Rooting and acclimatization of micropropagated marubakaido apple rootstock using Adesmia latifolia rhizobia
© Muniz et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 5 March 2013
Accepted: 15 August 2013
Published: 4 September 2013
In vitro rooting and the acclimatization of micropropagated rootstocks of apple trees is essential for plant development in the field. The aim of this work was to assess the use of rhizobia of Adesmia latifolia to promote rooting and acclimatization in micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock. An experiment involving in vitro rooting and acclimatization was performed with four strains of rhizobium and two controls, one with and the other without the addition of synthetic indoleacetic acid. The inoculated treatments involved the use of sterile inoculum and inoculum containing live rhizobia. The most significant effects on the rooting rate, primary-root length, number of roots, root length, fresh-shoot biomass, and fresh-root biomass were obtained by inoculation with strain EEL16010B and with synthetic indole acetic acid. However, there was no difference in the growth of apple explants in the acclimatization experiments. Strain EEL16010B can be used to induce in vitro rooting of the Marubakaido rootstock and can replace the use of synthetic indoleacetic acid in the rooting of this cultivar.
KeywordsAuxins Micropropagation Apple Indoleacetic acid
Apples are a primary fruit species throughout the world, with an annual production of 64.3 million tons (Dobránszki & da Silva 2010). In 2009, Brazil produced 1.22 million tons over a cultivated area of approximately 39,000 hectares (IBGE, 2010). Due to the importance of this agribusiness, seedlings of high genetic and phytosanitary quality must be produced using efficient methods such as micropropagation (Abreu & Pedrotti, 2003).
Micropropagation has the primary advantage of producing disease-free plant clones and consists of a four-stage process: in vitro establishment, shoot multiplication, in vitro rooting of microcuttings, and acclimatization (George & Debergh, 2008).
In vitro rooting is a critical phase of micropropagation because depends on the genotype and physiological condition at the time of root induction (Martins & Pedrotti, 2001). The stage following rooting is called acclimatization and is necessary because the in vitro plants are cultivated under heterotrophic conditions (Hazarika, 2003). Morphological anomalies, such as non-functional stomata, and physiological anomalies, such as a decrease in photosynthesis, might occur during this process (Rogalski et al. 2003). These anomalies interfere with plant survival in the greenhouse or field. Therefore, acclimatization is critical for the transition of micropropagated plants from in vitro cultivation to ex vitro cultivation.
Most studies of apple in vitro rooting used synthetic auxins, such as indole butyric acid (IBA) and indoleacetic acid (IAA) with different rootstocks and scion cultivars. In contrast, acclimatization studies have focused on the use of different substrates, such as mixtures of peat and sand (3:1) for the M9 rootstock and peat, perlite and vermiculite (4:1:1) for the cultivars of Golden Delicious and Royal Gala (Dobránszki & da Silva 2010).
The in vitro rooting of plants using rhizobacteria has been studied previously in the micropropagation of olive and pine using Pseudomonas and Agrobacterium rhizogenes, respectively (Peyvandi et al. 2010; Villalobos-Amador et al. 2002). Acclimatization by the inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has also been successful (Locatelli & Lovato, 2002; Cavallazzi et al. 2007). The replacement of IAA, an easy-to-find and inexpensive auxin, with a rhizobia plant-growth promoting inoculant for the micropropagation of apple rootstocks, which is a time-consuming process, may provide a growth advantage under field conditions. However, this work did not study the development of plants under field conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of inoculation with rhizobia of Adesmia latifolia, instead of synthetic IAA, to promote the rooting and acclimatization of Marubakaido apple (Malus prunifolia Borkh) micropropagated rootstock. Although this work does not evaluate the development of plants under field conditions, as far we know there are no reports in the literature evaluating the use of rhizobia for the rooting and acclimatization of apple in vitro. Therefore, this is the first study to evaluate plant-growth promoting rhizobia for rooting and acclimatization in vitro for the micropropagated rootstocks of apple trees.
Materials and methods
Twenty rhizobia strains that were isolated from the root nodules of Adesmia latifolia, supplied by Epagri’s Laboratory of Biotechnology, were analyzed in terms of their production of the auxin IAA using a colorimetric method developed by (Asghar et al. 2002). The rhizobacteria isolates were grown on YMA (yeast-mannitol-agar) medium supplemented with tryptophan (50 mg L-1) for 72 hours at 28°C with agitation at 120 rpm. Next, a 50-μL aliquot of bacterial suspension was added to 96-well polystyrene microplates. A Salkovski reagent was then added, and the suspension was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. A change in color from yellow to pink indicated the production of IAA in the reaction due to the oxidation of indole compounds by ferric salts. The concentration of IAA produced by bacteria was estimated by adjusting the regression curve obtained from the YMA incubation medium with known amounts of synthetic IAA (0, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μg L-1). The IAA concentration was determined using a wavelength of 492 nm on an ELx800 absorbance microplate reader (BioTek®). The experimental design was completely randomized with four replications. Rhizobia isolates with higher IAA production were used in the experiment for in vitro rooting and acclimatization of the Marubakaido apple rootstock. The research was conducted during October and November of 2010. Both the rooting and acclimatization experiments were carried out over 30 days.
The in vitro rooting experiment used explants of Marubakaido apple rootstock that were propagated according to the protocol described by (Giacobbo et al. 2003). Cultivation was conducted on MS medium (Murashige & Skoog 1962) with a reduction of 25% and 33% in ammonium nitrate and potassium nitrate, respectively. Therefore, the medium was composed of the following salts: potassium phosphate (0.17 g of KH2PO4. L-1), magnesium sulfate (0.37 g of MgSO4.7H2O. L-1), copper sulfate (0.025 mg of CuSO4.5H2O. L-1), iron sulfate (27.8 mg of FeSO4.7H2O. L-1), manganese sulfate (22.3 mg of MnSO4.4H2O. L-1), zinc sulfate (8.6 mg of ZnSO4.7 H2O.L-1), sodium molybdate (0.25 mg of Na2MoO4.2H2O. L-1), ammonium nitrate (1.24 g of NH4NO3. L-1), potassium nitrate (1.27 g of KNO3. L-1), calcium chloride (0.44 g of CaCl2.2H2O. L-1), sodium EDTA (37.3 mg of Na2EDTA. L-1), cobalt chloride (0.025 mg of CoCl2.6H2O. L-1) and potassium iodide (0.83 mg of KI.L-1). The carbon sources in this medium were sucrose (30 g. L-1) and myo-inositol (0.1 g. L-1), and vitamins were added, including nicotinic acid (0.5 mg. L-1), thiamin (0.1 mg. L-1), pyridoxine (0.5 mg. L-1), and glycine (2.0 mg. L-1). Agar (6 gL-1) was used as a gelling agent, and benzylaminopurine (0.8 mg BAP. L-1) was used as a growth regulator. The treatments consisted of explants inoculated with the following rhizobia: EEL0210, EEL16110, EEL16010B, EEL37810, and EEL16010B, which were grown in a liquid YMA medium with tryptophan. After determining the concentration of the IAA produced, an aliquot corresponding to a final concentration of 1 mg of IAA.L-1 was taken from the culture medium. This aliquot was added to the culture medium before and after autoclaving at 121°C for 15 minutes. Then, the broth was added to sterile culture medium at a temperature of 50°C to prevent the microorganisms from dying. Thus, a rooting culture media was used with dead (S) and living (L) rhizobia cells. Furthermore, two treatments without inoculation were used: one with the addition of 1 mg of synthetic IAA.L-1 and the other without IAA. The design was completely randomized with six replications of five plants.
The experiment used acclimatization explants that were rooted in vitro on an MS medium modified by (Giacobbo et al. 2003) without benzylaminopurine and with the addition of 1 mg of IAA.L-1. Similar to the previously mentioned experiment, the treatments were inoculated with a diluted suspension of rhizobia strains of EEL0210, EEL16110, EEL16010B, EEL37810, and EEL16010B to a concentration of 1 mg of IAA.L-1 in the substrate. In this experiment, we used a randomized block design with five replications of eight plants.
The variables analyzed in both experiments were shoot length (SL), root length (RL), number of primary roots (NPR), number of secondary roots (NSR), number of total roots (NTR), fresh-shoot biomass (FSB) and fresh-root biomass (FRB). The rooting rate was determined in the in vitro experiment, while the explant survival rate of the micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock was determined during the acclimatization experiment. The root length was measured using a method developed by (Tennant 1975) using a Petri dish divided into 1-cm squares. The roots were randomly arranged on a dish and the number of intersections within the lines of the squares were counted. The obtained value was incorporated into the following formula:
RL = N × L × 11/14, where RL = root length in cm; N = number of intersections; L = length of a side of the square.
The IAA production data in the in vitro rooting and acclimatization experiments were evaluated using analysis of variance, and the means were compared using the Scott-Knott test (p <0.05).
Shoot length (SL), root length (RL), number of primary roots (NPR), number of secondary roots (NSR), number of total roots (NTR), fresh-shoot biomass (FSB), and fresh-root biomass (FRB) of micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock during in vitro rooting
Control with synthetic IAA
2.4 ± 0.3 a
10.6 ± 3.7 b
5.3 ± 2.0 a
3.9 ± 1.7 a
9.2 ± 3.8 a
88.3 ± 17.5 a
31.4 ± 9.3 a
2.4 ± 0.3 a
7.4 ± 2.6 c
4.4 ± 1.7 a
4.0 ± 1.7 a
8.4 ± 3.4 a
72.0 ± 14.3 b
19.1 ± 5.6 b
2.5 ± 0.3 a
9.0 ± 3.1 b
3.6 ± 1.4 a
4.2 ± 1.8 a
7.7 ± 3.1 a
84.7 ± 16.8 a
21.8 ± 6.4 b
2.9 ± 0.3 a
13.6 ± 4.7 a
5.4 ± 2.1 a
5.4 ± 2.4 a
9.8 ± 4.0 a
94.3 ± 18.7 a
32.7 ± 9.6 a
2.5 ± 0.3 a
9.4 ± 3.3 b
4.3 ± 1.6 a
2.9 ± 1.3 a
7.1 ± 2.9 b
89.3 ± 17.7 a
18.1 ± 5.3 b
2.7 ± 0.3 a
3.3 ± 1.1 c
1.1 ± 0.4 b
2.7 ± 1.2 a
3.9 ± 1.6 b
58.2 ± 11.5 b
7.6 ± 2.2 c
2.6 ± 0.3 a
5.7 ± 2.0 c
1.9 ± 0.7 b
3.2 ± 1.4 a
5.1 ± 2.1 b
64.1 ± 12.7 b
11.0 ± 3.2 c
2.6 ± 0.3 a
13.1 ± 4.5 a
4.8 ± 1.8 a
6.1 ± 2.7 a
10.9 ± 4.5 a
100.6 ± 19.9 a
27.1 ± 8.0 a
2.5 ± 0.3 a
10.3 ± 3.6 b
4.2 ± 1.6 a
4.8 ± 2.1 a
9.0 ± 3.7 a
91.9 ± 18.2 a
17.6 ± 5.2 b
Control without synthetic IAA
2.6 ± 0.3 a
6.7 ± 2.3 b
3.0 ± 1.1 b
3.6 ± 1.6 a
6.6 ± 2.7 b
85.7 ± 17.0 a
13.0 ± 3.8 c
The rhizobia isolates EEL16010B (S and L), EEL37810 (S and L), EEL16110 (S), and EEL0210 (S) induced in vitro production of primary roots in the Marubakaido rootstock, similar to synthetic IAA. On the other hand, the induction of in vitro production of secondary roots was not significant. The rhizobia isolates EEL16010B (S and L), EEL37810 (L), EEL16110 (S), EEL0210 (S) and synthetic IAA induced the production of a greater number of roots in vitro than the other treatments.
The explants inoculated with broth containing cells of the isolate EEL16010B (S and L) produced longer roots than those inoculated with the other rhizobia studied (Table 1).
The rhizobia isolates EEL0210 (S and L) and EEL16110 (L) induced a lower production of fresh-shoot biomass, most likely because they produced lower root growth of micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock. The isolate EEL16010B (S and L) and the synthetic IAA induced higher production of fresh-root biomass than the other isolates (Table 1).
Shoot length (SL), root length (RL), number of primary roots (NPR), number of secondary roots (NSR), number of total roots (NTR), fresh-shoot biomass (FSB), and fresh-root biomass (FRB) of micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock during acclimatization
2.5 ± 0.2 a
10.6 ± 2.8 a
5.2 ± 0.6 a
8.0 ± 4.1 a
13.2 ± 4.7 a
145.5 ± 22.0 a
19.2 ± 2.8 a
2.5 ± 0.2 a
11.3 ± 3.2 a
5.5 ± 1.6 a
8.9 ± 2.7 a
14.4 ± 4.3 a
165.4 ± 32.3 a
22.1 ± 6.6 a
3.1 ± 0.4 a
14.1 ± 3.3 a
6.5 ± 1.8 a
10.5 ± 2.5 a
17.0 ± 4.2 a
175.3 ± 39.5 a
25.6 ± 7.7 a
2.4 ± 0.4 a
12.7 ± 3.4 a
5.0 ± 1.1 a
10.1 ± 2.5 a
15.1 ± 3.6 a
140.2 ± 23.9 a
24.6 ± 8.4 a
2.6 ± 0.2 a
10.1 ± 3.2 a
5.3 ± 0.6 a
5. 8 ± 1.8 a
11.1 ± 2.4 a
143.2 ± 51.5 a
22.6 ± 10.0 a
IAA production was observed in all rhizobium isolates studied, varying between 12.8 and 50.6 μg of IAA.mL-1. Phytohormone production, particularly of indoleacetic acid (IAA), by rhizobia has been identified as one of the mechanisms promoting growth in non-leguminous plants (Yanni et al. 2001; Chi et al. 2005) in terms of root growth, root hair proliferation, and the improvement of soil water and nutrient absorption by infected plants (Fuentes-Ramírez & Caballero-Mellado 2005). IAA production by rhizobia, ranging from 1.0 to 130.3 mg IAA.mL-1, was also observed in isolates of soybean rhizobia (Chen et al. 2002).
The rooting rates observed in this study in inoculated apple rootstock explants were similar to those reported by (Lima-Nishimura et al. 2003), who used different doses of indolebutyric acid (IBA).
The buds of the explants of the Marubakaido apple rootstock, including both the inoculated treatments and those receiving synthetic IAA in vitro, did not increase in length. This might have occurred because plant elongation is due to a synergistic action of gibberellins (Taiz & Zeiger, 2010). Although gibberellin production was not studied in this experiment, phytohormones other than IAA were also not studied; the lack of bud growth might indicate that the studied bacteria are not able to produce those phytohormones. The mechanism that regulates IAA production in rhizobacteria does not involve gibberellin production. The regulation of IAA production in rhizobacteria occurs through the signaling molecules of acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) that alter the gene expression of auxins in the host plant and increase its endogenous content (Mathesius et al. 2003). Therefore, there is a change in the hormone balance, which alters the development of the roots (Mathesius, 2010).
There was a higher number of primary roots in the explants of the Marubakaido apple rootstock inoculated in vitro with the broth of rhizobia isolates EEL16010B (S and L), EEL37810 (L), EEL16110 (S), and EEL0210 (S) and in those that received synthetic IAA. However, the same stimulatory phenomenon was not observed in the secondary roots. The number of primary roots observed in the present study was similar to the in vitro rooting of Marubakaido apple rootstock (Martins & Pedrotti, 2001) but was higher than that observed by (Lima-Nishimura et al. 2003) with different doses of IBA. However, the explants inoculated with living cells of rhizobia isolates EEL0210 (L) and EEL16110 (L) showed a smaller number of roots compared with the remaining treatments. In the case of the treatments inoculated with broths containing living cells, such differences in primary-root induction could be attributed to a greater or lesser degree of interaction between the living cells of the bacterial isolates with the micropropagated apple rootstock's genotype (Dodd et al. 2010). This interaction might lead to a decrease or increase in root growth (Remans et al. 2008). Inoculation of the broth (both sterile and containing living cells) of isolate EEL16010B in the explants resulted in the production of more elongated roots. The root-elongation values were superior to the ones obtained in the in vitro rooting experiments using synthetic auxins conducted by (Martins & Pedrotti 2001) and (Lima-Nishimura et al. 2003) for the Marubakaido apple rootstock, in which the root length per plant was 3.4 and 1.9 cm, respectively. A similar effect was obtained in the micropropagation of olive trees and of the medicinal plant Chlorophytum borivilianum inoculated with Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens and Piriformospora indica (Peyvandi et al. 2010; Gosal et al. 2010).
The lower production of fresh-shoot biomass in the explants of micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock inoculated with the broth of rhizobia isolates EEL0210 (S and L) and EEL16110 (L) most likely resulted from the smaller root growth observed in these treatments. The isolate EEL16010B (S and L) and synthetic IAA induced a higher production of fresh-root biomass than the other isolates (Table 1). This positive effect on the production of fresh-root biomass was also observed in the micropropagation of Phoitinia inoculated with different species of Azospirillum (Larraburu et al. 2007).
Root-growth stimulation by the microbial isolates was most likely due to an interaction between the genotype of the plant and of the microorganism. This interaction regulates the plant’s response to the auxin (IAA) and its production by the microorganism. Thus, growth was induced by alterations in the root elongation and architecture of the micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock (Dodd et al. 2010).
No differences were observed between the treatments in the acclimatization experiment, most likely due to the short period of observation. Other studies in the literature were conducted over up to 90 days (Thomas et al. 2010). Despite the fact that this experiment did not observe variations between the inoculated treatments and the non-inoculated control, it is not possible to discard the hypothesis that inoculation with rhizobia can be efficient. In other studies, the positive effect of inoculation with plant-growth promoting bacteria has already been established. The acclimatization experiment of Camellia sinensis inoculated with Azospirillum showed changes in the shoot length and fresh weight after a period of 90 days (Thomas et al. 2010). (Oliveira et al. 2010) observed an increase in the shoot and fresh-root weight of Zingiber spectabile inoculated with Bacillus pumillus after three months. In trials with rootstocks of Prunus, plant height effects were observed after a period of between 90 and 150 days after inoculation (Bonaterra et al. 2003).
Our results showed that phyto-stimulating substances were present and active in the EEL1610B broth, even after sterilization by autoclaving. This shows that these substances withstood the heat treatment and that they can become a source of growth factors that may be used for rooting of micropropagated Marubakaido apple rootstock.
The rhizobia isolate EEL1610B can be used to induce in vitro rooting of the Marubakaido apple rootstock. In addition, the broth containing IAA produced by the EEL1610B can be used instead of synthetic indoleacetic acid for the in vitro rooting of the Marubakaido apple rootstock.
We acknowledge financial support from Epagri and Embrapa for the development of this research.
- Abreu MF, Pedrotti EL: Micropropagação da macieira. Rev Biotec Ci Des 2003, 31: 100-108.Google Scholar
- Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Khaliq A: Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth-promoting activities in Brassica juncea L. Biol Fertil Soils 2002, 35: 231-237. 10.1007/s00374-002-0462-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonaterra A, Ruz L, Badosa E, Pinochet J, Montesinos E: Growth promotion of Prunus rootstocks by root treatment with specific bacterial strains. Plant Soil 2003, 255(2):555-569. 10.1023/A:1026033115984View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cavallazzi JRP, Klauberg Filho O, Sturmer SL, Rygiewicz PT, Mendonça MM: Screening and selecting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for inoculating micropropagated apple rootstocks in acid soils. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 2007, 90: 117-129. 10.1007/s11240-006-9163-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen LS, Figueredo A, Villani H, Michajluk J, Hungria M: Diversity and symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobia isolated from field-grown soybean nodules in Paraguay. Biol Fertil Soils 2002, 35: 448-457. 10.1007/s00374-002-0493-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chi F, Shen S-H, Cheng H-P, Jing Y-G, Dazzo FB: Ascending migration of Endophytic Thizobia, from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71: 7271-7278. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7271-7278.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dobránszki J, Teixeira da Silva JA: Micropropagation of apple-a review. Biotechnol Adv 2010, 28(4):462-488. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dodd IC, Zinovkina NY, Safronova VI, Belimov AA: Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status. Ann Appl Biol 2010, 157(3):361-379. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00439.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuentes-Ramírez LE, Caballero-Mellado J: Bacterial biofertilizers. In PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Edited by: Siddiqui ZA. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2005:143-172.Google Scholar
- George EF, Debergh PC: Micropropagation: uses and methods. In Plant propagation by tissue culture. 3rd edition. Edited by: George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2008:29-64.Google Scholar
- Giacobbo CL, Gomes FRC, Kroth LL, Conceição MK, Fortes GRL: Multiplicação in vitro de porta-enxerto de macieira cv. Marubakaido ( Malus prunifolia willd, borkh) com diferentes níveis de benzilaminopurina e ácido naftalenacético. R bras Agroc 2003, 9(1):31-33.Google Scholar
- Gosal SK, Karlupia A, Gosal SS, Chhiba IM, Varma A: Biotization with piriformospora indica and Pseudomonas fluorescens improves survival rate, nutrient acquisition, field performance and saponine content of micropropagated Chlorophytum sp. Indian J Biotechnol 2010, 9: 289-297.Google Scholar
- Hazarika BN: Acclimatization of tissue-cultured plants. Curr Sci 2003, 85(12):1704-1712.Google Scholar
- IBGE: Produção agrícola municipal. 2010. http://www.ibge.gov.br Google Scholar
- Larraburu EE, Carletti SM, Cáceres EAR, Llorente BE: Micropropagation of photinia employing rhizobacteria to promote root development. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26: 711-717. 10.1007/s00299-006-0279-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lima-Nishimura N, Quoirin M, Naddaf YG, Wilhelm HM, Ribas LLF, Sierakowski MR: A xyloglucan from seeds of the native Brazilian species Hymenaea courbaril for micropropagation of Marubakaido and Ionagored apples. Plant Cell Rep 2003, 21: 402-407.Google Scholar
- Locatelli LM, Lovato PE: Inoculação micorrízica e aclimatização de dois porta-enxertos de macieira micropropagados. Pesq agropec bras 2002, 37: 177-184. 10.1590/S0100-204X2002000200009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martins L, Pedrotti EL: Enraizamento in vitro e ex vitro dos porta-enxertos de macieira M7, M9 e Marubakaido. Rev Bras Frutic 2001, 23(1):11-16.Google Scholar
- Mathesius U: The role of auxin in root-symbiont and root-pathogen interactions – from development to defense. In Progress in botany 71. Edited by: Luttge UE, Beyschlag W, Budel B, Francis D. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2010:185-210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mathesius U, Mulders S, Gao M, Teplitski M, Caetano-Anollés G, Rolfe BG, Bauer WD: Extensive and specific responses of a eukaryote to bacterial quorum-sensing signals. PNAS 2003, 100(3):1444-1449. 10.1073/pnas.262672599View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol plant 1962, 15: 473-497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oliveira JRG, Moraes TAL, Melo NF, Yano-Melo AM: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the acclimatization of zingiber spectabile . Bragantia 2010, 69(3):687-694. 10.1590/S0006-87052010000300021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peyvandi M, Farahani F, Mazinani MH, Noormohamadi Z, Ataii S, Asgharzade A: Pseudomonas fluorescent and its ability to promote root formation of olive microshoots. Int J Plant Prod 2010, 4(1):63-66.Google Scholar
- Remans R, Beebe S, Blair M, Manrique G, Tovar E, Rao I, Croonenborghs A, Torres-Gutierrez R, El-Howeity M, Michiels J, Vanderleyden J: Physiological and genetic analysis of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Soil 2008, 302: 149-161. 10.1007/s11104-007-9462-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogalski M, Moraes LKA, Felisbino C, Crestani L, Guerra MP, Silva AL: Aclimatização de porta-enxertos de Prunus sp. micropropagados. Rev Bras Frutic 2003, 25(2):279-281. 10.1590/S0100-29452003000200024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taiz L, Zeiger E: Plant physiology. 5th edition. Suderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates; 2010.Google Scholar
- Tennant DA: Test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 1975, 63(3):995-1001. 10.2307/2258617View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas J, Ajay D, Raj Kumar R, Mandal AKA: Influence of beneficial microorganisms during in vivo acclimatization of in vitro-derived tea ( Camelia sinensis ) plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 2010, 101(3):365-370. 10.1007/s11240-010-9687-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villalobos-Amador E, Rodríguez-Hernández G, Pérez-Molphe-Balch E: Organogenesis and Agrobacterium rhizogenes -induced rooting Pinus maximartinezzii Rzedowski and P. pineceana Gordon. Plant Cell Rep 2002, 20: 779-785. 10.1007/s00299-001-0396-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanni YG, Rizk RY, Abd El-Fattah F, Squartini A, Corich V, Giacomini A, de Bruijn F, Rademaker J, Maya-Flores J, Ostrom P, Vega-Hernandez M, Hollingsworth RI, Martinez-Molina E, Mateos P, Velazquez E, Wopereis J, Triplett E, Umali-Garcia M, Anarna JA, Rolfe BG, Ladha JK, Hill J, Mujoo R, Ng PK, Dazzo FB: The beneficial plant growth-promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii with rice roots.Austr. J Plant Physiol 2001, 62: 845-870.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.