Skip to main content

Archived Comments for: The second study of experimental human folate deficiency

Back to article

  1. Severe experimental folate deficiency in a human subject

    Paul Golding, None

    19 June 2015

    I am the author of the article (Golding 2014) discussed and criticised in the letter to the editor by Baggott and Tamura.

    The letter was published without peer review. SpringerPlus has rejected my letter in reply on the grounds that “we do not support letter chains”.

    My response to issues raised by Baggott and Tamura has been published on PubMed Commons and may be read here:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674459#comments

    My response on PubMed Commons also contains links to more detailed information. This includes a chart which clearly demonstrates why the criticisms by Baggott and Tamura are erroneous.

    My original article may be read here:

    http://www.springerplus.com/content/3/1/442 or

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25332849

    Thank you.

    Competing interests

    I am the author of the original article discussed in the letter.

Advertisement