Solving Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation by using Picard method

Shadan Sadigh Behzadi

doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-108

Impact Factor 0.982

Research

Open Access

Solving Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation by using Picard method

Shadan Sadigh Behzadi¹Email author

SpringerPlus20132:108

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-108

Received: 21 July 2012

Accepted: 27 September 2012

Published: 13 March 2013

Abstract

In this paper, Picard method is proposed to solve the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation with fuzzy initial condition under generalized H-differentiability. The existence and uniqueness of the solution and convergence of the proposed method are proved in details. Some examples are investigated to verify convergence results and to illustrate the efficiently of the method. Also, we obtain the switching points in examples.

Keywords

Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation; Fuzzy number; Fuzzy-valued function; h-difference; Generalized differentiability; Picard method

Introduction

As we know the fuzzy differential equations FDE are one of the important part of the fuzzy analysis theory that play major role in numerical analysis. For example, population models (Guo et al. 2003), the golden mean (Datta 2003), quantum optics and gravity (El Naschie 2005), control chaotic systems (Feng and Chen 2005; Jiang 2005), medicine (Abbod et al. 2001; Barro and Marin, 2002). Recently, some mathematicians have studied FDE (Abbasbandy and Allahviranloo 2000; Abbasbandy et al. 2004; Abbasbandy et al. 2005; Allahviranloo et al. 2007; Bede 2008; Bede and Gal 2005; Bede et al. 2007; Buckley and Feuring 2000; Buckley and Jowers 2006; Buckley et al. 2002; Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores 2006; Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores et al. 2007; Chapko and Johansson 2012; Chen and Ho 1999; Cho and Lan 2007; Congxin and Shiji 1993; Diamond 1999; Diamond 2002; Ding et al. 1997; Dubois 1982; Dou and Hon 2012; Fard 2009a; Fard and Bidgoli b; Fard and Bidgoli 2010; Fard and Kamyad 2011; Fard et al. 2009; Fei 2007; Jang et al. 2000; Jowers et al. 2007; Kaleva 1987, 1990, 2006; Lopez 2008; Ma et al. 1999; Mizukoshi et al. 2007; Oberguggenberger and Pittschmann 1999; Papaschinopoulos 2007; Puri and Ralescu 1983; Seikkala 1987; Solaymani Fard and Ghal-Eh 2011; Song et al. 2000). The fuzzy partial differential equations FPDE are very important in mathematical models of physical, chemical, biological, economics and other fields. Some mathematicians have studied solution of FPDE by numerical methods (Afshar Kermani and Saburi 2007; Allahviranloo 2002; Barkhordari Ahmadi and Kiani 2011; Buckley and Feuring 1999; Chen et al. 2009; Farajzadeh et al. 2010; Moghadam and Jalal 2011; Rouhparvar et al. 2010; Verma et al. 2009). In this work, we present the Picard method to solve the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation as follows:

\begin{array}{l} {\tilde{u}}_{t} (x, t) = {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t) + \tilde{u} (x, t), & 0 \leq t \leq T, \\ a \leq x \leq b, a, b, T \in R . \end{array}

(1)

With fuzzy initial condition:

\tilde{u} (x, 0) = \tilde{f} (x) .

(2)

The structure of this paper is organized as follows: In section “Basic concepts”, some basic notations and definitions in fuzzy calculus are brought. In section “Description of the method”, Eqs.(1,2) are solved by Picard method. The existence and uniqueness of the solution and convergence of the proposed method are proved in section “Existence and convergence analysis” respectively. Finally, in section “Numerical examples”, the accuracy of method by solving some numerical examples are illustrated and a brief conclusion is given in section “Conclusion”.

Figure 1
**The results of Example 5.1 for (** $\underline{u}$ ( x **, 0.6, 0.1),** $\bar{u}$ **(x, 0.6, 0.1)).**

Basic concepts

Here basic definitions of a fuzzy number are given as follows, (Allahviramloo 2005; Dubois and Prade 2005; Kauffman and Gupta 1991;Nguyen 1978;Zadeh 1965)

Definition 2.1

An arbitrary fuzzy number

\tilde{u}

in the parametric form is represented by an ordered pair of functions

(\underline{u}, \bar{u})

which satisfy the following requirements:

(i)

$\bar{u} : r ? \underline{u} (r) ? R$ is a bounded left-continuous non-decreasing function over [0,1],
(ii)

$\underline{u} : r ? \bar{u} (r) ? R$ is a bounded left-continuous non-increasing function over [0,1],
(iii)

$\underline{u} (r) = \bar{u} (r), 0 = r = 1 .$

Definition 2.2

For arbitrary fuzzy numbers

ũ, \tilde{v} \in E^{1}

, we use the distance (Hausdorff metric) (Goetschel and Voxman 1986)

D (u (r), v (r)) = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} | \underline{u} (r) - \underline{v} (r) |, sup | \bar{u} (r) - \bar{v} (r) |},

and it is shown (Puri and Ralescu 1986) that (E ¹, D) is a complete metric space and the following properties are well known:

\begin{array}{l} D (\tilde{u} + \tilde{w}, \tilde{v} + \tilde{w}) = D (\tilde{u}, \tilde{v}), \forall \tilde{u}, \tilde{v} \in E^{1}, \\ D (k \tilde{u}, k \tilde{v}) = ∣ k ∣ D (\tilde{u}, \tilde{v}), \forall k \in R, \tilde{u}, \tilde{v} \in E^{1}, \\ D (\tilde{u} + \tilde{v}, \tilde{w} + \tilde{e}) \leq D (\tilde{u}, \tilde{w}) + D (\tilde{v}, \tilde{e}), \forall \tilde{u}, \tilde{v}, \tilde{w}, \tilde{e} \in E^{1} . \end{array}

Definition 2.3

Consider $\tilde{x}$ , $\tilde{y} \in E$ . If there exists $\tilde{z} \in E$ such that $\tilde{x} = \tilde{y} + \tilde{z}$ then $\tilde{z}$ is called the H- difference of $\tilde{x}$ and $\tilde{y}$ , and is denoted by $\tilde{x} ⊖ \tilde{y}$ (Bede and Gal 2005).

Proposition 1

If $\tilde{f} : (a, b) \to E$ is a continuous fuzzy-valued function then $g (x) = \int_{a}^{x} f (t) dt$ is differentiable, with derivative $g^{'} (x) = f (x)$ (Bede and Gal 2005).

Definition 2.4

(see (Bede and Gal 2005)) Let

\tilde{f} : (a, b) \to E

and x ₀ ∈ (a, b). We say that

\tilde{f}

is generalized differentiable at x ₀ (Bede-Gal differentiability), if there exists an element

f^{'} (x_{0}) \in E

, such that:

i)

for all h > 0 sufficiently small, ∃ f(x ₀ + h) ⊖ f(x ₀), ∃ f(x ₀) ⊖ f(x ₀ − h) and the following limits hold:
$\begin{align} \begin{array}{l} lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0} + h) ⊖ f (x_{0})}{h} & = lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0}) ⊖ f (x_{0} - h)}{h} \\ = f^{'} (x_{0}) \end{array} \end{align}$

or
ii)

for all h >V0 sufficiently small, ∃ f(x ₀) ⊖ f(x ₀ + h), ∃ f(x ₀ − h) ⊖ f(x ₀) and the following limits hold:
$\begin{align} \begin{array}{l} lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0}) ⊖ f (x_{0} + h)}{- h} & = lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0} - h) ⊖ f (x_{0})}{- h} \\ = f^{'} (x_{0}) \end{array} \end{align}$

or
iii)

for all h>0 sufficiently small, ∃ f(x ₀ + h) ⊖ f(x ₀), ∃ f(x ₀ − h) ⊖ f(x ₀) and the following limits hold:
$\begin{align} \begin{array}{l} lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0} + h) ⊖ f (x_{0})}{h} & = lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0} - h) ⊖ f (x_{0})}{- h} \\ = f^{'} (x_{0}) \end{array} \end{align}$

or
iv)

for all h > 0 sufficiently small, ∃ f(x ₀) ⊖ f(x ₀ + h), ∃ f(x ₀) ⊖ f(x ₀ − h) and the following limits hold:
$\begin{align} \begin{array}{l} lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0}) ⊖ f (x_{0} + h)}{- h} & = lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f (x_{0}) ⊖ f (x_{0} - h)}{h} \\ = f^{'} (x_{0}) \end{array} \end{align}$

Definition 2.5

Let $\tilde{f} : (a, b) \to E$ . We say $\tilde{f}$ is (i)-differentiable on (a, b) if $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable in the sense (i) of Definition (2.7) and similarly for (ii), (iii) and (iv) differentiability.

Definition 2.6

(see (Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores 2006)) Let

\tilde{f} : (a, b) \to E

and x ₀ ∈ (a, b). A point x ₀ ∈ (a, b) is said to be a switching point for the differentiability of

\tilde{f}

, if in any neighborhood V of x ₀ there exist points x ₁ < x ₀ < x ₂ such that

(type 1) $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₁ in the sense (i) of Definition (2.6) while it is not differentiable in the sense (ii) of Definition (2.6), and $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₂ in the sense (ii) of Definition (2.6) while it is not differentiable in the sense (i) or Definition (2.6), or

(type 2) $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₁ in the sense (ii) of Definition (2.6) while it is not differentiable in the sense (i) of Definition (2.6), and $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₂ in the sense (i) of Definition (2.6) while it is not differentiable in the sense (ii) or Definition (2.6).

Proposition 2

(see (Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores 2006)) Let

\tilde{f} : (a, b) \to E

and x ₀ ∈ (a, b).

(a)

If x ₀ ∈ (a, b) is a switching point for the differentiability of $\tilde{f}$ of type 1, then $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₀ in the form (iv).
(b)

If x ₀ ∈ (a, b) is a switching point for the differentiability of $\tilde{f}$ of type 2, then $\tilde{f}$ is differentiable at x ₀ in the form (iii).

Definition 2.7

A triangular fuzzy number is defined as a fuzzy set in E ¹, that is specified by an ordered triple u = (a, b, c) ∈ R ³ with a ≤ b ≤ c such that $u (r) = [\underline{u} (r), \bar{u} (r)]$ are the endpoints of r-level sets for all r ∈ [0, 1], where $\underline{u} (r) = a + (b - a) r$ and $\bar{u} (r) = c - (c - b) r$ . Here, $\underline{u} (0) = a, \bar{u} (0) = c, \underline{u} (1) = \bar{u} (1) = b$ , which is denoted by u(1). The set of triangular fuzzy numbers will be denoted by E ¹.

Definition 2.8

(see (Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores 2006)) The mapping

\tilde{f} : T \to E^{n}

for some interval T is called a fuzzy process. Therefore, its r-level set can be written as follows:

(f (t)) (r) = [\underline{f} (t, r), \bar{f} (t, r)], t \in T, r \in [0, 1] .

Definition 2.9

(see (Chalco-Cano and Romn-Flores 2006)) Let

\tilde{f} : T \to E^{n}

be Hukuhara differentiable and denote

(f (t)) (r) = [\underline{f} (t, r), \bar{f} (t, r)]

. Then, the boundary function

\underline{f} (t, r)

and

\bar{f} (t, r)

are differentiable (or Seikkala differentiable) and

(f^{'} (t)) (r) = [{\underline{f}}^{'} (t, r), {\bar{f}}^{'} (t, r)], t \in T, r \in [0, 1] .

If f is (ii)-differentiable then

(f^{'} (t)) (r) = [{\bar{f}}^{'} (t, r), {\underline{f}}^{'} (t, r)], t \in T, r \in [0, 1] .

Description of the method

To obtain the approximation solution of Eqs.(1,2), based on Definition (2.6) we have two cases as follows:

Case (1):

\tilde{u} (x, t)

is (i)-differentiable, in this case we have,

\tilde{u} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x) + \int_{0}^{t} [\tilde{u} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t)] dt.

(3)

Case (2):

\tilde{u} (x, t)

is (ii)-differentiable, in this case we have,

\tilde{u} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x) ⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [\tilde{u} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t)] dt.

(4)

Now, we can write successive iterations (by using Picard method) as follows:

Case (1):

\begin{array}{l} {\tilde{u}}_{0} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x), \\ {\tilde{u}}_{n + 1} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x) + \int_{0}^{t} [{\tilde{u}}_{n} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{n_{xx}} (x, t)] dt, n \geq 0 . \end{array}

(5)

Case (2):

\begin{array}{l} {\tilde{u}}_{0} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x), \\ {\tilde{u}}_{n + 1} (x, t) = \tilde{f} (x) ⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [{\tilde{u}}_{n} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{n_{xx}} (x, t)] dt, \\ n \geq 0 . \end{array}

(6)

Remark 1

For ${\tilde{u}}_{xx}$ we have cases as follows:

Case (1):

\tilde{u}

and

{\tilde{u}}^{'}

be (i)-differentiable and

\tilde{u}

and

{\tilde{u}}^{'}

be (ii)-differentiable

\begin{array}{l} {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t) = [{\underline{u}}_{xx} (x, t, r), {\bar{u}}_{xx} (x, t, r)] . \end{array}

Case (2):

\tilde{u}

is (i)-differentiable and

{\tilde{u}}^{'}

is (ii)-differentiable and

\tilde{u}

is (ii)-differentiable and

{\tilde{u}}^{'}

is (i)-differentiable

\begin{array}{l} {\tilde{u}}^{′′} (x, t) = [{\bar{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r), {\underline{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r)] . \end{array}

Remark 2

We discuss about switching points as follows:

Case (1): $\tilde{u}$ is (i)-differentiable

If $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, x \in [a, x_{0}]$ and $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, x \in (x_{0}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{'} (x, t) = [{\bar{u}}^{'} (x, t, r), {\underline{u}}^{'} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₀ is a switching point in the form (iv).

If $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, x \in [a, x_{1}]$ and $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, x \in (x_{1}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{′′} (x, t) = [{\underline{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r), {\bar{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₁ is a switching point in the form (iv).

Case (2): $\tilde{u}$ is (ii)-differentiable

If $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, x \in [a, x_{0}]$ and $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, x \in (x_{0}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{'} (x, t) = [{\underline{u}}^{'} (x, t, r), {\bar{u}}^{'} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₀ is a switching point in the form (iii).

If $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, x \in [a, x_{1}]$ and $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, x \in (x_{1}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{′′} (x, t) = [{\bar{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r), {\underline{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₁ is a switching point in the form (iii).

Case (3): $\tilde{u}$ is (i)-differentiable

If $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, \forall x \in [a, b]$ then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{'} (x, t) = [{\underline{u}}^{'} (x, t, r), {\bar{u}}^{'} (x, t, r)]$ .

If $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, x \in [a, x_{0}]$ and $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, x \in (x_{0}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{′′} (x, t) = [{\bar{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r), {\underline{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₀ is a switching point in the form (iv).

Case (4): $\tilde{u}$ is (ii)-differentiable

If $\frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} > 0, \frac{\partial \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{∂x} < 0, \forall x \in [a, b]$ then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{'} (x, t) = [{\bar{u}}^{'} (x, t, r), {\underline{u}}^{'} (x, t, r)]$ .

If $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, x \in [a, x_{1}]$ and $\frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} < 0, \frac{\partial^{2} \underline{u} (x, t, r)}{\partial x^{2}} > 0, x \in (x_{1}, b]$ and r ∈ [0, 1] then we have ${\tilde{u}}^{′′} (x, t) = [{\underline{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r), {\bar{u}}^{′′} (x, t, r)]$ and x ₁ is a switching point in the form (iii).

Existence and convergence analysis

In this section we are going to prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution and convergence of the method by using the following assumptions.

Consider

\tilde{f} (x)

is bounded for all x ∈ [a, b] and

\begin{array}{l} D ({\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}_{xx}^{*} (x, t)) \leq LD (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)), L > 0 . \end{array}

Let,

α = (T + TL) .

Lemma 1

If

\tilde{u}, \tilde{v}, \tilde{w} \in E^{n}

and λ ∈ R, then,

(i)

$D (\tilde{u} ⊖ \tilde{v}, \tilde{u} ⊖ \tilde{w}) = D (\tilde{v}, \tilde{w}),$
(ii)

$D (⊖ λ \tilde{u}, ⊖ λ \tilde{v}) = ∣ λ ∣ D (\tilde{u}, \tilde{v}) .$

Proof (i). By the definition of D, we have,

\begin{array}{l} D (\tilde{u} ⊖ \tilde{v}, \tilde{u} ⊖ \tilde{w}) \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \underline{u (r) - v (r)} - \underline{u (r) - w (r)} ∣, \\ {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \bar{u (r) - v (r)} - \bar{u (r) - w (r)} ∣} \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ (\underline{u} (r) - \underline{v} (r)) - (\underline{u} (r) - \underline{w} (r) ∣, \\ {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ (\bar{u} (r) - \bar{v} (r)) - (\bar{u} (r) - \bar{w} (r)) ∣} \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \underline{w} (r) - \underline{v} (r) ∣, {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \bar{w} (r) - \bar{v} (r) ∣} \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \underline{v} (r) - \underline{w} (r) ∣, {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \bar{v} (r) - \bar{w} (r) ∣} \\ = D (\tilde{v}, \tilde{w}) . □ \end{array}

Proof (ii):

\begin{array}{l} D (⊖ λ \tilde{u}, ⊖ λ \tilde{v}) \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \underline{λu (r)} - \underline{λv (r)} ∣, \\ {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \bar{λu (r)} - \bar{λv (r)} ∣} \\ = max {{sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \underline{λu (r)} - \underline{λv (r)} ∣, \\ {sup}_{r \in [0, 1]} ∣ \bar{λu (r)} - \bar{λv (r)} ∣} \\ = (λ \tilde{u}, λ \tilde{v}) = ∣ λ ∣ D (\tilde{u}, \tilde{v}) . □ \end{array}

Theorem 1

Let 0 < α < 1, then Eqs.(1,2), have an unique solution and the solution ${\tilde{u}}_{n} (x, t)$ obtained from the relation (8) using Picard method converges to the exact solution of the problems (1, 2) when $\tilde{u}$ is (ii)-differentiable.

Proof. Let

\tilde{u}

and

{\tilde{u}}^{*}

be two different solutions of Eqs.(1, 2) then

\begin{align} D ( & \tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)) \\ = D (\tilde{f} (x) ⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [\tilde{u} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t)] dt, \\ \tilde{f} (x) ⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [{\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx}^{*} (x, t)] dt) \\ = D (⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [\tilde{u} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t)] dt, \\ ⊖ (- 1) . \int_{0}^{t} [{\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t) + {\tilde{u}}_{xx}^{*} (x, t)] dt) \\ \leq T (D (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t))) + TL (D (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t))) \\ = αD (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)) . \end{align}

From which we get $(1 - α) D (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)) \leq 0$ . Since 0 < α < 1, then $D (\tilde{u} (x, t), {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)) = 0$ . Implies $\tilde{u} (x, t) = {\tilde{u}}^{*} (x, t)$ .

Also, we have

D ({\tilde{u}}_{n + 1} (x, t), \tilde{u} (x, t)) \leq αD ({\tilde{u}}_{n}, \tilde{u}) .

Since, 0 < α < 1, then $D ({\tilde{u}}_{n} (x, t), \tilde{u} (x, t)) \to 0$ as n → ∞. Therefore, ${\tilde{u}}_{n} (x, t) \to \tilde{u} (x, t)$ . □

Remark 3

The proof of other case is similar to the previous theorems.

Numerical examples

In this section, we solve the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation by using the Picard method. The program has been provided with Mathematica 6 according to the following algorithm where ε is a given positive value.

Algorithm :

Example 5.1

Consider the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation as follows:

{\tilde{u}}_{t} (x, t) = {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t) + \tilde{u} (x, t) .

(7)

With initial condition:

\begin{array}{l} \tilde{u} (x, 0) = \tilde{f} (x) = ((1 - r) x^{3}, (r - 1) x^{3}) . \end{array}

(8)

ϵ = 10⁻⁴. x = 0 is a switching point.

Case (1): n = 22 and α = 0.8652.

Case (2): α = 0.84569.

Table 1 shows that, the approximation solution of the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation is convergent with 25 iterations by using the Picard method when

\tilde{u}

is (ii)-differentiable.

Table 1

Numerical results for Example 5.1

x	$(\underline{u}, r = 0.1, n = 25, t = 0.6)$	$(\bar{u}, r = 0.1, n = 25, t = 0.6)$
−0.2	0.34245	0.68532
−0.1	0.35571	0.67259
0.0	0.36438	0.66135
0.1	0.35724	0.67056
0.2	0.34862	0.67843
0.3	0.33597	0.68453
0.4	0.32551	0.69064

Example 5.2

Consider the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation as follows:

{\tilde{u}}_{t} (x, t) = {\tilde{u}}_{xx} (x, t) + \tilde{u} (x, t) .

(9)

With initial condition:

\begin{array}{l} \tilde{u} (x, 0) = \tilde{f} (x) = (x^{2} + 1, x^{2} + 2, x^{2} + 3) . \end{array}

(10)

ϵ = 10⁻³.

Case (1): α = 0.7546.

Table 2 shows that, the approximation solution of the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation is convergent with 17 iterations by using the Picard method when

\tilde{u}

is (i)-differentiable.

Table 2

Numerical results for Example 5.2

x	$(\underline{u}, r = 0.2, n = 17, t = 0.7)$	$(\bar{v}, r = 0.2, n = 17, t = 0.7)$
0.1	0.3726508	0.7023467
0.2	0.3827526	0.6939411
0.3	0.3957162	0.6848745
0.4	0.4136805	0.6612719
0.5	0.4372286	0.6559328
0.6	0.4438574	0.6337306

Case (2): α = 0.7762.

Table 3 shows that, the approximation solution of the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation is convergent with 21 iterations by using the Picard method when

\tilde{u}

is (ii)-differentiable.

Table 3

Numerical results for Example 5.2

x	$(\underline{u}, r = 0.2, n = 21, t = 0.7)$	$(\bar{v}, r = 0.2, n = 21, t = 0.7)$
0.1	0.4646316	0.7954225
0.2	0.4717726	0.7844835
0.3	0.4823549	0.7737607
0.4	0.5074658	0.7528153
0.5	0.5263437	0.7474326
0.6	0.5309183	0.7215178

Conclusion

The Picard method has been shown to solve effectively, easily and accurately a large class of nonlinear problems with the approximations which convergent are rapidly to exact solutions. In this work, the Picard method has been successfully employed to obtain the approximate solution of the Cauchy reaction-diffusion equation under generalized H-differentiability.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University

References

Abbasbandy S, Allahviranloo T: Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations by Taylor method. J Comput Meth Appl Math 2000, 2: 113-124.Google Scholar
Abbasbandy S, Allahviranloo T, Lopez-Pouso O, Nieto J. J.: Numerical methods for fuzzy differential inclusions. Comput Math Appl 2004, 48: 1633-1641. 10.1016/j.camwa.2004.03.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Abbasbandy S, Nieto J. J., Alavi M: Tuning of reachable set in one dimensional fuzzy differential inclusions. Chaos Soliton Fractals 2005, 26: 1337. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.03.018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Abbod MF, Von Keyserlingk DG, Linkens DA, Mahfouf M: Survey of utilisation of fuzzy technology in medicine and healthcare. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2001, 120: 331-349. 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00148-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Afshar Kermani M, Saburi F: Numerical method for fuzzy partial differential equations. Appl Math Sci 2007, 1: 1299-1309.Google Scholar
Allahviranloo T: Difference methods for fuzzy partial differential equations. Comput Methods Appl Math 2002, 2: 233-242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Allahviramloo T: The Adomian decomposition method for fuzzy system of linear equations. Appl Mathematics and Comput 2005, 163: 553-563. 10.1016/j.amc.2004.02.020View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Allahviranloo T, Ahmady N, Ahmady E: Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations by predictorŰcorrector method. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 1633-1647. 10.1016/j.ins.2006.09.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Barkhordari Ahmadi M, Kiani NA: Solving fuzzy partial differential equation by differential transformation method. J Appl Math 2011, 7: 1-16.Google Scholar
Barro S, Marin R: Fuzzy logic in medicine. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bede B: Note on Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations by predictor-corrector method. Inform Sci 2008, 178: 1917-1922. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.11.016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bede B, Gal SG: Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy number valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equation. Fuzzy Set Syst 2005, 151: 581-599. 10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bede B, Imre J, Rudas C, Attila L: First order linear fuzzy differential equations under generalized differentiability. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 3627-3635. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Buckley JJ, Feuring T: Introduction to fuzzy partial diferential equations. Fuzzy Sets and Syst 1999, 105: 241-248. 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00323-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Buckley, JJ: Fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 2000, 110: 43-54. 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00141-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Buckley JJ, Jowers LJ: Simulating Continuous Fuzzy Systems. Berl, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006.Google Scholar
Buckley JJ, Feuring T, Hayashi Y: Linear systems of first order ordinary differential equations: fuzzy initial conditions. Soft Comput 2002, 6: 415-421. 10.1007/s005000100155View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chalco-Cano Y, Román-Flores H: On new solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Chaos Soliton Fractals 2006, 1016-1043.Google Scholar
Chalco-Cano Y, Román-Flores H, Rojas-Medar MA, Saavedra O, Jimnez-Gamero M: The extension principle and a decomposition of fuzzy sets. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 5394-5403. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.07.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chalco-Cano Y, Roman-Flores H, Jimnez-Gamero MD: Generalized derivative and π-derivative for set-valued functions. Inf Sci 2011, 181: 2177-2188. 10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.023View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chapko R, Johansson BT: On the numerical solution of a Cauchy problem for the Laplace equation via a direct integral equation approach. Inverse Problems and Imaging 2012, 6: 25-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chen CK, Ho SH: Solving partial differential equations by two-dimensional differential transform method. Appl Math Comput 1999, 106: 171-179. 10.1016/S0096-3003(98)10115-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chen Y-Y, Chang Y-T, Chen B-S: Fuzzy solutions to partial differential equations: adaptive approach. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Syst 2009, 17: 116-127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Cho YJ, Lan HY: The existence of solutions for the nonlinear first order fuzzy differential equations with discontinuous conditions. Dyn Contin Discrete 2007, 14: 873-884.Google Scholar
Congxin W, Shiji S: Exitance theorem to the Cauchy problem of fuzzy differential equations under compactance-type conditions. Inform Sci 1993, 108: 123-134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Datta DP: The golden mean, scale free extension of real number system, fuzzy sets and 1/f spectrum in physics and biology. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2003, 17: 781-788. 10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00531-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Diamond P: Time-dependent differential inclusions, cocycle attractors and fuzzy differential equations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1999, 7: 734-740. 10.1109/91.811243View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P: Brief note on the variation of constants formula for fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 2002, 129: 65-71. 10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00158-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ding Z, Ma M, Kandel A: Existence of solutions of fuzzy differential equations with parameters. Inform Sci 1997, 99: 205-217. 10.1016/S0020-0255(96)00279-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dubois D, Prade H: Theory and application, fuzzy sets and systems. 1980. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Prade H, Dubois, D: Towards fuzzy differential calculus: Part 3, differentiation. Fuzzy Set Syst 1982, 8: 225-233. 10.1016/S0165-0114(82)80001-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Dou FF, Hon YC: Kernel-based approximation for Cauchy problem of the time-fractional diffusion equation. 2012, 36: 1344-1352.Google Scholar
El Naschie MS: From experimental quantum optics to quantum gavity via a fuzzy Kahler manifold. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2005, 25: 969-977. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.02.028View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Farajzadeh A, Hossein Pour A, Amini M: An Explicit Method for Solving Fuzzy Partial Differential Equation. Int Math Forum 2010, 5: 1025-1036.Google Scholar
Fard OS: A numerical scheme for fuzzy cauchy problems. J Uncertain Syst 2009, 3: 307-314.Google Scholar
Fard O. S.: An iterative scheme for the solution of generalized system of linear fuzzy differential equations. World Appl Sci J 2009, 7: 1597-1604.Google Scholar
Fard OS, Kamyad AV: Modified k-step method for solving fuzzy initial value problems. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 2011, 8(3):49-63.Google Scholar
Fard OS, Hadi Z, Ghal-Eh N, Borzabadi AH: A note on iterative method for solving fuzzy initial value problems. J Adv Res Sci Comput 2009, 1: 22-33.Google Scholar
Fard OS, Bidgoli TA, Borzabadi AH: Approximate-analytical approach to nonlinear FDEs under generalized differentiability. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst 2010, 2: 56-74.Google Scholar
Fei W: Existence and uniqueness of solution for fuzzy random differential equations with non-Lipschitz coefficients. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 329-4337. 10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Feng G, Chen G: Adaptative control of discrete-time chaotic system: a fuzzy control approach. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2005, 23: 459-467. 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.04.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Goetschel R, Voxman W: Elementary calculus. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1986, 18: 31-43. 10.1016/0165-0114(86)90026-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Guo M, Xue X, Li R: Impulsive functional differential inclusions and fuzzy population models. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2003, 138: 601-615. 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00522-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jang MJ, Chen CL, Liy YC: On solving the initial-value problems using the differential transformation method. Appl Math Comput 2000, 115: 145-160. 10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00137-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jiang W, Guo-Dong Q, Bin D: H∞ variable univerese adaptative fuzzy control for chaotic systems. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 2005, 24: 1075-1086. 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.056View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jowers LJ, Buckley JJ, Reilly KD: Simulating continuous fuzzy systems. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 436-448. 10.1016/j.ins.2006.03.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kaleva O: Fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 1987, 24: 301-317. 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90029-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kaleva, O: The Cauchy problem for fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 1990, 35: 389-396. 10.1016/0165-0114(90)90010-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kaleva, O: A note on fuzzy differential equations. Nonlinear Anal 2006, 64: 895-900. 10.1016/j.na.2005.01.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kauffman A, Gupta MM: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic:Theory and Application. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.Google Scholar
Lopez RR: Comparison results for fuzzy differential equations. Inform Sci 2008, 178: 1756-1779. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ma M, Friedman M, Kandel A: Numerical solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 1999, 105: 133-138. 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00233-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Mizukoshi MT, Barros LC, Chalco-Cano Y, Román-Flores H, Bassanezi RC: Fuzzy differential equations and the extension principle. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 3627-3635. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.039View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Moghadam MM, Jalal I: Finite Volume Methods for Fuzzy Parabolic Equations. J Math Comput Sci 2011, 2: 546-558.Google Scholar
Nguyen HT: A note on the extension principle for fuzzy sets. J Math Anal Appl 1978, 64: 369-380. 10.1016/0022-247X(78)90045-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Oberguggenberger M, Pittschmann S: Differential equations with fuzzy parameters. Math Mod Syst 1999, 5: 181-202.Google Scholar
Papaschinopoulos G, Stefanidou G, Efraimidi P: Existence uniqueness and asymptotic behavior of the solutions of a fuzzy differential equation with piecewise constant argument. Inform Sci 2007, 177: 3855-3870. 10.1016/j.ins.2007.03.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Puri ML, Ralescu DA: Differentials of fuzzy functions. J Math Anal Appl 1983, 91: 552-558. 10.1016/0022-247X(83)90169-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Puri ML, Ralescu D: Fuzzy random variables. J Math Anal Appl 1986, 114: 409-422. 10.1016/0022-247X(86)90093-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Seikkala S: On the fuzzy initial value problem. Fuzzy Set Syst 1987, 24: 319-330. 10.1016/0165-0114(87)90030-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Solaymani Fard O, Ghal-Eh N: Numerical solutions for linear system of first-order fuzzy differential equations with fuzzy constant coefficients. Infor Sci 2011, 181: 4765-4779. 10.1016/j.ins.2011.06.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Song S, Guo L, Feng C: Global existence of solutions to fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Set Syst 2000, 115: 371-376. 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00046-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rouhparvar H, Abbasbandy S, Allahviranloo T: Existence and uniqueness of solution of an uncertain characteristic cauchy reaction-diffusion equation by Adomian decomposition method. Math Comput Appl 2010, 15: 404-419.Google Scholar
Verma P, Sing P, George KV, Singh HV, Devotta S, Singh RN: Uncertainty analysis of transport of water and pesticide in an unsaturated layered soil profile using fuzzy set theory. Appl Math Modelling 2009, 33: 770-782. 10.1016/j.apm.2007.12.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zadeh LA: Fuzzy Sets. Inf and Control. 1965, 8: 338-353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann: Fuzzy sets theory and its applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.