SpringerPlus

Impact Factor 0.982

SpringerPlus Cover Image
Research
Open Access

An efficient protocol for total DNA extraction from the members of order Zingiberales- suitable for diverse PCR based downstream applications

  • Khumallambam Devala Devi1,
  • Kshetrimayum Punyarani1,
  • Nandeibam Samarjit Singh1 and
  • Huidrom Sunitibala Devi1Email author
SpringerPlus20132:669

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-669

©  Devi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

Received: 5 August 2013

Accepted: 2 December 2013

Published: 13 December 2013

Abstract

Different protocols are usually used for extracting total deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from different plant species of same order and DNA of the associated viruses. Here, we describe a rapid, efficient and universal protocol for isolating total DNA from the members of Zingiberales which harbor a high amount of polysaccharides and secondary metabolites. DNA isolated with this protocol was successfully used for PCR based downstream applications viz. random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR), DNA barcoding gene (Internal transcribed spacer and trnl-f) amplification and detection of the viruses.

Keywords

CTAB DNA extraction DNA barcoding gene ISSR RAPD Virus detection Zingiberales

Introduction

Molecular techniques require isolation of genomic DNA of suitable purity. The isolation of good quality DNA is the prerequisite for molecular research. Successful application of PCR based downstream applications requires efficient recovery of good quality and quantity of DNA. To isolate pure and intact DNA from plant tissues, numerous protocols have been established (Saghai-Maroof et al. 1984; Doyle and Doyle 1990; Scott and Playford 1996; Sharma et al. 2000; Pirttilä et al. 2001; Drábková et al. 2002; Shepherd et al. 2002; Mogg and Bond 2003; Haymes 1996). However, plant species belonging to the same or related genera can exhibit enormous variability in the complexity of pathways of dispensable functions. Thus, these DNA extraction protocols cannot be reproduced for all plant species (Porebski et al. 1997; Ribeiro and Lovato 2007). The cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and its modifications have been used to obtain good quality total DNA for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based downstream applications. Various commercial extraction kits such as DNeasy Plant Mini kits (Qiagen Valencia, CA, USA) are available, but the main problem with these commercially available kits is their high cost per sample (Ahmed et al. 2009). The use of multiple extraction protocols is laborious, time consuming and expensive. These necessitate the development of a universal protocol for isolating DNA from different plant species. In many cases, it has been observed that different methods are usually used for extraction of plant genomic DNA (Doyle and Doyle 1990; Porebski et al. 1997) and DNA of viruses (Thomas and Dietzgen 1991; Xei and Hu 1995; Ahlawat et al. 1996) associated with the plant. The members of the order Zingiberales contain a high amount of polysaccharides and polyphenols. Secondary metabolites and polysaccharides interfere with total DNA isolation procedures and PCR based downstream applications. The removal of such contaminants needs complicated and time-consuming protocols. Here, in the present study, we describe a simple, rapid, reliable and inexpensive CTAB based method for the extraction of high quality total DNA of different species of Zingiberales and associated viruses. The isolated high quality genomic DNA is amenable to RAPD (Random amplified Polymorphic DNA), ISSR (Inter-simple sequence repeats), amplification of plant barcode genes (ITS and trnL-F) and detection of virus associated with Musa with reduced cost and health concerns.

Material and methods

Plant material

Fresh, young and tender leaves of five different species of the order Zingiberales (Kaempferia galanga, Kaempferia marginata, Zingiber officinale, Zingiber zerumbet, Musa sp.) which contain high amounts of polysaccharides and polyphenols were collected and wiped with 70% ethanol. For PCR based detection of virus, leaves of banana plant infected with two viruses associated with Musa sp. i.e. Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) and Banana streak virus (BSV) were collected. A minimum of ten replicates were taken for each species.

Reagents

100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8),

1.4 M Sodium Chloride (NaCl),

20 mM-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (pH 8),

2% (w/v) Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)

Chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1)

Isopropanol, 70% ethanol

TE buffer (pH 8): 10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA

0.5× Tris/Borate/EDTA (TBE) (10× stock contained 1 M Tris, 0.8 M boric acid, 0.5 M EDTA)

Agarose (molecular grade)

DNA extraction protocol

  1. 1.

    Preheat the extraction buffer containing 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8), 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM

    EDTA (pH 8), 2% (w/v) CTAB in water bath at 60°C for about 15 minutes.

     
  2. 2.

    Submerge 1 g of plant tissue in 5 ml of absolute alcohol for 5 minutes and allow alcohol to evaporate.

     
  3. 3.

    Grind the tissue in presence of 1% PVP (Polyvinylpyrrolidone) and pre-warmed extraction buffer by using a pre-chilled mortar and pestle (-40°C/-80°C) at room temperature.

     
  4. 4.

    Transfer the ground material into 2 ml centrifuge tubes and incubate in water bath at 60°C for 1 hour.

     
  5. 5.

    Centrifuge the tubes at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C and collect the supernatant in 1.5 ml centrifuge tube using wide bored tip.

     
  6. 6.

    To the supernatant add equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and mix by inversion for 15 minutes.

     
  7. 7.

    Centrifuge the tubes at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C and collect the supernatant in 1.5 ml centrifuge tube.

     
  8. 8.

    Again add equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) to the supernatant and mix by inversion for 15 minutes.

     
  9. 9.

    Centrifuge the tubes at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C and collect the supernatant.

     
  10. 10.

    To the supernatant add twice the volume of chilled isopropanol to precipitate the DNA and incubate it at -20°C for 30 minutes.

     
  11. 11.

    Centrifuge the tubes at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C and collect the pellet.

     
  12. 12.

    Wash the pellet 2–3 times with 70% ethanol and air dry the pellet in room temperature.

     
  13. 13.

    Add 50–100 μl of TE buffer to dissolve the DNA.

     
  14. 14.

    Store at -20°C for further use.

     

Quantification and visualization of DNA

DNA was quantified by measuring optical density (O.D.) at A260 and A280 with a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (ND2000). Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 1× TBE buffer for 1 hour at 80 V. 5 μl of the isolated genomic DNA was loaded on 0.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide to check DNA quality. The gels were photographed under a Gel Documentation system (Perkin Elmer Geliance 200).

RAPD and ISSR study

PCR amplification of ten replicates of genomic DNA of Zingiber zerumbet and Zingiber officinale was carried out using RAPD and ISSR primers respectively which were synthesized by Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., India as per the sequence of Operon Technologies, Inc., USA. PCR amplifications were performed routinely using the following PCR reaction mixture: 25 μl contained 50 ng of template DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM of magnesium chloride (MgCl2) 200 μM of deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 10 picomol of each primer, and 1 U of Taq polymerase. PCR amplification was carried out in a thermal Cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler Pro S). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles each of 1 min at 94°C (denaturation), 1 min at 37°C (annealing), 2 min at 72°C (extension) followed by one final extension of 7 min at 72°C. The annealing temperatures of ISSR primers were different for each primer depending upon the melting temperature. The amplification products were electrophoresed in 1.8% agarose gels in 0.5× TBE (10× stock contained 1 M Tris, 0.8 M boric acid, 0.5 M EDTA) and stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml). The gels were photographed under a Gel Documentation system (Perkin Elmer Geliance 200).

ITS and trnL-F gene amplification

Genomic DNA of Kaempferia galanga and Kaempferia marginata isolated by the present method was used as template for nuclear and chloroplast gene amplification. Ten replicates of Kaempferia galanga DNA was amplified with primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGATGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′). Ten replicates of using Kaempferia marginata DNA was amplified with primers trnL-Fc (5′-GAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG-3′) and trnL-Ff (5′-ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG-3′). The PCR reaction mixture composition was same as that used for RAPD analysis. The reaction mixture of 25 μl contained 50 ng of template DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 0.25 μM of each primer, and 1 U of Taq polymerase. PCR amplification was carried out in a thermal Cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler pro S). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles each of 1 min at 94°C (denaturation), 1 min at 59.3°C for ITS1 and ITS4 and 61.8°C for trnL-Fc and trnL-Ff (annealing), 2 min at 72°C (extension) followed by one final extension of 7 min at 72°C. The amplification products were electrophoresed in 1.8% agarose gels in 0.5× TBE (10× stock contained 1 M Tris, 0.8 M boric acid, 0.5 M EDTA) and stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml). The gels were photographed under a Gel Documentation system (Perkin Elmer Geliance 200).

Virus DNA detection

BBTV and BSV were detected by PCR using specific primers of BBTV: BTVCPF (forward primer) 5′- GCTAGGTATCCGAAGAAATC-3′, BTVCPR (reverse primer) 5′- TCAAACATGATATGTAATTC-3′ (Burns et al. 1995) and BSV: Mys-F1 5′- TAAAAGCACAGCTCAGAACAAACC-3′, Mys R1 5′-CTCCGTGATTTCTTCGTGGTC-3′ (Geering et al. 2000). Virus DNA amplifications were performed routinely using PCR reaction mixture of 25 μl containing 100 ng of template DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 m MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTPs, 50 ng forward primer, 50 ng reverse primer and 1 U of Taq polymerase. PCR amplification was carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler Pro S). Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: BBTVCPF- 94°C for 3 min, then subjected to 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 50°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min; and finally 1 cycle of 72°C for 10 min and for BSV Mys F1and R1- 94° 4 min, 50° 1 min; 72° 2 min for 1 cycle, then subjected to 30 cycles 94° 1 min; 50° 1 min; 72° 2 min and finally 1 cycle of 72° 10 min. Amplification products were electrophoresed in 1.8% agarose gels in 0.5× TBE (10× stock contained 1 M Tris, 0.8 M boric acid, 0.5 M EDTA) and stained with ethidium bromide(0.5 μg/ml). The gels were photographed under a Gel Documentation system (Perkin Elmer Geliance 200).

Results and discussion

In this study, DNA quality was assayed by gel electrophoresis and intense bands were seen on 0.8% agarose. Genomic DNA isolated using CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1990) did not produce distinct and intact band (Figures 1 and 2 lane-1) and presence of smear which hinders PCR downstream applications for producing scorable bands. However, total genomic DNA prepared with our protocol showed no degradation and smear (Figure 2 lane 2–6). The success of the optimized extraction method in obtaining high-quality genomic DNA from all the tested Zingiberales demonstrated the broad applicability of the method. Although, better yield was obtained in case of Kaempferia galanga using traditional method, the quality of the band was not good (Table 1). However, in other species better yield and quality was obtained using our method (Table 1). The average yield of total nucleic acid from 1 g of plant material using our method ranged from 879.59 μg/μl to 2350.81 μg/μl which is much higher than those obtained with kits and normal CTAB method. The highest concentration of DNA was obtained in Kaempferia galanga (Table 1). Tukey’s comparison test showed the average yield of K. galanga was significantly higher than other species (Table 1). The A260/A280 ratio was in the range of 1.82 to 1.94 which indicated the purity of the nucleic acid obtained using our method and insignificant/low levels of proteins and polysaccharide contamination. Although, there was significant difference in the concentration of DNA, variance analysis showed that there was no significant difference in purity of the nucleic acid obtained using our method. Previous reports on high-quality plant DNA extraction methods (Aljanabi and Martinez 1997; Zhang and Steward 2000; Karakousis and Langridge 2003; Manen et al. 2005; Bokszczanin and Przybyla 2006; Chakraborti et al. 2006; Arbi et al. 2009; Biswas and Biswas 2011; Japelaghi et al. 2011) used liquid nitrogen, lyophilization (freeze-drying), alternating cold (about -80°C), enzymatic digestion for grinding and/or rupturing of the cell and nuclear walls. However, recently, a modified DNA extraction protocol which neither utilizes liquid nitrogen, lyophilization (freeze-drying), alternating cold (about -80°C), nor enzymatic digestion for grinding and/or rupturing of the cell and nuclear walls, has been reported (Agbagwa et al. 2012). Using their method, one person is able to process as many as 200 samples in a 5-day working period with a labor cost as low as 100 to US$110 or between 1.8 and US$2 per leaf sample. However in the method reported here, unlike that reported above (Agbagwa et al. 2012), no hazardous chemicals such as β-mercaptoethanol, phenol and Rnase were used. In comparison with recently reported method (Agbagwa et al. 2012) which took 220 minutes approximately, this method eliminates much of the time consuming steps allowing the whole procedure to be completed within 160 minutes. High purity DNA is required for PCR and other PCR-based techniques, such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), micro- and macrosatellite analyses, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) used for genome mapping and DNA fingerprinting (Khanuja et al. 1999). The DNA extracted by this method yielded reproducible and scorable bands proving its suitability for PCR applications using RAPD (Figure 3), ISSR (Figure 4), nuclear and chloroplast gene marker for diverse molecular studies (Figures 5 and 6) and also for detection of viruses (Figures 7 and 8). This protocol involves less steps, and time therefore is more economical (as cost per sample is reduced) when compared to traditional techniques (Nickrent 1994) (Triboush et al. 1998). The efficiency and the speed of this method together with the use of inexpensive facilities and the absence of toxic chemicals make the present method a noticeable alternative for the extraction of high quality and yield of nucleic acid from most plant species, especially from members of the order Zingiberales. The modified CTAB method described in this paper has already been adopted for routine use in our laboratory. This method is widely applicable to extract total DNA from the members of order Zingiberales and its associated viruses. Furthermore, since, less steps and time are involved, this method is more economical. Hence, our protocol is more suitable for developing countries in Africa and Asia.
Figure 1

Electrophoresis of total DNA extracted from different species of Zingiberales using CTAB method, lane 1–2: Genomic DNA of Kaempferia marginata , 3–4: Genomic DNA of Zingiber officinale , 5–6: Genomic DNA of Zingiber zerumbet , 7–8: Genomic DNA of Musa sp. in 0.8% agarose.

Figure 2

Electrophoresis of total DNA extracted from different species of Zingiberales, lane 1- Genomic DNA of Kaempferia galanga isolated using CTAB method, 2- Genomic DNA of Kaempferia galanga using our method, 3- Genomic DNA of Kaempferia marginata using our method, 4- Genomic DNA of Zingiber officinale using our method, 5- Genomic DNA of Zingiber zerumbet using our method, 6- Genomic DNA of Musa sp. using our method in 0.8% agarose.

Table 1

Quantitative estimates of DNA concentration revealed by Nanodrop Spectrophotometer

Species

Concentration of DNA obtained using CTAB method μg/μl*

Concentration of DNA obtained using our method μg/μl*

A260/A280* (CTAB method)

A260/A280* (our method)

Kaempferia galanga

2456.20a

2350.81a

3.32b

1.82a

Kaempferia marginata

56.26b

879.59b

2.61a

1.94a

Zingiber officinale

31.23c

1287.75b

2.62a

1.94a

Zingiber zerumbet

99.20d

1305.59b

3.73b

1.85a

Musa sp.

73.83e

1065.97b

2.64a

1.93a

*Means of 10 samples.

*Means followed by same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05, according to Tukey’s comparison test.

Figure 3

RAPD profile of Zingiber zerumbet using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA with OPC-09 (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1 to10- replicates of Zingiber zerumbet ).

Figure 4

ISSR profile of Zingiber officinale using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA with ISSR-6 (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1 to10- replicates of Zingiber officinale ).

Figure 5

Amplification of ITS gene of Kaempferia galanga using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1 to10- replicates of Kaempferia galanga ).

Figure 6

Amplification of trnlf gene of Kaempferia marginata using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1 to10- replicates of Kaempferia marginata ).

Figure 7

PCR based detection of BBTV using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1-Uninfected Musa sp. used as control; 2 to10- replicates of infected Musa sp. with BBTV).

Figure 8

PCR based detection of BSV using the DNA extracted by our method as template DNA (M-100 bp DNA ladder; 1-Uninfected Musa sp. used as control; 2 to10- replicates of infected Musa sp. with BSV).

Abbreviation

AFLP: 

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

BBTV: 

Banana bunchy top virus

BSV: 

Banana streak virus

CTAB: 

Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide

dNTPs: 

Deoxynucleotide triphosphates

EDTA: 

Ethylene diaminetetraaceticacid

HCl: 

Hydrochloric acid

ISSR: 

Inter-simple sequence repeats

ITS: 

Internal transcribed spacer

MgCl2: 

Magnesim chloride

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

RAPD: 

Random amplified polymorphic DNA

RFLP: 

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

TBE: 

Tris/borate/EDTA

TE: 

Tris EDTA.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India, New Delhi, India for financial assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medicinal Plants & Horticultural Resources Division, Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development, Takyelpat Institutional Area

References

  1. Agbagwa IO, Datta S, Patil PG, Singh P, Nadarajan N: A protocol for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from legumes. Genet Mol Res 2012, 11(4):4632-4639. 10.4238/2012.September.14.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlawat YS, Pant RP, Lockhart BEL, Srivastava M, Chakraborty NK, Varma A: Association of a badnavirus with citrus mosaic disease in India. Plant Dis 1996, 80: 590-592. 10.1094/PD-80-0590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed I, Islam M, Arshad W, Mannan A, Ahmad W, Mirza B: High quality plant DNA extraction for PCR: an easy approach. J Appl Genet 2009, 50: 105-107. 10.1007/BF03195661View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Aljanabi SM, Martinez I: Universal and rapid salt extraction of high quality DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 4692-4693. 10.1093/nar/25.22.4692View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbi G, Naceur B, Chokri M, Mohamed B, et al.: A simple, rapid and efficient method for the extraction of genomic DNA from Allium roseum L. (Alliaceae). Afr J Biotechnol 2009, 8: 4020-4024.Google Scholar
  6. Biswas K, Biswas R: A modified method to isolate genomic DNA from plants without liquid nitrogen. Curr Sci 2011, 100: 1622-1624.Google Scholar
  7. Bokszczanin K, Przybyla AA: Copper (II) acetate improves the quality of pear (Pyrus) DNA during extraction. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2006, 24: 249a-249d. 10.1007/BF02914065View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns TM, Harding RM, Dale JL: The genome organization of banana bunchy top virus: analysis of six ssDNA components. J Gen Virol 1995, 76: 1471-1482. 10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1471View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborti D, Sarkar A, Gupta S, Das S: Small and large scale genomic DNA isolation protocol for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), suitable for molecular marker and transgenic analyses. Afr J Biotechnol 2006, 5: 585-589.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12: 13-15.Google Scholar
  11. Drábková L, Kirschner J, Vlcek C: Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2002, 20: 161-175. 10.1007/BF02799431View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Geering ADW, McMichael LA, Dietzegen RG, Thomas JE: Genetic diversity among Banana Streak Virus isolates from Australia. Phytopathology 2000, 90: 921-927. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.8.921View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Haymes KM: Mini-prep method suitable for a plant breeding program. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1996, 14: 280-284. 10.1007/BF02671664View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Japelaghi RH, Haddad R, Garoosi GA: Rapid and efficient isolation of high quality nucleic acids from plant tissues rich in polyphenols and polysaccharides. Mol Biotechnol 2011, 49: 129-137. 10.1007/s12033-011-9384-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Karakousis A, Langridge P: A high-throughput plant DNA extraction method for marker analysis. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2003, 21: 95a-95f. 10.1007/BF02773402View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Khanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Kumar S: Rapid isolation of DNA from dry and fresh samples of plants producing large amounts of secondary metabolites and essential oils. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1999, 17: 1-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Manen JF, Sinitsyna O, Aeschbach L, Markov AV, et al.: A fully automatable enzymatic method for DNA extraction from plant tissues. BMC Plant Biol 2005, 5: 23. 10.1186/1471-2229-5-23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mogg RJ, Bond JM: A cheap, reliable and rapid method of extracting highquality DNA from plants. Mol Ecol Notes 2003, 3: 666-668. 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00548.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nickrent DL: From field to film: rapid sequencing methods for the field collected plant species. Biotech 1994, 16: 470-475.Google Scholar
  20. Pirttilä MA, Hirsikorpi M, Kämäräinen T, Jaakola L, Hohtola A: DNA isolation methods for medicinal and aromatic plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2001, 19(3):273. doi: 10.1007/BF02772901 10.1007/BF02772901View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR: Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1997, 15: 8-15. 10.1007/BF02772108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ribeiro RA, Lovato MB: Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols in fresh and herbarium specimens of the genus Dalbergia. Genet Mol Res 2007, 6: 173-187.Google Scholar
  23. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW: Ribosomal DNAsepacer-length polymorphism in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1984, 81: 8014-8019. 10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott KD, Playford J: DNA extraction technique for PCR in rain forest plant species. Biotechniques 1996, 20: 974-979.Google Scholar
  25. Sharma KK, Lavanya M, Anjaiah V: A method for isolation and purification of peanut genomic DNA suitable for analytical applications. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2000, 18: 393a-393h. 10.1007/BF02825068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepherd M, Cross M, Stokoe RL, Scott LJ, et al.: High throughput DNA extraction from forest trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2002, 20: 425. 10.1007/BF02772134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas JE, Dietzgen RG: Purification, characterization and serological detection of virus-like particles associated with banana bunchy top disease in Australia. J Gen Virol 1991, 72: 217-224. 10.1099/0022-1317-72-2-217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Triboush SO, Danilenko NG, Davydenko OG: A method for isolation of chloroplast DNA and mitochondrial DNA from sunflower. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1998, 16: 183-189. 10.1023/A:1007487806583View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Xei WS, Hu JS: Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and detection of banana bunchy top virus in Hawaii. Phytopathology 1995, 85(3):339-347. 10.1094/Phyto-85-339View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang J, Steward JMD: Economical and rapid method for extracting cotton genomic DNA. J Cotton Sci 2000, 4(3):193-201.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Devi et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.