- Case Study
- Open Access
Prophylactic placement of a covered nitinol stent to prevent carotid blowout in a patient with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis from esophageal cancer
© Fujita et al. 2015
- Received: 15 June 2015
- Accepted: 13 August 2015
- Published: 25 August 2015
Enlargement of primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer can be progressive and invade the surrounding vessels despite intensive treatment. Carotid blowout (CBS) tends to occur in these patients, and prompt treatment is required. Surgical management of carotid blowout is technically troublesome because exploration and repair of the previously irradiated or tumor-invaded field are difficult. Endovascular therapy with stent deployment is a good alternative to surgery. Even with such interventional procedures as stent grafting, it is sometimes difficult to obtain favorable outcomes in end-stage patients with poor general conditions. The prophylactic placement of a covered nitinol stent was performed to prevent carotid blowout in a patient with supraclavicular lymph node metastasis from esophageal cancer, and fatal bleeding due to carotid blowout was avoided. The usefulness of the prophylactic placement of a covered nitinol stent for preventing carotid blowout in an end-stage patient is presented.
- Covered nitinol stent
- Carotid blowout
- Lymph node metastasis
Patients with esophageal cancer have a poor prognosis because they often have no symptoms until their disease is advanced (Schweigert et al. 2013). In most patients with advanced cancer, mediastinal, supraclavicular, and intra-abdominal lymph node metastases occur (Schweigert et al. 2013; Schoppmann et al. 2013). Irradiation and systemic chemotherapy are the mainstay for treating these patients (Meng et al. 2013). Despite intensive treatment, progressive enlargement of primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes can occur. This can result in regional tumor invasion to the surrounding structures, which is frequently associated with airway obstruction, a tracheo-esophageal fistula, or rupture of large arteries (Pennathur et al. 2013).
The mortality and morbidity rates associated with carotid rupture are reported to be unacceptably high (Chaloupka et al. 1999). The treatment is usually surgical exploration with ligation of the involved vessel; however, infections, radiation-induced necrosis, and prior surgical exploration make the surgical approach technically difficult (Katras et al. 1999).
Interventional procedures, including percutaneous stent placement or coil embolization, provide a better alternative to surgery, accompanied by less patient morbidity and suffering (Pyun et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2007).
Prophylactic placement of a covered nitinol stent to prevent carotid rupture in a patient in whom the metastatic lymph node invaded directly to the surrounding common carotid artery is reported.
A 62-year-old man, who had known T3, N4, M0, Stage IVa squamous cell carcinoma of the middle esophagus, presented with dysphagia and was admitted to our institute. Regional radiotherapy extending from the supraclavicular fossa to the pericardial area, including the entire mediastinum, was planned. A total dose of 50.4 Gy of radiation therapy was delivered and systemic chemotherapy consisting of low-dose cisplatin and 5FU was concurrently performed. Eight months after the initial treatment, right supraclavicular lymph node enlargement was seen on follow-up computed tomography (CT). Although 20 Gy of additional irradiation were given to the right supraclavicular fossa, the metastatic lymph node enlarged and invaded the surrounding soft tissue. Left common carotid artery was confirmed to be intact on contrast enhanced CT.
After obtaining written, informed consent from the patient, an 8-French (8-Fr) angiographic sheath was placed via the right femoral artery. Radiopaque markers were placed on the right neck surface as markers of the appropriate position planned for placing the stent by adhesive tape before the procedure. A 4-Fr headhunter catheter was then inserted into the right common carotid artery, and angiographic examination was performed.
A covered stent graft (Niti-S stent, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea), with a body diameter of 10 mm and a length of 60 mm, was advanced along the stiff guide wire to the right carotid artery in a similar way reported by previous studies (Chang et al. 2007; Chaloupka et al. 1999).
The stent was deployed to fully cover the artery that the adjacent tumor had invaded and threatened to cause impending rupture, with reference to the body markers. The distal end of the stent was placed below the carotid bifurcation, and the proximal end was placed at the origin of the common carotid artery.
Carotid blowout, or rupture of the carotid artery, is one of the most feared complications of head and neck treatment for malignant disease. Risk factors for CBS include wound infection, radiation therapy, radical resection and stripping of the carotid sheath, flap necrosis with carotid exposure and recurrent tumor (Pyun et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2007, 2008).
Recurrence or regrowth of supraclavicular lymph node metastases is sometimes encountered in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. A metastatic lymph node could directly infiltrate the surrounding structure and lead to the rupture of the carotid artery (Chang et al. 2007).
Especially in patients with advanced cancer, carotid artery rupture is life-threatening. Prompt treatment is required because patients with CBS have a 60 % risk of neurological morbidity and a 40 % risk of mortality (Citardi et al. 1995). Treatment for CBS includes surgery with resection and reconstruction of carotid artery ligation. Recently, endovascular procedures, including embolization with platinum coils and stent-graft placement, have also been useful for the treatment of a ruptured carotid artery. These procedures have many advantages over surgical techniques due to their high success rate, reduced invasiveness, and lower late complication rate (Pyun et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2007, 2008).
Many reports have described the usefulness of covered stent placement and coil embolization in patients with active bleeding due to CBS or impending carotid rupture; however, few reports have described the prophylactic placement of covered stents (Bates and Shamsham 2003). A covered stent-graft could protect the carotid artery from direct tumor infiltration. As a consequence, CBS and formation of a pseudoaneurysm can be prevented.
The current patient presented without episodes of hemorrhage or impending carotid rupture, but the tumor was located in the right supraclavicular fossa and invaded to the adjacent carotid sheath, suggesting impending carotid rupture or formation of a pseudoaneurysm that necessitated emergency treatment. Due to the fact that the general performance status of these patients is often poor, it was assumed that inserting the stent for the purpose of managing the massive bleeding in end-stage patients before the carotid artery were to rupture would be preferable. In addition, once the CBS occurs in these patients, their status is usually worse than at the time of initial chemoradiotherapy. Thus, a vascular intervention is often more invasive to the patient and more technically difficult for the operators.
At first, we considered coil embolization as an alternative endovascular treatment. Coil embolization would require the balloon occlusion test to evaluate the vascular anatomy and contralateral circulation. In addition, it needs many coils and consequently costs very much and takes long time related the procedure. It seemed to be very important to briefly complete the treatment within a minimum session time for avoiding the suffering associated with interventional procedures in a terminal patient. We selected covered stent placement because the covered stent can be easily inserted to the artery and quickly employed. We thought that the covered stent placement could achieve a purpose to prevent carotid blow out in a short time.
In conclusion, although it may not always be necessary to perform stent placement in patients who do not wish for further palliative care, the current case report indicates that the prophylactic placement of a covered stent may be an effective option for the treatment of preventing carotid artery rupture in cases with advanced esophageal cancer; furthermore, it leads to maintaining the patients’ quality of life without any neurologic or stenting sequelae.
TF and MT carried out clinical studies. TF prepared manuscript. KI and NM reviewed manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We wish to thank the patient for consenting for the publication.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Bates MC, Shamsham FM (2003) Endovascular management of impending carotid rupture in a patient with advanced head and neck cancer. J Endovasc Ther 10:54–57Google Scholar
- Chaloupka JC, Roth TC, Putman CM et al (1999) Recurrent carotid blowout syndrome: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in a newly recognized subgroup of patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1069–1077Google Scholar
- Chang FC, Lirng JF, Luo CB et al (2007) Carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head-and-neck cancers: reconstructive management by self-expandable stent-grafts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:181–188Google Scholar
- Chang FC, Lirng JF, Luo CB et al (2008) Patients with head and neck cancers and associated postirradiated carotid blowout syndrome: endovascular therapeutic methods and outcomes. J Vasc Surg 47:936–945View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Citardi MJ, Chaloupka JC, Son YH et al (1995) Management of carotid artery rupture by monitored endovascular therapeutic occlusion (1988–1994). Laryngoscope 105:1086–1092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katras T, Baltazar U, Colvett K et al (1999) Radiation-related arterial disease. Am Surg 65:1176–1179Google Scholar
- Meng MB, Zaorsky NG, Jiang C et al (2013) Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with improved outcomes over surgery and chemotherapy in the management of limited-stage small cell esophageal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 106:317–322View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA et al (2013) Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 381:400–412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pyun HW, Lee DH, Yoo HM et al (2007) Placement of covered stents for carotid blowout in patients with head and neck cancer: follow-up results after rescue treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1594–1598View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schoppmann SF, Jesch B, Zacherl J et al (2013) Lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion diminishes prognosis in esophageal cancer. Surgery 153:526–534View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schweigert M, Dubecz A, Stein HJ (2013) Oesophageal cancer—an overview. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:230–244View ArticleGoogle Scholar