- Open Access
Obstacles encountered during transradial angiography from after Radial Artery puncture to the aortic arch
SpringerPlus volume 2, Article number: 365 (2013)
To elucidate the key points for safe performance of transradial angiography.
Transradial angiography can be performed safely if attention is paid to the following points from after radial artery puncture to reaching the aortic arch: resistance during guide wire operation for sheath insertion after puncture; confirmation of the superficial brachial artery; guide wire resistance while guiding the catheter to the aortic arch; and aortic arch anomalies.
Transradial angiography (TRA) has a number of advantages compared with transfemoral angiography (TFA), including the fact that postoperative hemostasis can definitely be performed using hemostatic devices rather than manual compression, meaning that anticoagulant therapy need not be discontinued for angiography, and the patient is able to get up immediately after the procedure and is thus more comfortable (Al-Kutoubi et al.1996; Cowling et al.1997; Matsumoto et al.2001; Iwasaki et al.2002; Jo et al.2010). It also has advantages compared with transbrachial angiography, including the fact that anticoagulant therapy need not be discontinued and that the puncture site in the TRA is distant from the median nerve, making it safer than puncturing the brachial artery, which is adjacent to the median nerve (Heenan et al.1996). In coronary angiography, TRA is used not only for diagnosis but also for interventions (Otaki1992; Kiemeneij & Laarman1993), although few institutions use this approach for cerebral (Matsumoto et al.2001; Iwasaki et al.2002; Jo et al.2010) or other angiographies (Al-Kutoubi et al.1996; Cowling et al.1997). Reasons for avoiding TRA include: the narrow diameter of the radial artery, which makes it difficult to puncture; unfamiliarity with the obstacles that can occur along the route to the aortic arch; and the fact that catheter operations in the aortic arch are different from those of TFA. Radiologists engaged in angiography should possess the knowledge required for the safe performance of TRA for angiographic procedures. Focusing on the second reason mentioned above, the objective of this paper is to describe cases selected from around 2700 TRAs for cerebral angiography we performed as illustrative examples, with the aim of contributing to the safe performance of TRA.
1. Sheath insertion
The right radial artery was preferred if the Allen test permitted use of both sides (Iwasaki et al.2002). When the right forearm is set along the torso, the position for the angiographer is almost the same as in the case of a right transfemoral approach. If the right Allen test warned for disconnection between the radial and ulnal arteries, the examination was performed via the left radial artery. After local anesthesia (about 1 or 2 ml of lidocaine 1%), the puncture was performed using a 22G (0.9 mm) puncture needle at the area of 2–5 cm proximal to the radial styloid.
After successful puncture of the radial artery, resistance may be felt when advancing the guide wire (0.025 inch, 0.635 mm) in order to insert the sheath (17 cm length with side holes, Medikit, Japan; 4F or 6F, 6F for the intervention). In such a case, the cause, as described below, must be investigated by confirming the location of the wire tip under fluoroscopy and gently injecting contrast agent from the puncture needle.
Radial artery occlusion
Even if the radial artery is occluded, it may be possible to feel a pulse and carry out puncture successfully. It is difficult, however, to continue the procedure (Figure 1).
Radial artery vasospasm
In young patients, simply puncturing the radial artery can cause vasospasm. A small amount of vasodilator (nitroglycerin 0.2–0.5 mg) should be injected via the puncture needle, and the sheath should be inserted after the artery has dilated (Figure 2).
Mistaken insertion of the guide wire into the recurrent artery
If the tip of the wire is mistakenly inserted into a small artery such as the recurrent artery, ignoring the resistance to the wire and advancing it forcefully will damage the artery, producing a hematoma (Figure 3). If the wire consistently advances into the smaller artery, it is safer to advance it while referring to the map image produced by contrast agent injection.
Radial artery flexion
With radial artery flexion due to arteriosclerosis, if the wire is passed through the site of flexion, the artery will extend along the course of the wire, permitting the sheath to be inserted without further action (Figure 4a, b). In the case of flexion at the anastomotic branch of the superficial brachial artery (SBA) described below, even if the wire does pass, the artery will not extend along the course of the wire, and sheath insertion must be abandoned (Figure 4c).
2. Passing the catheter through the brachial artery
After inserting the sheath, resistance to guide wire operation in the elbow or upper arm may be felt when advancing the guide wire (0.035 inch, 0.889 mm) to guide the catheter to the aortic arch. Possible reasons for this include: the wire having entered a small artery such as the recurrent artery or a muscular branch; sharp flexion of the brachial artery; occlusion between the brachial artery and the aortic arch; or encountering the SBA. Careful observation in the same way as during sheath insertion will enable the operator to realize if the wire has entered a branch of the brachial artery, and forceful operation must therefore be avoided. In most cases, flexion of the brachial artery is due to arteriosclerosis, and if a guide wire can pass through, it will extend along the course of the wire (Figure 5). The difference in right and left blood pressures is useful to predict occlusion along the route to the aortic arch.
Superficial brachial artery (SBA)
This has been reported in anatomical studies with frequencies of 10% (Adachi1928) and 13% (Lippert & Pabst1985), but in the authors’ experience of angiography it has been 6.7%. If the SBA is extremely narrow, vasospasm occurs when the sheath is inserted, conceivably preventing its identification (Figure 4c). The arteries in the arm have many variants, and these are more easily understood in relation to their development, as shown in Figure 6. Because the SBA is not uncommon, it is safer to check for variants before catheter insertion. We perform digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of the elbow region before catheter insertion (3 mL of contrast agent from the sheath at 4 mL/s). The SBA branched from the axillary artery in 18.9% of our patients of SBA, the upper 1/3 of the brachial artery in 25.2%, the middle 1/3 in 37.8%, and the lower 1/3 in 12.6% (it could not be identified in 5.5%).
SBA without anastomosis (58.9% of SBAs investigated)
The SBA is of almost the same diameter as the radial artery, so catheter insertion is possible (Figure 7). If the ulnar artery is predominant and the SBA is narrow, then catheter operation may cause vasospasm, so vasodilator (nitroglycerin 0.2–1.0 mg) should be injected before catheter insertion. In so doing, the vasodilator should be mixed with diluted contrast agent and injected while confirming the distribution of the agent.
SBA with an anastomosis, SBA is used (31.3%)
The wire will naturally enter the SBA, but since it is narrower than in the absence of the anastomosis, a vasodilator is often required (Figure 8).
SBA with an anastomosis, anastomosis is used (6.1%)
If the anastomosis is broad and there is no sharp flexion, the catheter can be inserted into the brachial artery via this anastomosis (Figure 9).
SBA with an anastomosis, neither one can be used (3.7%)
If the SBA is narrow and there is sharp flexion of the anastomosis, forming a loop, catheter insertion should be abandoned (Figure 10).
3. Aortic arch
The most frequently encountered anomalies of the aortic arch are aberrant right subclavian artery and right aortic arch.
Aberrant right subclavian artery
This has a reported frequency of 0.5% (Haughton & Rosenbaum1974), the same rate seen in our patients. The right subclavian artery is known to branch off the aortic arch on the left side of the trachea. In TFA, the procedure may conclude without it having been noticed, but in TRA it must be thoroughly understood (Figure 11).
Right aortic arch
The rate was 0.02-0.06% in a report (Haughton & Rosenbaum1974), and 0.11% in our patients. There are three variants: right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery (Figure 12), right aortic arch with mirror-image branching of the arch vessels, and right aortic arch with isolation of the left subclavian artery (Stewart et al.1966). The third one is extremely rare, and 98% of patients with mirror-image branching have cyanotic congenital heart disease (Stewart et al.1966).
We have presented illustrative examples of the obstacles that may be encountered along the route from after radial artery puncture until the catheter reaches the aortic arch during the performance of TRA. TRA can be performed safely if attention is paid to resistance during wire operation, confirmation of the SBA, and aortic arch anomalies.
Adachi BI: Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. In Anatomie der Japaner. Edited by: Band I. Kyoto: Maruzen; 1928:215-325.
Al-Kutoubi A, de Jode M, Gibson M: Radial artery approach for outpatient peripheral arteriography. Clin Radiol 1996, 51: 110-112. 10.1016/S0009-9260(96)80266-2
Cowling MG, Buckenham TM, Belli A-M: The role of transradial diagnostic angiography. Cardovasc Intervent Radiol 1997, 20: 103-06. 10.1007/s002709900115
Haughton VM, Rosenbaum AE: The normal and anomalous aortic arch and brachiocephalic arteries. In Radiology of the skull and brain. Edited by: Newton TH, Potts DG. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1974:1145-1163.
Heenan SD, Buckenham TM, Belli A-M: Transbrachial arteriography: Indications and complications. Cin Radiol 1996, 51: 205-209.
Iwasaki S, Yokoyama K, Takayama K, et al.: The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography. Acta Radiol 2002, 43: 549-555. 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430601.x
Jo KW, Park SM, Kim SD, Kim SR, Baik MW, Kim YW: Is transradial cerebral angiography feasible and safe? A single center’s experience. JKNS 2010, 47: 332-337.
Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ: Percutaneous transradial artery approach for the coronary artery stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993, 30: 173-178. 10.1002/ccd.1810300220
Lippert H, Pabst R: Arterial variations in man. München: J.F.Bergmann Verlag; 1985:71-76.
Matsumoto Y, Hongo K, Toriyama T, Nagashima H, Kobayashi S: Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR 2001, 22: 704-708.
Otaki M: Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Intervent Cardiol 1992, 81: 330-333.
Stewart JR, Kincaid OW, Titus JL: Right aortic arch: Plain film diagnosis and significance. AJR 1966, 97: 377-389. 10.2214/ajr.97.2.377
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
SI researched data and wrote the article. KY, KF, HO, AO, KI, KT, TT and KK helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.