Open Access

Factors associated with compliance to adjuvant hormone therapy in Black and White women with breast cancer

  • Sumita S Bhatta1,
  • Ningqi Hou2,
  • Zakiya N Moton1,
  • Blase N Polite1,
  • Gini F Fleming1,
  • Olufunmilayo I Olopade1,
  • Dezheng Huo2 and
  • Susan Hong1Email author
SpringerPlus20132:356

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-356

Received: 15 July 2013

Accepted: 18 July 2013

Published: 30 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Studies have demonstrated lower rates of breast cancer survival for Black versus White women. Factors implicated include later stages at diagnosis, differences in tumor biology, and lower compliance rates to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT) among Black women with hormone sensitive breast cancer. We examined factors associated with compliance to AHT among Black and White women with invasive breast cancer.

Methods

Women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+), non-metastatic breast cancer were identified by the cancer registry at the University of Chicago Hospital and asked to complete a mail-in survey. Compliance was defined by self-reported adherence to AHT ≥80% at the time of the survey plus medical record verification of persistence (completion of 5 years of AHT). Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with compliance to AHT.

Results

197 (135 White and 62 Black) women were included in the analysis. 97.4% of patients reported adherence to therapy. 87.4% were found to be persistent to therapy. Overall compliance was 87.7% with no statistically significant racial difference seen (87.9% in White and 87.0% in Black, P = 0.87). For both Black and White women, compliance was strongly associated with both perceived importance of AHT (OR =2.1, 95% CI:1.21-3.68, P = 0.009) and the value placed on their doctor’s opinion about the importance of AHT (OR = 4.80, 95% CI: 2.03-11.4, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In our cohort of Black and White women, perceived importance of AHT and the degree to which they valued their doctor’s opinion correlated with overall compliance. This suggests that Black and White women consider similar factors in their decision to take AHT.

Keywords

Medication complianceAdjuvant hormone therapyBreast cancerHealthcare disparities

Introduction

An estimated 75% of breast cancers express estrogen and/or progesterone receptors. For women with these cancers, treatment with five years of adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT), either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to decrease the risk of both breast cancer recurrence and mortality by about a third throughout the first 15 years (Davies et al. 2011). Recent data has shown that continuation of tamoxifen in women with ER + disease for 10 years produces a further reduction in recurrence and can approximately halve breast cancer mortality during the second decade after diagnosis (Davies et al. 2013; Gray et al. 2013). Despite these benefits, studies have demonstrated adherence rates to range from 41% to 72% and non-persistence (discontinuation of therapy before completion of 5 years) to range from 31% to 73%.

Previous studies have identified multiple risk factors for therapy noncompliance including extremes of age (Barron et al. 2007), concomitant antidepressant use (Demissie et al. 2001), lack of social support (Kahn et al. 2007), and side effects experienced (Lash et al. 2006; Murphy et al. 2012). Ethnic and racial variations in medication compliance have also been demonstrated. A number of studies show lower rates of compliance and an increase in mortality among ethnic minorities, particularly Black women (Patridge 2003; Kim et al. 2008; Hershman et al. 2011; Hershman et al. 2009). Studies aimed at improving compliance rates have largely focused on reducing the negative side effects of therapy, however; a number of women do not experience adverse effects and are still noncompliant. Identifying modifiable factors contributing to therapy noncompliance may have significant benefits in improving breast cancer survival.

Models from health psychology have been applied to studies of medication compliance (Kucukarslan 2012). Social cognition models such as the health belief model assumes that individuals develop beliefs that influence the interpretation of information and guide behavior (Horne & Weinman 1999). A number of studies have investigated the impact of perceived benefit of AHT on compliance rates (Barron et al. 2007; Lash et al. 2006; Grunfeld et al. 2005; Fink et al. 2004; Cluze et al. 2012; Kirk & Hudis 2008; Pellegrini et al. 2010; Thewes et al. 2005; Kimmick et al. 2009; Shelton et al. 2013). Grunfeld and colleagues found that adherers were more likely to report a belief in tamoxifen benefit whereas non-adherers were more likely to report no benefit (Grunfeld et al. 2005). In a follow-up study conducted two years after initiation of therapy, Fink and colleagues found that patients’ perceived risk versus benefit of tamoxifen was critical to sustaining adherence after the immediate threat of a breast cancer diagnosis had passed (Fink et al. 2004). Other studies demonstrate a correlation between perceived benefit and future compliance. In a follow-up study of elderly women conducted 5-years after initiation of therapy, Lash and colleagues found that the perceived benefit of therapy assessed at baseline corresponded to future compliance (Lash et al. 2006).

Few studies have examined the association of race with attitudes regarding adjuvant hormone therapy. Shelton and colleagues found significant differences in provider communication, patient involvement in decision making, and medical trust by race of patients (Shelton et al. 2013). However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has specifically assessed whether or not differences in perceived benefit of AHT exists between Black and White women and how this impacts overall compliance rates.

Our study sought to examine factors associated with compliance to AHT in Black and White women with ER + breast cancer at a tertiary urban medical center.

Participants and methods

This research was approved by the University of Chicago institutional review board and patients provided written informed consent for survey participation and retrospective data analysis.

Study sample

Women who had ER + breast cancer were identified by the cancer registry at the University of Chicago. Patients were eligible for this study if they were English speaking, under 80 years of age at initial cancer diagnosis, were no more than 10 years out from their cancer diagnosis, and had been offered hormone therapy [either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane)] as part of their post-surgery treatment. Women with stage IV breast cancer, history of cancer prior to their breast cancer diagnosis, or a known BRCA1/2 germ-line mutation were excluded from the study.

Survey

We designed and implemented a paper survey to assess factors associated with self-reported adherence to AHT. Patients were asked to self-report demographic variables such as race, income, and education. In addition, patients were asked questions about pre-existing chronic health conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, the number of prescription medications taken, whether or not they had insurance coverage for their medications, their total out-of-pocket cost of medications per month, and perceived risk for breast cancer recurrence. The Survey Research Lab at the University of Chicago conducted pretesting of the survey questions to assess both validity and reliability. All eligible patients (N = 381) were contacted by telephone and then mailed the 15 page self- administered survey. Regardless of survey completion, all participants were given a $10 dollar gift card.

To assess adherence, women were asked how often they missed their adjuvant hormone therapy on six categories: 1) never missed a dose; 2) missed no more than 1 dose per month; 3) missed no more than 2 doses per month; 4) missed 1–2 doses per week; 5) missed ≥3 doses per week; and 6) never took the therapy. Regardless of whether or not they chose to start AHT, participants were asked how important they thought AHT was in decreasing their risk for breast cancer recurrence (not important, a little important, moderately important, or very important). Participants were also asked how worried they were about their risk for breast cancer recurrence (very, somewhat, or not worried) and how this compared to their fears at the time of their cancer diagnosis. Other questions included how worried they were about the long-term side effects of taking AHT and concerns about their overall medication costs and the potential for AHT to interfere with their other medicines. In addition, participants were asked how heavily they weighed their doctor’s opinions in their decision to take or not take adjuvant hormone therapy (almost entirely, partly, or not at all).

Measurements

Prior studies using both self- report and pharmacy prescription refill records have used an 80% cut-off to define adherence since <80% adherence has been associated with increased mortality (Kahn et al. 2007; Molfenter et al. 2012; Stavropoulou 2011). Thus we defined adherence in our cohort by self report of taking ≥ 80% of prescribed pills on average per month and patients were considered non-adherent if they missed greater than or equal to 3 doses per week on average (which corresponded to taking therapy less than 80% of the time per month) or if they had not initiated therapy at the time of the survey.

Persistence was defined as completion of 5 years of therapy and was verified by chart review. Chart review documentation in clinic notes from the breast surgeon, radiation oncologist, or medical oncologist were used to assess completion of 5 years of AHT. At the time of chart review, 25 women (12.6%) were in their fourth year of therapy. These women were included as having completed 5 years of AHT. We felt this was appropriate since prior studies have shown that women who have taken most of their therapy are very likely to complete therapy (Molfenter et al. 2012). We also conducted sensitivity analyses by including and then excluding these 25 women and found no difference in either persistence rates or predictors of persistence. Patients with missing data were excluded from the overall analysis.

Compliance was defined as a composite of being both adherent and persistent. Of the women who were found to be persistent, only one patient (0.7%) reported non-adherence. Therefore, our definition of compliance relies heavily on persistence.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata 12.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Demographic characteristics and variables previously mentioned were compared for adherence and compliance rates using a Spearman’s rank correlation or Kruskal-Wallis test. Originally, adherence to hormone therapy was measured as a 6-scale ordinal outcome based on self-report. However, the categories for non-adherence were very small, and thus were combined into one category. We used logistic regression models to evaluate how perceived importance of therapy, concern about breast cancer recurrence, concern about side effects of therapy, and how heavily they valued their doctor’s opinion factored into their decision to adhere and complete therapy. Self- reported race and value placed on their doctor’s opinions were adjusted in the multivariable model to remove confounding effects (Model B) and is considered the full model. Concern about side effects was tested as an additional confounder (Model C) but was not included in the full model. To test if the associations differed by race, we generated an interaction term between race and the variable of interest, and used the Likelihood-ratio test to determine if the interaction was significant.

Results

Patient demographics/characteristics

Of the original 381 women who were asked to participate in the study, 226 (59.3%) completed the survey. Thirteen (6%) were excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria and 15 (7%) were excluded from the analysis because they did not self-report race as either White or Black. Therefore survey data for 197 (87%) women (135 (68.5%) White and 62 (31.5%) Black) were available. Adherence information was available for 192 of the 197 women (5 were excluded due to missing information). Medical records were available for persistence information on 166 out of 197 women. However only 162 women had complete information on both adherence and persistence and thus we were able to assess overall compliance on 162 women.

Patient demographics including age, income, education level and co-morbid conditions are described in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of black and white women

N (%)

White

Black

Total

N = 135

N = 62

N = 197

Age (mean; range)

58.0; 39-72

58.1; 42-73

58.1; 39-73

Education level +

   

  < High school

8 (5.9%)

9 (14.5%)

17 (8.6%)

  High school graduation

52 (38.5%)

33 (53.2%)

85 (43.2%)

  Bachelor’s degree

31 (23.0%)

8 (12.9%)

39 (19.8%)

  Graduate degree

44 (32.6%)

12 (19.4%)

56 (28.4%)

Income +

   

  <60 K

40 (29.6%)

38 (61.3%)

78 (39.6%)

  60 K +

89 (65.9%)

16 (25.8%)

105 (53.3%)

  Unknown

6 (4.4%)

8 (12.9%)

14 (7.1%)

Comorbid Medical Conditions +^

 

  None

52 (38.5%)

11 (17.7%)

63 (32.0%)

  >1 comorbid condition

83 (61.5%)

51 (82.3%)

134 (68.0%)

Insurance coverage +

   

  None

0 (0%)

3 (4.8%)

3 (1.5%)

  Some

33 (24.4%)

8 (12.9%)

41 (20.8%)

  Most

92 (68.2%)

40 (64.5%)

132 (67.0%)

  All

8 (5.9%)

10 (16.3%)

18 (9.1%)

  Unknown

2 (1.5%)

1 (1.6%)

3 (1.5%)

Out of pocket expenses

   

  None

1 (0.7%)

2 (3.2%)

3 (1.5%)

  <$50/month

43 (31.9%)

31 (50.0%)

74 (37.6%)

  $50-100/month

43 (31.9%)

16 (25.8%)

59 (30.0%)

  $100-150/month

25 (18.5%)

5 (8.1%)

30 (15.2%)

  $150-200/month

5 (3.7%)

4 (6.5%)

9 (4.6%)

  $ > $200/month

7 (5.2%)

1 (1.6%)

8 (4.1%)

  Unknown

11 (8.2%)

3 (4.8%)

14 (7.1%)

+P-values < 0.05 by Chi-Square test.

P-values >0.05 by Chi-Square test?

^ Diabetes on medication, hypertension on medication, high cholesterol on medication, kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease.

Overall compliance/adherence

Self-report of medication adherence was high, with 187/192 (97.4%) reporting adherence to therapy (98.5% in White versus 94.9% in Black, p = 0.15). Only 5/192 (2.6%) reported either never starting AHT or missing their doses an average of ≥3 times per week. 87.3%% (145/166) were found to be persistent to therapy on chart review (88.1% in White versus 85.4% in Black, p = 0.63). Overall compliance was 87.7% (142/162) with no statistically significant racial difference seen (87.9% in White and 87.0% in Black, p = 0.87).

Predictors of compliance/adherence

Race and additional demographic characteristics

In univariate analysis shown in Table 2, compliance rates were similar between White and Black women (87.9% vs. 87.0%, P = 0.63). Compared to White women, Black women, had lower education and income levels and more comorbid conditions. Black women, however, had better insurance coverage for prescription medications compared to White women. None of these variables were significantly associated with adherence or compliance (Table 2).
Table 2

Compliance to adjuvant hormone therapy by patient characteristics

 

Total N

Not compliant

Compliant

OR

95% CI

Age in years

     

  39-50

18

1 (5.6%)

17 (94.4%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  51-60

81

12 (14.8%)

69(85.2%)

0.34

0.41-2.78

  61-74

61

7 (11.5%)

54 (88.5%)

0.45

0.05-3.95

Race/Ethnicity

   

  White

116

14 (12.1%)

102 (87.9%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Black

46

6 (13.0%)

40 (87.0%)

0.92

0.33-2.55

Insurance coverage on prescriptions

   

  None

2

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Some

37

5 (13.5%)

32 (86.5%)

0.46

0.05-4.28

  Most

105

14 (13.3%)

91 (86.7%)

1.45

0.06-3.81

  All

15

1 (6.7%)

14 (93.3%)

-

-

Family income

   

  <$60 K

61

5 (8.2%)

56 (91.8%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  $60 K+

91

13 (14.3%)

78 (85.7%)

0.54

0.18-1.59

Education level

   

  < High school

15

1 (6.7%)

14 (93.3%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  High School Graduate

65

7 (10.8%)

58 (89.2%)

0.59

0.07-5.21

  Bachelor’s Degree

33

5(15.2%)

28(84.9%)

0.40

0.04-3.76

  Graduate Degree

49

7 (14.3%)

42 (85.7%)

0.42

0.05-3.79

Comorbid Medical Conditions

   

  None

54

6 (11.1%)

48 (88.9%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  ≥1comorbid conditions

108

14 (13.0%)

94 (87.0%)

0.84

0.30-2.32

Out of pocket expenses

   

  None

1

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

  

  <$50/month

60

8 (13.3%)

52 (86.7%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  $50-100/month

47

6 (12.8%)

41 (87.2%)

1.05

0.34-3.27

  $100-150/month

26

2 (7.7%)

24 (92.3%)

1.84

0.36-9.36

  $150-200/month

8

2(25.0%)

6 (75.0%)

0.46

0.08-2.70

  >$200/month

8

0 (0%)

8 (100%)

-

-

Perceived importance of therapy

   

  Not important

9

4 (44.4%)

5 (55.6%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  A little important

7

3 (42.9%)

4 (57.1%)

1.07

0.14-7.82

  Moderately important

38

5(13.2%)

33 (86.8%)

5.28

1.05-26.6

  Very important

104

7 (6.7%)

97 (93.3%)

11.1

2.42-50.8

Concern about cancer recurrence

   

  Not worried

51

6 (11.8%)

45 (88.2%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Somewhat worried

86

13 (15.1%)

73 (84.9%)

0.75

0.27-2.11

  Very worried

24

1 (4.2%)

23 (95.8%)

0.75

0.35-27.0

Concern about side effects

     

  Not concerned

40

4 (10.0%)

36 (90.0%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Small concerns

50

6 (12.0%)

44 (88.0%)

0.81

0.21-3.11

  Moderate concerns

42

2 (4.8%)

40 (95.2%)

2.22

0.38-12.9

  Big concerns

29

8 (27.6%)

21 (72.4%)

0.29

0.08-1.09

Value placed on doctor’s opinion

     

  Not at all

7

6 (85.7%)

1 (14.3%)

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Partly

23

5 (21.7%)

18 (78.3%)

21.6

2.09-223.7

  Almost entirely

131

9 (6.9%)

122 (93.1%)

81.3

8.81-750.8

Perceived importance of therapy

As shown in Table 3, women who perceived therapy to be “very important” were significantly more compliant than those who perceived therapy to be “not important” (adjusted OR = 9.82, 95% CI:1.75-55.1). For this 4-scale variable, per-unit increase was associated with an OR of 2.11 (95% CI: 1.21-3.68). When examining perception of hormone therapy importance by race, no difference was seen between Black and White women (P-interaction = 0.99). Black women were as likely as White women to perceive AHT as important.
Table 3

Multivariable analysis of compliance by logistic regression

  

 Model A

 

Model B: Full model

  

 Model C

 
 

OR

 95% CI

 P

OR

 95% CI

 P

OR

 95% CI

 P

Perceived importance of therapy

         

  Not important

1.0 (Ref)

 

1.0 (Ref)

 

1.0 (Ref)

 

  A little important

1.00

0.13-7.48

 

3.40

0.17-67.8

 

4.12

0.17-98.9

0.16

  Moderately important

5.91

1.13-30.9

0.003

5.81

0.94-35.9

0.08

5.17

0.74-36.0

 

  Very important

12.6

2.63-60.3

 

9.82

1.75-55.1

 

8.50

1.32-54.7

 

  Per-unit increase

   

2.11

1.21-3.68

0.009

2.18

1.24-3.84

0.007

Race

         

  White

1.0 (Ref)

 

1.0 (Ref)

 

1.0 (Ref)

0.54

  Black

1.72

0.50-5.90

0.39

1.66

0.43-6.35

0.46

1.52

0.40-5.73

 

Value doctor’s opinion

         

  Not at all

   

1.0 (Ref)

 

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Partly

   

13.3

0.88-201.2

0.004

17.9

1.02-315.2

0.007

  Almost entirely

   

45.7

3.54-590.2

 

54.8

3.73-805.9

 

  Per-unit increase

   

4.80

2.01-11.4

<0.001

4.62

1.91-11.2

0.001

Concern about side effects

         

  Not concerned

      

1.0 (Ref)

 

  Small concerns

      

0.78

0.17-3.59

0.55

  Moderate concerns

      

2.29

0.11-2.86

 

  Big concerns

      

0.56

0.11-2.87

 

Compliance/adherence by value of Doctor’s opinion

Value placed on doctor’s opinion was another strong predictor of compliance. As shown in the multivariable analysis in Table 3, women who valued their doctor’s opinion heavily were significantly more compliant than those who did not (adjusted OR = 45.7, 95% CI: 3.54-590.2). Per-unit increase of this 3-scale variable was associated with an OR of 4.80 (95% CI: 2.01-11.4) for compliance.

Discussion

We found that for both Black and White women, perceived importance of AHT in reducing their risk for developing recurrent breast cancer and the degree to which they valued their doctor’s opinion were the most important factors contributing to their overall compliance to therapy. Interestingly, education, income, concerns surrounding medication side effects, and out of pocket expenses did not appear to significantly impact reported rates of either therapy adherence or overall compliance in our cohort. Thus perception of the importance of AHT and enhanced doctor-patient communication may be important modifiable factors that can improve compliance to AHT.

In our study, patients who significantly valued their doctor’s opinions in general were more compliant to therapy. The doctor-patient relationship (Stavropoulou 2011) and doctor-patient communication (Bultman & Svarstad 2000) has been studied extensively in the adherence literature. Studies examining barriers to statin compliance have found communication patterns between patients and their clinical providers influence statin-adherence behaviors (McGinnis et al. 2007) and medical outcomes (Molfenter et al. 2012; Kaplan et al. 1989). Although a recent randomized prospective study examining the influence of educational materials on adherence to aromatase inhibitors found no difference in compliance and persistence between groups that received the educational materials versus those that did not, it is likely that educational materials alone may not be sufficient and a multidisciplinary approach is required (Yu et al. 2012). Further supporting this is a study by Shelton and colleagues which examines doctor-patient communication in patients receiving adjuvant therapy (including chemotherapy) for breast cancer. They found that enhanced provider contact increased compliance rates (Shelton et al. 2013). Thus doctor-patient communication beyond the distribution of educational materials is one possible modifiable mechanism to improve compliance.

One strength of our study is our ability to link chart review with survey responses. We were able to correlate patients’ perceived benefit of AHT and reported adherence rates with eventual completion of AHT as documented by medical records in a cohort study design, which enhances causal inference.

A limitation of our study is the use of a self-reported adherence by survey participants. We recognize that women who participate in surveys differ from those who do not (Font et al. 2012). Although our study results suggest that Black and White survey participants who perceive AHT as important are also more likely to be both adherent and compliant to therapy, it is unclear if this observation holds for nonparticipants.

Contrary to other studies examining compliance to therapy, we found no significant difference in reported adherence or overall compliance rates between Black and White women. Several explanations are possible. Although Black women in our study had lower education levels, lower income levels, and more chronic health conditions, Black women had better insurance coverage for medications compared to White women. Thus Black women who participated in our survey had greater access to medications than White women. Another possible explanation is that our study may have been underpowered. Although we had enough power to detect a greater than 15% difference in compliance rates it is possible that true compliance rates differ by less than 15%.

Given the increase in the number of oral anti-cancer medications, identifying modifiable barriers to the use of oral therapy, especially in minority women, is critical to improving survival. Prospective studies examining factors associated with non-initiation, non-adherence, and early discontinuation of adjuvant hormone therapy are underway with special attention to ethnic minorities (Neugut et al. 2012). Perceived therapy importance and doctor-patient communication on medication compliance represent modifiable variables which can improve overall cancer survival. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago
(2)
Department of Health Studies, University of Chicago

References

  1. Barron TI, Connolly R, Bennett K, et al.: Early discontinuation of tamoxifen: a lesson for oncologists. Cancer 2007, 109: 832-839. 10.1002/cncr.22485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bultman DC, Svarstad BL: Effects of physician communication style on client medication beliefs and adherence with antidepressant treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2000, 40: 173-185. 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00083-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cluze C, Rey D, Huiart L, et al.: Adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen in young women with breast cancer: determinants of interruptions vary over time. Ann Oncol 2012, 23: 882-890. 10.1093/annonc/mdr330View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, et al.: Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: Patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2011, 378: 771-784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al.: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 2013, 381: 805-816. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61963-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Demissie S, Silliman RA, Lash TL: Adjuvant tamoxifen: predictors of use, side effects, and discontinuation in older women. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19: 322-328.Google Scholar
  7. Fink AK, Gurwitz J, Rakowski W, et al.: Patient beliefs and tamoxifen discontinuance in older women with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22: 3309-3315. 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.064View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Font R, Espinas JA, Gil-Gil M, et al.: Prescription refill, patient self-report and physician report in assessing adherence to oral endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study in catalonia, spain. Br J Cancer 2012, 107: 1249-1256. 10.1038/bjc.2012.389View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray RG, Rea D, Handley K, et al.: aTTom: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013., 31: suppl;abstr 5Google Scholar
  10. Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS, Sikka P, et al.: Adherence beliefs among breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 59: 97-102. 10.1016/j.pec.2004.10.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hershman DL, Unger JM, Barlow WE, et al.: Treatment quality and outcomes of African American versus White breast cancer patients: Retrospective analysis of southwest oncology studies s8814/s8897. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27: 2157-2162. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hershman DL, Shao T, Kushi LH, et al.: Early discontinuation and non-adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy are associated with increased mortality in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011, 126: 529-537. 10.1007/s10549-010-1132-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Horne R, Weinman J: Patients’ beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res 1999, 47: 555-567. 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00057-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahn KL, Schneider EC, Malin JL, et al.: Patient centered experiences in breast cancer: predicting long-term adherence to tamoxifen use. Medical Care 2007, 45: 431-439. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257193.10760.7fView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr: Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Medical Care 1989, 27: S110-S127. 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim SH, Ferrante J, Won BR, et al.: Barriers to adequate follow-up during adjuvant therapy may be important factors in the worse outcome for black women after breast cancer treatment. World J Surg Oncol 2008, 6: 26. 10.1186/1477-7819-6-26View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimmick G, Anderson R, Camacho F, et al.: Adjuvant hormonal therapy use among insured, low-income women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27: 3445-3451. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2419View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirk MC, Hudis CA: Insight into barriers against optimal adherence to oral hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2008, 8: 155-161. 10.3816/CBC.2008.n.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kucukarslan SN: A review of published studies of patients’ illness perceptions and medication adherence: lessons learned and future directions. Res Social Adm Pharm 2012, 8: 371-382. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2011.09.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lash TL, Fox MP, Westrup JL, et al.: Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006, 99: 215-220. 10.1007/s10549-006-9193-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. McGinnis B, Olson KL, Magid D, et al.: Factors related to adherence to statin therapy. Ann Pharmacother 2007, 41: 1805-1811. 10.1345/aph.1K209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Molfenter TD, Bhattacharya A, Gustafson DH: The roles of past behavior and health beliefs in predicting medication adherence to a statin regimen. Patient Preference and Adherence 2012, 6: 643-651.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy CC, Bartholomew LK, Carpentier MY, et al.: Adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy among breast cancer survivors in clinical practice: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 134: 459-478. 10.1007/s10549-012-2114-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Neugut AI, Hillyer GC, Kushi LH, et al.: The breast cancer quality of care study (BQUAL): a multi-center study to determine causes for noncompliance with breast cancer adjuvant therapy. Breast J 2012, 18: 203-213. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01240.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Patridge A: Nonadherence to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in women with primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21(4):602-606. 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.071View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pellegrini I, Sarradon-Eck A, Soussan PB, et al.: Women’s Perceptions and experience of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy account for their adherence: breast cancer patients’ point of view. Psychooncology 2010, 19: 472-479. 10.1002/pon.1593View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Shelton RC, Hillyer GC, Hershman DL, et al.: Interpersonal influences and attitudes about adjuvant therapy treatment decisions among non-metastatic breast cancer patients: an examination of differences by age and race/ethnicity in the bqual study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013, 137: 817-828. 10.1007/s10549-012-2370-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Stavropoulou C: Non-adherence to medication and doctor-patient relationship: evidence from a european survey. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 83: 7-13. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Thewes B, Meiser B, Duric VM, et al.: What survival benefits do premenopausal patients with early breast cancer need to make endocrine therapy worthwhile? Lancet Oncol 2005, 6: 581-588. 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70254-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu KD, Zhou Y, Liu GY, et al.: A prospective, multicenter, controlled, observational study to evaluate the efficacy of a patient support program in improving patients’ persistence to adjuvant aromatase inhibitor medication for postmenopausal, early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 134: 307-313. 10.1007/s10549-012-2059-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bhatta et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.