Open Access

Identification of a novel ovine LH-beta promoter region, which dramatically enhances its promoter activity

SpringerPlus20154:466

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1182-5

Received: 17 December 2014

Accepted: 24 July 2015

Published: 1 September 2015

Abstract

The luteinizing hormone beta subunit (LH-beta) gene plays a critical role in reproduction. In order to characterize and analyze the promoter region of LH-beta in sheep, a genomic library was constructed in phage lambda gt 10 and screened. A novel region of 1,224 bp upstream from the targeted LH-beta gene was identified. Blasting this sequence showed a perfect homology for the first 721 bp sequence with an upstream ovine LH-beta sequence in the database. However, the remaining 5′-503 bp showed no sequence matching. DNA from Moroccan breeds was isolated and the whole region was amplified and confirmed by sequencing. To further confirm the promoter activity of this region, an in vitro analysis using a luciferase assay was carried out. An increase in the promoter activity of the whole region was demonstrated compared to the empty vector. More interestingly, the unpublished region significantly enhanced the promoter activity compared to the known region alone. To predict putative transcription factor binding-sites (TFBSs), an in silico analysis was performed using the TFSEARCH program. The region features many TFBSs and contains two palindrome sequences of 17- and 18-bp. Taken together, a novel region was identified and confirmed in sheep which contained a promoter activity rich with binding sites for a putative regulatory element as shown in silico.

Keywords

ReproductionLH-betaPromoterLuciferase assay

Background

Sheep breeding in Morocco plays an important role in several areas of society, such as in traditional life and in the economy, and it also represents the principle source for red meat. Luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are considered as the main hormones which directly regulate reproductive performance (Campbell et al. 1999; Mullen et al. 2013). Genetic factors were known to affect directly or indirectly the level of theses hormones. In Booroola, a FecB locus was recently identified as controlling breeding performance in this breed and evidence demonstrated the effect of a FecB genotype within a specific neonatal period on the plasma levels of FSH and LH in ewe and ram lambs of this breed (McNatty et al. 1994; Isaacs et al. 1995; Heath et al. 1996). Here we hypothesized that these hormones could be considered as important downstream targets for several upstream genetic variants in sheep, especially those located in their own promoter regions. The hormones belong to the glycoprotein heterodimers family, which consist of a common alpha subunit and a unique beta subunit that gives each hormone its biological and immunological specificity, and encoded by a single-copy gene (Pierce and Parsons 1981).

In this study we focused on lutropin hormone, and more particularly the beta subunit (LH-beta) which is secreted by the anterior pituitary (Sairam and Li 1975; Counis et al. 1993; Moumni et al. 1994; Lerrant et al. 1995; Pelletier et al. 1995). This hormone plays a determinant role in reproduction where it stimulates gonadal steroidogenesis and gametogenesis (Ma et al. 2004). Furthermore, it has been shown that the LH-beta subunit gene reveals changes and polymorphisms even within species (Maston and Ruvolo 2002; Alevizaki and Huhtaniemi 2002). As such, the characterization of the LH-beta promoter region in sheep is of crucial importance.

In this paper we aimed to identify and characterize the promoter region of LH-beta.

Results

Identification of a novel promoter sequence region in the LH-beta gene

The LH-beta gene was cloned from a sheep genomic library, which was constructed in phage lambda gt 10 and screened. Six clones were selected and the corresponding DNA products were sequenced and analyzed using a Blast program. The analysis of the identified clone showed a perfect homology with the sequence of ovine LH-beta published in the database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, Brown et al. 1993). However, our identified sequence contained an additional promoter fragment of 503 bp (in the 5′ side), which has not yet been published (Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Figure S1 in the supporting information).
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the promoter region of the LH beta gene from a library screening of the Moroccan sheep database sequence: Homology sequence analysis revealed that the two sequences shared more than 96% homology with the reference sequence available in the database after alignment (Brown et al. 1993).

Enhancement of the promoter activity by the novel identified region

In order to test whether the unpublished novel promoter region is relevant for the promoter activity, fragments including either published, unpublished or the whole promoter region were amplified on genomic DNA from Moroccan sheep and analyzed using luciferase assays. As expected, the published region alone showed a higher promoter activity when compared to the empty vector. The novel unpublished region alone demonstrated a moderate increase in promoter activity compared to the empty vector. However, when both fragments (published and unpublished) were combined a 65% enhancement of the promoter activity was shown compared to that seen with the formerly published promoter region (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Investigation of LH-beta promoter region activity in Moroccan sheep. The promoter region including the published, unpublished and entire regions were amplified and analyzed for promoter activity using the luciferase assay. The luciferase gene alone was used as a negative control. The position of the two palindromic sequences is also shown. P-values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001).

Prediction of relevant regulatory elements within the promoter region using in silico bioinformatics tools

The TFSEARCH in silico program was used to predict potential regulatory elements within the whole region containing previously and newly identified regions. The analysis of the whole region revealed more than 30 putative regulatory elements (Figs. 3, 4). In addition, two extended perfect palindrome sequences of 17- and 18-bp were also identified. Palindromic sequences are thought to be regulatory sites for steroid hormones (Aumais et al. 1996).
Fig. 3

In-silico transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) analysis of the whole promoter region of the LH beta gene. The in silico analysis of the promoter region was carried out using the TFSEARCH software program. The localization of each TF is shown in the figure according to its position from the ATG start codon. The first (unpublished) part of the promoter is shown.

Fig. 4

In-silico transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) analysis of the whole promoter region of the LH beta gene. The in silico analysis of the promoter region was carried out using the TFSEARCH software program. The localization of each TF is shown in the figure according to its position from the ATG start codon. The second (published) part of the promoter is shown.

Discussion

The LH-beta gene encodes for a key glycoprotein hormone which is expressed in the pituitary gland and which regulates steroid synthesis in the testes and ovaries. As such it plays a decisive role in the development and maturation of sexual organs (Tremblay and Drouin 1999; Walsh and Shupnik 2009).

Genetic factors affecting the level of these hormones are functionally relevant and may explain variations in reproductive performance seen across many mammalian species. To understand the role of LH-beta hormone levels in reproduction, previous studies have tried to increase or decrease the level of this hormone in various mammalian species. Mice deficient in LH-beta were found to be infertile in both sexes (Ma et al. 2004; Kumar 2005). The LH-beta knockout males demonstrated reduced testes size (by 75% compared to controls). The LH-beta knockout females also demonstrated a hypogonadal phenotype where ovarian histology reveals abnormal antral and preovulatory follicles as well as the absence of corpora lutea (Ma et al. 2004; Kumar 2005). This mouse model represents an extreme case where the LH-beta is completely absent. However, moderate forms of hypogonadism can be also driven by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), especially in regulatory elements affecting regions that subsequently impact on the level of LH-beta either directly or indirectly. For example the Booroola breed is known for its high prolificacy worldwide (Davis et al. 1982; Montgomery et al. 2001; Souza and Baird 2004; Mishra et al. 2009; Ruoss et al. 2009; Reader et al. 2012).

A locus on chromosome 6 (FecB) has been identified to control the litter size of prolific breeds such as Booroola Merino, Garole and Javanese and to affect the plasma levels of FSH and LH within a specific neonatal period (McNatty et al. 1994; Isaacs et al. 1995; Heath et al. 1996; Wilson et al. 2001; Souza et al. 2001; Mulsant et al. 2001). Human mutations have been reported amongst three infertile men who showed an absence of FSH (Phillip et al. 1998; Layman et al. 2002; Lindstedt et al. 2005). Further functional studies demonstrated only 50% of the promoter activity of FSHB in the T allele carriers compared to the wild-type G allele carriers (Hoogendoorn et al. 2003; Grigorova et al. 2008). As such, the level of FSH and LH is crucial in reproduction, and screening for novel sequences especially in the promoter regions for both hormones is of major importance.

In this study we focused on the luteinizing hormone beta subunit (LH-beta) where our intention was to characterize the promoter region of the LH-beta gene. After screening of a genomic library a novel additional upstream promoter region was identified. This sequence was used as a template to design primers and amplify the corresponding entire promoter region on DNA isolated from Moroccan sheep. The amplified sequence shares 96% homology with the sequence from the screened library and 99% homology with the sequence published in the database. This difference may be explained by the high level of heterogeneity seen amongst sheep breeds worldwide. High intra-species genetic variability has indeed been reported between Tunisian (Khaldi et al. 2010), Egyptian (Mahfouz et al. 2008) Brazilian (Paiva et al. 2005) and Maltese breeds (Blundell and Felice 2006).

To test whether the unpublished upstream 503 bp promoter region displays promoter activity, we used the in vitro luciferase assay for this region or combined with the published region. Interestingly, the whole promoter region including the novel unpublished region demonstrated a much higher increase in promoter activity compared to the published region alone. This sequence can certainly be used in the future to test for SNPs within the LH-beta promoter that might regulate LH-beta transcription in cis and which may therefore explain variations in reproduction performance amongst different sheep breeds.

In order to understand at a molecular level whether this region includes relevant transcription factors (TF), we performed in silico analysis of the whole promoter region of LH-beta to predict regulatory elements using the TFSEARCH program. Interestingly, more than 30 regulatory elements were identified as well as two previously described perfect palindromes of 17 and 18 bp length. All these in silico identified regulatory elements require further in vitro or in vivo confirmation. Palindromic sequences are known to play a key role in sites regulated by steroid hormones (Aumais et al. 1996). The re-identification of the two palindromic sequences by the software program we used confirms the effectiveness of the program. Moreover, additional potential TF binding sites were also found in the unpublished region to play a role in reproduction, a fact, which supports our hypothesis regarding the decisive role of LH-beta in reproduction. Amongst these the transcription factors GATA-1, GATA-2, AML1a, P300, CBP, Egr-1 and SP1 have all been characterized (LaVoie 2003; Viger et al. 2004). As such genetic variations within these regulatory element sites could conceivably influence the transcription of LH-beta transcription und in turn the levels of secreted hormone.

Conclusion

In this work we screened and identified a novel promoter region for LH-beta. We confirmed and functionally tested the relevance of this novel region using the in vitro luciferase assay. Using in silico analysis, novel regulatory elements that may play a role in the regulation of LH-beta were predicted, and these are also in need of further functional analysis.

Methods

Ethical guidelines

Animal experiments were carried out according to the guidelines stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching of Meknès-Tafilalet, Morocco.

Screening of the sheep genomic library

A genomic library was constructed with sheep DNA and cloned into phage lambda gt10 using a BamHI restriction enzyme site. Approximately six million clones were then plated onto agar media transfecting E. coli C600 and C600-Hfl. The first strain provides an estimate of the total number of phages obtained, the second allows us to estimate the amount of recombinants. The library was then screened with the ovine LH-beta cDNA labeled with 32P using the random priming method (d’Angelo-Bernard et al. 1990). Six positive clones were then identified and isolated. They underwent several purification steps and were then sub-cloned into the vector pUC 19 and sequenced using Sanger method.

DNA isolation

For DNA isolation, blood samples were collected from a Moroccan sheep and incubated in lysis buffer containing NaCl 75 mM, EDTA 80 mM (pH = 8), SDS 0.5%, Tris–HCl (pH = 8) and 200 μg/ml of Proteinase K at 50°C with shaking for 3 h until complete digestion. The genomic DNA was gently extracted twice; with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform (3:1) V/V (chloroform saturated with isoamylic alcohol 42:1 V/V). A centrifugation for 15 min at 2,800×g was then performed after which the DNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated using 1/10 of 3 M NaAc (pH = 6) and 0.8 volumes of isopropanol. The DNA was then washed twice with 70% ethanol at room temperature and left to dry. The DNA was then resuspended in TE (Tris–EDTA) buffer and stored at −20°C. DNA concentration and purity were determined using a UV spectrophotometer at 260 and 280 nm.

PCR amplification

Fragments containing the unpublished region (503 bp), the published region (721 bp) or both together (1,224 bp) from the LH-beta promoter sheep were amplified using PCR and the primer pairs were designed from the sequence of the ovine LH beta gene obtained through the screening of the genomic library (Table 1). kpnI and SacI restrictions enzyme sites were added to the 5′ end of the primers. PCR products were obtained from the amplified genomic DNA of different samples using the 5′PRIME PCR Mastermix kit (VWR International GmbH, Germany). The products were separated by electrophoresis in a low melting-point agarose gel and visualized using SYBR-Green I (Invitrogen). The expected PCR products were then cut from the gel and purified using the NucleoSpin® Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel).
Table 1

List of primers used for generating the different lengths of the promoter regions

Forward LH-KpnI

Reverse LH-SacI

5′-ggtaccTTTGCTGGGTTTGGTTCC-3′

5′-gagctcCCTTGGTGCCTCCCCTGCTGTGTTC-3′

5′-ggtaccTGTGCCCTCCTCATCCTG-3′

5′-gagctcGAGTTAAAGAGCCTAAATCACCCTC-3′

5′-ggtaccTGTGCCCTCCTCATCCTG-3′

5′-gagctcCCTTGGTGCCTCCCCTGCTGTGTTC-3′

Cloning into the TOPO vector

PCR fragments were cloned into the pCR®2.1-TOPO® vector using the TOPO TA Cloning Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Plasmids were then isolated using the Miniprep Kit as described by the manufacturer (QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, Qiagen) and stored at −20°C until sequencing.

Sequencing

Sequencing of PCR products was performed on both strands using a commercial sequencing service (Seqlab, Goettingen, Germany).

Promoter sequence analysis

The alignment program (blast program) was used for DNA sequence comparison. TFSEARCH: Searching Transcription Factor Binding Sites (v.1.3; Yutaka Akiyama, Kyoto University Real World Computing Partnership, Japan) was used to search for transcription binding sites.

Plasmid constructs

The three cloned LH-beta promoter fragments were cut from the pCR®2.1-TOPO® vector (Invitrogen) using kpnI and SacI restriction enzymes and inserted into the pGL4.10 reporter plasmid (Promega). All sequences were verified both by restriction digestion analysis and direct sequencing. Sequencing was performed on both strands using a commercial sequencing service (Seqlab, Goettingen, Germany).

Cell culture

For the expression of ovine LH-beta promoter gene, a non-endocrine cell line, Human Embryonic Kidney cells (HEK293), was used (Jiang et al. 1999; Lamminen et al. 2002). HEK293 were cultured in high glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium GLUTAMAX, pyruvate (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (PAA) and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom) in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

Cell transfection

The constructs were transfected into HEK293 cells using TransFectin reagent (BIO-RAD). HEK293 cells were plated into 24-well tissue culture plates (Nunc) at 2 × 105 cells per well in 1 ml of the appropriate complete growth medium 18–24 h prior to transfection. Cells were transfected using TransFectin reagent at 60–80% confluency in antibiotic-free medium according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used 2 µg of constructs and 30 ng of the pGL4.74 vector that expresses Renilla luciferase under the control of a HSV-TK promoter as an internal control to normalize variations in transfection efficiency. After 24 h the media was changed and the cells were incubated further for 48 h. TransFectin reagent was used for each transfection reaction.

Luciferase assay

After 48 h of transfection HEK293 cells were washed twice with PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) and harvested using 100 µl of l× Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega). Cell extracts were transferred into a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and clarified by centrifugation for 1 min at 13,000×g and room temperature. Complete cell lysis was achieved using one freeze–thaw cycle that consisted of incubation at −80°C followed by a rapid thawing at 37°C. 25 µl of the supernatants from each sample were transferred to a white 96 well plate (Costar). Activity of firefly and Renilla luciferase was measured after 24–48 h incubation using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the transfection experiments were carried out in triplicate, and in at least three independent experiments.

Statistical analysis

In order to control for transfection efficiency and cell recovery, the luciferase activity was normalized according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All the experiments were performed three times independently (at least), and each of which measured in triplicates. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For statistical analyses we used the unpaired t-test (GraphPad Prism, Version 6.0 d). P-values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

RA carried over all experiments in the Lab. including sequencing, alignment of the sequences, luciferase assays as well as drafted the manuscript. ZA contributed to the sequence alignment, analysis of the luciferase assay data and drafted the manuscript. JE contributed to the analysis of the results, editing, correction and drafted the manuscript. MM carried out the screening, alignment, analysis of the sequences as well as editing, correction and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our gratitude to the agriculturists and abattoirs who allowed us to obtain samples of blood from their sheep. We also wish to express our sincere gratitude to Miss Sandra Wrobel for her technical support and kind help, and to Professor Mohammed Diouri at Moulay Ismail University for his advice and support. My sincere thanks are also directed to Professor Frank Kaiser for his fruitful advice and discussion during this work. This work was funded by a DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst) Sub Sandwich Program in collaboration with the Department of Integrative und Experimental Genomics at the University of Luebeck, Maria-Goeppert-Str. 1, 23562 Luebeck, Germany, and the Faculty of Sciences Department of Biology, Moulay Ismail University, BP 11201 Zitoune 50,000 Meknes, Morocco. I would also like to thank Dr. Julian P. Keogh for his editing and assessment of the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics (IIEG), Luebeck University, Luebeck
(2)
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismail University

References

  1. Alevizaki M, Huhtaniemi I (2002) Structure–function relationships of glycoprotein hormones; lessons from mutations and polymorphisms of the thyrotrophin and gonadotrophin subunit genes. Hormones (Athens) 1:224–232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Aumais JP, Lee HS, DeGannes C, Horsford J, White JH (1996) Function of directly repeated half-sites as response elements for steroid hormone receptors. J Biol Chem 271:12568–12577. doi:10.1074/jbc.271.21.12568 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Blundell R, Felice AE (2006) Detection of new genomic landmarks in the maltese goat using Rapd PCR. J Anim Vet Adv 5:602–607Google Scholar
  4. Brown P, McNeilly JR, Wallace RM, McNeilly AS, Clark AJ (1993) Characterization of the ovine LH beta-subunit gene: the promoter directs gonadotrope-specific expression in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Endocrinol 93:157–165View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell BK, Dobson H, Baird DT, Scaramuzzi RJ (1999) Examination of the relative role of FSH and LH in the mechanism of ovulatory follicle selection in sheep. J Reprod Fertil 117:355–367. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1170355 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Counis R, Bouamoud N, Lerrant Y, Starzec A, Moumni M, Kottler ML, Garrel G, Bérault A, Bergametti F (1993) Recent data on the gonadoliberin receptor and the neuropeptide control mechanisms for gene expression of gonadotropin hormones. Contracept Fertil Sex 21:773–779Google Scholar
  7. d’Angelo-Bernard G, Moumni M, Jutisz M, Counis R (1990) Cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for the precursor of the beta subunit of ovine luteinizing hormone. Nucleic Acids Res 18:2175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis GH, Montgomery GW, Allison AJ, Kelly RW, Bray AR (1982) Segregation of a major gene influencing fecundity in progeny of Booroola sheep. N Z J Agric Res 25:525–529. doi:10.1080/00288233.1982.10425216 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Grigorova M, Punab M, Ausmees K, Laan M (2008) FSHB promoter polymorphism within evolutionary conserved element is associated with serum FSH level in men. Hum Reprod 23:2160–2166. doi:10.1093/humrep/den216 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Heath DA, Caldani M, McNatty KP (1996) Relationship between the number of immunostaining gonadotropes and the plasma concentrations of gonadotrophins in ewes with and without the FecBB gene. J Reprod Fertil 106:73–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoogendoorn B, Coleman SL, Guy CA, Smith K, Bowen T, Buckland PR, O’Donovan MC (2003) Functional analysis of human promoter polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet 12:2249–2254. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddg246 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Isaacs KL, McNatty KP, Condell L, Shaw L, Heath DA, Hudson NL, Littlejohn RP, McLeod BJ (1995) Plasma FSH, LH and immunoreactive inhibin concentrations in FecBB/FecBB and FecB+/FecB+ Booroola ewes and rams from birth to 12 months of age. J Reprod Fertil 103:89–97. doi:10.1530/jrf.0.1030089 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang M, Pakarinen P, Zhang F-P, El-Hefnawy T, Koskimies P, Pettersson K, Huhtaniemi I (1999) A common polymorphic allele of the human luteinizing hormone β-subunit gene: additional mutations and differential function of the promoter sequence. Hum Mol Genet 8:2037–2046. doi:10.1093/hmg/8.11.2037 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Khaldi ZB, Rekik B, Haddad L, Zourgui SS, Souid S (2010) Genetic characterization of three ovine breeds in Tunisia using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Livest Res Rural Dev 22Google Scholar
  15. Kumar TR (2005) What have we learned about gonadotropin function from gonadotropin subunit and receptor knockout mice? Reproduction 130:293–302. doi:10.1530/rep.1.00660 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamminen T, Jiang M, Manna PR, Pakarinen P, Simonsen H, Herrera RJ, Huhtaniemi I (2002) Functional study of a recombinant form of human LHβ-subunit variant carrying the Gly102Ser mutation found in Asian populations. Mol Hum Reprod 8:887–892. doi:10.1093/molehr/8.10.887 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. LaVoie HA (2003) The role of GATA in mammalian reproduction. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 228:1282–1290Google Scholar
  18. Layman LC, Porto ALA, Xie J, da Motta LACR, da Motta LDC, Weiser W, Sluss PM (2002) FSH beta gene mutations in a female with partial breast development and a male sibling with normal puberty and azoospermia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3702–3707. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.8.8724 Google Scholar
  19. Lerrant Y, Kottler ML, Bergametti F, Moumni M, Blumberg-Tick J, Counis R (1995) Expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor gene is altered by GnRH agonist desensitization in a manner similar to that of gonadotropin beta-subunit genes in normal and castrated rat pituitary. Endocrinology 136:2803–2808Google Scholar
  20. Lindstedt G, Nyström E, Matthews C, Ernest I, Janson PO, Chatterjee K (2005) Follitropin (FSH) deficiency in an infertile male due to FSHβ gene mutation. A syndrome of normal puberty and virilization but under-developed testicles with azoospermia, low FSH but high lutropin and normal serum testosterone concentrations. CCLM 36:663–665. doi:10.1515/CCLM.1998.118 Google Scholar
  21. Ma X, Dong Y, Matzuk MM, Kumar TR (2004) Targeted disruption of luteinizing hormone β-subunit leads to hypogonadism, defects in gonadal steroidogenesis, and infertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17294–17299. doi:10.1073/pnas.0404743101 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahfouz ER, Othman OE, El Nahas SM, El Barody MA (2008) Genetic variation between some Egyptian sheep breeds using RAPD-PCR. Res J Cell Mol Biol 2:46–52Google Scholar
  23. Maston GA, Ruvolo M (2002) Chorionic gonadotropin has a recent origin within primates and an evolutionary history of selection. Mol Biol Evol 19:320–335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. McNatty KP, Hudson NL, Shaw L, Moore L (1994) Plasma concentrations of FSH, LH, thyroid-stimulating hormone and growth hormone after exogenous stimulation with GnRH, TRH and GHRH in Booroola ewes that are homozygous carriers or non-carriers of the FecB gene. J Reprod Fertil 102:177–183View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishra AK, Arora AL, Kumar S, Prince LLL (2009) Studies on effect of Booroola (FecB) genotype on lifetime ewes’ productivity efficiency, litter size and number of weaned lambs in Garole × Malpura sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 113:293–298. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.06.002 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Montgomery GW, Galloway SM, Davis GH, McNatty KP (2001) Genes controlling ovulation rate in sheep. Reproduction 121:843–852View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Moumni M, Kottler ML, Counis R (1994) Nucleotide sequence analysis of mRNAs predicts that rat pituitary and gonadal gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor proteins have identical primary structure. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 200:1359–1366. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1994.1601 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullen MP, Cooke DJ, Crow MA (2013) Structural and functional roles of FSH and LH as glycoproteins regulating reproduction in mammalian species. In: Vizcarra J (ed) Gonadotropin, Chap 8. InTech, pp 155–180. ISBN:980-953-307-132-4Google Scholar
  29. Mulsant P, Lecerf F, Fabre S, Schibler L, Monget P, Lanneluc I, Pisselet C, Riquet J, Monniaux D, Callebaut I, Cribiu E, Thimonier J, Teyssier J, Bodin L, Cognié Y, Chitour N, Elsen J-M (2001) Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola Mérino ewes. PNAS 98:5104–5109. doi:10.1073/pnas.091577598 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Paiva SR, Silvério VC, Egito AA, McManus C, Faria DA de, Mariante A da S, Castro SR, Albuquerque M do SM, Dergam JA (2005) Genetic variability of the Brazilian hair sheep breeds. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40:887–893. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2005000900008
  31. Pelletier J, Counis R, de Reviers MM, Moumni M, Tillet Y (1995) Changes in LH beta-gene and FSH beta-gene expression in the ram pars tuberalis according to season and castration. Cell Tissue Res 281:127–133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillip M, Arbelle JE, Segev Y, Parvari R (1998) Male hypogonadism due to a mutation in the gene for the β-subunit of follicle-stimulating hormone. N Engl J Med 338:1729–1732. doi:10.1056/NEJM199806113382404 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierce JG, Parsons TF (1981) Glycoprotein hormones: structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 50:465–495. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.002341 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Reader KL, Haydon LJ, Littlejohn RP et al (2012) Booroola BMPR1B mutation alters early follicular development and oocyte ultrastructure in sheep. Reprod Fertil Dev 24:353–361. doi:10.1071/RD11095 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruoss C, Tadros A, O’Shea T, McFarlane J, Almahbobi G (2009) Ovarian follicle development in Booroola sheep exhibiting impaired bone morphogenetic protein signalling pathway. Reproduction 138:689–696. doi:10.1530/REP-09-0190 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sairam MR, Li CH (1975) Human pituitary lutropin. Isolation, properties, and the complete amino acid sequence of the beta-subunit. Biochim Biophys Acta 412:70–81View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Souza CJH, Baird DT (2004) The Booroola (FecB) mutation is associated with smaller adrenal glands in young adult ewes. Reprod Biomed Online 8:414–418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Souza CJ, MacDougall C, MacDougall C et al (2001) The Booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1 B (BMPR1B) gene. J Endocrinol 169:R1–R6. doi:10.1677/joe.0.169R001 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tremblay JJ, Drouin J (1999) Egr-1 is a downstream effector of GnRH and synergizes by direct interaction with Ptx1 and SF-1 to enhance luteinizing hormone? Gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 19:2567–2576Google Scholar
  40. Viger RS, Taniguchi H, Robert NM, Tremblay JJ (2004) The 25th volume: role of the GATA family of transcription factors in andrology. J Androl 25:441–452. doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02813.x Google Scholar
  41. Walsh HE, Shupnik MA (2009) Proteasome Regulation of Dynamic Transcription Factor Occupancy on the GnRH-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone β-Subunit Promoter. Mol Endocrinol 23:237–250. doi:10.1210/me.2008-0098 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson T, Wu X-Y, Juengel JL, Ross IK, Lumsden JM, Lord EA, Dodds KG, Walling GA, McEwan JC, O’Connell AR, McNatty KP, Montgomery GW (2001) Highly prolific Booroola sheep have a mutation in the intracellular kinase domain of bone morphogenetic protein IB receptor (ALK-6) that is expressed in both oocytes and granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 64:1225–1235. doi:10.1095/biolreprod64.4.1225 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Aherrahrou et al. 2015