Open Access

Microbiota from Litopenaeus vannamei: digestive tract microbial community of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)

  • Jaqueline Tuyub Tzuc1,
  • Diana Rendíz Escalante2,
  • Rafael Rojas Herrera2,
  • Gabriela Gaxiola Cortés1 and
  • Maria Leticia Arena Ortiz1Email author
SpringerPlus20143:280

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-280

Received: 7 January 2014

Accepted: 27 May 2014

Published: 2 June 2014

Abstract

Bacteria capable of producing different extracellular enzymes of potential relevance in digestive processes were isolated from the stomach, hepatopancreas and intestine of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. A total of 64 strains with proteolytic activity were isolated and grouped into 16 clusters based on morphological characteristics: 4 groups were isolated from the intestine; 5 from the hepatopancreas; and 7 from the stomach. Molecular methods (16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing) and phenotypic criteria (Gram stain, catalase and oxidase tests, cell and colony morphology) were used to identify strains, which corresponded to Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio genera. These genera are reported to form part of the digestive tract microbial community in shrimp. Both genera were isolated from all three tested tissues. One member of each morphologic group was selected for analysis of the presence of amylases, lipases/esterases and chitinases. Most of the strains had all the tested enzymes, indicating that the L. vannamei digestive tract microbiotic flora includes groups which have the potential to contribute to the degradation of dietary components.

Keywords

Shrimp Microbiota Digestion Enzymatic activity 16S

Introduction

White shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei is one of the principal crustacean species cultured worldwide. It has been widely studied, although further research is still needed on its physiology and metabolism under specific environmental conditions, as well as its interactions with other organisms.

Gastrointestinal tract microbiota development is a gradual process beginning at birth. In terrestrial animals, maternal microbiota is the initial bacterial colonization source. In aquatic animals, however, this is determined by contact with the surrounding environment, and is influenced by feed intake, hormone secretion, nutrient absorption, and the appearance of proteins and digestive enzymes. Facultative anaerobic strains initially dominate in the intestine after which variation in microbiota population depends on diet, age, geographic location, medical treatment and overall organism condition (Cahill1990; Isolauri et al.2001). Gastrointestinal tract colonization by microbiota in white shrimp occurs during the nauplius 5 stage, when an anal pore begins "anal drinking" movements; this happens before the mouth opens to the exterior environment and normal colonization begins (Simoes et al.2002).

Throughout the life of an organism, its microbiota provide metabolic, trophic and protective functions. Their metabolic functions are aimed at assisting in digestive processes and nutrient absorption to provide energy to the organism. Their trophic functions promote cell growth and differentiation, as well as stimulating of the immune system. Their protective functions are present from birth since they act as the first line of defense against pathogenic, exogenous or opportunist microorganisms, creating a barrier effect (Isolauri et al.2001).

The microbial community of a cultured species can play an important role in aquaculture because it can affect host growth and survival. In marine organisms, gut microbes are associated with digestive enzyme production (Sugita et al.1997; Ramirez and Dixon2003; Izvekova2006; Kar and Ghosh2008), competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria, and generation of essential elements for host metabolism. However, these studies have largely been done with fish species, with little data available on the relevance of gut microbiota in the digestive processes of shrimp. In one such study of krill Meganyctiphaunes norvegica (Donachie et al.1995), both the stomach and hepatopancreas were found to contain saprophytic bacteria related to enzymatic activity. Antiobiotic treatment for 72 hours reduced bacteria concentration and cellulosic, chitinolytic and laminarase activity compared to a control. This diminished bacterial concentration was correlated to the decreases in enzyme activities, suggesting that these bacteria were in a commensalist relationship with the enzymes.

Shrimp species of the family Penaeidae are omnivores, although some do have carnivorous or herbivorous tendencies. They have broad biochemical capacities to use diverse energetic sources as elements in their diet (Rosas and Carrillo2006). Pacific white shrimp L. vannamei prefers protein over carbohydrates as an energy source, meaning it has rather high dietary protein requirements (Tacon1989; García-Galano2006). However, it also use carbohydrates, mainly as a direct source of metabolic energy, as a substratum for chitin synthesis and for nucleic acids synthesis (Gaxiola et al.2006). In addition to functioning as an energy source in L. vannamei, lipids are essential elements in cell structure and function, steroid hormone precursors, intercellular mediators, and are vital to nauplii growth, maturity and production (Rosas and Carrillo2006).

Using culture-independent methods such as DGGE (Avilés-Gómez2011), our research group has studied bacterial flora composition in the digestive tract of shrimp at different stages, when fasting, when given feed with and without antibiotics, in juveniles, adults, males and females. The objective of the present study was to isolate and identify bacteria from the stomach, hepatopancreas and intestine of L. vannamei. Bacteria in these organs are often capable of producing different extracellular enzymes of potential relevance in digestive processes due to their degradation of the principal components in this species’ diet. Understanding the enzymatic capabilities of L. vannamei digestive system bacteria is important for creating a data baseline from which further research can explore their possible application as probiotics. It can also help in optimizing feed formulation to reduce production costs and improve feed digestibility in shrimp culture systems.

Methods

Biological material

Ten individuals of Litopenaeus vannamei were collected from culture ponds at the UMDI-Sisal, and transported live to the laboratory. These had been fed a commercial pellet feed and were grown using a Biofloc type culture system. They were dissected immediately under sterile conditions. The hepatopancreas, stomach and intestine of each were removed, and each organ run through a series of dilutions, beginning at a 1:10 ratio (1 g tissue/9 ml 2% NaCl sterile solution) and continuing progressively to a 1 × 10-5 dilution.

Isolation of bacteria with proteolytic activity

Using the plate extension technique, dilutions were inoculated into casein-enriched marine agar (Difco), with two replicates per dilution. The inoculated dishes were incubated for 24 hours at 27°C ± 1 and strains selected that exhibited a transparent halo, indicating casein hydrolysis. Because similar phenotypes may be different strains, additionally three colonies sharing similar morphologic characteristics were selected per each selected colony. Each colony was inoculated into marine agar (Difco) in Petri dishes and incubated for 24 hours at 27°C ± 1. Using the plate streak method (24 h at 27°C ± 1), re-inoculation of the selected colonies continued until pure strains were obtained. These pure strains were analyzed with catalase and oxidase biochemical tests, and stain characteristics identified by the Gram technique. Each strain was placed in glycerol and stored at -80°C until further analysis.

Molecular identification of isolated strains

The isolated strains were recovered from glycerol storage and their DNA extracted by thermal shock. Bacterial rRNA 16S sequences were amplified using the 16SS (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) (Edwards et al.1989) and 16SR (5′-CGGGAACGTATTCACCG-3′) (Strom et al.2002) primers. Amplification was done following a thermal cycle: 1 cycle at 95°C/1 min; 30 cycles at 95°C/1 min, 45°C/45 s and 72°C/1 min; 1 cycle at 72°C/5 min; and 1 cycle at 4°C/∞. Final PCR reaction volume was 25 μl, which contained 5 μl 5X colorless Gotaq Flexi buffer; 1.5 μl MgCl2; 0.5 μl dNTPs; 1 μl of each primer; 0.2 μl Gotaq Hot Start polymerase; 13.8 μl nuclease-free water; and 2 μl DNA. Product quality was verified by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, and the target amplicon cut out and purified. Amplicons were purified using a commercial kit (Wizard sv gel and PCR clean-up system, Promega) following manufacturer’s instructions. Final products were analyzed in 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, and sequencing done at the Biotechnology Institute (Instituto de Biotecnología - IBT, UNAM). A sequence homology search for the test sequences was done using Nucleotide Blast versus Genebank and RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) data. Results were validated with a phylogenetic analysis using the Winclada program and the Ratchet method (Island Hopper) with a Micrococcus luteus strain as external group.

Other enzymatic activities

To determine if the isolated strains produced other types of extracellular enzymes, one representative group was selected from each morphological group and tested for amylase, chitinase and lipase/esterase activities.

Amylases

Amylase activity was detected using Peptone agar and Von Hofsten and Malmquist Medium B (Atlas2005) enriched with 2% starch and incubated for 24 hours at 27°C ± 1. To determine amylolytic activity, lugol was added to the surface of the medium containing the colonies, and those clearly exhibiting a halo deemed positive.

Chitinases

Strains were inoculated into chitin agar (Atlas2005) enriched with 2% NaCl and incubated at 27°C ± 1, and the strain capacity to grow in this medium observed.

Lipases/esterases

Activity for these enzymes was tested using a medium described by Sánchez-Porro (Sánchez-Porro2005), modified by changing the concentration of the salts to 10% and that of NaCl to 2% . Each strain was inoculated into this medium and incubated at 27°C ± 1 until a zone of precipitation formed around the colonies as a consequence of the reaction between CaCl2 and the fatty acids released by hydrolysis of Tween 80.

Results

Isolation of strains with proteolytic activity

A total of 64 strains with proteolytic activity against casein were isolated from the digestive tract of L. vannamei. These trains clustered into 16 groups based on morphological characteristics: 4 groups from the intestine, 5 from the hepatopancreas and 7 from the stomach.

Identification of isolated strains

Using the 16SS and 16SR primers, a 1300 bp amplicon for the rRNA 16S gen was isolated from the strains. Sequencing and homology queries in databases produced values ≥90% for maximum identity and E values near 0 for the Nucleotide Blast analysis. Sequence similarity and S-ab scores based on the RDP database had values near 1. The identified homologies correspond to strains belonging to species of the genera Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio (Table 1). Results were consistent in both consulted databases. Dendrograms with high consistency and retention indices were produced with a phylogenetic analysis using the identified homologies (Figures 1 and2). The phylogenetic results validated the biodata analysis results. All identified strains were Gram negative and had reacted positively to catalase and oxidase tests. This is consistent with the accepted general descriptions of Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio.
Table 1

Homologies of the isolated strains with 16S ribosomal DNA gene sequences in the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) database

Strain

Homology access no.

Description

Similarity

S-AB score

EB2

AY332401

Vibrio harveyi

0.997

0.988

GU078671

Vibrio communis

0.997

0.992

GU078673

Vibrio communis

0.997

0.992

EC2

EU419923

Vibrio sp.

0.995

0.992

GU223590

Vibrio sp.

0.995

0.992

GU078673

Vibrio communis

0.995

0.987

EC3

AJ316187

Vibrio rotiferianus

0.991

0.957

AY264924

Vibrio harveyi

0.991

0.957

EU419923

Vibrio sp.

0.991

0.963

ED4

GU223600

Vibrio sp.

0.993

0.961

GU223583

Vibrio sp.

0.993

0.961

DQ513192

Vibrio sp.

0.993

0.963

EE1

DQ985032

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.979

0.937

EU090137

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.983

0.937

AY745839

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.979

0.940

EE3

U80834

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.994

0.987

DQ985032

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.994

0.987

EU090137

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

0.994

0.987

EE4

EU090137

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

1.000

0.977

DQ985032

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

1.000

0.977

U80834

Pseudoalteromonas sp.

1.000

0.977

EF1

AF246980

Vibrio sp.

0.994

0.974

AY264924

Vibrio harveyi

0.994

0.974

FM957478

Vibrio sp.

0.994

0.983

EF3

AJ316187

Vibrio rotiferianus

0.997

0.991

FJ457565

Vibrio sp.

0.998

0.991

FM204857

Vibrio rotiferianus

0.998

0.991

EF4

AJ316187

Vibrio rotiferianus

0.993

0.977

AY264924

Vibrio harveyi

0.993

0.977

FJ457565

Vibrio sp.

0.995

0.977

EG4

GU223587

Vibrio sp.

0.997

0.992

GQ406702

Vibrio sp.

0.997

0.992

FM204855

Vibrio campbellii

0.999

0.992

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree based on RNAr 16S gene sequences (Ratchet method, Length: 317, consistency index: 70%, retention index: 95%). We show the phylogenetic relation of the studied strains with other groups. Micrococcus luteus AJ536198 was used as an external group.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree based on RNAr 16S gene sequences (Ratchet method, Length: 307, consistency index: 60%, retention index: 91%). We show the phylogenetic relation of the studied strains with other groups. Micrococcus luteus AJ536198 was used as an external group.

Amylase

Of the isolated Vibrio strains, amylase activity was observed in one strain from the hepatopancreas (HD2), two from the stomach (EF3, EG4) and one from the intestine (IA1). No activity was observed in one strain from the stomach (ED4) and one from the intestine (ID4), and the remaining Vibrio strains exhibited low activity (Table 2). None of the Pseudoalteromonas strains (i.e. EE1, HB1, and IC1) exhibited amylase activity (Table 2).
Table 2

Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio strains isolated from the stomach, hepatopancreas and intestinal tissues of L. vannamei , and their extracellular enzymatic production (A = Amylases, L = Lipases/Esterases, Ch = Chitinases, black dots [] = enzymatic activity detected, (*) = no activity detected)

  

Stomach

 

Hepato

 

Intest

  

A

L

Ch

 

A

L

Ch

 

A

L

Ch

Pseudoalteromonas

EE1

 

HB1

 

IC1

*

EB2

HA1

IA1

EC2

HC2

IB1

*

Vibrio

ED4

*

HD2

ID4

*

EF3

HE2

    

EG4

        

Chitinase

All strains had chitinase activity, except the Vibrio strain (IB1) isolated from the intestine. However, activity was generally low in both genera (Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas), particularly in HB1 (hepatopancreas), EE1 (stomach) and IC1 (intestine) (Table 2).

Lipase/esterase

All tested strains (Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas) exhibited lipase/esterase activity (Table 2). Two strains from the stomach (EE1, EF3), one from the hepatopancreas (HB1) and two from the intestine (IB1, IB4) had low or nearly absent activity while the remaining strains had high activity.

Discussion

Bacterial strains were successfully isolated from the digestive tract of L. vannamei. Many of these were found to have the capacity for extracellular enzyme production, which may be relevant in the digestive processes of this species. Isolated strains belonged to the Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas genera, both of which are normal flora in the shrimp digestive system, although Vibrio species are normally the most abundant (Gomez-Gil et al.1998; Moss et al.2000; Oxley et al.2002; Esiobu and Yamazaki2003; Liu et al.2011). Strains from both genera were isolated from the three sampled tissues. This agrees with previous reports in which the genera Aeromonas, Plesiomonas, Photobacterium, Pseudomonas, Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio were isolated and identified from different parts of the Penaeus merguiensis digestive tract (Oxley et al.2002). Pseudoalteromonas is a common genus in the marine environment with about 30 species present in sea water, algae or marine invertebrates (Ivanova et al.2002; Holmström et al.2002). These species produce several chemical compounds, including amylases (Gavrilovic et al.1982; Aghajari et al.1998), β-galactosidases (Hoyoux et al.2001), phospholipases (Cadman and Eichberg1983), antimicrobial compounds (Holmström et al.2002) and proteases (Holmström and Kjelleberg1999; Venkateswaran and Dohmoto2000). Some Pseudoalteromonas species have been described as pathogens (Ridgway et al.2008; Wang2011), while others have been used as probiotics in marine organisms, including shrimp (Le Moullac et al.2003; Schulze et al.2006; Doeschate and Coyne2008). Similarly, Vibrio species are broadly distributed in marine environments and are associated with a wide variety of organisms. Many are known to be pathogens, some in shrimp (Sung et al.2001; Hsu and Chen2007), while others have been tested as probiotics (e.g. V. alginolyticus, V. fluvialis and V. campbellii) (Verschuere et al.2000; Schulze et al.2006; Balcázar et al.2007).

Proteins, carbohydrates and lipids are among the principal components of the shrimp diet and consequently represent the highest weight percentage in feed formulations (Akiyama et al.1991). Digestion in the shrimp gastrointestinal tract allows uptake of monomers such as amino acids, sugars and fatty acids (Nolasco et al.2006). These monomers, as well as other free monomers already in the diet, represent the principal fraction to be assimilated and metabolized from any formulated or natural feed (Akiyama et al.1991; Shiau1997). Most of the identified strains produced all the tested enzymes (proteases, amylases, lipases/esterases and chitinases), indicating that L. vannamei bacterial flora includes some groups exhibiting multienzymatic activity. This agrees with (Dempsey and Kitting1987), in which isolated bacteria from the digestive tract of Penaeus aztecus expressed for one or more enzyme types (lipases, amylases, chitinases and cellulases).

The multienzymatic capacity observed here suggests that the isolated strains have a high potential for degrading the principal dietary components of L. vannamei. However, this capability is restricted by digestive tract environmental conditions, which may or may not favor enzymatic production. Bacterial stress factors such as pH, oxygen levels and nutrient availability can affect the production of certain enzymes; for example, reports that variations between pH 4.4 and 10.5 affect the metalloprotease production of Pseudoalteromonas atlantica. Nonetheless, both Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio include species capable of surviving and reproducing under digestive tract conditions in different aquatic species, including decapod crustaceans (Hoffman and Decho2000).

Pseudoalteromonas species are adapted to wide ranges of temperature (10-37°C), salinity (1-10% NaCl) and pH (6-10, optimum 6 - 7) (Venkateswaran and Dohmoto2000; Hoffman and Decho2000). Some Vibrio species can grow within an even wider temperature range (4 – 40°C) and in similar salinities (1 to 9% NaCl) (Fujino et al.1974; Hada et al.1984; Thompson et al.2003; Gómez-Gil et al.2003; Gómez-Gil et al.2008). Based on their ability to prosper under these conditions, it is quite possible that the microbiotic enzymatic activities identified here in vitro could also occur in vivo.

Several studies, principally with fish, have shown the active role that exogenic enzymes have in food digestion within the digestive tract. There is still some debate about the magnitude of the contribution of these enzymes to total enzymatic activity. Detection and characterization of protease enzymes in shrimp has involved several approaches, but enzyme purification has only been done in a few studies. In most studies, the presence of enzymes has been detected with raw extracts, using synthetic substrates or specific inhibitors for each of the tested enzymes (Carrillo and González2000; Forrellat and Gaxiola2006). This is also the case in studies addressing enzymes that degrade carbohydrates. As a result, it is still unclear whether enzymatic activity in the shrimp digestive tract is produced completely by the organism or is at least partially due to its bacterial flora.

The Pseudoalteromonas strains identified here (EE1, HB1, IC1) exhibited no amylase activity, although this activity has been identified in other Pseudoalteromonas species (e.g. P. peptidolytica, P. aurantia, P. citrea, P. luteoviolacea and P. rubra) (Gavrilovic et al.1982; Venkateswaran and Dohmoto2000). Amylase activity was observed in most of the Vibrio strains, except for ED4 and ID4. This activity has been reported for several Vibrio species, including V. tubiashii, V. parahaemolyticus and V. sinaloensis (Hada et al.1984; Fujino et al.1974; Gómez-Gil et al.2008), as well as other strains not identified to the species level (León et al.2000). Because the same temperature and pH values were used for all the identified strains, the differences observed in activity intensity may be related to the response of each bacterial strain to the experimental parameters.

Chitinase activity has been identified in the digestive tract of several aquatic species, including some penaeid shrimps (Goodrich and Morita1977; Kono et al.1990; Spindler-Barth et al.1990). Several authors agree that chitinase levels in shrimp are sufficient to allow for significant digestion of dietary chitin (Kono et al.1990). Chitinases are secreted endogenously, but their presence in the shrimp digestive tract has also been attributed to chitinolytic bacteria. This is not surprising since chitin is one of the most abundant biopolymers in nature and is used as a carbon source by several microorganisms (Hood and Meyers1973; Dempsey and Kitting1987; Connell et al.1998). Chitinase enzymes were reported to be produced by bacteria from the digestive tract of Litopenaeus setiferus, and increases in chitinase activity were observed in shrimp fed a chitin-rich diet with a parallel rise in chitinolytic bacteria counts (Hood and Meyers1973). Chitinolytic bacteria have also been reported in the digestive tracts of Penaeus aztecus (Dempsey and Kitting1987). Dependence on bacteria for chitinase activity in which growth rates did not increase in Penaeus monodon juveniles fed chitin-enriched diets at 0%, 4%, 8%, 12% and 16%. Low numbers of chitinolytic microorganisms were found in the organisms’ digestive tracts. It was concluded that chitinase synthesis by the digestive gland rises at a low rate and therefore the organisms could only digest small amounts of dietary chitin in the absence of bacterial chitinase production (Fox1993).

Chitinase production has been detected in Vibrio species such as V. vulnificus, V. harveyi and V. parahaemoliticus (Connell et al.1998). The same could be expected of Pseudoalteromonas species, an exclusively marine genus. However, the Pseudoalteromonas strains identified here had the lowest chitinase activity among the identified strains, and in a study of several species chitinase activity was only identified in P. citrea (Venkateswaran and Dohmoto2000).

Very few studies have reported the presence of lipase in decapods. These include a study in which lipase activity was found in the digestive gland of L. vannamei using Beta-naphthyl nanonate as a substrate (Moss et al.2001), and another in which lipolytic activity was attributed to non-specific esterases (Carrillo and González2000). In the present study, all tested strains from the L. vannamei digestive tract exhibited lipase/esterase activity, indicating that lipase/esterase production is very common in the analyzed genera. This agrees with previous studies reporting lipase/esterase production in Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas species (Emod et al.1983; Hada et al.1984; León et al.2000; Venkateswaran and Dohmoto2000; Gómez-Gil et al.2008). Shrimp have low lipid requirements and consequently low lipase activity, meaning that diets containing high lipid levels (>10%) are not fully exploited by these organisms (Lista and Velásquez2003). The lipid degrading capacity of some bacteria could therefore be used to increase lipid assimilation in cultured shrimp species such as L. vannamei.

Vibrio and Pseudoalteromonas species have been used as probiotics (Verschuere et al.2000; Schulze et al.2006; Balcázar et al.2007). For a bacteria to be considered probiotic it must be capable of surviving passage through the gastrointestinal tract. It must then colonize the host digestive system, either by adhering to the mucous membrane surface or the intestinal epithelia. Finally, it must be able to produce inhibitory or antagonist metabolites against undesirable native flora, and reproduce (Thompson et al.1999; Verschuere et al.2000; Ziaei-Nejad et al.2006). Pseudoalteromonas species are promising in this sense because they have been found in association with marine organisms and have the capacity to produce a wide range of compounds with antimicrobial activity. This allows them to compete with other microorganisms for nutrients and colonizing surfaces, thus reducing pathogen adherence (Holmström and Kjelleberg1999). The present results show that the identified strains produce diverse exo-enzymes. This suggests they may be potential probiotics, with the distinct advantage that they are endemic to the L. vannamei digestive system.

The data reported here on the enzyme producing capabilities of shrimp gut bacteria can form the basis for future research aimed at optimizing shrimp culture practices. Specific studies are needed on the probiotic potential of the identified bacterial species and on developing shrimp feed formulations that provide maximum growth performance considering the organism’s gastrointestinal microbiota. Future developments in these areas could help to reduce production costs and augment feed digestibility.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The research reported here forms part of a project funded by a PAPIIT IN207409 grant. The authors thank Karla Escalante, Manuel Valenzuela and Gema Martinez for technical support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigación (UMDI), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
(2)
Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Campus de Ingenierías y Ciencias Exactas

References

  1. Aghajari N, Feller G, Gerday C, Haser R: Crystal structures of the psychrophilic a-amylase from Alteromonas haloplanctis in its native form and complexed with an inhibitor. Protein Sci 1998, 7: 564-572. 10.1002/pro.5560070304View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyama D, Dominy W, Lawrence A: Penaeid shrimp nutrition for the commercial feed industry. In Proceedings of the aquaculture feed processing and nutrition workshop. Edited by: Akiyama D, Tan R. Singapore: American Soybean Association; 1991:80-98.Google Scholar
  3. Atlas RM: Handbook of Media for Environmental Microbiology. 2nd edition. 2005, 664. CRC pressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Avilés-Gómez L: Estudio de la microbiota del sistema digestivo en el camarón blanco Litopenaeus vannamei . Masters Thesis 2011, 104. ICMyL UNAMGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcázar J, Rojas-Luna T, Cunningham D: Effect of the addition of four potential probiotics strains on the survival of Pacific white shrimp ( Litopenaeus vannamei ) following immersion challenge with Vibrio parahaemolyticus . J Invertebr Pathol 2007, 96: 147-150. 10.1016/j.jip.2007.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadman E, Eichberg J: The presence of phospholipase a and lysophospholipase activities in culture supernatant fluid from Alteromonas espejiana . Int J Biochem 1983, 15: 1155-1159. 10.1016/0020-711X(83)90231-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahill MM: Bacterial flora of fishes: a review. Microb Ecol 1990, 19: 21-41. 10.1007/BF02015051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrillo F, González R: Control de la digestión en camarones. In Avances en Nutrición Acuícola IV. Edited by: Civera R, Pérez CJ, Ricque D, Cruz LE. Baja California Sur, Mexico: Memorias del IV Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola. La Paz; 2000:138-148.Google Scholar
  9. Connell T, Metzger D, Lynch J, Folser J: Endochitinase is transported to the extracellular milieu by the eps-encoded general secretory pathway of Vibrio cholerae . J Bacteriol 1998, 180: 5591-5600.Google Scholar
  10. Dempsey A, Kitting C: Characteristics of bacteria isolated from penaeid shrimp. Crustaceana 1987, 52: 90-94. 10.1163/156854087X00105View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Doeschate K, Coyne V: Improved growth rate in farmed Haliotis midae through probiotic treatment. Aquaculture 2008, 284: 174-179. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Donachie S, Saborowski R, Peters G, Buchholz F: Bacterial digestive enzyme activity in the stomach and hepatopancreas of Meganyctiphanes norveica (M. Sars, 1857). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1995, 188: 151-165. 10.1016/0022-0981(94)00193-HView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blocker H, Emde M, Bottger E: Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes, characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1989, 17: 7843-7853. 10.1093/nar/17.19.7843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Emod I, Soubigou P, Tong N, Keil B, Richard C: Assignment of Achromobacter iophagus strain I.029 to Vibrio alginolyticus chemovar iophagus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983, 33: 451-459. 10.1099/00207713-33-3-451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Esiobu N, Yamazaki K: Analysis of bacteria associated with the gut of healthy wild penaeid shrimps: a step towards effective probiotics in aquaculture. J Aquaculture Tropics 2003, 18: 275-286.Google Scholar
  16. Forrellat A, Gaxiola G: Enzymas digestivas y control de la digestión. In Estado actual y perspectivas de la nutrición de los camarones peneidos cultivados en Iberoamérica. Edited by: Rosas C, Carrillo O, Wilson R, Andreatta ER. DF: México; 2006:27-60.Google Scholar
  17. Fox C: The effect of dietary chitin on the growth, survival and chitinase levels in the digestive gland of juvenile Penaeus monodon . Aquaculture 1993, 109: 39-49. 10.1016/0044-8486(93)90484-GView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujino T, Sakazaki R, Tamura K: Designation of the type strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974, 24: 447-449. 10.1099/00207713-24-4-447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Galano T: Requerimientos nutricionales: proteínas. In Estado actual y perspectivas de la nutrición de los camarones peneidos cultivados en Iberoamérica. Edited by: Rosas C, Carrillo O, Wilson R, Andreatta ER. DF: México; 2006:128-142.Google Scholar
  20. Gavrilovic L, O’Brien R R, Sanders R: Secretion of amylase by the marine bacterium Alteromonas rubra . Aust J Biol Sci 1982, 35: 111-124.Google Scholar
  21. Gaxiola G, Rosas C, Arena L, Cuzón G: Requerimiento de carbohidratos. In Estado actual y perspectivas de la nutrición de los camarones peneidos cultivados en Iberoamérica. Edited by: Rosas C, Carrillo O, Wilson R, Andreatta ER. DF: México; 2006:143-153.Google Scholar
  22. Gomez-Gil B, Tron-Mayén L, Roque A, Turnbull J, Inglis V, Guerra-Flores A: Species of Vibrio isolated from hepatopancreas, haemolymph and digestive tract of a population of healthy juvenile Penaeus vannamei . Aquaculture 1998, 163: 1-9. 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00162-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gómez-Gil B, Thompson F, Thompson C, Swings J: Vibrio rotiferianus sp. nov., isolated from cultures of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003, 53: 239-243. 10.1099/ijs.0.02430-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez-Gil B, Fajer-Avila E, Pascual J, Macián MC, Pujalte MJ, Garay E, Roque A: Vibrio sinaloensis sp. nov., isolated from the spotted rose snapper, Lutjanus guttatus Steindachner, 1869. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008, 58: 1621-1624. 10.1099/ijs.0.65719-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodrich T, Morita R: Bacterial chitinase in the stomachs of marine fishes from Yaquina Bay, Oregon. USA Mar Biol 1977, 41: 355-360. 10.1007/BF00389101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hada H, West P, Lee J, Stemmeler J, Colwell R: Vibrio tubiashii sp. nov., a pathogen of bivalve mollusks. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984, 34: 1-4. 10.1099/00207713-34-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffman M, Decho A: Proteolytic enzymes in the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas atlantica : post-secretional activation and effects of environmental conditions. Aquat Microb Ecol 2000, 23: 29-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmström C, Kjelleberg S: Marine Pseudoalteromonas species are associated with higher organisms and produce biologically active extracellular agents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1999, 30: 285-293. 10.1016/S0168-6496(99)00063-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Holmström C, Egan S, Franks A, McCloy S, Kjelleberg S: Antifouling activities expressed by marine surface associated Pseudoalteromonas species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2002, 41: 47-58. 10.1016/S0168-6496(02)00239-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hood M, Meyers S: Microbial aspects of penaeid shrimp digestion. Proc Annu Gulf Caribb Fish Inst 1973, 26: 81-91.Google Scholar
  31. Hoyoux A, Jennes I, Dubois P, Genicot S, Dubail F, Francois J: Cold-adapted B-galactosidase from the antarctic psychrophile Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis . Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67: 1529-1535. 10.1128/AEM.67.4.1529-1535.2001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsu S, Chen J: The immune response of white shrimp Penaeus vannamei and its susceptibility to Vibrio alginolyticus under sulfide stress. Aquaculture 2007, 271: 61-69. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Isolauri E, Sütas Y, Kankaanpää P, Arvilommi H, Salminen S: Probiotics: effects on immunity. Am J Clin Nutr 2001, 73(suppl):444S-450S.Google Scholar
  34. Ivanova E, Matte G, Matte M, Coenye T, Hug A, Colwell R: Characterization of Pseudoalteromonas citrea and P. nigrifaciens isolated from different ecological habitats based on REP-PCR genomic fingerprints. Syst Appl Microbiol 2002, 25: 275-283. 10.1078/0723-2020-00103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Izvekova G: Hydrolytic activity of enzymes produced by symbiotic microflora and its role in digestion processes of bream and its intestinal parasite Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Cestoda, Caryophyllidea). Biol Bull 2006, 33: 287-292. 10.1134/S1062359006030125View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kar N, Ghosh K: Enzyme producing bacteria in the gastrointestinal tracts of Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and Channa punctatus (Bloch). Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci 2008, 8: 115-120.Google Scholar
  37. Kono M, Matsui T, Shimizu C, Koga D: Purification and some properties of chitinase from the liver of prawn, Penaeus japonicus . Agric Biol Chem 1990, 54: 2145-2147. 10.1271/bbb1961.54.2145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Le Moullac G, Goyard E, Saulnier D, Haffner P, Thouard E, Nedelec G, Goguenheim J, Rouxel C, Cuzon G: Recent improvements in broodstock management and larviculture in marine species in Polynesia and New Caledonia: genetic and health approaches. Aquaculture 2003, 227: 89-106. 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00497-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. León J, Pellón F, Unda V, David J, Anaya C, Mendoza V: Producción de enzimas extracelulares por bacterias aisladas de invertebrados marinos. Rev Peru Biol 2000., 7: http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/bvrevistas/biologia/v07_n2/produc_enzi.htmGoogle Scholar
  40. Lista M, Velásquez C: Influencia de tres dietas experimentales en el crecimiento de postlarvas de Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931). Revista Científica FCV-LUZ 2003, 13: 167-172.Google Scholar
  41. Liu H, Wang L, Liu M, Wang B, Jiang K, Ma S: The intestinal microbial diversity in Chinese shrimp ( Fenneropenaeus chinensis ) as determined by PCR-DGGE and clone library analyses. Aquaculture 2011, 317: 32-36. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Moss S, LeaMaster B, Sweeney J: Relative abundance and species composition of Gram-negative, aerobic bacteria associated with the gut of juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared in oligotrophic well water and eutrophic pond water. J World Aquac Soc 2000, 31: 255-263. 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00361.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Moss S, Divakaran S, Kim B: Stimulating effects of the pond water on digestive enzyme activity on the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone). Aquac Res 2001, 32: 125-131. 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2001.00540.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Nolasco H, Del Monte A, Hinojosa P, Civera-Cerecedo R, Vega-Villasante F: Digestibilidad in vitro de lípidos alimentarios para el camarón. In Avances en Nutrición Acuícola VIII. Edited by: Cruz L, Ricque D, Tapia M, Nieto MG, Villarreal DA, Puello AC, García A. Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico: VIII Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; 2006:377-395.Google Scholar
  45. Oxley A, Shipton W, Owens L, McKay D: Bacterial flora from the gut of the wild and cultured banana prawn, Penaeus merguiensis . J Appl Microbiol 2002, 93: 214-223. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01673.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramirez RF, Dixon B: Enzyme production by obligate intestinal anaerobic bacteria isolated from oscars ( Astronotus ocellatus ), angelfish ( Pterophyllum scalare ) and southern flounder ( Paralichthys lethostigma ). Aquaculture 2003, 227: 417-426. 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00520-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridgway I, Small H, Atkinson R, Birkbeck H, Taylor A, Neil D: Extracellular proteasas and possible disease-related virulence mechanisms of two marine bacteria implicated in an opportunistic bacterial infection of Nephrops norvegicus . J Invertebr Pathol 2008, 99: 14-19. 10.1016/j.jip.2008.05.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosas C, Carrillo O: Principales rutas metabólicas, utilización de la energía. In Estado actual y perspectivas de la nutrición de los camarones peneidos cultivados en Iberoamérica. Edited by: Rosas C, Carrillo O, Wilson R, Andreatta ER. DF: México; 2006:61-88.Google Scholar
  49. Sánchez-Porro C: Caracterización bioquímica y molecular de la haloproteasa CP1 producida por Pseudoalteromonas ruthenica . In Ph.D. Thesis. Seville, Andalucia: Universidad de Seville; 2005.Google Scholar
  50. Schulze A, Alabi A, Tattersall-Sheldrake A, Miller K: Bacterial diversity in a marine hatchery: balance between pathogenic and potentially probiotic bacterial strains. Aquaculture 2006, 256: 50-73. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.02.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Shiau S: Nutrient requirements of penaeid shrimps. Aquaculture 1997, 164: 77-93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Simoes N, Jones D, Soto-Rodríguez S, Roque A, Gómez-Gil B: Las bacterias en el inicio de la alimentación exógena en larvas de camarones peneidos: efectos de la calidad del agua, tasas de ingestión y rutas de colonización del tracto digestivo. In Avances en Nutrición Acuícola VI. Edited by: Cruz-Suarez L, Ricque-Marie D, Tapia-Salazar M, Gaxiola-Cortés M, Simoes N. Cancún, Quintana Roo, Mexico: Memorias del VI Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola; 2002.Google Scholar
  53. Spindler-Barth M, Van Wormhoudt A, Spindler K: Chitinolytic enzymes in the integument and midgut-gland of the shrimp Palaemon serratus during the moulting cycle. Mar Biol 1990, 106: 49-52. 10.1007/BF02114673View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Strom K, Sjogren J, Broberg A, Schnurer J: Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides Cyclo (L-Phe-L-Pro) and Cyclo (L-Phe-trans-4-OH-L-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68: 4322-4327. 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4322-4327.2002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sugita H, Kawasaki J, Deguchi Y: Production of amylase by the intestinal microflora in cultured freshwater fish. Lett Appl Microbiol 1997, 24: 105-108. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00360.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Sung H, Hsu S, Chen C, Ting Y, Chao W: Relationships between disease outbreak in cultured tiger shrimp ( Penaeus monodon ) and the composition of Vibrio communities in pond water and shrimp hepatopancreas during cultivation. Aquaculture 2001, 192: 101-110. 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00458-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Tacon A: Nutrición y alimentación de peces y camarones cultivados, manual de capacitación. Brazil, Brasilia: FAO; 1989.http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/AB492S/AB492S00.htmGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson F, Abreu P, Cavalli R: The use of microorganisms as food source for Penaeus paulensis larvae. Aquaculture 1999, 174: 139-153. 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00511-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson F, Thompson C, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Gullian M, Swings J: Vibrio fortis sp. nov. and Vibrio hepatarius sp. nov., isolated from aquatic animals and the marine environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003, 53: 1495-1501. 10.1099/ijs.0.02658-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Venkateswaran K, Dohmoto N: Pseudoalteromonas peptidolytica sp. nov., a novel marine mussel-thread-degrading bacterium isolated from the sea of Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000, 50: 565-574. 10.1099/00207713-50-2-565View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W: Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2000, 64: 655-671. 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.655-671.2000View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang W: Bacterial diseases of crabs: a review. J Invertebr Pathol 2011, 106: 18-26. 10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Ziaei-Nejad S, Rezaei M, Takami G, Lovett D, Mirvaghefi A, Shakouri M: The effect of Bacillus spp. bacteria used as probiotics on digestive enzyme activity, survival and growth in the Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus . Aquaculture 2006, 252: 516-524. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.07.021View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tzuc et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.