A class of Fourier integrals based on the electric potential of an elongated dipole
© Skianis; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 15 October 2014
Accepted: 1 December 2014
Published: 12 December 2014
In the present paper the closed expressions of a class of non tabulated Fourier integrals are derived. These integrals are associated with a group of functions at space domain, which represent the electric potential of a distribution of elongated dipoles which are perpendicular to a flat surface. It is shown that the Fourier integrals are produced by the Fourier transform of the Green’s function of the potential of the dipole distribution, times a definite integral in which the distribution of the polarization is involved. Therefore the form of this distribution controls the expression of the Fourier integral. Introducing various dipole distributions, the respective Fourier integrals are derived. These integrals may be useful in the quantitative interpretation of electric potential anomalies produced by elongated dipole distributions, at spatial frequency domain.
KeywordsFourier integral Electric dipole Electric potential Polarization Spatial frequency Green’s function
u is the spatial frequency.
For various expressions of m(t) a closed form of the integral V(x) can not be easily found. On the other hand, it is possible to derive the Fourier transform U(u) in a closed form, for certain types of the function m(t). In geophysics, the quantitative interpretation of potential anomalies in spatial frequency domain is quite usual and may give reliable results (Odegard and Berg 1965, Rao et al. 1982, Skianis et al. 2006, Skianis 2012). Therefore the derivation of expressions of U(u) may have applications in geosciences and, possibly, in other fields of physics and engineering, as concerns the behaviour of the electrical field produced by a dipole distribution.
The subject of the present paper is the derivation of non tabulated expressions of the Fourier integral of V(x) of equation (2), for various forms of m(t). An appropriate change of the order of integration must be done before proceeding to the derivation of the integral transform. Consequently, various integrals can be obtained, in closed form, for different expressions of m(t).
2. A general form for the Fourier integral U(u)
In the following mathematical analysis, it is assumed that u > 0. For u = 0, U(0) = 0, since the function V(x) is antisymmetric, as it can be seen from equations (2), (3) and from Figure 1. On the other hand, for u < 0 the Fourier integral U(u) is the complex conjugate of U(|u|). Therefore, knowledge of U(u) for u ≥ 0 is sufficient to describe the behaviour of the Fourier integral at negative u values.
Therefore, the Fourier transform of V(x) may be expressed as the product of the function -iπ exp(-hu) times the integral of m(t)exp(-ut) for dt. Equation (6) may be used in deriving the Fourier integral U(u) for various forms of m(t).
3. The Fourier integral U(u) for a constant m(t)
3. The Fourier integral for m(t) proportional to t
4. The Fourier integral for m(t) varying exponentially with t
In the previous paragraphs, m(t) had such a form that a closed expression for V(x) could be found, according to the equation (2). Furthermore, the Fourier transform pairs of equations (12), (17) and (20), could be derived straight from equation (3), by integrating for x and taking into account tabulated Fourier integrals which may be found in Spiegel (1976) and Abramowitz and Stegun (1968). There are cases, however, that m(t) has such a form that the closed expression for V(x) can not be found by tabulated integrals, therefore a closed expression for U(u) can not be derived by equation (3). This happens, for example, when an exponential function exp(at), with a real is involved in the expression for m(t). In such a case, equation (6) may be the only way to find U(u) in a closed form.
An alternative approach would be to expand exp(at) to a series of (at) n /n!, express equation (2) as a sum of definite integrals ((at) n /n!)dt/(x2 + (t + h)2), find the Fourier integral of each separate term according to equation (3) and try to find a closed expression for the sum of infinite terms. The whole procedure seems quite tedious and it is not sure if a closed expression for U(u) may be derived. Therefore, it is more convenient to proceed according to equation (6).
4. Some Fourier integrals for an infinitely big T
The case of an infinitely big T represents a fault with a very big vertical dimension. The function V(x), according to the equation (2), may be defined if polarization m is zero for t equal to zero. Three forms of the function m(t) are considered.
with b > 0.
The function m(t) = 1-exp(-bt) is equal to zero for t = 0 and increases with t tending to unity.
The third case is that of m(t) = t n , for 0 < n < 2.
Γ is the Gamma function.
It is important to mention that the generalized integrals on the right side of equations (28), (32) and (36) are the Laplace transforms of the respective polarization functions m(t).
A class of non tabulated Fourier transform pairs have been derived, based on the Green’s function of the potential of a distribution of elongated electric dipoles. The Fourier integrals may be expressed as the product of the Fourier transform of the Green’s function exp(-hu) times an integral which depends on the polarization function m(t). For an infinite vertical dimension T, this integral is actually the Laplace transform of m(t).
The Fourier integrals are expressed in rather simple closed forms and they can be used in the direct or iterative quantitative interpretation of surface electric potential measurements at geothermal fields (Corwin and Hoover 1979, Corwin et al. 1981, Thanassoulas and Lazou 1993, Apostolopoulos et al. 1997, Jouniaux and Ishido 2012). Further applications may possibly be developed in modelling of electric fields produced by distributions of elongated electric dipoles.
- Abramowitz M, Stegun IA: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover Publications Inc., New York; 1968.Google Scholar
- Apostolopoulos G, Louis I, Lagios E: The self-potential method in the geothermal exploration of Greece. Geophysics 1997, 62(6):1715-1723. 10.1190/1.1444271View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corwin RF, Hoover DB: The self-potential method in geothermal exploration. Geophysics 1979, 44(2):226-245. 10.1190/1.1440964View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corwin RF, De Moully GT, Harding RS Jr, Morrison HF: Interpretation of self-potential survey results from the East Mesa geothermal field, California. J Geophys Res 1981, 86: 1841-1848. 10.1029/JB086iB03p01841View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fitterman DV: Relationship of the self-potential Green’s function with solutions of controlled-source direct-current potential problems. Geophysics 1979, 44: 1879-1881. 10.1190/1.1440945View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fitterman DV: Thermoelectrical self-potential anomalies and their relationship to the solid angle subtended by the source region. Geophysics 1984, 49: 165-170. 10.1190/1.1441647View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jouniaux L, Ishido T: Electrokinetics in earth sciences: a tutorial. Int J Geophys 2012, 2012: Article ID 286107. doi:10.1155/2012/286107Google Scholar
- Murty BVS, Haricharan P: Nomogram for the complete interpretation of spontaneous potential profiles over sheet-like and cylindrical two-dimensional sources. Geophysics 1985, 50: 1127-1135. 10.1190/1.1441986View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Odegard ME, Berg WJ Jr: Gravity interpretation using the Fourier integral. Geophysics 1965, 30(3):424-438. 10.1190/1.1439598View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rao DA, Ram Babu HV, Sivakumar GDJ: A Fourier transform method for the interpretation of self-potential anomalies due to two-dimensional inclined sheets of finite depth extent. PAGEOPH 1982, 120: 365-374. 10.1007/BF00877042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skianis GA: The self potential anomaly produced by a subsurface flow at the contact of two horizontal layers and its quantitative interpretation. Int J Geophys 2012, 2012: Article number 483590. DOI: 10.1155/2012/483590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Skianis GA, Papadopoulos TD, Vaiopoulos DA: Direct interpretation of self potential anomalies produced by a vertical dipole. J Appl Geophys 2006, 58: 130-143. doi:doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.05.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiegel MR: Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables. . McGraw-Hill, New York; 1976. ESPI, AthensGoogle Scholar
- Thanassoulas C, Lazou A: The Nestos delta geothermal field and its relation to the associated self potential (sp) field. Geothermics 1993, 22(2):117-134. 10.1016/0375-6505(93)90051-NView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.