Open Access

Multi-district coronary tree involvement in a 17-year-old girl with Williams–Beuren syndrome

  • Tiziana Serena1Email author,
  • Enrico Valerio1,
  • Biagio Castaldi1,
  • Elena Reffo1 and
  • Ornella Milanesi1
SpringerPlus20154:436

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1231-0

Received: 19 May 2015

Accepted: 10 August 2015

Published: 20 August 2015

Abstract

We describe a case of 17-year-old Chinese girl referred to our Pediatric Cardiology Unit for asthenia, reduced exercise tolerance, and dyspnea. Past medical history was relevant for multiple chest pain episodes in childhood and several syncopal episodes, for which the patient had been never evaluated. Clinical examination, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography were compatible with Williams–Beuren syndrome; such condition was later confirmed by genetic analysis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed transmural fibrosis of the apex with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (29 %), severe stenosis of aortic sinotubular junction with left and right coronary ostia involvement; more importantly, the whole coronary artery tree beyond ostia was affected by multiple stenosis and aneurysmatic tracts. Ascending aorta proved hypoplastic, with post-stenotic dilation and multiple aneurysms. At the end of the diagnostic process, surgical risk was considered too high to proceed with the correction. The presented case is of educational value since it provides good iconographical illustration of diffuse, multiple-site coronary artery tree involvement, a rather rare co-morbidity in Williams–Beuren syndrome.

Keywords

Williams–Beuren syndrome Myocardial infarction Supravalvular aortic stenosis Multi-district coronary artery disease Pediatric cardiology

Case report

A 17-year-old Chinese girl was referred to our Pediatric Cardiology Unit for asthenia, impaired exercise tolerance, and dyspnea. Past medical history was relevant for multiple chest pain episodes in childhood and several syncopal episodes, for which the patient had been never evaluated.

Clinical examination showed typical features of Williams Beuren Syndrome (WBS), an harsh (4/6 of Levine scale) systolic murmur at the right upper sterna border, and hyposphagmic peripheral pulses.

Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed left ventricular hypertrophy with diffuse repolarization abnormalities.

Echocardiography detected a severe left ventricular medio-basal hypertrophy associated with significant mid-ventricular pressure gradient (35–40 mmHg), a reduced apical wall thickness (Additional file 1: Video S1), apical dyskinesia (Additional file 2: Video S2), a severe supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS) involving coronary ostia, and a mild pericardial effusion. Estimated right ventricular pressure was 50 mmHg.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed transmural fibrosis of the apex (Fig. 1); left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29 %. Aortic sinotubular junction was severely stenotic, also with involvement of left and right coronary ostia; beyond ostial region, the whole coronary artery tree was affected by multiple stenosis and aneurysmatic tracts (Fig. 2). Ascending aorta proved hypoplastic; aortic arch was affected by post-stenotic dilation and multiple aneurysms (Fig. 3). On the contrary, pulmonary artery tree showed no significant abnormalities.
Fig. 1

Heart MRI scans showing thinning and aneurysmatic dilation of apical myocardium, associated with transmural myocardial fibrosis

Fig. 2

Heart MRI scan showing multiple stenotic and aneurysmatic tracts along the whole coronary artery tree

Fig. 3

MRI 3D aortic arch reconstruction showing severe hypoplasia and multiple aneurysms of ascending aorta, extending till first brachiocephalic artery; sinotubular junction is also severely stenotic

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed and documented microdeletion of 7q11.2 region, consistent with WBS.

At the end of the diagnostic process, the surgical plan included aortic valve replacement and annulus enlargement by Konno procedure (aortic annulus 14 mm), SVAS repair including coronary ostia, aortic arch repair including carotid arteries and three coronary artery bypass grafts. However, surgical mortality calculated with logistic euroSCORE tool (Velicki et al. 2014) was 45.7 %, considered too high to proceed with the correction.

Considered the low ejection fraction, the presence of a large apical scar and the mid-ventricular pressure gradient Carvedilol 6.25 mg twice daily was prescribed.

Six months later, the girl was clinically stable and without worsening angina, later she was lost to follow-up.

The patient’s parents gave the written consent to use her data for scientific purposes.

Discussion

Williams–Beuren syndrome is a rare genetic disorder, characterized by a typical facial dysmorphism, short stature, connective tissue abnormalities (including multi-district vascular disease), infantile hypercalcemia, mental and social disabilities. Vascular issues are mainly due to elastin gene mutation (Morris 2010). Most common heart condition associated to WBS is SVAS (Eronem et al. 2002).

Diffuse SVAS, younger age at correction (<2 years) and post-surgery residual aortic gradient and/or aortic valve disease are associated to poorer outcome (Deo et al. 2012; van Son et al. 1994).

Although aortoplasty is most often performed during pediatric age, deferred SVAS surgery to adult age has proven effective too (Coskun et al. 2007), the main predictor of late death being association with aortic valve disease.

Surgical outcome is heavily influenced by the presence of coronary tree anomalies (Eronem et al. 2002; Imamura et al. 2010; Hornik et al. 2015). As a consequence, preoperative coronary tree evaluation is mandatory in all patients with WBS (Imamura et al. 2010).

Which represents the best technique (cardiac catheterization, cardiac MRI, multi-slice computed tomographic angiography) to perform coronary artery tree evaluation in such patients is still controversial (Imamura et al. 2010).

In our patient, the risk of catheterization-associated mortality due to intraprocedural fatal arrhythmias and/or cardiac arrest was esteemed too high, also considering poor patient compliance which would have needed deep sedation to accomplish the procedure (Krous et al. 2008; Bennett et al. 2005). For such reason, a non-invasive imaging technique was chosen to assess coronary tree anatomy, avoiding sedation or anesthesia. Cardiac MRI was preferred because of its capacity to supply additional information about myocardial fibrosis, left and right ventricular functional and volumetric evaluation, as well as aortic and pulmonary arteries morphology.

The presented case is of educational value since it was associated with diffuse, multiple-site coronary artery tree involvement, a rather rare co-morbidity in WBS. Diffuse coronary artery tree disease was likely responsible for patient’s massive apical myocardial infarction associated with severe depression of left ventricular function. Left ventricular outflow tract was also affected, with severe hypoplasia of aortic annulus and ascending aorta, up to left carotid artery root (see Fig. 2).

Conclusions

SVAS surgical correction with aortoplasty in WBS patients is feasible with acceptably low mortality and good outcome when performed on time and in absence of distal coronary artery tree involvement (Eronem et al. 2002; Coskun et al. 2007). Coronary ostial stenosis in WBS patients is usually due to SVAS and aortic wall fibrosis at the sino-tubular junction.

In our patient, multiple-site coronary artery tree involvement was detected, a rather unusual co-morbidity in WBS; surgical management of such condition would have required multiple coronary bypass grafts (CABG). The needing of potentially multiple CABG, extensive aortoplasty, and carotid artery patch plasty, in the setting of a severely impaired left ventricular systo-diastolic function and reduced LVEF made surgical risk unacceptably high.

Abbreviations

ECG: 

electrocardiogram

WBS: 

Williams–Beuren syndrome

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

LVEF: 

left ventricular ejection fraction

FISH: 

fluorescence in situ hybridization

SVAS: 

supravalvular aortic stenosis

CABG: 

coronary bypass grafts

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TS took care of the patient and wrote the first draft of this manuscript; EV took care of the patient and contributed in writing the manuscript; BC performed echocardiographies, and took part in reviewing the manuscript; ER performed cardiac MRI, and helped in the critical review of literature about Williams–Beuren syndrome; OM acted as team supervisor and contributed to the final review of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Woman and Child Health, Medical School, University of Padua

References

  1. Bennett D, Marcus R, Stokes M (2005) Incidents and complications during pediatric cardiac catheterization. Paediatr Anaesth 15:1083–1088Google Scholar
  2. Coskun TS, Coskun OK, El Arousy M, Blanz U, Bockhorst K, Bairaktaris A, Kececioglu D, Körfer R (2007) Surgical repair of congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis in adult. ASAIO J 53:e5–e6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Deo SV, Burkhart HM, Schaff HV, Li Z, Stensrud PE, Olson TM, Connolly HM, Dearani JA (2012) Late outcomes for surgical repair of supravalvar aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 94:854–859View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Eronem M, Peippo M, Hiippala A, Raatikka M, Arvio M, Johansson R, Kähkönen M (2002) Cardiovascular manifestation in 75 patients with Williams syndrome. J Med Genet 39:554–558View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hornik CP, Collins RT 2nd, Jaquiss RD, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Pasquali SK, Wallace AS, Hill KD (2015) Adverse cardiac events in children with Williams syndrome undergoing cardiovascular surgery: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149(6):1516–1522View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Imamura M, Prodhan P, Dossey AM, Jaquiss RD (2010) Reoperation after supravalvular, aortic stenosis repair. Ann Thorac Surg 90(6):2016–2022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Krous HF, Wahl C, Chadwick AE (2008) Sudden unexpected death in a toddler with Williams syndrome. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 4:240–245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Morris CA (2010) Introduction: Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 154C:203–208View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. van Son JA, Danielson GK, Puga FJ, Schaff HV, Rastogi A, Edwards WD, Feldt RH (1994) Supravalvular aortic stenosis. Long-term results of surgical treatment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 107(1):103–114. (Discussion 114–115) Google Scholar
  10. Velicki L, Cemerlic-Adjic N, Pavlovic K, Mihajlovic BB, Bankovic D, Mihajlovic B, Fabri M (2014) Clinical performance of the EuroSCORE II compared with the previous EuroSCORE iterations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 62:288–297View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Serena et al. 2015