- Technical note
- Open Access
Diagnostic challenge of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) associated with diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in head trauma
© Bueno González et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
- Received: 6 August 2014
- Accepted: 1 December 2014
- Published: 18 December 2014
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- Epidural Hematoma
- Intensive Care Unit Discharge
- Consensus Document
Dear Editor it is well known that many patients show a significant altered level of consciousness after head trauma, and they subsequently present neurological sequelae, without any relevant findings in the CT scan. This is often due to the presence of diffuse axonal injury (DAI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors associated with DAI, especially the occurrence of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH). We performed a retrospective analysis of 189 patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with severe traumatic brain injury, from 2008 to 2012. DAI was defined as a GCS score of 8 or less, lasting for more than 6 hours, with a normal CT or with small hemorrhages (<10 mm) in the CT and/or MRI (Chelly et al. 2011).
The incidence of DAI was 28%. Factors associated with a poor prognosis were, ≥ 5 hemorrhagic millimeter lesions, lesions in corpus callosum and/or in brain stem (p = 0.004. RR: 2.40), a motor GCS ≤3 at admission (p = 0.002. RR: 1.97) and the development of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) (p = 0.007. RR: 2).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between risk factors and diffuse axonal injury (DAI)
Higher energy traffic accidents
One of the worst outcome factors of DAI is PSH but it often remains unidentified due to the complexity of the diagnosis. Patients with DAI frequently develop this kind of crises and they are often misinterpreted. In our study the incidence of PSH was 19%, whereas the reported incidence varies from 8% and 33% (Lv et al. 2011). This broad variation is mainly originated from different inclusion criteria and definitions of PSH. Most studies are based in Baguley’s et al. definition (Baguley et al. 1999). A diagnosis of PSH required at least one daily paroxysm occurring for at least 3 consecutive days, and the exclusion of other causes such as withdrawal syndrome, epileptic seizures, and sepsis (Hörtnagl et al. 1980).
The diagnostic process has often been a significant challenge. Recently, an international and multidisciplinary consensus document was published (Baguley et al. 2014), aiming to i) to develop a conceptual definition; ii) to resolve confusion regarding the nomenclature, iii) to produce a consensus set of diagnostic criteria and iv) to develop a diagnostic tool for evaluating the presence and severity of the crisis. In this document the name of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) was proposed and was defined as “A recognized syndrome, in a subgroup of survivors of severe acquired brain injury, which involves simultaneous, paroxysmal transient increases in sympathetic (elevated heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, sweating) and motor (posturing) activity’. This process also developed a diagnostic tool consisting of two components: the probability of diagnosis (the Diagnosis Likelihood Tool [DLT]) and the severity of the clinical features (the Clinical Feature Scale [CFS]). The numerical output of these two components is added together to estimate the diagnostic likelihood of PSH. These components form the PSH Assessment Measure (PSH-AM) (Baguley et al. 2014). To date, this is the first scale that standardizes published diagnostic criteria and assesses the severity of the crisis. It is easy to apply in clinical practice and very useful to improve the efficiency of diagnosis. While we wait for preliminary results and validation studies, this consensus document solves what until now was a real diagnostic challenge.
- Baguley IJ, Nicholls JL, Felmingham KL, Crooks J, Gurka JA, Wade LD: Dysautonomia after traumatic brain injury: A forgotten syndrome? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999, 67(1):39-43. 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baguley IJ, Perkes IE, Fernandez-Ortega JF, Rabinstein AA, Dolce G, Hendricks HT: Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after acquired brain injury: consensus on conceptual definition, nomenclature, and diagnostic criteria. J Neurotrauma 2014, 31(17):1515-20. 10.1089/neu.2013.3301View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calvi MR, Beretta L, Dell'Acqua A, Anzalone N, Licini G, Gemma M: Early prognosis after severe traumatic brain injury with minor or absent computed tomography scan lesions. J Trauma 2011, 70(2):447-51. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182095e14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chelly H, Chaari A, Daoud E, Dammak H, Medhioub F, Mnif J, Hamida CB, Bahloul M, Bouaziz M: Diffusse Axonal Injury in patients with Head injuries: An Epidemiologic and prognosis Study of 124 cases. J Trauma 2011, 71(4):838-46. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182127baaView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hörtnagl H, Hammerle AF, Hackl JM, Brücke T, Rumpl E, Hörtnagl H: The activity of the sympathetic nervous system following severe brain injury. Intensive Care Med 1980, 6(3):169-77. 10.1007/BF01757299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lv LQ, Hou LJ, Yu MK, Qi XQ, Chen HR, Chen JX, Hu GH, Luo C, Lu YC: Risk factors related to dysautonomia after severe traumatic brain injury. The Journal of trauma, injury, infections and critical care. J Trauma 2011, 71(3):538-42.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.