Computed tomographic lymphography for sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer: report of two cases
© Hashimoto et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 20 June 2013
Accepted: 26 July 2013
Published: 29 July 2013
Male breast cancer is rare, accounting for less than 1% of breast cancers. Because of its rarity evidence of the usefulness sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for male breast cancer has not been established. Moreover, a navigation system which can easily determine the incision site of SLNB is needed because a second incision for SLNB is necessary in most cases. We report successful computed tomographic lymphography (CTLG)-guided SLNB in two male breast cancer cases: the first patient was a 79-year-old man and the second was a 64-year-old man. Both had presented with a lump behind the nipple. Clinical diagnoses were early breast carcinoma in both cases. The second patient took tamoxifen 20 mg daily as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. SLNs were clearly visualized by CTLG, allowing mastectomies with SLNB to be performed. Both SLNB were negative, such that axillary lymph node dissection was not needed. Preoperative CTLG is useful for visualizing lymph flow and detecting SLN in male breast cancer.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a common procedure for breast cancer patients. The SLN concept was developed based on the finding that carcinoma cells draining into lymphatic vessels first reach specific (sentinel) lymph nodes. According to this theory, it is possible to avoid axillary lymph node dissection if SLNs are properly identified and thereby reduce the risk of postoperative complications, such as edema and numbness of the arm, is reduced (Kurosumi and Takei, 2007).
In SLNB, numerous methods for the injection of a radioisotope (RI) and/or blue dye have been reported, including peritumoral, intratumoral, subcutaneous, intradermal, and subareolar injections (Schwartz et al., 2002). However, these methods present certain disadvantages and potential pitfalls regarding SLN mapping. On the other hand, several studies on the application of indirect lymphography to obtain images of the lymphatic vessels and nodes were reported in the 1980s. Among them, Suga et al. identified SLN by three-dimensional multidetector-row computed tomographic lymphography (3D MDCT-LG) using a nonionic contrast medium (Suga et al., 2003). This technique may compensate for the disadvantages of the scintigraphic and blue dye-staining methods because clear visualization of the direct connection between the SLN and its afferent lymphatic vessels can be obtained on detailed cross-sectional anatomical images. Despite several papers to date having been published on computed tomographic lymphography (CTLG) in women, there have been no reported studies on men. Male breast cancer is a rare disease, accounting for <1% of all breast cancers and <1% of all annual cancer deaths in men (Fentiman et al., 2006). Because of the low number of affected patients, treatment for breast cancer in men has been extrapolated from treatment protocols for breast cancer in women (Gentilini et al., 2007). Since the incision for SLNB is necessarily separate from the primary surgery in men, a navigation system which can easily detect the incision site in the axillary region is required.
We identified the SLN in two male breast cancer cases employing CTLG and a dye-guided method and evaluated the usefulness of CTLG for SLNB in male breast cancer patients.
On the day before surgery, CTLG was performed to identify SLNs using a 64-detector row CT scanner. The patient was placed in the half side-lying position with the arms positioned in the cranial direction, essentially the same positioning as for surgery. To determine the vertical location of the SLN, a hand-made grid, consisting of 15 cm long angiographic catheters positioned at intervals of 1 cm and fixed together with adhesive tape, was placed on the lateral aspect of the anterior chest wall.
Under general anesthesia, 3 mL of indigocarmine were injected into the tumor side of the periareolar skin, followed by massage for 30 seconds. A 2 cm incision was made at the site marked with oil ink and the SLN was traced based on the lymphatic vessels dyed in blue. The removed sentinel nodes were immediately submitted to frozen section. After SLNB, total mastectomy was performed. Intraoperative pathological diagnosis showed no lymph node metastases, and axillary lymph node dissection was therefore deemed to be unnecessary. SLNs were fixed in formalin and pathologically examined. Thick tissue sections (2 mm in thickness) were cut from a paraffin block of SLNs. These sections were then stained with hematoxylin-eosin or immunostained with monoclonal antibody to cytokeratin.
Invasive ductal carcinoma was demonstrated pathologically. The tumor was histological grade 1, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, progesterone receptor (PR) positive, with a HER2 score of 0, and the Ki67 index was 15%. The SLNs showed no metastasis. Pathologically. The final diagnosis was pT1N0M0 Stage I. Hormone receptors were positive, and he received tamoxifen after surgery. The patient has experienced no recurrence, to date, for 3 years since surgery.
Preoperative CTLG provides important information about the status of SLNs in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The relations among tumors, lymph-vessels, and SLNs can be assessed together with the surrounding anatomy. Guided by CTLG imaging findings, SLNB can easily be performed as a minimally invasive procedure. SLNB for breast carcinoma was introduced in the mid-1990s, and has already been performed on thousands of patients with breast carcinoma. Nevertheless, many unanswered questions remain (Schwartz et al., 2002). One of the problems to be solved is the lack of methods for identifying the full set of SLNs draining the primary tumor. As one possible solution to this problem, lymphangiography using an oil-in-water emulsion of contrast medium has been employed to assess the stages of malignancies. However, several complications have hampered widespread adoption of this method (Sato et al., 2007; Tangoku et al., 2004). Another possibility is CTLG, which allows visualization of the anatomy and provides functional data about lymphatic flow after interstitial injection of commercially available and commonly used intravenous contrast agents designed to enhance CT images. This method is simple, inexpensive and safe, such that CTLG has been performed in various fields, including video-assisted breast surgery (Yamashita and Shimizu, 2008), as well as in breast cancer patients requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Ue et al., 2007) and patients with gastrointestinal malignancies (Tangoku et al., 2007). CTLG is technically easy to perform and the data acquisition time is short (Ue et al., 2007). In addition, CTLG can be performed at any institution equipped with a multi-detector row CT scanner.
In women, breast surgery is often performed using a lateral skin incision on the lateral mammary fold. This lateral skin incision saves the integrity of the skin blood supply, allows for a complete breast gland removal, and has benefits in terms of body image for women as no scars are apparent in the frontal view. Axillary clearance and/or SLNB can be easily performed via such a lateral skin incision (Regolo et al., 2008). On the other hand, the standard treatment for localized breast cancer in men is a modified radical or simple mastectomy including resection of the nipple since up to a third of men with breast cancer have stage III disease due to the small amount of breast tissue (Fentiman et al., 2006). For advanced male breast cancer, axillary dissection is usually performed via the same incision. However, in clinically node-negative cases, SLNB will probably become standard practice in the future. Another incision will thus be needed for SLNB in most cases. CTLG allows the detection of the sites of the SLNs preoperatively. Thus, the axillary region incision site can easily be determined, thereby shortening the operation.
CTLG will make SLNB in men with early-stage N0 breast cancer more practical, because CTLG has already become a standard method for women in many medical centers. Frequently, breast cancer is diagnosed in men at an advanced stage, making SLNB inappropriate, but a considerable proportion of patients still present with a clinically negative axilla, thereby making them candidates for a less invasive method of axillary staging (Gentilini et al., 2007). In addition, although the data were limited, a panel of the American Society of Clinical Oncology stated that SLNB would be unlikely to be any less accurate in men than in women, and that treatment of male breast cancer has paralleled that of female breast cancer (Lyman et al., 2005). The safety and usefulness of SLNB have also been reported for male patients. Thus far several papers have described SLNB in men, documenting detection rates of 100% and no false negatives in patients who received a back-up axillary clearance (Gentilini et al., 2007; Boughey et al., 2006; Cimmino et al., 2004; De Cicco et al., 2004; Flynn et al., 2008; Goyal et al., 2004; Kitada et al., 2011; Koukouras et al., 2012; Rusby et al., 2006). These findings support the reliability and reproducibility of SLNB as a technique applicable to male breast cancer patients.
In the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial, axillary lymph node dissection did not significantly affect overall or disease-free survival of patients with clinical T1-T2 breast cancer and a positive SLN who were treated with lumpectomy, adjuvant systemic therapy, and tangential-field whole-breast radiation therapy (Giuliano et al., 2011). More effective systemic therapy would presumably influence excellent local and distant outcomes, even if the regional nodes obtained by SLNB harbored metastases associated with a higher risk for systemic disease. A relatively large series of men with breast carcinoma suggested that men benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy for breast carcinoma, with the greatest benefit being that adjuvant hormonal therapy (Giordano et al., 2005; Ribeiro and Swindell, 1992). In our two cases, adjuvant endocrine therapy using tamoxifen was performed, and the second patient also received neoadjuvant endocrine therapy due to work-related issues. In men, CTLG has the potential to enhance the usefulness SLNB by reducing the complications associated with axillary lymph node dissection and improving quality of life with no reduction in survival duration.
In conclusion, CTLG allowed accurate SLN localization by providing rapid and adequate visualization of the direct connection between the SLN and its afferent lymphatic vessels. Detailed cross-sectional images of lymphatic anatomy during CT resulted in successful SLNB based on clear detection of the incision site. CTLG is especially valuable for identifying lymphatic drainage and the locations of SLNs in male breast cancer.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.
- Boughey JC, Bedrosian I, Meric-Bernstam F, Ross MI, Kuerer HM, Akins JS, et al.: Comparative analysis of sentinel lymph node operation in male and female breast cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006, 203: 475-480. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cimmino VM, Degnim AC, Sabel MS, Diehl KM, Newman LA, Chang AE: Efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2004, 86: 74-77. 10.1002/jso.20045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Cicco C, Baio SM, Veronesi P, Trifiro G, Ciprian A, Vento A, et al.: Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2004, 25: 139-143. 10.1097/00006231-200402000-00008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fentiman IS, Fourquet A, Hortobagyi GN: Male breast cancer. Lancet 2006, 367: 595-604. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68226-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flynn LW, Park J, Patil SM, Cody HS 3rd, Port ER: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is successful and accurate in male breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2008, 206: 616-621. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentilini O, Chagas E, Zurrida S, Intra M, De Cicco C, Gatti G, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male patients with early breast cancer. Oncologist 2007, 12: 512-515. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-512View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giordano SH, Perkins GH, Broglio K, Garcia SG, Middleton LP, Buzdar AU, et al.: Adjuvant systemic therapy for male breast carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 104: 2359-2364. 10.1002/cncr.21526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, et al.: Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011, 305: 569-575. 10.1001/jama.2011.90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goyal A, Horgan K, Kissin M, Yiangou C, Sibbering M, Lansdown M, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30: 480-483. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.02.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kitada M, Ozawa K, Sato K, Hayashi S, Sasajima T: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma: report of two cases. Surg Today 2011, 41: 837-840. 10.1007/s00595-010-4366-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koukouras D, Spyropoulos C, Zygomalas A, Tzoracoleftherakis E: Sentinel node biopsy in male breast carcinoma: is the "female" approach justified? Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2012, 33: 255-256.Google Scholar
- Kurosumi M, Takei H: Significance and problems of histopathological examination and utility of real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction method for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2007, 14: 342-349. 10.2325/jbcs.14.342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al.: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 7703-7720. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Regolo L, Ballardini B, Gallarotti E, Scoccia E, Zanini V: Nipple sparing mastectomy: an innovative skin incision for an alternative approach. Breast 2008, 17: 8-11. 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.040View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro G, Swindell R: Adjuvant tamoxifen for male breast cancer (MBC). Br J Cancer 1992, 65: 252-254. 10.1038/bjc.1992.50View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rusby JE, Smith BL, Dominguez FJ, Golshan M: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in men with breast cancer: a report of 31 consecutive procedures and review of the literature. Clin Breast Cancer 2006, 7: 406-410. 10.3816/CBC.2006.n.058View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sato K, Shigenaga R, Ueda S, Shigekawa T, Krag DN: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2007, 96: 322-329. 10.1002/jso.20866View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U: Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 2002, 94: 2542-2551. 10.1002/cncr.10539View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Suga K, Ogasawara N, Okada M, Matsunaga N: Interstitial CT lymphography-guided localization of breast sentinel lymph node: preliminary results. Surgery 2003, 133: 170-179. 10.1067/msy.2003.17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tangoku A, Yamamoto S, Suga K, Ueda K, Nagashima Y, Hida M, et al.: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using computed tomography-lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Surgery 2004, 135: 258-265. 10.1016/j.surg.2003.07.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tangoku A, Seike J, Nakano K, Nagao T, Honda J, Yoshida T, et al.: Current status of sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in breast and gastrointestinal tract. J Med Invest 2007, 54: 1-18. 10.2152/jmi.54.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ue H, Ogawa Y, Kariya S, Nakatani K, Tsuzuki K, Miyatake K, et al.: Sentinel lymph node detection using computed tomography lymphography is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Oncol Rep 2007, 17: 1475-1480.Google Scholar
- Yamashita K, Shimizu K: Video-assisted breast surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by three-dimensional computed tomographic lymphography. Surg Endosc 2008, 22: 392-397. 10.1007/s00464-007-9407-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.