# S-wave attenuation in northeastern Sonora, Mexico, near the faults that ruptured during the earthquake of 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5

- Gina P Villalobos-Escobar
^{1}Email author and - Raúl R Castro
^{1}Email author

**3**:747

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-747

© Villalobos-Escobar and Castro; licensee Springer. 2014

**Received: **12 September 2014

**Accepted: **11 December 2014

**Published: **17 December 2014

## Abstract

We used a new data set of relocated earthquakes recorded by the Seismic Network of Northeastern Sonora, Mexico (RESNES) to characterize the attenuation of *S*-waves in the fault zone of the 1887 Sonora earthquake (*M*_{
w
} 7.5). We determined spectral attenuation functions for hypocentral distances (*r*) between 10 and 140 km using a nonparametric approach and found that in this fault zone the spectral amplitudes decay slower with distance at low frequencies (*f* < 4 Hz) compared to those reported in previous studies in the region using more distant recordings. The attenuation functions obtained for 23 frequencies (0.4 ≤ *f* ≤ 63.1 Hz) permit us estimating the average quality factor *Q*_{
S
} = (141 ± 1.1 )*f*^{(0.74 ± 0.04)} and a geometrical spreading term *G*(*r*) = 1/*r*^{0.21}. The values of *Q* estimated for *S*-wave paths traveling along the fault system that rupture during the 1887 event, in the north–south direction, are considerably lower than the average *Q* estimated using source-station paths from multiple stations and directions. These results indicate that near the fault zone *S* waves attenuate considerably more than at regional scale, particularly at low frequencies. This may be the result of strong scattering near the faults due to the fractured upper crust and higher intrinsic attenuation due to stress concentration near the faults.

### Keywords

Seismic attenuation Geometrical spreading Sonora Mexico## Introduction

On May 3, 1887, a mayor seismic event (*M*_{
w
} = 7.5) took place on northeastern Sonora (Mexico), destroying the town on Bavispe and its surroundings (Aguilera, 1888). This event, as well as most northern Mexico, is located south of the Basin and Range province (Suter and Contreras, 2002), and generated the longest recorded normal fault surface rupture (101.8 km) in historic time (Suter, 2006).

The Red Sísmica del Noreste de Sonora (RESNES) was installed in 2002 to monitor the seismicity related with the Basin and Range normal faults of northeastern Sonora (Castro *et al.*, 2002; Romero *et al*., 2004). The seismic instruments of the RESNES array consist of Kinemetrics digital recorders (model K2) with internal Episensors that record the three components of ground acceleration, sampled at 200 samples per second, and an external short-period seismometer (model L4C) to record the vertical ground velocity. All stations are autonomous and have a GPS built-in timing system (Castro *et al.*, 2010).

Since the occurrence of the major event in 1887, several studies have been made, including contemporary field studies (Goodfellow, 1888; Aguilera, 1888), studies of intensity and attenuation (DuBois and Smith, 1980; Sbar and DuBois, 1984; Bakun, 2006; Castro *et al*., 2008; Castro *et al*., 2009), regional seismotectonics (Suter and Contreras, 2002), geomorphology (Bull and Pearthree, 1988; Pearthree *et al*., 1990) and microseimicity (Natali and Sbar 1982). Condori (2006) and Castro *et al*. (2008) studied the spectral amplitude decay of body waves with hypocentral distance and proposed local and regional attenuation curves to characterize the attenuation near the fault zone and at distances beyond 100 km from the center of the network.

An important element to evaluate seismic hazard is the attenuation, particularly to estimate the intensity of ground-motion at different epicentral distances. Thus, the quality factor *Q* and the geometrical spreading are key parameters for ground-motion predictions and for seismic hazard analysis. We use in this article a new and more complete data set to study in more detail the seismic attenuation near the fault zone. This new data set is composed by earthquakes relocated by Castro *et al*. (2010) near the faults that rupture during the 1887 event. We also compare results from previous studies of spectral attenuation in the Sonora region with our new results and with results from other studies within the Basin and Range province.

## Data

*et al*. (2010), have local magnitudes between 0.5 and 3.5, hypocentral distances between 10 and 140 km and focal depths of less than 40 km. Table 1 lists the source coordinates and magnitudes of the events used and Table 2 the station coordinates. Figure 2a and b show the distribution of the magnitudes with epicentral distance and the histogram of the number of records per station, respectively. Most events have magnitudes between 1 and 2 (Figure 2) and were recorded by stations NAC and OAX, located in the center of the array.

**List of earthquakes used in the attenuation analysis**

Event | Date | Time | Lat(°) | Lon(°) | H (km) | Ml |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| 19/05/2003 | 8:51:28 | 30.545 | -109.2255 | 20.96 | 1.4 |

| 25/07/2003 | 7:53:12 | 31.1044 | -109.3282 | 12.18 | 1.7 |

| 28/07/2003 | 02:39:41 | 30.7819 | -109.2343 | 9.02 | 2.1 |

| 11/08/2003 | 06:59:45 | 30.7703 | -109.2671 | 4.66 | 1.7 |

| 20/12/2003 | 11:34:54 | 30.9541 | -109.1493 | 6.99 | 1.1 |

| 05/02/2004 | 14:11:05 | 31.4168 | -109.3065 | 0.00 | 1.4 |

| 06/02/2004 | 10:01:07 | 29.9788 | -109.308 | 9.46 | 3.1 |

| 11/03/2004 | 05:54:11 | 30.5666 | -109.286 | 0.34 | 1.4 |

| 06/06/2004 | 10:47:06 | 30.8919 | -109.2318 | 7.09 | 3.5 |

| 25/06/2004 | 12:24:02 | 30.6681 | -109.2775 | 2.56 | 2.7 |

| 04/10/2004 | 09:33:25 | 30.3829 | -109.2218 | 4.15 | 2.7 |

| 04/10/2004 | 09:40:12 | 30.4305 | -109.2598 | 0.00 | 1.8 |

| 04/10/2004 | 09:43:18 | 30.369 | -109.2296 | 0.00 | 1.8 |

| 04/10/2004 | 09:51:00 | 30.3835 | -109.2191 | 0.00 | 1.6 |

| 04/10/2004 | 10:06:25 | 30.3848 | -109.2294 | 0.00 | 2.1 |

| 04/10/2004 | 10:23:53 | 30.3864 | -109.2241 | 0.00 | 1.9 |

| 04/10/2004 | 11:31:53 | 30.3781 | -109.2461 | 21.63 | 1.9 |

| 04/10/2004 | 11:35:17 | 30.3798 | -109.2241 | 0.00 | 1.8 |

| 04/10/2004 | 17:08:56 | 30.3836 | -109.2145 | 4.75 | 1.7 |

| 26/10/2004 | 17:30:17 | 30.3072 | -109.5717 | 7.80 | 1.2 |

| 28/10/2004 | 02:23:05 | 30.2779 | -108.6694 | 3.73 | 2.5 |

| 28/10/2004 | 02:29:18 | 30.2948 | -108.6765 | 2.16 | 1.8 |

| 05/11/2004 | 22:13:13 | 30.0185 | -109.1854 | 2.51 | 2.1 |

| 14/11/2004 | 00:47:09 | 29.975 | -109.3597 | 1.81 | 0.7 |

| 01/12/2004 | 09:52:48 | 29.6885 | -109.2416 | 2.01 | 0.7 |

| 03/12/2004 | 05:32:21 | 30.2886 | -108.6797 | 6.63 | 1.8 |

| 03/12/2004 | 09:10:01 | 30.2798 | -108.6987 | 2.82 | 1.9 |

| 06/12/2004 | 16:14:39 | 29.8437 | -109.3243 | 6.50 | 1.8 |

| 02/01/2005 | 11:37:33 | 30.2395 | -108.7495 | 6.07 | 1.8 |

| 08/01/2005 | 01:22:14 | 30.2639 | -109.1491 | 28.92 | 1.4 |

| 10/01/2005 | 12:43:19 | 31.0746 | -109.2501 | 4.33 | 1.8 |

| 10/02/2005 | 15:34:11 | 30.3095 | -109.5942 | 6.96 | 1.7 |

| 24/03/2005 | 16:49:34 | 30.7731 | -109.3092 | 2.74 | 2.5 |

| 05/07/2005 | 05:27:26 | 29.956 | -109.3033 | 5.82 | 0.9 |

| 27/09/2005 | 12:30:25 | 30.2288 | -109.1722 | 3.01 | 1.4 |

| 28/10/2005 | 14:27:04 | 29.9487 | -109.1408 | 3.01 | 0.5 |

| 30/10/2005 | 11:03:59 | 29.956 | -109.1404 | 3.99 | 0.6 |

| 16/11/2005 | 04:17:40 | 30.2769 | -109.1589 | 2.77 | 1.7 |

| 02/01/2006 | 02:20:03 | 30.6242 | -109.2976 | 0.00 | 1.3 |

| 05/01/2006 | 22:21:31 | 30.2643 | -109.092 | 14.84 | 1.1 |

| 06/01/2006 | 18:56:00 | 30.9326 | -109.1992 | 16.05 | 1.5 |

| 16/01/2006 | 07:20:44 | 30.2914 | -108.977 | 22.84 | 1.0 |

| 28/03/2006 | 09:19:41 | 30.7165 | -109.3152 | 0.00 | 1.6 |

| 16/05/2006 | 23:47:05 | 30.5705 | -109.2579 | 3.85 | 1.6 |

| 17/05/2006 | 05:34:21 | 30.1241 | -109.1125 | 2.02 | 1.7 |

| 29/06/2006 | 09:46:47 | 30.6819 | -109.3154 | 0.68 | 1.1 |

| 05/08/2006 | 12:33:26 | 30.6181 | -109.2829 | 2.00 | 1.8 |

| 13/10/2006 | 04:23:38 | 31.0228 | -109.2666 | 5.86 | 1.4 |

| 19/10/2006 | 18:00.2 | 30.3781 | -109.2839 | 17.22 | 0.9 |

| 21/02/2007 | 13:45:28 | 30.7968 | -109.3635 | 17.33 | 1.4 |

**Station coordinates**

Station | Lat(°N) | Long(°W) | Elevation (m) |
---|---|---|---|

| 30°04.93 | 109°03.30 | 1546 |

| 29°48.67 | 109°09.78 | 70 |

| 30°06.27 | 109°40.02 | 1139 |

| 29°39.71 | 109°26.78 | 745 |

| 31°13.65 | 109°22.25 | 121 |

| 30°14.06 | 108°57.52 | 945 |

| 30°44.19 | 109°39.92 | 62 |

| 30°51.07 | 109°09.76 | 99 |

| 30°20.74 | 109°38.60 | 126 |

| 30°44.19 | 109°03.63 | 90 |

| 31°18.90 | 109°00.90 | 145 |

| 30°33.19 | 108°58.19 | 94 |

*S*-wave arrival and containing 80% of the

*S*-wave energy to calculate the Fourier acceleration spectra of the north–south (NS) and east–west (EW) components. We verify visually that the windows contain the strong-ground motions including the peak acceleration. The first and last 5% of the window are cosine tapered and the spectral amplitudes smoothed averaging within a variable frequency band of ±25% of 23 predefined central frequencies between 0.4 and 63.1 Hz. The spectral amplitudes were smoothed using a variable frequency band of +/- 25% over the 23 predefined central frequencies. For each spectral record, we selected the signal frequency band above noise level by visual inspection of the spectrum. Figure 3 shows examples of signal and noise spectra from stations ELO and MOR located on bedrock and conglomerates, respectively. This figure compares noise and signal spectral levels recorded at both horizontal components from events recorded at epicentral distances less than 20 km (left frames) and at 138.9 km (right frames). The signal spectra (solid lines) correspond to the 80% of the energy of the

*S*-waves and the noise spectra (dashed lines) to 6-seconds time windows starting before the first

*P*-wave arrivals. Examples of the acceleration spectra calculated for two events with magnitudes

*M*

_{ L }3.5 and 1.9 are also shown in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. The signal to noise ratio for these stations is above one in the frequency band 1.0 – 63.1 Hz for local events but increases for events with lager magnitude (M > 1.7). For regional events the signal to noise ratio of stations ELO and MOR is above one in the band 1.0 – 40 Hz.

## Method

### Attenuation functions using a nonparametric method

*et al*., 1990; Anderson and Lei, 1994; Castro

*et al*., 1996; Castro

*et al.*, 2008). This technique was first proposed by Brillinger and Preisler (1984) for the analysis of attenuation relations of peak accelerations. The spectral amplitudes can be modeled with the following equation:

Where *U*_{
i
}(*f*, *r*) is a datum from event *i* recorded at hypocentral distance *r* at a frequency *f, S*_{
i
}(*f*) is a scalar that depends on the size of the *i* th event at a frequency *f. A*(*f*, *r*) is the empirically determined attenuation function that describes the distance decay trend. We assume that *A*(*f*, *r*) implicity contains the effect of both the geometrical spreading and the quality factor *Q*, but we do not limit their behavior to a predetermined parametrical function, instead, we constrain *A*(*f*, *r*) to decay smoothly with distance. The basis of the smooth decaying restriction lies on the principle that the inelastic properties in the crust tend to decrease the amplitudes gradually with distance and that undulations may be related to other factors such as site and wave propagation effects that would reflect on the residuals when solving equation (1) (Castro *et al*., 1990; Castro *et al*., 2008).

The main assumptions of the model described by equation (1) are that *A*(*f*, 0) = 1.0, because at *r* = 0 there is not attenuation and the spectral amplitudes are fully governed by the source term *S*_{
i
}(*f*). The model assumes that the shape of the attenuation function is the same for all the sources, for a given frequency, regardless of the size of the event (Castro *et al*., 1990; Castro *et al*., 2008). Thus, the source factor *S*_{
i
}(*f*) shifts upwards or downwards the attenuation function depending on the magnitude of the event without modifying its shape. One major advantage of this last assumption is that the observed amplitudes of events recorded at different distances at a given frequency complement each other and permits to define the attenuation function at a wider distance range.

*u*

_{ ij }=

*logU*

_{ i }(

*f*,

*r*) is a datum from earthquake

*i*at distance

*j*,

*s*

_{ i }=

*logS*

_{ i }(

*f*), and

*a*

_{ j }=

*logA*(

*f*,

*r*) is the value of the attenuation function at distance

*j*. We discretized the distance range of the observations using a constant interval. Equation (2) represents a system of equations that is solved by a constrained least-squares inversion. Equation (2) can be expressed on matrix form as:

Where *w*_{1} and *w*_{2} are weighting factors provided as input to constrain *a*_{1} *= 0* at *r = 0*, and to weight the second derivate, for smoothing purposes, respectively. The weighting factor *w*_{1} forces the attenuation function to cross the origin. We tested diverse values of the weighting factors and discretized the hypocentral distances at different intervals in order to achieve the expected monotonic and smooth decay of the attenuation function without losing the characteristic trend of the data.

*a*

_{ j }define the shape of

*A(f,r)*for each frequency considered

*.*A more detailed description of this method can be found in Castro

*et al.*, (1990 and 1996). Figure 6 shows examples of attenuation functions found for 10 of the 23 frequencies (0.40-63.1 Hz) analyzed and the respective spectral amplitude data used to calculate them. The amplitudes in Figure 6 were scaled according with the value of

*s*

_{ i }obtained from the inversion. Figure 7 shows spectral amplitudes from event 9 (

*M*

_{ L }3.5) and the corresponding attenuation function (dashed line) scaled with the value of

*s*

_{ 9 }obtained. This figure illustrates how good the attenuation function obtained for event 9 fits the observed spectral amplitudes.

### The quality factor Q using a homogeneous attenuation model

*A(f,r)*can be used to analyze various sources of

*S*-wave attenuation and to estimate the quality factor

*Q*. With this purpose, we model these empirically determined functions as the product of two different attenuation mechanisms (Castro

*et al*., 1999):

Where *1/r*^{
b
} represents the effect of geometric spreading, *N* is a normalization distance and the exponential function accounts for the amplitude decrease due to total *Q* (intrinsic plus scattering). The normalization distance *N* is a reference distance that is chosen as close to the source as the data permits. Note that (*r* – *N*) in equation (4) is the *S*-wave path distance length where *Q* takes effect to normalize the spectral amplitudes at the reference distance. The parameter υ is the average *S*-wave velocity (3.4 km/sec), based on the crustal structure reported by Harder and Keller (2000) for this region. This model has a crustal thickness of 35 km and consists of three layers: the uppermost layer is one km thick and has a *S*-wave velocity of 2.86 km/s; the second layer has a thickness of 21 km and a velocity of 3.3 km/s; and the third layer, that represents the lower crust, has a thickness of 13 km and a velocity of 3.88 km/s. Different values of *N*, between 1 and 20 km, were tested to evaluate the influence of this parameter in the geometric spreading behavior.

*b*and

*Q*can be estimated for each frequency by linearizing equation (4), taking logarithms at both sides. Thus, for a given frequency

*f*we can rewrite equation (4) as a set of linear equations of the form:

Where *d*_{
i
} *=* log *A(f,r*_{
i
}*) –* log*N* is the normalized amplitude at distance *r*_{
i
}, *m*_{
i
} *= -πf(r*_{
i
}*-N)loge/υ, υ =* 3.4 km/s is the average *S*-wave velocity and *c*_{
i
} *= -log(r*_{
i
}*). 1/Q* and *b* are estimated by solving equation (5) with a least-squares inversion scheme.

## Results and discussion

### Attenuation functions

The spectral amplitudes modeled with equation (1) describe the *S*-wave attenuation in northeastern Sonora, in the region close to the rupture zone of the 1887 (*M*_{
W
} = 7.5) earthquake. We determined 23 spectral attenuation functions that represent the decay of the *S*-wave energy for discrete frequencies defined between 0.4 and 63.1 Hz. Figure 6 shows a sample of these attenuation functions and the observed spectral amplitudes for both horizontal (black circles) and vertical (open circles) components. We observe that spectral amplitudes at low frequencies (up to 5.0 Hz) tend to attenuate less with hypocentral distance than amplitudes at higher frequencies. Figure 7 compares the observed spectral amplitudes (circles) from a *M*_{
L
} = 3.5 earthquake (event 9 in Table 1) with the nonparametric attenuation functions (dashed lines) scaled with the corresponding values of *S*_{
i
}*(f)* (equation (1)) resulting from solving equation (2). We also plotted in Figure 7*A(f, r)* for *S*_{
i
}*(f) = 1*(solid lines) as a reference to show that for a given frequency the shape of the attenuation function is the same regardless of the event size. In other words, the rate of decay of the spectral amplitudes with distance is assumed to be the same for all the events.

To evaluate the effect of site conditions of the recoding stations, we calculated spectral attenuation functions separately for both vertical and horizontal ground-motion components using the whole distance range (Figure 6). Under the assumption that the vertical component of acceleration is less susceptible to site-amplification effects, a comparison of the attenuation functions obtained using the vertical component provides a reference to evaluate the effect of local site response on the attenuation functions determined with the horizontal components. We found no substantial differences between the observed spectral data or between the calculated attenuation functions (Figure 6).

### Estimates of Q

*N*,

*b*and

*Q*(equation 4)

_{ . }

*N*is a reference distance chosen as the closest source-station distance,

*b*define the rate of decay due to geometrical spreading, and

*Q*accounts for the attenuation due to anelasticity, friction losses, multipathing and scattering effects. Figure 8 shows estimates of

*b*and

*Q*, calculated for

*N =*1, obtained using the attenuation functions for the hypocentral distance range between 10 and 140 km, and the horizontal acceleration spectra. The values of

*Q*(Figure 8), obtained making

*N*= 1, increase with frequency from 27 at 0.4 Hz to 3547 at 63.1 Hz, while the values of

*b*show a weak dependence with frequency. We also calculated

*Q*using values of

*N*of 10 and 20 finding negative values of

*Q*for most frequencies. Thus, we consider that

*N*= 1 is an adequate reference distance, since provides positive values of

*Q*and a good fit to the observed spectral amplitude decay.

*G*(

*r*) =

*r*

^{- 1}, some studies (Ou and Herrmann 1990; Burger

*et al*., 1987; Chapman and Godbee, 2012 Morozov, 2010) indicate that the apparent geometrical spreading in velocity structures other than a homogeneous whole space will generally involve more complex amplitude decay than

*1/r*. The free parameter

*b*in equation (4) can take different values at different frequencies and accounts for a geometrical spreading that may depart from the value expected for a homogeneous medium. If we adopt a constant geometric spreading model with

*b = 0.21*, that corresponds to the average value of

*b*in the frequency band of 0.5 – 63.1 Hz, and recalculate

*Q*(Figure 9 and Table 3), the frequency dependence of

*Q*can be approximated with the relation

**Values of** Q **(Figure**9**) estimated at different frequencies using** N **= 1 and** b **= 0.21 in equation (** 4**) with the RMS values reported by the inversion process**

Frecuency (Hz) | Q | RMS values |
---|---|---|

0.50 | 121.3 | 0.358 |

1.00 | 132.6 | 0.385 |

1.26 | 229.0 | 0.413 |

1.58 | 212.6 | 0.399 |

2.00 | 206.5 | 0.438 |

2.51 | 325.3 | 0.430 |

3.16 | 282.8 | 0.418 |

3.98 | 334.3 | 0.433 |

5.01 | 381.7 | 0.426 |

6.31 | 475.6 | 0.401 |

7.94 | 452.3 | 0.376 |

10.0 | 504.5 | 0.381 |

12.59 | 695.7 | 0.377 |

15.85 | 1054.0 | 0.367 |

19.95 | 1672.0 | 0.373 |

25.12 | 2747.0 | 0.403 |

31.62 | 2201.0 | 0.412 |

39.81 | 1819.0 | 0.381 |

50.12 | 2955.0 | 0.364 |

63.10 | 3498.0 | 0.359 |

*et al.*(2008) calculated attenuation functions of body waves for a wider region using a smaller data set and found that

Although the model they used to describe the sources of attenuation involve a term that accounts for the near-surface attenuation, their *Q*-frequency relation (equation (7)) follows the general trend of *Q* obtained in this study (circles in Figure 9). However, between 0.63 Hz and 4.0 Hz equation (7) underestimates the values of *Q* here determined (Figure 9). The data sets used in previous studies (Castro *et al*., 2008, 2009) and that used in this paper have important differences. First, we used a greater number of events located in the epicentral area of the 3 May 1887 *M*_{
W
} 7.5 earthquake; second, we used hypocenters relocated by Castro *et al*. (2010) and the precise locations guarantee a better control on the source-station distances; third, the volume sampled by the source-station paths in this paper follows the strike of the faults closer than previous studies.

*Q*-frequency relation similar to equation (6) with a geometric spreading coefficient

*b*defined by sections depending on the hypocentral distance (

*b*= 1.2 for 0 < r ≤ 50 km;

*b =*0.55 for 50 ≤ r ≤ 60 km;

*b =*0.2 for 60 ≤ r ≤ 90 km;

*b =*0.1 for 90 ≤ r ≤ 140 km and

*b =*0.5 for 140 < r ≤ 500 km) in the Basin and Range Province in Utah (USA). This function overestimates slightly the values of

*Q*that we estimated between 3 and 16 Hz (Figure 9), but in general their relation:

follows a similar trend of our *Q* estimates. The parameter *b* depends on the hypocentral distance, and for distances greater than 50 km has values below the theoretical value of one.

### Attenuation in the north–south direction

To evaluate the attenuation of *S* waves in the north–south direction, along the strike of the faults that ruptured during the 1887, we calculated attenuation functions using data from the same site to avoid the possible influence of site amplification effects. We selected station OAX (Figure 1) for having the largest amount of records and for being located inside the fault zone. We formed a dataset with horizontal spectral records of OAX from 33 events with magnitudes between 1.0 and 3.5 that occurred in the 20–90 km distance range from the station. We determined attenuation functions for the same frequencies and procedure (equation 1) as before, and then we used them to estimate *b* and *Q* with equation (4).

*b*and

*Q*obtained with the attenuation functions determined for station OAX, using values of

*N =*20 (the closest source-station distance in the data set). We found that

*Q*increases with frequency following the function

while *b* is weakly dependent of frequency, having a value close to 1.4 for the whole frequency band analyzed (1.3–63.1 Hz).

Some studies of body wave attenuation shows that the coefficient *b* associated with the geometrical spreading is more complex than *b* = 1 and they attribute this to complex velocity structures (Ibáñez *et al.,*1993; Olafsson *et al*., 1998; Castro *et al*., 1999; Akıncı *et al*., 2006; Padhy, 2009). Ou and Herrmann (1990) found that *G(r)* may depend upon source depth in layered structures, while Burger *et al.,* (1987) remarked the importance of post-critical reflections from mid-lower crustal velocity discontinuities and the Moho in controlling amplitudes in certain distance ranges. Chapman and Godbee (2012) found values of the geometrical spreading in eastern North-America up to *r*^{
-4
} for the vertical components and up to *r*^{
-1.5
} for the horizontal components, which exceeds notably the theoretical standards for body waves. In our case, we are finding similar values of the parameter *b* (for *N* = 20), for the OAX data set, to those reported by Chapman and Godbee (2012) for the horizontal components (Figure 10). Malagnini *et al.,* (2002) introduced a slightly frequency-dependent geometrical spreading to model ground motion in northeastern Italy, a region where the attenuation parameters vary considerably. Akıncı *et al.* (2006) proposed geometric spreading functions that are frequency dependent on a stepped way for frequencies below and above 1.0 Hz and for a different range of distances in the Marmara (Turkey) region. The results obtained in this paper (Figures 8 and 10) show that *b* is weakly dependent of frequency and that there are certainly other factors, beyond simple theoretical models, to fully account for all the processes affecting the attenuation of *S*-waves in the Sonora region.

*Q*and

*b*, using

*N*= 20 (Figure 10) for that site. Figure 11 shows also, for comparison, the geometrical spreading function

*G*(

*r*) =

*r*

^{- 1}(dashed lines). The curves calculated with equation (4), with the geometrical spreading model

*G*(

*r*) =

*r*

^{- b}, follow the nonparametric functions very closely at all frequencies, while the function

*G*(

*r*) =

*r*

^{- 1}(dashed lines) underestimate the observed amplitudes at short distances (

*r*< 40 km) and overestimates the observations at larger distances (

*r*> 40 km).

## Summary and conclusions

We used precise hypocenter locations from local events to find nonparametric spectral attenuation functions for the region that ruptured with the *M*_{
w
} *=* 7.5 1887 earthquake of Sonora. The attenuation functions determined decay more slowly with hypocentral distance at low frequencies (*f* < 4 Hz) than results reported previously in the area using more distant recordings. Consequently the *Q*-frequency relation (eq. (7)) obtained by Castro *et al*. (2008) tends to underestimate *Q* between 0.63 and 4.0 Hz. The values of *Q* estimated for the *S*-waves (Figure 9) show a clear dependence of *Q* with the frequency, and agree with the models proposed by Castro *et al*. (2008) for the region, and with the values of *Q* calculated by Jeon and Herrmann (2004) for the Basin and Range Province in the state of Utah (USA).

The values of *Q* estimated with station OAX (eq. (9) and Figure 10) for *S*-wave paths traveling along the strike of the fault system located near the rupture of the 1887 event, in the north–south direction, are considerably lower than the average *Q* estimated using source-station paths from multiple stations and directions (eq. (6) and Figure 9). These results indicate that near the fault zone *S* waves attenuate considerably more than at regional scale, particularly at low frequencies. For instance, at 0.5 Hz *Q* in the north–south direction, along the strike of the faults (eq. (9)), is 10.5 times smaller than the average *Q* (eq. (6)). This may be the result of strong scattering near the faults due to the fractured upper crust and higher intrinsic attenuation due to stress concentration near the faults.

The geometric spreading models found have weak frequency dependence (Figures 8 and 10) and can be approximated as *G*(*r*) = 1/*r*^{0.21} for the average *Q*. This spreading function predicts slower amplitude decay with hypocentral distance than the *r*^{- 1} theoretical model of body waves.

## Notes

## Declarations

### Acknowledgments

We acknowledge CONACYT for providing the scholarship for the first author (GV) and for the research funding through the project CB-2011-165401-F. We thank Luis Inzunza, Arturo Perez-Vertti and Antonio Mendoza for technical support and assistance during the operation of the seismic network. Shri Krishna Singh, José M. Romo and Luis Munguía provided us useful information, encouraging discussions and valuable comments.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Aguilera JG: Estudio de los fenómenos séismicos del 3 de mayo de 1887.
*Anales del Ministerio de Fomento de la República Mexicana*1888, 10: 5-56.Google Scholar - Akıncı A, Malagnini L, Herrmann RB, Gok R, Sorensen MB: Ground motion scaling in the Marmara region, Turkey.
*Geophys Jour International*2006, 166: 635-651. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02971.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Anderson JG, Lei Y: Nonparametric description of peak acceleration as a function of magnitude, distance, and site in Guerrero, Mexico.
*Bull Seismol Soc Am*1994, 84: 1003-1017.Google Scholar - Bakun WH: MMI attenuation and historical earthquakes in the basin and range province of western north America.
*Bull Seismol Soc Am*2006, 96: 2206-2220. 10.1785/0120060045View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Brillinger DR, Preisler HK: An exploratory analysis of the Joyner-Boore attenuation data.
*Bull Seismol Soc Am*1984, 74: 1441-1450.Google Scholar - Bull WB, Pearthree PA: Frequency and size of quaternary surface rupture of the Pitaycachi fault, northeastern Sonora, Mexico.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*1988, 78: 956-978.Google Scholar - Burger RW, Somerville PG, Barker JS, Herrmann RB, Helmberger DV: The effect of crustal structure on strong ground motion attenuation relations in eastern North America.
*Bull Seismol Soc Am*1987, 77: 420-439.Google Scholar - Castro RR, Anderson JG, Singh SK: Site response, attenuation and source spectra of S waves along the Guerrero, México, subduction zone.
*Bull Seimol Soc Am*1990, 80: 1481-1503.Google Scholar - Castro RR, Pacor F, Sala A, Petrungaro C:
*S*wave attenuation and site effects in the region of Friuli, Italy.*J Geophys Res*1996, 101: 22355-22369. 10.1029/96JB02295View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Castro RR, Monachesi G, Mucciarelli M, Trojani L, Pacor F:
*P*and*S*-wave attenuation in the region of Marche, Italy.*Tectonophysics*1999, 302: 123-132. 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00277-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Castro RR, Romero OM, Suter M: Red Sísmica para el monitoreo de la sismicidad del sistema de fallas normales del noreste de Sonora.
*GEOS*2002, 22: 379. (in Spanish)Google Scholar - Castro RR, Condori C, Romero O, Jacques C, Suter M: Seismic attenuation in northeastern Sonora, Mexico.
*Bull Seimol Soc Am*2008, 98: 722-732. 10.1785/0120070062View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Castro RR, Huerta CI, Romero O, Jaques C, Hurtado A, Fernández AI: Body-wave attenuation near the rupture of the 1887 Sonora, México, earthquake (Mw 7.5).
*Geofísica Internacional*2009, 48: 297-304.Google Scholar - Castro RR, Shearer PM, Astiz L, Suter M, Jaques-Ayala C, Vernon F: The long-lasting aftershock series of the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.5 Sonora earthquake in the Mexican basin and range province.
*Bull Seimol Soc Am*2010, 100: 1153-1164. 10.1785/0120090180View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Chapman MC, Godbee RW: Modeling geometrical spreading and the relative amplitudes of vertical and horizontal high-frequency ground motions in eastern North America.
*Bull Seismol Soc Am*2012, 102: 1957-1975. 10.1785/0120110081View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Condori SC:
*Estudio de Atenuación Sísmica de la Región Noreste de Sonora*. MSc. Thesis. CICESE, Ensenada, Baja California, México; 2006.Google Scholar - DuBois SM, Smith AW: The 1887 earthquake in San Bernardino Valley, Sonora: historical accounts and intensity patterns in Arizona.
*Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology Special Paper*1980, 3: 112p.Google Scholar - Goodfellow GE: The Sonora earthquake.
*Science*1888, 11: 162-166.Google Scholar - Harder S, Keller GR: Crustal structure determined from a new wide-angle seismic profile in southwestern New Mexico.
*New Mexico Geologic Society Guidebook, 51st Field Conference, Southwest Passage: A Trip through the Phanerozoic*2000, 75-78.Google Scholar - Ibáñez JM, Del Pezzo E, Alguacil G, De Miguel F, Morales J, De Martino S, Posadas AM: Geometrical spreading function for short-period S and coda waves recorded in southern Spain.
*Phys Earth Planet Inter*1993, 80: 25-36. 10.1016/0031-9201(93)90070-PView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jeon YS, Herrmann RB: High-frequency earthquake ground-motion scaling in Utah and Yellowstone.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*2004, 94: 1644-1657. 10.1785/012003225View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Malagnini L, Akinci A, Herrmann RB, Pino NA, Scognamiglio L: Characteristics of the ground motion in northeastern Italy.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*2002, 92: 2186-2204. 10.1785/0120010219View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Morozov IB:
*Seismological Attenuation Without Q*. Trafford Publishing, Bloomington, Indiana; 2010.Google Scholar - Natali SG, Sbar ML: Seismicity in the epicentral region of the 1887 northeastern Sonora earthquake, Mexico.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*1982, 72: 181-196.Google Scholar - Olafsson S, Sigbjornsson R, Einarsson P: Estimation of source parameters and Q from acceleration recorded in the Vatnafjoll earthquake in south Iceland.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*1998, 88: 556-563.Google Scholar - Ou GB, Herrmann RB: A statistical model for ground motion produced by earthquakes at local and regional distances.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*1990, 80: 1397-1417.Google Scholar - Padhy S: Characteristics of body-wave attenuations in the Bhuj crust.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*2009, 99: 3303-3313.Google Scholar - Pearthree PA, Bull WB, Wallace TC: Geomorphology and quaternary geology of the Pitaycachi fault, northeastern Sonora, Mexico. In
*Geologic excursions through the Sonoran Desert Region, Arizona and Sonora*. Edited by: Gehrels GE, Spencer JE. University of Arizona Press; 1990:124-135.Google Scholar - Romero OM, Jaques C, Castro RR: Análisis de la Sismicidad detectada por la red sismológica del noreste de Sonora.
*Bull Mex Geophys Union*2004, 24: 230. (in Spanish)Google Scholar - Sbar ML, DuBois SM: Attenuation of intensity for the 1887 northern Sonora, Mexico earthquake.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*1984, 74: 2613-2628.Google Scholar - Suter M: Contemporary studies of the 3 May 1887 MW 7.5 Sonora, Mexico (Basin and Range province) earthquake.
*Seism Res Lett*2006, 77: 134-147. 10.1785/gssrl.77.2.134View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Suter M, Contreras J: Active tectonics of northeastern Sonora, Mexico (Southern Basin and Range Province) and the 3 May 1887 Mw 7.4 earthquake.
*Bull Seism Soc Am*2002, 92: 581-589. 10.1785/0120000220View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.