Skip to main content

Partial purification and properties of cyclodextrin glycosiltransferase (CGTase) from alkalophilic Bacillus species


Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase, EC is an unique enzyme capable of converting starch and related substrates into cyclodextrins (CDs). In this paper, we report an one step gel purification method of CGTase from Bacillus sp. and later enzyme characterization. The Bacillus sp. strain was isolated from a Colocacia esculenta rizospheric soil sample and the CGTase production was carried out in alkaline medium (pH=10). The CGTase purification from the culture supernatant was performed by gel filtration. The enzyme was purified in one step with a recovery of 87.3% activity and 40-fold purification for specific enzymatic activity of 2.24 U/mg. Optimal activity was observed at pH 5.0 in citrate-phosphate buffer, and the enzyme retained almost 100 % of its activity between pH 5.5 and 10 after incubation for 1 h at 4°C. The enzyme exhibited maximum activity at 55°C and showed a T50% of 70°C. The ratio of α:β:γ CD formed by the enzyme was 0.74:1:0.61 for soluble starch and 0.29:1:0.85 for cocoyam starch.


The alkaliphilic bacilli are the best producers of the enzyme cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase, EC Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase is a multifunctional enzyme which catalyzes four related reactions: cyclizing, coupling, disproportionation, and hydrolysis. By means of the cyclizing activity, CGTase is an unique enzyme capable of converting starch and related substrates into cyclodextrins (CDs) (Jemli et al. 2007).

Cyclodextrins (CDs) are non-reducing cyclic oligosaccharides with the spatial structure of a doughnut. The interior of CDs is hydrophobic and its external surface is hydrophilic. Due to this feature, CDs are able to form inclusion complexes with either organic or inorganic molecules (Abdel et al. 2011). As a result, CDs can change physical and chemical properties of encapsulated guest compounds. Therefore, CDs are becoming increasingly popular and are extensively used in industries such as pharmaceutical, textile, agriculture, cosmetic, chemical and food, where CDs help to increase the solubility and stability, reduce volatility, and improve the control of the release of drugs, and mask odours and tastes (Atanosova et al. 2008, Hamoudi et al. 2011, Marcon et al. 2009, Sian et al. 2005, Wang et al. 2011).

CGTase is an extracellular, inducible enzyme produced only by microbial cells. The roles of CGTase production in microorganisms are still unclear; however, some researchers believe that starch is converted by CGTase into CDs that cannot be used by other competing organisms. In this way, the CDs can be used as substrate by the CGTase producer.

Most bacterial CGTases mainly produce α-CD, β-CD and γ-CD consisting of six, seven, or eight glucose units, respectively. Thus, CGTase is sometimes classified into three different types (α-, β- and γ-CGTase), depending on the major CD produced. CGTases that synthesize predominantly one type of CD have great commercial importance, because separation of one type of CDs from a mixture of products is time-consuming, costly and tedious (Jemli et al. 2007). The yields and ratios of α-, β- and γ-CD produced from starch differ depending on the origin of the CGTase and the environmental conditions (Schmid 1989). For this reason, purification and characterization of new CGTases attract a great attention in the CDs production field. Alkalophilic bacilli have received the major attention for industrial applications because of their high activity over a wide range of pH and temperatures.

The main objective of this study was to purify CGTase from alkalophilic Bacillus species isolated from soil and to characterize some relevant properties of the enzyme.

Result and Discussion

The CGTase producing strain was identified as Bacillus sp. in previous work Martinez et al. (2012).The CGTase purification from the culture supernatant was performed by gel filtration using Fractogel EMD BioSec(s) as matrix (Figure 1). The active fraction used for the biochemical characterization of the enzyme was located between tube 10 and tube 17, where the enzymatic fraction with the highest purification level was found. In the tube interval from 20 to 30, the concentration in protein (because of the culture medium composition), the cyclodextrin production and the enzymatic activity were maxima, and the enzyme could not be isolated.

Figure 1

Elution profile of the CGTase from gel filtration chromatography column using Fractogel EMD BioSEC (S). Fraction 10–17 was collected and used for subsequent characterization steps.

The enzyme could be sufficiently purified in one step with a recovery of 87.3% activity and 40-fold purification for specific enzymatic activity of 2.24 U/mg (one unit of enzyme activity refers to the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the production of 1 μmol of β-CD per minute under the reaction condition) (Table 1). A similar result has been reported for B. agaradhaerens LS-3C CGTase when sufficiently purified using starch adsorption as the sole purification step with a recovery of 50% activity and 43-fold purification (Martin and Hatti 2002).

Table 1 Summary of CGTase purification results

Enzyme activity was measured at 55°C using the standard assay method by varying the pH values from 3.0 to 10.5. The optimum pH of the purified CGTase was 5.0 (Figure 2), which is in agreement with the values reported for purified CGTases from Bacillu s sp. 7–12 (Cao et al. 2005) and B. megaterium (Pishtiyski et al. 2008). Most CGTase exhibit optimum pH ranging from 5.0 to 8.0 (Sian et al. 2005), although the enzyme from Brevibacterium sp. no. 9605 exhibits the highest activity at pH 10.0 (Mori et al. 1994).

Figure 2

Optimun pH of CGTase.

The enzyme was then incubated for 60 minutes at 4°C under various pH conditions, prior to the determination of residual activity under standard assay conditions. The enzyme retained 85% of its initial activity at pHs between 6 and 10.0. At pH 5.0 the activity retained was 70%; below this pH value a drastic reduction in enzyme activity was observed (Figure 3). When compared to other Bacillus CGTases, a similar behavior was observed for B. agaradhaerens LS-3C enzyme, which possesses the widest pH span for stability, namely between pH 5.4-11.0 (Martin and Hatti 2002).

Figure 3

pH stability of CGTase.

The activity of the purified CGTase was measured at different temperatures at pH 5.0. As can be seen in Figure 4, the enzyme was optimally active at 55°C when soluble starch was used as substrate. Studies done by other researchers on CGTase from B. megaterium (Kitahata et al. 1974), B. macerans IFO 3490 (Kaneko et al. 1990), B. lentus (Sabioni and Park 1992) and B. agaradhaerens (Martin and Hatti 2002) also pointed out 55°C as the optimum temperature. Most of the reported Bacillus CGTases shows optimum temperature in the range from 45 to 80°C (Martin and Hatti 2002).

Figure 4

Optimun temperature of CGTase.

The enzyme was stable up to 55°C at pH 5.0 for 30 min incubation, retaining almost 100% activity. However, it lost 15% of its total activity at around 70°C and had 65% activity at 75°C. The CGTase was completely inactive at 85°C (Figure 5). Thus, the isolated enzyme has higher temperature stability than CGTase from K. pneumoniae AS-22 (Gawande and Patkar 2001) and B. agaradhaerens (Martin and Hatti 2002), both showing maximum stability at 40°C.

Figure 5

Thermal stability of CGTase.

The capability of the purified CGTase to produce CDs was investigated using starches from different sources. Soluble starch appeared to be the best substrate for β-CD production, leading to α:β:γ production ratio of 0.74:1:0.61 (Figure 6). Cocoyam starch is a non conventional source to produce CDs; nevertheless, it may have interest as substrate of the isolated enzyme since it caused a marked change in the α:β:γ production ratio, i.e. 0.29:1:0.85, with respect to the soluble starch. Cocoyam starch notably increased the γ-CD production, which has high market price. The α:β:γ proportion obtained for cocoyam starch was similar to that reported for alkalophilic Bacillus sp. 7–12 CGTase (α:β:γ = 0.26:1:0.86) with soluble starch after 12 h of reaction at 60°C, pH 8.0 (Cao et al. 2005). These findings confirm that the source of starch is a critical point in the production of CDs, which can be attributed to the differences in the starch granules structure and properties.

Figure 6

Production of cyclodextrins on soluble (black) and cocoyam starch (gray).


Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) from alkalophilic Bacillus has been successfully purified and effectively used for conversion of starch into cyclodextrin under a wide range of pH conditions. The enzyme exhibits a good thermostability and shows optimum temperature at 55°C. Furthermore, it is a good candidate to obtain increased production of γ-CD production when used cocoyam starch as substrate.

Material and Methods


α-, β- and γ-Cyclodextrin were purchased from Pharmacia Biotech. Soluble starch, Fractogel EMD BioSec(s), yeast extract and peptone was purchased from Sigma. Cocoyam starch was of industrial grade. Phenolphthalein was purchased from Merck. All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

Screening and Isolation of bacteria

Bacteria were isolated from Colocacia esculenta rizospheric soil. Samples were suspended in sterile water, serial diluted, and then plated on Horikoshi II agar plate containing (w/v): 1.0 % soluble starch, 0.5 % yeast extract, 0.5 % peptone, 0.1 % KH2PO4, 0.02 % MgSO4.7H2O, 0.02 % phenolphthalein and 1.0 % Na2CO3 (separately autoclaved). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Bacterial colonies which produced the largest clear halo zones were selected for further studies (Illias et al. 2002).

CGTase production and purification

The selected strain was cultivated in flasks containing 200 mL of Horikoshi II broth culture medium and incubated at 37°C during 48 hours at 200 rpm. Cells and insoluble material were removed by centrifugation at 2012 g for 15 min at 4°C, and the cell-free supernatant was used as the source of the enzyme. The crude extract (25 ml) was concentrated to a final volume of 5 ml by rotoevaporation to 30°C. Later, the sample was purified to 4°C in chromatographic column of gel filtration(1.6X 60cm) using Fractogel EMD BioSec(s) as matrix with mobile phase buffer Tris/HCl pH 8.0 20 mM. The column was washed with the same buffer at flow rate 60 mL/h at fractions of 4ml was collected. The protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford method (Bradford 1976).

Cyclizing activity of CGTase

The cyclizing activity of CGTase was determined applying the phenolphthalein method, measuring the production of β-CD spectrophotometrically at 550 nm, on the basis of its ability to form a colourness inclusion complex with this dye. Phenolphtalein (4 mM) in ethanol was diluted in 125 mM Na2CO3 pH 11 just before starting the assay. 2% Starch in 0.05 M citrate-phosphate buffer pH 5.0 were used as substrate. One unit of CGTase is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the production of 1 μmol of β-CD per minute under the reaction conditions (Goel and Nene 1995).

Optimum pH

The effect of pH on CGTase activity was measured in the range from 3.0 to 10.5, at 55°C for 10 minutes using 50mM citrate-phosphate (pH 3.0-7.5), 50mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0-9.0) and 50mM sodium carbonate (pH 9.0–11) buffers.

Stability against pH

Enzyme preparations (0.57 U) were incubated at 4°C in 100mM sodium acetate/acetic acid (pH 3.0-5.5), 100mM K2HPO4/ KH2PO4 (pH 6.0-7.5), 100mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0-9.0) and Na2CO3 /NaHCO3 (pH 9.5-11.5) buffers. Aliquots were removed after 60 minutes of incubation, diluted in 0.1 M K2HPO4/ KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.0) and assayed for cyclizing activity of CGTase.

Optimum temperature

The effect of temperature on CGTase activity was evaluated in the range of 35-75°C in 50mM citrate phosphate (pH 5.0) buffer. After incubation for 10 minutes, the cyclizing activity was measured.


Enzyme preparations (0.57 U) were incubated at different temperatures between 25°C and 85°C in 50mM sodium citrate phosphate buffer, pH 5.0. Aliquots were removed after 30 minutes incubation, chilled quickly, and assayed for cyclizing activity.

Determination of CDs concentration

The enzyme (0.27mg/mL) was incubated at 55°C for 60 minutes with 1.5% starch in 50mM citrate phosphate buffer (pH=5.0). The concentration of the various CDs produced by the action of the purified CGTase on soluble and cocoyam starch was colorimetrically determined. The concentration of α-CD was assayed by the decrease in absorbance at 507 nm due to the formation of inclusion complexes with methyl orange (Higuti et al. 2004). The concentration of β-CD was determined according to the method described above (Goel and Nene 1995). The concentration of γ-CD was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 630 nm due to the formation of inclusion complexes with bromocresol green (Kato and Horikoshi 1984).

All experiments were carried out in triplicate under identical conditions.

Author's contributions

These authors: MMMM, RVS, JJT-L have made substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data. These authors: KHS, APR, HLR have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.



Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase




  1. Jemli S, Messaoud E, Ayadi-Zouari D, Naili B, Khemakhem B, Bejar S: A β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from a newly isolated Paenibacillus pabuli US132 strain: Purification, properties and potential use in bread-making. Biochem Eng J 2007, 34: 44-50. 10.1016/j.bej.2006.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdel M, El H, Abdel A: Biosynthesis of cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase by the free and immobilized cells of Bacillus cereus NRC7 in batch and continuous cultures. J Appl Microbiol 2011, 111: 1129-1137. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05136.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanosova N, Petrova P, Ivanova V: Isolation of novel alkaliphilic bacillus strains for cyclodextrin glucanotransferase production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008, 149: 155-167. 10.1007/s12010-007-8128-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamoudi M, Fattal E, Gueutina C, Nicolas V, Bochota A: Beads made of cyclodextrin and oil for the oral delivery of lipophilic drugs: In vitro studies in simulated gastro-intestinal fluids. Int J Pharm 2011, 416: 507-514. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.01.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcon F, Mathiron D, Pilard S, Lemaire-Hurtel A, Dubaele J, Djedaini-Pilard F: Development and formulation of a 0.2% oral solution of midazolam containing γ-cyclodextrin. Int J Pharm 2009, 379: 244-250. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sian H, Said M, Hassan O, Kamaruddin K, Ismail A, Rahman R: Purification and characterization of cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from alkalophilic Bacillus sp. G1. Process Biochem 2005, 40: 1101-1111. 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Cao Y, Sun B, Wang C: Physicochemical and release characterization of garlic oil- β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. Food Chem 2011, 127: 1680-1685. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmid G: Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase production: yield enhancement by overexpression of cloned genes. Trends Biotechnol 1989, 7: 244-248. 10.1016/0167-7799(89)90015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Martinez MM, Hernandez K, Berrios G, Villalonga R, Ramirez HL, Cabrera G 2012. . Bacillus: JQ688043

  10. Martins R, Hatti R: A new cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from an alkaliphilic Bacillus agaradhaerens isolate: purification and characterization. Enz Microb Tech 2002, 30: 116-124. 10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00461-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao X, Jin Z, Wang X, Chen F: A novel cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from an alkalophilic Bacillus species: purification and characterization. Food Res Int 2005, 38: 309-314. 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pishtiyski I, Popota V, Zhekova B: Characterization of Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase produced by Bacillus megaterium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008, 144: 263-272. 10.1007/s12010-007-8009-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mori S, Hirose S, Oya T, Kitahata S: Purification and properties of cyclodextrin glucanotrasferase from Brevibacterium sp. no. 9605. Biosc Biotech Biochem 1994, 58: 1968-1972. 10.1271/bbb.58.1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitahata S, Tsuyama N, Okada S: Purification and some properties of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from a strain of Bacillus species. Agric Biol Chem 1974, 38: 387-393. 10.1271/bbb1961.38.387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaneko T, Yoshida M, Yamamoto M, Nakamura N, Horikoshi K: Production of cyclodextrins by simultaneous actions of two CGTases from three strains of Bacillus. Starch 1990, 42: 277-281. 10.1002/star.19900420709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabioni JG, Park YK: Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase production by alkalophilic Bacillus lentus. Rev Microbiol 1992, 23: 128-132.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gawande B, Patkar A: Alpha-cyclodextrin production using cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Klebsiella pneumoniae AS-22. Starch 2001, 53: 75-83. 10.1002/1521-379X(200102)53:2<75::AID-STAR75>3.0.CO;2-J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Illias R, Siew T, Aini N: Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase Producing Alkalophilic Bacillus sp. G1: its Cultural Condition and Partial Characterization of the Enzyme. Pakistan J Biol Sci 2002, 5: 688-692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive for the quantitation of microgram quantitites of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goel A, Nene S: Modifications in the phenolphtalein method for spectrophotometric estimation of beta cyclodextrin. Starch 1995, 47: 399-400. 10.1002/star.19950471006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Higuti I, Silva P, Papp V, Okiyama M, Alves de Andrade E, Marcondes A, Nascimento A: Colorimetric determination of α and β-cyclodextrins and studies on optimization of CGTase production from B. firmus using factorial designs. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2004, 47: 837-841. 10.1590/S1516-89132004000600001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kato T, Horikoshi K: Colorimetric determination of γ-cyclodextrin. Anal Chem 1984, 56: 1738-1740. 10.1021/ac00273a049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden, and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, The Hague, The Netherlands, through a Grant to H. Ramirez (Grant F/3004-67).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan José Torres-Labandeira.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mora, M.M.M., Sánchez, K.H., Santana, R.V. et al. Partial purification and properties of cyclodextrin glycosiltransferase (CGTase) from alkalophilic Bacillus species. SpringerPlus 1, 61 (2012).

Download citation


  • Cyclodextrins glucanotransferase
  • Alkalophilic Bacillus sp.
  • Enzyme purification
  • Enzyme characterization
  • Cyclodextrin production