Assessment of genetic diversity and distribution of endophytic fungal communities of Alternaria solani isolates associated with the dominant Karanja plants in Sanganer Region of Rajasthan
Higher plants are ubiquitously colonized with fungal endophytes that often lack readily detectable structures. Current study examines the distribution of endophytic fungal communities within Karanja plants and diversity of novel fungal endophyte Alternaria solani isolates collected from different locations of Sanganer region of Rajasthan. Results confirmed that A. solani is a major fungal endophyte consortium associated with Karanja plants. PCR Amplified fragments using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers were subjected to unweighted pair group method analysis (UPGMA), which clearly distinguished twelve ecologically diverse A. solani isolates. A total of 58 RAPD loci were amplified, out of which 35 (60.34%) were polymorphic and 23 were monomorphic (39.66%) in nature. These polymorphic loci were identified with an average of 2.92 bands per primer. The efficacy of RAPD markers proved as an efficient marker system with respect to detection of polymorphism and number of loci scored and can be used for the identification of a particular isolates, thereby defining core collections and strengthening their exploitation in acquiring novel products produced by them.
Scarcity of natural resources is one of the major issues for the developing countries. Environmental degradation, loss of biodiversity and spoilage of land provide positive contribution to the above. Insufficiency of fuel is a big problem for the burgeoning human population in the world. To overcome this hitch, people are looking for some innovative alternatives. In the last few years, biofuel is emerging as a potent fuel alternate to overcome the fuel scarcity (Strobel & Daisy 2003). For a truly renewable source, crops or other similar agricultural sources would have to be considered.
Rajasthan is one of the twenty five hot spots of global biodiversity and offers most suitable climate for the growth of diverse group of plants. Pongamia pinnata L. commonly known as Karanja (Family- Leguminaceae) is one of the important plant of high commercial value. It has been recognized as a major biodiesel producer in India (Tiwari et al. 2010). The tree attains a height of 7–10 meter. The plant is mainly valued for their seeds which contain 30-40% oil. This plant accommodates a large number of fungal endophytes (Saikkonen et al. 2004). It has recently surged that the xerophytic conditions of Sanganer region of Rajasthan accommodate a large number of fungal endophytes (Lucero et al. 2006), which led to a considerable amount of research regarding the role of these fungi in host plants (Frohlich et al. 2000Strobel 2003; Tan & Zou , Tan & Zou Tan & Zou 2001Tejesvi et al. 2007Zou et al. 2000).
Endophytes, microorganisms that reside in the tissues of living plants are relatively unstudied and potential sources of novel natural products for exploitation in medicine, agriculture and industry (Schulz et al. 2002). It is noteworthy that, of the nearly 300,000 plant species that exist on the earth, each individual plant is host to one or more endophytes. Fungal endophytes with the potential of biofuel production/bioactive compounds can be harvested from these plants. This fact alone helps in the elimination of the problem of biofuel scarcity. Due to extraordinary role of these fungi in ecosystem, it is necessary to explore them at morphological, ecological and molecular level.
It seems obvious that endophytes are a rich and reliable source of genetic diversity. Characterization of genetic diversity is a prerequisite for efficient conservation and utilization of genetic resources. Conventionally, fungal species have been characterized based on morphological characteristics. During the last few decades, several PCR based molecular marker techniques such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Saikkonen et al. 2004), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) (Zietkiewicz et al. 1994), simple sequence repeat (SSR) (Litt & Luty 1989), Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Botstein et al. 1980), Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Vos et al. 1995) etc. have been developed and establish wide application in the assessment of genetic diversity (Haugland et al. 2004; Sette et al. 2006).
Among them, RAPD markers have caught the fancy of many individuals in the field of applied fungal taxonomy due to their low cost and easy to handle (Guo et al. 2001; &2003Hawsksworth 1991Williams et al. 1990). These markers are amplification products of anonymous sequences using single, short and arbitrary oligonucleotide primers (8–10 bp). DNA sequence difference between individuals in a primer-binding site may results in the failure of the primer to bind and hence in the absence of a particular band among amplification products. RAPD markers provide a quick and efficient screening of DNA sequence as they require small amount of DNA, involve non-radioactive assay, need a simple experimental set-up, do not require species specific probe libraries or hybridization step.
In the present study, assessment of genetic diversity among fungal endophytes is a vital part because it explores the endophytic association, distribution and host specificity between P. pinnata and novel fungal endophytes. This study will help in resolving genetic relationship among different isolates and can be used for selection of desired isolate for domestication.
Materials and methods
Site description
The samples were collected from 12 different regions of Sanganer (Table 1, Figure 1). These sites were almost similar with respect to their climatic conditions and provide optimum growth conditions to the plant P. pinnata (Figure 2A).
Figure 1
Map of Sanganer region of Rajasthan shaded portion showing sampling sites.
Figure 2
Methodology of endophytic fungal isolation from Karanja plants. (A) Mature plant of Pongamia pinnata L. (B) Sporulating fungal endophytes from nodal explants. (C) Pure culture of A. solani growing on PDA media. (D) Conidial development of A. solani. (E) Mature conidia of A. solani with cross and longitudinal septa.
Table 1
Details ofAlternaria solaniisolates collected from various sites of Sanganer region
Accession number
Collection site
1
Khonagorion
2
Muhana
3
Jagatpura
4
Goner
5
Powlia
6
Watika
7
Kalwara
8
Neola
9
Bagru
10
Rampura
11
Bassi
12
Chaksu
Sample collection
Plants samples (P. pinnata) from the entire twelve sites of Sanganer region, especially those with an unusual biology and possessing novel strategies for survival were selected for the study (Strobel & Daisy 2003). The samples were collected in sterilized polythene bags, during the month of July- November.
Isolation of fungal endophytes
The leaves, nodes and internodes were used as explants for isolation of fungal endophytes (Figure 2B). All explants were surface-sterilized by dipping in 75% ethanol for 1 minute, 4% sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes followed by rinsing three times in sterilized double distilled water (Frohlich et al. 2000). In each Petri dish (9 cm diameter), a total of four-five processed explants were evenly spaced onto the surface of Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) media supplemented with 200 μg/ml tetracycline. Cultures were incubated at 28°C and observation was recorded regularly. The sporulating mycelia of fungi appeared on the plates were carefully isolated, sub-cultured and pure culture were maintained (Nagamani et al. 2006) (Figure 2C).
Identification of fungal endophytes
The isolated fungal endophytes were identified on the basis of morphological features like colony characterization, growth on different media, color of colony (front and reserve), conidial development, size, shape and attachment of conidia (Nagamani et al. 2006). Then the fungus was grown in a slide culture by which the pores of the fungus remain undisturbed and attached to the sporophores thus facilitating in identification (Anthony & Walkes 1962). This technique was performed for the examination of various stages of conidia formation and proper identification of the sporulating fungi (Promputtha et al. 2005). The microscopic identification of fungal endophytes was carried out by lacto phenol cotton blue staining method (Nagamani et al. 2006) (Figure 2D-E).
Frequency distribution and colonization rate
Data analysis was carried out on the basis of Colonization rate (%) of fungal endophytes which was equal to the number of segments colonized by a single endophyte divided by the total number of segments observed X 100 (Raviraja 2005Raviraja et al. 2006).
Molecular analysis
Assessment of genetic diversity among 12 fungal isolates of A. solani isolated from different ecological niche were carried out using PCR based RAPD primers.
Isolation of DNA
The fungal DNA was isolated as per the standardized protocol (Guo et al. 2003 & 2004).
Purification of DNA samples using RNase treatment
The isolated DNA sample was raised up to 400 μl with TE buffer. Two μl of RNase A (10 mg/ml) was added, mixed by inversion and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. DNA was precipitated using 50 μl of 4 M ammonium acetate and 950 μl of pre chilled ethanol. The content was mixed gently by inversion and spin at 10, 000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was dried by inverting the tube on the paper towel for 15 minutes. DNA pellet was dissolved in 40 μl of TE buffer and stored at 4°C.
RAPD primers
Fifty RAPD primers were initially screened for the PCR amplification of the genomic DNA isolated from the A. solani. Out of which 12 primers gave good amplification in terms of number of bands and reproducibility (Table 2).
Table 2
Primer-wise score of PCR amplification products scored in the 12 isolates ofAlternaria solani
Primer
Number of PCR amplification fragments generated
Monomorphic bands
Polymorphic bands
GCC-4
5
3
GCC-7
7
2
GCC-14
2
1
GCC-16
5
4
GCC-19
3
5
GCC-20
6
2
GCC-24
4
3
GCC-47
8
3
GCC-49
6
2
GCC-74
5
4
GCC-89
3
4
GCC-91
4
2
PCR amplification conditions
Each 25 μl reaction mixture contained 12.5 μl of 2 X PCR buffer, 2 μl each of dATP, dGTP, dTTP and dCTP, 1U Taq DNA polymerase, 25 pmol random decamer primer and 50 ng of genomic DNA for PCR amplification.
Data analysis
Amplification products were scored from the gel images as presence or absence of bands. Each band was treated as one marker. Homology of bands was based on the distance of migration of amplified DNA fragments according to their molecular weights in the gel. The presence of band 0percentage of the total number of bands produced in fingerprinting profiles. Cluster analysis for the genetic distance was then carried out using UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method Analysis) clustering method (Crous et al. 2006Tedersoo et al. 2006). The genetic distances obtained from cluster analysis through UPGMA were used to construct the dendrogram, depicting the relationships of the clones using computer program NTSYS pc version 2.02 (Rohlf 1997).
Results
Maximum number of fungal endophytes were isolated from nodal explants of P. pinnata (CF=91.5%) as compared to leafy explants (CF=76.5%) and internodal explants (CF=67.5%) (Figure 3). A total of 8 different endophytic fungal genera were isolated from nodal explants. Among these eight isolates, A. solani showed highest occurrence (40.85%) followed by Fusarium oxysporum (15.95%) and Colletotrichum gleospoirioides (14.39%). In contrast, Curvularia lunata (9.72%), Helminthosporium papulosum (9.33%), Aspergillus flavus (6.61%), Phomopsis viticola (2.33%) and Cladosporium cladosporioides (0.77%) were showed low frequency of colonization (Figure 4). The difference in endophyte assemblages from various tissues indicated that some individual dominant endophytic fungal taxa have an affinity for different tissue types and this might reflect their potential for utilizing a specific substrate in connection with the location of the plant sample (Arnold & Lutzoni 2007Ganley et al. 2004).
Figure 3
The colonization frequency (CF) of fungal endophytes in explants (node, leaf and internode) ofPongamia pinnataL.
Since, A. solani showed dominant endophytic association as compared to other endophytic fungal communities. A total of 12 different A. solani isolates were collected from different regions of Sanganer (Rajasthan) and further investigated for their genetic diversity in nature. These isolates were amplified using 50 random decamer primers to ascertain the level of genetic diversity among them. Of the 50 primers screened, 12 primers produced reproducible results. A total of 58 RAPD loci were amplified from different isolates. Most of the PCR products were in size range of 100–2000 bp with 4.83 bands per RAPD primer. Of the 58 bands scored 35 (60.34%) were found to be polymorphic (either occurring in or absent in less than 95% of all isolates) and 23 (39.66%) were found to be monomorphic in nature (Table 3). A total of 35 polymorphic loci were identified with an average of 2.92 bands per primer. The frequencies of polymorphic bands obtained varied from primer to primer. Wide genetic variation between isolates of the species was evident from the high number of polymorphic marker and unique bands, even though small number of isolates available (Figure 5).
Figure 5
RAPD profile of twelve isolates ofAlternaria solaniamplified using RAPD primer GCC-19.
Table 3
Distribution of amplified fragments inAlternaria solaniisolates*
Parameters
Values
Total number of primers screened
50
Number of primers showed amplification
18
Number of primers producing polymorphism
12
Total number of loci scored
58
Total number of polymorphic loci
35
Size of amplified bands
100-2000 bp
Average number of bands per primer
4.83
Average number of polymorphic bands per primer
2.92
% bands which are polymorphic
60.34
*Data pooled from studies on 12 isolates of Alternaria solani.
Data obtained from RAPD analysis alienated 12 isolates into 3 large cluster groups (Figure 6). The first group is further divided into 2 subgroups (A & B). Sub group A has 2 isolates (As1 and As12) whereas, subgroup B contain 8 isolates (As2, As4, As5, As7, As9, As11, As6 and As8). Group second and third contain only one isolate As3 and As10, respectively.
Figure 6
Dendrogram showing UPGMA clustering of 12 isolates ofA.solani.
Discussion
The mechanism through which endophytes exists and respond to their surrounding must be better understood in order to be more predictive about which higher plants to seek and spend time in isolating microfloral compounds. This may facilitate the product discovery processes. Certainly, one of the major problems facing the future of endophyte biology and natural-product discovery is the rapid diminishment of rainforests, which holds the greatest possible resource for acquiring novel microorganisms and their products.
Endophytic fungal communities from different habitats are indeed different: communities associated with Sanganer region of Rajasthan are poorly investigated group of microorganisms that represents an abundant and dependable source of bioactive and chemically novel compounds with potential for exploitation in a wide variety of medical, agriculture and industrial arenas (Strobel & Daisy 2003). Endophytes belonging to potentially pathogenic species were also isolated. Hence, it would appear that certain fungal species, which are notoriously pathogenic in certain plant types, might behave as endophytes in others, thereby not inducing disease symptoms. In the above investigation, the most frequently isolated endophytic fungal species was A. solani, dominantly associated with the Karanja plants.
These molecular markers can demonstrate similarities and dissimilarities between different isolates of same species even when a morphological description is severely limited. Among them, RAPD despite having certain disadvantages (dominant nature and stringent optimization of assay), can produce multilocus profiles, widely spanning the genome even in the absence of any prior genetic/sequence information. Present study provides a molecular profile based on RAPD marker, which can be used for the identification of a particular A. solani isolate, thereby defining their core collection and strengthening their exploitation in acquiring novel products produced by them.
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory, Jaipur National University
References
Anthony EH, Walkes AC: An improvement in slide culture technique. Can J Microbiol 1962, 8: 929-930. 10.1139/m62-121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Arnold AE, Lutzoni F: Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes : are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots. Ecology 2007, 88: 541-549. 10.1890/05-1459View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW: Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 1980, 32: 314-333.Google Scholar
Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Mansilla JP, Alfenas AC, Groenewald JZ: Phylogenetic reassessment of Mycosphaerella spp. and their anamorphs occurring on Eucalyptus II. Stud Mycol 2006, 55: 99-131. 10.3114/sim.55.1.99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Frohlich J, Hyde KD, Petrini O: Endophytic fungi associated with palms. Mycological Res 2000, 104: 1202-1212. 10.1017/S095375620000263XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ganley RJ, Burunsfeld SJ, Newcombe G: A community of unknown, endophytic fungi in western white pine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101: 107-112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Guo LD, Huang GR, Wang Y, He WH, Zheng WH, Hyde KD: Molecular identification of white morphotype strains of endophytic fungi from Pinus tabulaeformis . Mycological Res 2003, 107: 680-688. 10.1017/S0953756203007834View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Guo LD, Hyde KD, Liew ECY: Detection and taxonomic placement of endophytic fungi within frond tissues of Livistona chinesis based on rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2001, 20: 1-13. 10.1006/mpev.2001.0942View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Guo LD, Xu L, Zheng WH, Hyde KD: Genetic variation of Alternaria alternata , an endophytic fungus isolated from Pinus tabulaeformis as determined by random amplified microsatellites (RAMS). Fungal Divers 2004, 16: 53-65.Google Scholar
Haugland RA, Varma M, Wymer LJ, Vesper SJ: Quantitative, PCR analysis of selected Aspergillus Penicillium and Paecilomyces species. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004, 27: 198-210. 10.1078/072320204322881826View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hawksworth DL: The fungal dimension of biodiversity magnitude, significance and conservation. Mycological Res 1991, 95: 641-655. 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80810-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Litt M, Luty JA: A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Amr J Hum Genet 1989, 44: 397-401.Google Scholar
Lucero ME, Barrow JR, Osuna P, Reyes I: Plant–fungal interactions in arid and semiarid ecosystems: large scale impacts from microscale processes. J Arid Environ 2006, 65: 276-284. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.08.014View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Nagamani A, Kunwar IK, Manoharachary C: A Hand Book of Soil Fungi. New Delhi: I K international; 2006.Google Scholar
Promputtha I, Jeewon R, Lumyong S, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD: Ribosomal DNA fingerprinting in the identification of non sporulating endophytes from Magnolia liliifera (Magnoliaceae). Fungal Diversity 2005, 20: 167-186.Google Scholar
Raviraja NS: Fungal endophytes in five medicinal plant species from Kudremukh Ranga, Western Ghats of India. J Basic Microbiol 2005, 45: 230-235. 10.1002/jobm.200410514View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Raviraja NS, Maria GL, Sridhar KR: Antimicrobial evaluation of endophytic fungi inhabiting medicinal plants of the Western Ghats of India. Life Science 2006, 6: 515-520. 10.1002/elsc.200620145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rohlf F: NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.0 Exeter Software. Setauket, New York: Applied Biostatics Inc; 1997.Google Scholar
Schulz B, Boyle C, Draeger S, Rommert AK, Krohn K: Endophytic fungi: a source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites. Mycol Res 2002, 106: 996-1004. 10.1017/S0953756202006342View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sette LD, Passarini MRZ, Delarmelina C, Salati F, Duarte MCT: Molecular characterization and antimicrobial activity of endophytic fungi from coffee plants. World J Microbial Biotechnol 2006, 22: 1185-1195. 10.1007/s11274-006-9160-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Strobel G, Daisy B: Bioprospecting for Microbial Endophytes and Their Natural Products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2003, 67: 491-502. 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.491-502.2003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Strobel GA: Endophytes as sources of bioactive products. Microbes and Infection 2003, 5: 535-544. 10.1016/S1286-4579(03)00073-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tan RX, Zou WX: Endophytes a rich source of functional metabolites. Natural Product Reports 2001, 18: 448-459. 10.1039/b100918oView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Larsson E, Kõljalg U: Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycol Res 2006, 110: 734-748. 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.04.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Tejesvi MV, Kini KR, Prakash HS, Subbiah V, Shetty HS: Genetic diversity and antifungal activity of species of Pestalotiopsis isolated as endophytes from medicinal plants. Fungal Divers 2007, 24: 37-54.Google Scholar
Tiwari A, Mahajan CS, Mishra DK, Shukla K, Porwal P: Comparative in vitro antioxidant activity of Pongamia pinnata linn. Leaves extracts and Isolated compound. Inter J Pharm Biol Arch 2010, 1: 69-75.Google Scholar
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 1995, 23: 4407-4414. 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalaski JA, Tingey SV: DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers is useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res 1990, 18: 6531-6535. 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zou WX, Meng JC, Lu H, Chen GX, Shi GX, Zhang TY, Tan RX: Metabolites of Colletotrichum gloeosporidies and endophytic fungus in Artemisia mongolica . J Nat Prod 2000, 63: 1529-1530. 10.1021/np000204tView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
