Skip to main content
SpringerPlus

Table 7 Collective confounding effects for job effectiveness

From: Are Americans more successful at building intercultural relations than Japanese? A comparison and analysis of acculturation outcomes in Japan

Variables

B

SE B

β

p

sr

sr2

Step 1 (R2 = 0.050 ΔR2 = 0.050)

Nationality

3.20

1.01

.22**

0.002

0.223

0.050

Step 2 (R2 = 0.168 ΔR2 = 0.118)

Nationality

-0.08

1.38

-.01

0.953

-0.004

<0.001a

Cultural outgroup spouse

-0.79

1.51

-.05

0.603

  

Cultural ingroup spouse

-0.73

1.20

-.05

0.543

  

Neighborhood

-3.54

1.32

-.20**

0.008

  

Internat assign

0.12

0.08

.14

0.115

  

Years abroad

0.14

0.08

.19

0.076

  

Assimilation

-1.86

1.42

-.10

0.192

  

Separation

-1.93

1.45

-.11

0.187

  

Marginalization

-3.40

1.27

-.22**

0.008

  
  1. Notes. Neighborhood = lives in a predominantly expatriate or Japanese neighborhood; Internat assign = years worked with cultural outgroup. Having a spouse from another national culture and having a spouse from the same national culture were both referenced to unmarried status. Integration was the reference for Assimilation, Separation, and Marginalization.
  2. a =0.000016.
  3. *p < .05. **p < .01.
Back to article page