Ecotypic variation for seed dormancy, longevity and germination requirements in wild/weedy Sorghum bicolor in Ethiopia: implications for seed mediated transgene dispersal and persistence
© Adugna; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 1 March 2013
Accepted: 24 May 2013
Published: 30 May 2013
Seed dispersal is one of the vehicles of gene flow in plants. If a seed carrying transgene(s) is dispersed into the environment, the fate can be determined by its persistence in the soil bank, which can also vary in different ecotypes of a species and the physical environment of the soil including temperature and moisture. This study aimed at investigating ecotypic differences in wild sorghum for dormancy and longevity and their response to varying levels of temperature and moisture for seed germination to aid efforts to predict the potential risk of transgene flow via seeds and persistence in the soil. Wild sorghum seed was collected from different geographical regions in Ethiopia and buried for a maximum of 24 months in the soil. In a separate study, three levels of constant temperature and five levels of osmotic potential (Ψs) were used to investigate variation in wild sorghum ecotypes for seed germination. Viability of buried seeds declined over time, but the rate of decline differed among ecotypes. Better seed longevity was observed at 20 cm soil depth than 10 cm in two wild sorghum ecotypes. Crop seeds depleted within the first six months regardless of the burial depth whereas on the average 1.24% viability was observed in wild sorghum seed after 24 months of burial in the soil. Ecotypic differences were also evident in response to varying temperature and Ψs. Therefore, dispersed seeds carrying crop genes (including transgenes) could persist in the soil for considerable period of time, which may have implications for transgene flow and persistence.
One of the central features of seed dormancy is to maintain a reservoir of soil seed bank for future re-establishment following unfavorable conditions (Monaghan1979). Dormancy is one of the major mechanisms by which weeds in agricultural fields invade and persist (Narwal et al2008). Sorghum seeds exhibit dormancy at harvest (Gaber et al1974), but after ripening is known to improve germination in the majority of wild sorghum species by breaking this dormancy (Sastry et al2006). Moreover, treatment with 0.5% and 1% nitric acid (KNO3) was found to improve germination up to 44% in wild sorghum (Shanmugavalli et al2007). On the other hand, with no dormancy, sorghum seeds stored in ordinary seed packets under dry and high temperature can remain viable up to 12 years (Karper and Jones1937). An important aspect frequently overlooked in studies of seed dormancy is the possibility that the seed dormancy strategies differ among ecotypes (Bennett1999). So far, no study has assessed whether wild/weedy sorghum has been able to evolve differences in their seed dormancy and longevity patterns enabling adaptation to particular environments in its center of origin, yet such knowledge may be useful to understand the weediness potential of different wild sorghum populations and also to design effective management methods. Moreover, environmental factors affecting germination, particularly whether or not exposures to high soil temperatures or soil moisture regimes are required for germination have not been determined. In Ethiopia, the range of environments where wild/weedy sorghum exists is wide. It is, thus, likely that wild sorghum in different environments have adapted differently in their response to different seed germination requirements at that site.
Weed seeds buried in the soil have been concern to agriculturalists (Omami et al.1999) because soil seed banks constitute a key component of plant population dynamics, community structure and annual life-cycles influencing population size within and between years. Seed banks can serve as pools of genetic material, enabling a range of responses to environmental variability, and can buffer populations against temporarily extreme adverse conditions (Teo-Sherrell et al.1996). Seed-bank persistence between years also allows plants to average their success over time, by reducing both opportunity and risk (Cohen1966). Seed characteristics such as longevity and dormancy enable populations to survive for several years (Baker1974). This property of seeds can vary among ecotypes of a species (Monaghan1979) and are dependent on the environment because they are highly responsive to environmental conditions and may strongly influence the evolution of post-germination life-history characters beyond their role in reducing risk (Donohue2002). Soil temperature is known to strongly influence both percentage and time of germination of sorghum seed (e.g., Kanemasu et al.1975). Moreover, the response of wild sorghum seed to varying osmotic potential and temperature could perhaps be helpful to build hydro-thermal models (e.g., Bradford2002; Rowse and Finch-Savage2003) to predicting seed germination.
Reports of studies in different species and ecotypes showed variable results for persistence of seeds in the soil. The duration of loss of viability in buried seeds may range from days in the seeds of the composites (Marks and Nwachuku1986) to nearly 20 years in American dragonhead, common lambs quarters, Pennsylvania smartweed, and shepherd’s-purse (Conn et al.2006). In between reports vary with species and depth of burial. Narwal et al. (2008) found total loss of viability of ryegrass seeds after 16 months of burial at five and 10 cm depth in different soil and simulated rainfall conditions. Noldin et al. (2006) compared the seed longevity of several ecotypes of wild rice from four US states and found <1% viable seeds in three ecotypes at 5 cm depth, but nine ecotypes had similar proportion of viable seeds at a depth of 25 cm after two years of burial at two locations in Texas, but within each depth there was minor variation among ecotypes. Burnside et al. (1977) also reported that Nebraska farmers noticed wild sorghum (shatter cane) plants 8 years after the field had been planted with Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.).
Although both pollen and seed are the two major vehicles of gene flow, they are basically related to each other as volunteer seeds can grow and contribute to pollen mediated gene flow (Nielson et al.2009). Spatial seed dispersal by natural means is often considered to be low because most crops have lost their ability for independent seed dispersal (De Wet and Harlan1975). However, seed dispersal can be aided by animals, water, wind, humans via agricultural implements, seed marketing, application of cattle manure, etc. This dispersal can be an important step in the dynamics of crop-wild gene exchange (Jenczewski et al.2003). The initial level of seed dormancy, longevity and the response of seed germination with respect to environmental flux can influence the potential temporal dispersal of transgenes (Linder and Schmitt1994). If gene dispersal is known to have occurred via seed, the next step is to study the persistence and further establishment (Jenczewski et al.2003). The role of soil seed bank dynamics in seed mediated gene flow is quite substantial (Nielson et al.2009) as soil seed banks are the reservoirs of genetic material upon which natural selection can act (Simpson et al.1989). Therefore, studying this dynamics is crucial for risk assessment of transgene flow.
Dormancy distributes seed germination in time and space and promotes survival (Li and Foley1997). Thus, the study of seed dormancy and longevity is useful because it is a fundamental element for determining seed bank dynamics (Van Mourik et al.2005). As a result, characterization of the germination ecology of ecotypes would help to indicate their potential to become noxious weeds in different systems of cultivation (Buckley et al.2004). Therefore, knowledge of seed longevity and dormancy can help weed management (Martinez-Ghersa et al.1997). On the other hand, studies related to ecotypic variation in wild plants are considered to be essential for conservation of biodiversity (Crandall et al.2000) in order to avoid extinction associated with environmental change (Fraser and Fraser2000). In addition, populations of the same species that grow in different locations may show local adaptation to site conditions. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were 1) to assess ecotypic variation for dormancy and longevity of buried wild/weedy sorghum seeds, 2) to assess ecotypic variation in the response of wild sorghum seeds collected from different geographical regions in Ethiopia to different temperature and moisture regimes, and 3) to predict the potential risk of seed mediated transgene dispersal and persistence to aid efforts to conserve wild sorghum genetic resources.
Materials and methods
Effect of burial time and depth on seed longevity of different ecotypes of wild sorghum
This study consisted of two experiments:
Geographical characteristics of the wild sorghum collection sites
Name of location
Kara Kurkura/ Gerbi
In this part of the study, seed from three to four plants from each of the two wild sorghum populations collected from Mandura and Ghibe in November, 2009 was bulked. Moreover, one cultivated sorghum variety, WSV 387 was included. The treatments were arranged in a factorial experiment in RCBD with three replications. The three factors were two burial depths (10 cm and 20 cm), three populations (two wild and a cultivar) and three exhumation dates (6, 12, and 18 months after burial). Therefore, 54 bags were buried on 26 April 2010 and 18 bags were exhumed every six months (on 25 September 2010, 16 March 2011, and 3 November 2011) for viability test.
For both experiments, double layered permeable nylon mesh bags of size 15 cm × 35 cm were prepared for seed burial to create the natural soil environment. In many of the earlier studies (e.g., Omami et al.1999; Narwal et al.2008) a large number of seeds mixed with soils were placed in small bags, usually 10 cm × 10 cm. However, high seed density in the mesh bags may influence seed mortality because of elevation of pathogen levels as it is higher than the natural density in the soil bank (Van Mourik, et al.2005). In this experiment a more ideal proportion of soil to seed mixture was used as suggested by Teo-Sherrell et al. (1996). Accordingly, 50 seeds from the intended samples were mixed with 500 g of sieved soil in the mesh bag. The soil was collected at Melkassa Agricultural Research Center where the species was not grown for more than three years. Paper labels sealed in polythene bags were placed in each mesh bag for identification of samples during exhumation. In order to prevent loss of seeds from the bags and to avoid entrance of soils and other species weed seeds, the bags were tightly fastened and buried in horizontal position. The bags were buried with their colored strings extended to the outside of the soil for easy detection of the bags during exhumation as suggested by Van (2005). They were buried 50 cm apart from one another in a grid. The field was previously used for conducting other crop experiments and has been extensively disturbed. However, during the duration of the experiment it was kept undisturbed (no cultivation).
After each exhume, the seeds were sorted from the soil with 2 mm sieve and graded based on their physical appearance and strength. During the first exhume in both experiments, the seeds that germinated in the field were found with their intact dead plumule and radicle tissues. Moreover, some seeds died in the field as evidenced by their brown endosperm and the easiness with which they crushed when minimum force was applied to them. However, starting from the second exhume it was difficult to identify those seeds, which germinated in the field as the dried tissues decomposed. The stiff seeds were washed and kept in germination boxes and soaked in 2% Clorox for 5 minutes in order to sterilize them and rinsed twice with distilled water. The seeds were then placed in new 11 cm × 11 cm × 3.5 cm germination boxes on blotters wetted with distilled water. The germination boxes were placed in incubator adjusted at 30°C temperature, which was selected based on calibration. The germinated seeds were counted and removed starting from the third day for two weeks. Later, the non germinated seeds were tested for viability by dissecting and soaking them in 1% Tetrazolium chloride (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride) solution for 6–8 hours at 35°C in an incubator. Seeds that were fully or >2/3 stained (red) were considered viable. Therefore, the whole data in each set was classified in to three groups: germinated in lab (germinable), dormant and dead. The dormant seeds group included those seeds which didn’t germinate during lab germination test, but were found viable using TTC test. The dead group included seeds those germinated and/or decayed in the field and those found intact but confirmed dead after TTC test. All of the proportions (percentage) of the viability measures were estimated based on the original 50 seeds. Data on mean monthly soil temperature at 10 cm and 20 cm depth and rainfall measurements were recorded at a meteorological weather station of the research center located about 200 meters from the experimental plot.
Response of wild sorghum ecotypes to differential osmotic potential and temperature regimes
Where, Ψs = osmotic potential in Mega Pascal (MPa), C = PEG concentration, T = Temperature. The minus sign indicates that dissolved PEG reduces the water potential of a solution relative to the reference state of pure water (Tazi and Zeiger2003).
The wild sorghum genotypes (ecotypes) used in the study were grown at Melkassa Agricultural Research Center during the 2010 main rainy season under the same management and harvested in November of the same year. The seeds were kept in the laboratory at room temperature (25 ± 3°C) until the beginning of the experiment. The genotypes were selected based on their representation to three different agro ecologies and by their high rate of germination (≥88%). In order to avoid mechanical seed dormancy, the glumes were removed from the seeds before the experiment using fine sandpaper. Twenty-five seeds from each of the three wild sorghum genotypes in each replication were placed in 115 mm Petri dishes on top of Whatman® number one filter paper. To avoid decay of seeds by fungi, seeds were treated with Apron Star®. Five milliliter of each PEG solution was applied to each Petri dish and the Petri dishes were sealed with a two inch wide Para film® to avoid evaporation. The Petri dishes were randomly placed in each of the two upper compartments of a WTC binder 78532 incubator (Tuttlingen/ Germany) in the dark. In order to avoid breakage of the Para film, one liter of distilled water was kept in a 5 liter beaker at the bottom compartment of the incubator to raise the humidity.
Data recording and statistical analysis
Fate of wild sorghum seed after 18 and 24 months of burial in the soil
General Linear Model (GLM) ANOVA showed significant difference (p < 0.05) for the Genotype × Duration of burial interaction (Additional file1), which indicates that genotypes (ecotypes) collected from different geographical regions showed differential response on seed viability (longevity) to the different periods of burial. Some of them showed drastic decline in viability or total germination in just a few months, others showed relatively slower, but ultimately, most of the seeds were depleted within the 24 months of burial period.
Survival of buried seeds (experiment-2) from five populations (ecotypes) of wild sorghum after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, based on pooled data from 20 mesh bags per population
Mean percent of viable seeds
Percent germinated seeds in lab (non-dormant)
Percent TTC viable seeds (dormant)
Percent intact but dead seeds (TTC non-viable)
Percent germinated/decomposed in field
Excavated after 6 months of burial
Exhumed after 12 months of burial
Exhumed after 18 months of burial
Exhumed after 24 months of burial
Percent of viable seeds, the rate of decline and the time it takes for 50% of wild and cultivated sorghum seeds to lose viability (half-life) after 0.5, 1 and 1.5 years of burial in the soil
Duration of burial, t (years)
10 cm depth
20 cm depth
Average viable seeds (%)
Rate of decline (r)
Average viable seeds (%)
Rate of decline (r)
Response of wild sorghum ecotypes for varying moisture and temperature regimes
Effect of burial time and depth on seed germination of wild and cultivated sorghum genotypes
The result of the present study on the fate of wild sorghum seed after 18 and 24 months of burial was in agreement with the results of Jacques et al. (1974) who did similar study in Kansas. They found that only few seeds of cultivated sorghum remained viable after four months of burial regardless of the burial depth, but some shatter cane seeds were able to survive for three years mostly from deeper burial depths (30 cm to 38 cm). The result was also intermediate between the results of Burnside et al. (1996) and Teo-Sherrell and Mortensen (2000). Burnside et al. (1996) found little viability in weedy sorghum seed after five years of burial, but they also observed 1% germinated after 17 years of burial in eastern Nebraska. Teo-Sherrell and Mortensen (2000) reported more than 80% mortality in weedy sorghum seed within three months after burial (between November and March) in Nebraska because of winter cold. However, such kind of winter environment of the temperate regions does not exist in most sorghum growing regions of Sub-Sahara Africa including Ethiopia. The observation that an increase in depth of burial increases longevity was in agreement with the previous reports in sorghum (Jacques et al.1974), crimson and red clovers (Rampton and Ching1970), in jointed goat grass (Donald and Zimdahl1987), in wild oat (Miller and Nalewaja1990), and in Amaranthus retroflexus seeds (Omami et al.1999), to mention a few. This may be due mainly to the unavailability of suitable conditions for germination such as a decrease in oxygen content with increase in depth. In addition, seeds near the surface of the soil are more liable to natural predators and greater fluctuation in environmental conditions, which may contribute to faster rate of decay (Chantre et al.2008).
The fact that differences for viability associated with dormancy were highly significant only for genotype factor may indicate that dormancy is mainly a characteristic of the plant (genotype). It could be largely influenced by the physiological and genetic makeup within the seed. Dormancy is known to be controlled by many genes (Li and Foley1997). Similarly, Dunbabin and Cocks (1999) reported large differences in the seed dormancy pattern of two ecotypes of cape weed (Arctotheca calendula) in Western Australia. The two wild sorghum populations showed increased viability at the two depths of burial differently after a year, but both of them showed decline in viability thereafter (Table 3). This may be due to the dormancy-non-dormancy cycle as observed in other plant species (e.g., Baskin and Baskin1988). In general, crop seeds totally germinated or died within the first 6 months regardless of the depth of burial. The difference in longevity between the crop and the wild seeds in the present study could be attributed to different reasons. First, it may be due to conditions of the seed that are inherent. Secondly, it may be related to differences in their initial level of dormancy. The wild sorghum seeds from Ghibe and from Pawe had 35% and 45% dormancy, respectively before burial whereas the cultivated sorghum had near complete germination (94%) (Data not shown). This much dormancy in the wild was observed after five months of storage in the laboratory at room temperature (after ripening) as seed dormancy is related to longevity (e.g., Jurado and Flores2005). The third reason could be due to mechanical dormancy as a result of seed covering by glumes. This behavior of wild sorghum seeds was also observed in earlier studies and degluming was found to improve germination (Sastry et al.2006). Similar observation was also reported in wild rice (Gu et al.2003).
Soil temperature at Melkassa seemed to have less effect to bring about variation in dormancy among the different exhumation periods as the trend was more or less similar during the duration of burial (Additional file4). However, the rainfall distribution might have considerable effect (Additional file5). After burial of bags for experiment-2 in April 2010, there was high rainfall; even the highest rainfall during the duration of burial was in July-August of the same year, which might have contributed to the depletion of crop seeds by germination within the first 6 months of burial.
Response of wild sorghum ecotypes for varying osmotic potential and temperature regimes
Populations of wild sorghum collected from different geographical regions (ecotypes) were found to show some level of variation in their germination requirements. Accordingly, with no osmotic stress, Aradom population showed the highest mean germination (98%) at 15°C whereas at 23°C and 30°C, Mandura population showed the highest mean germination (100% and 96%, respectively) (Figure 3). The germination of Gerbi population was the lowest at all temperature levels. Despite their differences, the seeds of all ecotypes did not germinate at 15°C when Ψs was < −0.6 MPa and at 23°C when Ψs was < −0.9 MPa. Smith and Hoveland (1986) also found 44% reduction in germination of cultivated sorghum seed when Ψs decreased from 0 to −1.0 MPa. In agreement with this study, Smith et al. (1989) observed no germination at 15°C and at Ψs of −1.2 MPa in cultivated sorghum and in pearl millet. Similarly, Lippai et al. (1996) studied the response of Horehound seed at different temperature and osmotic potential and found increased germination for each degree increase in temperature but decreased with decreased Ψs and ceased at −1.5 MPa. The superior germination observed in Aradom population over the other two populations at the highest temperature (30°C) with mild moisture stress (Ψs = −0.6 MPa) might be because this wild population is adapted to the dry lowlands characterized by high temperature and drought stress conditions. The observed better germination in Aradom population at −0.3 MPa of Ψs than the control at 30°C may indicate that some level of moisture stress is helpful to enhance seed germination for wild sorghum that are adapted to the dry lowlands. Perhaps this is among the reasons why wild sorghum is predominantly distributed in the lower altitude, moisture stressed areas of Ethiopia than in the highlands (Adugna and Bekele2013a).
Implications for seed mediated transgene dispersal and persistence
The authors have been trying to follow various modalities to investigate the risk of crop-wild gene flow and beyond (Adugna and Bekele2013a2013b; Adugna et al.2013a2013b). The present study was intended to estimate the length of time the wild and crop sorghum seeds can persist in the soil and their germination ecology to give inference of probable survival and persistence of transgenes. It was found that sorghum crop seeds depleted in just a few months, but wild sorghum seeds survived for considerable period of time in the soil bank perhaps because crops might have lost their seed longevity and persistence mechanisms with domestication and breeding. This may also mean that when there is no human interference, crop genes can only escape to the environment and survive via the seeds of their wild relatives as they can freely interbreed. As the resulting hybrids do not show reduced fitness (Adugna and Bekele2013b), the escaped genes can spread into the environment with no barrier. Therefore, crop genes (including transgenes) have high probability of persistence in the wild once pollen mediated gene flow has occurred between the two and provided the germination requirements are not fulfilled, which calls for effective management of wild seed movement. Moreover, because wild sorghum could serve as reservoirs of valuable genes for future crop improvement, it is important to conserve the observed ecotypic diversity.
This study was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biodiversity Interface (BBI) program of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to Professor Allison A. Snow, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. I thank Professors Allison A. Snow and Endashaw Bekele, Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University for the general supervision during the study. My thanks extend to Mr. Mohammed Salah, at MARC for his technical support during preparation of PEG 6000 solution.
- Adugna A, Bekele E: Geographical distribution and phenotypic diversity in wild sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.)] in Ethiopia: implications for germplasm conservation and crop-wild flow. Plant Genet Resour 2013a, 11: 68-76. 10.1017/S1479262112000391View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adugna A, Bekele E: Morphology and fitness components of wild × crop F1 hybrids of Sorghum bicolor (L.) in Ethiopia: Implications for survival and introgression of crop genes in the wild pool. Plant Genet Resour 2013b. 10.1017/S1479262113000129Google Scholar
- Adugna A, Snow AA, Sweeney PM, Bekele E, Mutegi E: Population genetic structure of in situ wild Sorghum bicolor in its Ethiopian center of origin based on SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2013a, 60: 1313-1328. 10.1007/s10722-012-9921-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adugna A, Sweeney PM, Bekele E: Estimation of in situ mating systems in wild sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.)] in Ethiopia using SSR based progeny array data: implications for the spread of crop genes into the wild. J Genet 2013b., 92(1): 10.1007/s12041-013-0214-6Google Scholar
- Baker HG: The evolution of weeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1974, 5: 1-24. 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baskin CC, Baskin JM: Germination ecophysiology of herbaceous plant species in a temperate region. Am J Bot 1988, 75: 286-305. 10.2307/2443896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bennett SJ: Ecotypic variation between and within two populations of Trifolium tomentosum (woolly clover) from Syria and Western Australia: its success as a colonizing species. Aust J Agric Res 1999, 50: 1443-1450. 10.1071/AR99024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradford KJ: Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modelling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci 2002, 50: 248-260. 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0248:AOHTTQ]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buckley YM, Ree M, Paynter Q, Lonsdale M: Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia. J Appl Ecol 2004, 41: 547-560. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00909.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burnside OC, Wicks GA, Fenster CR: Longevity of shatter cane seed in soil across Nebraska. Weed Res 1977, 17: 139-143. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1977.tb00457.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burnside OC, Wilson RG, Weisberg S, Hubbard KG: Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in Eastern and Western Nebraska. Weed Sci 1996, 44: 74-86.Google Scholar
- Chantre GR, Sabbatini MR, Orioli GA: Effect of burial depth and soil water regime on the fate of Lithospermum arvense seeds in relation to burial time. Weed Res 2008, 49: 81-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cohen D: Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 1966, 12: 119-129. 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90188-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conn JS, Beattie KL, Blanchard A: Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 19.7 years of burial in Alaska. Weed Sci 2006, 54: 464-470. 10.1614/WS-05-161R.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne K: Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 2000, 15: 290-295. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01876-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Wet JMJ, Harlan JR: Weeds and domesticates: Evolution in the man-made habitat. Econ Bot 1975, 29: 99-107. 10.1007/BF02863309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Donald WW, Zimdahl RL: Persistence, germ inability and distribution of jointed goat grass ( Aegilops cylindrical ) seed in soil. Weed Sci 1987, 35: 149-154.Google Scholar
- Donohue K: Germination timing influences natural selection on life-history characters in Arabidopsis thaliana . Ecol 2002, 83: 1006-1016. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1006:GTINSO]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dunbabin MT, Cocks PS: Ecotypic variation for seed dormancy contributes to the success of cape weed ( Arctotheca calendula ) in Western Australia. Aust J Agric Res 1999, 50: 1451-1458. 10.1071/AR99001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fraser DF: Species at the edge: the case for listing of “peripheral” species. In At Risk. Proceedings of a Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk. Vol. 1, 15–19 February 1999, University College of the Cariboo, Kamloops, Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks, Victoria, BC Edited by: Darling LM. 2000, 49-53.Google Scholar
- Gaber SD, Abdalla FH, Mahdy MT: Treatments affecting dormancy in sweet sorghum seed. Seed Sci Tech 1974, 2: 306-316.Google Scholar
- Gu X, Chen Z, Foley ME: Inheritance of seed dormancy in weedy rice. Crop Sci 2003, 43: 835-843. 10.2135/cropsci2003.0835View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacques GL, Vesecky F, Feltner KC, Vanderlip RL: Effects of depth and duration of burial on shatter cane seed. Crop Sci 1974, 14: 787-789. 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400060003xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jenczewski E, Ronfort J, Chèvre AM: Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes. Env Bios Res 2003, 2: 9-24. 10.1051/ebr:2003001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jurado E, Flores J: Is seed dormancy under environmental control or bound to plant traits? J Veget Sci 2005, 16: 559-564. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02396.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanemasu ET, Bark DL, Chin Choy E: Effect of soil temperature on sorghum emergence. Pl Soil 1975, 43: 411-417. 10.1007/BF01928503View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karper RE, Jones DL: longevity and viability of sorghum seed. Agron J 1937, 28: 330-331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li B, Foley ME: Genetic and molecular control of seed dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 1997, 2: 384-389. 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)90053-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linder CR, Schmitt J: Assessing the risks of transgene escape through time and crop-wild hybrid persistence. Mol Ecol 1994, 3: 23-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lippai A, Smith PA, Price TV, Weiss J, Lloyd CJ: Effects of temperature and water potential on germination of horehound ( Marrubium vulgare ) seeds from two Australian localities. Weed Sci 1996, 44: 91-99.Google Scholar
- Marks MK, Nwachuku AC: Seed-bank characteristics in a group of tropical weeds. Weed Res 1986, 26: 151-157. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1986.tb00690.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Ghersa MA, Satorre EH, Ghersa CM: Effect of soil water content and temperature on dormancy breaking and germination of three weeds. Weed Res 1997, 45: 791-797.Google Scholar
- Michel BE, Kaufmann MR: The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Pl Phys 1973, 51: 914-916. 10.1104/pp.51.5.914View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller SD, Nalewaja JD: Influence of burial depth on wild oats ( Avena fatua ) seed longevity. Weed Tech 1990, 4: 514-517.Google Scholar
- Monaghan N: The biology of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) . Weed Res 1979, 19: 261-267. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1979.tb01536.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Narwal S, Sindel BM, Jessop RS: Dormancy and longevity of annual ryegrass ( Lolium rigidum ) as affected by soil type, depth, rainfall, and duration of burial. Pl Soil 2008, 310: 225-234. 10.1007/s11104-008-9649-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielson RL, McPherson MA, O’Donovan JT, Harker KN, Yang R, Hall LM: Seed-mediated gene flow in wheat: seed bank longevity in western Canada. Weed Sci 2009, 57: 124-132. 10.1614/WS-08-099.1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noldin JA, Chandler JM, McCauley GN: Seed longevity of red rice ecotypes buried in soil. Pl Danin, Viçosa-MG 2006, 24: 611-620.Google Scholar
- Omami E, Haigh AM, Medd RW, Nicol HI: Changes in germ inability, dormancy and viability of Amaranthus retroflexus as affected by depth and duration of burial. Weed Res 1999, 39: 345-354. 10.1046/j.1365-3180.1999.00149.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rampton HH, Ching TM: Persistence of crop seeds in soil. Agron J 1970, 62: 272-277. 10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200020029xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rowse H, Finch-Savage W: Hydrothermal threshold models can describe the germination response of carrot ( Daucus carota ) and onion ( Allium cepa ) seed populations across both sub- and supra-optimal temperatures. New Phyt 2003, 158: 101-108. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00707.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sastry DVSSR, Upadhyaya HD, Gowda CLL: Degluming, storage and testing periods influence seed germination of wild sorghum germplasm. J SAT Agric Res 2006, 2: 1-4. http://ejournal.icrisat.org/cropimprovement/v2i1/v2i1degluming.pdf Google Scholar
- Shanmugavalli M, Renganayaki PR, Menaka C: Seed dormancy and germination improvement treatments in fodder sorghum. J SAT Agric Res 2007, 3(1):1-3. (PR%20Renganayaki%20et%20al.).pdf http://ejournal.icrisat.org/mpii/v3i1/Sorgu_Millet%20_other_Cereals/ISMN%2016_Seed%20dormancy...%20 Google Scholar
- Simpson RL, Leck MA, Parker VT: Seed banks: general concepts and methodological issues. In Ecology of soil seed banks. Edited by: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL. San Diego: Academic; 1989:3-8.Google Scholar
- Smith RL, Hoveland CS: Effects of temperature and water stress on seed germination and seeding depth on emergence of pearl millet and sorghum. ASA, Madison: Agronomy abstracts; 1986:94.Google Scholar
- Smith RL, Hoveland CS, Hanna WW: Water stress and temperature in relation to seed germination of pearl millet and sorghum. Agron J 1989, 81: 303-305. 10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100020032xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tazi L, Zeiger E: Plant physiology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2003.Google Scholar
- Teo-Sherrell CPA, Mortensen DA: Fates of buried Sorghum bicolor ssp. drummondii seed. Weed Sci 2000, 48: 549-554. 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0549:FOBSBS]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Teo-Sherrell CPA, Mortensen DA, Keaton ME: Fates of weed seeds in soil: a seeded core method of study. J Appl Ecol 1996, 33: 1107-1113. 10.2307/2404690View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van TK: Seed longevity of Melaleuca quinquenervia : A burial experiment in South Florida. J Aqua Pl Manag 2005, 43: 39-42.Google Scholar
- Van Mourik TA, Stomph TJ, Murdoch AJ: Why high seed densities within buried mesh bags may overestimate depletion rates of soil seed banks. J Appl Ecol 2005, 42: 299-305. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01016.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.