Open Access

Association of glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) genes with chronic myeloid leukemia

  • Yaya Kassogue1,
  • Hind Dehbi1,
  • Meryem Quachouh2,
  • Asma Quessar2,
  • Said Benchekroun2 and
  • Sellama Nadifi1Email author
SpringerPlus20154:210

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0966-y

Received: 10 December 2014

Accepted: 2 April 2015

Published: 1 May 2015

Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as most of cancers results from a complex interaction between genetic or non genetic factors. Exposures to xenobiotics endogenous or exogenous associated with a reduced individual ability in detoxifying activity, constitutes a risk of developing cancer. It is known that polymorphism of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) genes affects the detoxification of xenobiotics. Thus, we conducted a case-control study in which 92 patients (Mean age ± SD, 40.62 ± 12.7 years) with CML and 93 healthy unrelated controls (Mean age ± SD, 41.38 ± 13.4 years) have participated. GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes were determined by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Logistic regression was used to assess the possible link between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and CML as well as between combined genotypes and CML. GSTM1 null genotype frequency was slightly higher in patients than control (48.9% vs. 40.9%) but, it was not associated with CML (OR 95% CI, 1.4, 0.78-2.48; p = 0.271). Moreover, GSTT1 null genotype frequency showed a similar trend between patients and control (17.4% vs. 9.7%; OR 95% CI, 1.97, 0.82-4.71; p = 0.13). Surprisingly, GSTT1 null genotype was significantly associated with the risk of CML in males (OR 95% CI, 5, 1.25-20.1; p = 0.023). The combined GSTM1 present/GSTT1 null genotype was found to have a limited effect against the risk of CML (OR 95% CI, 0.3, 0.08-0.99; p = 0.049). Our findings have shown that GSTT1 null genotype might be a risk factor of CML in males. While, GSTT1 present genotype might be considered as protective against CML. However, further studies with a large sample size are needed to confirm our findings.

Keywords

Glutathione S-transferases GSTM1 GSTT1 CML

Introduction

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a blood cancer secondary to the presence of the reciprocal translocation t(9; 22)(q34; q11) or BCR-ABL gene fusion causing a malignant proliferation of hematopoietic cells (Deininger et al. 2000). However, The etiology of CML like most of cancers, results from a complex interaction between several factors, among others exposure to ionizing and non ionizing radiation, carcinogens present in the environment such as benzene, smoke and pesticides (Salagovic et al. 2000; Gervasini et al. 2007). These factors considered as genotoxics may affect the biotransformation of xenobiotics and cause damage to the DNA of hematopoietic cells and foster the occurrence of CML (Belitsky & Yakubovskaya 2008). Obviously, depending to the genetic constitution on the individual level, the body prevents such damage, thanks to enzymes which play a major role in the activation/detoxification of carcinogens, repair of DNA damage and programming of mutant cells to apoptosis (Belitsky & Yakubovskaya 2008; Hayes and Pulford 1995; Fang et al. 2013). It is noteworthy that hereditary differences which affect an individual’s ability to metabolize xenobiotics represent significant factors in predisposition to develop cancer such as CML (Taioli 1999; Siraj et al. 2008). Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes of phase II, which participate in cellular detoxification by converting active procarcinogenic metabolites of phase I enzymes (cytochrome P450) into inactive metabolites and soluble glutathione, easily execretable. Nowadays, eight classes of GSTs have been identified, including alpha (GSTA), mu (GSTM) theta (GSTT), pi (GSTP), zeta (GSTZ), sigma (GSTS), kappa (GSTK) and omega (GSTO) (Mannervik et al. 1992). Among these, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes which have been mapped on chromosome 1p13.3 and 22q11.2 respectively, are the most studied (Pearson et al. 1993; Webb et al. 1996). It is known that deletions in GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes is associated with reduced or absence of enzyme activity (Hallier et al. 1993). Moreover, numerous studies have shown the link between the lack of enzyme activity in GSTM1 and GSTT1 and the susceptibility to develop various types of cancer, such as oral cancer, gastric cancer, bladder cancer, and CML in different ethnical groups worldwide (Bajpai et al. 2007; Sharma et al. 2013; Dunna et al. 2013; Ma et al. 2013; Dong et al. 2013; Bhat et al. 2012). Furthermore, other studies have found an association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions and the response to chemotherapy, such as disease free survival, overall survival or toxicity (Voso et al. 2002; Mossallam et al. 2006). Given the absence of data on the frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes in our population, we decided to carry out this case-control study with the aim to establish firstly their frequencies in the population and secondly estimate the possible link between the null genotypes and the occurrence of chronic myeloid leukemia in a sample of the Moroccan population.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was performed after approval of the local Ethics Committee and individual informed consent from patients and control. A total of 92 patients have participated. Patient’s selection was based on the presence of clinically-hematologic signs and Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL gene fusion (Baccarani et al. 2009). Patients were recruited in the department of Onco-Hematology of the Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco from 2011 to 2013. During the same period 93 unrelated healthy controls without a family history of cancer were recruited at the laboratory of genetic and molecular diseases, Faculty of Medicine, the Hassan II University in Casablanca. Four milliliters of venous blood were collected in EDTA tube and kept to minus 20°C till DNA extraction.

Genotyping of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism

Salting-out method was used to extract DNA from white blood cells (Miller et al. 1988). GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism were detected by using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in which BCL2 gene as an internal control was used. The PCR was carried out in a mixture containing 100 ng of genomic DNA, 1X of 5X GoTaq Flexi Buffer (Promega), 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 10 pM of each primer and 0.5 U of GoTaq polymerase (Promega) completed to 25 μl with molecular grade water. Forward and reverse primers were 5’-TTCCTTACTGGTCCTCACATCTC-3’ and 5’-TCACCGGATCATGGCCAGCA-3’ respectively, for GSTT1; 5'-GAACTCCCTGAAAAGCTAAAGC-3' and 5'- GTTGGGCTCAAATATACGGTGG-3', respectively for GSTM1. Forward and reverse primers for BCL2 gene were 5'-GCAATTCCGCATTTAATTCATGG-3' and 5'- GAAACAGGCCACGTAAAGCAAC-3', respectively (Voso et al. 2002). PCR amplification was performed with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 minute, 61°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 1 minute and a last extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel stained with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide. The GSTT1, GSTM1 and BCL2 produce 480 bp, 219 bp and 154 bp respectively. The presence of BCL2 without GSTT1 or GSTM1 reflects their deletion.

Statistical analysis

Logistic regression was used to assess the risk between GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes and the occurrence of CML. Odds ratio (OR) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% was calculated. The chi-square test was used to compare the genotype distribution between patients and control. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. We have used the statistical package SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

In this case-control study, we explored the frequency of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes in 92 CML patients and 93 controls. The patients were composed of 34 males (37%), 58 females (63%) with a mean age of 40.62 ± 12.7; range (18-76 years). However, the control was composed of 39 males (41.9%), 54 females (58.1) with a mean age of 41.38 ± 13.4; range (18-77). The frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes between patients and control are summarized in Table 1. We found that the GSTM1 null genotype was moderately more frequent in patients (48.9%) compared to control (40.9%), however, this difference was not statistically significant (OR 95% CI, 1.4, 0.78-2.48; p = 0.271). This observation has remained valid for the GSTT1 null genotype with a frequency of 17.4% in patients against 9.7% in the control group (OR 95% CI, 1.97, 0.82-4.71; p = 0.13) (Table 1). The combination of both polymorphisms shows that subjects carrying the GSTM1 present/GSTT1 null were associated with a limited effect (OR 95% CI, 0.3, 0.08-0.99; p = 0.049). Other types of combination showed no trend. The dual deletion which corresponds to GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes has been observed in 6 patients 6.5% against 5 control 5.4% Table 2. Surprisingly, the distribution of participants based on gender revealed that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the development of CML in males (OR 95% CI, 5, 1.25-20.1; p = 0.023) (Table 3). However, in females the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes did not appear to be associated with the occurrence of CML (Table 4).
Table 1

Distribution of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes between patients and control and evaluation of the risk of CML

GST polymorphism

Patients

Control

OR

P value

N (%)

N (%)

95% CI

GSTM1

    

Present

47 (51.1)

55 (59.1)

1

 

Null

45 (48.9)

38 (40.9)

1.4 (0.78-2.48)

0.271

GSTT1

    

Present

76 (82.6)

84 (90.3)

1

 

Null

16 (17.4)

9 (9.7)

1.97 (0.82-4.71)

0.13

Table 2

Risk assessment of CML between different combinations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes

GSTM1

GSTT1

Patients

Control

OR

P value

N (%)

N (%)

95% CI

Present

Present

37 (40.2)

51 (54.8)

1

 

Present

Null

10 (10.9)

4 (4.3)

0.3 (0.08-0.99)

0.049

Null

Present

39 (42.4)

33 (35.5)

0.61 (0.33-1.15)

0.128

Null

Null

6 (6.5)

5 (5.4)

0.61 (0.17-2.13)

0.434

Table 3

Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on the development of CML in males

GST polymorphism

Patients

Control

OR

P value

N (%)

N (%)

95% CI

GSTM1

    

Present

16 (47.1)

25 (64.1)

1

 

Null

18 (52.9)

14 (35.9)

2 (0.79-5.14)

0.145

GSTT1

    

Present

24 (70.6)

36 (92.3)

1

 

Null

10 (29.4)

3 (7.7)

5 (1.25-20.1)

0.023

Table 4

Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes on the development of CML in females

GST polymorphism

Patients

Control

OR

P value

N (%)

N (%)

95% CI

GSTM1

    

Present

31 (53.4)

30 (55.6)

1

 

Null

27 (46.6)

24 (44.4)

1.01 (0.52-2.3)

0.823

GSTT1

    

Present

52 (89.7)

48 (88.9)

1

 

Null

6 (10.6)

6 (11.1)

0.9 (0.28-3.06)

0.896

Discussion

The development of cancer results from an imbalance between exposure to carcinogens (endogenous and exogenous) and the capacity of various enzyme systems engaged in activation or in the detoxification of xenobiotics (Kawajiri et al. 1993). Interindividual genetic variation in xenobiotics metabolizing enzymes has been associated with cancer development (Taningher et al. 1999). Nowadays, many epidemiological studies have shown the implication of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism in tumorigenesis such as CML (Fang et al. 2013; Duggan et al. 2013).

In the current study, the GSTM1 null genotype frequency (40.9%) was comparable to that observed in Caucasians and Asians (40-62%) but higher than that observed in African-Americans ((16-36%). However, the frequency of GSTT1 null genotype (9.7%) in our population showed a similar trend to that observed in Caucasians (10-26%) but was less than that observed in Asians (35-52%) (Garte et al. 2001; Van der Logt et al. 2004). The frequency of the homologous deletion (GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes), synonymous of absence of enzyme activity was less than that observed in Caucasians (5.4% vs. 10.4%) and that of the Asian population (5.4% vs. 24.6%) (Garte et al. 2001). Trends in variability of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes within a given population might help to estimate the risk of subjects in the development of certain cancers.

In the current study, we noticed that the GSTM1 null genotype was slightly higher in patients (48.9%) than in control (40.9%); however, it was not associated with an increased risk to develop CML (OR 95% CI, 1.4, 0.78-2.48; p = 0.271) (Table 1). Furthermore, the estimation of CML risk, according to the gender of participants showed similar trends in males (OR 95% CI, 2, 0.79-5.14; p = 0.145) (Table 3) as well as in females (OR 95% CI, 1.01, 0.52-2.3; p = 0.823) (Table 4). Similar findings were observed in India with (OR 95% CI, 1.32, 0.73-2.40; p = 0.4295) (Bhat et al. 2012). Özten et al. 2012, also found no association between GSTM1 null genotype and CML (OR 95% CI, 1.11; 0.69-1.80; p = 0.714). A meta-analysis realized with a large number of participants confirmed these results (Zintzaras 2009). The analyze of these different results shows that GSTM1 null genotype seems not to be associated with the development of CML.

Overall, the GSTT1 null genotype was not found to be associated with the development of CML when males and females were pooled together (OR 95% CI, 1.97; 0.82-4.71; p = 0.13) (Table 1). A study carried in Japan, also failed to find any association between GSTT1 null genotype and CML (Hishida et al. 2005). Surprisingly, in considering participants according to gender, we have found a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and CML in males (OR 95% CI, 5; 1.25-20.1; p = 0.023) (Table 3) but not in females (OR 95% CI, 0.9; 0.28-3.06; p = 0.896) (Table 4). This finding might be explained by differences in xenobiotics exposure between males and females (e.g. Smoke, pesticides) or other genetic/non genetic factors specific to the host. Otherwise, a Turkish study reported an association between GSTT1 null genotype and CML (OR 95% CI, 2.82; 1.58-5.05; p < 0.001) (Taspinar et al. 2008). Another study done in India, also found that GSTT1 null genotype was associated with the development of CML (OR 95% CI, 2.67; 1.03-7.01) (Bajpai et al. 2007).

The combined GSTM1 present/GSTT1 null genotype was found to have a limited effect against the development of CML when compared to GSTM1 present/GSTT1 present genotype (OR 95% CI, 0.3, 0.08-0.99; p = 0.049). Anyway, this finding shows a marginal interaction, between GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes. (Zintzaras 2009) has reported a significant association between GSTM1 present/GSTT1 null genotype and CML. Elsewhere, we found that the GSTM1 null/GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with the development of CML when compared to GSTM1 present/GSTT1 present genotype (OR 95% CI, 0.61, 0.17-2.13; p = 0.434). In contrast, other authors have found that GSTM1 null/GSTT1 null genotype exposed significantly subjects to develop CML when compared to GSTM1 present/GSTT1 present genotype (Bhat et al. 2012; Özten et al. 2012), some authors, reported that subjects with GSTM1 present/GSTT1 null genotype were 2.5 times more likely to develop CML when compared to GSTM1 null/GSTT1 present genotype (Özten et al. 2012). The results from these authors show a possible interaction between GSTM1 and GSTT1.

Conclusion

To the best our knowledge, this is the first study on a Moroccan population, assessing the risk of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype carriers in the development of CML. This study has allowed to determine the frequency of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism in a sample of our population. In addition, we have noted that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the development of CML in males but not in females.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this study was obtained from the Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Genetics and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Medical School of Casablanca
(2)
Department of Onco-Hematology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital

References

  1. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J, Cervantes F, Deininger M, Gratwohl A, Guilhot F, Hochhaus A, Horowitz M, Hughes T, Kantarjian H, Larson R, Radich J, Simonsson B, Silver RT, Goldman J, Hehlmann R. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2014 Mar 29];27:6041–51. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19884523
  2. Bajpai P, Tripathi AK, Agrawal D. Increased frequencies of glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) null genotypes in Indian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia research [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2013 Nov 25];31:1359–63. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17420047
  3. Belitsky GA, Yakubovskaya MG (2008) Genetic polymorphism and variability of chemical carcinogenesis. Biochemistry Biokhimii͡a [Internet] 73:543–54, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605979 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat G, Bhat A, Wani A, Sadiq N, Jeelani S, Kaur R, Masood A, Ganai B (2012) Polymorphic variation in glutathione-S-transferase genes and risk of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the Kashmiri population. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP [Internet] 13:69–73, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22502716 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Deininger MWN, Goldman JM, Melo JV (2000) The molecular biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 96:3343–56Google Scholar
  6. Dong G, Tian Y, Chen S, Xu X, Zheng J, Li T (2013) Glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype is associated with oral cancer susceptibility in Asian populations. Tumor Biol 34:1753–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Duggan C, Ballard-Barbash R, Baumgartner RN, Baumgartner KB, Bernstein L, McTiernan A (2013) Associations between null mutations in GSTT1 and GSTM1, the GSTP1 Ile (105)Val polymorphism, and mortality in breast cancer survivors. Springerplus 2:450, doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunna NR, Vure S, Sailaja K, Surekha D, Raghunadharao D, Rajappa S, Vishnupriya S (2013) Deletion of GSTM1 and T1 genes as a risk factor for development of acute leukemia. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP [Internet] 14:2221–4, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23725116 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang J, Wang S, Zhang S, Su S, Song Z, Deng Y, et al. Association of the glutathione s-transferase m1, t1 polymorphisms with cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis. PloS One [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Nov 21];8:e78707. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3826727&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  10. Garte S, Gaspari L, Alexandrie A, Ambrosone C, Autrup H, Autrup JL, Baranova H, Bathum L, Benhamou S, Boffetta P, Bouchardy C, Breskvar K, Brockmoller J, Cascorbi I, Clapper ML, Coutelle C, Daly A, Dell'Omo M, Dolzan V, Dresler CM, Fryer A, Haugen A, Hein DW, Hildesheim A, Hirvonen A, Hsieh LL, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Kalina I, Kang D, Kihara M et al (2001) Metabolic Gene Polymorphism Frequencies in Control Populations Metabolic Gene Polymorphism Frequencies in Control Populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:1239–48Google Scholar
  11. Gervasini G, García-Martín E, Ladero JM, Pizarro R, Sastre J, Martínez C, García M, Diaz-Rubio M, Agúndez JA et al (2007) Genetic variability in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in primary liver, gastric and colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2013 Dec 12];7:1–7. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1931602&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  12. Hallier E, Langhof T, Dannappel D, Leutbecher M, Schröder K, Goergens HW, Müller A, Bolt HM (1993) Polymorphism of glutathione conjugation of methyl bromide, ethylene oxide and dichloromethane in human blood: influence on the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) in lymphocytes. Archives of toxicology [Internet] 67:173–8, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8494496 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes JD, Pulford DJ (1995) The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology [Internet] 30:445–600, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8770536 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hishida A, Terakura S, Emi N, Yamamoto K, Murata M, Nishio K, Sekido Y, Niwa T, Hamajima N, Naoe T. GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions, NQO1 C609T polymorphism and risk of chronic myelogenous leukemia in Japanese. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP [Internet]. 2005;6:251–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16235982
  15. Kawajiri K, Nakachi K, Imai K, Watanabe J, Hayashi S. The CYP1A1 gene and cancer susceptibility. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology [Internet]. 1993;14:77–87. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8103989
  16. Ma W, Zhuang L, Han B, Tang B (2013) Association between glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype and gastric cancer risk : a meta-analysis of 48 studies. PLoS One 8:60833View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mannervik B, Awasthi YC, Board PG, Hayes JD, Di Llo C, Ketterer B, Listowsky I, Morgenstern R, Muramatsu M, Pearson WR (1992) Nomenclature for human glutathione transferases. Biochem J 282:305–6Google Scholar
  18. Miller S, Dykes D, Polesky H (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16:1215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mossallam GI, Abdel Hamid TM, Samra MA. Glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in adult acute myeloid leukemia; its impact on toxicity and response to chemotherapy. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst [Internet]. 2006;18:264–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17671537
  20. Özten N, Sunguroğ A, Bosland M (2012) Variations in glutathione-S- transferase genes influence risk of chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol 30:150–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearson WR, Vorachek WR, Xu SJ, Berger R, Hart I, Vannais D, Patterson D (1993) Identification of class-mu glutathione transferase genes GSTM1-GSTM5 on human chromosome 1p13. Am J Human Genetics [Internet] 53:220–33, Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1682241&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract Google Scholar
  22. Salagovic J, Kalina I, Dudas M (2000) Genetic polymorphism of enzymes metabolizing xenobiotics as a factor in susceptibility to tumor development. Bratislavské lekárske listy [Internet] 101:512–21, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11187056 Google Scholar
  23. Sharma T, Jain S, Verma A, Sharma N, Gupta S, Arora VK, Dev Banerjee B (2013) Gene environment interaction in urinary bladder cancer with special reference to organochlorine pesticide: a case control study. Cancer Biomark 13:243–51Google Scholar
  24. Siraj AK, Ibrahim M, Al-Rasheed M, Abubaker J, Bu R, Siddiqui SU, et al. Polymorphisms of selected xenobiotic genes contribute to the development of papillary thyroid cancer susceptibility in Middle Eastern population. BMC medical genetics [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2013 Nov 22];9:1–9. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2492854&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  25. Taioli E (1999) International collaborative study on genetic susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:727–8Google Scholar
  26. Taningher M, Malacarne D, Izzotti A, Ugolini D, Parodi S. Drug metabolism polymorphisms as modulators of cancer susceptibility. Mutat Res [Internet]. 1999;436:227–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10354524
  27. Taspinar M, Aydos SE, Comez O, Elhan AH, Karabulut HG, Sunguroglu A. CYP1A1, GST gene polymorphisms and risk of chronic myeloid leukemia. Swiss Med Wkly [Internet]. 2008;138:12–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18224491
  28. Van der Logt EM, Bergevoet SM, Roelofs HMJ, Van Hooijdonk Z, Te Morsche RHM, Wobbes T, de Kok JB, Nagengast FM, Peters WH. Genetic polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and glutathione S-transferases and colorectal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2013 Dec 6];25:2407–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15319294
  29. Voso MT, D’Alo' F, Putzulu R, Mele L, Scardocci A, Chiusolo P, Latagliata R, Lo-Coco F, Rutella S, Pagano L, Hohaus S, Leone G. Negative prognostic value of glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1 and GSTT1) deletions in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2013 Nov 26];100:2703–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12351375
  30. Webb G, Vaska V, Coggan M, Board P. Chromosomal localization of the gene for the human theta class glutathione transferase (GSTT1). Genomics [Internet]. 1996;33:121–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8617495
  31. Zintzaras E (2009) Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 genes and susceptibility to chronic myeloid leukemia : a meta- analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 13:791–7View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kassogue et al.; licensee Springer. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.