Open Access

Estimation of length-weight relationship and condition factor of spotted snakehead Channa punctata (Bloch) under different feeding regimes

  • Surjya Narayan Datta1Email author,
  • Vaneet Inder Kaur1,
  • Asha Dhawan1 and
  • Geeta Jassal1
SpringerPlus20132:436

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-436

Received: 27 June 2013

Accepted: 26 August 2013

Published: 4 September 2013

Abstract

Comparative study was conducted to observe the efficacy of different feeding regimes on growth of Channa punctata. Six iso- proteinous diets were prepared by using different agro industrial by-products. Maximum weight gain was recorded with diet having 66.75% rice bran, 11.50% mustard cake, 23.0% groundnut cake, 5% molasses, 1.5% vitamin-mineral mixture and 0.5% salt with specific growth rate of 0.408. The experimental fish recorded the value of exponent ‘b’ in the range of 2.7675 to 4.3922. The condition factor ‘K’ of all experimental fish was above 1.0 (1.094- 1.235) indicating robustness or well being of experimented fish.

Keywords

Channa punctata Formulated diets Condition factor Correlation coefficient Growth

Introduction

The spotted snakehead, Channa punctata (Bloch) is well known for its taste, high nutritive value and medicinal qualities (Haniffa et al. 2004) and is recommended as a diet during convalescence (Chakraborty 2006). It is distributed throughout the South-East Asian countries and has been identified as a potential species for rearing in paddy fields, derelict and swampy water as it is an air breathing and hardy fish. It has high market value because of the flavour and availability throughout the year. The fish is suitable for both monoculture and polyculture. Good deal of work has been carried out on different aspects of survival and growth, length-weight relationship, condition factor of C. punctata in India and abroad (Victor and Akpocha 1992; Dutta 1994; Bias et al. 1994; Alam and Parween 2001; Islam et al. 2004; Kumar et al. 2013). However, limited studies are conducted on growth and culture potentiality of this species. Therefore the present work has been carried out to study the efficacy of different formulated diets on survival and growth rate of C. punctata.

Materials and methods

Experimental setup

The study was conducted at the Fish Farm of College of Fisheries, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana (Punjab), India (30.54°N latitude, 75.48°E longitude and an altitude of 247 m above mean sea level). The growth of fish was assessed w.r.t. different formulated diets over a period of 90 days. The studies were conducted in PVC cistern (1.50 m×1.0 m ×1.0 m) in triplicate. 5 cm soil bed was provided in each cistern and water depth was maintained 50 cm throughout the study period. Each cistern was stocked with 25 fingerlings (average length = 11.645± 0.3145 cm, average wt. = 11.961 ± 0.1348 g) of Channa punctata collected from wild source.

Formulated diets

Six isonitrogenous diets (33.19 – 35.23% crude protein on dry weight basis) i.e. D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 were formulated using agroindustrial byproducts like rice bran, mustard cake, fish meal, ground nut cake and soybean meal (Tables 1 and 2). For preparation of diets, all feed ingredients (dry) were first grounded to a small particle size in a laboratory electric grinder and sieved through an approximately 250 μm sieve. Ingredients were thoroughly mixed in a food mixer for 15 minutes. Enough water was slowly added to make stiff dough. The wet mixture was steamed for 5 minutes and the diets were produced in a noodle-like shape of 2.0 mm in diameter using a meat grinder. The pelleted diets were dried overnight at 55°C afterwards were broken up and sieved into appropriate pellet sizes. Proximate composition of feed ingredients and formulated diets was determined following the standard methods of AOAC (2005).
Table 1

Percent composition of experimental diets

Ingredients

D1

D2

D3

D4

D5

D6

Rice bran

67.11

73.15

66.75

76.49

71.86

69.29

Mustard cake

10.85

26.92

11.50

7.84

9.38

10.46

Fish meal

21.70

-

-

-

-

6.75

Groundnut cake

-

-

23.0

-

9.38

6.75

Soybean meal

-

-

-

9.38

1.88

6.75

Additives in all diets: Vitamin-mineral mixture = 1.5%, Salt = 0.5%, Molasses = 5%.

Table 2

Proximate composition (% DM basis) of feed ingredients and experimental diets

Ingredients

Moisture

Crude protein

Ether extract

Crude fibre

Ash

NFE

Rice bran

14.20

26.70

1.4

8.89

7.18

41.63

Mustard cake

13.20

57.53

1.5

7.58

7.22

12.97

Fish meal

14.65

46.80

3.0

2.99

29.76

3.25

Groundnut cake

13.95

44.59

2.5

7.81

4.21

26.94

Soybean meal

13.05

66.48

1.5

5.73

5.26

8.01

D1

16.00

34.22

2.66

7.68

16.12

23.32

D2

17.25

33.68

1.45

10.68

7.14

30.29

D3

17.00

34.10

1.90

9.73

5.80

30.34

D4

15.10

33.94

1.12

9.36

5.48

35.60

D5

15.15

33.74

1.75

9.49

6.13

33.94

D6

14.85

34.35

1.95

9.23

10.34

28.49

Feeding of fish

Fish were fed with formulated diets @ 2% of body weight at 10 am daily. The feed quantity was regulated based on the fortnightly sampling of 10 fingerlings from each treatment.

Water analysis

Throughout the study period physico–chemical parameters of water samples including water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, total alkalinity, hardness, NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N and PO4-P were measured following standard methods (APHA 2005).

Growth analysis

Fish were measured in terms of weight gain and increase in length. Total length (TL) was measured to the nearest 0.1 mm using a 30 cm ruler as the distance from the tip of the anterior most part of the body to the tip of the caudal fin. Analytical balances with precision of 0.01 g were used to record body wet weight (BW).

Following growth analysis were calculated

  1. i.

    Specific growth rate SGR = Loge Final weight Loge Initial weight Culture days × 100

     
Where, weight recorded in gram.
  1. ii.
    Length-weight relationship: The length-weight (log-transformed) relationships were determined by linear regression analysis and scatter diagrams of length and weight were plotted. The length-weight relationship of the experimented fish is worked out as per cube law given by Le Cren (1951).
    W = aL b
     

Where, W=Weight of fish (g), L is observed total length (cm), ‘a’ is the regression intercept and ‘b’ is the regression slope.

The logarithmic transformation of the above formula is-
Log W = log a + b log L
  1. iii.
    Fulton’s condition factor (K): Fulton’s condition factor (K) was calculated according to Htun-Han (1978) equation as per formula given below:
    K = W × 100 L 3
     

Where, W=weight of fish (g), L=Length of fish (cm).

Statistical analysis

The analysis of covariance was performed to determine variation in ‘b’ values for each species following method of Snedecor and Cochran (1967). The statistical significance of the isometric exponent (b) was analyzed by a function: ts = (b-3) / Sb (Sokal and Rohlf 1987), where ts is the‘t’ student statistics test value, ‘b’ is the slope and Sb is the standard error of ‘b’. The comparison between obtained values of t-test and the respective critical values allowed the determination of the ‘b’ values statistically significant and their inclusion in the isometric range (b=3) or allometric range (negative allometric; b<3). Statistical software SPSS 14 and PAST Ver. 1.8 used for analysing the data.

Results and discussion

Lower dissolved oxygen content of water did not create any adverse effect on survival and growth of fish because of the accessory respiratory organ present in Channa punctata (Table 3). There were no significant differences in water quality parameters viz. temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, total alkalinity, Hardness, NH3-N, NO3-N, NO2-N and PO4-P observed among different treatments and all these parameters (except dissolved oxygen content) were within the range as suggested by Boyd and Pillai (1984); Rowland (1986) and Boyd and Tucker (1998) but significant variation was observed within a single treatments in time series data of different parameters.
Table 3

Water quality parameters of different treatments

Tanks

D1

D2

D3

D4

D5

D6

Temperature °C

30.450 ± 2.717

30.612 ± 2.717

30.269 ± 2.294

29.821 ± 2.363

29.22 ± 1.683

29.672 ± 1.959

pH

8.070 ± 0.403

8.110 ± 0.428

8.204 ± 0.386

8.171 ± 0.382

8.217 ± 0.376

8.242 ± 0.369

DO (mg/l)

2.355 ± 1.316

2.202 ± 1.356

3.059 ± 1.401

2.611 ± 2.050

2.989 ± 2.187

3.469 ± 2.694

Alkalinity (mg/l)

411.090 ± 43.994

424.363 ± 43.797

363.272 ± 72.901

425.45 ± 46.79

445.09 ± 45.889

404.00 ± 36.57

Hardness (mg/l)

378.667 ± 23.626

340.000 ± 11.313

373.332 ± 26.599

372.00 ± 37.09

362.00 ± 28.33

349.33 ± 24.07

Ammonia (mg/l)

0.3591 ± 0.124

0.4245 ± 0.116

0.320 ± 0.111

0.3409 ± 0.114

0.3273 ± 0.117

0.2909 ± 0.108

Phosphate (mg/l)

1.750 ± 0.765

1.540 ± 0.745

1.654 ± 0.782

1.622 ± 0.707

1.582 ± 0.718

1.613 ± 0.773

Nitrite - NO2 (mg/l)

0.197 ± 0.222

0.182 ± 0.222

0.116 ± 0.222

0.114 ± 0.222

0.077 ± 0.222

0.165 ± 0.222

Nitrate - NO3 (mg/l)

0.308 ± 0.322

0. 340 ± 0.447

0.396 ± 0.428

0.395 ± 0. 361

0.393 ± 0.389

0.349 ± 0.406

Values are Mean ± Standard Deviation.

100% survival of fish was observed in all treatments. Specific growth rate was observed maximum in D3 followed by D4, D5, D2, D6 and D1, respectively (Table 4). Initial and final average weight (g), Length – weight relationship of fishes stocked in different tanks, values of regression co-efficient ‘b’ and logarithmic relationship between length and weight with regression equation is given in Tables 5, 4 and Figure 1. In the present study final ‘b’ varied between 2.7675 to 4.3922. Growth is said to be positive allometric when the weight of an organism increases more than length (`>3) and negative allometric when length increases more than weight (b<3) (Wootton 1992). When TL was regressed with BW, the slope value was significantly lower than critical isometric value i.e. 3, in treatment D1 and D6 indicating negative algometric growth; thus species become slender as it increases in length (Pauly 1984) where as b value was higher than 3 in D2, D3, D4 and D5 treatment, indicating the species becomes heavier for its weight, as it grows longer (Thakur and Das 1974). The results of the present study is in conformity with the views of Le Cren (1951) and Chauhan (1987) that a fish normally does not retain the same shape or body outline throughout their lifespan and specific gravity of tissue may not remain constant, the actual relationship may depart significantly from the cube law. Negative allometric growth pattern have been reported in C. punctata (by Haniffa et al. (2006) and Ali et al. (2002). Negative allometric growth has also been reported in C. maurulius (Dua and Kumar 2006; Rathod et al. 2011) and in C. Striatus (Khan et al. 2011). Variation in slope may be attributed to sample size variation, life stages and environmental factors (Kleanthids et al. 1999). The higher slope of C. punctata in D2, D3, D4 and D5 reflect the faster growth compared to D1 and D6 in the present study.
Table 4

Final length weight relationship of fishes reared in experimental tanks

Tank

Final average weight (g)

Specific growth rate (%/day)

Logarithmic equation Log W = log a + b log L

Correlation coefficient ‘r’

Coefficient of determination ‘r2

Condition factor ‘K’

‘b’

D1

21.67

0.281

Log W = log 0.0151 + 2.7675 log L

0.789

0.622

1.094

2.767

D2

24.25

0.334

Log W = log 0.0003 + 4.3922 log L

0.930

0.865

1.116

4.392

D3

27.77

0.408

Log W = log 0.0011 + 3.866 log L

0.939

0.881

1.210

3.866

D4

25.66

0.376

Log W = log 0.0012 + 3.820 log L

0.944

0.892

1.171

3.820

D5

24.66

0.346

Log W = log 0.0042 + 3.3254 log L

0.876

0.768

1.334

3.325

D6

22.16

0.302

Log W = log 0.0118 + 2.888 log L

0.913

0.834

1.235

2.888

Table 5

Initial length weight relationship of fishes reared in experimental tanks

Tank

Initial average weight (g)

Initial logarithmic equation Log W = log a + b log L

Initial ‘b’ value

D1

12.09

Log W = log 0.0288 + 2.474log L

2.474

D2

12.13

Log W = log 0.0117 + 2.862 log L

2.862

D3

11.91

Log W = log 0.012 + 2.851log L

2.851

D4

11.76

Log W = log 0.0014 + 3.775 log L

3.775

D5

12.04

Log W = log 0.0104 + 2.917log L

2.917

D6

11.84

Log W = log 0.0107+ 2.925log L

2.925

Figure 1

Final logarithmic relationship between length and weight with regression equation of Channa punctata in experimental cysterns.

The condition factor (K) of a fish reflects physical and biological circumstances and fluctuations by interaction among feeding conditions, parasitic infections and physiological factors (Le Cren 1951). This also indicates the changes in food reserves and therefore an indicator of the general fish condition. Moreover, body condition provides an alternative to the expensive in vitro proximate analyses of tissues (Sutton et al. 2000). Therefore, information on condition factor can be vital to culture system management because they provide the producer with information of the specific condition under which organisms are developing (Araneda et al. 2008). The values of condition factor ‘K’ recorded in the present study are 1.094, 1.116, 1.210,1.171, 1.334 and 1.235 in D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6, respectively. Condition factor of greater than one showed the well being of fishes fed with different experimental diets. The values of ‘K’ in D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 were higher than D1, suggesting that fish fed with diet containing different experimental diets (Table 5) were much more robust than the fish fed with diet in D1. The results are conformity with the study of Chandra and Jhan (2010) who recorded the K value of Channa punctata in the range of 1.05 – 1.89.

The co-efficient of determination (r2) values explained the proper fit of the model for growth. In the present study, lowest value of r2 of Channa punctata were recorded as 0.622 (62% variability) in D1 and highest recorded as 0.892 (89% variability) in D4 (Table 4) indicating more than 62% variability by the model and good fitness.

Conclusions

In present study, growth rate, condition factor and co-efficient of determination value recorded on acclimatization of wild stock of C. punctata under experimental condition indicated a favourable response of the fish to the ecological transition from the wild habitat to the experimental environment. The appreciable growth rate exhibited by the fish during rearing period indicated that the prevailing environmental conditions were within the tolerance range for the species. The findings of the present study support that the species can be cultured in large scale as food fish to meet the nutritional demand.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dean, College of Fisheries, GADVASU, Ludhiana for her keen interest and facilities provided for the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Fisheries, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University

References

  1. Alam MM, Parween S: Survivality of Channa punctata (Bloch) in Different Kinds of Container. Pak J Zool 2001, 33(3):259-260.Google Scholar
  2. Ali M, Salam A, Iqbal F, Khan BA: Growth performance of Channa punctata from two ecological regimes of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Biol Sci 2002, 5(10):1123-1125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC: Official methods of analysis, association of official analytical chemists. 18th edition. Gaithersburg: AOAC Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. APHA: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Araneda M, Perez EP, Gasca LE: White shrimp Penaeus vannamei culture in freshwater at three densities: condition state based on length and weight. Aquacult 2008, 283: 13-18. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bias VS, Thakurm SS, Agarwal NC: Food and Feeding Activity of Channa punctata (Bloch). J Freshwater Biol 1994, 6(3):247-251.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd CE, Pillai YK: Water quality management in aquaculture. CMFRI Spec Publ 1984, 22: 97.Google Scholar
  8. Boyd CE, Tucker CS: Pond aquaculture water Quality Management. India: Springer India Pvt ltd; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty NM: Murrels and Murrel Culture. Delhi: Narendra Publishing House; 2006.Google Scholar
  10. Chandra R, Jhan N: The analysis of length-weight relationship of Channa punctata with relative physico-chemical parameters. J Exp Sci 2010, 1(5):4-5.Google Scholar
  11. Chauhan RS: Food, parasites and length-weight relationship of a hill stream fish, Schizothorax plagiostomus (Heckel). Indian J Anim Res 1987, 21(2):93-96.Google Scholar
  12. Dua A, Kumar K: Age and growth patterns in Channa marulius from Harike Wetland (A Ramsar site), Punjab, India. J Environ Biol 2006, 27(2):377-380.Google Scholar
  13. Dutta SPS: Food and feeding habits of Channa punctata (Bloch) inhabiting Gadigarh Stream, Jammu. J Freshwat Biol 1994, 6(4):333-336.Google Scholar
  14. Haniffa MA, Marimuthu K, Nagarajan M, Arokiaraj AJ, Kumar D: Breeding behaviour and parental care of the induced breed spotted Murrel Channa punctata under captivity. Curr Sci 2004, 86(10):1375-1376.Google Scholar
  15. Haniffa MA, Nagarajan M, Gopalakrishnan A: Length-weight relationship of Channa punctata from Western Ghat Rivers of Tamil Nadu. J Appl Ichthyol 2006, 22: 308-309. 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00779.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Htun-Han M: The reproductive biology of the dab Limanda limanada (L.) in the North Sea: gonadosomatic index, hepatosomatic index and condition factor. J Fish Biol 1978, 13(1):351-377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Islam MN, Parween S, Hyder F, Flowra FA, Musad AA: Food and feeding habit of juvenile Channa punctata (Bloch) from a semi closed water body in Chalan Beel Floodplain, Bangladesh. J Biol Sci 2004, 4(3):352-356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan S, Khan MA, Miyan K, Mubark M: Length weight relationships for nine freshwater teleosts collected from River Ganga, India. J Zool Res 2011, 7(6):401-405. 10.3923/ijzr.2011.401.405View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleanthids PK, Sinis AI, Stergiou KI: Length-weight relationships of freshwater fishes in Greece. Naga, ICLARM Q 1999, 22: 37-41.Google Scholar
  20. Kumar K, Lalrinsanga PL, Sahoo M, Mohanty UL, Kumar R, Sahu AK: Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Anabas testudineus and Channa Species under different culture systems. World J Fish Marine Sci 2013, 5(1):74-78.Google Scholar
  21. Le Cren ED: The length-weight relationships and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 1951, 20: 201-219. 10.2307/1540View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pauly D: Fish population dynamics in tropical waters: a manual for use with programmable calculators. ICLARM Stud Rev 1984, 8: 325.Google Scholar
  23. Rathod SR, Shinde SE, More PR: Length-weight relationship in Salmostoma navacula and Channa maurulius Godavari River at Kaigaon Toka, Dist. Aurangabad (M.S.) India. Res Sci Tech 2011, 3(3):104-106.Google Scholar
  24. Rowland SJ: Site selection, design and operation of aquaculture farms. In Freshwater aquaculture in Australia, Brisbane. 1st edition. Edited by: Owen P, Bowden J. Australia: Rural Press Queensland; 1986.Google Scholar
  25. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical methods. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co; 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Introduction to biostatistics. 2nd edition. New York: Freeman Publication; 1987.Google Scholar
  27. Sutton SG, Bult TP, Haedrich RL: Relationships among fat weight, body weight, water weight and condition factors in wild Atlantic salmon parr. T Am Fish Soc 2000, 129: 527-538. 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<0527:RAFWBW>2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Thakur NK, Das MK: Length-weight relationship of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). J Inland Fish Soc India 1974, 6: 95-99.Google Scholar
  29. Victor R, Akpocha BO: The Biology of Snakehead, Channa obscura (Gunther) in a Nigerian Pond under Monoculture. Aquac 1992, 101(1):17-24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wootton RJ: Fish ecology: tertiary level biology. London: Blackie; 1992.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Datta et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.