left( 1,2\right]\). The fractional form of Pennes bioheat equation is given as
Initial and boundary conditions of Eq. (21) are given below as
To find solution of Eq. (21) to (23). We divide it into two parts, in first part, the time fractional is considered while in second part, the space fractional is considered.
Time fractional bioheat equation
On setting \(\beta =2\) in Eq. (21), this reduces to the following equation
For converting Eq. (24) in dimensionless variable, we consider
On making the use of dimensionless variables as Eq. (25). We can reduce Eqs. (22) to (24) into Eq. (26) to (28) as
Solution
On replacing fractional derivative by Caputo fractional derivative and taking the Fourier–Laplace transform (Haubold et al. 2011b) of Eq. (26) and further using Eq. (5) and Eq. (6), we get
where \(\overline{\theta }^*\) is Fourier Laplace transform of \(\theta\), on further simplifications, we get
On taking inverse Laplace transform of Eq. (29) and using Eq. (17), we get
On replacing derivative of Mittag-Leffler function by H-function using Eq. (19), Eq. (30) reduces to the following form
Now we consider
to invert Fourier transform of Eq. (31), we first invert Fourier transform of Eq. (32), by taking its Mellin transform, since Mellin transform of H-function (Srivastava et al. 1982) is given below as
with the following conditions
and
Further Mellin transform of a Fourier transform is given as (Langlands 2006)
therefore the Mellin transform of Eq. (32) is
On taking the inverse Fourier transform of Eq. (31) by using Eq. (10), we get
Special case
On considering time fractional bioheat equation (24) in semi infinite space with \(Q_{met}=0(\phi =0)\) and Neumann boundary condition on the left hand boundary, i.e. Eq. (23) is replaced by the following equation
for dimensionless variable, we consider
On making the use of Eq. (38), then Eqs. (24) and (37) reduce to
Further, on applying the Fourier cosine–Laplace transform to Eq. (39) and using Eq. (5) and Eq. (8), we obtain
where,
further simplification leads us
Now taking inverse Laplace transformation to Eq. (41), as in light of Eq. (17), we get
Afterwards using Eq. (19), then Eq. (42) reduces to the following form
Now we find it’s inverse Fourier cosine transform by using Eq. (33) and the following result (Langlands 2006) as
Thus we get
This is the solution of special case for the time fractional bioheat equation in the form of well knows H-function (see in details Mathai et al. 2010 ).
Space fractional bioheat equation
we consider \(\alpha =1\) in Eq. (21) and dimensionless variables as
since Riez–Feller derivative of constant is not zero, therefore a new space dependent term \(f(\zeta )\) is introduced for simplification.
where \(f(\zeta )=\frac{W_{b}c_{b}T_{a}}{\Gamma (1-\beta )T_{0}}\zeta ^{-\beta }\), initial and boundary conditions are given in Eqs. (27) and (28) respectively.
Solution
On taking Fourier–Laplace transform of Eq. (47), and using Eq. (13), this leads us
further simplification gives,
On taking inverse Laplace transform of Eq. (47) and using Eq. (17), this yields
afterwards taking the inverse Fourier transform of Eq. (48) and employing the following results of Haubold et al. (2011b), which is given as
Finally, we arrive at
This is a solution of space fractional bioheat equation.
Conclusion
In this paper, we have investigated the temperature distribution of the biological tissue based on fractional bioheat transfer model. The fractional bioheat transfer equation is solved using integral transforms which yields analytical solution. This analytical solution may be useful in measurement of thermal parameters, reconstruction of temperature field, thermal diagnosis and thermal treatments.
References
Debnath L, Bhatta D (2007) Integral transforms and their applications, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor and Francis Group, New York
Haubold HJ, Mathai AM, Saxena RK (2011a) Further solutions of fractional reaction-diffusion equations in terms of H-function. J Comput Appl Math 235(5):1311–1316
Haubold HJ, Mathai AM, Saxena RK (2011b) Mittag-Leffler functions and their application. J Appl Math 51. doi:10.1155/2011/298628
Huang F, Guo B (2010) General solutions to a class of time fractional partial differential eqautions. Appl Math Mech 31:815–826
Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Kilbas AA, Luchko YF, Martinez H, Trujillo JJ (2010) Fractional Fourier transform in the framework of fractional calculus operators. Integral Transforms Spec Funct 21:779–795
Langlands TAM (2006) Solution of a modified fractional diffusion equation. Phys A 367:136–144
Mainardi F, Pagnini G, Saxena RK (2005) Fox H function in fractional calculus. J Comput Appl Math 178:321–331
Mathai AM, Saxena RK, Haubold HJ (2010) The H-function: theory and applications. Springer, New York
Minkowycz WJ, Sparrow EM, Abraham JP (2009) Advances in numerical heat transfer. CRC Press, New York
Ozisik MN (1985) Heat transfer: a basic approach. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore
Pennes HH (1948) Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperature in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol 1:93–122
Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic Press, New York
Salim TO, El-Kahlout A (2009) Analytical solution of time-fractional advection dispersion equation. Appl Appl Math 4:176–188
Saxena RK, Mathai AM, Haubold HJ (2006) Solution of fractional generalized reaction–diffusion equations. Astrophys Space Sci 305:305–313
Shang Y (2015) Analytical solution for an in host viral infection model with time in-homogeneous rates. Acta Phys Pol B 46:1567–1577
Srivastava H, Gupta K, Goyal S (1982) The H-functions of one and two variables with applications. South Asian Publishers Pvt Ltd, New Delhi
Authors’ contributions
The authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to anonymous referees for their comments and valuable suggestions which helped us for improving this paper. The first author is also thankful to Technical Education Department, Government of Gujarat, India for providing the opportunity to carry out this work at SVNIT, Surat, India under quality improvement programme.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Damor, R.S., Kumar, S. & Shukla, A.K. Solution of fractional bioheat equation in terms of Fox’s H-function. SpringerPlus 5, 111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1743-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1743-2